molten carbonate fuel cell overview
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
1/15
MCFC
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells
Technology and Market
Overview
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
2/15
1. Introduction Fuel cell converts chemical energy to electrical energy
A fuel cell is different than a battery in that it does not
store energy, but produces energy from the input materialssuch as Hydrogen and Oxygen
First fuel cell was invented in 1839 by Sir William Grove
Not adopted early on due to high cost and technology barriers
NASA used fuel cells to generate power for space missionswhich renewed interest in fuel cell research
Fuel cell technology has now advanced to the point where
various types have begun to enter the market place.
Pike Research has estimated that the stationary fuel cell marketwill reach 50,000 MW by the year 2020(Prabhu, Rahul R., Staitonary Fuel Cell Market, Jan. 2013)
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
3/15
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell History
Both Solid Oxide and Molten Carbonate fuel cell research began
together with a divergence in the technologies during the 1950s
a. Emil Baur, H. Preis experimented with high temperature,
solid oxide electrolytes in the 1930s
b. O.Davtyan conducted further experiments in the 1940s
c. G. Broers, J. Ketelaar continued the solid oxide research, but
solid oxides of the day prevented any short term progress.To forge ahead, they turned their attention to electrolytes
consisting of molten carbonate salts.
d. By 1960, Broers and Ketelaar had a fuel cell that ran for six
months using and electrolyte that was a mixture of lithium,sodium and potassium carbonate.
e. Mid 1960s, Texas Instruments made MCFC for the US Army
which ranged in size between 100W and 1kW
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
4/15
1. Overview of Molten Carbonate Technology
Inputs : Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Carbon Dioxide
Outputs : Electrical Power, Water, and Heat
Applications are usually large stationary power plants
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
5/15
Anode material is based on
porous Nickel.
Original designs used solid
Nickel, but due to hightemperature operation, the Nickel
would degrade (sintering)
Nickel is now stabilized using
chromium or aluminum
Cathode material is NiO
High temperature operation
causes the NiO to dissolve A limiting factor for Molten
Carbonate fuel cell lifetime
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
6/15
Electrolyte is a molten mixture of
lithium and potassium or lithium
and sodium carbonates
High temperature operation ofaround 600C 700C forms a
highly conductive molten
electrolyte containing salts
formed by the carbonates A porous ceramic material LiAlO2
called the electrolyte matrix is
used in the electrolyte region
The stability of the LiAlO2 matrixis another limiting factor for fuel
cell lifetime. ( < 6 years )
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
7/15
Chemical Reactions :Anode : H2 + CO3
2- -> H2O + CO2 + 2e- (oxidation)
Cathode : 1/2O2 + CO2 + 2e- -> CO3
2- (reduction)
Net Reaction : H2 + 1/2O2 + CO2(cathode) -> H2O + CO2 (Anode)
Carbonate Ions transfer from the Cathode to the Anode throughthe electrolyte ( ion transfer )
The Cell potential : (Nernst equation)
The cell potential depends upon the
partial pressures of O2
, H2
, and H2O
The CO2 partial pressure may be the
same (electrolyte is invariant) or
different (contributes to cell potential
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
8/15
Cell voltages typically range from 0.6V to 1.1V Typical current densities range from 140 to 160 mA/cm^3
Fuels :
Hydrogen is input on the Anode side Oxygen is input on the Cathode side
Carbon Dioxide is a second input
on the Cathode side, but may be
recycled from the Anode output
CO2 may also be produced by
combusting the anode exhaust gas
which is mixed directly with thethe anode inlet gas
Outputs : Electrical Power, Water,
Heat, Cathode Gas
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
9/15
Advantages :a. The high operating temperature improves chemical reaction
kinetics and so there is no need for noble metal catalysts (lower cost)
b. High temperature operation makes the MCFC resistant
to carbon monoxide contamination and as a result, mayuse alternate fuels such as natural gas or methane.
