modulor overview pod vs traditional
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Strategy team
Modulor business overview
7th February 2012
![Page 2: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CONTENTS
Introduction About MODULOR Transition: In–situ to Pod Cost comparisons: In-situ vs Pod The process from concept to mock up The site implications, challenges and advantages Factory Tour
![Page 3: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Modulor Modulor is the offsite manufacturing
arm of the Laing O’Rourke group based in Dubai UAE. The business has a track record of delivering pre engineered modules across the UAE stretching back to 2005 with the first “bathroom pods” being manufactured and installed into the Atlantis hotel.
Employing modern methods of manufacture the modularisation techniques divide complex elements into manageable units which promote ‘right first time’ installation, leading to more predictable budgets and time planning, as well as ensuring a safer, cleaner and more productive site.
Based in Jebel Ali, the factory has a capacity of around 150 units per week and offers its clients a “one stop shop” and has become the manufacturer of choice for numerous prestigious projects across the UAE and GCC.
![Page 4: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Transition: In-Situ to Pod
![Page 5: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Transition: In-Situ to Pod
Early intervention in the process Commitment of the Main Contractor/Client Early involvement of MEP contractor Openness on budget and clarity for final finishes Mock up for both pod and riser connectivity Value engineering built in from day one Structure and design intent for fire and sound Site logistics and pod routes
![Page 6: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
COST COMPARISON
IN-SITU
PODVS
![Page 7: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
COST COMPARISON
POD Vs TRADITIONAL BATHROOM
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
BASE WATERPROOFING WALLS TEMPORARYDOORS
SURFACE FINISHES SANITARY ITEMS SPECIAL PURPOSEFIXTURES
MEP SERVICES TESTING &PROTECTION
INSTALLATION
BUILD COMPONENT
CO
ST (A
ED)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
CUM
ULAT
IVE
COST
(AED
)
POD
TRADITIONAL BATHROOM
TOTAL POD COST
TOTAL TRADITIONAL BATHROOMCOST
24% Cost difference
![Page 8: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
PROCESS FROM CONCEPT TO MOCK-UP
![Page 9: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Production Process
![Page 11: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Pre cast base slab with integrated drainage
![Page 12: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Setting out and line and leveling the base
![Page 13: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Frame assembly LGS
![Page 14: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Composite materials
![Page 15: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Pre cut and preparation
![Page 16: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Offline assembly
![Page 17: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MEP first fix and test
![Page 18: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
A view inside the finished pod
![Page 19: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Final PDI and QA sign off
![Page 20: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
THE SITE IMPLICATIONS, CHALLENGES AND ADVANTAGES
![Page 21: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Site Implications / Challenges
![Page 22: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Site Implications / Challenges
![Page 23: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Site Implications / Challenges
![Page 24: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Site Implications / Challenges
![Page 25: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Site Implications / Challenges
Internal Platform For Disabled Pod Only
![Page 26: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Site Implications / Challenges
Understanding the interfaces with the building and structural design
BIM modeling and 3D overlays The MEP coordination and interface with the pod Logistics and product handling The pod route Delivery and sequence planning
![Page 27: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
PROJECT OVERVIEWAL ZEINA, AL RAHA BEACH DEVELOPMENTABU DHABI
Al Zeina project is a 1221 dwelling residential project in Abu Dhabi UAE; the overall project value is approximately 550 Million GBP. The project team submitted a report to the client (ALDAR Properties) to demonstrate the benefits of using bathroom pods (5,024 No) as opposed to the traditional in situ bathrooms. The report illustrated the benefits that would be achieved on Cost, Quality and Programme. ALDAR approved the proposal and the following are the quantified benefits derived from this decision.
![Page 28: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Built up area: 730,000m² Client: Aldar PropertiesValue: AED 3.3 Billion (£)589MSize of Site: 133,000m²No. of Residences: 1221No. of Precincts: 8No. of Pods: 5024
![Page 29: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
AL Zeina – Project Statistics
Cost Saving 13 %. Pods client programme 48 weeks, In situ bathroom
programme 68 weeks (20 weeks saving on the bathrooms programme).
Actual delivery programme 40 weeks (actual saving total 28 weeks on the bathrooms programme).
Total labour on site 150 at peak as opposed to 1,062 for the in situ bathroom option.
Factory assured quality, saving on the overall snagging time for the full project has been projected at over 450,000 man hours (3 men for 3 days (30 hours) x 5024 bathrooms.
![Page 30: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Customer Feedback
Tim KellyProject Leader, Aldar Laing O’Rourke
“To be able to complete over 5000 modular bathrooms in 10 months and to an extremely high standard of finish, using a minimum of on site resource is unprecedented and provided the project with a massive advantage and is testament to the dedication of Dave and his Modulor team.
I feel that the quality of the product is superior and this view is shared throughout the Consultant and Development teams. This result would not have been achieved with in-situ based solutions.”
![Page 31: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
LIST OF COMPLETED AND CURRENT PROJECTS
![Page 32: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
LIST OF COMPLETED AND CURRENT PROJECTS
![Page 33: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Advantages over traditional In-Situ Construction
Shorter and predictable build time with cost certainty upfront. Room completion taken off construction critical path. Factory controlled consistent quality built into the process and
product. Factory testing promotes consistent interface with site MEP
operations & reduces commissioning time. Vehicle movements reduced by up to 90% (typical). Improved Health & Safety performance. Sustainability and waste reduction 1.5% Vs 7% on site.
![Page 34: Modulor Overview Pod vs Traditional](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050914/577cce6d1a28ab9e788e0ad4/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
FACTORY TOUR