models of teaching methods
DESCRIPTION
this is about the models of teaching methods which includes- think inductively by hilda taba,concept attainment, contructivism , cybernetics,advanced organizer,role play. it will surely benefit you..TRANSCRIPT
MODELS OF TEACHING METHODS
COMPILED BY Tushti Sharma
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page no.
INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………. 2
OVERVIEW OF THE TEACHING MODELS …………………………… 3
DESCRIBING THE MODELS ……………………………………………... 5
THE INDUCTIVE THINKING MODEL…………………………………… 8
THE CONCEPT ATTAINMENT MODEL ……………………………….. 15
ADVANCE ORGANIZERS MODEL ………………………………………… 20
ROLE PLAYING MODEL ………………………………………………….. 26
CYBERNETIC’S MODEL …………………………………………………… 33
CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORY …………………………………………….` 38
BIBLIOGRAPHY . …………………………………………….……………… 45
1
INTRODUCTION
Approaches are learning theories which will be applied when delivering subject
matter. Methods are a set of teachers’ systemic action to reach learning objectives
in a limited time frame; it includes procedures based on approaches. Techniques
are the manipulation of the method to optimize learning, for example, exercises in
class pertaining to a subject matter. A teacher, therefore, is free to construct a
teaching method based on an approach. The relationship between approaches,
methods and techniques delivers model. Models will explicate teaching methods
and strategies, which are in turn based on teaching approaches (Kamaruddin,
1993).
Teaching models prescribe tested steps and procedures to effectively generate
desired outcomes. The number of emerging models and the ones that have
emerged is uncountable. Each emerging new model either explores a new
approach or attempts a modification of the conventional ones as to cater the
uniqueness of individuals. Most importantly, any teaching model should optimize
learning experiences to the needs of each learner by carefully exploring the
learning problems and offering tailored assistance.
2
OVERVIEW OF THE TEACHING MODELS
(1) INDUCTIVE THINKING
The ability to create concepts is generally regarded as one of the basic thinking
skills. The model presented here is from the work of Hilda Taba names for
concepts; and to explore ways of becoming more skillful at discovering and
organizing information and at creating and testing hypotheses describing
relationships among sets of data. The model has been used in a wide variety of
curriculum areas and with students of all ages.
(2) CONCEPT ATTAINMENT
This model, built around the studies of thinking conducted by Bruner, Goodnow,
and Austin (1967). It is designed to help students learn concepts for organizing
information and to help them become more effective at learning concepts. It
includes an efficient method for presenting organized information from a wide
range of areas of study to students of every stage of development.
(3) ADVANCE ORGANIZERS
During the last twenty years this model, formulated by David Ausubel (1963), has
become one of the most researched in the information-processing family. It is
designed to provide students with a cognitive structure for comprehending
material presented through lectures, readings, and other media. It has been
employed with almost every conceivable content and with students of every age. It
can be easily combined with other models-for example, when presentations are
mixed with inductive activity.
3
(4) ROLE PLAYING
Designed by Fannie and George Shaftel (1984) specifically to help students study
their social values and reflect on them, role playing also helps students collect and
organize information about social issues, develop empathy with others, and
attempt to improve their social skills. The model asks students to "act out"
conflicts, to learn to take the roles of others, and to observe social behavior. With
appropriate adaptation, role playing can be used with students of all ages.
(5) CYBERNETICS
Two approaches to training have been developed from the cybernetic group of
behavior theorists. One is a theory-to-practice model and the other is
simulation. The former mixes information about a skill with demonstrations,
practice, feedback, and coaching until the skill is mastered. For example, if an
arithmetic skill is the objective, it is explained and demonstrated, practice is given
with corrective feedback, and the student is asked to apply it with coaching from
peers or the instructor. Simulations are constructed from descriptions of real-life
situations. A less-than-real-life environment is created for the instructional station.
Sometimes the renditions are quite elaborate (for example, flight and space flight
simulators). The student engages in activity to achieve the goal of the simulation
(to get the aircraft off the ground, or to redevelop an urban area), and has to deal
with realistic factors until the goal is mastered.
(6) CONSTRUCTIVIST MODEL
Bruner's constructivist theory is based upon the study of cognition. A major theme
in this theory is that "learning is an active process in which learners construct new
ideas or concepts based upon their current/past knowledge" (Kearsely 1994b).
Cognitive structures are used to provide meaning and organization to experiences
and allows the individual to go beyond the information given.
4
DESCRIBING THE MODELS
Each model has of four concepts: syntax, social system, principles of reaction, and
support system. These descriptions are the operational heart of each model: They
tell us what activities should occur and, when appropriate, in what sequence. The
four concepts used to describe the operations of the model itself (syntax, social
system, principles of reaction, and support system) as a way of communicating the
basic procedures involved in implementing any instructional model.
SYNTAX
The syntax or phasing of the model describes the model in action-for example,
as we use it. How do we begin? What would happen next? We describe syntax in
terms of sequences of activities we call phases; each model has a distinct flow of
phases. For example, one model begins with a presentation to the learner of a
concept called an advance organizer, which the leader presents to the student
verbally, in either written oral form. In the second phase, data are presented to the
learner. He or she reads them, watches a film, or is exposed to the data in some
other way. This phase is followed by another in which the learner is helped to
relate the material to the organizing concept.
In a different model, the first phase of a typical activity includes data collection by
the student. The second phase involves organization of the data under concepts
the student forms himself or herself, and the third, a comparison of the concepts
developed with those developed by other people. As shown in Table 1, these two
models have very different structures or sets of phases, even though the same
type of concept might emerge from both models, and they were in fact designed
for somewhat different purposes. The first was designed to encourage mastery of
material, and the second, to teach students inductive thinking processes.
Comparing the phasing of the two models in Table 1 reveals the practical
differences between them. An inductive strategy has different activities and a
different sequence than a deductive one.
5
THE SOCIAL SYSTEM
The social system describes student and teacher roles and relationships and the
kind of norms that are encouraged. The leadership roles of the teacher vary
greatly from model to model. In some models the teacher is a reflector or a
facilitator of group activity, in others a counselor of individuals, and in others a
taskmaster. In some models the teacher is the center of activity, the source of
information, and the organizer and pacer of the situation (high structure). Some
models distribute activity equally between teacher and student (moderate
structure), whereas others place the student at the center, encouraging a great
deal of social and intellectual independence (low structure). One way to describe a
model of teaching, then, is in terms of the degree of structure in the learning
environment. As roles, relationships, norms, and activities become less externally
imposed and more within the students' control, the social system becomes less
structured. As we see, some models are inherently more structured than others.
However, the structure of all models can be varied greatly to adapt to the skill
personality of the students.
PRINCIPLES OF REACTION
Principles of reaction tell the teacher how to regard the learner and how
to respond to what the learner does. In some models the teacher overtly tries to
shape behavior by rewarding certain student activities and maintaining a neutral
stance toward others. In other models, such as those designed to develop
Table 1 Phasing In Two Models PHASE ONE PHASE TWO PHASE THREE MODEL 1 Presentation of concept Presentation of data Relating data to MODEL 2 Presentation of data Development of Identification and categories by naming of concepts students
6
creativity, the teacher tries to maintain a non-evaluative, equal stance so that the
learner becomes self-directing. Principles of reaction provide the teacher with rules
of thumb by which to tune in to the student and select model-appropriate
responses to what the student does.
