mmc a study on preview pane visibility

Upload: guillaume-kol

Post on 10-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    1/13

    Benjamin S. Curtis

    Digital Strategist

    A Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    2008 - 2009 MicroMass Communications, Inc.

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    2/13

    2

    1.0 Overview 3

    2.0 Testing Criteria 3

    3.0 Preview Pane Sizes 4

    3.1 Yahoo Webmail 4

    3.2 Yahoo Classic Webmail 4

    3.3 Windows Live Webmail 5

    3.3.1 Windows Live Bottom/Horizontal Preview Pane 5

    3.3.2 Windows Live Right/Vertical Preview Pane 6

    3.4 Hotmail Classic Webmail 6

    3.5 AOL Desktop Client 7

    3.6 AOL Webmail 7

    3.6.1 AOL Webmail In Window 8

    3.7 Outlook 2003 8

    3.7.1 Outlook 2003 Bottom/Horizontal Preview Pane 9

    3.8 Outlook 2007 9

    3.8.1 Outlook 2007 Bottom/Horizontal Preview Pane 10

    3.9 Combined Results 10

    4.0 Recommendations 11

    5.0 Additional Questions 11

    5.1 I thought vertical preview panes were on the rise? 11

    5.2 What about Gmail? 12 5.3 What does the uture hold? 12

    5.4 How can I make sure consumers receive my e-mails? 12

    About the Author 13

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    3/13

    2008 - 2009 MicroMass Communications, Inc.

    1.0 OverviewThere is a lot o talk in the eMarketing world about

    how consumers view their e-mails, especially in

    preview panes. Should your company design or

    vertical preview panes or horizontal? Should you

    worry about how an e-mail will look without im-

    ages? Where is the market going?

    The problem with most common answers or

    these questions is that there is little actual data

    to support the variability o e-mail readers. The

    standard responses lack oundation or statistical

    data necessary to glean the answer. The most

    basic question that should come beore any other

    is, How much o my e-mail can consumers see

    without scrolling?

    Answering this basic question should uel decisions

    or any o the prior questions. Beore determining a

    layout or an e-mail, it is important to understand

    what the exact visible space in each preview pane

    is. Or rather, what the consumer will see rst.

    The purpose o this document is to create a

    solid, act-based oundation rom which your

    organization can work. Putting aside the common

    debates about the physical limitations o many

    e-mail readers, we have put the most popular

    readers on the market to the test.

    We will show you the deault and optional

    preview pane views or each o the most popular

    mail readers, along with the specifc sizing and

    resolutions with which your marketing and design

    teams have to work. In addition, we will summarize

    a set o recommendations on how to best build an

    e-mail that will work with all o them.

    2.0 Testing Criteria

    We chose the ollowing e-mail readers based on a

    MicroMass Communications-sponsored study o

    over 179,000 consumers o large Pharmaceutical

    Marketing campaigns, and the most common e-mail

    domains rom them.1 Despite its more common

    use in the B-to-B market, we then added Microsot

    Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2007 or good measure.

    This gives the study another mail reader contain-

    ing vertical preview panes. The e-mail readers

    consisted o:

    Yahoo Webmail: 31%

    Hotmail Webmail: 12%

    AOL: 12%2

    Outlook 2003: Unknown3

    Outlook 2007: Unknown3

    * Percentages dene the percentage o the 179,000 plus

    consumers who belonged to that category.

    We conducted these tests in Internet Explorer

    6, which contains a 22.3% marketshare.4 Wechose IE6 due to the average size o its viewable

    window, minus the deault toolbars. We then

    used a resolution o 1024x768, which consists

    o 48% o users.5 These selections were made

    to ensure that we came as close to the average

    consumers computer setup as possible, without

    overcomplicating the test.

    All tests, other than those done with Outlook

    2003, were completed without adjusting the

    deault size o any preview panes. Outlook2003 was an exception due to its seemingly

    random placement o preview pane sizes ater

    installation. However, these variations were

    slight and would not have aected the results o

    the study.

    3

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    4/13

    4

    3.0 Preview Pane SizesThe ollowing sections will take you through the

    dierent e-mail readers involved in this test.

    3.1 Yahoo WebmailYahoo Webmails deault mail view is to display

    your list o e-mails on top, with a preview pane

    below your messages. This is Yahoos deault

    methodology, and they oer no alternatives.

    3.2 Yahoo Classic Webmail

    Users have the option o downgrading to Yahoo

    Classic. Yahoo Classics deault mail view is to display

    your list o e-mails with no preview pane. When

    clicking on a message, the message is displayed inthe current window. This is Yahoo Classics deault

    methodology, and they oer no alternatives. Whats

    interesting about Yahoo Classic is that it is the only

    mail reader in this analysis that does not strip images

    by deault.

