monetary economics michaª brzoza-brzezina
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Empirical approach to monetary economicsMonetary economics
Michaª Brzoza-Brzezina
Warsaw School of Economics
1 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Plan of the Presentation
1 Introduction
2 Data
3 Moments
4 SVARs
5 Exercises
6 VAR based evidence
7 Long run e�ects of monetary policy
2 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Introduction
Basic facts about business cycles and monetary economics thatmodels are supposed to match:
monetary transmission from interest rates to output andin�ationmoments of data (variances, cyclical behavior, autoreggression)long run e�ects of monetary policy
This lecture:
Data preparationBusiness cycle momentsIdenti�cation of monetary policy shocks via SVARsShort-run e�ectst of monetary policy (SVAR evidence)Long-run e�ects of monetary policyEstimation of SVAR for monetary transmission
3 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Plan of the Presentation
1 Introduction
2 Data
3 Moments
4 SVARs
5 Exercises
6 VAR based evidence
7 Long run e�ects of monetary policy
4 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Why do we need data?
To estimate econometric models
To calibrate DSGE models
To estimate DSGE models
5 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Business cycles
Models discussed in this lecture are (mainly) used to explainbusiness cycles
This means short and medium term co-movements ofmacroeconomic variables
We do not speak about growth here
If stationary RBC/ NK models are brought to the data, itshould have no trend
6 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Detrending data
Several methods for detrending (�ltering) the data (e.g.Pollock 2008)
Most popular:
1 Hodrick-Prescott (HP) �lter2 Baxter-King �lter3 Linear trend
Be careful:
1 not every variable needs to be detrended (GDP yes,unemployment rate not, in�ation maybe)
2 if model written down in log-deviations use logs - cycle will bein percent deviation from trend
3 take care of structural breaks4 endpoints are problematic5 use common sense
7 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Detrending data - HP Filter
Hodrick-Prescott (HP) �lter very popular in applications(though also criticised, see e.g. Hamilton (2017)
Let yt denote the log of a time series variable, τt its trendcomponent and ct its cyclical component, so that yt ≡ τt + ct .
Then there exists a τt that solves:
min
{T
∑t=1
(yt − τt)2 + λ
T−1∑t=2
[(τt+1 − τt)− (τt − τt−1)]2
}
The �rst term penalizes the deviations from trend, the secondthe variability of the trend growth rate.
λ determines the smoothness of the trend.
8 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Detrending data - HP trend
-.06
-.04
-.02
.00
.02
.04
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15
LOG_GDP Trend Cycle
Hodrick-Prescott Filter (lambda=1600)
9 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Detrending data - linear trend
-.20
-.15
-.10
-.05
.00
.05
.10
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 15
LOG_GDP Trend Cycle
Hodrick-Prescott Filter (lambda=1600000000)
10 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Plan of the Presentation
1 Introduction
2 Data
3 Moments
4 SVARs
5 Exercises
6 VAR based evidence
7 Long run e�ects of monetary policy
11 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Veri�cation based on moments
Selected moments can be used to check how well the modeldescribes the business cycle
Which moments?
standard deviationsautocorrelationscross-correlations
12 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Example: US moments
Source: Angeloni et al. (2002)
13 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Conclusions based on moments
Strong procyclicality of consumption, investment, employment
Consumption less volatile than output
Investment more volatile than output
High correlation between (lagged) GDP and in�ation
High autocorrelation (persistence) of most variables
Moments di�er between countries
14 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Plan of the Presentation
1 Introduction
2 Data
3 Moments
4 SVARs
5 Exercises
6 VAR based evidence
7 Long run e�ects of monetary policy
15 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Some history
Macroeconometric modeling long, long time ago (1960-70's):
in the spirit of the Cowles Commission(very) big models with equations postulated by theory orempiricsso big that di�cult to understandnot necessarily good at forecastingcriticised on theoretical grounds (Lucas)
Two alternative approaches from the 1980's:
VAR (Sims 1980)RBC (Kydland & Prescott 1982) and NK (Woodford 1999)
16 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Vector Autoregressions
Small, atheoretical models
Each variable is determined by lags of all variables
Highly popular i.a. in modeling monetary transmission
Parameters di�cult to interpret but provide causality tests,impulse responses, variance decompositions
17 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Basic VAR
Consider a simple model of the form
y1,t = c1,1y1,t−1 + c1,2y2,t−1 + v1,t
y2,t = c2,1y1,t−1 + c2,2y2,t−1 + v2,t
or in matrix notation
yt = Cyt−1 + vt
This is a VAR(1). Note that using one lag is not restrictive,since further lags can be introduced as additional variables,e.g.:
(ytzt
)=
[C1 C2
I 0
] (yt−1zt−1
)+
(vt0
)18 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Lag operators
For further purposes it is useful to use the lag operator:
Lkxt ≡ xt−k
The lag operator follows the same algebraic rules as themultiplication operator:
L(x + y) = Lx + Ly
L(λx) = λLx
LkLlx = Lk+lx
In particular Lxt = xt−1 and xt = L−kxt−k .
