monitoring student progress: administrative issues part i – history of using progress monitoring...

43
Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8, 2005

Upload: jailyn-chill

Post on 15-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Monitoring Student Progress:

Administrative Issues

Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in

Minneapolis Schools

Doug Marston

John Hintze

July 8, 2005

Page 2: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues

I. History of using progress monitoring in Minneapolis Schools

– To guide instruction

– Early intervention and response to intervention

– Keeping on track for adequate yearly progress

Parts III & IV of this presentation are found in the accompanying power point presentation

Page 3: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 4: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
Page 5: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
Page 6: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening and Eligibility for Special Education Referrals (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 7: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

MonthlyNorms ForSixth Grade

Page 8: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening and Eligibility for Special Education Referrals (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 9: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

The Effectiveness of Special Education

Marston, D. (1988). The effectiveness of special education: A time series analysis of reading performance in regular and special education. The Journal of Special Education, 21(4), 13–26.

Multiple Baseline—AB design 3 elementary schools 272 students at risk—Below 25th Percentile CAT Measured weekly on CBM 11 students identified as LD with sufficient data

Page 10: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

“Bob’s” Reading Progress

Weeks

Wor

ds C

orre

ct

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

RegularEducation

Special Education

Page 11: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

“Terry’s” Reading Progress

Weeks

Wor

ds C

orre

ct

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

RegularEducation

Special Education

Page 12: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 13: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Noncategorical Services Delivery

Marston, D. (1987). Does categorical teacher certification benefit the mildly handicapped child? Exceptional Children, 63(5), 423-431.

EMR

Teacher License

LD

EMRStu

dent

LD

Page 14: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Wor

ds C

orre

ct

Reading Improvement of 4 Groups

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

LD by LD LD by EMR EMR by LD EMR byEMRPreTest

PostTest

Page 15: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 16: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Ten Most Frequently Cited BarriersTo Implementation of Formative Evaluation Systems

1. Teachers had a limited range of instructional strategies to use when data indicated a need for instructional changes.

2. Some teachers mechanically measure and chart without using data to make instructional decisions.

3. The use of CBM represents change and brings about resistance and anxiety.

4. Ongoing training system for special and regular education staff.5. Implementing CBM in secondary schools.6. The logistics of evaluation and modification.7. Difficulty in getting staff to use CBM to adjust their instructional

strategies.8. Time needed to monitor teacher’s implementation of CBM.9. Adequate district human resources to fully implement the

program.10.Concern that words read correctly is not a measure of

comprehension.

Page 17: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 18: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Class Chart Here

Page 19: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
Page 20: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 21: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
Page 22: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 23: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

23%

35% 35%29%

56%

0%

10%20%

30%

40%50%

60%

Pe

rce

nta

ge

1979 1982 1985 1989 1993

NewCriteria

Implemented

* Based on school psychology time studies by Dr. Andrea Canter

Percentage of time spent testing by MPS school psychologists*

Page 24: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Problem Solving Model

Student Needing Alternative Programming (SNAP) Individual Education Plan

Student is Discrepant from Expectations

Stage 2Intervention Assistance Team

Stage 1Classroom Interventions

Stage 3Special Education Evaluation

Page 25: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Monitoring Reading Progress

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21

Phase A

Phase B

General Education Reading Title I: 3X per week

General Education Title I: 5X per week Direct Instruction

Page 26: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Problem Solving Model (Marston et. al., 2003)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Fall Spring

General Ed.Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3

Page 27: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 28: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
Page 29: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 30: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

3rd Grade Data

Page 31: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 32: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

CBM Growth for Lowest Quartile: 2001/2 Continuously Enrolled Students

0

20

40

60

80

100

Fall Winter Spring

Me

dia

n W

ord

s R

ea

d C

orr

ec

t

Grade 7 White Am.

Grade 7 African Am.

Grade 2 White Am.

Grade 2 African Am.

Page 33: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 34: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Spring Kindergarten: Intercorrelations

Early Literacy Measures: Validity

Onset Phonemes Segments

Letter Sounds .70 .65

.73Onset Phonemes

Page 35: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Spring Kindergarten with Fall 1st Grade CBM

Letter Sounds .62Onset Phonemes .50

Segmentation .82

Spring Kindergarten Segments PredictingFall 1st Grade Report Card Teacher Ratings

Understands what is read .66Use phonics skills .66Analyzes what is read .59Reads fluently with expression .63

Early Literacy Measures: Validity

Page 36: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)

Page 37: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
Page 38: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Clicking on any green heading allows you to sort by that column

Page 39: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Intervention worksheets can also be entered online

Page 40: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
Page 41: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

CBM data can be viewed historically and graphed for the current year

Page 42: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
Page 43: Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Twenty Years of Implementation

Monitoring Student Progress in Special Education (1982) Screening for Special Education Referrals (1983) Eligibility for Special Education (1983) Dependent Variable in Research (1985)

– Effectiveness of Special Education study (1986)– Non-categorical study (1987)

Grant Writing (1987) Experimental Teaching Project (1987) OSEP Demonstration Model Project: Formative Evaluation (1990) Regular Education Implementation of CBM: Student, Class, Grade (1991) School Improvement Plans (1992) Waiver of State Eligibility Rules: Problem Solving Model (1993) CBM and High Stakes Testing (1997) Best Practices for Reading Instruction (1997) Office for Civil Rights Voluntary Compliance Agreement (1998) CBM and Early Literacy Measures (1999) OCR Website and Student CBM data (2000) Videos and Web-based Tutorials (2003)