module 27 continuing authorities program module 27 continuing authorities program civil works...
TRANSCRIPT
Module 27Module 27
ContinuingContinuingAuthoritiesAuthorities
ProgramProgram
Module 27Module 27
ContinuingContinuingAuthoritiesAuthorities
ProgramProgram
Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11
Objectives:Objectives:Objectives:Objectives:
“Provide a basic overview and understanding of the Continuing Authorities Program (CAP) and the differences between the GI and CAP processes”
Continuing Authorities ProgramContinuing Authorities Program
Congress Has Provided the Corps with Standing Authorities to Study and Build Specific Water
Resource Projects for Specific Purposes and with Specified Federal Spending Limits.
CAP AuthoritiesCAP Authorities
S ectio n 14E m erg en cyS tream b ankP ro tec tion
S ection 103S h o re lineP ro tec tion
S ection 107N aviga tion
S ection 111S h o re lineM itiga tion
S ection 204B en efic ia l U ses
ofD red g ed M aterial
S ec tion 205F lo od
C o n trol
S ec tion 206Aq u atic/E s tu ary
R estora tion
S ectio n 3N aviga tionC learin g &S n agg ing
S ection 208C learin g &S n agg ing
S ectio n 1135R estora tion
Assoc ia ted W itha C o rp s P ro ject
ContinuingAuthorities
Program
CAP ProjectsCAP Projects
Quicker to Implement ! (usually 3 years from study to construction, SAF)
Limited in scope, geographic area and complexity
Have a Federal cost limit determined by the specific project authority
Feasibility Report or Definite Project Report (DPR) approved by Division Commander
Typically FCSA approved/executed by District Commander & PPA approved at Division
Do not need additional Congressional authorization for individual projects
What CAP is NotWhat CAP is Not
CAP is not for…
Study only activities
Avoiding specific Congressional authorization requirements (by “daisy chaining” together CAP projects)
Correction of design deficiencies on another project
CAP Program StructureCAP Program Structure
Two Phase Program– Feasibility Phase– Design & Implementation Phase (D&I)
Prior to January 31, 2006 – – Recon, Feasibility, and Construction
Phases
CAP Feasibility PhaseCAP Feasibility Phase
Sponsor submits request for assistance– Environmental (206/1135) may be “non-profit entity”– Request to include financial understanding
Initially Federally funded up to $100,000
No FCSA required if Feasibility < $100k*Costs beyond $100k shared 50/50 with FCSA
*Should a project (somehow) complete Feasibility under $100k, any remaining feasibility funds may not be used toward the D&I phase
Typical CAP MilestonesTypical CAP Milestones
Federal Interest Determination (FID)– Acknowledge/Decline Federal Interest– Solution(s) which result in a project consistent with the intent of
CAP and willing & capable sponsor
Project Management Plan (PMP)
Alternative Formulation Briefing (AFB) – Held after alternative plans formulated and prior to release of draft
decision document for public review– Legal & policy issues identified w/ MSC concurrence
Final product is the Detailed Report (DPR)
Design & Implementation (D&I) PhaseDesign & Implementation (D&I) Phase
Begins upon MSC approval of decision document
If EIS is completed, a Record of Decision (ROD) is to be signed by the Division Commander (ER 200-2-2)
Requires PPA for D&I phase
Design-Completion of Plans and Specs
Implementation
Solicitation for Contracts
D&I – Project CompletionD&I – Project Completion
District Commander determines if project is functional and turns it over to the sponsor for O&M
OMRR&R manual provided to sponsor with turn over letter
Project completion of final accounting report
Typical CAP Study DocumentationTypical CAP Study Documentation
A clear description of the recommended plan
Demonstration of project justification based on standard Corps project justification criteria for the particular purpose
Documentation of compliance with appropriate Federal, state, and local environmental and regulatory requirements
The non-federal sponsor signs a self-certification of financial capability for project implementation
District Real Estate certification that the non-federal sponsor has the capability to acquire and provide the required real estate interests
