mise au point/in-depth review circulating micrornas ... · stability in body fluids, mirnas have...

7
INTRODUCTION In 1993, the first microRNA (miRNA), a new class of noncoding RNA molecules, was discovered while study- ing the temporal regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans development. These RNA products were shown to have an antisense complementarity to multiple sites in the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of mRNA (lin-14) leading to the inhibition of their translation and to a decrease in the amount of their protein product (LIN-14) [1,2]. Seven years later, miRNA let-7 was discovered in C. elegans [3] with its gene conserved throughout several species and most importantly in humans [4]; thus triggering an interest in the field of microRNA research. miRNA, a large family of small RNA molecules approximately 18-25 nucleotides in length, has been newly established as important post-transcriptional gene regulators [5]. It is estimated that miRNAs regulate around sixty percent of all protein coding mammalian genes [5]. Currently, 1872 precursors and 2578 mature miRNAs [mirbase.org] are identified in humans and vary in their expression in a tissue-specific or developmental- stage-specific manner [5]. Changes in miRNA expres- sion have been implicated in many pathologies including cancer [6]. Remarkably, specific miRNAs can be dys- regulated in certain cancers and not in others, or vary in the pattern of their dysregulation between cancers (i.e. up-regulation or down-regulation) [7]. Interestingly, these changes can be detected not only at the tissue level but also in body fluids and accordingly the role of miRNAs as potential diagnostic and prognostic bio- markers in many cancer types has recently emerged. miRNA BIOGENESIS AND FUNCTION The precursors of miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) can be gener- ated in two distinct pathways (Fig.1). The first pathway, known as the canonical pathway, involves the transcrip- tion of long primary RNA sequences called pri-miRNAs from independent genes via RNA polymerase-II [5]. pri- miRNAs fold into a hairpin and are spliced by the com- plex Drosha (RNase-III family member) into a ~70 nucleotide hairpin known as pre-miRNA. The second pathway for pre-miRNA biogenesis is known as the mirtron pathway that involves the direct generation of pre-miRNA from introns of protein coding genes by- passing Drosha via Spliceosomes [5]. The pre-miRNAs 116 Lebanese Medical Journal 2016 • Volume 64 (2) MISE AU POINT / IN-DEPTH REVIEW CIRCULATING microRNAs: POTENTIAL BIOMARKERS IN CANCER DETECTION, DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS http://www.lebanesemedicaljournal.org/articles/64-2/review2.pdf Nader MAKAREM 1* , Ahmad MOURAD 1* , Farah J. NASSAR 2 , Rihab NASR 1 Makarem N, Mourad A, Nassar FJ, Nasr R. Circulating micro- RNAs : Potential biomarkers in cancer detection, diagnosis and prognosis. J Med Liban 2016 ; 64 (2) : 116-122. Makarem N, Mourad A, Nassar FJ, Nasr R. Les microARN cir- culants : biomarqueurs potentiels pour la détection, le diagnostic et le pronostic du cancer. J Med Liban 2016 ; 64 (2) : 116-122. 1 Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, (AUB), Beirut, Lebanon. * Co-first authors. 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, AUB. Correspondence to: Rihab Nasr, PhD. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A large family of small 18-25 nucleotide long non coding RNA molecules now known as microRNA (miRNA) was described two decades ago, and has been recently es- tablished as post-transcriptional gene regulators. miRNAs were shown to be involved in the regulation of diverse phys- iological and developmental processes. Moreover, dysregula- tion of specific miRNAs has been implicated later in several pathologies including cancer. Owing to their presence and stability in body fluids, miRNAs have been investigated as novel circulating non-invasive biomarkers. Accordingly, their role as potential diagnostic, prognostic or predictive biomark- ers for many cancer types has recently emerged. This review tackles the use of circulating miRNAs in cancer detection, diagnosis and prognosis, giving examples using common solid tumors and discussing the advantages of their use, the challenges facing this novel circulating biomarker and recom- mendations to overcome them. Keywords: microRNA, cancer, biomarker, prognosis, diagnosis RÉSUMÉ Les microARN (miARNs), découverts il y a deux décennies, forment une grande famille de petites molécules d’ARNs non codants de 18 à 25 nucléotides de longueur. Récemment, plusieurs recherches ont prouvé que les miARNs sont des régulateurs post-transcriptionnels de gènes impliqués dans la régulation du développement et de divers processus physiologiques. De plus, la dérégulation de certains miARNs semble être à l’origine de plusieurs pathologies, dont le cancer. En raison de leur présence et de leur stabilité dans des fluides corporels, les miARNs ont été étudiés en tant que biomarqueurs diagnostiques, pro- nostiques ou prédictifs non invasifs pour de nombreux types de cancer. Cet article aborde l’utilisation des miARNs cir- culants dans la détection, le diagnostic et le pronostic de certaines tumeurs solides et examine les avantages de leur utilisation, les défis auxquels ces nouveaux biomarqueurs circulants feront face et certaines recommandations pour les surmonter.

