modeling a real backdraft indcident fire

8/10/2019 Modeling a real backdraft indcident fire

1/12


2/12


3/12

After some minutes, two of the firefighters, entered the house and throughthe stairs, reached the second floor room. They reported that the second floor was atthat time fully charged with smoke. They opened the door, entered the bedroom andwhile orienteering to reach the window, one of them saw in the dark a small flame.Soon after a flame front invested them, while propagating backward to the doorwayand then into the stairwell. The flame vented out through a window left open locatedin proximity of the first floor on the front of the house and then extinguished after fewseconds. Thanks to the personnel protection equipment, the two firefighters did notsuffer appreciable burn injuries. An amateur video recorded the scene and became animportant source of information when later reviewed by the fire department. The tapeshowed the flame venting out through the only fully open window, without appreciableflame persistence.

Damage to the house was mainly limited to the bedroom originating thefire - closed door prevented fire spreading. There was no fire extension to the otherrooms or to the adjacent buildings and no structural damage observed.

QUADERNIDISCIENZA&TECNICA

31

Figure 2 : Detail of the 2nd floor stairwaylamp showing cover destruction.

Figure 3 : 2nd floor stairway. The roomoriginating the fire is on the left side.


4/12


5/12


33

Figure 5 : Detail of one room wall (nextto the Figure 4).

Figure 6 : Detail of the bedroom door(next to Figure 5).


6/12

The bed showed signs of pyrolysis and limited burning on the upperportions of the back cushions (Figure 7). The triangular shape of the combusted partwas attributed to the fire propagation from an adjacent furniture, gone completelycarbonized.

Figure 7 : Detail of the bed.

The information provided by the firefighters involved and the evidencedescribed was of a classic backdraft, usually persisting only few seconds before

exhausting its fuel supply. The fire investigation determined that the fire started as aconsequence of the smoldering combustion of the material contained in a wardrobe,located adjacent to a wall, that contained inside a flue gas duct of an adjacent housechimney. A slow soot combustion fire occurred in the flue gas duct. This initial eventprovided the heat source that, by thermal conduction through the poor insulating wall,originated the smoldering combustion inside the wardrobe. It was witnessed that thewardrobe got usually warm even during normal chimney operation. The occupants and


34

3 CAUSE AND ORIGIN


7/12

the firefighters confirmed that the bedroom door and the window were initially keptclosed, so that there were negligible external source of combustion air. After thefirefighters opened slightly the bedroom window, acting from the outside, the videoshows an increase in the smoke production. However, when the firefighters opened thedoor, the resulting fire gases, rich in carbon monoxide, flowed downward into thestairwell with high velocity and exited through the only open window located inproximity of the first floor.

NIST (National institute of standards and technology) has developed acomputational fluid dynamics (CFD) fire model using large eddy simulation (LES)techniques, called fire dynamics simulator (FDS).

The CFD model requires that the room or building of interest is dividedinto small rectangular control volumes or computational cells. The CFD model computesthe density, velocity, temperature, pressure and species concentration of the gas in eachcell based on the conservation laws of mass, momentum, and energy to model themovement of fire gases. FDS utilizes material properties of the furnishings, walls,floors, and ceilings to simulate fire spread. A complete description of the FDS model isgiven in reference [1]. FDS requires as inputs the geometry of the building, thecomputational cell size, the location of the ignition source, the ignition source, thermalproperties of walls, furnishings and the size, location, and timing of vent openings to theoutside which critically influence fire growth and spread. The timing of the ventopenings, used in the simulation, are based on an approximate timeline of the firefighting activities and on a real time video taken by an amateur. The floor plan of thesecond floor of the townhouse and of the stairwell is shown in Figure 8. The placementand size of the interior walls, doorways, and windows were taken from the dimensionedfloor plans drawn by personnel of the Fire Brigade.

