module 3 of 4 stormwater management design review

204
Stormwater Management Design Review NJ DEP Division of Watershed Protection and Restoration October 12, 2021 Module 3 of 4

Upload: others

Post on 10-Dec-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Management Design ReviewNJ DEP Division of Watershed Protectionand Restoration

October 12, 2021

Module 3 of 4

Page 2: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

2

Agenda(cont’d. on next slide)

Module 3No. Subject Duration

1 How to Review a Project 1 (xx minutes)Goal 1: Learn to identify which design and performance standards must be

met on siteGoal 2: Learn how to review for compliance with the GI, stormwater runoff

quantity and water quality, and groundwater recharge standardsGoal 3: Learn how to review BMPs for compliance with the design criteria in

the BMP Manual

2 How to Review a Project 2 (xx minutes)Goal 1: Learn how to review BMPs for compliance with the design criteria

in the BMP Manual

Goal 2: Calculate Detention Time

Goal 3: Learn how to review the safety requirements

Goal 4: MTD Design

Goal 5: Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

Page 3: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

3

Agenda

Module 3 (cont’d.)No. Subject Duration

3 Groundwater Mounding (xx minutes)Goal 1: Learn the requirements under N.J.A.C. 7:8Goal 2: Understand the concepts of groundwater moundingGoal 3: Learn about the methods of calculationGoal 4: Review examples of groundwater mounding analyses

- Quiz 3 and Review (xx minutes)

Page 4: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

REVIEWA PROJECT 1

HOW TO

4

Minesh Patel and Anthony RobalikNJDEP Division of Watershed Protection and Restoration

SWMDR Training Module 3October 12, 2021

Page 5: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Presentation Goals

• Learn to identify the design and performance standards that must be met onsite

• Learn how to review applications for compliance with the green infrastructure, water quantity, water quality, and groundwater recharge standards

• Learn how to review BMPs for compliance with the design criteria in the BMP Manual

5

Goals

Page 6: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Presentation Layout

Review Checklist: Pp. 14 – 18 of Chapter 3.4 in the Tier A Guidance Document at

https://www.nj.gov/dep/dwq/pdf/Tier_A/Tier_A_Chapter_3-4.pdf

6

Municipal Guidance Document:

Page 7: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

7

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

Page 8: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Checking Application

• Pre- and post-construction site plans

• Pre- and post-construction grading plans

• Stormwater report with calculations

• Details of BMPs

• Maintenance plan

8

The applicant needs to submit, at a minimum…

Page 9: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Reading the Report

• Existing conditions

• Proposed conditions

• Subdrainage areas and offsite discharge point(s)

• Disturbance and change in regulated impervious surface and change in regulated motor vehicle surface for each subdrainage area

• Soil survey and testing information

9

Site description

Page 10: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Reading the Report

• What’s required

o BMP design details

o Hydraulic and hydrologic calculations

o Groundwater recharge information

o Groundwater mounding analysis if infiltration is proposed

10

Design and Performance Standards

Page 11: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Reading the Report

• Time of concentration – calculated, not assumed (see Chapter 5)

• Routing calculations for stormwater runoff quality and the 2-, 10- and 100-year storm events

• Hydrographs

• Groundwater recharge spreadsheet

• Groundwater mounding analysis if infiltration is proposed

11

Hydraulic and Hydrologic Calculations

Page 12: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

1. Has the project disturbed one acre or more since February 2, 2004?

2. Has the project increased regulated impervious coverage by ¼ acre or more since February 2, 2004?

3. Has the project increased regulated motor vehicle surface by ¼ acre or more since March 2, 2021?

4. Is there a combination of 2 and 3 above that totals an area of ¼ acre or more?

5. What is the SCO’s definition of major development?

12

Is the project a major development?

Page 13: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Residential Site Improvement Standards:

o 1 acre or more of disturbance (N.J.A.C. 5:21)

• Stormwater Control Ordinance:

o N.J.A.C. 7:8 Definition of Major Development

o More stringent standard adopted by municipality

• NJDEP Division of Land Use Regulation:

o 1 acre or more of disturbance

o ¼ acre or more increase in impervious coverage

13

“Major Development” definitions:

Page 14: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Watershed

• Category 1

• Flooding problems

• Water quality impairments or TMDLs

• Is the site in a regulated area?

o Flood Hazard Area

o CAFRA

o Freshwater Wetlands

o Highlands

• Is the site in the Pinelands?

14

Where does it discharge to?

Page 15: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Green Infrastructure

• Stormwater runoff quantity control

• Stormwater runoff quality

• Groundwater recharge

15

Design and Performance Standards for Major Developments:

Page 16: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

16

When may variances or waivers

granted?

Page 17: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Variances – N.J.A.C. 7:8-4.6

• There may be instances where site constraints for using green infrastructure is technically impracticable to meet design and performance standards of a major development project.

• The rule allows variances to be granted at the local level to provide mitigation options for those instances when it is technically impracticable to meet standards.

17

7:8-4.6 Variance from the design and performance standards for stormwater management measures

Page 18: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

18

Variances - N.J.A.C. 7:8-4.6

• Technically impracticable to meet any one or more of the design and performance standards on site; and

• The proposed design achieves maximum compliance with the design and performance standard

o Technical impracticable exists only when the standard can not be met for engineering, environmental, or safety reasons

Approval of a variance applies to the individual

drainage area and design and performance standard

Municipality may approve a variance if

the Applicant demonstrates:

Page 19: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

19

Variances – MitigationN.J.A.C. 7:8-4.6(a)3

Mitigation Requirements:

• Selected from municipal mitigation plan or proposed by applicant, provided it meets the criteria within the municipal mitigation plan

• Be approved no later than preliminary or final site plan approval of the major development

• Be located in the same HUC 14 as the portion of the major development that was granted the variance

• Be constructed prior to or concurrent with the major development

• Comply with the green infrastructure standards at N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.3

• Applicant or entity assuming maintenance responsibility for the associated major development shall be responsible for maintenance, with a written agreement submitted to the review agency

Approved variance must be submitted to county review

agency and DEP within 30 days of approval

Page 20: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

20

Variances – MitigationN.J.A.C. 7:8-4.6(a)3

If variance is from green infrastructure standards

• Mitigation project must provide green infrastructure BMPs to manage an equivalent or greater area and amount of impervious surface than the area of major development granted the variance

• Vegetative filter strips and grass swales excluded as mitigation measures

• GI BMPs used for mitigation must be sized to manage the Water Quality Design Storm (at a minimum)

• GI BMPs used for mitigation are subject to the specified drainage area limitations