Upload: others

Post on 30-Apr-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MISE AU POINT/IN-DEPTH REVIEW CIRCULATING microRNAs ... · stability in body fluids, miRNAs have been investigated as novel circulating non-invasive biomarkers. Accordingly, their

INTRODUCTION

In 1993, the first microRNA (miRNA), a new class ofnoncoding RNA molecules, was discovered while study-ing the temporal regulation of Caenorhabditis elegansdevelopment. These RNA products were shown to havean antisense complementarity to multiple sites in the 3’untranslated region (UTR) of mRNA (lin-14) leading tothe inhibition of their translation and to a decrease in theamount of their protein product (LIN-14) [1,2]. Sevenyears later, miRNA let-7 was discovered in C. elegans[3] with its gene conserved throughout several speciesand most importantly in humans [4]; thus triggering aninterest in the field of microRNA research.

miRNA, a large family of small RNA moleculesapproximately 18-25 nucleotides in length, has beennewly established as important post-transcriptional generegulators [5]. It is estimated that miRNAs regulatearound sixty percent of all protein coding mammaliangenes [5]. Currently, 1872 precursors and 2578 mature

miRNAs [mirbase.org] are identified in humans and varyin their expression in a tissue-specific or developmental-stage-specific manner [5]. Changes in miRNA expres-sion have been implicated in many pathologies includingcancer [6]. Remarkably, specific miRNAs can be dys-regulated in certain cancers and not in others, or vary inthe pattern of their dysregulation between cancers (i.e.up-regulation or down-regulation) [7]. Interestingly,these changes can be detected not only at the tissue levelbut also in body fluids and accordingly the role ofmiRNAs as potential diagnostic and prognostic bio-markers in many cancer types has recently emerged.

miRNA BIOGENESIS AND FUNCTION

The precursors of miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) can be gener-ated in two distinct pathways (Fig.1). The first pathway,known as the canonical pathway, involves the transcrip-tion of long primary RNA sequences called pri-miRNAsfrom independent genes via RNA polymerase-II [5]. pri-miRNAs fold into a hairpin and are spliced by the com-plex Drosha (RNase-III family member) into a ~70nucleotide hairpin known as pre-miRNA. The secondpathway for pre-miRNA biogenesis is known as themirtron pathway that involves the direct generation ofpre-miRNA from introns of protein coding genes by-passing Drosha via Spliceosomes [5]. The pre-miRNAs

116 Lebanese Medical Journal 2016 • Volume 64 (2)

MMIISSEE AAUU PPOOIINNTT// IINN--DDEEPPTTHH RREEVVIIEEWWCIRCULATING microRNAs: POTENTIAL BIOMARKERS IN CANCER DETECTION, DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIShttp://www.lebanesemedicaljournal.org/articles/64-2/review2.pdf

Nader MAKAREM1*, Ahmad MOURAD1*, Farah J. NASSAR2, Rihab NASR1

Makarem N, Mourad A, Nassar FJ, Nasr R. Circulating micro-RNAs: Potential biomarkers in cancer detection, diagnosis andprognosis. J Med Liban 2016 ; 64 (2) : 116-122.

Makarem N, Mourad A, Nassar FJ, Nasr R. Les microARN cir-culants : biomarqueurs potentiels pour la détection, le diagnosticet le pronostic du cancer. J Med Liban 2016 ; 64 (2) : 116-122.

1Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Facultyof Medicine, American University of Beirut, (AUB), Beirut,Lebanon.

*Co-first authors.2Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, AUB.

Correspondence to: Rihab Nasr, PhD.e-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT • A large family of small 18-25 nucleotide longnon coding RNA molecules now known as microRNA (miRNA)was described two decades ago, and has been recently es-tablished as post-transcriptional gene regulators. miRNAswere shown to be involved in the regulation of diverse phys-iological and developmental processes. Moreover, dysregula-tion of specific miRNAs has been implicated later in severalpathologies including cancer. Owing to their presence andstability in body fluids, miRNAs have been investigated asnovel circulating non-invasive biomarkers. Accordingly, theirrole as potential diagnostic, prognostic or predictive biomark-ers for many cancer types has recently emerged. This reviewtackles the use of circulating miRNAs in cancer detection,diagnosis and prognosis, giving examples using commonsolid tumors and discussing the advantages of their use, thechallenges facing this novel circulating biomarker and recom-mendations to overcome them.

