morbidity review

58
Morbidity review By Noorfarahnaduwah Nurdin Supervisor Dr Tuan Norizan

Upload: daria

Post on 22-Feb-2016

52 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Morbidity review. By Noorfarahnaduwah Nurdin. Supervisor Dr Tuan Norizan. Madam F, G2 P0+1 No known medical illness Height 151cm, weight 80kg, BMI 35.09 Admitted to labour room at 9pm Os 3cm, contraction 2:10 Was referred for epidural anaesthesia. Upon review @ 1am. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Morbidity review

Morbidity review

By Noorfarahnaduwah Nurdin

Supervisor Dr Tuan Norizan

Page 2: Morbidity review

•Madam F, G2 P0+1•No known medical illness•Height 151cm, weight 80kg, BMI 35.09

•Admitted to labour room at 9pm▫Os 3cm, contraction 2:10

•Was referred for epidural anaesthesia

Page 3: Morbidity review

Upon review @ 1am•Patient was on entonox•Bp 130/68 mmhg, pr 90/min•Epidural inserted at level L3L4•Anchored at 10cm•Skin to space 5cm•Test dose 3mls lignocaine 2%•Loading dose 8 mls 0.2% ropi + 50mcg

fentanyl•Started on infusion ropi 0.1% + 2mcg/ml

fentanyl 6mls/hr

Page 4: Morbidity review

5.00 am

Pain score 7-8/10 Increase infusion 13 mls/hr

3.00 amPain score 7-8/10

Increase infusion 10 mls/hr + bolus 3 mls

lignocaine 2%

1.30 am

Pain score 7-8/10 Increase infusion 8 mls/hr

Page 5: Morbidity review

10.45 am

Posted for EMLSCS for fetal distress

10.30 amPain score 7-8/10 Bolus 3 mls ropi 0.2% +

cont infusion 13 ms/hr

7.30 am

Pain score 7-8/10 Bolus 3 mls ropi 0.2% + cont infusion 13 ms/hr

Page 6: Morbidity review

In OT•Epidural was removed •Spinal anaesthesia was given at level L3L4▫Heavy marcaine 0.5% + morphine 0.1mg

+ fentanyl 20mcg (total volume 2.2mls)

•About 4 minutes after spinal, complaint of perioral & upper limbs numbness

•Bp dropped down to 70/40mmhg -> responded with phenylephrine

Page 7: Morbidity review

In OT•Spo2 dropped to 88-90%•Also complaint of difficulty in breathing•GCS 15/15•Converted to GA•Intubated with RSI technique

▫STP 250mg▫Scoline 100mg▫CL 1

•bp prior to intubation 120/57mmhg, pr 118/min

Page 8: Morbidity review

Intraoperative•Uterus on/off atony•Resuscitated with

▫1 pint gela▫1 pint sterofundin▫3 pints hartmann

•Other meds▫iv pitocin 10u▫Im ergometrine 0.5mg▫Im hemabate 250 mcg▫Iv morphine 3mg▫Iv pitocin infusion 40u

•EBL 1.4L

Page 9: Morbidity review

Post operative •Transferred to ICU for weaning•Hemodinamically not on inotropes•Extubated upon arrival to ICU

Page 10: Morbidity review

Issues •Inadequate epidural in labour as pain relief

•How to manage patient with epidural proceed with emergency c-sec▫Choices of drugs & doses

•Non functioning epidural in patient proceed with emergency c-sec▫Role of spinal, CSE & GA

Page 11: Morbidity review

Managing failed epidural analgesia for labour

•Failed?▫Partial block▫Unilateral block ▫Patchy block▫Inadequate block

Page 12: Morbidity review

Principle of management•Understand causes & factors predictive of

failed epidural

•Understand why functioning epidural catheter for labour becomes non-functional for c-sec

•Enumerate approaches to manage failed epidural for labour analgesia & operative delivery

•Recognize possible consequences of spinal anaesthesia following failed epidural block

