montgomery county public schoolswoodlin elementary schoolmontgomery county public schoolswoodlin...

Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary School Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary School Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolWoodlin Elementary School

Woodlin Elementary

State of the SchoolAnnual Summary of Data and Results

leading into the 2010 School Year


Together We Explore, Learn, and Succeed

Enrollment Trends Population Demographics mClass Reading

Reading benchmark testing-Grades K, 1, 2

MAP-R Measures of Academic Progress in Reading –Grades 3, 4, 5

MSAMaryland School Assessment-Grades 3, 4, 5

TN2Terra Nova Two-Grade 2

Climate Survey DataAnnual survey-staff, random sample of parents, grade 3, 5 students

Woodlin Performance Data


Enrollment Trends

Total Enrollment0

100200300400500600700

495

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 20042005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010


2010-2011Demographic Data

% Racial/Ethnic Composition05

101520253035404550

32.9

48.5

14.1

44

African American American Indian Asian Hispanic White


2010 Special Populations

% of Population0

5

10

15

20

25

15.6

8.1

21.2

SPED ESOL FARMS


Reading BenchmarksSpring 3D Data

Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 20

20

40

60

80

100

8192 88

98

87.7 77.793 91

79

Percent of Students Meeting Benchmark

Spring 2008 Spring 2009 Spring 2010


Reading BenchmarksSpring 2010 Data

AA Asian Hispanic White0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

83%

100%

91%100%

92%

100%

71%

94%

68%

83%88%

84%

Percent of Students Meeting Benchmark

Grade K Grade 1 Grade 2


Spring 2010 MAP-R% Meeting Target RIT for Grades 3-4-5- combined

Series150%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

74.6%

64.6%

100.0%

79.7%

90.1%

All African American Indian Hispanic White


MAP-R% Meeting Target RIT by Spring 2010

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 50.0

10.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0

63.0

74.0

65.0

95.8 95.289.9

69.9

81.4

72.6

2008 2009 2010


MSA Cut Scores

Reading Math

Grade Proficient Advanced

3

388

456

4

371

437

5

384

425

Grade Proficient Advanced

3

379

441

4

374

433

5

392

453


Math Reading0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

41.4 43.844.1 46.3

53.657.858.8

62.563.967.269.1

71.674.2 76.5

79.4 81.2

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

AMO Targets* Goal is 100% by 2014 *


Reading MSA 2010

All AA Asian Hispanic White FARMS SPED LEP70

75

80

85

90

95

100 96.2 96

100

90.3

97.7 96.2

100 100

Percent Proficient/Advanced

2010

Target AMO was 81.2%


Math MSA 2010

All AA Asian Hispanic White FARMS SPED LEP40

50

60

70

80

90

10086.6

82.7

94.1

74.2

93

75 74.3

95.5

Percent Proficient/Advanced

2010

Target AMO was 79.4%


MSA TrendsAchievement Gap [Reading]

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201030

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

AA Asian Hispanic White


MSA Trends

Achievement Gap [Math]

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201030

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

AA Asian Hispanic White


MSA TrendsReading

FARMS, SPED, LEP

FARMS SPED ELL0

102030405060708090

100

86.579.4 81

96.4 94.4 94.496.2100 100

2008 2009 2010


MSA TrendsMath

FARMS, SPED, LEP

FARMS SPED ELL0

102030405060708090

100

78.8

54.3

90.9

78.269.4

88.9

75 74.3

95.5

2008 2009 2010


2010 Alt-MSA% Students Proficient/Advanced

Math Reading 0.0

10.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0 83.0

100.0100.0 100.0

2009 2010


Selected Celebrations PRIMARY READING

K: 93% of all students! 1st: 92% of AA students! 2nd: 88% of Hispanic students!

MSA Reading ELL and SPED students at all time high of 100%! Hispanic students at the advanced levels increased 3.2% to 22.2%

MSA Math 100% of 4th grade & 85.7% of SPED students! AA students advanced increased 6.1% to 14.1%


2nd Grade TN2 PerformancePercent of students at or above 50th %ile

Reading Language Math Lang Mechan-

ics

Math Comp4045505560657075808590

2008 2009 2010

Target is 70% of students


2010 2nd Grade TN2 PerformancePercent of students at or above 50th %ile

Reading Language Lang. Mechan-

ics

Math Math Comp.

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

African Amer. Asian Hispanic White

Target is 70% of students at the 50th %ile


Climate SurveyBackground Information

Student Response Rate Parent Response Rate0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

82%

55%

80%

28%

2009 2010

**Note**The parent survey was

changed in 2010 to be a random sample.

Previous years were a total school community survey


Climate SurveyHighlighted Gains

(Gains greater than 3.0% points)Student Survey Teacher explains homework (↑4.3%) School staff is friendly and helpful (↑4.9%)

Parent Survey Teachers keep me informed (↑4.2%) Important information is communicated to families

(↑3.0%) School is welcoming to families of diverse cultures

(↑3.2%)


Climate SurveyHighlighted Areas of Need(Decreases greater than 4.0% points)

Student Survey I feel welcomed at this school (↓14.1%) It’s easy to talk to teachers about things that bother me

(↓20.9%) If I get in to trouble, the school staff treats me fairly

(↓11.1%) Students are well behaved (↓15.6%)

Parent Survey The school has a clear process for addressing my

concerns (↓5.5%) Students teasing my child is a problem (↑ 4.0%%)


Climate SurveyTop 3 Areas

Student Survey My teachers have high expectations (93.3%) School staff encourages students to respect others

(93.3%) The school teaches students to be responsible for their

own behavior (91.5%)

Parent Survey The school does a good job of informing me about

meetings and special events (98.5%) My child feels safe at school (98.5%) The school does a good job of getting important school

information to parents (98.5%)


Climate SurveyLowest 3 Areas

Student Survey Students in this school are well behaved (40.8%) I can work in my classroom without being bothered by

other students (42.0%) It is easy to talk to my teachers about things that bother

me (46.6%)

Parent Survey The school has a clear process for addressing my

concerns (86.2%) There is an atmosphere of open communication in my

child’s school (91.2%) It is easy for me to talk to my child’s teacher about things

concerning my child (92.5%)


Climate SurveyStaff Trends: Top 3

Strengths (100%) Staff Expectations Leadership support working with parents Satisfaction with work Safety (self and belongings) Recommend school as a place to work Discuss teaching methods with others

Relative Areas of Need Extra duties are shared equitably (73.9%) I have time to plan instruction for my students (72.7%) School staff consistently enforce rules (74.1%) Bathrooms are kept well supplied (70.4%)


Climate SurveyStaff Survey

Strengths Comparison to County

Protects In-structional Time

Shared Leadership Feedback on my work

Positive Morale0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

91.3 96 92 96

68.564

69 71

Woodlin MCPS


Climate SurveyTeasing: Percent positive response

2009 20100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

68.565

17.721.7

34.8

46.2

Students Parents Staff

Trending upward


Climate SurveyBullying : Percent positive response

Bullying is a problem0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

55.1

61.9

23 24

30.4

38.5

Students Parents Staff

Trending upward


Action Items &Next Steps

Review and renew commitment to Stop and Think and matrices

Bully Blockers Program Weekly classroom

communication instead of monthly grade level

More self-directed time to plan with teams

Continued research based reading interventions and inclusive service delivery with co-teaching

montgomery county public schoolswoodlin elementary schoolmontgomery county public schoolswoodlin...

Documents

target amo

reading grades

schoolannual summary

meeting target rit

gradeproficient advanced

random sample of parents

5tn2terra nova