Keywords: microRNA, cancer, biomarker, prognosis, diagnosis

RÉSUMÉ •Les microARN (miARNs), découverts il y a deuxdécennies, forment une grande famille de petites moléculesd’ARNs non codants de 18 à 25 nucléotides de longueur.Récemment, plusieurs recherches ont prouvé que lesmiARNs sont des régulateurs post-transcriptionnels degènes impliqués dans la régulation du développement et dedivers processus physiologiques. De plus, la dérégulationde certains miARNs semble être à l’origine de plusieurspathologies, dont le cancer. En raison de leur présence etde leur stabilité dans des fluides corporels, les miARNs ontété étudiés en tant que biomarqueurs diagnostiques, pro-nostiques ou prédictifs non invasifs pour de nombreux typesde cancer. Cet article aborde l’utilisation des miARNs cir-culants dans la détection, le diagnostic et le pronostic decertaines tumeurs solides et examine les avantages de leurutilisation, les défis auxquels ces nouveaux biomarqueurscirculants feront face et certaines recommandations pourles surmonter.

Page 2: MISE AU POINT/IN-DEPTH REVIEW CIRCULATING microRNAs ... · stability in body fluids, miRNAs have been investigated as novel circulating non-invasive biomarkers. Accordingly, their

N. MAKAREM et al. – Circulating microRNAs in cancer Lebanese Medical Journal 2016 • Volume 64 (2) 117

are then exported into the cytoplasm via Exportin 5 to befurther spliced by the complex Dicer (RNase-III familymember) into a ~20bp duplex, miRNA/miRNA*. Thethermodynamic stability of the strands determines whichone will be loaded into a final large functional proteincomplex called the miRNA-induced silencing complex(miRISC). The remaining passenger strand, miRNA*, isdegraded or released by the cell (in some cases it isloaded into another miRISC complex). Effective mRNAtargeting requires its continuous base pairing with theseed region (from nucleotides 2 to 8) of the miRNA inthe miRISC complex. Binding of miRISC to mRNAleads to either degradation of mRNA or prevention of itstranslation.

These post-transcriptional regulators were shown tobe involved in the regulation of not only diverse physio-logical and developmental processes but also of a vari-ety of diseases such as cancer.

miRNAs IN CANCER

A significant alteration exists in the miRNome (total cel-lular miRNA expression level) in malignant tissues ascompared to normal ones [8]. miRNAs can be classifiedas tumor suppressors or oncogenes depending on theirdownstream targets. Hence, the decrease in tumor sup-pressor miRNA would lead to the overexpression of itsoncogenic mRNA targets while an increase in oncogenicmiRNA would cause an inhibition of its tumor suppres-sive mRNA targets. This dysregulation in miRNA ex-pression could be due to the localization of its genes infragile chromosomal loci that can be amplified, deletedor mutated upon tumor development. Interestingly, thesepatterns of amplifications or deletions are tissue specificand can be traced back to their origin even after metasta-sis [6]. Moreover, overexpression or underexpression oftranscription factors and even defects in the biogenesis

FIGURE 1. Biogenesis of miRNATwo pathways exist for the biogenesis of miRNA. The first pathway, known as the canonical pathway involves specific miRNA codinggenes that are transcribed from DNA via RNA polymerase-II. After transcription, the primitive miRNA known as pri-miRNA is cleaved byDrosha into precursor miRNA, pre-miRNA. The second pathway, known as the non-canonical pathway or mirtron pathway, involvesgeneration of pre-miRNA from introns via the spliceosome acting on mRNA transcribed from independent genes not directly related tothe coding of miRNAs. Pre-miRNA is then exported into the cytoplasm and cleaved by Dicer into miRNA/miRNA* duplex formed of thestrand that will be loaded into the miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC) and a passenger strand. The passenger strand will bedegraded or may be itself loaded into another miRISC. The miRISC then proceeds to cleave mRNA resulting in repression of their trans-lation based on complementarity between the miRNA sequence in the complex and the mRNA in the cytoplasm.

Page 3: MISE AU POINT/IN-DEPTH REVIEW CIRCULATING microRNAs ... · stability in body fluids, miRNAs have been investigated as novel circulating non-invasive biomarkers. Accordingly, their

118 Lebanese Medical Journal 2016 • Volume 64 (2) N. MAKAREM et al. – Circulating microRNAs in cancer

machinery described previously can result in possiblemiRNA dysregulation. Finally, epigenetic changes, name-ly DNA methylation and histone modifications, can alsocause dysregulation of miRNA expression in cancer [9].

