mit

68
Friday May 3, 2013 Lean Manufacturing's Unexpected Windfall: A Lower Carbon Footprint Charles M. Cohon www.cohon.com

Upload: charles-cohon

Post on 22-Dec-2014

172 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MIT

Friday May 3, 2013

Lean Manufacturing's Unexpected

Windfall: A Lower Carbon Footprint

Charles M. Cohon www.cohon.com

Page 2: MIT

2

�Make my company more profitable.

�Help my company meet competitive threats.

�Achieve sustainablecompetitive advantage

Lean usually is a way to:

Page 3: MIT

3

�Make my company more profitable.

�Help my company meet competitive threats.

�Achieve sustainablecompetitive advantage

But not for today!

Page 4: MIT

4

Today Lean is a way to:

�Reduce my company’scarbon footprint.

�Reduce my industry’scarbon footprint.

Page 5: MIT

5

Page 129

Page 6: MIT

6

“Consider the waste of overproduction, for example. It is not an exaggeration to say that in a low-growth period such waste is a crime against society more than a business loss.”

Page 7: MIT

7

Agenda

�FNGP Seal & Gasket recast from Lean Manufacturing to Green Manufacturing

Page 8: MIT

8

�Transition from Batch & Queue to Single Piece Flow

Agenda

Page 9: MIT

9

�Reduce my company’scarbon footprint?

�Reduce my industry’scarbon footprint?

What are the traditional ways to:

Page 10: MIT

10

�Commuting�HVAC systems�Industrial processes (ovens to fork lift trucks)

Atmospheric emissions

Page 11: MIT

11

�Duplicated servicesTwo airlines that fly halffull planes from O’Hareto Wichita may decide to code-share.

Atmospheric emissions

Page 12: MIT

12

�Sewage�Industrial processes�Underutilized plating operations may be consolidated.

Wastewater emissions

Page 13: MIT

13

�From lights and HVAC�From industrial processes

�A lean manufacturer can speed the exit of high-consuming operations.

Power Gen. Emissions

Page 14: MIT

14

FNGP (seal & gasket mfr.) Ligonier, Indiana

12002300Feet2 utilized

60055Units/worker/mo.

321Workers

Mo. 40

1,800Mo. 1

1,155

Source:Lean Thinking,Womack and Jones

Page 15: MIT

15

2300 230012002300Feet2

55 5560055Units/

wkr./mo.

21 21321Workers

Mo. 11,155

Mo. 401,155

Mo.401,800

Mo. 11,155

Not Green Company

Green Company

Page 16: MIT

16

Feet2

Units/wkr./mo.

213Workers

Mo. 40Mo.40

Not Green Company

Green Company

Page 17: MIT

17

How does this reduce the Lean Company’s

carbon footprint?

Page 18: MIT

18

�Commuting

Atmospheric emissions

Page 19: MIT

19

�Sewage

Wastewater emissions

Page 20: MIT

20

2300 230012002300Feet2

55 5560055Units/

wkr./mo.

21 21321Workers

Mo. 11,155

Mo. 401,155

Mo.401,800

Mo. 11,155

Not Green Company

Green Company

Page 21: MIT

21

23001200Feet2

Units/wkr./mo.

Workers

Not Green Company

Green Company

Page 22: MIT

22

How does this reduce the Lean Company’s

carbon footprint?

Page 23: MIT

23

�HVAC systems

Atmospheric emissions

Page 24: MIT

24

�From lights and HVAC

Power Gen. Emissions

Page 25: MIT

25

2300 230012002300Feet2

55 5560055Units/

wkr./mo.

21 21321Workers

Mo. 11,155

Mo. 401,155

Mo.401,800

Mo. 11,155

Not Green Company

Green Company

Page 26: MIT

26

Feet2

600Units/

wkr./mo.

+2Workers

Mo. 401,200

Not Green Company

Green Company

Page 27: MIT

27

2300 230012002300Feet2

55 5560055Units/

wkr./mo.