c. High efficiency, up to 60% electrical efficiency or when
used as combined heat and power (CHP) up to 80%
d. Clean energy and quiet operation
Disadvantages :
a. High temperature operation limits applications to stationary power
plants (slow startup time)b. Liquid electrolyte is difficult to work with
c. Short life span due to electrode and electrolyte degradation
d. Inject CO2 at cathode as carbonite ions consumed by anode reaction
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
10/15
2. Types of Applications and Market Status
Primary application is stationary power plants
a. Electrical Utilities
b. Industrial and distributed power generationc. Military and Government (Post Office)
Large systems : typically 250kW to 3MW
Future application may include ship power plants
a. Navy and civilian shipping
Early stationary power plant installations
a. Miramar Marine Corps Air Station (San Diego, 1997)
operated a 250 kW MCFC prototype power plantb. Santa Clara, 1997, Energy Research Corp. operated a
2MW demonstration power plant (cosponsored by DOE)
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
11/15
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) Market Overview
The commercialization of MCFC technology is still in its infancy
US manufacturers : Fuel Cell Energy and GenCell Corp. (CT)
European manufacturers : MTU Friedrichshafen and CFC Solutions
Japanese manufacturer : Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries
Korean manufacturers : KEPCO/ POSCO Power, Doosan HI
Total fuel cell market (all types) exceeded $1 billion in 2012
About half of fuel cell shipments have been stationary fuel cells, Since MCFC technology applications are large, stationary power
plants, the number of units shipped are low, but the equivalent power
generated is high. For example, when comparing number of units
shipped per year between various fuel cell technologies, MCFC is onthe order of tens of units shipped, but the annual power generation
capacity is around half of the total power capacity shipped for
stationary power plants.
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
12/15
Number of fuel cell units shipped globally in 2013 was 50,050 units
PEMFC is leading fuel cell technology with 88.6% of total units shipped
and 48.6% of power capacity shipped (mobile and stationary)
Stationary applications account for 57% of total capacity in 2013
MCFC accounts for about half of the stationary market( Grand View Research, Inc. , 2014 ) (CAGR for MCFC ~ 56%, 2014 2020)
Molton Carbonate Fuel Cell shipments by Power (MegaWatts)
year MCFC Total FC Stationary Ratio
2009 18.00 35.40 0.51
2010 7.70 35.00 0.22
2011 44.50 81.40 0.552012 62.00 124.90 0.50
2013 91.90 186.90 0.49
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
160.00
180.00
200.00
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
MCFC Yearly Shipments (MegaWatts)
MCFC Total FC Stationary
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.400.50
0.60
2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014
Percentage of MCFC to Total FC shipped(Power Capacity)
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
13/15
MCFC power plant installation cost ~ $ 4,000 / kW
About 2x the cost of Gas Turbine and 3x cost of Reciprocating Engine
Feasibility study by NREL compared installation costs of several
competing power generation technologies
3. Cost Targets
42454375
1896
1342
MCFC PAFC GAS TURBINE RECIPROCATING ENGINE
Installed Cost by Technology ( $ per kW )
Company Model Technology Installed Cost
FCE Direct Fuel Cell 1500 MCFC $4,245/kW
Doosan Power Pure Cell 400 PAFC $4,375/kW
Solar Mercury 50 gas turbine $1,896/kW
Caterpillar C3250 reciprocating engine $1,342/kW
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
14/15
4. Key Challenges For MCFC technology to be competitive in the power generation market,
the installed cost per kilowatt will have to drop to under $2000/kW
Further research to increase the power density of MCFC technology
a. Increase the operating temperatureb. Increase ionic conductivity of the electrolyte
c. Decrease the polarization losses of the electrodes
Further research to increase the lifespan of Molten Carbonate fuel cells
a. Improve structural stability of Ni-base anodes
b. Reduce NiO dissolution of the cathode
c. Reduce particle growth in the LiAlO2 electrolyte matrix
d. Reduce electrolyte evaporation ratee. Improve electrolyte structure ( ~ 70% cell ohmic losses )
Cost reductions with volume manufacture
Doubling orders from suppliers may reduce costs ~ 20%
-
7/26/2019 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Overview
15/15
Installation and Conditioning
After manufacture, the fuel cell must be conditioned. Under controlled
conditions, the fuel cell is brought up to temperature to melt the electrolyte
and condition the electrolyte matrix. Currently, this process takes about 2
weeks after which the fuel cell can be delivered to the customer.
The fuel cell is then assembled into the power plant at the customer site
after which operation is verified and the power plant is commissioned. The
total cost of this conditioning, installation, and commissioning process isestimated at $700/kW. At higher production volumes, it is estimated that
$200/kW could be saved on this process. Further cost reductions to this
process could make a significant contribution to MCFC feasibility.