monetary and fiscal policies during the next...

29
OXYGEN EVENTS CONFERENCE GALA PERFORMANCE 2017 MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICIES DURING THE NEXT RECESSION - THE CASE OF ROMANIA - BUCHAREST 17 th NOVEMBER 2017 Ph.D. Andrei RĂDULESCU Senior Economist, Banca Transilvania Researcher, Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy

Upload: ngotuong

Post on 08-Apr-2019

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

OXYGEN EVENTS CONFERENCE

GALA PERFORMANCE 2017

MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICIES DURING THE NEXT RECESSION

- THE CASE OF ROMANIA -

BUCHAREST

17th NOVEMBER 2017

Ph.D. Andrei RĂDULESCU

Senior Economist, Banca Transilvania

Researcher, Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy

MOTTO(S)

“There have been three great inventions since the beginning of time: fire, the wheel, and

central banking.”

Will Rogers

“Victorians heard with grave attention that the Bank Rate had been raised. They did not

know what it meant. But they knew that it was an act of extreme wisdom.”

John Kenneth Galbraith

"3.0 percent means 3.0 percent and not 3.2 percent.“

Theo Waigel

"The four most dangerous words in finance are 'this time is different'.”

Martin Wolf

CONTENT

I. INTRODUCTION

II. GLOBAL AND EUROPEAN MACROECONOMIC CLIMATE

III. ROMANIAN ECONOMY IN THE POST-CRISIS CYCLE

IV. POLICY-MIX IN ROMANIA

V. BT MACROECONOMIC SCENARIO FOR ROMANIA

VI. CONCLUSIONS

INTRODUCTION

END-OF-CYCLE POLICY-MIX CHALLENGES

The accumulation of maturity signs for the global post-crisis cycle

Romanian economy highly integrated with the EU economic cycle

Strong divergence between the overheating consumption and sluggish investments

The acceleration of the economy accompanied by the return of twin deficits

An expansionary and pro-cyclical, but unsustainable policy-mix

At present there lacks maneuver room in case of shocks

A rebalance of the policy-mix starting 2018 very likely

Several challenges in terms of real economic convergence and development

GLOBAL AND EUROPEAN MACROECONOMIC CLIMATE

STRONG GLOBAL MACRO-FINANCIAL CLIMATE

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56A

pr-

13

Ju

n-1

3

Au

g-1

3

Oct

-13

Dec

-13

Feb

-14

Ap

r-14

Ju

n-1

4

Au

g-1

4

Oct

-14

Dec

-14

Feb

-15

Ap

r-15

Ju

n-1

5

Au

g-1

5

Oct

-15

Dec

-15

Feb

-16

Ap

r-16

Ju

n-1

6

Au

g-1

6

Oct

-16

Dec

-16

Feb

-17

Ap

r-17

Ju

n-1

7

Au

g-1

7

Real economy vs. financial economy

PMI Composite MSCI Global (rhs)

Source: Bloomberg

US ECONOMY – THE MATURITY OF THE CYCLE

-1.0%

-0.5%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

195

3

195

5

195

7

195

9

196

1

196

3

196

5

196

7

196

9

197

1

197

3

197

5

197

7

197

9

198

1

198

3

198

5

198

7

198

9

199

1

199

3

199

5

199

7

199

9

20

01

20

03

20

05

20

07

20

09

20

11

20

13

20

15

20

17

Labor productivity and employment in US

Labor productivity (%, YoY) Employment (%, YoY)

Source: BT based on US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)

EU ECONOMY – AT THE PEAK OF THE CYCLE

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Ma

y-1

3

Sep

-13

Ja

n-1

4

Ma

y-1

4

Sep

-14

Ja

n-1

5

Ma

y-1

5

Sep

-15

Ja

n-1

6

Ma

y-1

6

Sep

-16

Ja

n-1

7

Ma

y-1

7

Sep

-17

Investor confidence in Euro Zone

Source: Sentix

THE END OF DELEVERAGING IN EUROPE

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

199

6

199

7

199

8

199

9

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

Domestic credit to private sector / GDP (%)

Euro Zone Romania

Source: Eurostat, NBR, BT

INCREASING CONVERGENCE IN EUROLAND

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

199

6

199

7

199

8

199

9

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

Standard deviation for GDP/capita in Euroland

Cyclical component Structural component (rhs)

Source: own estimates based on the methodology, using Eurostat, AMECO databases

UNSUSTAINABLE MONETARY DIVERGENCE

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3J

an

-01

Au

g-0

1

Ma

r-0

2

Oct

-02

Ma

y-0

3

Dec

-03

Ju

l-0

4

Feb

-05

Sep

-05

Ap

r-0

6

No

v-0

6

Ju

n-0

7

Ja

n-0

8

Au

g-0

8

Ma

r-0

9

Oct

-09

Ma

y-1

0

Dec

-10

Ju

l-11

Feb

-12

Sep

-12

Ap

r-13

No

v-1

3

Ju

n-1

4

Ja

n-1

5

Au

g-1

5

Ma

r-16

Oct

-16

Ma

y-1

7

Dec

-17

Monetary policy rate differential (FED vs. ECB)

Source: Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, BT forecasts

ROMANIAN ECONOMY IN THE POST-CRISIS CYCLE

ROMANIA – THE CHAMPION OF GROWTH IN EU

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

199

6

199

7

199

8

199

9

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

GDP (%, YoY)

