Spring 2008

Finding Your Balance pg 14 The Future of Food pg 18

SPRI

NG

200

8

W

ILLI

AM

MIT

CHEL

L CO

LLEG

E O

F LA

W M

AG

AZI

NE

on lawWANTED:

First-Year Associate

with Experience

Mitchell on Law

Mitchell on Law

Volume 25, No.2Published by the Office of Institutional Advancement, William Mitchell College of Law875 Summit Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55105-3076(651) 290-6370 fax: (651) 290-7502magazine@wmitchell.eduwww.wmitchell.edu/alumni

President and DeanEric S. Janus

Chair, Board of TrusteesGregory J. Stenmoe ’81

Board of Trustees

Mary Cullen Yeager ’89, vice chair; Judge Elizabeth H. Martin ’80,

secretary; James C. Melville ’90, treasurer; Louis L. Ainsworth ’77;

Lynn M. Anderson ’80; Lawrence T. Bell ’79; Stephen R. Bergerson

’74; Stephen B. Bonner ’72; Patricia Ann Burke ’78; Mary C. Cade

’77; Jeffrey P. Cairns ’81; Richard R. Crowl ’76; Mary Lou Dasburg;

Michelle A. Hatcher ’98; Penny A. Hunt ’77; Stephen R. Lewis Jr.;

David M. Lilly Jr.; Ben I. Omorogbe ’95; Kathleen Flynn Peterson

’81; Lewis A. Remele Jr.; Peter M. Reyes Jr. ’97; William R. Sieben

’77; Thomas W. Tinkham; Eric C. Tostrud ’90; William A. Van

Brunt; Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright; Donald F. Zibell ’62; Richard

F. Ziegler

Alumni Association PresidentMichelle A. Hatcher ’98

Alumni Association Board of Directors

Mark A. Metz ’97, vice president; Jocelyn L. Knoll ’92, secretary/

treasurer; Thomas C. Baxter ’94 ; Jennifer F. Beck Brown ’03;

Aaron A. Dean ’94; John M. Degnan ’76; Dyan J. Ebert ’93; Kate A.

Golden ’99; Mark A. Hallberg ’79; Judge Jill Flaskamp Halbrooks

’85; Juan G. Hoyos ‘92; Imani S. Jaafar Mohammad ’04; Barbara

J. Klas ’91; William M. Orth ’80; Judge George T. Stephenson ’85;

Robert G. Suk ’70; Kay E. Tuveson ’87; Alan R. Vanasek ’69; Piper

K. Webb ’97; Sylvia I. Zinn ’84

EditorsWendy BurtMary McGlynn Grant

Class Notes EditorJulie Husmoe

WritingLisa HardenAmy LindgrenMeleah MaynardErin Peterson

Art DirectionPamela Belding

Graphic DesignPamela BeldingMelinda Bianchet

PhotographersRaoul BenavidesJonathan ChapmanTim RummelhoffMoses Shirai

IllustratorKeith Skeen

Editor’s NoteSpring is a time of new beginnings, and this season our magazine features several new beginnings for our faculty, alumni, and school. The name Janus comes from the ancient Roman god of doorways, beginnings, and the rising and setting of the sun. And so Mitchell enters a new season in its history with Dean Eric S. Janus’ official installation as the law school’s 24th president. A note from Dean Janus reflecting on this new beginning is found on page 32. Recently, Mitchell embarked on extensive alumni research to enhance our relationship with you. A summary of the results is found on page 4. This issue shows off Mitchell’s strengths. We’ve been pioneering the practical aspects of legal education for decades, but what are we doing to continue to be pioneers into the future? Several innovative programs and skills courses are highlighted in “Wanted: First-Year Associate with Experience.” You eat, right? You’ll want to read “The Future of Food,” about Professor Donna Byrne who is plowing new ground in food and agricultural law. A recent CLE raised the subject of work-life balance, and that got us wondering about whether the discussion that started in the ’80s has changed. See what you think after reading “Finding Your Balance” on page 14. Finally, there’s a new beginning for alumnus Eric Magnuson ’76 who becomes chief justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court in June. All are welcome on Tuesday, June 24, at a reception in his honor. See page 26 for more details.

Happy summer!

Wendy Burtmagazine@wmitchell.edu

1

Table of Contents

1022

2

8

18

2

8

10

13

14

18

22

4

21

24

32

13

14

10

Cover illustrationby Keith Skeen

Spring 2008 Read the magazine online @ www.wmitchell.edu/alumni

Features and Profiles

Optimism, Opportunities, and Open Doors:John Stanoch ‘85By Erin PetersonThe president of Qwest’s Minnesota operations has an open-door policy: when he sees one, he walks through. It’s led him from a judge’s chamber to the state Capitol to a Fortune 500 company.

Dedicated to Public Service: Carol Washington 1LBy Lisa HardenA natural advocate, this Mitchell student has already gained considerable experience in policy and government.

Wanted: First-Year Associate with ExperienceBy Erin PetersonSeveral new innovative programs are giving Mitchell students an edge when they start working and fi rm recruiters what they’re looking for when hiring.

Two Supreme Court Chief Justices Support a Working StudentBy Lisa HardenNick Mazzocco, a part-time Mitchell 1L student and full-time construction project manager, is the fi rst recipient of the Magnuson Amdahl Working Student Scholarship.

Finding Your BalanceBy Amy LindgrenWith work and life seamlessly integrated—thanks largely to technology—everyone’s happy, right? Apparently not. The word “balance” is making a comeback. This time around, men are joining the discussion, and the conversation is about more than child care.

The Future of FoodBy Meleah MaynardProfessor Donna Byrne is preparing her students to tackle food law’s new frontier.

Working Where She’s Needed: Jessie Nicholson ‘85By Lisa HardenJessie Nicholson ’85 has devoted a legal career to representing low-income people.

Departments

News

Gratitude

Class Notes

To the Point—Thoughts from Dean Janus

Mitchell on Law2

John Stanoch ’85 has an open-door policy: when he

sees one, he walks through. It’s led him from a judge’s

chamber to the State Capitol to a presidential post at a

Fortune 500 company.

John Stanoch ’85 has an

Optimism, Opportunities, and Open Doors

3Spring 2008

rom his 21st fl oor offi ce at Qwest, John Stanoch ’85 has a spectacular view of downtown Minneapolis, but on many

warm summer afternoons, he prefers to be a few blocks east in the confi nes of the Metrodome, where the downtown view is replaced by an off-white fi berglass dome. Every year, he splits season tickets with a couple of buddies so he can watch the Minnesota Twins in action. Stanoch vacations in Fort Myers, Fla., to watch the squad in spring training, and every year he and his son travel around the country to watch games in venues like Yankee Stadium, Wrigley Field, and Fenway Park. He’s perfectly content with his annual baseball rituals, but he admits he can’t wait until April 2010, when the Twins will welcome fans to a brand new ballpark. “When the team fi nally has an outdoor stadium, I can hardly wait to spend a Sunday afternoon watching baseball outside,” he says. In some ways that view perfectly encapsulates the philosophy that has driven his entire career. As happy as he is at any given point, he’s always confi dent that there’s an even better opportunity just on the horizon.

A Broad Base From the very beginning, Stanoch juggled his interests in governmental and corporate work. Before heading to William Mitchell, he spent a year at the University of Minnesota’s Humphrey Institute for Public Affairs. While at Mitchell, Stanoch started lobbying on behalf of the city of Minneapolis—experience that led to more government relations work. He took a job with a private fi rm shortly after graduating, but left a couple years later to run his own government relations practice. By the late 1980s, he’d built a strong circle of political connections, and in 1990, then-Gov. Rudy Perpich asked him to chair his re-election campaign. Perpich lost the race, but before he left offi ce, he offered Stanoch a position as a district court judge in Hennepin County, which Stanoch accepted. Hennepin County Chief Judge Lucy Wieland ’82, who worked with Stanoch during his tenure at the district court, says he was both skilled and personable, a perfect combination for the role. “John

is one of the most congenial and even-tempered people I know,” she says. “He likes people, and people know that. As a result, they’re drawn to him.” Stanoch took on his share of high-profi le cases as a judge, but he says that the ones that meant the most to him happened when he was working in juvenile court between 1995 and 1998. Frequent monitoring meant that he often saw kids several times throughout their probation, and he watched as they changed and improved their lives. He remembers one boy who drew him a picture of Bugs Bunny to thank him—Stanoch put it on his door and kept it for the rest of his time on the bench. “That’s part of the reason the juvenile court exists as a rehabilitation—rather than a punishment—court. Young people can make mistakes, but they can also turn themselves around.” Stanoch enjoyed the job, and by 1998, he’d been elected for a second full term. But when state Attorney General Mike Hatch offered him a post as chief deputy attorney general, he says he couldn’t pass it up.

At the state attorney general’s offi ce, Stanoch supervised more than 200 attorneys and oversaw civil litigation as well as the work of the criminal division. While it looked like a big move up to most, he admits that it caused a bit of consternation for his father. “I think he really wondered if something was wrong with me,” he says. “He couldn’t understand why I would want to stop being a judge.” Stanoch reassured his father that everything would work out for the best. Stanoch’s optimism was well-placed. In his new job, his work and demeanor continued to impress the state’s top movers and shakers. When Qwest, the telecommunications company, quite literally came calling a couple years later to see if he was interested in becoming president of the company’s Minnesota operations, he jumped at the chance. The new position

in business was both a step forward and a nod to his past. “It was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity,” he enthuses. “It was a chance to use the experience I had in dealing with the government, dealing with regulators, dealing with the legal system, and dealing with the media.”

New Opportunities, New Challenges Stanoch took the reins at a time of signifi cant fl ux in the industry—Ma Bell has been transformed into an industry that’s about more than just phones. “The rate of transformation has been enormous,” Stanoch says. “Many people are moving away from having a landline phone, and there’s been huge growth in the Internet and broadband connections. The scope of what we do has expanded tremendously, and it’s a much more competitive environment.” Wieland says though it might not have been a traditional career move, it was one for which Stanoch was well suited. “He’s someone who likes a challenge. But he’s also someone who’s a strategic thinker. He’s got natural leadership ability, and he builds consensus,” she says. Stanoch is also someone who believes there’s more to life than his career. You might fi nd him mentoring students through the Minnesota Business Partnership or chairing a Hennepin County task force that focuses on improving graduation rates. He's also serving on Mitchell's National Security Forum advisory board. “I believe you have an obligation to give back to your community and to try to make it a better place to live and work,” he says. Stanoch is entering his eighth year as president of the Minnesota operations at Qwest. He’s content with his role, but he also acknowledges that he’s kept his law license active. At fi rst, it was a concession he made to his father when he took the job at Qwest. But now he says he can see that he might eventually move back to law. You might expect that, though. Because throughout his career, he’s proven that if you keep your options open, opportunity just might knock.