Page 21: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

21

Variances – MitigationN.J.A.C. 7:8-4.6(a)3

If variance is from groundwater recharge standards

• Mitigation project must equal or exceed GW recharge deficit

If variance is stormwater runoff quality standards

• Mitigation project must provide sufficient TSS removal to equal or

exceed the deficit resulting from the variance

If variance is stormwater runoff quantity standards

• Mitigation project must provide equivalent peak flow rate

attenuation upstream and discharge to the same water course

Page 22: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Construction of underground utility line, if revegetated upon completion

• Construction of aboveground utility line, if existing conditions are maintained to MEP

• Construction of public pedestrian access, if made of permeable materials and no greater than 14 ft. wide

22

Linear development exemptions exist for…

Page 23: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Enlargement of existing public roadway or railroad, construction or enlargement of public pedestrian access, if applicant demonstrates:

o Public need for project that can’t be met another way

o D&P Standards met to maximum extent practicable

o Meeting the standards would require condemning existing in-use structures

o Applicant does not have and cannot get rights to other lands for mitigation

23

Waivers from strict compliance with N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.3 exist for…

Page 24: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Stormwater Runoff Quantity, if in Tidal Flood Hazard Area and flooding will not be increased

• Stormwater Runoff Quality, if site has NJPDES permit with specific effluent limit

• Groundwater Recharge, for previously developed areas in urban redevelopment area

24

When Design and Performance Standards do not apply…

Page 25: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• “Previously developed portions of areas:

o Delineated on State Plan Policy Map as:

• Planning Area 1

• Designated Centers, Cores, or Nodes

o CAFRA Centers, Cores, or Nodes

o Urban Enterprise Zones

o Urban Coordinated Council Empowerment Neighborhoods

25

Urban Redevelopment Area

Page 26: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Mitigation Plan

• Construction of utility lines, public pedestrian access

• Enlargement of public roadway, railroad, public pedestrian access

• Urban Redevelopment Area

• NJPDES Permits w/ discharge limits

• Tidal Flood Hazard Area

26

Situations that may be eligible for variances/waivers (summary):

Page 27: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

27

GREEN

INFRASTRUCTURE

Page 28: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

GI in the NJ BMP Manual

28

Chapter 9: GI BMPs

Page 29: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Green Infrastructure StandardsN.J.A.C. 7:8-5.3(b)

29

Best Management Practice Maximum Contributory Drainage Area

Dry Wells 1 acre

GI Manufactured Treatment

Device (MTDs)

2.5 acres

Pervious Paving Systems Area of additional inflow cannot exceed

3 times the area occupied by the BMP

Small-scale Bioretention Systems 2.5 acres

Small-scale Infiltration Basins 2.5 acres

Small-scale Sand Filters 2.5 acres

Contributory Drainage Area Limitation (N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.3(b))

Page 30: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

GI in the NJ BMP Manual

30

Chapter 10: GI BMPs for Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• May only be used for Groundwater Recharge and/or Stormwater

Runoff Quality, when applicable, with a Waiver or Variance from

N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.3

Page 31: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Non-GI in the NJ BMP Manual

31

Chapter 11: Non-GI BMPs

• May only be used for Groundwater Recharge, Stormwater Runoff

Quantity and/or Stormwater Runoff Quality, when applicable, with

a Waiver or Variance from N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.3

Page 32: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

32

STORMWATER RUNOFF

QUANTITY

Page 33: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Protects against flooding

• Can be met in three different ways

• Must be met for each point of analysis

33

The water quantity standard…

Page 34: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Allows reviewer to identify where stormwater flows

• Required to determine drainage areas and time of concentration

34

Topography

Page 35: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Site plans must show:

o Existing and proposed contours

o Point of analysis

o Tc flow path

o Drainage area to each point of analysis

35

Topography

Page 36: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• For sites with multiple drainage areas that don’t converge or have very different cover:

o Each DA should be calculated separately

o Each DA should have separate Tc calculation

o Each DA should meet water quantity standard

36

Topography

Page 37: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

37

Page 38: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Reviewer needs to verify:

o All drainage areas are delineated correctly

o Verify that proper time of concentration flow path is used

o Verify that time of concentration is calculated properly

38

Topography

Page 39: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Look for depressions on existing site

• Water ponds in natural depressions

• Ignoring depression storage will overestimate existing discharge volumes and peak flows

39

Topography

Page 40: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

40

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

Page 41: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Should be clearly marked on plans

• Should be specific: forest, grass, bare soil, impervious coverage

• Include any existing BMPs

41

Land Cover

Page 42: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Reviewer needs to verify:

o What’s on site plan matches actual conditions

o Land cover used in the calculations is the most pervious cover that has existed in past 5 years

42

Land Cover

Page 43: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Soils on-site must be determined

• Required information: HSG and soil type

• Should be submitted with report

• Best way to find soil info is NRCS Web Soil Survey:o https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htmo Google “Web Soil Survey”

43

Soils

Page 44: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Sometimes cannot be found in soil survey

• If information not available, two ways to find HSG:o Default hydrologic soil groups

o Soil testing

• Information on both methods in Chapter 12

44

Soils

Page 45: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Poor soil information is one of the most common review issues encountered

• Soil information can make or break a stormwater management design

• Often the best practice to review soil testing first

45

Soils

Page 46: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

✓ Identify if the roughness sheet flow coefficient for woods is 0.4 or less.

✓ Determine if the time of concentration in preconstruction condition is calculated appropriately. It is important that existing times of concentration are not underestimated.

46

Stormwater Management Review Checklist

Page 47: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Required for both Rational/Modified Rational Methods and NRCS Method

• Calculated in accordance with the NEH and also Chapter 5 of the BMP Manual

47

Time of Concentration

Page 48: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Review sheet flow, shallow concentrated flow, and channel flow inputs

o Maximum allowable Manning’s roughness coefficient is 0.4 in NJ

• Pre-construction Tc should always be proven by calculation

• Post-construction Tc can no longer be assumed as an allowable minimum for the NRCS method

48

Tc summary…

Page 49: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

✓ Identify if the runoff from impervious and pervious surfaces are calculated separately and not with a weighted average of the CN numbers for impervious surface and pervious surface.

✓ Determine if the curve number selection makes sense.

