minutes committee on local government · 2015. 5. 5. · minutes montana senate 53rd legislature -...
TRANSCRIPT
-
MINUTES
MONTANA SENATE 53rd LEGISLATURE - REGULAR SESSION
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Call ~o Order: By Senator Kennedy, on January 28, 1993, at f 1:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Sen. Ed Kennedy, Chair (D) Sen. Sue Bartlett, Vice Chair (D) Sen. Dorothy Eck (D) Sen. Delwyn Gage (R) Sen. John Hertel (R) Sen. David Rye (R) Sen. Bernie Swift (R) Sen. Eleanor Vaughn (D) Sen. Mignon waterman (D) Sen. Jeff Weldon (D)
Members Excused: Sen. Ethel Harding
Members Absent: None.
Staff Present: Connie Erickson, Legislative Council Rosalyn Cooperman, Committee Secretary
Please Note: These are summary minutes. Testimony and discussion are paraphrased and condensed.
Committee Business summary: Hearing: SB 156, SB 157, SB 230
Executive Action: SB 103
HEARING ON SB 230
opening Statement by Sponsor:
Senator Delwyn Gage, Senate District 5, stated SB 230 has been presented in past sessions but has not received much support. He said SB 230 would make all local elections non-partisan like judicial races. Senator Gage said it does not matter to local folks whether their sheriff is a Democrat or Republican or their Clerk is a Democrat or Republican. He noted there are people in some counties who run under a certain party, regardless of their political affiliation, in order to get elected. Senator Gage added there currently exists an option for local county residents
930128LG.SM1
-
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE January 28, 1993
Page 2 of 9
to decide if their area should hold non-partisan local elections, however he did not think this option was widely used.
Proponents' Testimony:
None. ;
oppt~ents' Testimony:
Mr. Alec Hansen, Montana League of cities and Towns, stated his organization's opposition to SB 230. He said there are many Montana cities and towns which hold partisan local elections. Mr. Hansen presented a letter of opposition to SB 230 from the Missoula City Clerk. (Exhibit #1) He added the option to hold non-partisan local elections already exists in current law through a voter review process every ten years. He said Butte-Silver Bow, a notoriously Democratic area holds non-partisan local elections. He added it was their decision to do so, not the government's. Mr. Hansen concluded local areas should have the authority to determine what kind of elections to hold in their community.
Mr. Gordon Morris, Montana Association of Counties, stated his Association's opposition to SB 230. He felt the decision should be left at the local level.
Ms. Nancy Harte, Executive Director, Montana Democratic Party, stated her organization's opposition to SB 230. She said SB 230 was a further restriction of the voters' choices. Ms. Harte said individuals may run as Independent candidates or as traditional party candidates. She concluded the decision should be left to the discretion of local voters.
Informational Testimony:
None.
Questions from committee Members and Responses:
Senator Rye asked Ms. Harte if it would be easier for a County Commission candidate with a Democratic philosophy to win in Madison or Yellowstone County if he/she ran as a Republican candidate instead. Ms. Harte replied it would depend on the county since Democrats do better in some areas as do Republicans in others. She concluded the most important option is the ability for local residents to choose their local government representation.
Senator Rye asked Senator Gage how a non-partisan local official would be replaced if he/she died prior to the end of the term.
930128LG.SM1
-
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE January 28, 1993
Page 3 of 9
Senator Gage replied any non-partisan individual could be the replacement.
closing by Sponsor:
Senator Gage stated the majority of Montanans are not aware they could hold non-partisan local elections, however they would support the idea overwhelmingly. He said it is unfortunate for qua1ified people to be passed up for local government positions simply because of their party affiliation.
HEARING ON SB 157
opening statement by Sponsor:
Senator Greg Jergeson, Senate District 8, stated SB 157 would provide equal treatment of cities and counties with regard to the acquisition of tax deed property. He said under current law, cities are required to pay delinquent taxes on properties assigned to them by counties, however, the delinquent tax provision does not apply to property acquired by counties. Senator Jergeson concluded SB 157 was drafted at the request of the Mayor of Chinook.
Proponents' Testimony:
Mr. Alec Hansen, Montana League of cities and Towns, stated his organization unanimously passed a resolution to endorse SB 157 at their annual meeting. He said current law exempts counties from paying delinquent taxes on acquired property but does not exempt cities from paying delinquent taxes on property assigned to them. Mr. Hansen stated current law imposes a financial impediment to the acquisition of property by cities and believes cities and counties should be treated equally in this respect. He agreed with the fiscal note which states the financial impact of SB 157 would be negligible, and added representatives of Montana's larger cities agree with this statement. Mr. Hansen stated the majority of cities frequently take assignment of tax deed properties. He said there are instances when cities would be interested in acquiring some of these properties and transferring them to the local housing authority to increase the amount of available low-income housing.
Opponents' Testimony:
Mr. Stan Hughes, Gallatin County Treasurer and President, Montana County Treasurers Association, stated SB 157 would not equalize the treatment of tax-deed property assigned to the city. He added there are technical problems with SB 157 which violate the
930128LG.SM1
-
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE January 28, 1993
Page 4 of 9
principle that the debt follows the lien. It was his opinion the delinquent taxes and the lien are one and the same. Mr. Hughes said SB 157 would separate the lien from the delinquent taxes. Mr. Hughes then gave an example of what, in his opinion, would happen under SB 157. He said the county has a tax lien sale in July and the city can then come in and request an assignment on any properties with delinquent assessments. He added, at that point, the lien would go to the city while the delinquent taxes would stay.with the county. Mr. Hughes said the lien and the taxes, wh~ch are one and the same, are now owned by separate entities. He said this situation creates many problems for the county. Mr. Hughes said once the city takes the assignment, the city has the option of going through the tax deed process and notifying the interested parties which would now include the county because the county still has the delinquent taxes. He said the county's ability to collect on its own debt, which was formerly the lien, is essentially wiped out. Mr. Hughes anticipates under SB 157, every city in every county would automatically request the liens be transferred to them on any properties with delinquent taxes. He said SB 157 does not specify how the city would request the liens be turned over. Mr. Hughes said the city has several options once it takes the assignment on properties. First, the city could do nothing. Second, .the city could pursue the tax deed procedure. He stated the county would be at a disadvantage regardless of the city's course of action. Mr. Hughes said current law permits the county to notify any entity which takes assignment and does not pursue the tax deed procedure that they have a maximum period of 120 days in which to act or the lien will be cancelled. He said under SB 157, the lien is cancelled but the delinquent taxes remain on the county's books. Mr. Hughes said there is no possible way for the county to ever collect the delinquent taxes since the lien has been cancelled, so all the districts within the county do not receive the money owed to them. In the event the city does pursue the tax deed procedure, Mr. Hughes said, 15-17-319 provides for the distribution of proceeds. He said there is no provision in this existing statute to pay the county for the delinquent taxes still sitting on the books. Mr. Hughes also said SB 157 may be in conflict with 15-17-319. He stated the cities currently have the mechanism in place to protect themselves on their delinquent assessments. Mr. Hughes concluded existing statutes provide that cities receive their pro-rated share of money derived from the sale of tax deed land if the proceeds are less than the total of assessments and taxes due. He urged the Committee not to pass SB 157 in its existing form.