As stated previously, not only can miRNAs differen-tiate between normal and malignant tissues but they canalso specify the tumor origin as well as indicate its sub-type. Rosenfeld et al. have shown that specific miRNAsignatures can classify the tissue of origin in cancer withunknown primary origin [10]. miRNAs have also differ-ent expression profiles in basal breast cancer as com-pared to luminal breast cancer [11]. In fact, miRNA pro-filing was found to be superior to mRNA profiling forthe classification of breast cancer molecular subtypes[12]. Remarkably, miRNA expression can be altered inthe different stages of cancer from initiation, progression,migration, invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis and drugresistance, highlighting their potential clinical utility asdiagnostic, prognostic as well as predictive biomarkers.

miRNAsBIOMARKERS IN BODY FLUIDS

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines a bio-marker as “any substance, structure, or process that canbe measured in the body or its products and influence orpredict the incidence of outcome or disease” [13]. Anideal biomarker must fulfill several criteria which broad-ly include being specific, sensitive, predictive, robust,translatable and non-invasive [14]. Recently, owing totheir characteristics, miRNAs have been investigated asnovel potential circulating non-invasive biomarkers.

First, miRNAs have been reported in several biologi-cal fluids including blood plasma, serum, saliva, urine,breast milk, seminal plasma, tears, amniotic fluid, cere-brospinal fluid, peritoneal fluid, pleural fluid, bronchiallavage and colostrum [15]. Since most cancer diagnosisand potential treatment decisions rely on invasive histo-logical techniques, circulating miRNAs offer a uniqueadvantage of being acquired peripherally in a non-inva-sive manner such as a simple blood sample withdrawalor urine sample collection. Recently, Haj-Ahmad and hiscolleagues have detected two urinary miRNAs, miR-484and miR-1825 that can be used for prostate cancer diag-nosis among the benign prostatic hyperplasia patients [16].

Second, circulating miRNAs appear to be stable, sug-gesting that they must be protected against ribonucleasesthat degrade extracellular free RNAs. Intensive studieshave provided evidence that miRNAs can be secretedeither in microvesicles (exosomes and shedding vesicles),apoptotic bodies, high density lipoprotein (HDL) particlesor associated with Argonaute family of proteins [17] thatshield them from degradation [18]. Indeed, miRNAs inplasma/serum are resistant to degradation under harshconditions such as storage at room temperature for 24hours, repetitive freeze-thawing cycles or low/high pH[19]. Blood samples can even be stored for relatively longperiods of time, with little change in the total amount of

miRNAs in the sample, owing to their superior stabilitycompared to other RNAs such as mRNA [20]. Anotherkey advantage of miRNAs is their ease of detection.Circulating miRNAs can be quantified using microarray,deep sequencing or reverse transcription real time PCR(RT-qPCR). RT-qPCR is considered the most suitable userfriendly technique with high sensitivity and specificityeven though microarray and deep sequencing can make aglobal miRNA profile.

Circulating miRNAs could also potentially serve asdiagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in cancer. Fordiagnosis, circulating miRNAs can be used to identifyearly stage tumor and even monitor asymptomatic high-risk patients (Table I). For example, plasma miR-29a andmiR-92a were found to be dysregulated in both colorec-tal carcinoma (CRC) and advanced adenoma as com-pared to healthy controls, so that they could be used as adiagnostic marker for early CRC [21]. Moreover, thesignature of 34 miRNAs in serum can detect early stagenon-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with 80% over-all accuracy among asymptomatic high-risk patients [22].

miRNAs as prognostic markers can predict the overallsurvival of patients as well as the outcome, progressionand recurrence of the disease (Table I). For instance, arecent study in NSCLC has identified plasma miRNAs(miR-155-5p, miR-223-3p, miR-126-3p, miR-20a-5p,miR-152-3p, and miR-199a-5p) that can predict the re-currence of the disease as well as the survival of thepatients [23]. Plasma miR-141 in patients with colorectalcancer has been described as an indicator of distantmetastasis and poor prognosis [24]. Other miRNAs couldalso be used to detect cancer metastasis such as the po-tential use of circulating miR-373 and miR-10b for iden-tifying lymph node metastasis of breast cancer [25].miRNAs could also act as a predictive marker to help intreatment decisions and to monitor therapy resistance andsensitivity. For example, the upregulation of miR-125b inthe serum has been correlated with chemoresistance ofbreast cancer patients having neoadjuvant chemotherapyof 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide [26]as well as of NSCLC patients taking pre-operative cis-platin-based therapy [27]. All these properties of miRNAmake them a better biomarker as compared to otherssuch as circulating tumor cells whose isolation anddetection methods are still not well optimized, especial-ly that they are rare (one in a billion normal cells) andheterogeneous and they might not be released in all can-cer patients [28].

CIRCULATING miRNAs CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Several challenges face the use of miRNAs as circulatingnon-invasive biomarkers. Circulating miRNAs have aheterogeneous origin. Indeed, miRNAs could originatefrom blood cells, tumor cell secretions or lysis, inflamma-tory cells in the vicinity of tumor cells or organs involvedby tumor invasion or inflammation [29].

