minnesota department of transportation ombudsman program 2010 apa upper midwest planning conference...

23
Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Upload: clyde-morton

Post on 11-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman

Program

2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference

September 22, 2010

Page 2: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

What is an Ombudsman?

An Ombudsman is a neutral, informal and independent resource put in place to assist complainants to resolve concerns

Page 3: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

What Does An Ombudsman Do?

• Helps resolve problems and concerns by trying to identify and meet interests of all parties

• Acts in a neutral, informal and independent manner

• Can escalate an issue

• Provides feedback to the organization so it can be proactive in resolving issues or avoid similar issues in the future

Page 4: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

What Will An Ombudsman Not Do?

• Make or override decisions (only presents options) • Advocate for one party or point of view• Own any formal process or policy• Replace formal processes

Page 5: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

What is the Process?• Contact by - phone, e-mail or website• Ombudsman listens and clarifies the issue• Ombudsman will conduct informal fact-finding• Ombudsman listens to all sides• Options are generated• Pros and Cons of options are considered• Option pursued• Commissioner makes decision based on input on

Ombudsman process

Page 6: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

What Are the Benefits of the Process?

• All parties have an opportunity to be heard• A fresh look or perspective is available • Expertise in conflict resolution is provided• Focus on interests vs. positions • Creative options pursued

Page 7: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Categories of Issues Heard

- Damage - Business Impacts - Noise- Access - Drainage -

Ethics/Integrity- Consultant/Contractor Issues- Program Design & Development

Page 8: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Possible Resolutions

• No Change/Education• Settlement• Changed/Modified Decision• Change in Policy or Process• Formal Action

Page 9: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Challenges• Early Intervention• Recognize Conflict• Contract Specs/Contractor relationships• Tech Procedures/Policies• Legal

Page 10: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Lessons Learned

– Public Engagement – Business Impacts– Human Relations – Communication – (How We Make Decisions)– Expectations

Page 11: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Case Examples•Kaganovich- “Where did my trees go?”

•Carol Lawrence- “Buy my house”

•Grant Park- “I want a guardrail”

•Two Harbors Chamber- “Don’t take our billboard”

•Pequot Lakes- “You’re ruining my business”

•Delores Bunker-”Don’t get my feet wet”

Page 12: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Kaganovich: Before

Our Trees

Property line

Page 13: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Kaganovich: After

Page 14: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Carol Lawrence 62-X-Town

6124

Page 15: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Grant Park-Aerial View

Page 16: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Grant Park-Car Crash

Page 17: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Two Harbors

Page 18: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Pequot Lakes- “Bypass/No Bypass”

Page 19: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Delores Bunker

Page 20: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Delores Bunker

Page 21: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

How You Can Use the Ombudsman?

• Tool– Angry Constituent– Constituents Stuck on a Position– Constrained by Process

• Advice/Consultation– Public Engagement– Identifying Problem and Issues

Page 22: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

How You Can Use the Ombudsman? (cont.)

• Problem Solving– Alternatives – Outside the Box– Adding Expertise

• Political– Neutral– Reasonable

Page 23: Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

Questions?

Deb LedvinaTransportation [email protected]

651-366-3052www.dot.state.mn.us/

ombudsman