Mr. cort Harrington, Montana County Treasurers Association, stated his Association opposes SB 157. He said under existing statutes, the municipality pays the county to take assignment on tax deed property. Mr. Harrington said SB 157 would allow municipalities to take an assignment and sell the property without having to pay the county first.
930128LG.SM1
-
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE January 28, 1993
Page 6 of 9
Mr. Morris stated MACo would work with anyone to resolve SB 157. He believed there was another bill yet to be introduced which would allow counties to turn over property to the city for the specific purpose of using it for low-income housing. He suggested the Committee delay executive action on SB 157 and wait for the other bill. Mr. Morris said it was his understanding the true purpose of SB 157 is to put the city, as a taxing entity, in the position of being able to take tax deeds without paying the delinquent taxes.
~ . ~
Senator swift asked Mr. Hughes if the county was required to pay cities its share of revenue generated from the payment of delinquent taxes on properties. Mr. Hughes replied 7-8-2306 mandates the counties pay cities a pro-rated share on delinquent taxes. Mr. Hughes stated his Association would also work with proponents and opponents of SB 157 to resolve this problem.
Senator Bartlett asked Ms. saisbury if the city received from the county a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Placer Center. Ms. Saisbury replied no and stated, based on county attorney's opinion, the city has the option of picking up an assignment before tax deed is issued. She said if the city does not elect to do so, they may lose their right to the proceeds. Senator Bartlett asked Mr. Harrington if he knew of any similar situations in existence, to which Mr. Harrington replied he believed this situation was unique.
Senator Kennedy submitted to the Committee written testimony he had received from the Missoula County Treasurer. (Exhibit #3)
closing by Sponsor:
Senator Jergeson stated in sponsoring SB 157, he has identified a problem with existing tax deed law. Senator Jergeson said he had no particular pride in authorship of SB l57 and stated he would be welcome to any suggestions for its improvement.
HEARING ON SB 156
opening statement by Sponsor:
Senator Greg Jergeson, Senate District 8, stated SB 156 was drafted in response to an incident in Chinook where a child was seriously injured by a neighbor's pitbull dog. He said while the child ended up in the hospital, nothing was done about the dog or its owner. Senator Jergeson said the father of the child eventually shot the pit bull and was promptly arrested and thrown in jail for malicious destruction of property. Senator Jergeson stated he sees this issue as parallel to noxious weed laws where certain weeds are outlawed. He concluded it was his intent in requesting SB 156 to try to avoid situations like these from
930128LG.SM1
-
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE January 28, 1993
Page 7 of 9
occurring again. Senator Jergeson submitted to the Committee a copy of a letter sent to Representative Mc culloch regarding this matter. (Exhibit #4)
Proponents' Testimony:
Ms: Maryrose Beasley, Treasure State Working Dog Association, stated her organization supports the intent of SB 156 but would ask·~ for consideration of maj or amendments. She said her organization primarily trains dogs in the sport of Shutzhund. She said the Shutzhund sport was established in Germany as a temperance test for the German Shepherd. Ms. Beasley said her Association does not condone animals with bad temperaments and never breeds ill-tempered dogs. She said the Association appreciates that SB 156 is not breed specific since it is impossible to determine on the whole which breeds of dogs are more potentially dangerous than others. Ms. Beasley stated there are very few individuals in Montana qualified to determine if a dog is vicious. She said by the standards of SB 156, all of the dogs in her organization would be considered "potentially dangerous". She said.this categorization would require owners to insure their dogs at a rate which is cost prohibitive to even the most affluent dog trainer. Ms. Beasley also stated she did not believe section 3, part 6 of SB 156 was realistic since no person in their right mind would get close enough to a vicious dog to read its identification tag. Ms. Beasley said the entire section on potentially dangerous dogs should be removed since any dog can be potentially dangerous. She said Section 5 of SB 156 was unrealistic as well. Ms. Beasley stated section 6, part a, should be eliminated since very few owners will admit their dog is vicious or potentially dangerous. She said if SB 156 was implemented, it would be costly and difficult to enforce. Ms. Beasley added it is unfortunate SB 156 only pertains to dogs since many people keep other potentially dangerous animals like snakes and bobcats as pets. Ms. Beasley urged the Committee to adopt language to SB 156 which specifies pet owners are ultimately responsible for the actions of their pet and may be held criminally and civilly liable for any destructive action.
Mr. Roy Brock, operator of Hirschtal Kennels in Elliston, MT, and Protection Training Coordinator for the Treasure State Working Dog Association, stated he supports the intent of SB 156 but is concerned with its wording. Mr. Brock gave Committee members a brochure on the sport of Schutzhund. (Exhibit #5) He said the definition of "potentially dangerous dogs" in SB 156 is so vague it could pertain to any dog. Mr. Brock said there are very few people in Montana who could determine a dog's propensity to attack. He said Section 3, part b of SB 156 is a good idea, but added SB 156 does not specify a standard warning sign to identify dangerous dogs. He added this same concern would apply to the dog's identification tags. Mr. Brock said Section 3, part 4 of SB 156 should also exempt all dogs in training for Schutzhund. He said he would also recommend SB 156 exempt police service dogs from this section, since many police service dogs are trained to
930128LG.SM1
-
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE January 28, 1993
Page 7 of 9
occurring again. Senator Jergeson submitted to the Committee a copy of a letter sent to Representative Mc Culloch regarding this matter. (Exhibit #4>
Proponents' Testimony:
Ms~ Maryrose Beasley, Treasure State Working Dog Association, stated her organization supports the intent of SB 156 but would ask., ~or consideration of major amendments. She said her organization primarily trains dogs in the sport of Shutzhund. She said the Shutzhund sport was established in Germany as a temperance test for the German Shepherd. Ms. Beasley said her Association does not condone animals with bad temperaments and never breeds ill-tempered dogs. She said the Association appreciates that SB 156 is not breed specific since it is impossible to determine on the whole which breeds of dogs are more potentially dangerous than others. Ms •. Beasley stated there are very few individuals in Montana qualified to determine if a dog is vicious. She said by the standards of SB 156, all of the dogs in her organization would be considered "potentially dangerous". She said this categorization would require owners to insure their dogs at a rate which is cost prohibitive to even the most affluent dog trainer. Ms. Beasley also stated she did not believe section 3, part 6 of SB 156 was realistic since no person in their right mind would get close enough to a vicious dog to read its identification tag. Ms. Beasley said the entire section on potentially dangerous dogs should be removed since any dog can be potentially dangerous. She said section 5 of SB 156 was unrealistic as well. Ms. Beasley stated section 6, part a, should be eliminated since very few owners will admit their dog is vicious or potentially dangerous. She said if SB 156 was implemented, it would be costly and difficult to enforce. Ms. Beasley added it is unfortunate SB 156 only pertains to dogs since many people keep other potentially dangerous animals like snakes and bobcats as pets. Ms. Beasley urged the Committee to adopt language to SB 156 which specifies pet owners are ultimately responsible for the actions of their pet and may be held criminally and civilly liable for any destructive action.