Page 4: MISE AU POINT/IN-DEPTH REVIEW CIRCULATING microRNAs ... · stability in body fluids, miRNAs have been investigated as novel circulating non-invasive biomarkers. Accordingly, their

TABLE I CIRCULATING miRNA AS DIAGNOSTIC, PROGNOSTIC OR PREDICTIVE OF COMMON SOLID TUMORS

Page 5: MISE AU POINT/IN-DEPTH REVIEW CIRCULATING microRNAs ... · stability in body fluids, miRNAs have been investigated as novel circulating non-invasive biomarkers. Accordingly, their

120 Lebanese Medical Journal 2016 • Volume 64 (2) N. MAKAREM et al. – Circulating microRNAs in cancer

A recent study has shown that out of 109 serummiRNAs dysregulated in renal cell carcinoma, only 36of those were upregulated in tumor tissue. This suggeststhat some but not all of miRNA biomarkers of canceractually originate from the tumor cells themselves [30].Thus, more studies should be conducted in order to showthe origin of dysregulated miRNAs in cancer.

Challenges are also faced in the process of miRNApreparation. This is mainly due to the absence of a stan-dardized protocol for detecting circulating miRNAs, fromspecimen collection to data analysis [31]. Sample extrac-tion and processing are very delicate steps that mightaffect the miRNA level. For instance, isolating the plasmafrom blood requires the addition of anticoagulants, eitherethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or citrate, andnot heparin which may interfere with the downstreamanalysis such as RT-qPCR [32]. Blood cells can contributemajorly to the miRNA level – up to 50-fold – so that thetime taken between sampling and processing as well asthe speed of centrifugation steps and aspirating plasmawithout touching the blood cell pellet must be optimized.An option is to choose miRNA biomarkers that are nothighly expressed by blood cells so that the results wouldreflect the cancer disease rather than the presence of bloodcells [33]. The fraction of blood in which miRNA levelswill be detected should be carefully selected. When com-paring serum and plasma, plasma was more recommend-ed due to the possible release of RNA in the serum duringthe stressful process of coagulation [34]. However, in arecent study, it was suggested that the choice of serum orplasma depends on the miRNA of interest and the pro-posed protocol [35].

Another challenge for miRNAs is the normalization ofthe samples when using RT-qPCR. There is no unifiedconsensus regarding what endogenous control should beused for normalization. Most studies use small nucleolarmiRNAs with a stable expression level such as RNU6B,RNU44, RNU48, and RNU47 or utilize other invariantmiRNAs like miR-16 and miR-223 [32].

However, there are instances where the internal con-trol used in specific tissues cannot be used in circulation.For example, RNU6B, which has been extensively usedfor the normalization of miRNAs in tissues, is not rec-ommended for data normalization in circulation since itcan be dysregulated in a disease specific manner such asin liver fibrosis [36]. For normalization, spiked-in syn-thetic miRNAs from C. elegans can also be added afterthe denaturing step of plasma and serum and used as aninternal control that can accommodate for alterations inefficiency of RNA recovery between samples [32].

Furthermore, miRNAs are differentially expressedbetween ethnic groups making an absolute baseline fordiagnosis and prognosis difficult to quantify. Hence, ele-vated or downregulated levels of a certain miRNA maynot have the same implications between different ethnicor population groups in terms of diagnosis, prognosis orpredictive value. For example, the prognostic value ofmiR-21, miR-181b, and miR-203 differed when assessing

paired normal and tumor colorectal archival tissues col-lected from 106 African American and 239 non-HispanicCaucasian colorectal cancer patients [37]. Similarly in theplasma of patients having NSCLC, African Americanshad a significant reduction in eight diagnostic miRNAs(let-7a, miR-17-5p, miR-27a, miR-29c, miR-146b, miR-106-a, miR-155, and miR-221) as compared to EuropeanAmericans [38]. We have recently reported that somemiRNAs, which were shown by many studies in the Westto be dysregulated in breast cancer, were not similarlyexpressed in Lebanese breast cancer patients [39].

Therefore, further studies need to address the issue ofcreating one unified database or list of aberrantly ex-pressed miRNAs which must be standardized to specificpopulations and ethnic groups as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Growing evidence suggests that circulating miRNAs pro-vide a specific, non-invasive and stable detection modelfor different types of cancer that can be a promising diag-nostic and prognostic tool. Even though their role as bio-markers is still being investigated extensively, miRNAshave not yet been clinically utilized. A standardized pro-tocol of the sample extraction to data analysis must beperformed in order to get universal reproducible resultsthat can be validated in large cohorts. Importantly, onemiRNA is not sufficient to be used as diagnostic or prog-nostic biomarker but rather a panel of dysregulated tumor-associated miRNA signatures must be chosen for thispurpose. Larger prospective trials should be conducted inorder to confirm their clinical role. A database that canaccumulate all the information about circulating miRNAsregarding their pattern of expression, cancer types, samplesources, method of detection and potential use as diag-nostic, prognostic and predictive marker can be formu-lated to be later used as reference for validation in a clini-cal setting. If well optimized, miRNAs in body fluids holdgreat potential in becoming a breakthrough tool for earlycancer detection and prognosis.

