mnpals needs assessment survey results
DESCRIPTION
assess needs. evaluate. evaluate. MnPALS Needs Assessment Survey Results. use. develop. 2009. implement. Who responded? … by library t ype. Who responded? … by position. Results …module importance. Results …module importance. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Who responded? …by library type
Community Colleges
Consolidated Colleges
Technical Colleges
Private Colleges
Public Universities
State Agencies
Special
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
No. Institutions No. Responses
Who responded? …by position
Administration
Reference
Cataloging
Serials
Acquisitions
Circulation
Interlibrary Loan
Archives
Systems
Other
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Results …module importance
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
Total0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
OPACCatCircILL
Results …module importance
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
Total0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
AcqSerBookingReservesInventory
Results …OPAC functionality (Q14)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All/Almost all Some Does not
Results …cataloging functionality (Q17)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All/Almost all Some Does not
Results …circulation functionality (Q18)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All/Almost all Some Does not
Results …ILL functionality (Q19)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All/Almost all Some Does not
Results …acquisitions functionality (Q15)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All/Almost all Some Does not
Results …serials functionality (Q16)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All/Almost all Some Does not
Results …booking functionality (Q20)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All/Almost all Some Does not
Results …reserves functionality (Q21)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All/Almost all Some Does not
Results …inventory functionality (Q13)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All/Almost all Some Does not
Results …non-MARC (Q24)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Need Moderate No
Results …non-OCLC MARC (Q25)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Need Moderate No
Results …batch MARC (Q27)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Need Moderate No
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Need Moderate No
Results …local OPAC customization (Q26)
Results …custom SQL reports (Q28)
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Need Moderate No
Results …open source ILS
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate Weak/NoSeries3
Results …WorldCat Local ILS
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate Weak/NoSeries3
Results …ExLibris URM
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate Weak/NoSeries3
Results …MnPALS Plus enhancements
Q64: Spellc
heck
Q65: Reader's
Advisory
(more lik
e)
Q66: Reader's
Advisory
(users
who)
Q67: Book Reviews
Q68: Author B
iographies
Q69: Tags/F
olksonomies
Q70: Socia
l Bookmarks
Q71: Mobile
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Strong Moderate No
Results …federated search
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …open linking
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …proxy server
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …local directory authentication
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …electronic resource mgmt
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …collection analysis tool
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …archives management
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …e-reserves management
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …service statistics mgmt
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …blog/wiki hosting
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …institutional repository
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …ETD repository
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …library guides mgmt
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …citation mgmt
2-Yr (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong Moderate None
Results …skills to support ILS
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong agree Agree Somewhat agree Disagree
Results …time to support ILS
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong agree Agree Somewhat agree Disagree
Results …dependency upon PALS
2-Years (all) 4-Yr Private 4-Yr Public Special/Agency
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong agree Agree Somewhat agree Disagree
assess needsevaluate
develo
p
implement
evalu
ate
use
2009 NATF members
Keith Ewing, St. Cloud State UniversityJoe Jackson, Winona State UniversitySarah Quimby, Minnesota Historical SocietyDavid Schmidtke, Legislative Reference LibraryBecky Schwartzkopf, Minnesota State University, MankatoLeAnn Suchy, College of St. Benedict/St. John’s University
For the MnPALS Executive Committee:Orrin Ausen, Bethany Lutheran CollegePaul Dahl, Minnesota Department of Health