SUPPORT SYSTEM
This concept is to describe not the model itself so much as the supporting
conditions necessary for its existence. What are the additional requirements of the
model beyond the usual human skills and capacities and technical facilities? For
example, the laboratory model may require a trained leader; the Nondirective
Model may require an exceedingly patient, supportive personality. Suppose a
model postulates that students should teach themselves, and that the roles of
teachers should be limited to consultation and facilitation. What support is
necessary? Certainly a classroom filled only with textbooks would be limiting and
prescriptive. Rather, support in the form of books, films, self-instructional systems,
and travel arrangements are necessary, or the model will be empty. A few
examples of the use of the model are given-usually in classroom settings. The
examples are not exhaustive, but are selected to make real some of the
possibilities.
7
THE INDUCTIVE THINKING MODEL
Inductive reasoning is a branch of logic. In a valid inductive argument, the
conclusion is believed to be true on the basis of modifying, rejecting and accepting
hypotheses. One of the influential constructivist’s curriculum developers, Hilda
Taba, believes that students make generalizations only after data are organized
and exemplified (Hannah, n.d.). She believes that students can be led toward
making generalizations through concept development and concept attainment
strategies, and describes generalizing hypothesis actively as a higher order of
thinking. Hilda Taba (in Hannah, n.d.) further utilizes three main assumptions in
developing her teaching model.
1.Thinking can be taught.
2.Thinking is an active transaction between the individual and data.
3.Processes of thought evolve by a sequence that is “lawful.”
In short, the inductive teaching strategies are powerful tools that can be utilized
and manipulated by teachers in their classes. Since these models cover contents
that range from concept, relationship between concepts to organized bodies of
knowledge, these teaching strategies can be used in pure sciences, social sciences
and even art classes. It focuses on developing students’ self-constructive of the
understanding, critical thinking and active participation in class as well as
teacher’s role as an active guidance.
The focal point of this model is the emphasis on learners’ active involvement in the
classroom activities and learners’ development of critical thinking. One of the
strategies to develop such environment is the utilization of real examples that
represent the content of the lesson plan. Students, then, have to hypothesize on
the theory based on the presented examples. The effectiveness of this model
depends on the active role of the teacher in assisting students to process and
8
hypothesize the information from the examples and the active role of learners to
develop their critical thinking.
1. CONTENT TYPE
The focus of the Inductive Model is to assist students to build deep understanding
of specific topics or ideas. These specific topics as promoted by the model can be
categorized as follows:
Adopted from Eggen & Kauchak (1996).
1.2 Concepts
Concepts are classes or categories of ideas with common characteristics. Concepts
can be found in various areas of studies, such as language, social sciences, science
and mathematics. As such, the Inductive Model can be utilized in art classes as
well as science classes, as long as the content of the lesson focuses on concepts.
An essential characteristic of concepts is its defining features. Concepts are also
best described through its characteristics, related concepts, examples and
definition. Therefore, the teacher should ensure that the examples provided
contain essential characteristics of the concept; and the success of the lesson
depends on how students are able to identify the characteristics in the examples
(Eggen & Kauchak, 1996; Newby, 2003). Examples of concepts are adjective,
direct object and protagonist in language arts, and democracy and social norm in
social sciences.
9
Concepts Relationships among Concepts
Principles Generalizations
Content Types
Academic Rule
1.3 Relationships among Concepts
To understand or form ideas about concepts, we can also generalize its common
characteristics. This is because concepts possess common patterns among its
characteristics, which we tend to generalize. The broad patterns can be
categorized as principles, generalizations, and academic rules (Eggen & Kauchak,
1996).
a) Principles
A principle of a concept is any relationship among concepts that can be
accepted as true or valid for all known cases. Principles are mostly found in the
sciences. Examples of principles are:
• Change is inevitable.
• Like magnetic poles repel and unlike poles attract.
• The greater the unbalanced force on an object, the greater its
acceleration.
b) Generalizations
Generalizations of a concept are relationships between concepts that
describe patterns that have exceptions. Examples of generalizations are:
• People immigrate for economic reasons.
• A diet high in saturated fat raises a person’s cholesterol level.
• Teachers increase achievement by calling on all students equally.
c) Academic Rules
Academic rules are relationships between concepts arbitrarily derived by
people. Examples of academic rules are:
• A pronoun must agree with its antecedent in number and gender.
• In English, an adjective precedes the noun it modifies.
10
• In rounding off a number, if the last digit is 5 or more, you round up,
and if it is 4 or less, you round down.
2.TABA’S THREE TEACHING STRATEGIES
Taba identifies three inductive thinking tasks and then develops three teaching
strategies to induce those tasks. Each task represents a stage in the inductive
thinking process as Taba describes it.
The first is concept formation (the basic teaching strategy),
the second is interpretation of data, and
the third is the application of principles.
Concept formation
This stage involves
(1) identifying and enumerating the data that are relevant to a problem;
(2) grouping those items according to some basis of similarity; and
(3) developing categories and labels for the groups.
To engage students in each of these activities, Taba invented teaching moves in
the form of questions. These eliciting questions are matched to particular types of
activities. For example, the question, "What did you see?" might induce the
student to enumerate a list. The question, "What belongs together?" is likely to
cause people to group those things that have been listed. The question, "What
would we call these groups?" would be likely to induce people to develop labels or
categories
Interpretation of data
Taba's second teaching strategy (inter- pretation of data) is built around the
mental operations she refers to as inter-preting, inferring, and generalizing
11
Application of principles
The third cognitive task around which Taba builds a teaching strategy is that of
applying principles to explain new phenomena. This strategy follows the first two; a
unit or course would lead the students from concept-formation activities to
activities requiring interpretation of data, and then to activities requiring
application of principles. At each stage, students would be required to expand their
capacities to handle information, first developing new concepts, then developing
new ways of applying established principles in new situations.
The first phase of the strategy requires students to predict consequences, explain
unfamiliar data, or hypothesize. We might continue our previous example by
asking students, "How would it change the picture if the value of currency were
based on iron ore?" Or the teacher might change the emphasis by asking students
for various hypotheses about things that might stabilize the international monetary
situation as exemplified by the currencies of the three countries.
In the second phase, students attempt to explain or support the predictions or
hypotheses. For example, if someone feels that a fixed currency rate for all
countries should be established and held for a long time, he or she would attempt
to explain why he or she thought this system would work, and how he or she
thought it would fare with such factors as the relative prosperities or production
ratios within the countries.
In the third phase, students verify these predictions or identify conditions that
would verify the predictions.
3. THE MODEL OF TEACHING
SYNTAX
These three teaching strategies strongly resemble each other. Each is built around
a mental operation: concept formation, interpretation of data, application
of principles or ideas. Thus, the sequence of activities forms the syntax of the
12
teaching strategies and is presumably accompanied by underlying mental
processes. In each case, the teacher moves the strategy along by means of
eliciting questions to guide the student from one phase of activity into the next, at
the appropriate time. In the case of concept formation strategy, for example, the
grouping of data would be premature if the data had not been identified and
enumerated. But to delay too long before moving to the next phase would be to
lose opportunities and interest.
SOCIAL SYSTEM
In all three strategies, the atmosphere of the classroom is cooperative, with a good
deal of pupil activity. Since the teacher is generally the initiator of phases, and the
sequence of the activities is determined in advance, he or she begins in a
controlling, though cooperative, position. However, as the students learn the
strategies, they assume greater control.
