monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

34
Degradation Monitoring Methods in the Brazilian Amazon Carlos Souza Jr., Ph.D. [email protected] Webinars sobre Experiencias y Lecciones Aprendidas en el Uso ee Datos ee Sensores Remotos ee Alta Resolución

Upload: centro-de-excelencia-virtual-en-monitoreo-forestal

Post on 26-Jan-2017

283 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Degradation Monitoring Methods in the Brazilian Amazon

Carlos Souza Jr., [email protected]

Webinars sobre Experiencias y Lecciones Aprendidas en el Uso ee Datos ee Sensores Remotos ee Alta Resolución

Page 2: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Forest DegradationSelectively logged forest, Sinop-MT Deforested area for plantation, Sinop-MT

Forest degradation has been defined as a type of land modification, which means that the original land cover structure and composition is temporarily or permanently changed, but it is not replaced by other type of land cover type (Lambin, 1999).

Page 3: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Sources of Human Pressure that Cause Forest Sources of Human Pressure that Cause Forest DegradationDegradation

Highly DetectableHighly Detectable Marginally DetectableMarginally Detectable Almost UndetectableAlmost Undetectable

► DeforestationDeforestation► Forest fragmentationForest fragmentation► Recent slash-and-burn Recent slash-and-burn agricultureagriculture► Major canopy firesMajor canopy fires► Major roadsMajor roads► Conversion to three Conversion to three monoculturesmonocultures► Hydroelectric dams and other Hydroelectric dams and other forms of flood disturbancesforms of flood disturbances► Large-scale miningLarge-scale mining

► Selective loggingSelective logging► Forest surface firesForest surface fires► A range of edge-effectsA range of edge-effects► ‘‘Old-slash-and-burn agricultureOld-slash-and-burn agriculture► Small scale gold-miningSmall scale gold-mining► Unpaved secondary roads (6-20-Unpaved secondary roads (6-20-m wide)m wide)► Selective thinning of canopy Selective thinning of canopy treestrees

► Hunting and exploitation of Hunting and exploitation of animal productsanimal products► Harvesting of most non-timber Harvesting of most non-timber plants productsplants products► Old-mechanized selective Old-mechanized selective logginglogging► Narrow sub-canopy roads (<6-m Narrow sub-canopy roads (<6-m wide)wide)► Understorey thinning and and Understorey thinning and and clear cuttingclear cutting► Invasion of exotic speciesInvasion of exotic species► Spread of pathogensSpread of pathogens► Changes in net primary Changes in net primary productivityproductivity► Community wide shifts in plant Community wide shifts in plant species compositionspecies composition► Other cryptic effects of climate Other cryptic effects of climate changeschanges► Most higher-order effectsMost higher-order effects

Selective loggingSelective loggingBurned forestsBurned forestsForest fragmentation Forest fragmentation RoadsRoadsGold miningGold mining

Peres et al., (2006), TREE

Remote Sensing Detection

Page 4: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Selective LoggingSelective Logging

Photo: Carlos Souza Jr. Photo: Carlos Souza Jr.

► Predominantly unplannedPredominantly unplanned► Harvesting intensity varies from 5 Harvesting intensity varies from 5

to 40 mto 40 m33 of logs / ha of logs / ha► Builds extensive road network Builds extensive road network ► Creates favor conditions for forest Creates favor conditions for forest

firesfires► Catalyzes deforestationCatalyzes deforestation

Selective Logging in Sinop – MT, BrazilSelective Logging in Sinop – MT, Brazil

Deforestation, Selective Logging and Fires

Souza Jr. and Roberts (2005)

Photo: P. Barreto, Paragominas, PA. 1993Photo: P. Barreto, Paragominas, PA. 1993

Page 5: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Available Methods to Detect and Map Selective Available Methods to Detect and Map Selective LoggingLoggingMapping Approach Studies Sensor Spatial Extent Objective Advantages Disadvantages

Visual Interpretation

Watrin e Rocha (1992) Landsat TM5 Local Map total logging area Does not require sophisticated image processing techniques

Labor intensive for large areas and may be user biased to define the boundaries.

Stone and Lefebvre (1998) Landsat TM5 Local

Matricardi et al. (2001) Landsat TM5 Brazilian Amazon

Santos et al. (2002) Landsat TM5 Brazilian Amazon

Detection of Logging Landings + Buffer

Souza Jr. e Barreto (2000)Matricardi et al. (2001)Monteiro et al. (2003)Silva et al. (2003)

Landsat TM5 e ETM+

Local Map total logging area (canopy damage, clearings and undamaged forest)

Relatively simple to implement and satisfactorily estimate the total logging area

Logging buffers varies across the landscape and does not reproduce the actual shape of the logged area.

Decision Tree

Souza Jr. et al. (2003) SPOT 4 Local Map forest canopy damage associated with logging and burning

Simple and intuitive classification rules.

It has not been tested in very large areas and classification rules may vary across the landscape.

Change Detection

Souza Jr. et al. (2002) Landsat TM5 e ETM+

Local Map forest canopy damage associated with logging and burning

Enhances forest canopy damaged areas.

Requires two pairs of images and does not separate natural and anthropogenic forest changes.

Image Segmentation

Alencastro Graça et al. (2005) Landsat TM5 Local Map total logging area (canopy damage, clearings and undamaged forest)

Relatively simple to implement and satisfactorily estimate the total logging area. Free software available.