REFERENCES

1. Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans hete-rochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisensecomplementarity to lin-14. Cell 1993; 75 (5): 843-54.

2. Wightman B, Ha I, Ruvkun G. Posttranscriptional regu-lation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediatestemporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell 1993; 75(5): 855-62.

3. Reinhart BJ, Slack FJ, Basson M et al. The 21-nucleotidelet-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhab-ditis elegans. Nature 2000; 403 (6772): 901-6.

4. Pasquinelli AE, Reinhart BJ, Slack F et al. Conservationof the sequence and temporal expression of let-7 hetero-chronic regulatory RNA. Nature 2000; 408 (6808): 86-9.

5. Krol J, Loedige I, Filipowicz W. The widespread regula-tion of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. NatRev Genet 2010; 11 (9): 597-610.

6. Iorio MV, Croce CM. MicroRNA dysregulation in can-

Page 6: MISE AU POINT/IN-DEPTH REVIEW CIRCULATING microRNAs ... · stability in body fluids, miRNAs have been investigated as novel circulating non-invasive biomarkers. Accordingly, their

N. MAKAREM et al. – Circulating microRNAs in cancer Lebanese Medical Journal 2016 • Volume 64 (2) 121

cer: diagnostics, monitoring and therapeutics. A compre-hensive review. EMBO Mol Med 2012; 4 (3): 143-59.

7. Guo B, Li J, Liu L et al. Dysregulation of miRNAs andtheir potential as biomarkers for the diagnosis of gastriccancer. Biomed Rep 2013; 1 (6): 907-12.

8. Bouyssou JM, Manier S, Huynh D, Issa S, Roccaro AM,Ghobrial IM. Regulation of microRNAs in cancer metas-tasis. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014; 1845 (2): 255-65.

9. Di Leva G, Croce CM. miRNA profiling of cancer. CurrOpin Genet Dev 2013; 23 (1): 3-11.

10. Rosenfeld N, Aharonov R, Meiri E et al. MicroRNAsaccurately identify cancer tissue origin. Nat Biotechnol2008; 26 (4): 462-9.

11. Blenkiron C, Goldstein LD, Thorne NP et al. MicroRNAexpression profiling of human breast cancer identifiesnew markers of tumor subtype. Genome Biol 2007; 8(10): R214.

12. Mattie MD, Benz CC, Bowers J et al. Optimized high-throughput microRNA expression profiling providesnovel biomarker assessment of clinical prostate and breastcancer biopsies. Mol Cancer 2006; 5: 24.

13. WHO International Programme on Chemical SafetyBiomarkers in Risk Assessment: Validity and Validation.2001. Retrieved from http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc222.htm

14. Etheridge A, Lee I, Hood L, Galas D, Wang K. Extracel-lular microRNA: a new source of biomarkers. Mutat Res2011; 717 (1-2): 85-90.

15. Schwarzenbach H, Nishida N, Calin GA, Pantel K. Clini-cal relevance of circulating cell-free microRNAs in can-cer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 11 (3): 145-56.

16. Haj-Ahmad TA, Abdalla MA, Haj-Ahmad Y. Potentialurinary miRNA biomarker candidates for the accurate de-tection of prostate cancer among benign prostatic hyper-plasia patients. J Cancer 2014; 5 (3): 182-91.

17. Arroyo JD, Chevillet JR, Kroh EM et al. Argonaute2complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAsindependent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc NatlAcad Sci U S A 2011; 108 (12): 5003-8.

18. Turchinovich A, Weiz L, Burwinkel B. ExtracellularmiRNAs: the mystery of their origin and function. TrendsBiochem Sci 2012; 37 (11): 460-5.

19. Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM et al. CirculatingmicroRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancerdetection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105 (30):10513-18.

20. Grasedieck S, Scholer N, Bommer M et al. Impact of se-rum storage conditions on microRNA stability. Leukemia2012; 26 (11): 2414-16.

21. Huang Z, Huang D, Ni S, Peng Z, Sheng W, Du X.Plasma microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers forearly detection of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2010;127 (1): 118-26.

22. Bianchi F, Nicassio F, Marzi M et al. A serum circulatingmiRNA diagnostic test to identify asymptomatic high-risk individuals with early stage lung cancer. EMBO MolMed 2011; 3 (8): 495-503.

23. Sanfiorenzo C, Ilie MI, Belaid A et al. Two panels ofplasma microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for pre-diction of recurrence in resectable NSCLC. PLoS One2013; 8 (1): e54596.

24. Cheng H, Zhang L, Cogdell DE et al. Circulating plasmaMiR-141 is a novel biomarker for metastatic colon cancerand predicts poor prognosis. PLoS One 2011; 6 (3): e17745.