PRINCIPLES OF REACTION
Taba provides the teacher with rather clear guidelines for reacting and responding
within each phase. In matching the eliciting questions or moves to the specific
cognitive tasks within each strategy, the teacher must be sure that the cognitive
tasks occur in optimum order, and also at the right time. As mentioned earlier, the
teacher should not direct a grouping question to a person who has not yet
enumerated or listed, and if the teacher is working with a large group, he or she
must be sure that the enumeration and listing activity is completed and
understood by all before proceeding to the grouping questions. The most
prominent moves by the teachers are questions, and the eliciting questions are
modeled after the cognitive functions. The teacher's primary mental task in the
course of the strategies is to monitor how students are processing information, and
then to use appropriate eliciting questions. The important task for the teacher is to
sense the students' readiness for new experience and new cognitive activity with
which to assimilate and use those experiences.
SUPPORT SYSTEM
These strategies can be used in any curricular area that has large amounts of raw
13
data that need to be organized. For example, in studying the economic aspects of
various nations, students would need large quantities of data about the economics
of those countries and statistics about world affairs. Then the teacher's iob would
be to help them process the data in increasingly complex ways, and at the same
time to increase the general capacities of their systems for processing data.
Summary Chart Table: Inductlve Thlnking Model
SYNTAX
Strategy Three: Application of Principles
Phase Seven: Predicting consequences, explaining unfamiliar phenomena, hypothesizing
Phase Eight: Explaining and/or supporting the predictions and hypotheses Phase Nine: Verifying the prediction
SOCIAL SYSTEMThe model has high to moderate structure. It is cooperative, but the teacher is initiatorand controller of activities.
PRINCIPLES OF REACTIONTeacher matches eliciting questions to students' level of cognitive actlvity, determinesstudents' readiness.
SUPPORT SYSTEMStudents need raw data to organize and analyze.
Strategy Two:
Interpretation of Data
Phase Four : Identifying critical relationships
Phase Five: Exploring relationships
Phase Six: Making inferences
Strategy One:
Concept Formation
Phase One: Enumeration and listing
Phase Two: Grouping
Phase Three: Labeling, categorizing
14
THE CONCEPT ATTAINMENT MODEL
This model is closely linked to the Inductive Model. The Concept Attainment Model
also suggests that learners construct their own comprehension of the lesson. This
model is designed to help students reinforce their understanding of concepts and
practice hypothesis testing. However, if Inductive Model solely rely on the positive
examples that represent the concept, this model utilizes both the examples and
non-examples to illustrate the concepts. Since hypothesis testing is particularly
common to describe scientific method; therefore, it is useful in the sciences. This
model is designed to lead students to a concept by asking them to compare and
contrast examples (called exemplars) that contain the characteristics (called
attributes) of the concept with examples that do not contain those attributes.
1. ELEMENTS OF CONCEPTS
A concept has four elements:
(1) A name;
(2) Examples;
(3) Attributes (essential and nonessential); and
(4) Attribute values.
Understanding a concept means knowing all of its elements.
The name is the term given to a category. Fruit, dog, government, ghetto are all
names given to a class of experiences, objects, configurations, or processes.
Although the items commonly grouped together in a single category may differ
from one another in certain respects (dogs, for example, vary greatly), the
15
common features cause them to be referred to by the same general term. Often
we teach ideas that students already know intuitively without knowing the name
itself. For instance, young children often put pictures of fruit together for the
reason that they are "all things you can eat." They are using one characteristic to
describe the concept instead of the name or label. If students know a concept,
however, they can easily learn the name for it, and their verbal expressions will be
more articulate.
The second element, examples, refers to instances of the concept. Part of
knowing a concept is recognizing positive instances of it and also distinguishing
closely related but negative examples. The positive exemplars have something in
common in the work they do in the sentence. The negative exemplars do different
work.
The third and fourth elements of a concept are attributes and attribute value.
Essential attributes are the common features or characteristics that cause us to
place examples in the same category. Exemplars contain nonessential attributes
as well. Although in the supermarket we often see a sign with the price per pound
beside each type of fruit, we know that this sign does not play a role in
distinguishing fruit from other foods or objects. We can refer to cost as a
nonessential attribute of fruit as it appears in the market. Most concepts have
attributes that are often associated with them, but are not essential to them
(women's tennis socks, for example, frequently have tassels). Again, part of
knowing a concept is distinguishing its essential attributes from its nonessential
ones.
2. THE MODEL OF TEACHING
SYNTAX
Phase one involves presenting data to the learner. Each unit of data is a separate
example or non example of the concept. The units are presented in pairs. The data
may be events, people, objects, stories, pictures, or any other discriminable units.
The learners are informed that there is one idea that all the positive examples
16
have in common; their task is to develop a hypothesis about the nature of the
concept. The instances are presented in a prearranged order and are labeled "yes"
or "no." Learners are asked to compare and justify the attributes of the different
examples. (The teacher or students may want to maintain a record of the
attributes.) Finally, they are asked to name their concepts and state the rules or
definitions of the concepts according to their essential attributes. (Their
hypotheses are not confirmed until the next phase; students may not know the
names of some concepts but the names can be provided hen the concepts are
confirmed.)
In phase two, the students test their attainment of the concept, first by correctly
identifying additional unlabeled examples of the concept and then by generating
their own examples. After this the teacher (and students) confirm or disconfirm
their original hypotheses, revising their choice of concepts or attributes as
necessary.
In phase three, students begin to analyze the strategies by which they attain
concepts. As we have indicated, some learners initially try broad constructs and
gradually narrow the field; others begin with more discrete constructs. The
learners can describe their patterns: whether they focused on attributes or
concepts, whether they did so one at a time or several at once, and what
happened when their hypotheses were not confirmed.
The phases of the Concept Attainment Model are outlined in Table
Summary Table : Syntax of the Concept Attainment Model
PHASE ONE: PHASE TWO:PRESENTATION OF DATA AND TESTING ATTAINMENT OF
IDENTIFICATION OF CONCEPT THE CONCEPTTeacher presents labeled examples Students Identify additionalStudent's compare attributes in positive and unlabeled examples as yes or no.negative examples. Teacher confirms hypothesesStudents generate and test hypotheses names concept, and restatesStudents state a definition according to the Definitions according to
17
essential attributes. essential attributes.
Students generate examples
PHASE THREE:
ANALYSIS OF THINKING STRATEGIES
Students describe thoughts.
Students discuss role of hypotheses and
attributes.
Students discuss type and number of
hypotheses.
SOCIAL SYSTEM
Prior to teaching with the Concept Attainment Model, the teacher chooses the
concept, selects and organizes the material into positive and negative examples,
and sequences the examples. Most instructional materials, especially textbooks,
are not designed in a way that corresponds to the nature of concept learning as
described by educational psychologists. In most cases teachers will have to
prepare examples, extract ideas and materials from texts and other sources, and
design them in such a way that the attributes are clear and that there are, indeed,
both positive and negative examples of the concept. When using the Concept
Attainment Model, the teacher acts as a recorder, keeping track of the hypotheses
(concepts)as they are mentioned and of the attributes. The teacher also supplies
additional examples as needed. The three major functions of the teacher during
concept-attainment activity are to record, prompt (cue), and present additional
data. In the initial stages of concept attainment, it is helpful for the examples to be
very structured. However, cooperative learning procedures can also be used
successfully .