✓ If rational method is used, determine if the selected runoff coefficient makes sense and the source of the runoff coefficient is provided

49

Stormwater Management Review Checklist

Page 50: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

✓ Review the applicability of the selected modelling method

o Rational Method for peak flows & Modified Rational Method for hydrographs

o NRCS Method

50

Acceptable Methods of Calculations

Page 51: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Used to calculate amount of runoff caused by given precipitation

• Curve numbers – NRCS Method

• Runoff Coefficients – Rational/Modified Rational

51

Curve Numbers/Runoff Coefficients

Page 52: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Stormwater report and plans should clearly show area for each different land cover and HSG

• Both must always be based on “good” hydrologic condition

52

Curve Numbers/Runoff Coefficients

Page 53: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

53

Curve Numbers/Runoff Coefficients

Area (sf) Land Cover Soil TypeHydrologic

Soil Group

Curve

Number

38,173 Pavement Bucks silt loam B 98

24,689 Lawn Bucks silt loam B 61

14,787 Lawn Lehigh silt loam C 74

9,950 Forest Dunellen sandy

loam

A 30

2,654 Pavement Lehigh silt loam C 98

Page 54: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Curve numbers are available in NEH, Part 630, Chapter 9 Hydrologic Soil-Cover Complexes

• Runoff coefficient is available in Chapter 5

• Reviewer is responsible for ensuring that the designer’s chosen value is reasonable

54

Curve Numbers/Runoff Coefficients

Page 55: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Required to route pervious and impervious areas separately

• Never use a weighted average of pervious and impervious areaso Underestimates flow rates and volumes

• Subdrainage areas to a discharge point (point of analysis)o Peak flow rates from each subdrainage area cannot be

arithmetically added. Hydrographs of subdrainage areas shall be combined and the peak flow rate of the combined hydrograph shall be used at the discharge point

55

Runoff Routing

Page 56: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

✓ Identify if any existing depression areas are included in the model.

• Depressions and high permeability soils clearly provide stormwater management benefits

• Not possible to accurately calculate time of concentration

• Depression storage should be modeled as an existing basin in pre-development conditions

56

Dealing With Depression Storage

Stormwater Management Review Checklist

Page 57: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• If depression area is in middle of site:

o Model depression area

o Calculate time of concentration from depression outlet to point of interest

o Lag depression outflow hydrograph by calculated time of concentration

o Calculate time of concentration for remaining area and route it separately

57

Dealing With Depression Storage

Page 58: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

58

Dealing With Depression Storage

Page 59: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Determine time of concentration to depression area

• Calculate stage-storage data for depression area

• Model outlet from depression area as a weir

• Route contributory drainage area to depression area

59

Dealing With Depression Storage

Page 60: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

60

Dealing With Depression Storage

Page 61: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

61

Stormwater Quantity Control BMPs

Dealing With Depression Storage

Page 62: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

✓ Determine if the rainfall depth and intensity for 2-, 10-and 100-year storms are selected properly from NOAA’s partial duration data or NRCS’s county rainfall summary data.

✓ Determine if the appropriate rainfall distribution is used in the calculations.

62

Stormwater Management Review Checklist

Page 63: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• For NRCS Method:o 2-, 10- and 100-year, 24-hour storms (NOAA Precipitation

Frequency Data Server)o Water Quality Design Storm (BMP Manual Chapter 5)

• For Rational/Modified Rational Method:o 2-, 10- and 100-year, IDF Curves (NOAA Precipitation

Frequency Data Server)o Water Quality Design Storm Intensity-Duration Curve

(BMP Manual Chapter 5)

63

Rainfall Depth and Intensity

Page 64: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• NRCS developed other distributions for NJ in 2012:

o NOAA_C

o NOAA_D

• NJ BMP Manual requires use of these rainfall distributions when designing BMPs

• NOAA_C and NOAA_D already built into many stormwater modeling programs

64

Rainfall Distribution (NRCS Method only)

Page 65: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Applicant must show critical storage volume calculation

• Detention basin design must be based on storm event that results in critical storage volume

65

Design Storm Event (Modified Rational Method)

Page 66: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

✓ Identify if the DelMarVa unit hydrograph is used, if so, determine if the site meets the criteria for its use –coastal plain, flat topography, permeable soils, low imperviousness.

66

Stormwater Management Review Checklist

Page 67: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• SCS Unit Hydrograph may be acceptable throughout the entire state, but must be used outside coastal plain area

• DelMarVa Hydrograph is acceptable in the coastal plain area only

• Must use the same hydrograph in both pre and post conditions

67

Unit Hydrograph (NRCS Method only)

Page 68: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

68

Review compliance with the standards

Option 1Demonstrate that at no point does the post-development hydrograph exceed the pre-development hydrograph for the 2-, 10- and 100-year storms (N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.6)

• Applicant must submit pre- and post-development hydrographs

• Total runoff volume must be equal or lower in post-development as compared to pre-development

Page 69: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

69

Review compliance with option 1

Page 70: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

70

Review compliance with option 1

Page 71: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

Reduce the post-development peak flows to 50, 75, and 80% of pre-development peak flows for 2-, 10-, and 100-year storms (N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.6)

• Stormwater BMPs with detention function to provide storage volume and reduce the peak flow rate may be required

• Applicant must submit routing calculations

• Most commonly used option to meet stormwater runoff quantity control standard

71

Review compliance with the standards

Option 3:

Page 72: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Quantity Control BMPs

• Various GI BMPs can be designed to provide detention function:

72

BMPs with detention component providing storage and reducing peak flow rates

Chapter 9 BMPs:

o Cisterns

o Green roofs

o Pervious paving systems

o Small-scale bioretention

systems

o Small-scale infiltration basins

o Small-scale sand filters

Chapter 10 BMPs:

o Bioretention systems

o Infiltration basins

o Sand filters

o Standard constructed

wetlands

o GI Wet ponds

Page 73: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• The report shall provide routing calculations of all design storms for every subdrainage area

o Check if pervious surface and impervious surface are separately calculated

o Check NOAA rainfall distribution

o Check rainfall depth

o Check Tc

73

Review compliance with the standards

Option 3:

Page 74: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• The report shall provide routing calculations of the stormwater BMP for all design storms

o Check if exfiltration is used

o Check if the discharge from the orifice is within the reduced flow rate

o Check if the smallest orifice is 2.5” or larger

74

Review compliance with the standards

Option 3:

Page 75: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

• Exfiltration may be used in small-scale GI BMP routing calculations for 2, 10, 100-year storms

o See Chapter 5 for conditions to use exfiltration in the routings

• Allowing exfiltration in the routing calculation does not necessarily mean infiltration of the entire 2, 10, 100-year storms.

75

Review compliance with the standards

Option 3:

Page 76: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

o Check groundwater mounding analysis

o Check if discharge from the outlet structure will increase if mounding is higher than the bottom of BMP

76

Review compliance with the standards

Option 3:

Page 77: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quantity

o Small-scale GI BMPs in Table 5-1 and GI BMPs in Table 5-2 may be used to address the stormwater runoff quantity requirement

• Detention components can be incorporated to provide detention function which reduce peak flow rates.