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 622x192 (without

    images), 622x255 (with images)

    Deault Preview Pane Placement: Bottom

    Other Preview Options : None

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 797x84 (with images)

    Other Viewable Areas: None

    Deault Preview Pane Placement: No Preview

    Other Preview Options : None

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    5/13

    5

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 785x210 (without

    images), 785x238 (with images)

    Deault Preview Pane Placement: No Preview

    Other Preview Options : Bottom, Right

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 797x3 (without

    images), 797x23 (with images)

    2008 - 2009 MicroMass Communications, Inc.

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    3.3.1 Windows Live Bottom/Horizontal

    Preview Pane

    This preview pane is an alternative option the

    user may choose.

    3.3 Windows Live Webmail

    Windows Lives deault mail view is to display your

    list o e-mails with no preview pane. When clicking

    on a message, the message is displayed in the current

    window. This is Windows Lives deault methodology;however, they do oer other preview pane options.

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    6/13

    6

    3.3.2 Windows Live Right/Vertical

    Preview Pane

    This preview pane is an alternative option the user

    may choose.

    3.4 Hotmail Classic Webmail

    Users o Windows Live have the option o down-

    grading to Hotmail Classic. Hotmail Classics

    deault mail view is to display your list o e-mails

    with no preview pane. When clicking on a message,the message is displayed in the current window.

    This is Hotmail Classics deault methodology, and

    they oer no alternatives.

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 513x171 (without

    images), 513x219 (with images)

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 795x230 (without

    images), 795x260 (with images)

    Deault Preview Pane Placement: No Preview

    Other Preview Options : None

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    7/13

    3.5 AOL Desktop Client

    AOL Desktop Clients deault mail view is to display

    your list o e-mails with no preview pane. When

    clicking on a message, the message is displayed in

    a pop-up window. This is the AOL Desktop Clientsdeault methodology, and they do not oer other

    alternatives. We measured based on a maximized

    window, as this is a common practice or users o

    1024x768 displays.

    3.6 AOL Webmail

    AOL Webmails deault mail view is to display your

    list o e-mails with no preview pane. When clicking

    on a message, the message is displayed in a pop-

    up window that is smaller than the actual screen

    resolution (which was 1024x768 or this analysis).

    This is AOL Webmails deault methodology;

    however, they do oer other alternatives. We

    measured based on a maximized window, as this is

    a common practice or users o 1024x768 displays.

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 907x316 (without

    images), 907x316 (with images)

    Deault Preview Pane Placement: In Window

    Other Preview Options : None

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 687x474 (without

    images), 687x495 (with images)

    7 2008 - 2009 MicroMass Communications, Inc.

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    8/13

    Deault Preview Pane Placement: Pop-up

    Other Preview Options : In Window

    3.6.1 AOL Webmail - In Window

    This view is another display option provided by AOL

    Webmail. It is not a preview pane; it allows the user

    to open the e-mail within the current window, rather

    than popping up a new window.

    3.7 Outlook 2003

    Outlook 2003 is a very common e-mail reader on the

    market. While much more common in the B-to-B

    realm, we elt we should include it despite the

    overwhelming trend toward Webmail readers in

    the Pharmaceutical consumer-based marketplace.

    Unortunately, Outlook 2003s preview pane size

    seems to vary rom installation to installation, so

    we were orced to use what was currently displayed

    on the test system.

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 672x323 (without

    images), 672x348 (with images

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 411x412 (without

    images), 411x461 (with images

    8

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    9/13

    Deault Preview Pane Placement: Right

    Other Preview Options : Bottom, No Preview

    3.7.1 Outlook 2003 Bottom/HorizontalPreview Pane

    This preview pane is an alternative option the user

    may choose. Despite not being the deault or Out-

    look 2003, this seems to be a more commonly used

    view.

    3.8 Outlook 2007

    Outlook 2007 is the newest release o Outlook rom

    Microsot. While similar to Outlook 2003, it handles

    e-mail in a dierent way. Yahoo, Hotmail and AOL

    have all dedicated themselves to making eMarketing

    dicult, but Microsot has raised the bar with its

    latest release. Outlook 2007 now uses Microsot

    Word to parse its e-mails, meaning that while it will

    show images by deault, it will not display even

    the most basic HTML, such as CSS positioning or

    background images. Luckily, like 2003, Outlook 2007

    is a much more common platorm in B-to-B, and

    does not aect our consumer population as much

    as the major webmail readers on the market.

    Deault behavior o not displaying images

    Ater the user tells the reader to display images

    Deault behavior o displaying images,

    and improper parsing o HTML.