PRINCIPLES OF REACTION
During the flow of the lesson the teacher needs to be supportive of the students'
hypotheses-emphasizing, however, that they are hypothetical in nature-and to
create a dialogue in which students test their hypotheses against each others'. In
18
the later phases of the model, the teacher must turn the students' attention
toward analysis of their concepts and their thinking strategies, again being very
supportive. The teacher should encourage analysis of the merits of various
strategies rather than attempt to seek the one best strategy for all people in all
situations.
SUPPORT SYSTEM
Concept attainment lessons require that positive and negative exemplars be
presented to the students. It should be stressed that the students' job in concept
attainment is not to invent new concepts, but to attain the ones need to be known
beforehand and the attributes visible. When students are presented with an
example, they describe its characteristics (attributes), which can then be recorded
that have previously been selected by the teacher. Hence, the data sources
Summary Table : The Concept Attainment Model
SOCIAL SYSTEM
The model has moderate structure. Teacher controls action, but it may develop Into freedialogue within phase. Student interaction encouraged. Relatively structured withstudents assuming more initiative for inductive process as they gain more experiencewith the model (other Concept Attainment Models are ower In structure).
PRINCIPLES OF REACTION
1. Give support but emphasize hypothetical nature of discussion.2. Help students balance one hypothesis against another.3. Focus attention on specific features of examples.4. Assist students In discussing and evaluating their thinking strategies.
SUPPORT SYSTEM
Support consists of carefully selected and organized materials and data in the form ofdiscrete units to serve as examples. As students become more sophisticated, they canshare in making data units, just as in phase two they generate examples
19
ADVANCE ORGANIZERS MODEL
David Ausubel is an unusual educational theorist. First, he directly addresses the
goal of learning subject matter. Second, he advocates the improvement of
presentational methods of teaching (lectures and reading) at a time when other
educational theorists and social critics are challenging the validity of these
methods and finding fault with the "passiveness" of expository learning. In contrast
to those who advocate discovery methods of teaching, "open education," and
experience-based learning, Ausubel stands unabashedly for the mastery of
academic material.
Ausubel is also one of the few educational psychologists to address himself
simultaneously to learning, teaching, and curriculum. His theory of meaningful
verbal learning deals with three concerns:
(1) How knowledge (curriculum content) is organized;
(2) How the mind works to process new information (learning); and
(3) How teachers can apply these ideas about curriculum and learning when they
present new material to students (instruction).
20
Meaningful learning is intellectually linked to what we have learned previously. We
must be able to transform this new knowledge and to apply it creatively in novel
situations. Rote learning, in contrast, typically lacks conceptual and critical
approaches to the information we acquire. It usually does not prepare us to
transform this knowledge or to apply it in new contexts. Furthermore, material
learned by rote is highly subject to forgetting. According to Ausubel, whether or
not material is meaningful depends on the learner and on the material not on the
method of presentation. A meaningful learning set implies that the learner must be
ready to comprehend and relate what is being presented, rather than to memorize
it verbatim.
THE MODEL OF TEACHING
The model of teaching developed here is based on Ausubel's ideas about subject
matter, cognitive structure, active reception learning, and advance organizers.
SYNTAX
The Advance Organizer Model has three phases of activity.
Phase one is the presentation of the advance organizer,
Phase two is the presentation of the learning task or learning material, &
Phase three is the strengthening of cognitive organization. Phase three tests the
relationship of the learning material to existing ideas to bring about an active
learning process.
A summary of the syntax appears in Table.
The activities are designed to increase the clarity and stability of the new learning
material so that fewer ideas are lost, confused with one another, or left vague. The
students should operate on the material as they receive it by relating the new
learning material to personal experience and to their existing cognitive structure,
and by taking a critical stance toward knowledge.
21
Phase one consists of three activities:
clarifying the aims of the lesson,
presenting the advance organizer, and
prompting awareness of relevant knowledge.
Clarifying the aims of the lesson is one way to obtain students' attention and to
orient them to their learning goals, both of which are necessary to facilitate
meaningful learning. (Clarifying aims is also useful to the teacher in planning a
lesson.) As mentioned earlier, the organizer is not just a brief, simple statement; it
is an idea in itself and, like the learning material, must be explored intellectually. It
must also be distinguished from introductory comments, which are useful to the
lesson but are not advance organizers. For instance, when we teach, many of us
begin our instruction by asking students to recall what we did last week or last
year or by telling them what we are going to do tomorrow. In this way, we give
them a context or orientation for our presentation. None of the just described
techniques are advance organizers. However, all of them are part of a well-
organized presentation, and some of them reflect principles that are central to
Ausubel's theory of meaningful verbal learning and are part of the model of
teaching.
The actual organizer, however, is built around the major concepts and/or
propositions of a discipline or area of study.
First, the organizer has to be constructed so that the learner can perceive it for
what it is-an idea distinct from and more inclusive than the material in the learning
task itself. The chief feature of an organizer is thus that it is at a higher level of
abstraction and generality than the learning material itself. This higher level of
abstraction is what distinguishes organizers from introductory overviews, which
are written (or spoken) at the same level of abstraction as the learning material
because they are, in fact, previews of the learning material.
Second, whether the organizer is expository or comparative, the essentia1
22
features of the concept or proposition must be pointed out and carefully explained.
(Definitional statements do not always point out the essential features of the term
being defined.) Thus, the teacher and students must explore the organizer as well
as the learning task. To us, this means citing the essential features, explaining
them, and providing examples. The presentation of an organizer need not be
lengthy, but it must be perceived (the learner must be aware of it), clearly
understood, and continually related to the material it is organizing. This means the
learner must already be familiar with the language and ideas in the organizer.
Finally, to develop an integrative cognitive structure, it is especially important to
prompt awareness of the learner's prior knowledge and experiences that might be
relevant to this learning task and organizer.
Following the presentation of the advance organizer in phase one, phase two
presents the learning material (learning task) in the form of lectures, discussions,
films, experiments, or reading. Two procedures are important here. The first is to
maintain students' attention. Another task is to make the organization of the
learning material explicit to the students so that they have an overall sense of
direction. Related to this is the need to make the logical order of the material
explicit throughout the presentation so that students can see how the ideas relate
to each other. The purpose of phase three is to anchor the new learning material in
the student's existing cognitive structure-that is, to strengthen the student's
cognitive organization.
Ausubel identifies four activities:
(1) Promoting integrative reconciliation;
(2) Promoting active reception learning;
(3) Eliciting a critical approach to subject matter; and
(4) Clarification.
23
There are several ways to facilitate reconciliation of the new material with the
existing cognitive structure. The teacher can:
(1) Remind students of the ideas (the larger picture);
(2) Ask for a summary of the major attributes of the new learning material;
(3) Repeat precise definitions;
(4) Ask for differences between aspects of the material; and
(5) Ask students to describe how the learning material supports the concept or
proposition that is being used as a subsumer.
Active learning can be promoted by:
(1) Asking students to describe how the new material relates to a single aspect of
their existing knowledge;
(2) Asking students for additional examples of the concept or propositions in the
learning material;
(3) Asking students to verbalize the essence of the material, using their own
terminology and frame of reference;
(4) Asking students to examine the material from alternative points of view; and
(5) Relating the material to contradictory material, experience, or knowledge.