19 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Inversion
Usefull inversion. Consider the following expression:
[1− CL]−1 = 1+ CL+ (CL) 2 + ... =∞
∑i=0
(CL)i
20 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Moving average representation
Write VAR using lag operators
yt = CLyt + vt
Substract
[I−CL]yt = vt
Invert
yt = [I−CL]−1vt =∞
∑i=0
Civt−i (1)
This is the MA (moving average) representation of a VAR.
21 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Reduced form VAR
Our estimated VAR is of the form
Iyt = Cyt−1 + vt
This is called reduced form because it does not provide anexplanation of the contemporaneous relationship betweenvariables
Still, can be useful:
ForecastingGranger causality testsStarting point for recovery of structural form
22 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Reduced vs. structural form
The reduced form of a more general (structural) model, whichdoes not provide an explanation of the contemporaneousrelationship between variablesThese are hidden in the correlation structure of the VCVmatrix Σ.The reduced model has correlated shocks
correlation re�ects the contemporaneous relation of thevatriablescomplicates generation of impulse responsescomplicates generation of variance or historical decomposition
But we cannot estimate the structural model (regressorscorrelated with error term)The structural relationship cannot be identi�ed from thereduced model unless additional restrictions are imposedSee Amisano & Giannini �Topics in Structural VAR Modeling�or Favero �Applied Econometrics� for details
23 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Identi�cation of the structural shocks
Write reduced form VAR:
yt =CLyt+ vt
Now premultiply by Θ such that ΘΣΘ′= I
Θyt = DLyt + ut
where ut = Θvt and DL = ΘCLNote that:
Θ imposes a structure on the contemporaneous relationshipbetween the variablesthe disturbances ut are now orthogonal
24 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Identi�cation problem
But how can we determine Θ?
Recall that ΘΣΘ′= I , hence Θ−1Θ
′−1 = ΣConsider a 2-variable VAR:
[σ1,1 σ1,2σ2,1 σ2,2
]=
[θ1,1 θ1,2θ2,1 θ2,2
]−1 [θ1,1 θ1,2θ2,1 θ2,2
]′−1We have 4 unknowns, but only 3 independent equations (notethat Σ is symmetric)
To identify Θ we need one additional restriction
In general n(n− 1)/2 restrictions are needed (where n is thedimension of Θ).
25 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Recursive (Cholesky) identi�cation scheme
How should we choose these restrictions?
Many possibilities
The most popular identi�cation scheme in MTM VARs: useCholesky factors
Cholesky factor of (positive de�nite) Σ is a lower triangularmatrix Ξ, such that Σ = ΞΞ
′.
Cholesky identi�cation assumes Θ = Ξ−1 (which is lowertriangular too)
This implies ΘΣΘ′= I , so that disturbances ut are
orthogonal.
26 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Cholesky identi�cation scheme
What does recursive identi�cation imply in terms ofeconomics?
It implies an ordering - which variable a�ects which in thecurrent period
Assume a standard monetary VAR with yt = [∆yt πt it ]′
Then Θ =
θ1,1 0 0θ1,2 θ2,2 0θ1,2 θ1,2 θ3,3
implies that:
eq 1: in�ation and interest rate have no current impact onoutputeq 2: interest rate has no current impact on in�ation (butoutput does)eq 3: all variables have a current period impact on the interestrate
Note that ordering of variables is crucial for the identi�cation.