• Detention components must be situated in the same location as small-scale GI BMP or GI BMP

o Detention space above the maximum water level of the water quality design storm, or

o Below the surface component of the BMP

Use of Detention Component in GI BMPs

Page 78: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

78

STORMWATER RUNOFF QUALITY

Page 79: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Remove TSS by 80%

• Remove nutrients to maximum extent feasible

• Applies at net increase of ¼ acre or more of

regulated motor vehicle surface

79

Design and Performance Standards

Page 80: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Removal rates apply to each on-site drainage area,

unless the runoff converges on-site

• Pursuant to FHACA Rules, runoff from WQDS

discharged within a 300-foot riparian zone must

reduce TSS by 95%

80

Design and Performance Standards

Page 81: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Regulated Motor Vehicle Surface:

o Any net increase in motor vehicle surface

o Existing motor vehicle surface that is currently receiving

water quality treatment, where the water quality

treatment will be modified or removed.

81

Design and Performance Standards

Page 82: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Pervious paving areas

o Often used to replace traditional pavement

o Considered regulated motor vehicle surface toward

the ¼ acre increase

o If designed properly, pervious paving systems can

provide required TSS removal

82

Design and Performance Standards

Page 83: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Rooftop runoff

o Not considered significant source of TSS

o Can be infiltrated using dry well

o Can be significant source of nutrients

o May require pretreatment – See design criteria in BMP

Manual

83

Design and Performance Standards

Page 84: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Design storm based on historic data

• Nonlinear rainfall distribution resulting in 1.25 inches of precipitation in 2 hours

• Relatively common and intense storm

• Designed to capture frequent storms that cause significant stormwater runoff pollution

84

Water Quality Design Storm

Page 85: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

85

Stormwater Runoff Quality

Water

Quality

Design

Storm

Page 86: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

86

Stormwater Runoff Quality

Water

Quality

Design

Storm

Page 87: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Water quality criteria met through implementation of Chapter 9 GI BMPs:

o Cisternso Drywellso Grass swaleso Green roofso GI MTDso Pervious paving systemso Small-scale bioretention systemso Small-scale infiltration basinso Small-scale sand filterso Vegetative filter strips

• NJ BMP Manual contains design criteria for the various Chapter 9 GI BMPs

87

BMPs for Meeting Water Quality

Page 88: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

88

% TSS and Nutrient Removal Rates for BMPs

BMP TSS RemovalRate

Phosphorus Removal Rate*

Nitrogen Removal Rate*

Bioretention Systems 80-90% 60% 30%

Standard Constructed Wetlands 90% 50% 30%

Extended Detention Basins 40-60% 20% 20%

Infiltration Basins 80% 60% 50%

Manufactured Treatment Devices 50% or 80% N/A N/A

Pervious Paving Systems 80% 60% 50%

Sand Filters 80% 50% 35%

Vegetative Filter Strips 60-80% 30% 30%

Wet Ponds 50-90% 50% 30%

Grass Swales ≤ 50% N/A N/A

Subsurface Gravel Wetlands 90% N/A 90%

Page 89: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Not all BMPs meet 80% TSS removal

• Can use multiple BMPs in series to achieve reduction

• For two BMPs in series: 𝑅 = 𝐴 + 𝐵 −𝐴𝑥𝐵

100

89

Water Quality BMPs in Series

Page 90: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• When using BMPs in series, arrange BMPs from upstream to downstream in:1. Ascending order of TSS removal rate2. Ascending order of nutrient removal rate3. By relative ease of sediment and debris removal

• Do not use two of same type of BMPs in series

Vegetative Filter Strip (60%)

Small-scale Infiltration Basin (80%)

Total % TSS Removal, 𝑅 = 60 + 80 – [(60*80)/100] = 92%

90

Water Quality BMPs in Series

Page 91: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Required on all major developments

• Shall be addressed to maximum extent feasible

• Some BMPs have adopted nutrient removals

• Nutrient removal often best performed through source control

91

Nutrient Removal

Page 92: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Stormwater Management rules require:

o Design BMPs in accordance with BMP Manual or

o Alternative designs if design engineer provides documentation demonstrating capability of alternative removal rates and methods

• Any approved alternatives must be submitted to the Department

92

Water Quality BMPs

Page 93: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Ensure water quality BMPs chosen are adequate to achieve required TSS removal rate

• Ensure small-scale GI BMPs from Table 5-1 are used unless a waiver or variance from NJAC 7:8-5.3 is obtained

• Ensure runoff from all drainage areas requiring water quality treatment is being collected and treated

• Ensure BMP design meets criteria under applicable BMP Manual subchapter

• Ensure a deed notice of the stormwater BMP is submitted for approval and recorded in county clerk's office prior to the commencement of construction

93

Reviewing for Water Quality Compliance

Page 94: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• BMPs must each drain within 72 hours of storm

o BMPs installed subject to pedestrian traffic, drain time is 24 hours

• In general, most GI BMPs require at least 2 ft separation from seasonal high water table

o Underdrain GI BMP needs 1 ft separation

o GI MTD is subject to manufacturer’s specification

94

Water Quality BMPs – General Design Criteria

Page 95: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Commonly used BMPs:

o Small-scale infiltration basins

o Small-scale bioretention systems

o GI Manufactured treatment devices

o Grass swales

o Pervious paving systems

95

Water Quality BMPs

Page 96: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

96

Page 97: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Designed to infiltrate runoff into subsoil

• 80% TSS removal rate

• Can also be used to meet the water quantity and groundwater recharge requirements

97

Small-scale Infiltration Basins

Page 98: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Must be designed to infiltrate Water Quality Design Storm volume

• Must meet infiltration permeability testing requirements in accordance with Chapter 12

• Maximum depth from WQDS of 24 inches

98

Small-scale Infiltration Basins –Design Criteria

Page 99: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Must include a 6 inch, AASHTO M-6 or ASTM C-33 sand layer

• Bottom of basin must be level and un-compacted

• Subsurface infiltration basins require 80% TSS pretreatment

• Design hydraulic conductivity of most restrictive soil horizon below basin bottom should be between 0.5 –10 inches/hour

99

Small-scale Infiltration Basins –Design Criteria

Page 100: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Designed for water quantity control but no outlet structure

• Underdrains or liners

• Topsoil or vegetation

• Standing water 72 hours after the precipitation stops

100

Small-scale Infiltration Basins –You Should Not See …

Page 101: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

101Courtesy of NJDOT

Stormwater Runoff Quality

Page 102: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

102

Page 103: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Thick soil bed and dense vegetation to enhance pollutant removal

• TSS removal rate based on types of plants and soil bed thickness

103

Small-scale Bioretention Systems

Page 104: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Vary in size from small rain gardens to basins

