models and modeling in geomechanics
DESCRIPTION
Models and Modeling in Geomechanics. Maurice Dusseault. Models and Modeling. A “Model” is a simplified version of reality Complexity, heterogeneity have been reduced Small-scale details have been omitted Complex behavioral laws have been “linearized” Boundary conditions have been simplified - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Models and Modeling in GeomechanicsModels and Modeling in Geomechanics
Maurice Dusseault
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Models and ModelingModels and Modeling
A “Model” is a simplified version of reality Complexity, heterogeneity have been reduced Small-scale details have been omitted Complex behavioral laws have been “linearized” Boundary conditions have been simplified
“The right horse for the right course” The model should not be too complex
Computational time increases (parametric analysis hard) It becomes difficult to understand the results
Also, it should not be too simple!
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
To Model is to Understand…To Model is to Understand…
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Types of Models…Types of Models…
Conceptual model Based on physical understanding of the process
Geological models Lithostratigraphic model Structural geological model Depositional model 3-D “whole-earth” data base model, etc., etc.
Mathematical or Numerical model Material behavior model And so on and so forth…
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Conceptual Models Precede RealityConceptual Models Precede Reality
Horizontal wells in Venezuela for heavy oil development, Conoco-Phillips
Conceptual model - 1999
Real installation - 2003
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Simple Stratigraphic ModelSimple Stratigraphic Model
~6
50 m
Casing shear
locations
Surficial deposits
Colorado shales
Grand Rapids Formation
Clearwater Formation
McMurray Fmn.Oil Sands
Limestones
Sequence of sands, shales, etc.
(Alberta Oil Sands)(Alberta Oil Sands)
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Estuarine Accretion ModelEstuarine Accretion Model
A conceptual model to explain estuarine
sedimentation processes
No scale
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Geological Models: Logs Geological Models: Logs →→ Rocks Rocks
REG. TIPO
SVS-30
REG. TIPO
SVS-337
SMI
GUASARE
C-7
C-6
C-5
C-4
C-3
C-1
B-6/9
GUASARE
FALLA ICOTEA
ER-EO
FA
LL
A V
LE
-400
C-4C-5
C-6
C-7
GUAS
GUASARE
C-7
C-6
C-5
C-4
C-3
ER-EO
B-SUP
B-6/9
C-1
C-3C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-2C-2
ER-EO
B-6/9
B-6/9
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5C-3
C-5
C-2
C-4
C-6
C-7
C-7
C-6C-5C-4C-3C-2
C-1
C-2
C-3
ER-EO
B-SUP
B-SUP
2-D structural section modelPDVSA
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Model of Fault TracesModel of Fault Traces
In the centre of Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela
Only the fault traces at the reservoir depth are shown
Fault-block controlled oil field (Lago Medio)
In fact, faults are far more complex… Splay structures En-echelon faults Gouge zones……
BLOQUE IX
BLQ. XIV
BLOQUE X
PDVSA
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Geophysical and Geological ModelsGeophysical and Geological Models
Stratigraphy
ConocoPhillips
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Campos Basin Model, BrasilCampos Basin Model, Brasil
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Numerical ModelsNumerical Models
This mesh is part of a geomechanics model for numerical σ-ε analysis
The smallest grid block is 5050100 m size
A lab specimen perhaps only 5050100 mm!!
Clearly, the numerical model is a simplification of a complex reality…
Sandia Nat’l Labs
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Mathematical Modeling & ScaleMathematical Modeling & Scale
553 km = 75109 m3
81515 m = 2370 m3
115 m = 5 m3
Rock sample = 0.001 m3
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Model of “Stacked” Solution CavernsModel of “Stacked” Solution Caverns
Circular shapes assumed, allowing a 1-D (radial) model. Also, details are ignored…
“Reality”, from sonar scan
Model for creep analysis of gas storage caverns in salt
(ignored)
Terralog Technologies Inc.