Erin Peterson is a Minneapolis-based freelance writer.

Alumni Profile

By Erin Peterson

Optimism, Opporand Open

“I believe you have an obligation to give back to your community

and to try to make it a better place to live and work.”

Phot

o by

Rao

ul B

enav

ides

Mitchell on Law

60%

55%

55%

39%

Here’s what you said:Generally, there is good satisfaction among alumni. In fact, 67% of those surveyed are satisfi ed overall with their law school experience. Among the fi ndings:

Alumni believe Mitchell graduates are better able to hit the ground running and make an immediate contribution in their new jobs.

Alumni view William Mitchell as having a strong reputation and one focused on practical legal education.

Three-quarters would recommend Mitchell to prospective students

65% of alumni felt prepared to succeed in their career.

When asked what words best describe William Mitchell, 78% of you said “practical wisdom.”

We asked about your level of support for Mitchell’s college-wide strategies. Here’s what you ranked most important:

1. Practical and relevant legal education 75%

2. Access for non-traditional students 71%

3. Keeping Mitchell affordable 55%

4. Successful job placement 55%

5. Competitive with other Minnesota law schools 50%

In addition, we found that we have room to improve: 45% of alumni surveyed said they would like to be more connected to Mitchell. 71% said they felt somewhat informed, and 18% said they felt very informed about what's going on at Mitchell. They also agreed that the school could increase communication to alumni through the Web, print communications, and email.

Specifi cally, alumni are looking to Mitchell for:

Educational opportunities

Opportunities to help students

Career development help while students at Mitchell

Opportunities to connect with fellow alumni

What it means going forward"Our network of 10,000 alumni is one of our strongest assets,” said President and Dean Eric S. Janus, “and I am committed to strengthening our alumni engagement and career development efforts. In addition, we’re testing webcasting of our CLEs to reach more alumni. A strong alumni relations program will not happen overnight, but we are already taking steps to enhance what we are doing.”

The research, conducted by an outside research fi rm, included phone surveys and focus groups with a broad cross-section of alumni, and will be conducted again in three years. We also looked at differences between age groups, including priorities of Baby Boomers (born 1946-64), Generation X (1965-82), and Generation Y (1983-97).

Thank you to Mitchell alumni who participated in our research. If you would like to contribute your thoughts on William Mitchell’s alumni relations program, email magazine@wmitchell.edu.

4

Letting Us Know What You ThinkIn an effort to help guide strategic planning efforts for the school and enhance the alumni relations program, William Mitchell recently asked alumni for your opinions about the school’s reputation, your relationship with the school, what we do well, and where we can improve.

ALUMNI OPINIONS

5Spring 2008 Read more news online @ www.wmitchell.edu/alumni

Mitchell News

In the News

"We know that statistically, seniors are at enormous risk for fraud. It’s foolish to ignore that. But there's also a huge dilemma in determining when someone

is just being eccentric, versus someone who is a victim of undue influence." Professor Kim Dayton on senior citizens filing lawsuits alleging they were victims of

business fraud. The New York Times, Dec. 24, 2007

"We should let the world know that we are going to not be doing this willy-nilly, but that the program is important. When you have 100, 150 people who have been rendered, you can't just say we're going to have a mistake or two." Professor A. John Radsan in the April 12 News & Observer as part of a panel discussion at Duke University in North Carolina on the practice of extraordinary rendition in which terrorism suspects are moved from one country to another for interrogation.

"I'm pretty sure that at the end of the day, we won't have bars calling themselves street theaters. How does that go: What's in a name? That which we would call a

rose by any other name would smell as sweet?'' Doug Blanke, executive director of the Tobacco Law Center at William Mitchell, in the Feb. 15 Star Tribune, commenting on the

practice of bars declaring themselves theaters to avoid the Minnesota smoking ban.

"The only people who can answer that question are inside that deliberation room when the Court meets to decide how it's going to handle cases after oral argument. And the only people who are inside that room are the seven justices of the Supreme Court." Professor Peter Knapp, on how much power a Minnesota Supreme Court chief justice wields behind closed doors during a March interview on Minnesota Public Radio following the appointment of Eric Magnuson ’76 as Minnesota Supreme Court chief justice.

The William Mitchell Law Review is the most frequently cited legal journal in Minnesota by U.S. judges and is increasingly cited by other legal journals across the country, according to recent rankings of 1,431 U.S. journals by Washington and Lee University Law School. Mitchell’s Law Review ranked 22nd in the nation for citations by judges and

57th in the nation on citations by other legal journals, moving up five places from last year in the Washington and Lee ranking. The William Mitchell Law Review is a quarterly, student-edited journal. Founded in 1974, the Law Review publishes timely articles of regional, national, and international interest for legal practitioners, scholars, and lawmakers.

Law Review One of Top-Cited Journals by U.S. Judges

Mitchell on Law6

In the News

Take the Taxing out of Tax Law Legal Research

Legal Research Tips from the Mitchell Reference Librarians

At some point, it happens to every attorney. You’re tasked with researching the tax-related implications of a legal issue—and you haven’t studied tax law in 10 years. After that initial moment of panic subsides, turn to the CCH Tax Research Network and the BNA Tax and Accounting Center databases available at William Mitchell's Warren E. Burger Library. The CCH Tax Research Network features a wealth of information on taxation, including a hypertext version of the IRS code with links to annotations, explanations, and related topics of interest. Also invaluable to the intrepid tax researcher is the inclusion in the database of tax reporters, legislative updates, and cases and rulings for each of the 50 states.

The BNA Tax and Accounting Center is home to the renowned Tax Management Portfolios. Each Portfolio provides an in-depth, authoritative, and up-to-date examination of a specifi c aspect of tax law. Subject areas covered in the easy-to-browse database range from the minutiae of home offi ce deductions to the intricacies of hedge fund taxation. So the next time, or actually any time, you’re faced with the daunting prospect of tax research, we encourage you to visit the Warren E. Burger Library. The CCH and BNA databases are freely accessible to alumni on all public computer terminals. Contact a reference librarian at reference@wmitchell.edu for more information.

Vice President Walter Mondale Guest of National Security ForumFormer Vice President Walter Mondale discussed how U.S. intelligence agencies can balance national security interests with the law at a special National Security Forum event on April 10 at William Mitchell. The United States should not have to choose between protecting Americans and following the law, Mondale said. He criticized the current administration for bypassing the law in the name of public safety. “The idea of forgetting our law and values is not an acceptable answer to our problems,” he said, calling for new procedures that preserve fundamental rights while sustaining the principles of justice. “The lawyer’s highest challenge is saying no at a time when he is expected to say yes,” Mondale told the audience of 200 law students, professors, judges, attorneys, and community members. Mondale concluded with advice for new lawyers encountering ethical dilemmas: “If you have to choose between your career and the profession of law, stick with the profession. You’ll have a better life.”

Former Vice President Walter Mondale took questions on issues ranging from the role of the vice president to the

qualifi cations of the current presidential candidates after his National Security Forum

presentation.

7Spring 2008

Mitchell News

IP Institute Brief on Winning SideWilliam Mitchell’s Intellectual Property Institute filed an amicus brief in the patent rule-making case Tafas v. Dudas. Adopting many of the arguments set forth in the brief, the Eastern District Court of Virginia ruled in April that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) exceeded its authority in promulgating the new rules and invalidated them. The IP Institute’s brief helped the judge understand the radical change the new rules were to

have in shifting the burden of proof during the patent application process from the USPTO to the applicant, said Steven J. Moore, attorney for plaintiff Tafas from the Connecticut-based firm of Kelley Drye & Warren. “This argument will have profound effects on other pending USPTO regulations,” Moore said. The brief was drafted by Mitchell Professors Carl Moy and Jay Erstling and several student research assistants.

Center for Elder Justice & Policy Launched in March

Professor Kim Dayton kicked off the Center for Elder Justice & Policy with a reception attended by partnering organizations on March 19. Dayton, who is the director, and her

students have a number of projects under way designed to advocate for seniors, change laws, and provide more information for families and caregivers, including:• A housing discrimination law project with the Legal Aid Society of Minneapolis that will help educate tenants, landlords, and advocates about the housing rights of disabled older people.• Working with the Minnesota Caregivers Association, William Mitchell students are researching legislation and

information for people raising their grandchildren. In addition, students are working with Lutheran Social Services to make it easier for grandparents to gain custody of their grandchildren when necessary.• Students are working with the Elder Care Rights Alliance on a multi-year project to revise the state's Vulnerable Adults Act to better protect the victims of elder abuse and neglect.• Along with the Volunteers of America organization, students are administering a survey to determine the size and characteristics of Minnesota’s un-befriended elderly. The goal is to define a process for appointing health care decision makers for un-befriended elderly.• Finally, students also are working with the Alzheimer’s Association to improve dementia training laws, develop additional consumer education materials, and expand laws

William Mitchell students had a very successful competition season this year, taking third in the nation at the American Bar Association’s Client Counseling Competition, finishing second at a new state intellectual property competition, and advancing to the nationals in the ABA’s Arbitration Competition, Negotiation Competition, and National Moot Court Competition Alumni Michael Gibbons ’99 and Stacy Matthews St. George ’04 took Mitchell students to the nationals of the Client Counseling Competition for the third time in the past four years. Only 15 teams out of more than 150

from across the United States and Canada made it to the national competition. Jim Baker ’03 coached Mitchell students in the first annual Minnesota Intellectual Property Law Association (MIPLA) Cup Competition hosted by William Mitchell in March. The team placed second out of six teams from all four Minnesota law schools. Coaches Dionne Benson ’00 and Erika Burkhart Booth ’05 helped Mitchell students win the Region 8 Moot Court Competition and compete at the nationals for the first time in two decades.

Mitchell Alumni Lead Teams to Successful Competition Season

for paid time off for the care of a sick or disabled elderly.