• Can be designed to infiltrate or to be underdrained

104

Small-scale Bioretention Systems

Page 105: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Must include a soil bed at 18 - 24 inches in depth

• Bioretention mix must consist of following, by volume:

o 85 - 95% sand (< 25% fine or very fine sand)

o No more than 15% silt and clay

o 2 - 5% clay

• Bioretention mix must be amended with 3 - 7% organics, by weight

105

Small-scale Bioretention Systems –Design Criteria

Page 106: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Maximum water quality depth of 12 in. for flat-bottomed systems

• Maximum water quality depth of 18 in. at down-gradient end of a bioretention swale

• Maximum bottom slope of 10% for bioretention swale

• Minimum density of vegetation of 85%

106

Small-scale Bioretention Systems –Design Criteria

Page 107: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Applies to any BMP designed to infiltrate runoff

o Small-scale infiltration basin

o Dry well

o Small-scale bioretention system (w/o underdrain)

o Small-scale sand filter (w/o underdrain)

107

Infiltration Criteria

Page 108: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Soil permeability must be tested

• Must apply a factor of 2 to any tested permeability

𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 =𝐹𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦

2

• Minimum design permeability of 0.5 inches/hour, maximum of 10 inches/hour

108

Infiltration Criteria

Page 109: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Must have at least 2 feet of separation from SHWT

• Depth to SHWT must be proven via soil testing

• Must assess groundwater mounding impacts

109

Infiltration Criteria

Page 110: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Protection of infiltration area from compaction and sedimentation during construction

• Post-construction soil testing to verify as-built conditions are sufficient to allow infiltration

110

Infiltration BMPs – What you should see

Page 111: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

111

More Information:

Stormwater Management UnitBureau of Flood Hazard and Stormwater Engineering

Watershed Engineering ElementDivision of Watershed Protection and Restoration

401 East State Street

PO Box 420, Mail Code 401-2B

Trenton, NJ 08625-420

Tel: 609-633-7021

www.njstormwater.org

Minesh [email protected]

Anthony [email protected]

Page 112: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

REVIEWA PROJECT 2

HOW TO

Changi WuNJDEP Division of Watershed Protection and Restoration

SWMDR Training Module 3October 12, 2021

Page 113: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Presentation Goals

2

Goals

Goal 1: Learn how to review BMPs for compliance

with the design criteria in the BMP ManualGoal 2: Calculate Detention Time

Goal 3: Learn how to review the safety requirements

Goal 4: MTD DesignGoal 5: Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

Page 114: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

3

Example: Small-Scale Bioretention System

Page 115: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Step 1: Calculate the runoff volume and peak flow rate for water quality design storm by using NRCS methodo 939 cf and 0.74 cfs

• Step 2: Sizing the pretreatmento In this case, a MTD is used for pretreatment by following the

MTD certification letter

4

Example: Small-Scale Bioretention System

Page 116: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Step 3: Run the routing calculation with exfiltrationo Infiltration area is initially set up as 600 sf

o Side slope is 3:1 (H:V)

o The size of surface areas and the dimensions of the basin at different heights can be calculated accordingly based on the slope

o The exfiltration rate is half of the tested saturated hydraulic conductivity of the most restrictive soil layer as described in Chapter 12• 1 in/hr is used for exfiltration rate

• Areas on the side slope cannot be used for exfiltration

• The discharge rate through the infiltration area shall be calculated:o 1 in/hr x 600 sf x 1/12 in/ft x 3,600 hr/sec = 0.01 cfs

5

Example: Small-Scale Bioretention System

Page 117: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Step 3: Run the routing calculation with exfiltration (Continued)

• Adjust the height of the first orifice to result in a water depth that only allows for infiltration of the water quality design storm

o 0.98 ft

• The runoff volume discharged through exfiltration is 939 cfs

• The drain time is the discharged volume through exfiltration divided by the exfiltration rate

o 18.78 hrs

6

Example: Small-Scale Bioretention System

Page 118: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

7

Example: Small-Scale Bioretention System

Page 119: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Step 4: Check the Separation from SHWT

o Lowest point of the basin is 3 ft below the existing ground level

o SHWT is 8 feet below the existing ground level

o SHWT is 5 feet from the lowest point of the basin

8

Example: Small-Scale Bioretention System

Page 120: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• Step 5: Groundwater Mounding Analysis

o 1 in/hr for recharge rate as the initial input

o Horizontal hydraulic conductivity rate is 1 times the recharge rate as the project is outside the coastal plain

o Use the drain time calculated in step 3 as the duration of infiltration

o Use half of the basin dimensions calculated in step 3 as input for x and y

9

Example: Small-Scale Bioretention System

Page 121: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Stormwater Runoff Quality

• The mounding height is 2.861 ft from the water table

• SHWT is 5 feet below the lowest point of the basin

• The mounding will reach to 2.139 feet below the lowest point of the basin

10

Example: Small-Scale Bioretention System

Page 122: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Water Quality

11

Page 123: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Extended Detention Basins

• Extended detention basins cannot be used for groundwater recharge

• TSS removal rate based on detention time

• Detention Time: time between when the maximum storage volume is achieved to when only 10% of the maximum volume remains

• Use Water Quality Design Storm for TSS removal rate calculation

12

Design and Performance Standards

Page 124: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

13

Water Quality

Page 125: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Water Quality

14

Courtesy of NJDOT

Extended Detention Basins – Design Example

Water Quality

Page 126: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Water Quality

15

Extended Detention Basins – Design Example

Water Quality

Page 127: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Water Quality

• Maximum storage: 0.832 acre-ft at 2.10 hrs

• 10% of maximum storage: 0.0832 acre-ft

16

Extended Detention Basins –

Design Example

Extended Detention Basins – Design Example

Water Quality

Page 128: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

17

Extended Detention Basins – Design Example

Water QualityWater Quality

Page 129: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

18

Extended Detention Basins – Design Example

Water Quality

• Maximum storage: 2.10 hr• Detention time ends at 17.85 hr• Detention time = 17.85 - 2.10 = 15.75 hr• TSS removal rate ≈ 47%

Page 130: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Wet Ponds

19

Page 131: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Wet Ponds

• Wet ponds (GI)o designed to maintain at least a 10-foot wide area of native

vegetation along at least 50 percent of the shoreline and to include a stormwater runoff retention component designed to capture stormwater runoff for beneficial reuse, such as irrigation

o used for water quantityo used for water quality only when a Waiver or Variance from

N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.3 is obtainedo BMP Chapter 10.5

• Wet Ponds (Non-GI)o used for water quantity and quality only when

a Waiver or Variance from N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.3 is obtainedo BMP Chapter 11.6