21 21321Workers

Mo. 11,155

Mo. 401,155

Mo.401,800

Mo. 11,155

Not Green Company

Green Company

Page 28: MIT

120028

Feet2

Units/wkr./mo.

Workers

Not Green Company

Green Company

2300 1200+800

33+2

2000

Page 29: MIT

Green Company

29

23002000Feet2

55600Units/

wkr./mo.

213+2Workers

Mo. 401,155

Mo.401,800

Not Green Company

Page 30: MIT

30

How does this reduce the this industry’s

carbon footprint?

Page 31: MIT

31

�Commuting�HVAC systems�Industrial processes (ovens to fork lift trucks)

Atmospheric emissions

Page 32: MIT

32

�Sewage�Industrial processes

Wastewater emissions

Page 33: MIT

33

�From lights and HVAC�From industrial processes

Power Gen. Emissions

Page 34: MIT

34

The Lean Manufacturer accelerated the exit of a

high-consuming operation

Page 35: MIT

35

Batch & Queue

Page 36: MIT

36

V C W P

Page 37: MIT

37

V C W P

Page 38: MIT

38

V C W P

Page 39: MIT

39

V C W P

Productive Work

Page 40: MIT

40Unproductive Work

Raw Material Work In Process (WIP) Finished

Goods

Excess Carbon Footprint

Page 41: MIT

41

Excess Carbon Footprint

�Early/unneeded emissions

�Damage to inventory

�Repair & scrap costs

�Complex mfg. requires MRP and/or ERP

�Bar codes and/or RFID

�Data center costs

Page 42: MIT

42

�Obsolescence

�Rust and dust

�Warehouse, racks, warehouse personnel, fork lift trucks, etc.

Excess Carbon Footprint

Page 43: MIT

43

�Intermittently defective work can be hidden by excess inventory.

Excess Carbon Footprint

Page 44: MIT

44

V C W P

Page 45: MIT

45

V C W P

Page 46: MIT

46

�Defects repeated across an entire batch.

Excess Carbon Footprint

Page 47: MIT

47

V C W P

Page 48: MIT

48

V C W P

Page 49: MIT

49

Single Piece Flow

Page 50: MIT

50

V C W P

Single Piece Flow

Page 51: MIT

51

V C W P

Single Piece Flow

Page 52: MIT

52

V C W

Single Piece Flow

P

Page 53: MIT

53

V C

Single Piece Flow

PW

Page 54: MIT

54

V

Single Piece Flow

PWC

Page 55: MIT

55

Single Piece Flow

PWCV

Page 56: MIT

56

PWCV

Preventing Defective Batches

Page 57: MIT

57

PWCV

Preventing Defective Batches

Page 58: MIT

58

WCV P

Preventing Defective Batches

Page 59: MIT

59

CV PW

Preventing Defective Batches

Page 60: MIT

60

V PW

Preventing Defective Batches

C

Page 61: MIT

61

We never have the time to do it ________ but we always find time to do it ________

Page 62: MIT

62

“We have a large salvage department, which apparently earns us twenty or more million dollars a year…But as that department grew and became more important and more strikingly valuable, we began to ask ourselves:‘Why should we have so much to salvage? Are we not giving more attention to reclaiming than not wasting?…’ ”

Page 63: MIT

63

“…Our studies and investigations to date have resulted in the savings of 80,000,000 pounds of steel a year that formerly went into scrap and had to be reworked with the expenditure of labor…of upward of two thousand men.”

1926

Page 64: MIT

64

Henry FordToday and Tomorrow, 1926

page 98

Page 65: MIT

65

The Drill vs. The Hole

Page 66: MIT

66

The Hole: Lower Carbon Footprint

The Drill: Lean Thinking

Page 67: MIT

67

2300 230012002300Feet2

55 5560055Units/

wkr./mo.

21 21321Workers

Mo. 11,155

Mo. 401,155

Mo.401,800

Mo. 11,155

Not Green Company

Green Company

Page 68: MIT

Friday May 3, 2013

Lean Manufacturing's Unexpected

Windfall: A Lower Carbon Footprint

Charles M. Cohon www.cohon.com