minnesota assessment program january 15, 2012 3 agenda state assessment program update expectations...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 2: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Minnesota Assessment Program
January 15, 2012
![Page 3: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Agenda
State Assessment Program Update
Expectations
Feedback
Game Rating Review
Match Assessment Exercise
Brief 2 – 3 Minute Presentations
![Page 4: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
State Assessment Team
Bob Petersen – SDA
Bob Petersen
@nationalref
National Assessor
National Referee Emeritus
Associate Instructor
Kip Jackson – Deputy SDA
State Assessor
National Referee
4
![Page 5: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Responsibilities
Bob Petersen – SDA
Training
Assignment
Programs
Kip Jackson – Deputy SDA
Mentoring
5
![Page 6: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Assessment Program Update
![Page 7: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
2011 Assessors
45 total assessors registered3 National Assessors
including 1 Referee Inspector
2 National Assessors Emeritus14 State Assessors7 Referee Assessors19 Associate Assessors
![Page 8: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Added Assessors
Artem Sher, new State AssessorKip Jackson, new State AssessorMatt Tiano, new Associate AssessorJohn Morstad, new Associate AssessorKyle Burkhardt, new Associate AssessorKen Lamb, returning State Assessor
![Page 9: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Assessor Upgrades
Doug MarshakTo Referee Assessor
S. John HagensteinTo State Assessor
Sam TriguiTo State Assessor
![Page 10: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
2011 Assessor Training
State Assessors Course, Orlando, FLS. John HagensteinKip JacksonArtem SherSam Trigui
![Page 11: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
2011 Assessor Training
State Assessors Course, Orlando, FLS. John HagensteinKip JacksonArtem SherSam Trigui
State Assessor Academy, Developmental Academy Playoffs, Frisco, TX
Gentry Thatcher
![Page 12: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
2011 Games Covered
Minnesota Cup – 5 games including FinalMRSL Playoffs
Quarterfinals through Finals
2 Developmental Academy U18
![Page 13: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
2011 Administrative Improvements
Most state assessors access to ‘Pro’ side of gameofficialsAdded and improved features on SRC site
Improved functionalityAssessor forms and guides added
Referee upgrade process strengthenedChanged again for 2012
Assessor game and mileage fees determined‘State Inspector’ list identified
Assist with assessor training and advanced referees
![Page 14: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Referee Upgrading
Only for referees upgrading to grades 6 or 5Old process for 2011
Must pass two (2) mentoring reviews before next stepPotential to not move past mentoringMust pass required formal assessments
New process for 2012One (1) mentoring review before next stepEveryone will proceed to formal assessmentsMust pass required formal assessments
![Page 15: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Needs and Future Plans
Ensure all assessors have website accessReferee & game rating conformityAdd and improve items to SRC site as neededMYSA MentorshipRegional and US Soccer event participation‘Remote’ assessmentsAssessor coaches for high potential refereesAssessor academy during State Cup
![Page 16: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Games to Cover
Developmental AcademyMinnesota and Wilson CupMRSL PlayoffsNPSL – Men and WomenMN Stars FC ExhibitionsMidwest Regional LeagueMYSA State Tournament
![Page 17: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Assessor Academy
During first weekend of State CupOlder age group games
Friday night through Sunday afternoonUp to 8 assessors2 – 3 assessor instructors7 – 8 assessments each assessorCritique of game observation and feedback methodsLet Bob Petersen know if interested
![Page 18: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Expectations
![Page 19: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Program Expectations
Quality of assessmentsMore discriminateUseful informationAccurate grading
Feedback to entire crewAll assessments entered into gameofficialsEmail copies of pdf to referees within 7 daysMaintenance and upgrade assessments, results in SRC site within 48 hours
![Page 20: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Vernacular
Acceptable performanceUnacceptable performance
Do NOT use FAIL or FAILURE
![Page 21: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Feedback
![Page 22: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Feedback Preparation
The focus is always on the referees and their developmentDevelopmental issues AND positivesWhat are you going to ask about?Prepare questions on big incidentsHow player and referee actions affected the matchUse match factsDo not use own biases
![Page 23: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Feedback Preparation
Assessors must be experts at ‘connecting the dots’If a referee has an area that is not acceptable, you must inform them and why
Individual criteriaTotal match performance
![Page 24: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Terminology
Use terms described in the criteriaPresencePOE on elbowing (tool v weapon)POE on dissent (personal, public, provocative)Ask, tell, removeCareless / reckless / excessive forceOptions100% misconductPlayer needed / game needed
![Page 25: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Feedback Session
Engage the whole crewFacilitate the discussion
Try get the crew to do most of the talking
Ask questions of entire crewDifferent anglesDifferent points of view
Acknowledge positivesOffer suggestions and alternate methods of handling incidents as neededDo not get into extended debates
![Page 26: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
FC Dallas v Weston FC
26
![Page 27: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
FC Dallas v Weston FC
1’, Red defender #4 runs upfield and commits a hard foul on White #244’, White #24 tackles Red #4 unfairly from behind
Simple foul called
16’, Red #4 elbow on White #24 incident51’, Red forward commits a late tackle from behind53’, White forward jumps very late at opposing GK58’, White midfielder commits bad tackle at midfield
Referee briefly talks to player
61’, Red midfielder runs over white player from behind at midfield
Referee briefly talks to player
![Page 28: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Longer Postgame Method
3 positives3 negatives3 things referee will do differently3 action items
![Page 29: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Newer Postgame Method
3 events in first half3 events in second half
Tie issues togetherPositive and developmental
Anything referee would do differentlyTime permitting
![Page 30: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Do you have to
give verbal
feedback
immediately
after the match?
