mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

29
Elaine B. Coleman, Ph. D, Resolve Market Research & Dean Wiltse, Thumbspeak Towards an Understanding of Smartphones as a Survey Platform

Upload: merlien-institute

Post on 02-Jul-2015

546 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data qualityElaine B. Coleman - Co-Founder & Chief Research Officer - Resolve Market Research Dean Wiltse - Founder & President – ThumbspeakExamining how technology-driven data applications have become viable options for ascertaining consumer feedback. Determining the implications for mobile applications for delivering data quality to brands. How to motivate consumers to respond quickly to branded information through channel novelty.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Elaine B. Coleman, Ph. D, Resolve Market Research & Dean Wiltse, Thumbspeak

Towards an Understanding of Smartphones as a Survey Platform

Page 2: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Lead Biographies Elaine Is Chief Research Officer and Co-Founder of Resolve Market Research, a leading global research consultancy with unique insight into how technologies and digital media transform consumers and audiences alike. Elaine holds a Ph.D. in Cognitive Science from the University of Toronto and was awarded a McDonnell Post-Doctoral Fellowship which was held at UC Berkeley. Coleman has been an executive of consumer research and product design for over 15 years. Her expertise in designing actionable research has attracted clients from wireless, games, technology, sports marketing and home entertainment.

Dean Wiltse is a market visionary who has pioneered multiple game-changing products and services including Mobile Relationship Marketing and Online Communities. Dean is the founder and President of Thumbspeak LLC and was the former CEO of Greenfield Online. Thumbspeak LLC focuses exclusively on leveraging smart phone technology to create a disruptive approach to gathering data for customer feedback and marketing research while encouraging advocacy and building loyalty. After being hired as CEO of Greenfield Online in 2001, he immediately recognized an opportunity to transform the business model. Under Dean’s leadership, Greenfield completed a successful IPO in 2004, a secondary offering later that same year and the purchase of Ciao in 2005, which led to the eventual sale of the company to Microsoft in 2008. In 2005, he was nominated for Ernst & Young’s ‘Entrepreneur of the Year’ award and Research Magazine’s ‘Marketing Industry CEO of the Year’ honor. Dean is the author of – ‘Weapons of Mass Collaboration: How to Use Online Communities to Drive Competitive Advantage’.

Page 3: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

How does mobile compare?

Page 4: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Mobile n=500 iPhone

and Tablet Owners

Online n=366 iPhone

and Tablet Owners

Panel 1 Panel 2

Survey Topic

Tablets

Sample N=1480

Sample N=1000

Page 5: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Group Base Description

Online platform N=366 Those who completed the survey from an online,

computer platform

Mobile platform N=500 Those who completed the survey using their mobile

device via the Thumbspeak Application

Total Sample N=866 US Tablet owners and users

The margin of error for the full sample is +/- 4%, higher for subgroups.

The study was executed via an online and mobile survey from (April 13 – April 28, 2011) among a national US sample of 866 iPhone and Tablet Owners

Controlled for: Identical questions and stubs, fieldwork period, gender breakout, median age and age groups, business and personal tablet usage, base sizes with the mobile sample were randomly selected.

Page 6: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Comparing the Experiences

Mobile Online

Page 7: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Mode Comparisons…

Page 8: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

19%

27% 48%

6%

Mobile Platform

17%

34%

46%

3%

Online Platform

More

Fewer

No change

Not sure

N=366 N=500

Q9: Are you downloading more or fewer apps on your smartphone now that you are using your tablet device? BASE: N=866

Are you downloading more or fewer apps on your smartphone now that you are using your

tablet device?

Page 9: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

For the next tablet device you purchase, what size tablet would you most prefer?

9%

10%

67%

7%

7%

15%

13%

58%

9%

5%

Not sure

Small enough to fit in my back pocket (i.e., 7inches)

Small enough to fit in my purse or briefcase(i.e., 10 inches)

The same size as my laptop (i.e., 15 inches)

The largest size possible (i.e., 16 inches ormore)

MobilePlatform

OnlinePlatform

348

500

Q5: For the next tablet device you purchase, what size tablet would you most prefer? BASE: N=866

Page 10: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Content is now accessible across multiple devices (smartphone, tablet, PC, laptop, TV set, etc.). Which

devices do you use to watch your favorite TV and movie programming?