Page 13: Morbidity review

Causes of failed

analgesia

Anatomical factors

Technique, methodology & equipment-

related factors

Initial catheter

misplacement

Catheter migration & malfunction

Catheter malfunction

& defect Patient-

related & other risk

factorsTechnical

skills/performance factors

Page 14: Morbidity review

Anatomical factors•Presence of midline epidural band/connective

tissue -> difficult to thread epidural catheter through Touhy needle -> coiling catheter during introduction

•> lumbar lordosis -> decrease intervertebral space

•Ligamentum flavum ‘softer’ & less dense due to hormonal changes & edema

•Difficulty blocking larger spinal nerve root e.g: sacral nerve root (17.53% failure rate)

Page 15: Morbidity review

Technique, methodology & equipment-related factors

1. Initial catheter misplacement ▫ Accidental transforaminal passage▫ Migration of catheter into anterior

epidural space▫ Unintended placement of catheter in

paravertebral space

*increased distance from skin to space correlates to higher incidence of unilateral block

Page 16: Morbidity review

Technique, methodology & equipment-related factors

2. Catheter migration & malfunction

▫ Up to 50% catheters migrate during labour.

▫ Greatest change in position occur in

BMI >30; change position from sitting to supine

Page 17: Morbidity review

Technique, methodology & equipment-related factors

3. Catheter malfunction & defects▫ Catheter knotting/kinking, blocked catheter

‘eyes’▫ Blocked terminal eye -> higher incidence of

unsatisfactory blocks (32%) compared to lateral eyes blocked

▫ Loss of resistance to air method -> higher incidence of inadequate analgesia compared to saline method

▫ Optimal length catheter left in space 2-6cm

Page 18: Morbidity review

Technique, methodology & equipment-related factors

4. Patient-related & other risk factors▫ Morbidly obese; BMI >30 higher risk failed

block & inadequate analgesia

▫ Presence of radicular pain during needle/catheter insertion

▫ Occipital posterior presentation of fetal head

▫ Inadequate analgesia from initial dose

▫ Labour duration >6 hours

Page 19: Morbidity review

Management of failed/inadequate epidural catheter in labour

Page 20: Morbidity review

Management of failed/inadequate epidural catheter in labour

• Reassure patient

• block inadequate, unilateral or if some dermatomes are spared?

1. Withdraw catheter until 2-3cm left in space then give another dose of analgesic

2. Change patient position when administrating the epidural. eg:

Supine position for unilateral block Sitting up position for sacral block*results of effectiveness mixed

Page 21: Morbidity review

Management of failed/inadequate epidural catheter in labour

3. Changing loading dose Bigger volume of bolus dose of dilute

epidural analgesic (eg 0.125% ropi/less) shown to be >effective than smaller volume but >concentrated dose (eg 0.2% ropi)

4. Add opiates & other adjuvants Boluses epidural fentanyl 25-50mcg Others, boluses clonidine 150mcg

Page 22: Morbidity review

Management of failed/inadequate epidural catheter in labour

•If failed to get sensory block after 30 minutes, consider:

1. Resite epidural catheter

Page 23: Morbidity review

Management of failed/inadequate epidural catheter in labour

2. Perform CSE▫ Risk high block if spinal dose is too large &

extend of block may be unpredictable

▫ If desired dermatome level not reached after spinal, upper sensory level may be increased by injecting 5mls saline epidurally ( epidural volume extension (EVE))

▫ Upper sensory block tends to be several dermatomes higher after CSE than in plain epidural top-ups, especially if done after induction of analgesia.

Page 24: Morbidity review

Management of failed/inadequate epidural catheter in labour

3. Perform single shot spinal• May be considered if delivery is imminent & risk

for c-sec is minimal

• Use of hyperbaric LA solution given in sitting position very effective

• Progression of block should be monitored closely

• Epidural top-ups should not be administered during the last 30 minutes(if time permits)

• May need to reduce dose by 20-30% than usual

Page 25: Morbidity review

Management of failed/inadequate epidural catheter in labour

4. Supplemental caudal anaesthesia

• Performed when the unblocked segments are sacral

• Should be done by experienced practitioner with carefully calibrated doses

• Generally not recommended due to high risk of local toxicity & accidental injected to foetus