Euro Zone Romania

Source: Eurostat, BT forecasts

Romanian GDP accelerated to 5.9% YoY in 1H2017 (and 7% YoY during 9M2017),

the highest paces since 2008, evolution supported by the expansionary policy-mix

Household consumption up by 7.6% YoY, due to the increase of the real

disposable income, the dynamics of the credit markets and the wealth effect

However, the fixed investments contracted by 0.3% YoY in 1H2017, given the

increase of the labor costs, the decline of the public investments and the policy-

mix related uncertainties and distortions

Negative contribution of the net foreign demand

The intensification of the twin deficits

Unemployment at record low levels

The inflexion of the YoY CPI dynamics

NBR ready to start a new monetary cycle

THE PEAK OF THE CYCLE

STRONG CONSUMPTION vs. LOW INVESTMENTS

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

2Q

05

4Q

05

2Q

06

4Q

06

2Q

07

4Q

07

2Q

08

4Q

08

2Q

09

4Q

09

2Q

10

4Q

10

2Q

11

4Q

11

2Q

12

4Q

12

2Q

13

4Q

13

2Q

14

4Q

14

2Q

15

4Q

15

2Q

16

4Q

16

2Q

17

Private consumption vs. fixed investments (%, YoY)

Investițiile productive (%, an/an) Consumul privat (%, an/an)

Source: Eurostat, AMECO, INS

IT&C – THE STAR OF THE ECONOMY

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

1Q0

0

4Q

00

3Q

01

2Q

02

1Q0

3

4Q

03

3Q

04

2Q

05

1Q0

6

4Q

06

3Q

07

2Q

08

1Q0

9

4Q

09

3Q

10

2Q

11

1Q12

4Q

12

3Q

13

2Q

14

1Q15

4Q

15

3Q

16

2Q

17

Value added by sector (%, YoY, MA4)

Industry Trade, transport, HORECA IT&C

Source: National Institute of Statistics (NIS)

RETURN OF TWIN DEFICITS

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

GDP, public finance and current account

GDP (%, YoY) Budget deficit (% GDP) Current account deficit (% GDP)

Source: AMECO, IMF, Banca Transilvania forecasts

LABOR MARKETS (OVER)HEATING

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20J

an

-07

Ap

r-0

7J

ul-

07

Oct

-07

Ja

n-0

8A

pr-

08

Ju

l-0

8O

ct-0

8J

an

-09

Ap

r-0

9J

ul-

09

Oct

-09

Ja

n-1

0A

pr-

10J

ul-

10O

ct-1

0J

an

-11

Ap

r-11

Ju

l-11

Oct

-11

Ja

n-1

2A

pr-

12J

ul-

12O

ct-1

2J

an

-13

Ap

r-13

Ju

l-13

Oct

-13

Ja

n-1

4A

pr-

14J

ul-

14O

ct-1

4J

an

-15

Ap

r-15

Ju

l-15

Oct

-15

Ja

n-1

6A

pr-

16J

ul-

16O

ct-1

6J

an

-17

Ap

r-17

Labor markets climate

The real wage (MA12, %, YoY) Unemployment rate (%, MA12)

Source: Romanian Statistics Office (INS), Banca Transilvania estimates

POLICY-MIX IN ROMANIA

CONVERGENCE GOES ON … WITH LOWER PACE

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

199

6

199

7

199

8

199

9

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

The dynamics of the structural component of GDP/capita (YoY)

Romania Euro Area

Source: the results of the methodology applied by using data from Eurostat and AMECO

STRONG PRO-CYCLICAL FISCAL POLICY

-7%

-6%

-5%

-4%

-3%

-2%

-1%

0%

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

Output gap vs. structural budget deficit

Output gap (pp) Structural budget deficit (% GDP) (rhs)

Source: the results of the methodology applied by using data from Eurostat and AMECO

AN EXPANSIONARY MONETARY POLICY

Source: the results of the methodology applied by using data from Eurostat , NBR, Bloomberg

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

TAYLORRATE NBRRATE

NBR rate vs. Taylor rule rate

MACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIA AT RISK AGAIN

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

198

019

81

198

219

83

198

419

85

198

619

87

198

819

89

199

019

91

199

219

93

199

419

95

199

619

97

199

819

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

102

011

20

122

013

20

142

015

20

162

017

Investments – Savings differential (% GDP)

Sursa: IMF, October 2017

BT MACROECONOMIC SCENARIO FOR ROMANIA

A LANDING IN SIGHT

CONCLUSIONS

MANEUVER ROOM NEEDED FOR NEXT CRISIS

A policy-mix rebalancing needed in order to build maneuver room for the end of cycle

The financing costs would be higher than forecasted in the mid-run if the rebalancing

is postponed

The degree of freedom in terms of monetary policy is relatively low, due to the strong

macro-financial integration of Romania with the Euroland and the high speed of

capital flows, in a context of unprecedented expansionary ECB policy

Without a rethink of the fiscal policy there increases the risks for Excessive Deficit

Procedure, with negative consequences for the sovereign rating

A stronger coordination of monetary and fiscal policies important to avoid boom/bust

Structural reforms needed for sustainable development and for a successful

integration in OECD and Euro Area in the future

THANK YOU!

Ph. D. Andrei RĂDULESCU

E-mail: [email protected]

Tel: (004) 0730 727 516