Mitchell on Law2

&

Mitchell Mix

1L Carol Washington is Dedicated to Public Service

8

Phot

o by

Jon

atha

n C

hapm

an

Carol Washington started advocating for smoking cessation before she had even mastered the language. As a kindergartner, she unabashedly put out relatives’ cigarettes.Today, as a first-year Mitchell student, she works as a research assistant for the Tobacco Law Center at William Mitchell. The 30-year-old has spent more than six years working for tobacco control and smoking policy organizations, serving as the first director of the Minnesota African American Tobacco Education Network. “I am a natural-born advocate,” Washington says. “I want to inspire people and effectively impact their lives in a positive way.” After graduating in 2000 from Howard University in Washington, D.C., with a B.A. degree in political science, the Wisconsin native started working as a community affairs assistant for the Minnesota Smoke-Free Coalition. The Coalition and its members have advocated for decades for statewide smoke-free laws. This culminated in passage of the state’s 2007 Freedom to Breathe Act, banning smoking in workplaces, including bars and restaurants. “It was exciting because I was on the cusp of fundamental change on one of the country’s most important public health issues,” Washington says. Washington enjoys being on the forefront of change, so in 2003, at just 25 years old, she jumped at the chance to lead the Minnesota African American Tobacco Education Network, created by the Minnesota Big Tobacco lawsuit settlement and run by the Council on Black Minnesotans. On her own, reporting to a 12-member advisory board, she laid the foundation for the organization, creating a strategic plan, developing a policy agenda and communications plan, and coordinating the organization’s activities. “I knew at first it would be scary, but it was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity,” Washington says of the network that continues to engage the African American community throughout Minnesota. “We created something out of nothing.” “It’s ironic that African Americans started picking tobacco and today, thanks to targeted marketing by big tobacco

companies, are still enslaved to it,” Washington says, noting that African American adults have the second-highest rate of smoking (26.7 percent) of any ethnic group in the United States. Washington’s dedication to public service attracted the attention of the St. Paul Mayor’s Office, and in 2006 she went to work for newly elected Mayor Chris Coleman. She worked as an education and communications associate, providing direct assistance to constituents who contacted the office and assisting with getting the word out about initiatives. Washington enjoyed interacting with residents. “City government, especially with Mayor Coleman’s administration, is one of the last refuges in government where an ordinary citizen can call and see a real impact,” she says.

Washington came to Mitchell to gain practical legal experience to further her desire to make a difference. She is in Mitchell’s inaugural Fellows Program, which provides student participants an opportunity to delve deeper into legal topics and engage in leading-edge research with faculty. “I like being part of anything that’s the first of its kind,” she says of being a new Mitchell Fellow. “It’s great participating in an environment with people who think like you. I can ask questions and hear personal anecdotes, including failings, and learn from those.”

This summer Washington will clerk in the Adult Criminal Division of the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office. It’s a new direction she’s excited to explore. Although she has done several undergraduate internships in Washington, D.C., including with the Democratic National Committee, she has no plans to run for political office or return to the nation’s capital. She’d rather use her policy experience to become a successful student and, eventually, an effective practitioner. “I want to make change in a real way and do something that makes people’s lives better,” she says. “The most rewarding career for me is where I can make a positive impact. There are rewards other than financial. If you’re not doing what you like, then no amount of money will make you happy.”

Lisa Harden is a staff writer in William Mitchell's Office of Institutional Advancement.

9

Mitchell Mix

Spring 2008

“The most rewarding career for me is where I can make

a positive impact. There are rewards other than financial. If you’re not doing what you like, then no amount of money will

make you happy.”

By Lisa Harden

A natural advocate, Washington has already gained experience in policy and government

Phot

o by

Jon

atha

n C

hapm

an

Check out the Tobacco Law Center at www.wmitchell.edu under "Centers and Institutes."

10 Mitchell on Law

WANTED: First-Year Associatewith ExperienceWilliam Mitchell

is giving its

graduates and law

firm recruiters a

head start

11Spring 2008

Ray Faricy ’99, a partner at Lindquist & Vennum, loves working with third-year law students. He finds them bright, motivated, engaged, and earnest. But the second they toss their mortarboards, he knows that they’re something of a gamble. “In private practice, associates generally lose money for at least the first couple years with all the time the firm invests in them to get them up to speed,” he says. That idea isn’t heresy; it’s common knowledge. A 2003 study found that law firms don’t generally start recouping their investments in young lawyers until their fourth year at a firm. William Mitchell has long recognized the need for law students to receive both theoretical learning and practical legal skills training so they can be more effective as beginning lawyers. A leader in offering experiential opportunities to its students, William Mitchell was a pioneer in clinics, legal practicum, trial advocacy, and legal writing. But during the past few years, the school’s administrators and faculty have made an even more concerted effort to integrate skills with the rest of the curriculum. Their work is ahead of a trend sweeping through law schools today. A 2007 report by the Carnegie Foundation suggested law schools needed to ramp up their efforts to integrate legal education with the practice of law. “Most law schools give only casual attention to teaching students how to use legal thinking in the complexity of actual law practice,” its authors noted. “Legal education pays relatively little attention to direct training in professional practice.” Because of William Mitchell’s strong tradition in such practical offerings, it is able to continue building on an already strong foundation, rather than creating hands-on training courses from thin air.

From Classroom to Keystone A new series of Keystone classes is a perfect example of this effort. The courses, which are kept deliberately small, are designed to help students address real-world challenges while getting feedback from their professors and practicing lawyers. Three of the new courses introduced this spring—Business Practice Legal Practicum, Business Buy/Sell Transaction Simulation, and Elder Justice and Policy—are already earning rave reviews. For instance, in the Business Practice Legal Practicum, co-directed by Professor John Sonsteng and Adjunct Professor Karen Lundquist ’05, students coax a fictitious young widow through an entire business development. They provide

guidance as she opens an eco-friendly sporting goods store, hires employees, sells products, and sells the business a few years later.

Sonsteng says it’s been an eye-opener for students. “Adults don’t learn through lectures,” he says. “They learn by identifying a problem and solving the problem. In the class, they work on property law, intellectual property, zoning, negotiations, and contracts.” Through the course, they learn that the legal theories they read in texts can’t always be used to address practical realities. Walt Duffy ’70, a partner at Faegre & Benson who gave a lecture for Sonsteng’s course, says students are quick learners. Though they might not have

done tasks perfectly the first time, they’ll have the background they need when they do them again at a firm where the stakes are much higher. “When my daughter plays piano, for example, she’ll practice in front of her family and then in front of her classmates before she does a recital on the stage,” he says. “The analogy is the same here: experience matters.” Students, meanwhile, say that the course is giving their legal education depth and breadth that they can’t always get in a typical classroom setting. “So many people, attorneys as well as other professionals, have given their time to share their knowledge and experience with us,” says James Haarmeyer, a 3L student in the Business Practice Legal Practicum. “We did a mock city council presentation during which we were seeking a zoning change for our (ficticious) client. We anticipated doing the presentation in front of two adjuncts who would play the role of council members. We ended up doing the presentation in front of the two adjuncts, the mayor of New Brighton, the city manager of New Brighton, and a former New Brighton council member! Suffice to say, we learned a lot about the process, the law, and ourselves.”

“Somebody who has done well in this course is going

to be attractive to a firm with a corporate practice. This is

going to save them months and months of hands-on training.”

– Professor Jim Hogg

By Erin Peterson

Illus

trat

ions

by

Kei

th S

keen

Continued on next page

Mitchell on Law12

Co-director Lundquist, who graduated from Mitchell just three years ago, feels that she was well prepared for her law career thanks to courses such as Advocacy, Advanced Advocacy, and Writing & Representation: Advice & Persuasion. Still, she believes that the practicum she’s helping lead now would have provided an even stronger base for her career after graduation. “Practicum courses give students insight into aspects of the practice of law that are never touched on in any other class, such as representation agreements, time sheets, billing, and daily correspondence,” she says. “This is what allows students to really learn, as they are applying what they have learned in other classes to a real-life situation.” Professor Jim Hogg, who teaches the pilot Business Buy/Sell Transaction Simulation Keystone course, believes that these classes, which more closely replicate what students will do as associates, are invaluable tools. They benefit not just students, but the firms who hire them. “Somebody who has done well in this course is going to be attractive to a firm with a corporate practice,” he says. “This is going to save them months and months of hands-on training.” In addition to the simulation models represented by the two business law Keystones, there are Keystone courses linking externships with seminars, such as the Elder Justice and Policy course in which students provide policy research for elder justice organizations and investigate the use of technology in the practice of elder law and elder advocacy, and plans for a live-client clinic model as well. If the pilots prove successful—and all indications suggest that they’re an extraordinary asset—more will be rolled out in forthcoming years.

Pathways to Excellence The second major tool William Mitchell has developed to help students craft a strong legal education is Pathways to the Profession of Law. This Web tool helps students plan their courses throughout school, find student organizations and externships, and read the latest news related to their law interests. There currently are 14 distinct Pathways, ranging from business law to civil litigation to real estate law. Professor Denise Roy, who spearheaded the effort to create the tool as chair of the curriculum committee, says the Pathways were inspired originally by a desire to help students come up with a reasonable course schedule. “We have a wonderful curriculum, but if all you’ve got is an alphabetical list of courses,

you’ll probably miss a lot of information,” she says. Each Pathway includes a flowchart that advises students about specific courses and ways they might structure their course load during their time at Mitchell. Students curious about a class in the flowchart can click on it for a description, a list of prerequisites, and information on grading and credits. Students can look at sample schedules or print out a chart that allows them to tailor their own schedule. The more the curriculum committee dug into the project, the more members realized how much bigger and more useful the

site could be. The committee began adding customized information to each Pathway about student organizations, competitions, professional organizations, and career information. The site includes links to well-respected blogs with the latest news as well as other free Internet resources. Students love the well organized and easy-to-understand site. They can find the information they need without getting overwhelmed, and they can feel confident that they won’t overlook anything as they plan their course schedules. The site has even earned

raves from Judith Wegner, one of the authors of the Carnegie Foundation report. She praised it as innovative and unique, encouraging Mitchell to share it with peer schools. Roy says there are additional plans in the works for the Pathways site, including chat spaces, practicing lawyers who may serve as Pathway mentors, and information on public service opportunities.

Looking Ahead As the number of Keystone courses increases and Pathways offerings expand, William Mitchell administrators hope that all students will be able to take advantage of the many different ways the school helps prepare students. They hope students will understand that law isn’t just about big ideas, but it’s also about practical solutions and experiences. The more they’re able to integrate both into their learning, the more attractive they’ll become to those who are looking to hire. “This work is just one more example of Mitchell looking into the future,” says Hogg. “We’re doing as much as we can to prepare students, once they graduate, to practice in the real world.”

“We did a mock city council presentation during which we were seeking a zoning

change for our (ficticious) client. We anticipated doing the presentation in front of two adjuncts who would play the role of council members. We ended up doing the

presentation in front of the two adjuncts, the mayor of New Brighton, the city manager of

New Brighton, and a former New Brighton council member!”