Page 26: Morbidity review

Management of failed/inadequate epidural catheter in labour

5. If insufficient time to resite epidural, • supplementary systemic analgesic e.g. • small doses fentanyl/remifentanil every

1-2 mins;• entonox,• local (perineal anaesthesia)

Page 27: Morbidity review

Extending epidural analgesia for caesarean

section

Page 28: Morbidity review

Principles of management•Patient should be transferred quickly to OT for top ups where monitoring & resuscitation equipment available▫Potential adverse effect -> excessive high

block requiring intubation & accidental intravascular injection may result in seizures & cardiac event

•Performing test dose before epidural top ups may avoid potential complications, but may cause delay

Page 29: Morbidity review

Principles of management•Regular follow up patient receiving epidural anaesthesia in labour

▫Identify patients with suboptimal block -> may have inadequate intraoperative anaesthesia after top-up lead to intraoperative convertion to GA

Page 30: Morbidity review

Principles of management▫If c-sec is required, consider removing epidural catheter & convert to spinal/CSE

Reduce risk of inadequate anaesthesia & ad hoc conversion to GA.

*Risk of excessively high block, may considered lower dose of intrathecal drugs

Page 31: Morbidity review

Agents used to extend epidural blockade for caesarean section

•Usually 15-20mls of local anaesthesia needed to produce adequate block for c-sec

•Using combination of drugs & adjuvants produces faster onset anaesthesia

Page 32: Morbidity review

Local anaesthesiaI. Lidocaine 2%

▫ Recent study showed that alkalanized 2% lidocaine mixed with epinephrine 1:200,000 reduced onset time of anaesthesia & produced better quality anaesthesia

II. Ropivacaine 0.75%-1%, levobupivacaine 0.5%

▫ Less likely produce cardiac complications compared to bupivacaine

Page 33: Morbidity review

Adjuvants I. Epinephrine

▫ Reduces toxicity risk by decreasing systemic absorption of local anaesthetics from extradural space

▫ Confer some additional analgesic property

▫ Cause tachycardia if injected intravascular, hence warn the intravascular migration of epidural catheter

Page 34: Morbidity review

Adjuvants II. Sodium bicarbonate

▫ May increases speed of onset of surgical anaesthesia by increasing pH -> increase proportion of non-ionized lipid soluble LA that can diffuse into the axon

III.Opioids ▫ Improve quality of anaesthesia

Page 35: Morbidity review

Inadequate regional anaesthesia for caesarean section

Page 36: Morbidity review

•Regional anaesthesia recommended for caesarean section

▫Provide effective postoperative analgesia via intrathecal/epidural opioids

▫Avoiding GA hazards eg difficult/failed airway, aspiration of gastric contents

Page 37: Morbidity review

Prevention a. Preexisting epidural analgesia

b. Choice of regional anaesthesia technique

c. Use of opioids

d. Testing of block

e. Time consideration

f. Miscellaneous consideration

Page 38: Morbidity review

Pre-existing epidural analgesia

•Functioning epidural allows sufficient time to top up for pain free emergency c-sec

•Epidural catheter should be checked to ensure that its functioning well.

Page 39: Morbidity review

Pre-existing epidural analgesia•If amount of LA to maintain analgesia

during labour significantly higher than usual

▫may due to non functioning epidural catheter & may need to be replaced

•Regular review & identifying high risk parturient early can help reduce incidence of emergency surgery that needed GA

Page 40: Morbidity review

Choice of regional anaesthesia technique

•Single shot spinal anaesthesia ▫ not extendible in event of inadequate

anaesthesia

•If surgery expected to be longer & difficult than usual -> CSE may be a better option

Page 41: Morbidity review

Use of opioids•Fentanyl + intrathecal bupivacaine

faster onset improve perioperative anaesthesia without increase in side effects if moderate doses are used

•Intrathecal morphine/diamorphine prolonged postoperative analgesia

Page 42: Morbidity review

Testing of block•Usual ways

▫Loss sensation to touch/pressure,▫Cold temperature &▫Pin prick

•Light touch > reliable predictor for adequate SA

•Loss of pinprick sensation to T4 acceptable in epidural anaesthesia▫Bilateral LL weakness -> indicator top ups

in epidural taking effect

Page 43: Morbidity review

Time consideration•Time should be given for surgical anaesthesia to develop, particularly for epidural block▫May not be feasible in extremely emergent

situation eg cord prolapse/severe foetal distress

•Patients with epidural catheter in situ for labour analgesia, additional bolus doses may be administered once the decision for caesarean delivery made.