Mr. Roy Brock, operator of Hirschtal Kennels in Elliston, MT, and Protection Training Coordinator for the Treasure State Working Dog Association, stated he supports the intent of SB 156 but is concerned with its wording. Mr. Brock gave Committee members a brochure on the sport of Schutzhund. (Exhibit #5) He said the definition of "potentially dangerous dogs" in SB 156 is so vague it could pertain to any dog. Mr. Brock said there are very few people in Montana who could determine a dog's propensity to attack. He said section 3, part b of SB 156 is a good idea, but added SB 156 does not specify a standard warning sign to identify dangerous dogs. He added this same concern would apply to the dog's identification tags. Mr. Brock said Section 3, part 4 of SB 156 should also exempt all dogs in training for Schutzhund. He said he would also recommend SB 156 exempt police service dogs from this Section, since many police service dogs are trained to
930128LG.SM1
-
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE January 28, 1993
Page 8 of 9
be V1Cl0US to potentially anyone but its master. Mr. Brock stated section 5 of SB 156 should be eliminated because there are very few people in Montana who have the expertise to determine any dog's behavior. Mr. Brock said Schutzhund is a legitimate sport and people in his business need to be protected from legislation like SB 156. He said the owners are responsible to tra~n their dogs.
opp&nents' Testimony:
None.
Informational Testimony:
None.
Questions From committee Members and Responses:
Senator Kennedy asked Senator Jergeson if he had any more bills to present to the Committee.
closing by Sponsor:
Senator Jergeson stated his intent in requesting SB 156 was to avoid any more attacks on children by dangerous dogs. He agreed there were problems with the definition of "potentially dangerous dogs" in SB 156 and thinks the wording problems can be worked out.
EXECUTIVE ACTION ON SB 103
Discussion:
Connie Erickson stated the amendment offered by the sponsor, Senator Fritz, to SB 103 would make the language consistent with the firefighter bill passed in the last session.
Motion/vote:
Senator Waterman moved the amendment to SB 103. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Motion/vote:
Senator Waterman moved SB 103 DO PASS AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
930128LG.SM1
-
Adjournment: 2:40 p.m.
JEK/rlc
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE January 28, 1993
Page 9 of 9
ADJOURNMENT
SEN JOHN "ED" KENNE Y, Jr., Chair
~~::
930128LG.SM1
-
ROLL CALL
SENATE COMMITIEE Local Government DATE 1- ?-~--1?
NAME PRESENT ABSENT EXCUSED
... Senator John "Ed" Kennedy if
~
Senator Sue Bartlett / Senator Dorothy Eck V' Senator Delwyn Gage ./ Senator Ethel Harding / Senator John Hertel / Senator David Rye / Senator Bernie Swift { Senator Mignon Waterman ./ Senator Jeff Weldon V Senator Eleanor Vaughn I
Fe8 Attach to each day's minutes
-
SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE REPORT
MR. PRESIDENT:
Page 1 of 1 January 29, 1993
Wft'r your committee on Local Government having had under --cOnsideration Senate Bill No. 103 (first reading copy -- white),
respectfully report that Senate Bill No. 103 be amended as follows and as so amended do pass.
That such amendments read:
1. Page 1, line 22. Following: "salary"
., Chair
Insert: ", following adjustments for income taxes and pension contributions,"
1!L: Amd. Coord. ~ Sec. of Senate
-END-
230920SC.Sma
-
_~ __ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ANANCEANDDE~MANAGEM~T ~~ BUDGET AND ANALYSIS
M I SSOU LA FINANCE/CITY CLERK OFFICE ~~O~~T~~G ¥.?St:.....::::39 435 RYMAN ST. • MISSOULA, MT 59802-4297 • (406) 523-4700 UTILITY BILLING ~ FAX (406) 728-6690 RISK MANAGEMENT
GRANT ADMINISTRATION
The Honorable John "Ed" Kennedy, Jr. Chairman - Local Gov. Committee
~ Montana State Senate Montana State Capitol Helena, Montana 59620
Dear Senator Kennedy:
January 27, 1993 Letter #93-021
JAN 2 81993
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT NO._--'-' ___ _
(}ATE.. I - ,). ~ - 1 3
BILL NO_ .s f3 ~3 0
At their meeting of January 25th, the Missoula City Council voted to oppose SB230, Senator Gage's bill to require local elections on a non-partisan basis. Their feeling was that this issue should be a decision and choice of the local voters rather than mandated by state government. The Montana Constitution requires that local electors vote every ten years to decide whether or not they want to review their form of local government. If the local voters choose to do local review, they could then· consider the question of non-partisan elections. Furthermore, the choice for non-partisan elections can still be accomplished without going through local government review as provided in current law.
As one Council member stated, "If non-partisan elections are such a good idea, why doesn't the bill also require non-partisan elections for the Montana Legislature as well." We would encourage you to leave this important decision in the hands of local voters as it currently stands and oppose SB230. Thank you for considering our viewpoint.
Sincerely,
~L~ Chuck Stearns Finance Officer/City Clerk
cc: Alec Hansen, Montana League of Cities and Towns SB230 File
AN EOUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER M I F IV I H
Printed on 1000,1, Recycled Paper " ,~~
-
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT NO. __ ~~ __ _ [)ATE.. ____ I_.-_:J._~_-_1_3_
BILL NO ___ 5--t3 ___ , _5_r"} __
PLACER CENTER: UNDER THE PRESENT COUNTY CONTRACT
, LOSS: City of Helena:
Taxes Assessments
Total Loss
WIN: County Schools:
Taxes Interest on Contract
Total Received
School District #1:
$34,026.65 $55,596.17
$89,622.82
$37,189.05 $7,525.88
$44,714.93
Taxes $70,653.11 Interest on Contract $11,109.63
Total Received
State of Montana:
County:
Taxes Interest on Contract
Total Received
Taxes Interest on Contract Reimb. Costs (Est.) Profit
Total Received
$81,762.74
$6,698.91 $5,017.25
$11,716.16
$28,356.55 $12,184.76
$150.00 $56,952.38
$97,643.69
Total Contract Proceeds: $235,837.52
-
PLACER CENTER: UNDER SENATE BILL #157:
, LOSS:
" County Schools: ~ School Dis trict #1:
State of Montana; County:
Total Loss
WIN: City of Helena:
Taxes Assessments Interest on Contract Reim b. Cost s (Est.) Profit
Total for City
$44,714.93 $81, 762.74 $11,716.16 $40,541.31
$178,735.14
$34,026.65 $55,596.17 $35,837.52
$150.00 $110.227.18
$235.837.52
Total Contract Proceeds: $235,837.52
-
MISSOULR COUNTY COMM . TEL No.40672140~3 jan - - --':::0 ~ 'j~:~ lr':U':l I'w.ulu r.U"::
MISSOULA ) COUNTY =a..;===
Local Government Committee Senate St.ate C&fit.ol Helena, KT 59'20
Re; SB 157
Dear Senators.
January 28, 1993
OFFICE OF COUNTY TREASURER MISSOULA COUNTY COURTHOUSE
BOX 7249 MISSOULA, MONTANA 59807
= (406) 721·5700
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT NO. ;.2 DATE I - :;. f - '7 ~ Bill NO_ ~ I $..7
After reading the Fiscal Note for sa 157, I believe ~here may be 50~e misunderst.andinq about the effects of the hill.
58 157 would allow municipalit.ies to acquire the county's tax lien on propert.y located wit.hin the municipalit.y without paying any delinquent taxes or costs. If the municipality t.hen re-assigns the tax lien interest, delinquent taxes and costs must be paid to the county and appropriatelY distributed. If an interested party redeems from the assignment., the delinquent taxes and costs are also recovered for the eliqible t.axing authorities.