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
A Reservoir Isopach ModelA Reservoir Isopach Model
Terralog Technologies Inc. 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0Net sand thickness in feet
X coordinate distance – feet
Y c
oord
inat
e di
stan
ce –
feet
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Seismic ModelSeismic Model
Channel structures
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
3-D “Whole Earth” Model3-D “Whole Earth” Model
Well path
Stratigraphic surfaces
Based on geophysical logs + core data + high-resolution surface seismic
Bill Huang, 2003,
Chevron
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Casing Deformation ProblemCasing Deformation Problem
Ter
ralo
g T
echn
olog
ies
Inc.
tubi
ng
Concept
Reality Mathematical Model (FEM)
Mathematical models are based on concepts that
are models of reality
casing cement
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Detail in RepresentationDetail in Representation
Ekofisk geological model 19185 km model size Goal was to simulate
Overall reservoir behavior Seafloor subsidence…
Numerical model had 674124 elements Four materials No discontinuities Hypo-elastic model
Chin et al. 2003 ConocoPhillips
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Ekofisk Model ResultsEkofisk Model Results
Chin et al. 2003 ConocoPhillips
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Model ComplexityModel Complexity
The Ekofisk model had 66,000 elements, but… Well over 1 million degrees of freedom A highly complex material behavior law (Chalk) Properties that are functions of σ′ and p Full flow-coupling to geomechanics behavior
Using a finite difference flow simulator in parallel Compaction bridging effects (some heterogeneity)
For one solution (i.e. one set of parameters) 30 year simulation, >600 iterations, 1.5 hours CPU
And, the results were quite good…
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Material Behavior ModelsMaterial Behavior Models
Scale issues, representativeness, scatter of data, similarity to stress path in the field, etc., etc., are all relevant issues in material models.
strain - εa
stre
ss –
(σ
1 –
σ3)
sudden yield
strain - εa
ΔV+ve
-ve
strain - εa
stre
ss –
(σ
1 –
σ3)
sudden yield
strain - εa
ΔV+ve
-ve
Lab test σ ε curve
Model used in calculations
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
How Do We “Model” This Rock Mass?How Do We “Model” This Rock Mass?
Joints and fractures often dominate flow and deformation behavior
Representative testing is generally never possible
So, of what value is an extremely complex behavioral law based on small test specimens?
1 m
A large core specimenA core “plug”
Machu Picchu, Peru, Inca Stonecraftrock
n
100 mm
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Local, Reservoir and Regional Scales Local, Reservoir and Regional Scales
Regional Scale Stresses Basin scale: 50 km to 1000 km Often called “far-field stresses”
Reservoir Scale Stresses A reservoir, or part of a reservoir Scale from 500 m to several km Salt dome region: 5-20 km affected zone
Local Scale Stresses Borehole region: 1-5 m Drawdown zone (well scale) 100-1000 m
Small Scale Stresses (less than 10-20 cm)
~100 km
~4 km
~400 m
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Granular ModelsGranular Models
Rocks are heterogeneous at all scales (microns to kilometers)
In granular media, macroscopic stresses are transmitted through grain contact forces (fn, fs)
fs = shear force
fn = normal force
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Granular ModelsGranular Models
Most behavior aspects of granular media can be emulated in a 2-D model with only a few thousand elliptical “grains”!
A 3-D model with 10,000 grains is betterRealityModel
0.10 mm
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Guidelines for all Types of ModelsGuidelines for all Types of Models
Think carefully about what you are trying to represent in your model
The data base may be extremely densely populated, but the model much less so…
Avoid all unnecessary complexity Most geomechanics problems can be reasonably
solved with a linear elastic rock model, 6-8 GMUs Keep the geometry and BC’s simple Increase complexity only when it is necessary
E.g.: going to an elastoplastic reservoir rock model
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
A Coupled Geomechanics ModelA Coupled Geomechanics Model
Reservoirsimulator
Geomechanicssimulator
FD
FEM
Solve the flow problem for new Δt increment
Output pressures
Solve σ′ ε problem
Pressures applied as nodal loads
ΔT can be included as well
T
L
L
1T
Kv
Calculate stressesstrains, ΔV
Apply as source-sink terms
to reservoir simulator
Error OK?N
Y
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Coupled Geomechanics ModelCoupled Geomechanics Model
This approaches uses pre-existing powerful reservoir simulators for diffusion problems
The iteration loop converges very rapidly The approach is rigorous The logic is straightforward You can introduce non-linearities easily…
k = ƒ(σ′) Non-linear stiffness - C = ƒ(σ′) And so on
©MBDCI©MBDCI
Models and Modeling
Different Analysis ModelsDifferent Analysis Models
Empirical Model, also a Physical Model Probabilistic or Stochastic Model Closed-Form Solution (Analytic Solution) Semi-Analytic Solution (Integrals…) Mathematical models
Finite Difference methods Finite Element method Boundary Element methods Streamline models for flow problems