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 743x166 (without

    images), 743x232 (with images)

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 564x496 (with

    some images)

    Deault Preview Pane Placement: Right

    Other Preview Options : Bottom, No Preview

    2008 - 2009 MicroMass Communications, Inc. 9

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    10/13

    10

    3.8.1 Outlook 2007 Bottom/Horizontal

    Preview Pane

    This preview pane is an alternative option the user

    may choose. Despite not being the deault or

    Outlook 2007, this seems to be a more commonlyused view.

    RESULTS

    Deault Viewable Area: 781x199 (with

    some images)

    Deault behavior o displaying images,

    and improper parsing o HTML.

    { Combined Results }

    Figure 3.9a

    Reader

    Yahoo Classic

    Windows Live

    Hotmail Classic

    AOL Desktop

    AOL Webmail

    Outlook 2003

    Outlook 2007

    Yahoo

    Deault

    Viewable AreaWith Images

    797x84

    785x210

    795x230

    907x316

    687x474

    411x412

    564x496

    622x192

    Deault

    Viewable AreaWithout Images

    None

    785x238

    795x260

    907x316

    687x495

    411x461

    None

    622x255

    Other Preview

    Options

    None

    Bottom, Right

    None

    None

    None

    Bottom, No Preview

    Bottom, No Preview

    None

    Other Viewable Areas

    None

    797x23 (no images), 797x23 (with images)

    513x171 (no images), 513x219 (with images)

    None

    None

    672x323 (no images), 672x348 (with images)

    743x166 (no images), 743x232 (with images)

    781x199 (with some images)

    None

    Deault PreviewPane Placement

    No Preview

    No Preview

    No Preview

    No Preview

    Pop-up

    Right

    Right

    Bottom

    3.9 Combined Results

    Below is a combined chart o the results rom

    each e-mail reader. The bolded resolutions are

    the resolutions that should be ocused on or a

    pharmaceutical consumer-marketing campaign.

    Outlook 2003 and 2007 are included or comparison

    purposes, but are not bolded due to their

    probable low use in this market versus in B-to-B

    communication. Again, other than with Outlook2003, these tests were all conducted without

    resizing the deault preview panes. See Figure 3.9a.

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    11/13

    11

    We recommend that you not confineyourself completely within these

    numbers, but instead be sure that asignificant enough portion of your CTA

    fits within this area. Use the visiblearea to give your consumer a reason

    to scroll down.

    For making your HTML e-mailsmore reader-friendly, youll have

    to keep in mind what they will look likewhen stripped of all their visual flair.

    Designer education and comprehensivetesting is the key to accomplishing this.

    2008 - 2009 MicroMass Communications, Inc.

    4.0 Recommendations

    From the above preview pane size results, you

    could surmise that designers and strategists should

    structure their e-mails to contain the most relevant

    calls to action within the top 638x86 pixels. This

    would allow your calls to action to be seen in every

    viewable area o the most popular Web mail readers

    deault views.

    Those with vertical preview panes may lose out on

    some o the right-hand inormation, but those users

    seem to be less numerous in this marketplace. I you

    were really concerned with what would be visible

    in every occurrence, you could ocus on the top

    401x86 pixels, or organize your e-mail so that the

    most valuable inormation is on the top let, and thesecond most valuable on the top right.

    platorms above, to ensure high consumer quality

    no matter what reader consumers choose.

    For instance, i you have a $40 o oer in yourConversion program displayed as a callout, be sure

    that enough o that callout is visible in the top let

    638x86 pixels to be identiable. You dont need the

    whole callout, just enough or the consumer to

    be able to comprehend its meaning. For a newsletter,

    ensure that the most valuable parts o your Table

    o Contents are plain text and t within this area.

    These methods will entice the user to display

    the images associated with your e-mail, and

    continue reading.

    Constantly keeping track o how mail readers

    change, and eeding that inormation to designers

    so these problems are covered during the initial

    phases o an e-mail campaign, is important or

    any marketing department or agency. We also

    recommend testing every e-mail produced in the

    5.0 Additional Questions

    There is a lot o talk in the e-Marketing world about

    how consumers view their e-mails, especially in

    preview panes. Should your company design orvertical preview panes or horizontal? Should you

    worry about how an e-mail will look without images?

    Where is the market going?

    5.1 I thought vertical preview panes were

    on the rise?

    As you can see, our recommendations skew

    toward the use o horizontal preview panes. As

    or the debate over designing or vertical preview

    panes or not, consideration o all preview panesis important. However, there is not a driving need

    or the pharmaceuticalor any other consumer-

    driven marketplace to ocus heavily on them.