25. Chen W, Cai F, Zhang B, Barekati Z, Zhong XY. Thelevel of circulating miRNA-10b and miRNA-373 indetecting lymph node metastasis of breast cancer: poten-tial biomarkers. Tumour Biol 2013; 34 (1): 455-62.

26. Wang H, Tan G, Dong L et al. Circulating MiR-125b asa marker predicting chemoresistance in breast cancer.PLoS One 2012; 7 (4): e34210.

27. Cui EH, Li HJ, Hua F et al. Serum microRNA 125b as adiagnostic or prognostic biomarker for advanced NSCLCpatients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. ActaPharmacol Sin 2013; 34 (2): 309-13.

28. Attard G, de Bono JS. Utilizing circulating tumor cells:challenges and pitfalls. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2011; 21(1): 50-8.

29. Okada H, Kohanbash G, Lotze MT. MicroRNAs in im-mune regulation--opportunities for cancer immunothera-py. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010; 42 (8): 1256-61.

30. Wulfken LM, Moritz R, Ohlmann C et al. MicroRNAs inrenal cell carcinoma: diagnostic implications of serummiR-1233 levels. PLoS One 2011; 6 (9): e25787.

31. Kirschner MB, van Zandwijk N, Reid G. Cell-free micro-RNAs: potential biomarkers in need of standardizedreporting. Front Genet 2013; 4: 56.

32. Kroh EM, Parkin RK, Mitchell PS, Tewari M. Analysisof circulating microRNA biomarkers in plasma and serumusing quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).Methods 2010; 50 (4): 298-301.

33. Pritchard CC, Cheng HH, Tewari M. MicroRNA profil-ing: approaches and considerations. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13 (5): 358-69.

34. Wang K, Yuan Y, Cho JH, McClarty S, Baxter D, Galas DJ.Comparing the MicroRNA spectrum between serum andplasma. PLoS One 2012; 7 (7): e41561.

35. Cheng HH, Mitchell PS, Kroh EM et al. CirculatingmicroRNA profiling identifies a subset of metastatic pros-tate cancer patients with evidence of cancer-associatedhypoxia. PLoS One 2013; 8 (7): e69239.

36. Benz F, Roderburg C, Vargas Cardenas D et al. U6 isunsuitable for normalization of serum miRNA levels inpatients with sepsis or liver fibrosis. Exp Mol Med 2013;45: e42.

37. Bovell LC, Shanmugam C, Putcha BD et al. The prog-nostic value of microRNAs varies with patient race/ethni-city and stage of colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19 (14): 3955-65.

38. Heegaard NH, Schetter AJ, Welsh JA, Yoneda M,Bowman ED, Harris CC. Circulating micro-RNA expres-sion profiles in early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. IntJ Cancer 2012; 130 (6): 1378-86.

39. Nassar FJ, El Sabban M, Zgheib NK et al. miRNA aspotential biomarkers of breast cancer in the Lebanesepopulation and in young women: a pilot study. PLoS One2014; 9 (9): e107566.

40. Bryant RJ, Pawlowski T, Catto JW et al. Changes in cir-culating microRNA levels associated with prostate can-cer. Br J Cancer 2012; 106 (4): 768-74.

41. Lodes MJ, Caraballo M, Suciu D, Munro S, Kumar A,Anderson B. Detection of cancer with serum miRNAs onan oligonucleotide microarray. PLoS One 2009; 4 (7):e6229.

42. Chen ZH, Zhang GL, Li HR et al. A panel of five circu-lating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for prostatecancer. Prostate 2012; 72 (13): 1443-52.

43. Moltzahn F, Olshen AB, Baehner L et al. Microfluidic-

Page 7: MISE AU POINT/IN-DEPTH REVIEW CIRCULATING microRNAs ... · stability in body fluids, miRNAs have been investigated as novel circulating non-invasive biomarkers. Accordingly, their

122 Lebanese Medical Journal 2016 • Volume 64 (2) N. MAKAREM et al. – Circulating microRNAs in cancer

based multiplex qRT-PCR identifies diagnostic and prog-nostic microRNA signatures in the sera of prostate can-cer patients. Cancer Res 2011; 71 (2): 550-60.

44. Shen J, Hruby GW, McKiernan JM et al. Dysregulationof circulating microRNAs and prediction of aggressiveprostate cancer. Prostate 2012; 72 (13): 1469-77.

45. Zhang HL, Yang LF, Zhu Y et al. Serum miRNA-21: ele-vated levels in patients with metastatic hormone-refrac-tory prostate cancer and potential predictive factor forthe efficacy of docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Prostate2011; 71 (3): 326-31.

46. Watahiki A, Macfarlane RJ, Gleave ME et al. PlasmamiRNAs as biomarkers to identify patients with castra-tion-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci2013; 14 (4): 7757-70.