Identification of the anticipated O&MRR&R, including estimated costs
ATR documentation
District counsel legal sufficiency statement for the decision document and NEPA
A completed Real Estate Plan
CAP Study Cannot Be Approved WhenCAP Study Cannot Be Approved When::
CAP authority is not appropriate for that purpose
Study costs exceed construction costs
Estimated Federal cost exceeds CAP authorization’s per-project funding limit
A non-federal sponsor for design/implementation is not identified
There are outstanding policy issues
Any required environmental compliance is not completed
Converting CAP to GI Converting CAP to GI and Vice Versaand Vice Versa
CAP studies may be converted to a specifically authorized GI program study if the proposed solution will exceed the specific CAP funding limit
GI Feasibility studies or a (separable element) may be converted to CAP if it appears they will result in a small, non-complex project
Cannot use CAP funds for GI studies except to finish a “logical increment”
CAP FACTSCAP FACTS
Congressional Committees and HQUSACE have mandated that CAP be a national program. As such budget allocations and project new starts are approved by HQUSACE
Congress has been earmarking projects in each of the authorities, so much so that no other projects can be considered until this backlog has been completed
Demand exceeds funds available
CAP PROCEDURESCAP PROCEDURESCAP PROCEDURESCAP PROCEDURES
ER 1105-2-100, Appendix F Provides Detailed Program Guidance for all CAP authorities:
Program/Project Funding and Allocation HQ/MSC Responsibility Cost-Sharing, FCSA & PPA’s MSC’s responsible for establishing decision
document requirements and formats
CLEARING & SNAGGINGCLEARING & SNAGGINGCLEARING & SNAGGINGCLEARING & SNAGGING
Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended
Purpose - Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control
Per Project Federal Spending Limit of $500,000
Annual Program Spending Limit of $7,500,000
Aquatic Ecosystem and Aquatic Ecosystem and Estuary RestorationEstuary Restoration
Aquatic Ecosystem and Aquatic Ecosystem and Estuary RestorationEstuary Restoration
Section 206, Water Resources
Development Act (WRDA) of 1996, as amended by WRDA 2007
Purpose - aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection
Per Project Federal Spending Limit of $5,000,000
Annual Program Appropriation Limit of $50,000,000
FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENTFLOOD RISK MANAGEMENTFLOOD RISK MANAGEMENTFLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as Amended
Purpose - Flood Damage Reduction
Per Project Federal Spending Limit of $7,000,000
Annual Program Spending Limit of $55,000,000
SHORELINE PROTECTIONSHORELINE PROTECTIONSHORELINE PROTECTIONSHORELINE PROTECTION
Section 103, River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended
Purpose - Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction
Per Project Federal Spending Limit of $3,000,000
Annual Program Spending Limit of $30,000,000
Emergency StreambankEmergency StreambankEmergency StreambankEmergency StreambankSection 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended
Purpose of Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Erosion Protection for Public Facilities and Services
Per Project Federal Spending Limit of $1,500,000 Annual Program Spending Limit of $15,000,000
Cost Sharing for Sections 208, 206Cost Sharing for Sections 208, 206**, , 205, 103, 14,205, 103, 14,
Cost Sharing for Sections 208, 206Cost Sharing for Sections 208, 206**, , 205, 103, 14,205, 103, 14,
• No reconnaissance phase
• Feasibility study initially Federally funded up to $100,000 to prepare Federal interest determination and follow on decision document
• Costs in excess of the $100,000 must be cost shared 50%-50% (FCSA)
• D&I are cost-shared 65% Federal (up to the per project limit) 35% Non-Federal
• Non - Federal share may be credit for work in-kind
• A PPA is executed after project approval and prior to initiation of D&I phase
*Section 206 Sponsors can be a Non-Governmental Organization
NAVIGATIONNAVIGATIONNAVIGATIONNAVIGATION
Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended
Purpose - Navigation Per Project Federal Spending
Limit of $7,000,000 Annual Program Spending