20

Two Different BMPs

Page 132: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Wet Ponds

• Minimum 0.25 acre permanent pool surface area

• Minimum ratio of the permanent pool volume to the Water Quality Design Storm volume is 1:1

• Minimum drainage area of 20 acres

• Requires very low permeability soils or an impermeable liner

21

Design Criteria

Page 133: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Wet Ponds

22

TSS Removal Rate

• Without extended detention time

o TSS removal rate is based on the ratio of volume in the permanent pool to the volume of the Water Quality Design Storm volume

o Ratio is from 1:1 to 3:1 for TSS removal rate from 50% to 80%

• Additional TSS removal up to 90% can be provided using extended detention

o Ratio of permanent pool volume to Water Quality Design Storm runoff volume (1:1 to 3:1) and

o Detention time (12 to 24 hours)

Page 134: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

23

Water Quality

Page 135: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

24

SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

Page 136: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Safety Requirement

25

Escape Provision NJAC 7:8-6.2

2.5 ft below

permanent water

level

1 to 1.5 ft above

permanent water

level

• Safety Ledges

o Required for basins having a permanent pool of water >2.5 ft

o Requires two steps

• Each step 4-6 ft wide

• 1st step 2.5 ft below permanent water level

• 2nd step 1 to 1.5 ft above permanent water level

Page 137: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

26

MANUFACTURED TREATMENT DEVICES (MTDs) DESIGN

Page 138: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

MTD Design

27

Green Infrastructure Guidance for MTDs (April 23, 2020)

For an MTD to be considered “green infrastructure” in accordance with the March 2, 2020 amendments to the Stormwater Management rules at N.J.A.C. 7:8, the MTD must meet the GI definition noted at amended N.J.A.C. 7:8-1.2.Specifically, the MTD shall (1) infiltrate into the subsoil; and/or (2) treat stormwater runoff through filtration by vegetation or soil.

Page 139: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

MTD Design

• Must be verified by NJCAT and certified by NJDEP

• Devices that are not currently certified by NJDEP cannot be used to meet the design and performance standards

• Sizing calculation in the certification letter

• http://www.njstormwater.org/treatment.html

• Maximum contributory drainage area of a GI MTD is 2.5 acres

28

Design and Performance Standards

Page 140: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

MTD Design

29

MTD Design must follow the design criteria and use only models listed in the Certification

• The maximum treatment flow rate (MTFR) for the manufactured treatment device (MTD) is calculated using the New Jersey Water Quality Design Storm (1.25 inches in 2 hrs) in N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.5. …

• The stormwater treatment unit shall be installed using the same configuration reviewed by NJCAT, and sized in accordance with the criteria specified in the certification

• Sizing configuration by the maximum treatment flow rate (MTFR) and maximum inflow impervious area, whichever results in the highest minimum configuration

Page 141: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

MTD Design

30

MTD Design must follow the design criteria and use only models listed in the Certification

Sample language in the Certification Letter settingthe

design criteria:

In order for an GI MTD to meet the definition of GI, the GI MTD

must treat stormwater runoff through filtration by vegetation. To

this end, consistent with the vegetative cover requirement for

bioretention systems, the minimum vegetative cover in an GI

MTD is 85% in order to qualify as GI under the Stormwater

Management rules at N.J.A.C. 7:8. The vegetative cover should

be determined based on the expected coverage of the

proposed plantings when matured. Plant death or damage shall

require replanting to maintain this 85% coverage requirement if

the system is installed as GI.

Page 142: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

MTD Design

31

Sample language in the Certification Letter setting the

design criteria:

Any MTD with bio-filtration media that would be placed "below

ground" as a vault without any vegetation can be considered

GI (for NJ purposes) only if the device infiltrates the entire Water

Quality Design Storm into the subsoil. Further, the below ground

device (vault) would need to meet the NJDEP Stormwater BMP

Manual conditions of having the soil below the MTD meet the

minimum tested infiltration rate of one inch per hour, have at

least two feet of separation from the seasonal high water table, and infiltrate into the subsoil.

Page 143: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

MTD Design

• MTDs are commonly sized using the rational method

• Q = ciA

• Many people mistakenly think the intensity of the Water Quality Design storm is the average of the 1.25 inches of rain in two hours

o 1.25 inches / 2 hours = 0.625 inches/hour– This is not correct!

32

Design Criteria

Page 144: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

33

Water Quality

Page 145: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

MTDs

34

Design Criteria

• Tc must be calculated in accordance with Chapter 15, in Part 630 of the NEH.

• For Tc = 10 minutes, i = 3.2 inches/hr

o Using 0.625 inches/hr underestimates flow by 80.5%

Page 146: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Water Quality

• BMPs should be designed to meet criteria in the BMP Manual

• Multiple BMPs can be used in series when necessary

• Infiltration BMPs require detailed soil permeability testing

• Detention BMPs must calculate the detention time to determine TSS removal rate

• Use intensity-Duration-Frequency curve in Figure 5-16 when using Rational Method to calculate peak flow rate

35

In summary…

Page 147: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

36

GROUNDWATER RECHARGE

Page 148: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• Demonstrate that 100% of the pre-development groundwater recharge is maintained or

• Infiltrate the difference in the 2-year storm runoff volume

37

Rule Requirements

Groundwater Recharge

Page 149: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• Pros:o Simple calculation

• Cons:o Requires larger infiltration structure,

o Greater risk of failure,

o Larger groundwater mound

38

Infiltrate 2-year storm difference:

Groundwater Recharge

Page 150: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• Use NRCS Method

• Show pre- and post-construction 2-year runoff volumes

• Follow all other assumptions of NRCS Method

o Curve numbers and time of concentration match quantity and quality analyses

39

The calculation of the 2-year storm difference should…

Groundwater Recharge

Page 151: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• Requires use of New Jersey Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

• Need to review:

o Pre-development vs. post-development land use inputs

o BMP designs

40

Maintain 100% of pre-development groundwater recharge:

Groundwater Recharge

Page 152: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

41

Groundwater Recharge

Page 153: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• Inputs (Orange cells):o Municipality

o Pre- and post-development land covers

o Pre- and post-development soils

o Acres

• Output:o Post-development annual recharge deficit

42

Page 1 (Annual Recharge Worksheet)

Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

Page 154: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• Soils and land covers must match site plans

• Soils determined by soil survey or Chapter 12 defaults

• Pre- and post-development areas should match

43

Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

Page 1 (Annual Recharge Worksheet)

Page 155: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

44

Groundwater Recharge

Page 156: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

45

Groundwater Recharge

Page 157: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• Parameter from Annual Recharge Worksheeto Vdef: Post-development deficit recharge