–James Haarmeyer, 3L Business Practice Legal Practicum student

WANTED: First Year Associate

Continued from page 11

Nick Mazzocco 1LNo one understands how diffi cult it is to balance law school, a full-time job, and a family better than newly appointed Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Eric Magnuson ’76. He knows a little support, both moral and fi nancial, can go a long way. “I went to Mitchell because I needed to work my way through school,” Magnuson says. “I was lucky enough to get a job working for one of the best role models available, someone who also had worked full time to get through school—former Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Douglas Amdahl ’51. He gave me the inspiration to handle a job and school at the same time and the opportunity.” Continuing that legacy of helping others and in honor of his mentor, Magnuson created a scholarship for a student who works full time and has dependent children. “Law school is hard in a lot of ways,” Magnuson says. “When you're trying to hold down a job, raise a family, and go to law school all at the same time, a little help can mean a lot.” Nick Mazzocco, a part-time Mitchell 1L student, full-time construction project manager for United Properties, and married father of two, is the fi rst

recipient of the Magnuson Amdahl Working Student Scholarship. “It’s humbling to receive a scholarship that not only honors one of the most infl uential chief justices of the state Supreme Court, but is sponsored by the state’s leading appellate lawyer who will be a chief justice as well,” Mazzocco says. The scholarship, along with others he’s received, will ease the fi nancial burden on Mazzocco’s family. His wife stays at home, and he hopes to pay off his student loans before his children start college. “Juggling work, family, and school is certainly a challenge,” Mazzocco says. “It’s not just one person committing to it, but four. By offering scholarships, you bring a broader spectrum of people into the legal profession. It provides an opportunity for those who may not be able to go to law school to do so and encourages those who

are going to do their best.”Mazzocco, 31, wants

to use his eight years of construction and real estate industry experience working in real estate law. “During my construction career, I have reviewed contract documents, drafted rebuttals to claim requests from subcontractors, and interpreted lease agreements,” he says. “Having a law degree in addition to a civil engineering degree will separate me from my peers and open more doors than an MBA.” Mazzocco is already achieving success in his academic career. His work in fall classes earned him a spot in the Mitchell Fellows Program, and he will eventually be "apprenticed" to a Mitchell professor doing cutting-edge work in an area that interests him. Inspired by the legacies of Amdahl and Magnuson, Mazzocco hopes someday to leave his own imprint on the legal profession. “I’d like to be seen as someone who is fair, can achieve the goals of the company I work for, and always keeps family fi rst,” he says. – Lisa Harden

school to do so and encourages those who are going to do their best.”Mazzocco, 31, wants

For more information about creating a scholarship at William Mitchell, contact Lisa C. Barton ‘97 by emailinglisa.barton@wmitchell.edu or calling (651) 290-6357.

Schola rships Chan ge LivesTwo Supreme Court Chief Justices Support a Working Student

Scholarship recipient Nick Mazzocco with Justices Eric Magnuson ´76 and

Douglas Amdahl ´51.

13

Pho

to b

y M

ose

s Sh

irai

Mitchell on Law14 Mitchell on Law

As the boundaries

between work and

home become blurred,

can lawyers—both

women and men—

fi nd balance in the

workplace alongside

pursuing a career,

raising children, and,

increasingly, caring for

elderly parents? Illustratio

ns b

y Pamela B

eldin

g

FindingYourBalance

emember work-life balance? For attorneys working in private practice, the notion has always been somewhat utopian, but

here is a refresher: work-life balance is the concept that one’s work and personal life can be managed in such a way as to make a fulfilling, happy whole. It was a hot topic in the ’80s and ’90s, driven largely by women who were tired of trying to do everything. Instead of being superwomen, they reasoned, they would approach the situation more like a buffet, taking a little of each thing until they had a tasty, balanced meal on their plates. But often, too much of everything cascaded onto the plate unbidden, spilling over in a messy heap. Now, thanks largely to technology, we hear less about work-life balance and more about work-life integration. The evolution from balance to integration turns the buffet into a stew. BlackBerrys, email, wireless, cell phones, laptops, video conferences … such innovations mean that one can work from home while cooking dinner or even while pacing the sidelines at a Little League game. Conversely, the well-integrated employee can tend to personal tasks at work. Waiting for a client meeting to start? Why not order the week’s groceries or schedule a haircut? It’s all possible with the flick of a wrist and an Internet connection. So, with work and life so seamlessly integrated, everyone’s happy, right? Apparently not. It turns out that the technology not only allows attorneys to work from home, it practically demands that they do. And so the word “balance” is making a comeback, but with a twist: This time around, men are joining the discussion, and the conversation is about more than child care. In fact, one factor alone is bigger than everyone and everything else at the table: demographics. Take a look at this triple whammy facing law firms (and every employer

for that matter): First, the leading edge of the bubble we call the Baby Boomers is entering retirement. When the rest of the bubble follows, employers will face the difficult task of replacing large numbers of skilled workers. Second, these same workers, and those just younger than them, are shouldering the responsibility of elder care in a way that this nation has never before experienced. With so many seniors living into their ’80s and ’90s, working adults are now managing their parents’ households (or multiple households, in the case of divorce or blended families) along with their own. Thanks to delayed marriages and childbearing, these same workers may be raising teenagers, or even toddlers, simultaneously. Can we say flex time?

The third factor in the triple whammy may provide the most difficult challenge of all for law firms: The next-generation attorneys who won’t work for firms that don’t respect their personal lives. Consider the group of 130 Stanford law students now publishing a ranking of firms based on their treatment of employees. Along with the list comes a pact from these young attorneys not to work for firms that don’t rank well. Like any thin edge of a wedge, this kind of thing will be easy to ignore at first. But as firms experience more retirements, and a more unified front from the replacement troops, it seems unlikely

that they will be able to continue doing business as usual. Indeed, one study has already found that more than 70 percent of associates tracked between 2002 and 2004, both male and female, left within the first five years of employment at firms. Other studies— exit polls, if you will—find 60 percent of women and 40 percent of men cite a lack of work-life balance as the reason for leaving a practice. The talent exodus doesn’t come cheap: some estimates place the cost for replacing a second-year associate as high as $300,000. William Mitchell Professor Ann Juergens sees the cost of attrition as a potential catalyst for change. “When the firms see that it is costing them real money and that they are losing some of the best talent,” she notes, “the firms will begin to care.” One of the biggest problems in firms, she says, is not outright bias against attorneys with families, but rather the ingrained processes that create unwitting bias. “What lawyers should examine in their workplaces,” she says, “are policies that were implemented without thinking about their adverse impacts on caregivers. For example, policies that strip all seniority from employees who leave the workplace and then return are especially tough on caregivers who wish to take a few years away from the office to care for family members.” Some of those policies came to light for a CLE audience at William Mitchell recently when Juergens led a panel of attorneys in discussing the current state of work-life integration in the practice of law. Among the problems noted for lawyers working less than full time were: the disproportionate pay penalty, the loss of computer equipment and administrative support for one who worked from home, and the loss of client relationships. Suggested solutions included

By Amy Lindgren

R

15Spring 2008

Continued on next page

With expectations in some firms having risen beyond

2,000 billable hours annually, the structure clearly

contributes to pressures faced by attorneys who can

barely find time for lunch, much less a week off to care

for a parent.

16

creating job share positions, committing to the professional advancement and proportionately equal pay for part-time attorneys, and providing more on-site resources such as lactation rooms and elder-care information. But this is all just window dressing compared to the biggest idea of all: removal of the billable hour system. With expectations in some firms having risen beyond 2,000 billable hours annually, the structure clearly contributes to pressures faced by attorneys who can barely find time for lunch, much less a week off to care for a parent. One firm has come up with a method to monitor work allocation to ensure all attorneys, regardless of full-time status or other considerations, are allocated appropriate work to enhance their development as lawyers. Dorsey & Whitney, for example, uses a six-month review policy for all part-time associates, to ensure the workload is properly balanced for the situation. Other features include a sabbatical leave of 12 weeks for partners, a billable hour requirement of 1,850 hours in most offices, provision of backup child care arrangements, and regular education programs on issues such as elder care and raising teenagers. “Our retention of women has

improved,” says Diane Malfeld, partner and co-chair of Dorsey’s Diversity Steering Committee, with a current class of senior associates that is evenly divided between men and women. And, “of the women who became partner January 1 [2008], several of them were reduced-time lawyers. That’s been common for us.” Time will tell if all firms will work to implement changes, or if the changes will come unbidden, through outside circumstances. But it’s difficult to imagine any firm remaining unchanged in the face of such overwhelming forces. And why would they want to? In the end, the solution to the work-life conflict in law firms may come in the most natural way imaginable: Through the changing experiences of the partners who make the rules. As these (still mostly) men begin dealing with their own aging parents, and the work-life issues of their adult children, there

Just try not to call the change an "accommodation," says Juergens. “We should move away from the term ‘accommodate,’" she says. “When you

the presumption is that having caregiving responsibilities is abnormal.” Touché.

Amy Lindgren is a St. Paul-based freelance writer.

The New Work-Life Balance Up Close and Personal

Five alumni demonstrate there’s more than one way to bring about a semblance of balance in life.

A part-time solution As an intellectual property associate for Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner and the mother of two kids under the age of eight, Patti Jurkovich ’97 has worked hard to maintain balance. In 1999, when her father died, Jurkovich was the first in her firm to take unpaid time off under the Family Medical Leave Act. She returned to work at 80 percent time, to keep

Mitchell on Law

Can the billable hour be replaced?Deborah Epstein Henry, founder

of Flex-Time Lawyers, LLC, has

crafted a model comprised of

five components to replace

the billable hour. The concept,

known as FACTS, she wrote

in the November 2007 issue

of Diversity & The Bar, meets

“billable hour demands while

offering all lawyers work-life

choices.” The five parts of

her model are fixed hours,

annualized hours, core hours,

shared hours, and target

hours. The five-part system

allows attorneys to work

when needed and leave when

needed. Learn more at

Patti Jurkovich '97

Finding Your Balance

Continued from page 15

is hope—and growing anecdotal

talk about making accommodations,

evidence—that things will improve.

www.flextimelawyers.com.

17Spring 2008

flexibility for her mother’s needs, then took a year off without pay when her daughter was born in 2001. Since the birth of her son, she now maintains a 50 percent workload in her firm. For Jurkovich, going part time has been the right answer. “I’m certain that we can keep making this better,” she says.

A full-time solution Lynnette Slater Crandall ’00 joined the firm of Dorsey & Whitney shortly after graduation, then married and had a child while working toward partnership. She achieved that goal recently, and says her six-month maternity

leave three years ago “didn’t throw me off the partnership track” largely because of the firm’s flexible policies. “I’ve never had a problem filling my billable hours,” she notes, “but if I couldn’t work from home occasionally, it would make my life a lot more difficult.” Time management has also helped Slater Crandall make it home for dinner each night. “One thing I’ve noticed is that since I started a family, I’m more efficient in the office,” she says. “I’m probably a little less social, but it’s worth it to get home on time.”