27 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Structural VARs - general approach
But Cholesky identi�cation is not the only possible oneMore generaly, one can write a structural model
Ayt = CLyt +But (2)
or yt=A−1CLyt +A−1But which implies vt = A−1But(where vt are reduced form residuals and ut are structuralshocks)This is the (so called) AB decomposition (Amisano & Giannini2011, Favero 2001)Matrix A determines contemporaneous relationship betweenvariablesMatrix B determines the impact of shocks on current-periodvariablesMany econometric softwares (e.g. Eviews, Gretl) allow forstructuralizing VARs by imposing restrictions on A and Bmatices.
28 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Structural VARs - interesting output
Once we have identi�ed orthogonal, interpretable shocks, wecan generate economically interesting output:
Impulse responsesVariance decompositionsHistorical (shock) decompositions
29 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Impulse responses
Impulse responses show how each variable reacts to a givenshock (e.g. monetary policy shock like in our case)
Recall the structural VAR yt=Fyt−1 + Θ−1ut whereF ≡Θ−1DAssume a shock happens at time t (in all other periodsut+s = 0)
Its impact on yt is Θ−1
Its impact on yt+1 is FΘ−1
Its impact on yt+2 is F2Θ−1 and so on
These are impulse responses of yt+s for s = 0, 1, ... to a shockin ut
30 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Forecast error variance decomposition
FEVD shows what share of forecast error variance can beexplained by a given shock
Recall the MA representation of the VAR model (1)
And apply the MA representation to the structural model
Then the error of forecasting yt+s (i.e. s periods into thefuture) is
yt+s − Etyt+s = ∑∞i=0 F i Θ−1ut+s−i − Et ∑∞
i=0 F i Θ−1ut+s−i
= ∑si=0 F i Θ−1ut+s−i + ∑∞
i=s+1 F i Θ−1ut+s−i − Et ∑si=0 F i Θ−1ut+s−i − Et ∑∞
i=s+1 F i Θ−1ut+s−i
= ∑si=0 F i Θ−1ut+s−i + ∑∞
i=s+1 F i Θ−1ut+s−i − 0−∑∞i=s+1 F i Θ−1ut+s−i = ∑s
i=0 F i Θ−1ut+s−i
31 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Forecast error variance decomposition
Forecast error variance is
var(yt+s − Etyt+s) =s
∑i=0
FiΘ−1IΘ−1′Fi′ = z (3)
Note that all covariance terms disappeared due to theorthogonality assumption
Elements of znxn show the variance of each variable in y dueto each structural shock in u
32 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Historical (shock) decomposition
Again go back to the MA representation of the SVAR
yt =∞
∑i=0
FiΘ−1ut−i
This means that each variable in yt can be decomposed intothe impact of each shock in ut
This is called historical (or shock) decomposition
33 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Plan of the Presentation
1 Introduction
2 Data
3 Moments
4 SVARs
5 Exercises
6 VAR based evidence
7 Long run e�ects of monetary policy
34 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Blueprint for SVAR estimation
1 Decide on your variables of interest
2 Prepare your data - use stationary time series (e.g. use ADFtest, but common sense is also valuable)
3 Find optimal lag lenght
4 Estimate the VAR
5 Impose identifying restrictions
6 Generate impulse responses
7 Generate variance decompositions
8 Generate historical decomposition
35 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Variables of interest
Remember that a VAR generates many coe�cients - you can'tadd too many variables
Rule of thumb - # of coe�cients in each equation <= 1/3sample lenght
So with 60 observations and 4 lags use max 5 variables
Quarterly, monetary VAR:
must be: GDP, in�ation, interest ratemay be: money, credit, exchange rate
36 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Stationarity
Several tests available: Dickey-Fuller, Phillips-Perron,Kwiatkowski�Phillips�Schmidt�ShinADF & PP: H0 - data has a unit root; KPSS: H0 - data isstationaryMost popular is ADF:
∆yt = α + βt + γyt−1 + δ1∆yt−1 + ...+ δp−1∆yt−p−1 + εt
note that this is equivalently:
yt = α + βt + (γ + 1)yt−1 + δ1∆yt−1 + ...+ δp−1∆yt−p−1 + εt
H0: γ = 0 (random walk); H1: γ < 0 (AR)Test statistic: DFT = γ̂
SE (γ̂).
Problem with ADF: low power. Too often the RW hypothesiscannot be rejected.