If, however, the municipality pursues a t.ax deed on the property, none of the tax delinquencies or costs may be recovered for the various taxin9 authorities who should receive such a distribution. Section 7-8-4201 M.C.A. allows municipalities to dispose of any property by a 2/3 vote of the members of the council. The statutes are silent on disposition of the proceeds in such a case. If the property 1s held in t.rust tor a specific purpose, a majority vote of the electors of the municipality is necessary for disposal. The proceeds would then have to paid to the designated special purpose. Section 15-17-317 M.C.A. does require that tax deed property acquired by a municipality must be ~held in trust by the municipality for the improvement fund into which the del1nquent special assessments are payable.-
If municipalit.ies are allowed to acquire the county's tax li~n without paying delinquencies or costs, t.hen lIlUn1cipalities should also lIleet. the requirements of Section 7-8-2306 H.C.A., as do counties, and distribute the proceeds of the sale as they would have been had they been paid before becoming delinquent. The requirement that tax deed property be held in trust for special improvement funds should be eliminat.ed. If these a.endmants to S8 157 are not made, then schools, counties, fire districts, and other taxing jurisdict.ions ~ill be disadvantaged.
Sincerely, (;~:
() ~~ we~romwell Cler~ & Recorder/Treasurer
WRC
-
JAN-27-93 WED 16:09 MIDWEST HEATING & COOLIN 2520615
5~D~ tv\ c Co \ \Oc..~ \-\~ q ~
I Jill Port 1339 Maurine St. Billings. NT do swe~r the following statement is true and on file with the Billings Police Dept.; Division of Animal Control.
On 5-7-91 ~t ~pproximdtely 11:55 A.M. I was walking my 0 ;rear old daughter to school. We were walking down the alley behind my house and she was about 15 teet in front of me. TWo Chows from.the duplex behind our house came out into the alley (through an open gate). They were barking as usudl ~nd pawing the ground. As I passed them they broke the chain off the fence and proceeded to attack me. one on each end of the chain. They bit both legs and arms. I tried to climb the neighbors fence but one dog grabbed my wrist and pulled me to the ground. They continued to attack. I was screaming for help. My neighbor apparentely heard me and came out to heJp. He got the dogs away from me so I could run and they got tangled in a garbage can yack. Animal Control was called ~nd the rest is on record. The dogs were destroyed ~s this was the second bite. They had ~ previous list of citdtions ~nd the owner relinquished them to the officer to be destroyed. I have multiple lacerations on my legs and arms. My daughter witnessed the whole scene and has hdd emo't-iondl problems resulting from this~ and I have had numerous nightmares ~nd ~ fe~r of dogs I never h~d before.
Something should be done to protect people from dangerous dogs. You shouldnJt hdve to wait until someone is permanentely mdimed or killed.
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT NO._ 4 DATE.. / - ;2 f -- 13-BILL NO... S 13 I 5 ~
P.01
-
The
final
are
a of
dev
elop
men
t is
that
of
driv
e en
cour
agem
ent.
The
natu
ral b
ehav
iors
th
at y
ou w
ant t
o en
cour
age
are
play
ing
with
th
e ba
ll, t
ug o
f war
, hid
e an
d se
ek, p
ullin
g to
ys o
n a
strin
g, p
ursu
ing
you
rapi
dly
whe
n yo
u ru
n aw
ay, a
nd fi
nally
def
endi
ng it
self,
its
fam
ily,
and
its h
ome.
The
latte
r re
ally
on
ly s
how
s its
elf b
etw
een
the
ages
of n
ine
and
18 m
onth
s, as
the
pup
begi
ns to
mat
ure,
by
bar
king
at s
trang
ers
or in
trude
rs.
It is
bet
ter
to le
ave
for l
ater
form
al o
bedi
-en
ce tr
aini
ng w
ith a
you
ng d
og. T
he c
hara
c-te
r of
the
pupp
y is
not s
uffic
ient
ly s
trong
to
with
stan
d th
e co
rrec
tions
invo
lved
in o
bedi
-en
ce tr
aini
ng.
Acc
epta
ble
man
ners
at h
ome
and
in th
e ca
r and
"pl
ay"
train
ing,
like
le
arni
ng to
sit
for
a fo
od r
ewar
d, w
ith n
o co
rrec
tions
invo
lved
, is
advi
sabl
e. R
eal o
be-
dien
ce w
ork
shou
ld b
egin
onl
y af
ter t
he d
og
is w
ell o
n its
way
in th
e pr
otec
tion
train
ing.
'0 D
og
s E
njo
y S
chu
tzh
un
d T
rain
ing
?
If tr
aine
d in
the
right
man
ner,
dogs
enj
oy
wor
king
, as
any
one
who
atte
nds
a Sc
htuz
-hu
nd c
ompe
titio
n ca
n se
e. T
he jo
y of
the
dogs
in w
orki
ng w
ith th
eir h
andl
ers
is ev
iden
t. Fo
r tho
usan
ds o
f yea
rs,
dogs
hav
e ad
apte
d to
ser
ve h
uman
s in
a m
utua
lly b
enef
icia
l re
latio
nshi
p. W
hile
dog
s co
uld
mov
e qu
ickl
y,
hunt
pre
y, a
nd p
rote
ct fl
ocks
and
thei
r ow
ner,
the
hum
ans
coul
d pr
ovid
e fo
od,
shel
ter f
rom
th
e m
ost s
ever
e el
emen
ts,
and
prot
ectio
n fro
m la
rger
pre
dato
rs,
besi
des
tend
ing
to th
e do
g's
inju
ries.
A do
g's
reas
on fo
r bei
ng is
to
serv
e hu
man
s. Sc
hutz
hund
trai
ning
hel
ps d
evel
op th
e do
g's
natu
ral i
nstin
cts
to a
hig
h le
vel.
Self-
conf
iden
t dog
s, do
ing
wor
k fo
r whi
ch th
ey
are
wel
l tra
ined
, ar
e ha
ppy
dogs
. Wag
ging
ta
ils,
soun
ds o
f exc
item
ent,
and
stro
ng p
ull-
ing
on a
leas
h al
l sho
w a
n ob
serv
er a
t a
Schu
tzhu
nd tr
ial h
ow m
uch
fulfi
llmen
t dog
s fin
d in
this
wor
k.
Er M
ore
In
form
atio
n A
bo
ut
Sch
utz
hu
nd
The
Uni
ted
Schu
tzhu
nd C
lubs
of A
mer
ica
can
be c
onta
cted
at 3
704
Lem
ay F
erry
Roa
d,
St. L
ouis,
MO
6312
5, o
r by
tele
phon
e at
(3
14) 8
94-3
431.
Sc
hutz
hund
clu
bs a
re o
rgan
ized
by
regi
ons
thro
ugh
the
U.S
., an
d th
ere
are
num
erou
s cl
ubs
in m
ost a
reas
of n
early
all
stat
es.
Reg
iona
l Dire
ctor
s ar
e al
so a
vaila
ble
for
info
rmat
ion
and
guid
ance
in lo
catin
g a
Schu
tzhu
nd c
lub
or s
tart
ing
a ne
w o
ne.
As
of J
anua
ry 1
988,
ther
e w
ere
mor
e th
an
130
full
mem
ber c
lubs
and
14
affil
iate
d cl
ubs
in th
e U
nite
d Sc
hutz
hund
Clu
bs o
f A
mer
ica.