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

OnlinePlatform

MobilePlatform

348

500

Q16: Content is now accessible across multiple devices (smartphone, tablet, PC, laptop, TV set, etc.). Which devices do you use to watch your favorite TV and movie programming? Base: N=848

Page 11: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Do you pay attention to advertisements while using

your tablet device?

32%

68%

33%

67%

Yes No

Q14: Do you pay attention to advertisements while using your tablet device? Base: N=866

Have you noticed any advertising while you are

using applications?

55%

45%

73%

27%

Yes No

Mobile Platform

Online Platform

366

500

Page 12: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Where do you use your tablet device at work?

Q7: Where do you use your tablet device at work? Base: N=866

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

At my desk In meetings Duringpresentations

Businesslunches

Onconference

calls

Other I don't usemy tablet at

theworkplace

Online Platform Mobile Platform

348 500

Page 13: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Research Operations Comparisons

Page 14: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Completion Rates

0100200300400500600700800900

10004

/13

/20

11

4/1

4/2

01

1

4/1

5/2

01

1

4/1

6/2

01

1

4/1

7/2

01

1

4/1

8/2

01

1

4/1

9/2

01

1

4/2

0/2

01

1

4/2

1/2

01

1

4/2

2/2

01

1

4/2

3/2

01

1

4/2

4/2

01

1

4/2

5/2

01

1

4/2

6/2

01

1

4/2

7/2

01

1

Qu

alif

ied

Co

mp

lete

s

Date

Mobile Online

Full Point Full

Point

Page 15: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Response Rates

43%

24%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Response Rate

Mobile Online

Page 16: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

How can we make the mobile survey platform experience actionable for our clients?

Page 17: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Mobile Surveys or Polls

Polls work Great!

But who wants to answer a 40 question survey on their phone?

How can we extract valid and reliable samples from mobile?

Page 18: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Innovate on the Sampling Structures

That require “Big Data” Managing

and analyzing large volumes of data in real-time

Page 19: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Age: 21 Ethnicity: Caucasian Environment: Lives at home Occupation: University Student on a scholarship Online Interests: Avid Pandora User Activity: Sends 50 texts per day Hobbies: Plays video games 2 hours per day Entertainment: Cord Cutter who watches HULU plus on a laptop at least 8+ hours per week

Close Approximate Match This is John…. This is Jon…. This is Johnny….

Commonalities across all of our Johns

Page 20: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

I have a survey that is 40 questions long that we plan to distribute via

mobile.

John 1

John 2 -Next Approximate Match

John 3 – Next Approximate Match

Answers the first module of 10 questions then stops.

Answers the second 10 question module then

stops.

And so forth until the John Group has completed 4

modules of 10 questions

Media Consumption

Marital Status

Occupation

City, State

Age, Gender, Ethnicity

Online Behaviors

Matching Variables

Page 21: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Expect all Johns to answer in the same approximate way

Each individual’s responses are aggregated with others in their cohort and represent a more robust set of opinions of one type respondent.

Aggregated as a cohort group –with little

variance.

Page 22: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Aggregate Responses

John

Kari

Victor

This enables clients to distribute a 25 minute mobile questionnaire with the contextual benefits of a mobile experience.

Page 23: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Historically, with every new technology or research method comes an “effect” that needs to be understood separately from

its novelty

Page 24: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Historical Effects Face-to-Face:

The “Hawthorne Effect” “Demand or Pleasing Effect”

“Respondents take on the goal of pleasing the experimenter.”

Page 25: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Historical Effects Online:

The “Anonymity Effect” “The Power of Invisibility”

“There is a tendency to be more disparaging, inflammatory or honest.”

Page 26: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Historical Effects Mobile:

The “________ Effect”

Page 27: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

4 Calls to Action

• Conduct more studies to “cognitively unpack” the Mobile Effect

• Develop new types of sampling methodologies make mobile actionable for business and product

• Develop elegant, easy mobile UI’s for end user experiences

• Think about “Big Data” and develop real-time data processing applications for research

Page 29: Mobile versus online: modality considerations for data quality

Presented at:

Market Research in the Mobile World 2nd International Conference | July 19 & 20, 2011 Atlanta

Organized by: Thank you to sponsors:

LinkedIn Group: Mobile MR

Upcoming Merlien Events: Merlien.org GreenBook Directory: GreenBook.org Market Research Blog: GreenBookBlog.org New Qual Blog & Directory: NewQualitative.org

Get Inspired. Stay Informed. Cut Through the Clutter. Sign up for our free email newsletter