Limit of $35,000,000
Cost Sharing For Section 107Cost Sharing For Section 107Cost Sharing For Section 107Cost Sharing For Section 107
• No reconnaissance phase
• Initially Federally funded up to $100,000 to prepare Federal interest determination and follow on decision document
• Costs in excess of the $100,000 must be cost shared 50%-50% (FCSA)
• Non - Federal share may be credit for work in-kind
• Cost sharing of D&I is the same as specifically authorized navigation projects
• A PPA is executed after project approval and prior to initiation of D&I Phase
• Currently execution of all Section 107 agreements must be approved by ASA (CW)
NAVIGATIONNAVIGATIONNAVIGATIONNAVIGATION
Section 3, River and Harbor Act of 1945, as amended
Purpose - Clearing & Snagging No Per Project Fed Funding
Limit Annual Program Spending
Limit of $1,000,000 Not funded in recent years
Cost Sharing For Section 3Cost Sharing For Section 3
• 100% Federal cost for design and construction
• Non-Federal responsible for LERRDs
• Non-Federal responsible for O&M
SHORELINE MITIGATIONSHORELINE MITIGATIONSHORELINE MITIGATIONSHORELINE MITIGATION
Section 111, River and Harbor Act of 1968, as amended
Purpose - Mitigation of Shoreline Erosion Damage Caused by Federal Navigation Projects
Per Project Federal Spending Limit of $5,000,000. If the Federal Share Exceeds $5,000,000, the Project May NOT Proceed Without Specific Congressional Authorization
Cost Sharing for Section 111Cost Sharing for Section 111Cost Sharing for Section 111Cost Sharing for Section 111
• Non - Federal share may be credit for work in-kind
• D&I and construction phases are cost-shared the same as the navigation feature causing the damage.
• A PPA is executed after project approval and prior to initiation of D&I Phase
• No reconnaissance phase
• Initially Federally funded up to $100,000 to prepare Federal Interest determination and follow on decision document
• Costs in excess of the $100,000 must be cost shared 50%-50% (FCSA)
Project Modifications forProject Modifications forImprovement of the EnvironmentImprovement of the Environment
Project Modifications forProject Modifications forImprovement of the EnvironmentImprovement of the Environment
Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, as amended
Purpose - Modification to improve the environment where an existing Federal project contributed to the problem
Per Project Federal Spending Limit of $5,000,000 Program Annual Appropriation Limit
of $40,000,000
Cost Sharing For Section 1135Cost Sharing For Section 1135Cost Sharing For Section 1135Cost Sharing For Section 1135
• D&I are cost-shared 75% Federal (up to the per project limit) 25% Non-Federal
• Non - Federal share may be credit for work in-kind
• A PPA is executed after project approval prior to initiation of D&I
• Sponsors can be Non-Governmental Organization
• No reconnaissance phase
• Initially Federally funded up to $100,000 to prepare Federal interest determination and follow on decision document
• Costs in excess of the $100,000 must be cost shared 50%-50% (FCSA)
Ecosystem Restoration in Ecosystem Restoration in Connection with Dredging Connection with Dredging Ecosystem Restoration in Ecosystem Restoration in Connection with Dredging Connection with Dredging
Section 204, Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1992, as amended
Purpose - protection, restoration, and creation of aquatic and ecologically related habitats, including wetlands, in connection with dredging for construction, O&M of an authorized Federal project
Per Project Federal Spending Limit of $5,000,000 Annual Program Appropriation Limit of $30,000,000
Cost Sharing For Section 204Cost Sharing For Section 204Cost Sharing For Section 204Cost Sharing For Section 204
No reconnaissance phase
Initially Federally funded up to $100,000 to prepare Federal interest determination and follow on decision document
Costs in excess of the $100,000 must be cost shared 50%-50% (FCSA)
D&I are cost shared 65/35
• A PPA is executed at the end of P&S
• Cost sharing is for the increment above the base disposal plan which are “costs necessary to carry out dredging…in the most effective way, consistent with economic, engineering, and environmental criteria.”