Mor
e th
an 3
,500
indi
vidu
als
wer
e m
embe
rs o
f tho
se c
lubs
. Th
e U
nite
d Sc
hutz
hund
Clu
bs o
f Am
eric
a (U
SA) i
s a
mem
ber o
f the
Wor
ld U
nion
of
Ger
man
She
pher
d D
og C
lubs
, and
sen
ds a
te
am to
the
Wor
ld C
ham
pion
ship
eac
h ye
ar.
In a
dditi
on,
the
USA
san
ctio
ns re
gion
al
cham
pion
ship
s an
d tw
o m
ajor
nat
iona
l ch
ampi
onsh
ips.
It al
so s
anct
ions
con
form
a-tio
n sh
ows
and
cham
pion
ship
s fo
r the
Ger
-m
an S
heph
erd
Dog
. U
SA is
resp
onsi
ble
for s
ched
ulin
g vi
sits
fro
m fo
reig
n ju
dges
and
adm
inis
ters
its
own
judg
es p
rogr
am.
USA
also
mai
ntai
ns a
Bre
ed R
egis
try fo
r G
erm
an S
heph
erd
Dog
s co
nsis
ting
of p
edi-
gree
s fo
r fiv
e ge
nera
tions
. U
SA a
dher
es to
the
VDH
rule
s fo
r Sc
hutz
hund
.
utzh
und
and
the
Ger
man
She
pher
d do
g o
f'
"
SENA
TE L
OCAL
GOV
ERN
M EN
T EX
HIBI
T NO
. S
-~---
DATE
/-
;;. f
-.,
3
;
BILL
NO.
S
G
15
~
-
hat
is S
chu
tzh
un
d?
Schu
tzhu
nd is
a G
erm
an w
ord
mea
ning
"p
rote
ctio
n do
g:' I
t ref
ers
to a
spor
t tha
t fo
cuse
s on
dev
elop
ing
and
eval
uatin
g th
ose
traits
in d
ogs
that
mak
e th
em m
ore
usef
ul
and
happ
ier c
ompa
nion
s to
thei
r ow
ners
. Sc
hutz
hund
wor
k co
ncen
trate
s on
thre
e pa
rts. M
any
fam
iliar
with
the
obe
dien
ce
wor
k of
the
Am
eric
an K
enne
l Clu
b's
affil
i-at
es w
ill r
ecog
nize
the
first
two
part
s, t
rack
-in
g an
d ob
edie
nce.
The
Sch
utzh
und
stan
dard
s fo
r the
third
par
t, pr
otec
tion
wor
k, a
re s
imila
r to
thos
e fo
r dog
s in
pol
ice
wor
k.
Whi
le d
ogs
of o
ther
bre
eds
are
also
adm
it-te
d to
Sch
utzh
und
tria
ls,
this
bre
ed e
valu
a-tio
n te
st w
as d
evel
oped
spe
cific
ally
for
the
Ger
man
She
pher
d D
og. S
chut
zhun
d is
inte
nded
to d
emon
stra
te th
e do
g's
inte
lli-
genc
e an
d ut
ility
. As
a w
orki
ng tr
ial,
Schu
tzhu
nd m
easu
res
the
dog'
s m
enta
l sta
-bi
lity,
end
uran
ce, s
truc
tura
l eff
icie
ncie
s,
abili
ty to
sce
nt, w
illin
gnes
s to
wor
k, c
our-
age,
and
train
abili
ty.
This
wor
king
dog
spo
rt of
fers
an
oppo
rtu-
nity
for d
og o
wne
rs to
trai
n th
eir d
og a
nd
com
pete
with
eac
h ot
her f
or r
ecog
nitio
n of
bo
th th
e ha
ndle
r's a
bilit
y to
trai
n an
d th
e do
g's a
bilit
y to
per
form
as
requ
ired.
It i
s a
spor
t enj
oyed
by
pers
ons
of v
arie
d pr
ofes
-si
ons,
who
join
toge
ther
in a
cam
arad
erie
bo
rn o
f the
ir c
omm
on in
tere
st in
wor
king
w
ith th
eir d
ogs.
Pers
ons
of a
ll ag
es a
nd c
on-
ditio
ns o
f li
fe-e
ven
thos
e w
ith
sign
ifica
nt
disa
bilit
ies
-enj
oy
Schu
tzhu
nd
as a
spor
t. O
ften,
it
is a
fam
ily
flW
ort
._
he
Th
ree
Par
ts o
f a S
chu
tzh
un
d T
rial
The
trac
king
pha
se in
clud
es a
tem
pera
-m
ent t
est b
y th
e ov
erse
eing
judg
e to
ass
ure
the
dog's
men
tal s
ound
ness
. Whe
n ap
proa
ched
clo
sely
on
a lo
ose
leas
h, t
he d
og
shou
ld n
ot a
ct s
hyly
or a
ggre
ssiv
ely.
The
tra
ck is
laid
ear
lier b
y a
pers
on w
alki
ng n
or-
mal
ly o
n a
natu
ral s
urfa
ce s
uch
as d
irt o
r gr
ass.
The
track
incl
udes
a n
umbe
r of t
urns
an
d a
num
ber o
f sm
all,
man
-mad
e ob
ject
s le
ft by
this
per
son
on th
e tra
ck it
self.
At t
he
end
of a
30-
foot
leas
h, t
he h
andl
er fo
llow
s th
e do
g, w
hich
is e
xpec
ted
to s
cent
the
track
an
d in
dica
te th
e lo
catio
n of
the
obje
cts,
usu-
ally
by
lyin
g do
wn
with
it b
etw
een
its f
ront
pa
ws.
The
track
ing
phas
e is
inte
nded
to te
st
the
dog's
trai
n abi
lity
and
abili
ty to
sce
nt, a
s w
ell a
s its
men
tal a
nd p
hysi
cal e
ndur
ance
. Th
e ob
edie
nce
phas
e in
clud
es a
serie
s of
he
elin
g ex
erci
ses,
som
e of
whi
ch a
re c
lose
ly
in a
nd a
roun
d a
grou
p of
peo
ple.
Dur
ing
the
heel
ing,
the
re is
a g
un s
hot t
est t
o as
sure
th
at th
e do
g do
es n
ot o
penl
y re
act t
o su
ch
shar
p no
ises
. The
re is
also
a'se
ries
offi
eld
exer
cise
s in
whi
ch th
e do
g is
com
man
ded
to
sit,
lie d
own,
and
sta
nd w
hile
the
hand
ler
cont
inue
s to
mov
e. Fr
om th
ese
vario
us p
osi-
tions
, the
dog
is r
ecal
led
to th
e ha
ndle
r. W
ith d
umbb
ells
of v
ario
us w
eigh
ts,
the
dog
is re
quire
d to
ret
rieve
on
a fla
t sur
face
, ove
r a
one-
met
er h
urdl
e, a
nd o
ver a
six-
foot
sl
ante
d w
all.
The
dog
is al
so a
sked
to r
un in
di
rect
ion
from
Mdl
eL.W
l,.c
om-
~an~ie d
_n
a
• co
tWfll
Mttd
.
Fina
lly, e
ach
dog
is ex
pect
ed to
sta
y in
a
lyin
g do
wn
posi
tion
away
from
its
han
dler
, de
spite
dis
tract
ions
, at t
he o
ther
end
of t
he
obed
ienc
e fie
ld,
whi
le a
noth
er d
og c
om-
plet
es th
e ab
ove
exer
cise
s. A
ll of
the
obed
i-en
ce e
xerc
ises
are
test
s of
the
dog'
s te
mpe
ram
ent,
stru
ctur
al e
ffic
ienc
ies,
and
, ve
ry im
porta
ntly
, its
will
ingn
ess
to s
erve
m
an o
r wom
an.