It has not been tested in very large areas and segmentation rules may vary across the landscape.

CLAS

Asner et al., 2005 Landsat TM5 e ETM+

Three states of the Brazilian Amazon (PA, MT and AC)

Map total logging area (canopy damage, clearings and undamaged forest)

Fully automated and standardized to very large areas.

Requires very high computation power, and pairs of images to forest change detection. Tested only with Landsat ETM+

NDFI+CCA

Souza Jr., 2005b Landsat TM5 e ETM+

Local Map forest canopy damage associated with logging and burning

Enhances forest canopy damaged areas.

It has not been tested in very large areas and does not separate logging from burning damages.

Gregory P. Asner, Michael Keller, Marco Lentini, Frank Merry, and Carlos Souza Jr., 2009. LAB Chapter 3

Page 6: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Logging and Fires in Landsat Images: visual interpretation

Selective logging

1998

1999 Old Selective logging

Selective logging and burning

2000

2001 Old selective logging andburning

R5, G4, B3 Souza Jr. et al., (2003)

Page 7: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Mapping Infrastructure: GIS mapping

Souza Jr. and Barreto (2002), IJRS 7

Page 8: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Texture Enhancement and Visual Interpretation

Matricard et al., 2007. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160600763014

Page 9: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Spatial Distribution of Logging

Matricard et al., 2007. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160600763014

Page 10: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

http://www.obt.inpe.br/degrad/

Page 11: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

CLASlite Forest Monitoring

http://claslite.carnegiescience.edu/en/

Page 12: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

DEGRAD 2007, INPE

Page 13: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

ImgTools Software

Souza Jr., et al., (2005); Souza Jr. et al., (2013); Souza Jr. e Siqueira (2013)

Page 14: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Spectral Mixture Analysis and NDFI

Souza Jr. et. Al (2005), RSE

Soil

NPV

GV

-1 ≤ NDFI ≤1NDFI baixo a moderado

NDFI = ˜1

Veg - altoNPV e Solo - Baixo

Veg - baixo a moderadoNPV e Solo - moderado a alto

Page 15: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Fraction Images and NDFIa) Paragominas,Pará State - 223/62

Solo

Veg NDFI

NPV

Page 16: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

NPV Fraction

226/68 - 2001 (Sinop - MT)

Roads

LoggedForest

Mapping Selective Logging with Landsat Image (Souza Jr. et al., 2005)

Page 17: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

GV Fraction

226/68 - 2001 (Sinop - MT)

LoggedForest

Roads

Mapping Selective Logging with Landsat Image (Souza Jr. et al., 2005)

Page 18: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

NDFI (Normalized Difference Fraction Index)

226/68 - 2001 (Sinop - MT)

Roads

LoggedForest

Mapping Selective Logging with Landsat Image (Souza Jr. et al., 2005)

Page 19: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

SMA Application: Forest Change Detection

Deforestation 1999

GV 1999

GV 2000

GV Classified Image

RegenerationDegradationNew deforestationIOld deforestationForest

Page 20: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

SMA Application: Forest and Land Cover Dynamics

Page 21: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

0

10

20

30

40

50

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

NPV

%NPV Fraction (%)Small damage

Burned forest

Regeneration

Profile location

1997 1998 1999

2000 2001 2002

0

10

20

30

40

50

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

NPV

%NPV Fraction (%)Small damage

Burned forest

Regeneration

Profile location

SMA Application: Forest and Land Cover Dynamics

Page 22: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Knowledge based Decision Tree

Souza Jr. et al., (2013), Remote Sensing

Page 23: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION DYNAMICS

Souza Jr., 2013

Page 24: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Classification 2002R: NDFI02, G: NDFI03

B: NDFI03 Classificaiton 2003

Forest Change Detection

Old Deforestation

New Deforestation

Non-forest

Forest Degradation

Deforestation

LoggingOld Logging

LoggingDeforestation

Logging

Forest loss

Regrowth

Non Change

Page 25: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Tracking Forest Cover Dynamics

Page 26: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Dynamic of Forest Degradation

1998

Logged and Burned

a

Logged

Logged

Old

Logged

Old Logged and Burned

Old Logged and Burned

Logged and Burned

c d

e f

b

• Degrataion signal changes fast.

• There is a synergism of forest degradation processes that can reduces more C stocks of degraded forests.

• Reccurrent forest degratation is expected and creates even more loss of C stocks.

• Annual monitoring is required to keep track of forest degrataion process.

Page 27: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Deforestation and Forest Degradation in the Brazilian Amazon: 2000-2010

27Souza Jr. et , 2013, Remote Sensing.

Page 28: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Accuracy Assessment

Page 29: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Accuracy Assessment

Souza Jr. et al., (2013), Remote Sensing

Page 30: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Accuracy Assessment

Page 31: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Accuracy Assessment

Souza Jr. et al., (2013), Remote Sensing

Page 32: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Mapping Results

Souza Jr. et al., (2013), Remote Sensing

Page 33: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Monitoring of forest degradation: a review of methods in the Amazon basinC Souza Jr - Global forest monitoring from earth observation, 2012

Page 34: Monitoring forest degradation in the brazilian april 2016

Equipe SAD :Carlos Souza Jr.Antônio Victor FonsecaMarcelo JustinoJoão Victor SiqueiraDalton Cardoso

Colaboradores:Beto VeríssimoHeron Martins

Júlia RibeiroKátia Pereira

Rodney SalomãoBruno Oliveira