Program Funding LimitsProgram Funding Limits
Section Description Project Program ($ million) ($ million)
3 Navigation Clearing & Snagging None 1
14 Streambank/Shore protection 1.5 15
103 Beach Erosion Control 3 30
107 Navigation 7 35
111 Mitigation of Shore Damage 5 None
205 Flood Damage Reduction 7 55
208 Snagging/Clearing 0.5 7.5
206 Aquatic Restoration 5 50
1135 Ecosystem Restoration 5 40
204 Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 5 30
Section Description Project Program ($ million) ($ million)
3 Navigation Clearing & Snagging None 1
14 Streambank/Shore protection 1.5 15
103 Beach Erosion Control 3 30
107 Navigation 7 35
111 Mitigation of Shore Damage 5 None
205 Flood Damage Reduction 7 55
208 Snagging/Clearing 0.5 7.5
206 Aquatic Restoration 5 50
1135 Ecosystem Restoration 5 40
204 Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 5 30
Fiscal Year 2007 - Funding LevelsFiscal Year 2007 - Funding Levels
Section Authority 07 Budget 07
Approp. ($ million) ($ million)
1414 Streambank/Shore protection 1.3 Streambank/Shore protection 1.3 15 15
103103 Beach Erosion Control 0.6Beach Erosion Control 0.6 7 7
107107 NavigationNavigation 0.8 0.8 12 12
111111 Mitigation of Shore Damage 0 0.5Mitigation of Shore Damage 0 0.5
205205 Flood Damage Reduction 16 Flood Damage Reduction 16 40 40
208208 Snagging/ClearingSnagging/Clearing 0 0 0.3 0.3
206206 Aquatic RestorationAquatic Restoration 15 15 30 30
11351135 Ecosystem Restoration 15Ecosystem Restoration 15 30 30
204204 Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 0Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 0 5 5
Fiscal Year 2008 - Funding LevelsFiscal Year 2008 - Funding Levels
Section Authority 08 Budget 08
Approp. ($ million) ($ million)
1414 Streambank/Shore protection 0.9 Streambank/Shore protection 0.9 9.8 9.8
103103 Beach Erosion Control 0.4Beach Erosion Control 0.4 4.4 4.4
107107 NavigationNavigation 0.5 0.5 7.4 7.4
111111 Mitigation of Shore Damage 0 4.8Mitigation of Shore Damage 0 4.8
205205 Flood Damage Reduction 11.7 Flood Damage Reduction 11.7 42.3 42.3
208208 Snagging/ClearingSnagging/Clearing 0.1 0.1 0 0
206206 Aquatic RestorationAquatic Restoration 11.3 11.3 29.5 29.5
11351135 Ecosystem Restoration 11.2Ecosystem Restoration 11.2 29.5 29.5
204204 Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 0Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 0 5.3 5.3
Fiscal Year 2009 - Funding LevelsFiscal Year 2009 - Funding Levels
Section Authority 09 Budget 09
Approp. ($ million) ($ million)
1414 Streambank/Shore protection 2.3 Streambank/Shore protection 2.3 8.6 8.6103103 Beach Erosion Control 0Beach Erosion Control 0 4.3 4.3107107 NavigationNavigation 0.6 0.6 7.2 7.2111111 Mitigation of Shore Damage 0 4.3Mitigation of Shore Damage 0 4.3205205 Flood Damage Reduction 2.6 Flood Damage Reduction 2.6 38.3 38.3208208 Snagging/ClearingSnagging/Clearing 0 0 0.5 0.5206206 Aquatic RestorationAquatic Restoration 10.3 10.3 28.7 28.7
11351135 Ecosystem Restoration 6.5Ecosystem Restoration 6.5 28.7 28.7204204 Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 0Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 0 3.8 3.8
Fiscal Year 2010 - Funding LevelsFiscal Year 2010 - Funding Levels
Section Authority 10 Budget 10
Approp. ($ million) ($ million)
1414 Streambank/Shore protection 1.5 Streambank/Shore protection 1.5 5.8 5.8103103 Beach Erosion Control 0.7Beach Erosion Control 0.7 3.9 3.9107107 NavigationNavigation 1.4 1.4 6.3 6.3111111 Mitigation of Shore Damage 0 6.3Mitigation of Shore Damage 0 6.3205205 Flood Damage Reduction 12.0 Flood Damage Reduction 12.0 37.8 37.8208208 Snagging/ClearingSnagging/Clearing 0.2 0.2 0 0206206 Aquatic RestorationAquatic Restoration 7.0 7.0 27.1 27.1
11351135 Ecosystem Restoration 5.7Ecosystem Restoration 5.7 24.2 24.2204204 Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 0Beneficial Uses - Dred. Mat. 0 7.8 7.8