The
pro
tect
ion
phas
e te
sts
the
dog'
s co
urag
e, p
hysi
cal s
tren
gth,
and
agi
lity.
The
ha
ndle
r's c
ontro
l of t
he d
og is
abs
olut
ely
esse
ntia
l. Th
e ex
erci
ses
incl
ude
a se
arch
of
hidi
ng p
lace
s, f
indi
ng a
hid
den
pers
on (
act-
ing
as a
hum
an d
ecoy
), an
d gu
ardi
ng th
at
deco
y w
hile
the
hand
ler
appr
oach
es.
The
dog
is ex
pect
ed to
pur
sue
the
deco
y w
hen
an
esca
pe is
atte
mpt
ed a
nd to
hol
d th
e gr
ip
firm
ly.
The
deco
y is
sear
ched
and
tran
s-po
rted
to th
e ju
dge
with
the
hand
ler
and
dog
wal
king
beh
ind
and
late
r at t
he d
ecoy
's rig
ht
side
. W
hen
the
deco
y at
tem
pts
to a
ttack
the
hand
ler,
the
dog
is ex
pect
ed to
sto
p th
e at
tack
with
a fi
rm
grip
and
no
hesi
tatio
n.
The
final
tes
t of
cour
age
occu
rs
whe
n th
e de
coy
is as
ked
to c
ome
out
of a
hid
ing
plac
e by
th
e do
g's
hand
ler
from
the
opp
osite
en
d of
the
tria
l fie
ld.
The
dog
is se
nt a
fter
the
deco
y w
hen
he a
ttem
pts
to r
un a
way
. Jus
t whe
n th
e do
g is
abou
t to
catc
h th
e de
coy,
the
judg
e si
gnal
s th
e de
coy
to tu
rn a
bout
and
run
dire
ctly
at t
he d
og,
thre
aten
ing
the
dog
with
a st
ick.
All
bite
s du
ring
the
prot
ectio
n ph
ase
are
expe
cted
to
be fi
rmly
pla
ced
on th
e pa
dded
sle
eve
and
stop
ped
on c
omm
and
and/
or w
hen
the
deco
y di
scon
tinue
s th
e fig
ht.
The
prot
ectio
n te
sts
_, ar~nde~ssur~ the~s ne~
t~owa"""'r a
c""
,",a
l m~e.
•
-
he
Sch
utz
hu
nd
-Tra
ined
Do
g i
n t
he
Ho
me
Sinc
e Sc
hutz
hund
is th
e de
mon
stra
tion
of th
e G
erm
an S
heph
erd
dog'
s m
ost d
esir-
able
cha
ract
eris
tics,
dog
s w
ell t
rain
ed in
Sc
hutz
hund
are
usu
ally
exc
elle
nt c
ompa
n-io
ns in
the
hom
e. T
he G
erm
an S
heph
erd
Dog
-lik
e an
y ot
her w
orki
ng d
og th
at p
os-
sess
es m
enta
l sta
bilit
y -ha
s tr
ust a
nd c
onfi-
denc
e in
itse
lf, a
llow
ing
it to
be
at p
eace
w
ith it
s su
rrou
ndin
gs.
In a
dditi
on to
sou
nd s
truc
tura
l eff
icie
ncie
s fo
r lo
ng, a
rduo
us w
ork,
the
sta
ndar
d fo
r the
G
erm
an S
heph
erd
Dog
cal
ls fo
r men
tal s
ta-
bilit
y an
d a
will
ingn
ess
to w
ork.
The
dog
sh
ould
be
appr
oach
able
, qui
etly
sta
ndin
g its
gr
ound
, sh
owin
g co
nfid
ence
and
a w
illin
g-ne
ss to
mee
t ove
rture
s w
ithou
t its
elf n
eces
-sa
rily
mak
ing
them
. It s
houl
d be
gen
eral
ly
calm
, but
eag
er a
nd a
lert
whe
n th
e si
tuat
ion
war
rant
s. I
t sho
uld
be fe
arle
ss,
but a
lso g
ood
with
chi
ldre
n.
The
Ger
man
She
pher
d D
og s
houl
d no
t be
timid
or r
eact
ner
vous
ly to
unu
sual
sou
nds
or s
ight
s. A
dog
that
is o
verly
agg
ress
ive
beca
use
of it
s ov
eral
l fea
rs o
f peo
ple
and
even
ts c
an b
e ex
trem
ely
dang
erou
s. Th
e Sc
hutz
hund
spo
rt is
desi
gned
to id
entif
y an
d el
imin
ate
such
dog
s fro
m b
reed
ing
stoc
k.
Bec
ause
Sch
utzh
und
train
ing
give
s th
e ow
ner a
gre
at d
eal o
f con
trol o
ver t
he d
og,
the
owne
r is
able
to le
t the
dog
hav
e m
ore
fun.
Not
onl
y is
Schu
tzhu
nd tr
aini
ng it
self
enjo
yabl
e fo
r the
dog
, but
the
Schu
tzhu
nd-
train
ed d
og k
now
s ho
w to
ple
ase
its o
wne
rs,
crea
ting
a st
rong
er b
ond
betw
een
dog
and
owne
rs.
e S
chu
tzh
un
d-T
rain
ed D
og
fo
r P
oli
ce
Wo
rk
'."'"
A do
g th
at p
erfo
rms
wel
l in
Schu
tzhu
nd
wor
k is
obvi
ousl
y a
very
goo
d ca
ndid
ate
for
polic
e w
ork.
Pol
ice
dogs
, lik
e ot
her s
ervi
ce
dogs
, mus
t hav
e te
mpe
ram
ents
with
a g
ood
foun
datio
n of
inte
llige
nce
and
utili
ty. A
min
-im
al a
mou
nt o
f add
ition
al tr
aini
ng m
akes
man
y w
ell-t
rain
ed S
chut
zhun
d do
gs r
eady
fo
r act
ive
polic
e du
ty. S
uch
fear
less
pol
ice
dogs
can
also
wor
k ar
ound
chi
ldre
n an
d in
cr
owds
with
out w
orry
on
the
part
of t
heir
ha
ndle
rs.
,.Ino
os1n
1! a
Pu
pp
y f
or
Sch
utz
hu
nd
In e
very
bre
ed, t
he p
edig
ree
is th
e ke
y to
kno
win
g th
e po
tent
ial o
f the
pup
py.
Schu
tzhu
nd re
volv
es a
roun
d w
orki
ng l
ines
-ge
nera
tions
of d
ogs
that
hav
e pr
oven
them
-se
lves
and
pro
duce
d si
mila
r cha
ract
eris
tics
in th
eir
offs
prin
g. T
hese
cha
ract
eris
tics
incl
ude
not o
nly
the
phys
ical
str
uctu
re o
f th
e do
g, w
hich
is v
ery
impo
rtant
, but
also
its
tem
pera
men
t. Se
lect
ing
the
bloo
dlin
es fr
om w
hich
you
w
ant y
our p
uppy
may
req
uire
adv
ice.
In
form
atio
n fro
m b
reed
sur
veys
can
hel
p.