Taking a sabbatical When Celeste Grant ’91 passed the Bar just short of her 40th birthday, her husband supervised their teenagers while she worked the long days required of an intellectual property litigator. In one year alone she logged 2,400 billable hours, not counting travel time. A bout with thyroid cancer resulted in several medical leaves, but Grant always came back full time, largely out of loyalty to her firm, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, which she credits with providing the support and flexibility she needed to recover. Then she hit a rough patch, when six family members died in a short period. Citing unresolved grief and a heightened sense of mortality, Grant quit her job to travel the world. She returned to a position as Minnesota’s deputy state auditor, which she finds more manageable.

Going corporate Law school friends Steve Anderson ’94 and Adam Lockhart ’94 went different ways after graduation. Lockhart tried a government position, then went into legal research, eventually landing at Thomson Corporation as a senior attorney editor. Anderson, meanwhile, turned an earlier clerkship into an associate position in personal injury. After four years, however, he was ready to go corporate, too. He now works as a team coordinator at Thomson, overseeing 18 people working on U.S. Code annotated updates. “There’s a lot less money involved here,” Anderson notes, “but fortunately I got out of litigation before I was making real money, so it didn’t hurt as bad. The compensating factor is the schedule. In private practice, I once worked 35 days straight, 10- to 12-hour days.” While Anderson was working those hours, his wife, Robin, was also working, and they were fitting in child rearing as best they could. After Anderson left private practice, they decided to balance their lives by having Robin stay home full time. Meanwhile, in the Lockhart household, the strategy is for Lockhart to use his job’s flexibility to handle their son’s needs, while his wife, Kris Wiinikainen, maintains a more rigid schedule in her municipal job. It’s an arrangement that suits Lockhart well. “This place is terrific in terms of having kids,” he notes. “I’m able to schedule my days in such a way that I can see my son’s school programs without any difficulty at all.”

Steve Anderson '94

Adam Lockhart '94

Lynnette Slater Crandall '00

We'd like to hear your comments on this story. Email magazine@wmitchell.edu.

Mitchell on Law

The Future of Food

18

Like so many areas of science today, the technology behind

much of the food we eat is moving far faster than our ability to sort out the legal

and ethical questions that inevitably have

arisen along the way.

19Spring 2008

you think eating seems a lot more complicated than it used to be, you

are not alone. Even a quick grocery run can bring on a rush of mind-boggling questions. What’s better: wild-caught salmon or farm-raised? If the frozen corn is not labeled as “non-GMO,” does that mean it has been genetically modified? What’s bovine growth hormone, and why do some milk labels specifically say it has come from cows that were not treated with it? Issues like these not only have consumers thinking, they have piqued the interest of the legal community as well. Until recently, food and drug courses have been taught in combination, with the emphasis being on drugs. Now food law is becoming an area of its own, attracting the attention of legal professionals like William Mitchell College of Law Professor Donna Byrne. Byrne has been teaching tax law at Mitchell for more than a decade. But her growing interest in legal issues related to food motivated her this year to introduce a new Food Law and Policy seminar. Students taking the course are exploring traditional topics, such as regulatory issues around food and drugs and the Food and Drug Administration’s process for approving ingredients and overseeing labeling and marketing. But they are also delving into sticky agricultural law topics that are growing in importance, such as establishing clear organic standards and regulating genetically engineered crops, cloned animals, and pesticide use. Like so many areas of science today, the technology behind much of the food we eat is moving far faster than our ability to sort out the legal and ethical questions that inevitably have arisen along the way. This has opened up ripe territory for law professionals. Patent lawyers and litigators work on biotech rights. Administrative attorneys deal with the FDA on product approval. Product

liability lawyers have been busy looking into recent food recalls of everything from packaged spinach to cantaloupe. And, internationally, there are trade consequences to navigate in light of Europe’s ongoing refusal to accept genetically modified foods. “As always,” says Byrne, “where there’s controversy, there will be lawyers.”

The Law and Politics of Food Byrne’s interest in food issues began early when she and her family rallied around her younger twin sisters who struggled with anorexia as children. An avid reader of nutrition news, Byrne has long followed debates about everything from the ills caused by saturated fats and the role of the glycemic index in understanding how carbohydrates affect blood glucose levels to the structure of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s food pyramid. “So much that you read is contradictory,” says Byrne, who is also bothered by what she sees as a preponderance of soft science behind a lot of food studies.

“There is a big difference between the correlation between two variables and the demonstration of causation.” For example, she continues, “A lot of what you read says obesity is a risk factor for heart disease. People with heart disease are often overweight, but that doesn’t mean that’s the cause of the disease. And if that’s true, then we’re basing layers of government policy on a belief that what causes health problems may not be true at all. How can this not make you

question the way we make food policy in this country?” The need for truth when it comes to food is a recurring theme for Byrne, whose current work focuses on labeling issues. At a recent conference in Berkeley, Calif., Byrne presented a paper on voluntary and mandatory labeling during a food law and culture panel. Among her many points, she believes the one that affected people most was her argument that too little attention is paid to the characteristics of consumers when deciding what should and should not appear on food labels. Instead, food labeling is often politically charged and intertwined with the financial interests of big business. By way of example, Byrne points to the FDA’s January decision to allow meat and dairy products from cloned animals onto supermarket shelves without labeling them as such. This didn’t sit well with consumer advocates who had made clear their opposition to the absence of labeling. So the debate has now moved into legal territory. Business

Week reported in March that at least 13 bills had been introduced in state legislatures across the country calling for some type of wording or symbols denoting cloned food. Proponents of label-free cloned

products, including biotech and livestock companies, argue that identifying a food item as cloned will only confuse or scare shoppers into thinking there is reason to be concerned about the safety of the food. This same argument has long been made by biotech giants like Monsanto, maker of the synthetic bovine growth hormone known as Posilac. Despite FDA assurances that milk from cows treated with growth hormones is safe, The New York Times and other

Professor Donna Byrne is preparing her students to tackle food law's new frontier.

Pho

to il

lust

rati

on

by

Mik

e K

rivi

t

Continued on next page

By Meleah Maynard

“I know some of our lawyers will go on to work in food law. Some will probably work

for companies like Cargill or General Mills, so the better they are at thinking about food law beyond what is right in front of them, the

better off we all will be.”

20 Mitchell on Law

media report that a growing number of consumers are opting to buy milk labeled as coming from cows that have not been treated. In response, these analysts say, Monsanto and its allies have stepped up pressure to restrict or even ban such labels, claiming that consumers know not what they do. “They claim that consumers are being misled by these labels,” Byrne explains. “I’m not convinced. It seems that knowledgeable consumers will pay more to avoid genetically modifi ed products, and non-knowledgeable ones wind up acting the same way when there

is labeling to look at. We still have a lot to learn about how consumers make choices, and we need to look at how industry decides what information is ‘bad news.’”

Looking Ahead and Spreading the Word About a year and a half ago, Byrne began editing her own food law blog on the law professor network (lawprofessors.typepad.com/foodlaw) as an alternative to clipping and saving news articles that interested her. Entries run the gamut from debate over nutritional guidelines and regulation of poultry plants to the recent ground beef recall. In February, Byrne was asked to write an online column for FindLaw about farm-raised vs. wild salmon. Specifi cally, she was interested in the colorant added to farm-raised salmon to make it pink. While wild salmon get their orange-pink color from the krill they eat, she wrote, farm-raised salmon are gray due to their diet of feed made from a blend of fi sh. Adding color has been shown to make the salmon more appealing to consumers. The trouble is that although cantaxanthin,

as the colorant is known, has been approved by the FDA, it has also been linked to retinal damage when people have taken it orally to create an artifi cial tan. At issue is the labeling of these fi sh. Consumer advocates want it. Fish farmers do not. Lawsuits are pending, so right now it is up to the courts to decide. Even with all of her reading, Byrne was surprised to discover that farm-raised salmon were dyed and so were a lot of her friends and colleagues. This, she says, is a reminder that there is still plenty of room for better thinking when it comes to food law issues, nutrition policy, and agricultural technology. Perhaps some of her students will help lead the way. “I know some of our lawyers will go on to work in food law,” she says. “Some will probably work for companies like Cargill or General Mills, so the better they are at thinking about food law beyond what is right in front of them, the better off we all will be.” Meleah Maynard is a Minneapolis freelance writer.

The Future of Food

Continued from page 19

Mitchell Faculty

“We still have a lot to learn about how consumers make choices, and we need to look at how industry decides what information is ‘bad news.’”

— Donna M. Byrne, Professor of Law

donna.byrne@wmitchell.edu.

Teaches: Clinic—Legal Planning Clinic for Tax-Exempt Organizations and Low Income Clients (formerly Tax Planning Clinic)

Estate and Gift Taxation

Estates and Trusts

Food Law and Policy Seminar

Income Tax

International Tax

Giving Back Looking Forward

Bob Collins ’65, an estate planning lawyer at Lindquist & Vennum and an adjunct faculty member at William Mitchell, has spent years encouraging grads to give back. Still, he knows that fi nding recent law school grads who are eager to send big donations to their alma mater are about as common as recent law school grads who are eager to hear Uncle Louie reel off his latest batch of lawyer jokes: remarkably rare. “Law school graduates today often have big debts, so they’re thinking about survival, not about charitable contributions,” Collins says. Attitudes toward giving (unlike Uncle Louie’s knee slappers) evolve over time. Like a seed, charitable contributions often start small, but can grow much larger with the right nurturing. Knowing the stages of giving can help people understand not only where they are now, but also how they can consider moving forward in the future, whether it’s a gift for $10 or $10 million. In the fi rst few years after graduation, says Collins, just getting into a habit of giving is key. Like daily exercise, making it a practice to give even small amounts can make a big difference over time. “A gift of even a few dollars is important—not necessarily because of the dollar amount, but because of the charitable intent,” says Collins. As years go by, the checks may swell to a few hundred or a few thousand dollars. No longer saddled with law school debts, alumni may have a bit of extra cash to share each year. More important, says Collins, they begin to more fully understand the value of the education they received at William Mitchell—for many it has led to engaging work, a comfortable lifestyle, and wide-ranging opportunities.