SOCIAL SYSTEM
In this model the teacher retains control of the intellectual structure, as it is
continually necessary to relate the learning material to the organizers and to help
students differentiate new material from previously learned material. In phase
three, however, the learning situation is ideally much more interactive, with
students initiating many questions and comments. The successful acquisition of
the material will depend on the learners' desire to integrate it with prior
knowledge, on their critical faculties, and on the teacher's presentation and
organization of the material.
PRINCIPLES OF REACTION
The teacher's solicited or unsolicited responses to the learners' reactions will be
24
guided by the purpose of clarifying the meaning of the new learning material
differentiating it from and reconciling it with existing knowledge making it
personally relevant to the students, and helping to promote a critical approach to
knowledge. Ideally, students will initiate their own questions in response to their
own drives for meaning.
SUPPORT SYSTEM
Well-organized material is the critical support requirement of this model. The
effectiveness of the advance organizer depends on an integral and appropriate
relationship between the conceptual organizer and the content. This model
provides guidelines for building (or reorganizing) instructional materials.
Summary Chart: Advance Organizer Model
SYNTAX
Phase One:Presentation of Advance OrganizerClarify aims of the lesson.Present organizer: Identify defining attributes. Give examples. Provide context. Repeat.Prompt awareness of learner's relevant knowledge and
25
experience.
Phase Two:Presentation of Learning Task or MaterialPresent material.Malntaln attention.Make organization explicit.Make logical order of learning material explicit.
Phase Three:Strengthening Cognitive OrganizationUse principles of integrative reconciliation.Promote active reception learning.Elicit critical approach to subject matter.Clarify
ROLE PLAYING MODEL
In role playing, students explore human-relations problems by enacting problem
situations and then discussing the enactments. Together, students can explore
feelings, attitudes, values, and problem-solving strategies. Several individuals have
experimented with role playing, and their treatments of the strategy are
remarkably similar. This version was formulated by Fannie and George Shaftel
(1967).
Role playing as a model of teaching has roots in both the personal and social
dimensions of education. It attempts to help individual’s find personal meaning
within their social worlds and to resolve personal dilemmas with the work together
in analyzing social situations, especially interpersonal problems, and in developing
decent and democratic ways of coping with these situations. Role playing is placed
in the social family of models because the social group plays such an indispensable
26
part in human development and because of the unique opportunity that role
playing offers for resolving interpersonal and social dilemmas.
On its simplest level, role playing is dealing with problems through action; a
problem is delineated, acted out, and discussed. Some students are role players;
others observe. A person puts himself or herself in the position of another person
and then tries to interact with others who are also playing roles. As empathy,
sympathy, anger, and affection are all generated during the interaction, role
playing, if done well, becomes a part of life. This emotional content, as well as the
words and the actions, become part of the later analysis. When the acting out is
finished, even the observers are involved enough to want to know why each
person reached his or her decision, what the sources of resistance were, and
whether there were other ways this situation could have been approached. The
essence of role playing is the involvement of participants and observers in a real
problem situation and the desire for resolution and understanding that this
involvement engenders.
The role playing process provides a live sample of human behavior that serves as a
vehicle for students to:
(1) Explore their feelings;
(2) Gain insights into their attitudes, values, and perceptions;
(3) Develop their problem-solving skills and attitudes; and
(4) Explore subject matter in varied ways.
The Shaftel’s version of role playing emphasizes the intellectual content as much
as the emotional content; analysis and discussion of the enactment are as
important as the role playing itself. We, as educators, are concerned that students
recognize and understand their feelings and see how their feelings influence their
behavior.
27
THE MODEL OF TEACHING
SYNTAX
The benefits of role playing depend on the quality of the enactment and especially
on the analysis that follows. They depend also on the students' perceptions of the
role as similar to real-life situations.
The Shaftel’s suggest that the role playing activity consist of nine steps:
(1) Warm up the group;
(2) Select participants;
(3) Set the stage;
(4) Prepare observers;
(5) Enact;
(6) Discuss and evaluate;
(7) Re-enact;
(8) Discuss and evaluate; and
(9) Share experiences and generalize.
Each of these steps or phases has a specific purpose that contributes to the
richness and focus of the learning activity. Together, they ensure that a line of
thinking is pursued throughout the complex of activities, that students are
prepared in their roles that goals for the role play are identified, and that the
discussion afterwards is not simply a collection of diffuse reactions, though these
are important too.
In Phase one,
WARM UP THE GROUP, involves introducing students to a problem so that they
recognize it as an area with which everyone needs to learn to deal. The warm-up
can begin for example, by identifying a problem within the group. The second part
of the warm up is to express the problem vividly through examples. These may
28
come from student descriptions of imaginary or real situations that express the
problem, or from situations selected by the teacher and illustrated by a film,
television show, or problem story. The last part of the warm up is to ask questions
that make the children think about and predict the outcome of the story.
In Phase two,
SELECT PARTICIPANTS, the children and the teacher describe the various
characters-what they are like, how they feel, and what they might do. The children
are then asked to volunteer to role play; they may even ask to play a particular
role. The Shaftel’s caution us against assigning a role to a child who has been
suggested for it, because the person making the suggestion may be stereotyping
the child or putting him or her in an awkward situation. A person must want to play
a role.
In Phase three,
SET THE STAGE, the role players outline the scene but do not prepare any
specific dialogue. They simply sketch the setting and perhaps one person's line of
action. The teacher may help set the stage by asking the students a few simple
questions about where the enactment is taking place, what it is like, and so on.
In Phase four,
PREPARE THE OBSERVERS, it is important that the observers become actively
involved so that the entire group experiences the enactment and can later analyze
the play. The Shaftel’s suggest that the teacher involve observers in the role play
by assigning them tasks, such as evaluating the realism of the role playing,
commenting on the effectiveness and the sequences of the role players' behavior,
and defining the feelings and ways of thinking of the persons being portrayed. The
observers should determine what the role players are trying to accomplish, what
actions the role players took that were helpful or not helpful, and what alternative
experiences might have been enacted. Or they can watch one particular role to
define the feelings of that person. The observers should understand that there will
29
be more than one enactment in most cases, and if they would have acted out a
certain role in a different way, they may have a chance to do so.
At Phase five,
ENACT, the players assume the roles and "live" the situation spontaneously,
responding realistically to one another. The role playing is not expected to be a
smooth dramatization, nor is it expected that each role player will always know
how to respond. This uncertainty is part of life, as well as part of feeling the role. A
person may have a general idea of what to say or do but not be able to enact it
when the time comes. The action now depends on the children and emerges
according to what happens in the situation. This is why the preparatory steps are
so important.
In Phase six,
DISCUSS AND EVALUATE, if the problem is an important one than the
participants and the observers are intellectually and emotionally involved, then the
discussion will probably begin spontaneously. At first, the discussion may focus on
different interpretations of the portrayal and on disagreements over how the roles
should have been carried out. More important, however, are the consequences of
the action and the motivations of the actors.
In Phase seven,
RE-ENACT, the re-enactment may take place many times. The students and the
teacher can share new interpretations of roles and decide whether new individuals
should play them. The activity alternates between discussion and acting. As much
as possible, the new enactments should explore new possibilities for causes and
effects. In the discussion that follows the second enactment, phase eight, discuss
and evaluate, students are willing to accept the solution, but the teacher pushes
for a realistic solution by asking whether they think this ending could really
happen.