Of c
ours
e, i
t mak
es s
ense
to d
iscu
ss y
our
obje
ctiv
es w
ith r
eput
able
and
exp
erie
nced
Sc
hutz
hund
han
dler
s or
ent
husi
asts
. O
nce
you
have
det
erm
ined
that
the
bloo
d-lin
es o
f the
pot
entia
l dam
and
sire
are
of
high
qua
lity,
you
sho
uld
obse
rve
the
pare
nts,
es
peci
ally
the
mot
her,
if th
at is
at a
ll po
ssi-
ble.
The
dam
will
be
the
mai
n in
fluen
ce o
n th
e yo
ung
pup
for
the
first
six
wee
ks o
f its
lif
e. I
f the
dam
is n
ervo
us o
r uns
ure,
ch
ance
s ar
e th
is u
ncer
tain
ty w
ill b
e tra
ns-
ferr
ed to
the
offs
prin
g.
If yo
u ar
e ab
le to
see
the
litte
r, w
atch
the
pupp
ies
toge
ther
and
also
sep
arat
ely,
to
try
to d
eter
min
e w
hich
is th
e be
st p
uppy
. Obv
i-ou
s st
ruct
ural
def
ects
or h
ealth
pro
blem
s sh
ould
be
wat
ched
for.
It is
impo
rtant
that
the
pupp
y ha
ve in
tens
e
inst
inct
to s
talk
the
pre
y-a
bal
l, a
toy,
etc
. -
and
also
be
the
lead
er in
the
sens
e of
bul
-ly
ing
the
othe
r pup
pies
. The
pup
py s
houl
d no
t sho
w fe
ar w
hen
away
from
its
litte
r m
ates
. It s
houl
d no
t nee
d to
sta
y w
ith th
e m
othe
r. Th
e pu
ppy
shou
ld b
e ad
vent
urou
s an
d ac
tive,
pla
ying
with
obj
ects
sho
wn
to i
t by
som
eone
in th
e en
clos
ure,
but
it sh
ould
be
inde
pend
ent e
noug
h to
take
that
obj
ect
and
go o
ff o
n its
ow
n as
wel
l. It
is in
depe
nden
ce a
nd c
onfid
ence
, com
-bi
ned
with
the
posi
tive
cont
act w
ith th
e pa
ck le
ader
(th
e da
m,
at th
is ti
me)
tha
t will
de
velo
p in
to th
e tr
aits
of t
rain
abili
ty t
hat
you
need
.
RaiS
ing
a P
up
py
fo
r S
chu
tzh
un
d W
ork
-r P
uppy
hood
is th
e m
ost c
ritic
al p
erio
d fo
r th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he c
hara
cter
istic
s yo
u w
ant t
o en
cour
age.
You
r loc
al S
chut
zhun
d cl
ub c
an a
dvis
e yo
u ab
out n
urtu
ring
and
so
cial
izin
g yo
ur g
row
ing
pupp
y.
A pu
ppy
lear
ns fr
om it
s ex
perie
nces
, so
you
wan
t to
prov
ide
only
pos
itive
one
s. It
sh
ould
be
prov
ided
with
opp
ortu
nity
to
expl
ore
and
inve
stig
ate
new
situ
atio
ns a
nd
new
peo
ple,
but
alw
ays
in a
non
-thr
eatin
g w
ay. R
emem
ber t
hat y
our g
oal i
s to
bui
ld
conf
iden
ce in
the
you
ng a
min
al. Y
our a
im
is no
t to
dom
inat
e or
opp
ress
the
youn
g pu
p.
Expo
sure
to d
iffer
ent e
nviro
nmen
ts is
cru
-ci
al to
the
gene
ral e
duca
tion
of th
e do
g an
d al
so to
ass
ure
it th
at th
e w
orld
is a
safe
pl
ace.
If s
omet
hing
app
ears
to m
ake
the
dog
unsu
re, g
ive
it th
e op
portu
nity
to in
vest
igat
e it
slow
ly, b
ut d
o no
t for
ce t
he is
sue.
It
is im
pera
tive
to a
void
situ
atio
ns w
here
yo
ur d
og w
ould
be
dom
inat
ed b
y an
othe
r, ol
der o
r stro
nger
dog
, or b
y an
othe
r pup
py.
You
also
wan
t to
avoi
d ha
ving
to d
isci
plin
e or
cor
rect
you
r pup
py a
nd th
us d
ampe
n its
sp
irit o
r dam
age
its s
elf-
conf
iden
ce. Y
ou c
an
do th
is b
y ne
ver l
eavi
ng th
e pu
p in
a si
tua-
tion
whe
re it
can
cau
se d
amag
e to
you
r va
luab
les
or fi
nd i
tsel
f in
a da
nger
ous
pred
iram
ent..
"'.' -
-
-chu
tzhu
nd A
roun
d th
e W
orld
The
first
Sch
utzh
und
trial
was
hel
d in
G
erm
any
in 1
901
to e
mph
asiz
e th
e co
rrec
t w
orki
ng te
mpe
ram
ent a
nd a
bilit
y in
the
Ger
man
She
pher
d br
eed.
Orig
inal
ly, t
hese
do
gs w
ere
herd
ing
dogs
, but
the
indu
stria
l-iz
atio
n of
Ger
man
y en
cour
aged
bre
eder
s to
pr
omot
e th
e us
e of
thei
r dog
s as
pol
ice
and
mlli
tary
dog
s. Th
e V
erel
n fli
r Deu
tsch
e Sc
hafe
rhun
de (S
V) ,
the
pare
nt c
lub,
bec
ame
conc
erne
d th
at th
is w
ould
lead
to c
arel
ess
bree
ding
and
und
esira
ble
traits
suc
h as
men
-ta
l ins
tabi
lity,
so
it de
velo
ped
the
Schu
tzhu
nd te
st.
Sinc
e th
en, m
any
othe
r cou
ntrie
s an
d w
orki
ng d
og o
rgan
izat
ions
hav
e al
so a
dopt
ed
Schu
tzhu
nd a
s a
spor
t and
a te
st o
f wor
king
pe
rfor
man
ce in
dog
s. In
tern
atio
nal r
ules
ha
ve b
een
esta
blis
hed,
and
they
are
adm
in-
iste
red
by th
e V
erei
n fU
r Deu
tsch
e H
unde
s-po
rt (V
DH
). In
197
0 th
e fir
st S
chut
zhun
d tri
al in
the
U.S
. was
hel
d in
Cal
iforn
ia. I
n 19
87, t
he
Uni
ted
Schu
tzhu
nd C
lubs
of A
mer
ica
alon
e sa
nctio
ned
near
ly 3
00 tr
ials
with
a to
tal
entry
of a
bout
1,8
00 d
oglh
andl
er te
ams.
Mor
e th
an 1
7 co
untri
es s
ent t
eam
s of
com
-pe
titor
s to
the
Wor
ld C
ham
pion
ship
for
Schu
tzhu
nd d
ogs
from
the
Wor
ld U
nion
of
Ger
man
She
pher
d C
lubs
.
he S
chut
zhun
d T
itle
s
Ther
e ar
e th
ree
leve
ls of
the
Schu
tzhu
nd
test
. For S
chut
zhun
d I t
he d
og m
ust b
e at
leas
t 14
mon
ths
old
and
pass
an
initi
al te
mpe
ra-
men
t tes
t by
the
judg
e. ,T
he d
o! m
ust h
eel
on th
e le
ash
and
off,
dem
onst
rate
the
wal
k-in
g si
t, th
e w
alki
ng d
own,
and
the
stay
te
sts,
as w
ell a
s th
e se
nd-o
ut. I
t mus
t re
triev
e on
the
flat a
nd o
ver a
hur
dle.