“The major impetus [for giving] becomes gratitude,” he says. “It’s gratitude for the opportunity to be a lawyer and gratitude for what the school has provided.” When alumni move into their later years, many will want to move beyond their annual gifts. They’ll look to the most important institutions in their lives with the hope of creating a legacy. They often hope to create something that will serve to help preserve the values they believe are important, says Bob McLeod ’92, a lawyer at Lindquist & Vennum and an adjunct faculty member teaching Estate and Trust Law. A legacy gift—usually created by designating funding from an IRA, a will, or life insurance policy—can help achieve that goal. “When you’re no longer raising your kids, you fi nally have a chance to look back and reward those who rewarded you,” he says. “Maybe they want to help current students through a scholarship endowment, or maybe they want to name a wing of a building.” Though such gifts can seem complicated, they can be as simple as changing the benefi ciary on an account or will. Structured appropriately, a gift may end up having signifi cant tax benefi ts as well. While large gifts are often highlighted, you don’t have to be a Rockefeller to create a gift that can make a lasting impact on William Mitchell and its students for years to come. The importance of giving comes not with a specifi c gift or a certain dollar amount, but the understanding of the importance of stewardship. “Each generation supports the generation to come,” says McLeod. “Just as we were trained as young lawyers, we must return the favor for the next group. It’s about paying it forward.”

Gratitude

21Spring 2008

By Erin Peterson

“Each generation supports the

generation to come. Just as we

were trained as young lawyers,

we must return the favor for the

next group. It’s about paying it

forward.” – Bob McLeod ’92

Knowing the stages of giving can help when making charitable donations, whether you’re giving $10 or $10 million.

22

Workin g where she's n eeded Devoting a Legal Career to Representing Low-Income People

Jessie Nicholson '85Director & CEO

Southern Minnesota Regional Services

Phot

o by

Rao

ul B

enav

ides

Jessie Nicholson ’85, chief executive officer of Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services, keeps a framed black and white photograph of herself at age 6 months on the table in her St. Paul office as a reminder of her upbringing. Nicholson grew up in Waterloo, Iowa, with six siblings, and at a young age was inspired by jurist William Parker, the first African American judge in Iowa, to give something back. “Judge Parker said that the law is about helping people,” Nicholson recalls. “I never forgot that.” Nicholson has worked for SMRLS, which provides free legal representation and advice to low-income people in 33 counties of southern Minnesota, for her entire 22-year legal career. She earned a bachelor’s degree in sociology and a master’s degree in Spanish from the University of Northern Iowa, where she taught Spanish before moving to Minnesota. She served as senior leadership attorney for SMRLS Refugee, Immigrant and Migrant Services practice group before becoming the organization’s CEO in 2007. She is responsible for the work of more than 57 staff attorneys, 57 other staff, and approximately 500 active volunteer attorneys who helped more than 11,000 clients in 2007. Nicholson is the first African American woman to head a legal aid organization in the upper Midwest

and one of only eight in the entire country. “Jessie has always been a champion for people of color who cannot afford or do not have access to our legal system,” says William Mitchell Associate Dean of Multicultural Affairs Andriel Dees ’95. “She is always willing to listen and guide those of us who are striving to be leaders in the legal community. These qualities are what make her such an inspiration to me.” Nicholson never set out to be a trailblazer. “I am simply doing what I need to do,” she says. “This is where I need to be.”

With the rise of housing foreclosures and predatory lending practices, SMRLS offices are busy. Immigration law has become a major focus for SMRLS clients facing many challenges compounded by language and cultural differences, Nicholson says. She cites the case of a landlord who wouldn’t allow a family to hang a particular type of curtain even though the type of covering was needed to respect the family’s religious practices. SMRLS staff brought in a religious leader to

explain the situation. “To succeed in public service you need a real understanding of what it is to be poor and not have meaningful access to legal services,” Nicholson says. “We are not here because of the salary, but because we are committed to the mission of helping people.” For many SMRLS clients, three-fourths of whom are women, it’s not about winning but making sure they have meaningful access to the civil justice system and are heard, Nicholson says. “We don’t want to see a judicial system where people don’t have access. The

people who come to us want, need, and deserve high-quality representation. We make sure to listen to and always respect the person across the desk.” Funding the nonprofit organization is a constant challenge as resources shrink and caseloads grow. SMRLS staff cannot meet the needs of every individual, so the offices produce hundreds of educational materials

for the public and profession. Keeping up with the changing legal landscape and making sure staff stay motivated are daily tasks. Nicholson, married 35 years with a son in college, has another office photo that keeps her grounded: an Italian monastery she visits regularly to unwind. She says, “No matter what you do, whether it’s sweeping the streets or running SMRLS, you need to take time for yourself. And never forget where you came from.”

Spring 2008 23

“We don’t want to see a judicial

system where people don’t have

access. The people who come to

us want, need, and deserve high-

quality representation. ”

Alumni Profile

By Lisa Harden

Phot

o by

Rao

ul B

enav

ides

1957Robert M. Greising (St. Paul College of Law) was honored for 50 years in the law by the Minnesota State Bar Association.

1975Robert R. Drevlow joined the Zenith Insurance Company, Woodland Hills, Calif., as vice president of operations for claims.

Chief Judge John P. Smith, 9th Judicial District, received the Rosalie E. Wahl Judicial Award for Excellence from the MSBA Public Law Section.

1976Douglas J. Dehn was voted shareholder of Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Mpls.

Brian E. Wojtalewicz was elected treasurer of the Minnesota Association for Justice.

1977John “Jack” Harper III was elected president of the executive committee of Krass Monroe, Mpls.

1978Thomas M. Manion and Jay Wheelock ’05 opened the Manion and Wheelock Law Offi ce, Lanesboro, Minn.

Michael T. Norton was elected president of Kennedy & Graven, Mpls.

1979Michael J. Ford was elected president of the MSBA for 2008-09.

1980Barbara J. Gislason spoke at the American Veterinary Medical Law Association and the 2007 American Bar Association Annual Meeting. She is also featured in the August 2007 DVM Newsmagazine.

Judge Margaret Shaw Johnson retired as a Minnesota 3rd Judicial District Court judge.

George A. Meinz was elected shareholder of Gray Plant Mooty, Mpls.

1981Patrick R. Burns received the 2007 Pro Bono Award of Excellence from the MSBA Public Law Section.

Class Notes

24

The Minnesota bench has seven more Mitchell alumni following recent appointments by Gov. Tim Pawlenty.

Eric J. Magnuson ’76 will assume his duties as chief justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court June 1.

Thomas M. Neuville ’76

3rd District

John H. Guthmann ’80 2nd District

Jerome B. Abrams ’81 1st District

Thomas M. Fitzpatrick ’8110th District

Earl E. Maus ’829th District

Fred Karasov ’83 4th District

Seven Mitchell alumni appointed to Minnesota bench

Mitchell on Law

Timothy J. Hassett was elected to the board of directors of Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon and Vogt, St. Paul.

Bradley H. Lehrman joined Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, Mpls., as a shareholder.

Mansco Perry III was selected chief investment offi cer of the board of trustees for the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System, Baltimore.

Kathleen Flynn Peterson steps down in July as president of the American Association for Justice.

1982Milton H. Luoma was appointed assistant professor, Information and Computer Science Department, College of Arts and Sciences, at Metropolitan State University, St. Paul.

1983M. Peter Adler joined Pepper Hamilton, Washington, D.C., as a partner.

Terrence E. Bishop was elected to the board of directors at Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren, Bloomington, Minn.

Joan H. Lucas was elected president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers-Minnesota chapter.

1984William S. Forsberg joined Leonard, Street and Deinard, Mpls., as a shareholder.

David J. Hough was appointed deputy Hennepin County administrator.

Martin R. Lueck was elected chairman of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Mpls.

Thomas E. Marshall was elected treasurer of the Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association.

Janet M. Nelson was elected president of the Legal Marketing Association Minnesota chapter.

Paul A. Rajkowski was elected president of the Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association.

1985Joan G. Hallock joined Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug & Brandt, St. Paul, as general partner.

Charles O. Lentz joined Gray Plant Mooty, Mpls., of counsel to its employment law practice group.

Kathryn Santelmann Richtman was appointed co-chair of the American Bar Association’s Juvenile Justice Committee.

1986Candace L. Dale joined Burke & Thomas, Arden Hills, Minn., as partner.

Debra A. Holtz was named director of the Minnesota Offi ce of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care.

James W. Keeler Jr. was appointed Carver County (Minn.) attorney.

Clark D. Opdahl was elected managing partner, Henson & Efron, Mpls.

1987Beth E. Bertelson, is an independent and neutral arbitrator with the National Arbitration Forum.

James P. Carey was elected secretary of the Minnesota Association for Justice.

Michael C. Krikava was elected director at Briggs and Morgan, Mpls.

Noreen C. Phillips received the William E. McGee Public Defender Award of Excellence from the MSBA Public Law Section.

Class Notes

25Spring 2008 Read the magazine online @ www.wmitchell.edu/alumni

Alumni serve on new MN Supreme Court Historical Society

Recently retired Supreme Court Justice Sam Hanson ’65 is the founding chairperson of the new Minnesota Supreme Court Historical Society. Retired Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Esther Tomljanovich ’55 (middle) and current Justice Helen Meyer ’83 are on the board of directors. Modeled after the U.S. Supreme Court Historical Society, the newly formed nonprofi t entity is dedicated to the collection, preservation, and promotion of Minnesota’s judicial history, by supporting research, education, and publications.

26

Class Notes

1987 (continued) Jody A. Cohen Press and her husband have formed Press Law Offi ce, practicing in estate and business planning, probate, guardianship, and commercial collections.

Sharon L. Van Dyck was voted president-elect of the Minnesota Association for Justice.

1988William C. Griffi th was elected to the board of directors at Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren, Bloomington, Minn.

Dennis J. Unger was elected president of the Minnesota Land Title Association.

David S. Wething was reelected chairman of the board of directors of Minnesota Masonic Elder Services and also was elected to the board of directors of Minnesota Masonic Charities.

1989Ronald R. Bradley is general counsel for Capitol Lein Records & Research, St. Paul.

Roseanne M. Hope joined Faegre & Benson, Mpls., as special counsel, real estate practice.

Richard H. Kyle Jr. was appointed to the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board.

1990Stephen G. Froehle was promoted to senior legal director at Medtronic, Mpls.

David M. Jann joined Faegre & Benson, Mpls.

Jacqueline M. Schuh joined the St. Cloud, Minn., offi ce of Gray Plant Mooty.

1991Nancy E. Anderson was promoted to senior vice president and director of the Wealth Planning Center for Citigroup Global Wealth Advisory Service, Mpls.

Gail Chang Bohr received a Child Advocacy Award from the American Bar Association Young Lawyers Division in conjunction with the Center on Children and the Law.

Michael A. Bryant was elected vice president, Minnesota Association for Justice.

Lauris A. Heyerdahl joined Foley & Mansfi eld, Mpls., as an associate.

Barry A. O’Neil was elected to the board of directors of Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, Mpls.

1992Mark A. Cangemi joined Igbanugo Partners International Law Firm, Mpls., as partner.

Nauni J. Manty joined Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon and Vogt, Mpls.

Heidi Pederson Donahe joined The Octavus Group, Excelsior, Minn., as senior vice president.