37 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Finding optimal lag length for the VAR
Again, many tests available: LR, HQ, BIC, AIC
They all weight the bene�t from more lags (more information)against the cost (more parameters to estimate)
E.g. Akaike Information Criterion:
AIC = 2k − 2ln(L)
where k is number of parameters to be estimated and L is value ofmaximized likelihood function (i.e. probability of getting the data ygiven the estimated parameters θ:
L(θ|y) = P(y |θ)
38 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
(S)VAR estimation
Alternative approaches:
estimate ordinary VAR and impose Cholesky restrictions toidentify impulsesimpose restrictions before estimation (i.e. estimate SVAR)
Ordinary VAR is estimated with OLS equation by equation
SVAR with imposed restrictions is estimated with maximumlikelihood (system estimator)
39 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
IRFs, FEVD and historical decomposition
Once we identi�ed structural shocks impulse responses, FEVDor historical decomposition can be analyzed
40 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Exercise 1: Estimate VAR and plot Cholesky orthogonalizedimpulse responses
1 This code estimates an unrestricted VAR for the US andimposes orthogonality conditions later to generate impulseresponses or variance decompositions
1 Open Gretl, Open Data_US.gdt2 Go to Sample�Set range and set 1960:1-2007:43 Go to Variable�Unit root test do ADF test4 Go to Model�Time series�Multivariate�Vector
autoregression5 Choose variables: endogenous: GDP_Q, GDP_DEFL,
FEDFUNDS, exogenous: COMMODITY6 Go to Graphs�Impulse responses, set proper ordering for
Cholesky
41 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Exercise 2: Estimate SVAR with restrictions
1 This code estimates a VAR with orthogonality conditionsimposed
1 Open Gretl2 Open mtm_svar.inp. This estimates SVAR with the �C-type�
restriction imposed, s.t. ut = Cvt3 Execute4 Compare impulse response to monetary policy shock with
those from unrestricted VAR
2 Note that SVAR estimation gives a much wider range ofpossible restrictions (for instance AB type restrictions can beimposed)
42 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Exercise 3: Assess the importance of monetary policy shocks
1 Look at the variance decomposition, are monetary policyshocks important drivers of the business cycle?
2 Look at the historical decomposition. When was monetarypolicy particularly important in driving in�ation?
43 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Exercise 4: Some VAR algebra in practice
1 Go back to unrestricted VAR (script mtm_var.inp). Show thatindeed ΘΣΘ
′= I
1 Calculate the Cholesky factor Ξ of Σ (Gretl has a built-infunction)
2 Calculate Θ = Ξ−13 Calculate ΘΣΘ
′
2 Compare Ξ from the VAR and the C matrix from the SVARestimation. They should be equal (explain why). (In fact theyare almost equal due to di�erences in the way VAR and SVARpackages calculate Σ, see footnote 6 in Gretl User Guide).
44 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Exercise 5: Calculate business cycle moments
1 Go to ec.europa.eu/eurostat2 Download quarterly data for various countries (e.g. Poland,
Germany, France, USA etc.). One Student - one country.1 real GDP (index)2 real consumption (index)3 real investments (index)4 real e�ective exchange rate (index, CPI de�ated)5 in�ation6 short-term interest rate (WIBOR3M)
3 Import data to Matlab4 Take logs of (a)-(c)5 Exclude Hodrick-Prescott trend (smoothing parameter for
quarterly data is 1600). Use function hp�lter.m.6 Write codes that calculate standard deviations,
autocorrelations, correlations with output and collect them intables (matrices)
7 Compare between countries 45 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Plan of the Presentation
1 Introduction
2 Data
3 Moments
4 SVARs
5 Exercises
6 VAR based evidence
7 Long run e�ects of monetary policy
46 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Example (Recursive identi�cation, US data)
-1-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0 5 10 15 20
quarters
GDP_Q -> GDP_Q
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6
0 5 10 15 20
quarters
GDP_DEFL -> GDP_Q
-1.6-1.4-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0 0.2 0.4
0 5 10 15 20
quarters
FEDFUNDS -> GDP_Q
-0.3-0.2-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
0 5 10 15 20
quarters
GDP_Q -> GDP_DEFL
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
0 5 10 15 20
quarters
GDP_DEFL -> GDP_DEFL
-0.6-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1 0 0.1 0.2
0 5 10 15 20
quarters
FEDFUNDS -> GDP_DEFL
-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
0 5 10 15 20
quarters
GDP_Q -> FEDFUNDS