In
track
ing,
it m
ust b
e ab
le to
follo
w a
trac
k '-
y i~ler ~t2~tes"
lier .. Th
~r~ ar
eaJ~
QprQ
tect
iQn
test
s.
..
For S
chut
zhun
d II
the
dog
mus
t be
at
leas
t 16
mon
ths
old
and
mus
t alre
ady
have
ea
rned
its
Schu
tzhu
nd I
deg
ree.
It m
ust
agai
n pa
ss a
U of
the
obed
ienc
e an
d pr
otec
-tio
n te
sts
requ
ired
for
the
Schu
tzhu
nd I
de
gree
, but
thos
e te
sts,
for
Sch
utzh
und
II,
are
mad
e m
ore
diff
icul
t and
req
uire
gre
ater
en
dura
nce,
agi
lity,
and
, ab
ove
all,
cont
rol.
Ther
e is
an a
dditi
onal
ret
rieve
req
uire
d ov
er
the
six
foot
sla
nted
wal
l. In
trac
king
, th
e Sc
hutz
hund
II c
andi
date
mus
t be
able
to fo
l-Io
wa
track
laid
by
a st
rang
er a
t lea
st 3
0 m
inut
es e
arlie
r. Fo
r Sch
utzh
und
III,
the
mas
ter's
deg
ree,
th
e do
g m
ust b
e at
leas
t 18
mon
ths
old
and
mus
t hav
e ea
rned
bot
h th
e Sc
hutz
hund
I a
nd
the
Schu
tzhu
nd II
title
s. A
gain
, the
test
s no
w a
re m
ade
far
mor
e di
ffic
ult.
All
exer
-ci
ses
in o
bedi
ence
and
pro
tect
ion
are
dem
-on
stra
ted
off l
eash
. The
re is
the
addi
tion
of
a w
alki
ng a
nd ru
nnin
g st
and.
In
track
ing,
th
e do
g m
ust f
ollo
w a
trac
k th
at w
as la
id b
y a
stra
nger
at l
east
50
min
utes
ear
lier.
The
track
has
four
turn
s, c
ompa
red
with
two
turn
s fo
r Sch
utzh
und
I and
II, a
nd th
ere
are
thre
e ob
ject
s, ra
ther
than
two,
tha
t mus
t be
foun
d by
the
dog.
The
pic
ture
of o
bedi
ence
, st
reng
th, e
ager
ness
, and
con
fiden
ce p
re-
sent
ed b
y an
exc
elle
nt S
chut
zhun
d III
team
is
a be
autif
ul il
lust
ratio
n of
the
partn
ersh
ip
of h
uman
and
dog
. In
add
ition
to th
e Sc
hutz
hund
tem
pera
-m
ent t
ests
, th
e U
nite
d Sc
hutz
hund
Clu
bs o
f A
mer
ica
offe
r thr
ee tr
aini
ng d
egre
es:
the
FH, a
n ad
vanc
ed tr
acki
ng d
egre
e; t
he B
, a
basi
c ob
edie
nce
degr
ee fo
r tra
ffic
-saf
e co
m-
pani
on d
ogs;
and
the
WH
, or b
asic
pro
tec-
tion
degr
ee w
hich
incl
udes
bas
ic o
bedi
ence
.
he V
alue
to
the
Bre
ed
-A
ny r
egis
tere
d G
erm
an S
heph
erd
that
has
ea
rned
a S
chut
zhun
d de
gree
has
dem
on-
stra
ted
suff
icie
nt a
bilit
y as
a w
orki
ng d
og to
qu
alify
for b
reed
eva
luat
ion.
The
bre
ed e
val-
tio
n_
ery
~d e~ati~he
dog'
s st
ruct
ure,
tem
pera
men
t, an
d pe
digr
ee
and
requ
ires
both
a c
ertif
icat
ion
of g
ood
hip
join
ts a
nd s
uffic
ient
per
form
ance
on
an
endu
ranc
e te
st (
the
AD
). D
ogs
that
do
wel
l in
the
bree
d ev
alua
tion
rece
ive
a K
oerk
lass
e lo
r K
oerk
lass
e II
. Th
is is
a re
com
men
datio
n an
d ev
alua
tion
by a
trai
ned
and
reco
gniz
ed
expe
rt ju
dge
as to
the
wor
thin
ess
of th
e do
g fo
r bre
edin
g. D
ogs
rate
d K
oerk
lass
II a
re
"sui
tabl
e fo
r bre
edin
g" a
nd d
ogs
rate
d K
oerk
lass
e I a
re "
reco
mm
ende
d fo
r bre
ed-
ing~'
By th
us s
cree
ning
dog
s in
ord
er to
se
lect
the
suita
ble
spec
imen
s fo
r br
eedi
ng,
Schu
tzhu
nd h
elps
to m
aint
ain
the
qual
ity o
f th
e br
eed
at a
ver
y hi
gh le
vel.
Thus
, th
ere
is a
very
hig
h le
vel o
f ass
uran
ce t
hat p
uppi
es
born
to S
chut
zhun
d da
ms
and
sire
d by
Sc
hutz
hund
dog
s ar
e m
ore
likel
y to
be
of
relia
ble
tem
pera
men
t, hi
gh in
telli
genc
e,
stea
dy n
erve
s, ex
trem
e en
dura
nce,
gre
at
stre
ngth
, and
sou
nd s
truc
ture
.
hat
Is th
e Ju
dge
Loo
king
for
in th
e ~"'Dog?
At a
ll th
ree
stag
es-S
chut
zhun
d I,
II, a
nd
III -
each
of t
he th
ree
phas
es:
obed
ienc
e,
track
ing,
and
pro
tect
ion,
is w
orth
100
po
ints
, for
a to
tal o
f 300
poi
nts.
If a
dog
doe
s no
t rec
eive
a m
inim
um o
f 70%
of t
he p
oint
s in
trac
king
and
obe
dien
ce a
nd 8
0 % of
the
poin
ts in
pro
tect
ion
-or
if th
e do
g fa
ils t
he
pret
rial
tem
pera
men
t tes
t-it
is n
ot
awar
ded
a de
gree
tha
t day
and
mus
t rep
eat
the
entir
e te
st, p
assi
ng a
ll ph
ases
of t
he te
st
at a
late
r tr
ial.
In e
very
eve
nt,
the
judg
e is
look
ing
for
an e
ager
, co
ncen
tratin
g, a
ccu-
rate
wor
king
dog
. H
igh
ratin
gs a
nd s
core
s ar
e gi
ven
to th
e an
imal
tha
t dis
play
s a
stro
ng w
ill-
ingn
ess
and
abili
ty to
w
ork
for i
ts
hum
an
hand
ler. -
-
Name
u
Representing
7 -,
Bill No.
.tl()~k,,~ c+-., TJ~'; A:»oc, stS 157 I
" Ii II I(
h.
VISITOR REGISTER
Check One
Support Oppose
(
(
(
PLEASE LEAVE PREPARED STATEMENT WITH COMMITTEE SECRETARY
FIe.