David A. Schooler joined Briggs and Morgan, Mpls., as a shareholder in the labor and employment law section.

1993Robert O. Blatti Jr. opened Lakes Area Center in Battle Lake, Minn., focusing on family litigation and mediation, Social Security, disability, and general litigation.

David A. Bonello is the Upper Midwest Pension Rights Project manager, Minnesota Senior Federation.

Kevin G. Cedergren was promoted to manager, Juvenile Division, Carver County (Minn.) Attorney’s Offi ce.

Dyan J. Ebert was appointed chief executive offi cer of Quinlivan & Hughes, St. Cloud, Minn.

Attend reception for Chief Justice Eric Magnuson ’76 June 24

Join us in celebrating the appointment of Eric Magnuson ’76 as chief justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court. William Mitchell will host a special reception for Chief Justice Magnuson on Tuesday, June 24, with Mitchell alumni, faculty, staff, and students and members of the local legal community from 5 to 7 p.m. in the Auditorium. Please register online at www.wmitchell.edu/rsvp.

Mitchell on Law

Michael R. Nixt was appointed to the board of directors, Moss & Barnett, Mpls.

Christine A. Van Tassel joined Hitesman & Associates, Maple Grove, Minn.

Daniel A. Yarano, was appointed to the Community Based Energy Development Advisory Task Force, which promotes locally owned renewable energy production facilities.

1994Gregg A. Engler, 82nd Airborne Division, is deployed in Iraq.

Jennifer M. O’Brien joined Halleland, Lewis, Nilan & Johnson, Mpls., as a shareholder in the health law group and director of compliance services for the law fi rm’s subsidiary, Halleland Health Consulting.

Damon E. Schram was named vice president, general counsel, and secretary, Lakes Entertainment, Minnetonka, Minn.

Teresa M. Thompson was elected shareholder, Fredrikson & Byron, Mpls.

1995Michael J. Case, Zionsville, Ind., was promoted to vice president of claims and is on the board of directors of Protective Insurance Company.

1996Yvonne M. Flaherty was named partner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Mpls.

R. Todd Franks joined Moss & Barnett, Mpls.

Kevin R. Lewis joined Foley & Mansfi eld, Mpls., as an associate.

Hassan M. Saffouri joined Faegre & Benson, Mpls., as staff attorney, immigration practice.

Brian H. Sande joined Bassford Remele, Mpls., as shareholder focusing on insurance coverage and commercial litigation.

Douglas P. Spanier and his wife, Krista, announce the arrival of Sean Caiden Paul Spanier on Nov. 1, 2007, and note he is getting along well with his brother, Samuel, 2.

1997Kalene M. Engel is coordinator, Winona County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council.

Michael R. Holt, Miami, Fla., published “Parallel Proceedings in Florida’s State and Federal Courts: Fifth Amendment Considerations” in The Florida Bar Journal, Vol. 82, No. 1, Jan. 2008.

Steven J. Ledin opened Blaney & Ledin, Oakdale, Minn., practicing in corporate and business transactional law.

John D. Magnuson joined Magnuson Law Firm, Stillwater, Minn.

William D. Siegel was voted shareholder, Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Mpls.

Thomas F. Steichen was elected shareholder, Fredrikson & Byron, Mpls.

Jennifer Suich Frank and husband Marlin Frank had their second child, son Noah Alan Frank, on Nov. 7, 2006. She is in-house employment law counsel for Allina Hospitals & Clinics, Mpls.

Class Notes

27

John L. Fossum ’93 spent nine months in Afghanistan teaching Afghan police and prosecutors about criminal law, procedures, and provisions in the country’s 2004 constitution as part of the Justice Sector Support Program, funded by the U.S. State Department. “Afghans are not accustomed to consulting law books, and often do not have them available in their offi ces,” Fossum said. “All of our students were provided with a complete set of law books.” Fossum is in private practice in Northfi eld, Minn., and is admitted to practice in the International Criminal Court, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.

Spring 2008 Read the magazine online @ www.wmitchell.edu/alumni

1998Kristi L. Angus joined ShoreMaster, Fergus Falls, Minn., as a contract administrator.

Kristin M. Boylan became partner at Merchant & Gould, Mpls.

Susanne J. Fischer joined Moss & Barnett, Mpls.

Denise S. Fullerton opened Fullerton Law, Roseville, Minn., focusing on personal injury and wrongful death cases involving dram shop and commercial vehicles.

Charles S. Gerlach was selected as a National College of District Attorneys faculty member at the National Advocacy Center and is a juvenile prosecutor in the Hennepin County Attorney’s Offi ce.

Brian R. McDaniel joined the government relations team at Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Mpls.

Jeffrey M. Montpetit was named partner at Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum & Carey, Mpls.

Tong Wu is partner at Merchant & Gould, Mpls.

1999Maj. William J. Annexstad was honored as the American Bar Association, Young Lawyers Division, Outstanding Young Lawyer of the Year for 2006-07. Jim is an instructor in the Operations and International Law Division at the Judge Advocate General’s School at Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala.

Daniel R. Donovan joined Faegre & Benson, Mpls., as special counsel in the wealth management practice.

Todd M. Gillette joined Schauer Law Offi ce, Winthrop, Minn.

Kathryn S. Hahne was named a partner at Faegre & Benson, Mpls. She is part of the government relations team.

Adam P. Jensen, director of compliance for Virchow Krause Employee Benefi ts, Madison, Wis., was elected 2008 president of the Madison Chapter of the International Society of Employee Benefi ts Specialists.

Christopher D. Johnson was elected chairman, Forest Lake (Minn.) Area Chamber of Commerce.

Kathleen M. Loucks joined Hellmuth & Johnson, Eden Prairie, Minn.

Daniel G. Queenan was promoted to executive vice president of Opus North Corp., Chicago.

Amy J. Reed-Hall was appointed chief deputy county attorney, Isanti County (Minn.) Attorney’s Offi ce.

Richard J. Savelkoul was named shareholder of Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, Mpls.

Daniel J. Van Loh opened Deckert & Van Loh, Maple Grove, Minn., practicing in family law, mediation, and general litigation.

2000Cindy J. Ackerman was named shareholder of Moss & Barnett, Mpls.

Thomas R. Bennerotte opened Bennerotte & Associates, St. Paul, in December 2007.

Anthony A. Dorland was named shareholder of Moss & Barnett, Mpls.

Elizabeth A. Emerson joined Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Mpls., as a lobbyist.

Michele R. Fisher was named partner at Nichols Kaster & Anderson, Mpls.

Sean J. Mickelson was named partner at Terhaar, Archibald, Pfefferle & Griebel, Mpls.

Alison J. Midden was named shareholder of Briggs and Morgan, Mpls.

Matthew H. Morgan joined Nichols Kaster & Anderson, Mpls., as an associate.

Elizabeth A. Papacek was elected shareholder of Leonard, Street and Deinard, Mpls.

Kimberly A. Small joined the Illinois Association of School Boards’ Offi ce of the General Counsel as assistant general counsel.

J. Richard Soderberg was named principal at Fish & Richardson, Mpls., practicing in patent prosecution and counseling clients on computer system and network issues.

Bradley J. Thorson was named partner at Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, Mpls.

Damien F. Toven joined the Princeton (Minn.) Area Chamber of Commerce board of directors.

Scott J. Ulbrich was named partner at Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, Mpls.

2001Darla Jo Boggs joined the Minneapolis City Attorney’s Offi ce as an assistant city attorney.

J. Kevin Kirchner joined Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, Mpls., as an associate representing insurance companies

and individuals in no-fault, construction defect, and general civil litigation.

Class Notes

28 Mitchell on Law

Class Notes

29

Alum helps Central High School mock trial team reach state competition for fi rst time

litigation attorney at Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug & Bradt, St. Paul, has coached the St. Paul Central

High School mock trial team for the past four years. Students competed in the state tournament last

year for the fi rst time in school history and this

successful mock trial competitor at Mitchell, says the competition helps students gain confi dence and

keeps her courtroom skills fresh.

Melanie J. Leth is a partner at Weber and Leth, Kasson, Minn.

Joseph G. Sedarski joined Fredrikson & Byron, Mpls., as an associate.

Mark L. Vavreck joined Scrimshire, Martineau, Gonko & Vavreck, Mpls.

Justin P. Weinberg joined Gislason & Hunter, New Ulm, Minn.

2002Julie L. Boehmke was elected shareholder of Gray Plant Mooty, Mpls.

Carrie A. Daniel joined Graco Inc., Mpls., as corporate and litigation counsel.

Karen K. Hatfi eld became general partner of Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug & Bradt, St. Paul.

Sarah B. Helwig joined Rudy, Gassert, Yetka & Pritchett, Cloquet, Minn., as an associate in family law and probate.

Erica L. (Thompson) Roettger and her husband, Philip, celebrated the birth of their second child, Amelia Marie, on March 30, 2007. She joins brother, Luke.

Ugo A. Ukabam was elected partner in the labor and employment law group, Gray Plant Mooty, Mpls.

2003Mark D. Belinske was named associate general counsel of Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, Mpls.

Joshua D. Christensen joined Anastasi & Associates, Stillwater, Minn., as an associate.

Sara R. Grewing was named chief of staff for St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman.

Zachary A. Kretchmer joined Niemi, Barr & Jerabek, Mpls., as a senior associate in family law.

Robin Moulin Radke and her husband, Rich Radke, welcomed Clara Elizabeth in July 2007. Clara joins big sister, Ann Louise.

Jennifer M. Spalding joined Gregerson, Rosow, Johnson & Nilan, Mpls., as a municipal prosecutor.

Eric H. Warner is executive vice president at Winona Abstract Company, Winona, Minn.

2004Jodi (Lindor) Asmus married Aaron Asmus on Dec. 1, 2007 and is clerking for Judge Ann L. Carrott in Douglas County, Minn.

Timothy J. Carrigan joined Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, Mpls., as an associate.

Isaac L. Hammer and Karen L. (Tibert) Hammer welcomed their fi rst son, Tate William, on Sept. 18, 2007. Isaac and Karen are associate attorneys at Suttell & Associates, Bellevue, Wash.

Matthew H. Hanka joined Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, Duluth, Minn., as an associate.

Jessica (Norman) Hafemeyer opened Ibeling Hafemeyer in Faribault, Minn., on Aug. 1, 2007. The fi rm focuses on family, bankruptcy, will, and probate law.

Stephen J. Knudsen joined Velde Law Firm, Alexandria, Minn.

Barbara M. Kristiansson joined Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, Mpls.

Dehlia C. Seim joined Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, Duluth, Minn., as an associate.

2005C. Blair Buccicone and Virginia Cronin opened Cronin & Buccicone on Nov. 1, 2007 in St. Paul. Practice areas include criminal law, family law, probate law, and general litigation.