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
0 5 10 15 20
quarters
GDP_DEFL -> FEDFUNDS
-0.4-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 5 10 15 20
quarters
FEDFUNDS -> FEDFUNDS
47 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Identi�cation schemes for monetary policy
Cholesky decomposition is a very popular way of identifyingstructural shocks in monetary VARsOf course Cholesky is not the only identi�cation scheme formonetary policySeveral other identi�cation schemes have been developed toidentify monetary policy shocks
Bernanke & Mihov (1998, QJE) use a structural VAR (withAB decomposition) but include money market data and imposerestrictions only in this area (no macroeconomic restrictions)Romer & Romer (2004, AER) use a narrative approach - theystudy records from FOMC meetings. Find stronger and fastere�ects of monetary policy than those obtained usingconventional indicators.Bagliano & Favero (1999, EER), Gürkaynak, Sackb &Swanson (2005, IJCB), Gertler & Karadi (2012, AER): highfrequency identi�cation of shocks based on small time windowaround monetary policy decissions.Uhlig (2001), Canova & DeNicolo (2002, JME) use signrestrictions on impulse responses
48 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Bernanke and Mihov restrictions
Impose a structural relationship between fedfunds rate, totalreserves and borowed reserves
49 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
E�ects of monetary policy shock - Bernanke & Mihov
50 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
E�ects of monetary policy shock - Romer & Romer
51 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Bagliano & Favero model
52 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
E�ects of monetary policy shock - Bagliano & Favero
53 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
E�ects of monetary policy shock - Uhlig
In Uhlig (2001) identifying restrictions are placed on theimpulse response functions:
the response of the Federal Funds Rate does not fall belowzero during the �rst 12 months (i.e. month 0 to 11) followingthe shock,the response of CPI in�ation, nonborrowed reserves and realGDP does not rise above zero during the �rst 12 monthsfollowing the shock.
54 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Conclusions based on VARs
After a contractionary monetary policy shock
output declinesmax reaction after a few (~3-5) quartersin�ation usually declines (reaction less clear)max reaction later than for outputsometimes price puzzle obtained (missing variables? - seeFAVAR Bernanke, Boivin, Eliasz 2005, QJE)
55 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Plan of the Presentation
1 Introduction
2 Data
3 Moments
4 SVARs
5 Exercises
6 VAR based evidence
7 Long run e�ects of monetary policy
56 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Neutrality of money (monetary policy)
Old concept (1930s)
Neutrality: money (monetary policy) does not in�uence realvariables
We already know: no neutrality in the short run
How about the long run?
Theory leans towards long-run neutrality (rational agentscannot be fooled permanently)With some exceptions:
very high in�ation destructive (resource allocation, othercosts)very low (negative) in�ation bad as well (DNWR)real money demand depends on nominal rates (see MIU)
Empirics?
57 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Empirical literature
Empirical literature mildly in favor of long-run neutrality (King& Watson 1997, see Bullard 1999 for an overview)
King & Watson (1997) use US data 1949.1 - 1990.4
Estimate system with money and output
Result: long-run elasticity of output wrt money (γym) asfunction of identifying assumption on reverse elasticity (γmy )
58 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Exceptions
Exceptions:
very high in�ation bad (Barro 1994)DNWR is an empirically con�rmed phenomenon (e.g. Lebow,Saks, Willson 2004)real money demand depends on nominal interest rates (Sriram2001 provides a survey)
59 / 60
Introduction Data Moments SVARs Exercises VAR based evidence Long run e�ects of monetary policy
Takeaways
To build good monetary models we need empirical evidence onmain (real and nominal) macro variablesThere is a lot of empirical evidence on business cycle behaviorbased on moments, e.g.:
consumption, investment are stronly and in�ation mildlyprocyclicalconsumption is less volatile than outputin�ation is persistent
We also have empirical evidence on the e�ects of monetarypolicy from VAR models
monetary contraction lowers output and in�ation (withsubstantial lags)
Finaly, we also have evidence on long-run e�ects of monetarypolicy
under normal conditions (no hyperin�ation, no persistentde�ation) monetary policy is neutral
60 / 60