30
In Phase eight,
DISCUSS AND EVALUATE (as in phase six)
Phase nine,
SHARE EXPERIENCES AND GENERALIZE, should not be expected to result
immediately in generalizations about the human-relations aspects of the situation.
Such generalizations require much experience. The teacher should, however,
attempt to shape the discussion so that the children, perhaps after long experience
with the role playing strategy, begin to generalize about approaches to problem
situations and the consequences of those approaches. The more adequate the
shaping of the discussion, the more general will be the conclusions reached, and
the closer the children will come to hypothetical principles of action they can use in
their own lives.
THE SOCIAL SYSTEM
The social system in this model is moderately structured. Teachers are
responsible, at least initially, for starting the phases and guiding students through
the activities within each phase; however, the particular content of
the discussions and enactments is determined largely by the students. The
teachers' questions and comments should encourage free and honest expression
of ideas and feelings. Teachers must establish equality and trust between
themselves and their students. They can do this by accepting all suggestions as
legitimate and making no value judgments. In this way, they simply reflect the
children's feelings or attitudes. Even though teachers are chiefly reflective and
supportive, they assume direction as well. They often select the problem to be
explored, lead the discussion, choose the actors, make decisions about when the
enactments are to be done, help design the enactments, and most significant,
decide what to probe for and what suggestions to explore. In essence, the teachers
shape the exploration of behavior by the types of questions they ask and, through
questioning,
establish the focus.
31
PRlNClPLES OF REACTION
We have identified five principles of reaction that are important to this model.
First, teachers should accept student responses and suggestions, especially their
opinions and feelings, in a non evaluative manner.
Second, teachers should respond in such a way that they help the students explore
various sides of the problem situation, recognizing and contrasting alternative
points of view.
Third, by reflecting, paraphrasing and summarizing responses the teacher
increases students' awareness of their own views and feelings
THE SUPPORT SYSTEM
The materials for role playing are minimal but important. The major curricular tool
is the problem situation. However, it is sometimes helpful to construct briefing
sheets for each role. These sheets describe the role or the character's feelings.
Occasionally, we also develop forms for the observers that tell them what to look
for and give them a place to write it down. Films, novels, and short stories make
excellent sources for problem situations.
Problem stories or outlines of problem situations are also useful. Problem stories,
as their name implies, are short narratives that describe the setting,
circumstances, actions, and dialogue of a situation. One or more of the characters
faces a dilemma in which a choice must be made oran action taken. The story ends
unresolved. Many resource materials now commercially available include stories or
problem stories whose endings can be omitted or changed. Books by the Shaftels
and by Chesler and Fox each contain a section of problem stories.
Summary Chart: Role Playing Model
SYNTAXPhase One: Phase Six:Warm Up the group Discuss and Evaluateidentify or Introduce problem. Review action of role play (events, positions, realism).Make problem explicit. Discuss major focus.Interpret problem story, explore Issues. Develop next enactment.Explain role playing.
Phase Seven:Phase Two: Reenact
32
Select Participants Play revised roles; suggest next steps or behavioral alternatives.Analyze roles.Select role players. Phase Eight:
Discuss and EvaluatePhase Three: (As in phase six)Set the StageSet line of action. Phase Nine:Restate roles. Share Experiences end GeneralizeGet inside problem situation. Relate problem situation to real experience and current problems,
Explore general principles ol behavior.Phase FourPrepare the Observersdecide what to look for.Assign observation tasks,
Phase Five:EnactBegin role play.Maintain role playBreak role play.
SOCIAL SYSTEMThe model is moderately structured. The teacher is responsible for initiating the phases and guiding students through the activities within each phase.The particular content of the discussions and enactments is determined largely by the students.
PRINCIPLES OF REACTIONAccept all student responses In a non-evaluative manner.Help students explore various sides of the problem situation and compare alternative views.increase students' awareness of their own views and feelings by reflecting, paraphrasing, and summarizing their responses.Use the concept of role, and emphasize that there are different ways to play a role.Emphasize that there are alternative ways to resolve a problem.
SUPPORT SYSTEMRole playing is an experience based model and requires minimal support material out-side of the initial problem situation.
LEARN THROUGH SIMULATION - CYBERNETIC’S PRINCIPLES
Simulations have been used increasingly in education over the last thirty
years, but the Simulation Model did not originate within the field of education.
Rather, it is an application of the principles of cybernetics, a branch of
psychology. Cybernetic psychologists, making an analogy between humans and
machines, conceptualize the learner as a self-regulating feedback system. As a
33
discipline, cybernetic’ “has been described as the comparative study of the human
(or biological) control mechanism, and electromechanical systems such as
computers ” (Smith and Smith, 1969, p. 202). The central focus is the apparent
similarity between the feedback control mechanisms of electromechanical systems
and human systems. "A feedback control system incorporates three primary
functions: it generates movement of the system toward a target or defined path; it
compares the effects of this action with the true path and detects error; and it
utilizes this error signal to redirect the system (Smith and Smith, 1969, p. 203).
The cybernetic psychologist interprets the human being as a control system that
generates a course of action and then redirects or corrects the action by means of
feedback. This can be a very complicated process-as when the secretary of state
reevaluates foreign policy-or a very simple one-as when we notice that our sailboat
is heading into the wind too much and we ease off on our course just a little. In
using the analogy of mechanical systems as a frame of reference for analyzing
human beings, psychologists came up with the central idea "that performance and
learning must be analyzed in terms of the control relationships between a human
operator and an instrumental situation. That is, learning was understood to be
determined by the nature of the individual, as well as by the design of the learning
situation (Smith and Smith, 1969, p. vii).
All human behavior, according to cybernetic psychology, involves a perceptible
pattern of motion. This includes both covert behavior, such as thinking and
symbolic behavior, and overt behavior. In any given situation, individuals modify
their behavior according to the feedback they receive from the environment. They
organize their movements and their response patterns in relation to this feedback.
Thus, their own sensory motor capabilities form the basis of their feedback
systems. This ability to receive feedback constitutes the human system's
mechanism for receiving and sending information.
As human beings develop greater linguistic capability, they are able to use indirect
as well as direct feedback, thereby expanding their control over the physical and
34
social environment. That is, they are less dependent on the concrete realities of
the environment because they can use its symbolic representations. The essence,
then, of cybernetic psychology is the principle of sense-oriented feedback that is
intrinsic to the individual (one "feels" the effects of one's decisions) and is the
basis for self-corrective choices. Individuals can "feel" the effects of their decisions
because the environment responds in full, rather than simply "You're right" or
"Wrong! Try again." That is, the environmental consequences of their choices are
played back to them. Learning in cybernetic terms is sensorially experiencing the
environmental consequences of one's behavior and engaging in self-corrective
behavior. Instruction in cybernetic terms is designed to create an environment for
the learner in which this full feedback takes place.
SIMULATIONS IN EDUCATION
The application of cybernetic principles to educational procedures is seen
most dramatically and clearly in the development of simulators. A simulator is a
training device that represents reality very closely, but in which the complexity of
events can be controlled. For example, a simulated automobile has been
constructed in which the driver sees a road (by means of a motion picture), has a
wheel to turn, a clutch and a brake to operate, a gear-shift, and all the other
devices of a contemporary automobile. The driver can start this simulated
automobile, and when he or she turns the key he or she hears the noise of a motor
running. When the driver presses the accelerator the noise increases in volume, so
he or she has the sensation of having actually increased the flow of gas to a real
engine.