• Default from page 1 or other inputo Aimp: Post-D Impervious area (Targeted

Impervious area) contributing to recharge calculation• Default value is the total impervious surface from the first

page• Can be partial impervious surface runoff to recharge BMP

• Automatically populated outputo Annul BMP recharge volume

46

Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

Page 2 (BMP Calculation)

Page 158: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• segBMP = the post-developed site segment in which the proposed recharge BMP will be locatedo Used to specify where on the site the recharge BMP will be

located

o Can be set to zero if this is still undetermined or if BMPs will be placed over multiple segments

o Porous pavement, segment shall be the impervious area of the post-development

47

Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

Parameter from Annual Recharge Worksheet

Page 159: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• ABMP = BMP Area (the footprint of a BMP, excluding sloped areas)

• dBMP = BMP effective depth (maximum equivalent water depth that can be achieved in the BMP before overflow begins)

o If the BMP is filled with stone, the effective depth is the actual depth x the porosity

o For sloped BMP like bioretention swale, use averaged dBMP but adjust ABMP to keep that ABMP x dBMP should always equal the storage volume

48

Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

BMP Design Inputs

Page 160: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• dBMPu = Vertical distance from the vegetated ground surface to the maximum water level of the BMPo Positive if the maximum level is below the ground

surface and negative if above the ground surface

• dEXC = Vertical distance from the vegetated ground surface to the bottom of the BMP

49

Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

BMP Design Inputs

Page 161: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

50

Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

BMP Design

Page 162: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

51

Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

BMP Design

Page 163: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

52

Groundwater Recharge Spreadsheet

BMP Design

Page 164: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

53

Groundwater Recharge Example

Page 165: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

54

Groundwater Recharge Example

Page 166: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

55

Groundwater Recharge Example

Page 167: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

56

GL EL.=15 Berm EL.=16

Groundwater Recharge Example

Page 168: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• dBMPu = 15 (GL)– 13.36 (orifice)

= 1.64 ft (19.7 inches)

• dEXC = 15 – 12 = 3 ft (36 inches)

57

BMP Design

Groundwater Recharge Example

Page 169: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• The BMP effective depth: 1.36 ft (13.36 – 12 ft)

• Volume below first outlet: 59,400 ft3

58

BMP Design

Groundwater Recharge Example

Page 170: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• dBMP = 1.36 ft

• ABMP = ?o Remember: BMP area times effective depth must equal

volume

o 𝐴𝐵𝑀𝑃 =𝑉

𝑑𝐵𝑀𝑃=

59,400

1.36=43,676 ft2

59

BMP Design

Groundwater Recharge Example

Page 171: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• ABMP = 43,676 ft2 (the same)

• dBMP = 1.36 ft (the same)

• dBMPu = -1.36 feet (16.3 inches)

• dEXC = 0 inches

60

Groundwater Recharge

What if this BMP had been designed as a bioretention system?

Groundwater Recharge Example

Page 172: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Recharge

• Recharge of stormwater with high pollutant loading or industrial stormwater exposed to source material is prohibited

• All recharge BMPs must meet the infiltration criteria and structural design criteria in Chapters 9, 10, 11

• All BMPs designed to infiltrate must consider adverse hydraulic impact on the groundwater table

61

Rule Requirements

Groundwater Recharge

Page 173: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Water Quality

62

Summary

• Highlights of BMPso Small-Scale Bioretention System

o Extended detention basins

o Wet ponds

• Soil Testing – Appendix E/ Chapter 12

• Groundwater Recharge

Page 174: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

More Information:

63

Stormwater Management UnitBureau of Flood Hazard and Stormwater Engineering

Watershed Engineering ElementDivision of Watershed Protection and Restoration

401 East State Street

PO Box 420, Mail Code 401-2B

Trenton, NJ 08625-420

Tel: 609-633-7021

www.njstormwater.org

changi [email protected]

Page 175: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

MOUNDINGREQUIREMENTS, CALCULATIONS

and EXAMPLES

GROUNDWATER

Changi Wu/ Lisa Schaefer

NJDEP Division of Watershed Protection

and Restoration

SWMDR Training Module 3

October 12, 2021

Page 176: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Introduction

• Requirements Under N.J.A.C. 7:8

• Concepts

• Method of Calculation

• Examples

2

Goals

Page 177: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Mounding

• N.J.A.C. 7:8-5.4(a)2.iv, “The design engineer shall assess the hydraulic impact on the groundwater table and design the site so as to avoid adverse hydraulic impacts. “

• Localized increase in the height of the groundwater table as a result of infiltration

• Caused by concentrating large amount of recharge into one area

• Can cause basin failure or damage to nearby structures

Background

3

Page 178: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5102/support/sir2010-5102.pdf4

Groundwater Mounding

Page 179: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

5

METHOD of

CALCULATION

Page 180: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Groundwater Mounding

• Hantush equation developed in 1967 to calculate mounding beneath infiltration basin

• Easiest way to use the Hantush method is a spreadsheet developed by USGS

• Can only calculate the maximum height of mounding

Calculation

6

Page 181: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

7

https://www.njstormwater.org/bmp_manual/

Chapter 13

Download Hantush Excel Spreadsheet

The Hantush Spreadsheet

Page 182: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

The Hantush Spreadsheet

• Recharge rate (in/hr)

• Specific yield (dimensionless)

• Horizontal hydraulic conductivity (in/hr)

• Basin dimensions (feet)

• Duration of infiltration (hours)

• Initial thickness of saturated zone (ft)

Input Parameters

8

Page 183: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

The Hantush Spreadsheet

• Recharge rate (in/hr)

o Design soil permeability rate (vertical saturated soil hydraulic conductivity)

• Horizontal hydraulic conductivity

o Rarely a tested parameter

o In the coastal plain: 5 𝑥 recharge rate

o Outside the coastal plain: 1 𝑥 recharge rate

9

Input Parameters

Page 184: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

• Specific yield

o Specific yield governs how much water the unsaturated zone can store when recharged runoff reaches the water table

o The volume of water that will drain from the soil, as a result of gravity, divided by the total volume of the soil

o Default value 0.15 and up to a maximum value 0.2, with supporting soil test results

10

The Hantush Spreadsheet

Input Parameters

Page 185: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

• Basin dimensions (assumes rectangular and vertical sides)

o Input as ½ length in x-direction and ½ length in y-direction of the footprint of a BMP

• Circular shape BMP use the radius of the circular basin as both x and y.

• Irregular shape BMP, convert the shape to a rectangular shape that has same depth of stormwater runoff to be infiltrated and is best fitted to the original shape.

