monopolistic competition-alaleh mani
TRANSCRIPT
Monopolistic CompetitionMicroeconomics FoundationAlaleh Mani2010
Features1- a large number of firms compete:
Small Share for every firm so only small deviation Ignore other firms with small share collusion among many firms for higher price agreement is impossible
2-Differentiated products (CFA 2009) with close substitution exp: different running shoes with different price, however the high priced good
never disappear from market (CFA 2008)3- Competing on:
-Quality or physical attribute: Nice Design Reliable quality Services provided Ease to access to product and its service
-Price more for higher quality in downward slope for demand -Marketing: Both higher quality and lower quality need to advertise
Advertising Packaging
Entry and Exit that cause a zero economic profit in long run
Economic profit and lossLossProfit
Break Even
Monopolistic competition and Monopoly The only different lies in what happens next
when firms either make an economic profit or economic loss .
It means see if the social demand can meet the average total cost of a firm
ATC in monopoly is in its minimum location however in monopolistic competition it differs
Demand curve for monopolistic competition firms due to close substitution of goods and services are more elastic than in monopoly firms
Monopolistic competition Vs Perfect Competition
Long Run Monopolistic competition with break even situation
Excess Capacity
Markup Min ATC
Excess Capacity Excess Capacity = Efficient Quantity –
Actual Quantity If firms sell more in less price to cover
the excess capacity they incur loss because P<ATC because demand do not meet ATC
Exp: vacant table in restaurant
Efficiency Since MSC ≠ MSB not efficient Product variety is valued and costly Design and Marketing for variety=Set up costs CONFORMITY IN PRODUCTS IS EFICIENT
BUT NOT ATTRACTIVE
Development and Marketing in Decision
Innovation (cfa 2009): for firm to restore the economic benefit in monopolistic sys is to gain innovation:
imitator and competitors innovate a close substitution to gain from initial advantages
1. Profit maximizing :Marginal revenue of a developed product must be equal to
Marginal cost of developing the product 2.Efficiency:Marginal Social Benefit of developed product must be
equal to marginal social cost of developing productMonopolistic Firms prefer profit maximizing to efficiency
Development and Marketing in Decision Advertisement: manipulate the consumer concept
of their product Expenditure: hard to estimate however
generally close to 15% of the price goes for ad. name as (selling cost) Advertisement Expenditure and selling cost
increase the costs and change the demand (Sweser 2009):
Costs Demand
Selling cost and total cost Ad and selling costs are FIXED COST so
ATC increases
With Ad cost
No Ad cost
Second Cost fall from
a to be
First Ad increase
demand
Selling cost and Demand Ad decrease the demand or other firms Make the demand curve more elastic Lower the markup and price
Again here efficiency is ambiguous sell more off- set the ad costs and make variety of production
Some points Advertisement of well known Firms like
Coca cola is to signaling about their serious remaining in the market
Brands: provide information of high quality
to consumer provide incentive to stick to high
quality standard to producer to meet the expectation