As the person drives, the film shows curves in the road and, as he or she turns the
wheel, he or she may experience the illusion that the automobile is turning. The
simulator can present the student with learning tasks to which he or she can
respond, but the responses do not have the same consequences that they would
have in a real-life situation; the simulated automobile does not crash into anything,
although it may look like it is crashing from the driver's point of view. And in the
manner of training psychology, the tasks presented can be made less complex
35
than those a driver would have to execute in the real world; this way, it is easier
for him or her to acquire the skills he or she will need later for actual driving. For
example, in a driving simulator the student can simply practice shifting from one
gear to another until he or she has mastered the task. The student can also
practice applying the brakes and turning the wheel until he or she has a feel for
how the automobile responds when he or she does those things.
The advantages of a simulator are several. The learning tasks can be made much
less complex than they are in the real world, so that the students may have the
opportunity to master tasks that would be extremely difficult when all the factors
of real-world operations impinge upon them. For example, learning how to fly a
complex airplane without the aid of a simulator leaves very little room for error:
The student pilot has to do everything adequately the first time, or the plane is in
difficulty. With the use of a simulator the training can be staged. The trainee can
be introduced to simple tasks, and then more complex ones, until he or she builds
a repertoire of skills adequate for piloting the plane. In addition, difficulties such as
storms and mechanical problems can be simulated, and the student can learn how
to cope with them. Thus, by the time the student actually begins flying he or she
has built the repertoire of necessary skills.
A second advantage of simulators is that they permit students to learn from self-
generated feedback. As the student pilot turns the wheel of the great plane to the
right, for example, he or she can feel the plane bank, he or she can feel the loss of
speed in some respects, and he or she can learn how to trim the craft during the
turn. In other words, the trainee can learn through his or her own senses, rather
than simply through verbal descriptions, the corrective behaviors that are
necessary. In the driving simulation, if the driver heads into curves too rapidly and
then has to jerk the wheel to avoid going off the road, this feedback permits him or
her to adjust his or her behavior so that when he or she is on a real road he or she
will turn more gingerly as he or she approaches sharp curves. The cybernetic
psychologist designs simulators so that the feedback about the consequences of
behavior enables the learners to modify their responses and develop a repertoire
36
of appropriate behaviors.
Some very elaborate applications of cybernetic psychology have been made in
military training. For example, in a submarine simulator several members of the
crew can communicate with one another by radio and other devices. They are able
to take their "submarine" under water, maneuver it against enemy ships, raise
their periscope, sight ships through it, and fire torpedoes. The simulator is
constructed so it can be attacked by enemy destroyers and can emerge and
engage in evasive action; the crew can hear the enemy only over sonar and other
undersea listening devices.
SOCIAL SYSTEM
Because the teacher selects the simulation activity and directs the students
through carefully delineated activities, the social system of simulation is rigorous.
Within this structured system, however, a cooperative interactive environment
can, and ideally should, flourish. The ultimate success of the simulation, in fact,
depends partly on the cooperation and willing participation of the students.
Working together, the students share ideas, which are subject to peer evaluation
but not teacher evaluation. The peer social system, then, should be non-
threatening and marked by cooperation.
PRINCIPLES OF REACTION
The reactions of the teacher are primarily those of a facilitator. Throughout the
simulation he or she must maintain a non-evaluative but supportive attitude. It is
the teacher's task to first present and then facilitates understanding and
interpretation of the rules of the simulation activity. In addition, should interest in
the activity begin to dissipate or attention begins to focus on irrelevant issues, he
or she must direct the group to "get on with the game."
SUPPORT SYSTEM
Simulation requires support materials ranging from simple teacher made games, to
marketed games to specifically designed simulators such car driving or airplane-
navigating simulators. Simulations are gaining in popularity, and the number of
37
pumsnea materials increases every year. The 1973 Social Science Education
Consortium Data Book lists more than fifty simulations available for use in social
studies alone. The teacher who is interested in using simulations is directed to
publishers' catalogs; the mentioned Data Handbook(l971,1972,1973);Ronald
Kleitsch, Directory of Educational Simulations, Learning Games, and Didatic Units
(1979); David Zuckernlan and Robert Horn, The Guide to Simulation Games for
Education and Training (1970); and Ron Stadsklev, Handbook of Simulation
Gaming in Social Education (n.d.).
SOCIAL SYSTEMThe social system is structured by the teacher through selecting materials and directingthe simulation. The interactive environment of the class, however, should be non threateningand marked by cooperation. The teacher has the role of managing thesimulation(taking care of organization and logistics), explaining the game, maintainingthe rules, coaching (offering advice, prompting), and Conducting the deorlefmg a1sct.s.sfon.PRINCIPLES OF REACTION1. DO not evaluate plavers' decisions and moves2. Facilitates student's understanding and interpretation of rules.3. Encourage participation and help the students cope with uncertainty4. Tell students to "get on with the game" when necessary.SUPPORT SYSTEMSimulation requires a carefully structured base of resource materials
CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORY
Learners are encouraged to discover facts and relationships for themselves.
Bruner, 2001
A major theme in the theoretical framework of the constructivist theory is an active
process in which learners construct new ideas or concepts based upon their own
38
knowledge. Constructivists emphasize on the importance of learners’ reliance on
cognitive structures to select and transform information, construct hypotheses and
make decisions. Cognitive structures such as schema, mental models, attitudes
and scripts, which are related to behaviour, provide meaning and organization to
experiences and allow the individual to go beyond the information given. However,
this relationship is often complex, thus, making it difficult to generalize result
across tasks and domain differences (Kearsley, 2003; Huitt, 1999). Consequently,
the constructivists suggest a behaviorally-oriented curriculum (Huitt, 1999) in
which knowledge and skills are taught inductively in a constructivistically -
oriented classroom (Huitt, 1999) that require learners to carry out tasks
implementing critical thinking.
According to the constructivists, as far as instruction is concerned, teachers should
encourage students to discover principles by themselves. The teacher and learners
should engage in an active dialogue. The task of the teacher is to translate
information to be learnt into a format appropriate to the learners’ current state of
understanding; therefore, lesson plan should be organized in a manner in which
students could continually build upon what they have already learnt.
Bruner (1966) states that a theory of instruction should address four major
aspects:
(1) Predisposition towards learning,
(2) The ways in which a body of knowledge can be structured so that it can be
most readily grasped by the learner,
(3) The most effective sequences in which to present material, and
(4) The nature and pacing of rewards and punishments. Good methods for
structuring knowledge should result in simplifying, generating new propositions,
and increasing the manipulation of information.
39
In his more recent work, Bruner (1986, 1990, 1996) has expanded his theoretical
framework to encompass the social and cultural aspects of learning as well as the
practice of law
James Bruner provides the following principles of constructivist learning:
1. Instruction must be concerned with the experiences and contexts that make
the student willing and able to learn (readiness).
2. Instruction must be structured so that it can be easily grasped by the student
(spiral organization).
3. Instruction should be designed to facilitate extrapolation and/or fill in the
gaps (going beyond the information given).