• If a BMP is designed with sloped sides, use the bottom footprint as the length and the width of the BMP and use the total volume of the runoff to be infiltrated divided by the area of the bottom footprint to calculate the duration of infiltration period 11

The Hantush Spreadsheet

Input Parameters

Page 186: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

• Initial thickness of saturated zone (ft)

o Unless proven by a field test showing the thickness of saturated zone beneath the proposed BMP, the default value is 10 ft.

o Note that the thickness of saturated zone used in the Hantush spreadsheet is not the thickness of a large regional aquifer. It is the distance from the Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT) to the first hydraulically restrictive layer.

12

The Hantush Spreadsheet

Input Parameters

Page 187: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

• Duration of infiltration (hours)

o Time for infiltrating the runoff volume through the BMP

o Using the recharge rate in the input

o Maximum value is 72 hr

13

The Hantush Spreadsheet

Input Parameters

Page 188: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

• Maximum mounding height decreases

o when following inputs increase:

• Horizontal hydraulic conductivity increases

• Specific yield increases

• Initial thickness of saturated zone increases

14

The Hantush Spreadsheet

How the Input Values Affect the Results

Page 189: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

• When the mounding height is higher than the bottom of the BMP, the recharge rate is impacted because of the reduced hydraulic gradient

o Use a smaller recharge and longer duration of infiltration

o The recharge rate times the duration of infiltration and the area of the footprint shall be equal to the volume infiltrated

15

The Hantush Spreadsheet

Interpreting the Results

𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑜𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑓 =

Duration of 𝑥 𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑥 𝑅𝑒𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒

infiltration period (hr) 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑠𝑓 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛/ℎ𝑟

Page 190: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

• When result shows that mounding height reaches the bottom of the infiltration BMP o decrease recharge rate & longer infiltration period, or

o design a larger but shallower basin

16

The Hantush Spreadsheet

Interpreting the Results

Page 191: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

17

GROUNDWATER

MOUNDING

EXAMPLES

Page 192: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Introduction

• Demonstrate simple analysis

• Demonstrate calculating impacts to nearby structures

18

Goals

Page 193: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Examples

1. No adverse hydraulic impact to groundwater

2. Adverse hydraulic impact to groundwater and adjustments required

19

Scenarios:

Page 194: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

No Adverse Hydraulic Impact to Groundwater Scenario

• A major development located in the coastal plain proposes an

infiltration basin, whose bottom footprint measures 50 ft by 50 ft, to

infiltrate 5,000 cf of runoff generated by the Water Quality Design

Storm (WQDS).

o The maximum depth of ponding water is designed to be 2 ft

o Soil testing was performed in accordance with Chapter 12

o The soil testing report shows that the Seasonal High Water Table

(SHWT) is 7.5 ft below the 6 inch thick bottom sand layer of the

basin

o The tested soil permeability rate of the most restrictive soil horizon

below the basin is 4 in/hr

o No nearby underground structures are present

20

Page 195: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

No Adverse Hydraulic Impact to Groundwater Scenario

Step #1: Calculate the duration of infiltration period

Duration of infiltration period, t (hours)

= 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑜𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑓 𝑥 12 𝑖𝑛/𝑓𝑡

𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑠𝑓 𝑥 𝑅𝑒𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛/ℎ𝑟

Infiltration area

= 50 ft 𝑥 50 ft = 2,500 sf

Recharge Rate = ½ Tested Infiltration rate

= 0.5 𝑥 4 in/hr = 2 in/hr

Therefore, t

= 5,000 𝑐𝑓 𝑥 12 𝑖𝑛/𝑓𝑡

2,500 𝑠𝑓 𝑥 2 𝑖𝑛/ℎ𝑟= 12 hr

21

Page 196: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

No Adverse Hydraulic Impact to Groundwater Scenario

Step #2: Prepare the inputs for the spreadsheet

22

Parameter Value

Recharge rate (R) 2 in/hr (4 ft/day)

Specific yield (Sy) 0.15

Horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kh) 10 in/hr (20 ft/day)

½ length of basin (x direction) 25 ft

½ length of basin (y direction) 25 ft

Duration of infiltration period (t) 12 hr (0.5 days)

Initial thickness of saturated zone (hi(0)) 10 ft

Page 197: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

No Adverse Hydraulic Impact to Groundwater Scenario

Step #2: Input Section of the Hantush Spreadsheet

23

Page 198: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

No Adverse Hydraulic Impact to Groundwater Scenario

Step #2: Results Section of the Hantush Spreadsheet

24

SHWT

Page 199: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

How the Hantush Spreadsheet Represents an Adverse Hydraulic Impact

Results Section of the Hantush Spreadsheet

25

SHWT

Page 200: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Drywell Scenario

26

• A site is located outside the coastal plain. A 7 ft high by 5 ft diameter drywell is proposed to store and infiltrate 137.4 cf of roof runoff from a single-family home for the Water Quality Design Storm.

o The house has a basement floor located just above the groundwater table.

o The edge of the drywell is 10 ft away from the house. o Soil testing was performed in accordance with Chapter 12o The soil testing report shows that SHWT is 2 ft below the bottom of

the drywello The tested soil permeability rate of the most restrictive soil horizon

below the basin is 4 in/hro The duration of infiltration period, t =

= 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑜𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑓 𝑥 12 𝑖𝑛/𝑓𝑡

𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑠𝑓 𝑥 𝑅𝑒𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛/ℎ𝑟

= 137.4 𝑐𝑓 𝑥 12 𝑖𝑛/𝑓𝑡

19.62 𝑠𝑓 𝑥 2 𝑖𝑛/ℎ𝑟= 42 hr

Page 201: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Drywell Scenario

Step #1: Prepare the inputs for the spreadsheet

27

Parameter Value

Recharge rate (R) 2 in/hr (4 ft/day)

Specific yield (Sy) 0.15

Horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kh) 2 in/hr (4 ft/day)

½ length of basin (x direction) 2.5 ft

½ length of basin (y direction) 2.5 ft

Duration of infiltration period (t) 42 hr

Initial thickness of saturated zone (hi(0)) 10 ft

Page 202: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Drywell scenario

28

Step #2: Results Section of the Hantush Spreadsheet

SWHT

Centerline of the drywell

Page 203: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Drywell Scenario

29

Step #2: Results Section of the Hantush Spreadsheet

Page 204: Module 3 of 4 Stormwater Management Design Review

Any Questions?

30

Stormwater Management UnitBureau of Flood Hazard and Stormwater Engineering

Watershed Engineering ElementDivision of Watershed Protection and Restoration

401 East State Street

PO Box 420, Mail Code 401-2B

Trenton, NJ 08625-420

Tel: 609-633-7021

www.njstormwater.org

Changi [email protected]

Lisa [email protected]