    There are currently only three clients that support

    this technology:

    Outlook 2003/2007 , which is used primarily in

    the business environment or by proessionals,

    not as requently by consumers

    Thunderbird

    , a Mozilla-based competition orOutlook Express geared toward more tech-savvy

    consumers.

    Windows Live

    And out o these three, only Outlook 2003/07

    deaults to this behavior.

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    12/13

    12

    5.2 What about Gmail?

    We get asked this question all the time. Gmail is a

    very popular webmail reader rom Google. Gmails

    usage is low in the Pharmaceutical consumer

    marketplace, as our study showed only 6% oconsumers were using Gmail. This is great news

    or advertisers. While the idiosyncrasies between

    HTML processing or Yahoo, Windows Live and AOL

    are vast, Gmail takes things to a whole new level

    and post-processes almost everything it receives.

    This makes it very dicult or an agency to create

    an HTML-based e-mail that looks the same in Gmail

    as it does in other mail readers.

    5.3 What does the uture hold?

    From our experience with users, we see an increasingamount o people change the deault setting or

    Outlook 2003/2007 rom the right preview pane

    to the bottom. Is this statistically signicant? O

    course not, but it seems to be a common behavior.

    In addition, most LCD monitors on the market today

    have deault resolutions o 1280x1024, or their

    widescreen variants. Computer manuactures are

    now shipping their machines to match, meaning

    or every new computer purchased, more viewable

    area is attained.

    Reerences1 Statistical analysis was conducted on 179,384 consumers in October o 2008 on marketing campaigns or large-tier Pharmaceu-

    tical companies, spanning multiple indications. Results o this survey show that the ourth place in the list o mail domains was

    less than 7%. Subsequently, any webmail reader other than Yahoo, Hotmail or AOL would be used less than 7% o the time in the

    surveyed campaigns. All participants were recorded as having valid e-mail addresses with no record o a hard bounce. All Yahoo and

    Hotmail percentages assume that all participants use those respective Webmail readers, which is likely the case.

    2 Statistics contain all AOL usage, including both the sotware and Web-based mail reader.3 Even i Outlook 2003 or 2007 was used by every other mail domain surveyed, which is not the case, it could not pertain to more than

    48%, or the remainder, o the audience.

    4 Statistics sourced rom W3Schools (http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) on October 15, 2008.

    5 Statistics sourced rom W3Schools (http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp) on October 15, 2008.

    5.4 How can I make sure consumers receive

    my e-mails?

    The best way to ensure that consumers receive your

    e-mails is to encourage them to add your e-mail

    address to their address book. This can be donewith a simple line o text near the top o your e-mail.

    There are many benets o convincing consumers

    to do this:

    Your e-mails are white-listed and will gostraight to the users inbox

    In most readers, images are displayed by de-ault, making the e-mail more visually appealing

    When images are displayed by deault, open

    rates can be tracked without the user having toclick a display images button

    Keep in mind, regardless o whether your e-mail is

    displayed properly by deault, the two items that

    will convince a user to open an e-mail the most are

    the subject line and a riendly rom address. Stay

    away rom generic subjects, and use that space to

    call out the most marketable part o your e-mail.

  • 8/8/2019 MMC a Study on Preview Pane Visibility

    13/13

    AboutMicroMass Communications, Inc.

    MicroMass personalizes brands. Founded in 1994, MicroMass is a relationship marketing agency

    with unrivalled capabilities in using behavioral science to gain and apply deep consumer

    insights. The companys approach is ounded on the belie that understanding the critical

    actors that infuence individual behavior and creating a dialogue that addresses those actors

    is the best way o building enduring relationships between customers and brands.

    Unlike traditional agencies that are siloed or structured by discipline, MicroMass brings

    together under one roo the expertise and services or building sophisticated, multi-channel

    programs that span the ull relationship marketing continuum. We are one teamintegrated

    strategically, but able to apply specic nuances depending on the channel we believe will be

    most benecial or the brand and its customer.

    Headquartered in Cary, N.C., with a second oce in Morristown, N.J., MicroMass is one o the

    astest growing agencies in its eld.

    For additional inormation on MicroMass, visit www.micromass.com.

    About the Author

    Benjamin S. Curtis,Digital Strategist

    Benjamin Curtis has an extensive technical background ranging many markets, and has worked

    in the Internet technologies sector or over 12 years. Ben joined MicroMass Communications, a

    pharmaceutical marketing agency, in 2000 and is currently employed as a Digital Strategist. Prior

    to this role, Ben led the agencys Web Services group, where he was instrumental in planning,

    implementing and managing numerous brand-marketing campaigns.

    For more inormation on how MicroMass Communications can help you with your

    eMarketing needs, please contact Benjamin S. Curtis at [email protected] , or visit

    www.micromass.com.