Jeff N. Davidman joined the government relations practice at Best & Flanagan, Mpls. He will work on transportation, transit, public safety, and general business issues.

Spring 2008 Read the magazine online @ www.wmitchell.edu/alumni

Stacey Sorensen ’06 (front row, far right), a civil

year placed seventh out of 12 teams. Sorensen, a

30

Class Notes

Keep Us Posted: Send your Class Notes updates to magazine@wmitchell.edu or fi ll out the online form at www.wmitchell.edu/alumni. You can also fax (651) 290-7502, call (651) 290-6370, or mail your updates to Mitchell on Law, 875 Summit Ave., St. Paul, MN 55105. We (and your classmates) look forward to hearing from you!

Luke E. Enno joined Skjold Barthel, Mpls., as an associate practicing in estate planning and real estate.

Michael Freiberg was re-elected to a second term on the Golden Valley (Minn.) City Council.

Julie A. Oster joined Melinda Weerts Law, Fargo, N.D., as an associate attorney.

Patrick J. Swift is assistant county attorney, Waseca (Minn.) County Attorney’s Offi ce.

John Wendland and Melissa (Milbert) Wendland announce the birth of their son, John “Jack” Matthew, on Oct. 9, 2007 in Mpls. Melissa is an associate at Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Mpls. John is associate general counsel at the Minnesota Credit Union Network.

2006D. Scott Aberson joined the litigation group of Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, Mpls.

Amelia N. Jadoo joined Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Mpls., as an associate in business litigation.

Eileen C. Krenner joined Lucas Family Law, St. Paul, as an associate.

Charles P. Marabella joined Merchant & Gould, Mpls., as an associate.

Travis J. Smith joined the Nobles County (Minn.) Attorney’s Offi ce as assistant county attorney.

Sarah M. Stensland joined the intellectual property section of Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist, Mpls.

Lynn M. Stoneburner joined Stoneburner Law Offi ce, Paynesville, Minn.

2007Christina K. Brusven, Fredrikson & Byron, Mpls., received the Midwest Energy Effi ciency Alliance’s Inspiring Effi ciency Leadership Award.

Ryan M. Check joined Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Mpls., as an associate on the corporate fi nance and transactions team.

Jianguang Du joined Fish & Richardson, Mpls., as an associate in the fi rm’s patent prosecution group.

Michael K. Gravink joined Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Mpls., as an associate in business litigation.

Robert M. Hirning joined Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Mpls., as an associate on the intellectual property team.

Melissa J. Houghtaling joined Heltzer & Burg, Mpls., as an associate practicing in estate planning, probate, and business law.

Krystal R. Pierce is a part-time assistant Nicollet County Attorney and a full-time associate attorney with MacKenzie & Gustafson, St. Peter, Minn.

Gretchen K. Seymour joined Foley & Mansfi eld, Mpls., as an associate in construction law.

Rebecca G. Sluss joined Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Mpls., as an associate on the commercial fi nance and real estate team.

Ryan C. Sorge joined Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, Mpls., as an associate practicing in automobile law.

Jonathan H. Stechmann joined Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Mpls., as an associate on the corporate fi nance and transactions team.

Uyen N. Tang joined Christie, Parker & Hale, Pasadena, Calif., as an associate.

Susan J. Thoresen joined Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Mpls., as an associate on the employee benefi ts team.

Jillian N. Walker joined Messerli & Kraemer, Mpls.

Mitchell on Law

1936Robert E. Zeck (Minneapolis College of Law), 94, Horseshoe Bend, Ark., died Feb. 21. Practiced in Minnesota until retiring in 1978. Survived by wife, Louise; children Barbara Ann, Janice Carol, Kathleen Mary, Jeanne Marie, Gerald, and Gregory.

1939Donald F. Eggleston (Minnesota College of Law), 92, Mpls., died Nov. 9, 2007. Spent career in trust department of Chase Manhattan Bank. Preceded in death by wife of 58 years, Margaret.

1948Lee M. Berlin (St. Paul College of Law), 86, Virginia, Minn., died Feb. 9. Vice president, 3M Company, and chairman, LecTec Corporation. Founder, Minnesota Medical Alley; chairman, Minnesota District Export Council; director, Minnesota World Trade Center. Survived by wife, Helen; son, Judd.

1952Robert C. Runchey (St. Paul College of Law), 80, Marshall, Minn., died Sept. 30, 2007. Lyon County Attorney, 1958-70. Retired in 1996 from private practice. Survived by wife, Ardella; children and stepchildren JoAnn, Barbara ’80, Catherine, Michael, Richard, Jane, Susan, Sara ’96, Sharon, Maureen, Terry, and Janell.

1953William C. Ball (Minneapolis-Minnesota College of Law), 91, Mpls., died Sept. 10, 2007.

Anthony M. Barich (Minneapolis-Minnesota College of Law), 81, St. Cloud, Minn., died June 1, 2007.

1956Charles “Chuck” Olson (St. Paul College of Law), 79, Roseville, Minn., died July 8, 2007. Retired after 30 years with Speeter, Johnson, Hautman and Olson. Survived by wife, Estelle; children Edward ’83, Mary Beth, and Judy.

1959Hon. John Moonan, 79, Mankato, Minn., died Dec. 19, 2007. Practiced law with Charles and Gus Johnson prior to serving as a Blue Earth County district judge until retiring in 1998.

1965Emmett Dowdal, 72, Birchwood, Minn., died Feb. 23. Trial lawyer for more than 40 years; practiced with daughter Bridgid Dowdal, William Mitchell assistant dean for career and professional development. Survived by wife, Barbara; children Mullen, Bridgid, and Megan.

1967Bruce L. Anderson, 67, Two Harbors, Minn., died Dec. 4, 2007. Lake County attorney, 1975-02. Survived by wife, Sharon; children and stepchildren Morgan, Kelly, Craig, and Dale.

1968Hugh V. Plunkett III, 65, Mpls., died Oct. 15, 2007. Practiced in product liability, commercial lending, securities, antitrust, and insurance law. President, Mower County and Tenth District Bar Associations; MSBA Board of Governors; chairman, Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating Council. Survived by wife, Mary; children Tara and Sean.

1971Phillip S. Resnick, 63, Mpls., died Feb. 19. Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Distinguished Service Award, posthumously. Survived by wife, Kandy; children and stepchildren Allison, David, Lauren, and Briana.

1977Carl E. Norberg, 68, St. Paul, died May 16, 2007.

Mark H. Stromwall, 61, Bayport, Minn., died Aug. 7, 2007. Owner, Dakota Home Appraisals. Survived by daughter, Amy.

1986David L. Ferguson, 68, Reno, Nev., died Oct. 25, 2007. Survived by wife, Edie; children Robert and Heather.

1994Charles O. Amdahl, 44, Mpls., died Jan. 11. Practiced criminal defense law; Hennepin County District Court clerk; taught English in Taipei, Taiwan. Survived by father Justice Douglas Amdahl ’51; sister, Faith ’91.

1999John J. Curi, 40, Eagan, Minn., died Jan. 13.

Peter C. Saari, 39, Mpls., died Dec. 17, 2007. Survived by children Eleanor and Calder.

2004Owen M. Waxman, 32, St. Louis Park, Minn., died Sept. 15, 2007. Survived by wife, Stacey; children Eli and Avi.

31

Obituaries

Spring 2008

Mitchell on Law32

To the PointMessage from the Dean

President and Dean Eric S. Janus

Value the Difference

In April, I was formally installed as president and dean

of William Mitchell College of Law in an event that

included faculty, alumni, leaders of the judiciary, law

fi rms, public interest organizations, and representatives

from our sister law schools in the Twin Cities. I felt

humbled by all the attention and honored by the

people present.

What struck me that evening was the visible impact

Mitchell has had on the legal community. Mitchell

alumni, Mitchell adjuncts, Mitchell supporters, and

leaders of the judiciary, many of whom told stories at

the reception afterward—stories about their careers,

their mentors, leaders before them—that often began

with the phrase “If not for Mitchell….”

As I said in my remarks, Mitchell’s know-how, our

reputation, our culture, and our mission have all been

built incrementally, brick by brick, course by course,

year by year—by people who believe in and value

the difference Mitchell has made and will continue

to make to this community. I commit that I will do

everything in my power to pass this law school along

more vibrant, more engaged, and more diverse.

Very Truly Yours,

Eric S. Janus President and Dean

To read speaker remarks from the installation and to view photos and video, go to

www.wmitchell.edu/installation.

Photo by Tim Rum

melhoff

Photo by Tim Rum

melhoff

www.wmitchell.edu

Events at Mitchell

Pictured left: Alumni, adjuncts, and students who have contributed to the Immigration Law Clinic’s 25 years of success were recognized at a reception during the 2008 Upper Midwest Immigration Conference. Pictured right: The American Immigration Lawyers Association Minnesota/Dakotas Chapter honored co-founders H. Sam Myers and the late Bernie Becker, and Paula Duthoy ’90, who has been the supervising adjunct professor for 10 years.

Immigration Law Clinic at William Mitchell Celebrates 25 Years | May 1, 2008

Pictured left: Judge Betsy Hoene Martin‘80 at the podium. Pictured middle: Tea committee members (back row left to right) Heather

Marie Ruzek ’01, Imani Jaafar-Mohammad ‘04. Pictured left: Kelley Malone O'Neill ‘88 and Justice Esther Tomljanovich ‘55.

Women in Law Tea 2008 | April 18, 2008

Mitchell students and attorneys participated in a massive effort to highlight the importance of advance healthcare decision-making. More than 100 people filled out health care directives at the day-long event sponsored by the college’s Elder Law and Estate Planning Society, Center for Elder Justice & Policy and the Minnesota Justice Foundation.

National Healthcare Decisions Day | April 16, 2008 Vulnerable Adults Task Force meets at Mitchell as part of the

Elder Justice & Policy InstituteApril 18, 2008

Key stakeholders met at William Mitchell to analyze the current Vulnerable Adult Act in Minnesota.Pictured left: Jennifer Kirchen and Kris Lohrke, DHS.

Orbovich.

Diersen ’08, Vanessa Rybicka ’04, Patricia Butler ‘07, Kathy Kimmel ’96, Carolyn Chalmers. (Front row) Ani Hartzheim ‘04, Sue Laine ’79,

Pictured right: Attorneys Randy Snyder, Victor Smith ‘88, and Sam

875 Summit AvenueSt. Paul, MN 55105-3076

Nonprofit Org.U.S. Postage

PAIDSt. Paul, MN

Permit No. 1300

Mark Your Calendar

Reception for Chief Justice Eric Magnuson '76June 24, 2008 | 5–7 pmRegister at www.wmitchell.edu/rsvp