Page 44: Morbidity review

Miscellaneous consideration•Presence of patient’s partner in OT may be reassuring & have calming effect on patient

•Sympathetic approach by anaesthesiologist + gentle approach at surgical dissection & manipulation by surgeon can help ensure patient comfort

Page 45: Morbidity review

Management of inadequate regional anaesthesia for caesarean section

Page 46: Morbidity review

•Management option depends on▫The indication & urgency of caesarean

section

▫The time of diagnosis of inadequate regional block

▫Pre-existing regional blockade (if any)

▫The nature & severity of the pain experienced

Page 47: Morbidity review

•Risk of GA & regional anaesthesia must be considered for patients▫morbidly obese

▫exhibit features of potential difficult airway

▫have active respiratory tract infection

*in such situation, GA must be undertaken with extreme caution

Page 48: Morbidity review

Before surgery•Problems with epidural anaesthesia

▫A failed block

▫A unilateral or patchy block

▫A block height remains persistently below required T4 level

Page 49: Morbidity review

Before surgery•Measures that can be done to improve block▫Provide additional doses of LA

with/without opioids

▫Adjusting epidural catheter

▫Positioning the patient on unblocked side before top-ups

Page 50: Morbidity review

Before surgery

•Its crucial to identify non-functional epidural block perioperatively before administering maximum volume of local anaesthetic

•If there’s no time constraint & no technical difficulty in administering the first epidural block -> possible to replace epidural catheter. ▫Risk of excessive local anaesthetic

Page 51: Morbidity review

Before surgery•Use of spinal anaesthesia following failed epidural block -> highly controversial.

*may cause high block requiring tracheal intubation, ventilation & cardiovascular resuscitation.

Page 52: Morbidity review

•However, it still can be an option if appropriate precautions & technique modifications are taken such as▫Avoiding epidural boluses immediately

before spinal injection

▫Using a lower spinal dose

▫Intentionally delaying the placement of patient in a supine position following spinal injection of hyperbaric of LA in sitting position

Before surgery

Page 53: Morbidity review

Before surgery •Failed spinal block can occur despite

presence of CSF backflow due to anatomical anomalies or drug failure

•Management include ▫CSE placement at different lumbar

interspaces▫If needed, proceed to GA

Page 54: Morbidity review

During surgery before delivery of foetus•Some patients may be anxious about being

fully awake during procedure -> often requiring reassurance

•If an epidural catheter is present▫Additional top ups 3-5 mls of LA (eg 2%

lidocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline & NaHCO3) may be given together with 50mcg fentanyl

Page 55: Morbidity review

During surgery before delivery of foetus

•Other options include ▫Entonox▫small iv doses of ketamine or▫ short acting opioids (eg alfentanil)

•Conversion to GA should be strongly considered in patients whose pain persist despite of the above interventions

Page 56: Morbidity review

During surgery after delivery of foetus•Management option include

▫the previous measures▫use of iv longer acting opioids (eg meperidine,

morphine)

•Patient must not be over sedated to maintain airway & protect against gastric aspiration

*explain to patient post delivery to explain regarding failed blocks & management option available if she presents again in future.

Page 57: Morbidity review

Conclusions •Using combination of drugs & adjuvants

produce faster onset but may delay time•Mixing several drugs together may lead to

drug errors•Epidural has multiple benefit but has up to

14-20% failure rate•In situation where epidural anaesthesia not

functioning in patient posted for EMLSCS, decisions regarding other modalities need to be discussed with specialist

•Documentation

Page 58: Morbidity review

Reference