(Kearsley, 2002; Huitt, 1999)
Thus, this shows that there should be an adequacy between learners’ acquisition of
knowledge and skills, and the development of their thinking skill. The
constructivists propose three teaching models, namely the Inductive Model, the
Concept Attainment Model and the Integrative Model.
It could be argued that constructivism emphasizes the importance of the world
knowledge, beliefs, and skills an individual brings to bear on learning. Viewing the
construction of new knowledge as a combination of prior learning matched against
new information, and readiness to learn, this theory opens up new perspectives,
leading individuals to informed choices about what to accept and how to fit it into
their existing schemata, as well as what to reject. Recapitulating the main
principles of constructivism, we could say that it emphasises learning and not
40
teaching, encourages learner autonomy and personal involvement in learning,
looks to learners as incumbents of significant roles and as agents exercising will
and purpose, fosters learners’ natural curiosity, and also takes account of learners’
affect, in terms of their beliefs, attitudes, and motivation. In addition, within
constructivist theory, context is accorded significance, as it renders situations and
events meaningful and relevant, and provides learners with the opportunity to
construct new knowledge from authentic experience
Constructivism is both a philosophy and a theory of learning. The key concept of
constructivism is that learning is an active process of creating, rather than
acquiring, knowledge. The following principles provides general framework of
constructivism and its relevance for instruction
Learning Principles in Constructivism
1. Learning is an active process in which the learner uses sensory input and
constructs meaning out of it. The more traditional formulation of this idea
involves the terminology of the active learner (Dewey’s term) stressing that
the learner needs to do something; that learning is not the passive
acceptance of knowledge which exists “out there” but that learning involves
the learner s engaging with the world.
41
2. People learn to learn as they learn: learning consists both of
constructing meaning and constructing systems of meaning. For example, if
we learn the chronology of dates of a series of historical events, we are
simultaneously learning the meaning of a chronology. Each meaning we
construct makes us better able to give meaning to other sensations which
can fit a similar pattern.
3. The crucial action of constructing meaning is mental: it happens in the
mind. Physical actions, hands-on experience may be necessary for learning,
especially for children, but it is not sufficient; we need to provide activities
which engage the mind as well as the hands (Dewey called this reflective
activity.)
4. Learning involves language: the language we use influences learning. On
the empirical level. Researchers have noted that people talk to themselves
as they learn. On a more general level. There is a collection of arguments,
presented most forcefully by Vigotsky, that language and learning are
inextricably intertwined. This point was clearly emphasized in Elaine Gurain’s
reference to the need to honor native language in developing North
American exhibits. The desire to have material and programs in their own
language was an important request by many members of various Native
American communities.
5. Learning is a social activity: our learning is intimately associated with our
connection with other human beings, our teachers, our peers, our family as
well as casual acquaintances, including the people before us or next to us at
the exhibit. We are more likely to be successful in our efforts to educate if we
recognize this principle rather than try to avoid it. Much of traditional
education, as Dewey pointed out, is directed towards isolating the learner
42
from all social interaction, and towards seeing education as a one-on-one
relationship between the learner and the objective material to be learned. In
contrast, progressive education (to continue to use Dewey’s formulation)
recognizes the social aspect of learning and uses conversation, interaction
with others, and the application of knowledge as an integral aspect of
learning.
6. Learning is contextual: we do not learn isolated facts and theories in some
abstract ethereal land of the mind separate from the rest of our lives: we
learn in relationship to what else we know, what we believe, our prejudices
and our fears. On reflection, it becomes clear that this point is actually a
corollary of the idea that learning is active and social. We cannot divorce our
learning from our lives.
7. One needs knowledge to learn: it is not possible to assimilate new
knowledge without having some structure developed from previous
knowledge to build on. The more we know, the more we can learn. Therefore
any effort to teach must be connected to the state of the learner must
provide a path into the subject for the learner based on that learner’s
previous knowledge.
It takes time to learn: learning is not instantaneous. For significant learning
we need to revisit ideas, ponder them try them out, play with them and use
them. If you reflect on anything you have learned, you soon realize that it is
the product of repeated exposure and thought. Even, or especially, moments
of profound insight, can be traced back to longer periods of preparation.
8. It takes time to learn: learning is not instantaneous. For significant
learning we need to revisit ideas, ponder them try them out, play with them
and use them. This cannot happen in the 5-10 minutes usually spent in a
gallery (and certainly not in the few seconds usually spent contemplating a
single museum object.) If you reflect on anything you have learned, you soon
43
realize that it is the product of repeated exposure and thought. Even, or
especially, moments of profound insight, can be traced back to longer
periods of preparation.
9. Motivation is a key component in learning. Not only is it the case that
motivation helps learning, it is essential for learning. This idea of motivation
as described here is broadly conceived to include an understanding of ways
in which the knowledge can be used. Unless we know “the reasons why”, we
may not be very involved in using the knowledge that may be instilled in us.
Even by the most severe and direct teaching.
44
Learning Discovery Reception Assisted (Scaffolding)
Background Jerome Brunner (1966) David Ausubel (1968) Lev Semyonovich VygotskyDefinition Teaching methods in which students are
encouraged to discover principles for themselves.
Teaching method in which the teacher structures the learning situation to select materials that are appropriate for students and then presents them in well-organized lessons that progress from generic to specific details.
Teacher guides instruction, so that students will master and internalize the skills that permit higher cognitive functioning.
Principles Top-down: start with complex problem and work out or discover basic skills to solve
Cooperative learning Experimentation Open-ended problems Learn on own through active
involvement with concepts and principles
Teacher structures learning situation Expository teaching Students actively involved in learning
process Use of prior knowledge for new
learning Knowledge continually changes once
“inside” the learner’s minds
Individuals construct knowledge by working to solve realistic problems, usually in collaboration with others.
Learning as a change in meaning constructed from experience.
Individual interpretation of experience vs. objective representation (information processing perspective)
Applications for Instruction
1. Encourage independence in early school career
2. Encourage students to solve problems on own or in groups
3. Learning should be flexible and exploratory
4. Arouse children’s curiosity
5. Minimize risk of failure
6. Relevant learning
7. Return to important concepts
1. Incoming information must be integrated into what students already know
2. Teachers should use a deductive teaching approach
3. Organize instruction beforehand: general concepts first then move to inclusive details
4. plan brief class discussions before new material is presented so students can share important background information
1. Pose "good" problems - realistically complex and personally meaningful.
2. Create group learning activities.
3. Model and guide the knowledge construction process
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORY by different Psychologist
45
BIBLIOGRAPHY
http://imet.csus.edu/classic/fundamentals/inductive/index.html
http://imet.csus.edu/imet3/odell/portfolio/grartifacts/Lit%20review.pdf .
http://www.coe.ufl.edu/webtech/greatideas/pages/peoplepage/taba.htm
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~best/html/learning/advorg.htm
http://hagar.up.ac.za/catts/learner/cooplrn/b3.html
http://helpingstudents.org/JSPWiki/attach/ConceptAttainment/
DanaWConcept_Attainment_Model.ppt .
http://imet.csus.edu/imet3/odell/portfolio/grartifacts/Lit%20review.pdf .
http://www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/resources/constructivistlearning.html
http://my-ecoach.com/idtimeline/constructivism.html
http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/constructivism.html.
http://olc.spsd.sk.ca/DE/PD/instr/strats/cattain/index.html
http://dlibed.kku.ac.th/e_lib2/exxe/42.pdf.
46