47. Yaman Agaoglu F, Kovancilar M, Dizdar YE et al.Investigation of miR-21, miR-141, and miR-221 in bloodcirculation of patients with prostate cancer. Tumour Biol2011; 32 (3): 583-8.

48. Tang D, Shen Y, Wang M et al. Identification of plasmamicroRNAs as novel noninvasive biomarkers for earlydetection of lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 2013; 22 (6):540-8.

49. Silva J, Garcia V, Zaballos A et al. Vesicle-relatedmicroRNAs in plasma of nonsmall cell lung cancer pa-tients and correlation with survival. Eur Respir J 2011;37 (3): 617-23.

50. Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L et al. Characterization of microRNAsin serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis ofcancer and other diseases. Cell Res 2008; 18 (10): 997-1006.

51. Yuxia M, Zhennan T, Wei Z. Circulating miR-125b is anovel biomarker for screening non-small-cell lung can-cer and predicts poor prognosis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol2012; 138 (12): 2045-50.

52. Cui Y, Xie S, Luan J, Zhou X, Han J. Quantitative proteo-mics and protein network analysis of A549 lung cancercells affected by miR-206. Biosci Trends 2013; 7 (6):259-63.

53. Mar-Aguilar F, Mendoza-Ramirez JA, Malagon-Santiago Iet al. Serum circulating microRNA profiling for identifica-tion of potential breast cancer biomarkers. Dis Markers2013; 34 (3): 163-9.

54. Ng EK, Li R, Shin VY et al. Circulating microRNAs asspecific biomarkers for breast cancer detection. PLoSOne 2013; 8 (1): e53141.

55. Wang F, Zheng Z, Guo J, Ding X. Correlation and quan-titation of microRNA aberrant expression in tissues andsera from patients with breast tumor. Gynecol Oncol2010; 119 (3): 586-93.

56. Sun Y, Wang M, Lin G et al. Serum microRNA-155 as apotential biomarker to track disease in breast cancer.

PLoS One 2012; 7 (10): e47003.57. Eichelser C, Flesch-Janys D, Chang-Claude J, Pantel K,

Schwarzenbach H. Deregulated serum concentrations ofcirculating cell-free microRNAs miR-17, miR-34a, miR-155, and miR-373 in human breast cancer developmentand progression. Clin Chem 2013; 59 (10): 1489-96.

58. Roth C, Rack B, Muller V, Janni W, Pantel K,Schwarzenbach H. Circulating microRNAs as blood-based markers for patients with primary and metastaticbreast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12 (6): R90.

59. Hu Z, Dong J, Wang LE et al. Serum microRNA profil-ing and breast cancer risk: the use of miR-484/191 asendogenous controls. Carcinogenesis 2012; 33 (4): 828-34.

60. Wu Q, Wang C, Lu Z, Guo L, Ge Q. Analysis of serumgenome-wide microRNAs for breast cancer detection.Clin Chim Acta 2012; 413 (13-14): 1058-65.

61. Asaga S, Kuo C, Nguyen T, Terpenning M, Giuliano AE,Hoon DS. Direct serum assay for microRNA-21 concen-trations in early and advanced breast cancer. Clin Chem2011; 57 (1): 84-91.

62. Luo X, Stock C, Burwinkel B, Brenner H. Identificationand evaluation of plasma microRNAs for early detectionof colorectal cancer. PLoS One 2013; 8 (5): e62880.

63. Hofsli E, Sjursen W, Prestvik WS et al. Identification ofserum microRNA profiles in colon cancer. Br J Cancer2013; 108 (8): 1712-19.

64. Brunet Vega A, Pericay C, Moya I et al. microRNAexpression profile in stage III colorectal cancer: circulat-ing miR-18a and miR-29a as promising biomarkers.Oncol Rep 2013; 30 (1): 320-6.

65. Ahmed FE, Amed NC, Vos PW et al. Diagnostic micro-RNA markers to screen for sporadic human colon cancerin blood. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2012; 9 (4): 179-92.

66. Ng EK, Chong WW, Jin H et al. Differential expressionof microRNAs in plasma of patients with colorectal can-cer: a potential marker for colorectal cancer screening.Gut 2009; 58 (10): 1375-81.

67. Pu XX, Huang GL, Guo HQ et al. Circulating miR-221directly amplified from plasma is a potential diagnosticand prognostic marker of colorectal cancer and is corre-lated with p53 expression. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25 (10): 1674-80.

68. Wang S, Xiang J, Li Z et al. A plasma microRNA panelfor early detection of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2015Jan 1; 136 (1): 152-61.

69. Chen X, Hu Z, Wang W et al. Identification of ten serummicroRNAs from a genome-wide serum microRNAexpression profile as novel noninvasive biomarkers fornonsmall cell lung cancer diagnosis. Int J Cancer 2012;130 (7): 1620-8.