As in the fire incident, the bedroom window and door were kept closed

during the simulation, till the firefighters opened them. The front window on the secondfloor was kept closed while the one located on the first floor, where the backdraft wasvented out (see Figure 1), remained opened during the entire simulation. For the FDSsimulation, a specified heat flux from the wall adjacent to the wardrobe was used tostart the fire growth as the ignition source. Starting the simulation with a flamingignition enabled fire development to be modeled within a reasonable computationaltime. The actual fire may have taken several hours to develop to the flaming stage, if


35

4 MODEL RESULTS


8/12

eventually reached. As the simulated fire spreads from the ignition source, and then toother items in the room, it depletes its supply of oxygen for combustion. When a fireoccurs in a closed room where the only ventilation is due to leakage, it can becomelimited by the available oxygen and produce large amounts of unburned fuel. If theleakage rate is low enough the fire may enter a smoldering stage. Temperatures withinthe bedroom has been estimated much lower than flashover temperatures butsignificantly higher than the ambient. Upon venting, a gravity current carries fresh airinto the compartment. This air mixes with the excess pyrolyzates producing a

flammable pre-mixed gas which can be ignited by a flame or a glowing ember,generating a flame front moving through the compartment toward a vent. This entireprocess: the accumulation of unburned gaseous fuel, the propagation of an oxygen richgravity current creating a mixed region and carrying it to the ignition source, theignition and propagation of an eventually turbulent deflagration vented out, altogetherconstitutes a backdraft [2],[3].

The FDS calculations supported the hypothesis that unburned fuel andCO accumulated in the bedroom, resulting in a backdraft after few minutes of venting


36

Figure 8 : 2nd floor plan view


9/12

the bedroom. Reported conditions such as smoke accumulation in the second floor andthe exotic propagation of the deflagration downward the stairway were reproduced bythe model (Figure 10). Some assumptions were necessary in performing thesecalculations which may have an impact on the models predictions. The results aresensitive to the volume of the apartment and to the size and locations of ventilationopenings. All these elements were known by actual measurements taken by the firedepartment during their investigation and by witness report and a real time amateurvideo. It was reported that the bedroom door and window were closed, up to firefightersarrival. So the assumption of no additional leakage was justified. The combustion waspredominately ventilation controlled, making the results insensitive to fuel loadingand the specific burning characteristics of the fuel. The generation rate of unburnedfuel and CO in poor ventilation conditions should be affected by energy feedback fromthe environment and any flames present during the time of ventilation controlledcombustion. The FDS model does not contain such a self-consistent combustion model,so the quantity of unburned fuel and CO production has been estimated and subject to


37

Figure 9 : Perspective view of townhouse.


10/12


11/12

and are indeed necessary to support the production of relatively dense unburned fuel,prior to cold air mixing, necessary to allow downward flame propagation from second floorto the first floor window, were the deflagration was vented out.

The fire service community has long recognized the hazards associated with

backdrafts. Typically firefighters are involved in initial search and rescue or suppressionoperations when the backdraft occurs. Current tactics for reducing the backdraft hazardsare to vent the structure prior to entry. However, the ventilation process is often a secondpriority to the rescue operation. Indeed, unless it is restricted to roof venting, ventilationmay facilitate rather than prevent a backdraft. Even if neither the occupant nor thefirefighters get seriously injured, it is fundamental to analyze the incident to increase theoverall consciousness of safety culture and avoid the risk that valuable information get


39

5 LESSONS LEARNED

Figure 11 : Temperature profile inside thebedroom (C) during backdraft.


12/12

lost unreported as if no one had been injured. It has also pointed out the benefits of theuse of modern computer fire modeling in the reconstruction of fire incidents tounderstand critical factors for mitigating their impacts.

Alberto Tinaburri Direttore antincendi. Direzione centrale per la Prevenzione e la sicurezza tecnicaMassimo Mazzaro Direttore antincendi. Direzione centrale per la Prevenzione e la sicurezza tecnica

[1] Mc Grattan, K.B., Baum, H.R., Rehm, R.G., Hamins, A. & Forney, G.P. , Fire DynamicsSimulator Technical Reference Guide, NIST Special Publication 1018, Nat. Inst. Stand. Tech.,Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2004.

[2] Fleischmann, C.M. , Backdraft phenomena, NIST-GCR-94-646, Nat. Inst. Stand. Tech.,Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1994.

[3] Fleischmann, C.M., Pagni, P.J. & Williamson, R.B. , Quantitative backdraft experiments.Proceedings of the International Association for Fire Safety Science 4th International Symposium,July 13-17, 1994, Ottawa, Canada, IAFSS, Boston, MA, USA, T. Kashiwagi, ed., pp. 337-348, 1994


40

REFERENCES

modeling a real backdraft indcident fire

Documents