30
![Page 31: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Reporting
Written feedback must be close to verbalNo surprises!
Accurately critique ratingsAre your scores appropriate?
Same expectations of referees – timely
![Page 32: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Game Rating Review
![Page 33: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Unified Grading ScaleNot
Acceptable Very Good OutstandingAcceptable
69 or less 70 - 79 80 - 89 90 - 100
Competitive Difficult Very DifficultVaries
75 85 95Minimum 69
Difficult game but ref handled all
critical decisions80 - 93
Difficult managed to Competitive
76 - 84
Low70 - 74
Very Difficult managed to
Difficult86 - 94
Starting point for performances in each game “difficulty” area.• Scores move
up/down depending upon ref performance and decisions.
Competitive game but ref handled all critical decisions
70 - 83
Scoring Range
Game Difficulty
Standard Performance
Level
Performance or Game Critical
69 or less
![Page 34: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
What elements contribute to game difficulty?
![Page 35: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Rating Questions
Does a low or easy game rating also mean a not ratable game or insufficient test?
What does a score of 95 mean?
What does a score of 50 mean?
![Page 36: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Game Rating Example
U17 boysRelatively low foul count1 caution given plus 1 tough incident with player and goalkeeper that the referee handled well
![Page 37: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Game Rating Example
U17 boysRelatively low foul count1 caution given plus 1 tough incident with player and goalkeeper that the referee handled well
What game difficulty do you expect?What referee scores would you expect?
![Page 38: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Game Rating Example
U17 boysRelatively low foul count1 caution given plus 1 tough incident with player and goalkeeper that the referee handled well
AR2 (grade 8) given 85AR1 (grade 16) given 95Referee (grade 7) given 90Assessor rated as difficult based upon POTENTIAL of poor player behavior and incident
![Page 39: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Game Rating Guide
How competitive was the game to expectations for that level?What elements were present before the game?What elements or events occurred throughout the game?How did any of these elements contribute to the competitiveness or difficulty?
Do not base rating on the referee gradeDo not rate a game based on how difficult the game would be for you
![Page 40: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Low, Competitive, Difficult, or Very Difficult
U13 girls MYSAU17 boys MYSAU17 boys State Cup SemifinalU16 boys Mpls United v Mpls United PremierD1 MRSL Red Devis v TsunamiD1 MRSL Medtronic v JooGoo Road WarriorSporting KC v Houston DynamoChivas Guadalajara v Club AméricaUSA v México World Cup Qualifier
![Page 41: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Match Assessment Exercise
![Page 42: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Directions
Your table is your groupUse Game Data form for notes10 minutes to fill out formsRate game difficulty with reasons and notes on overall performance in first section3 comments in first 2 criteria for referee1 comment in remaining criteria for referee and all criteria for ARs and 4th officialScore referee teamBrief 2 – 3 minute presentation
![Page 43: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Prairie Seeds Academy v
Benilde - St. Margaret’s
![Page 44: Minnesota Assessment Program January 15, 2012 3 Agenda State Assessment Program Update Expectations Feedback Game Rating Review Match Assessment Exercise](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022032604/56649e615503460f94b5c50b/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Presentations
Game difficultyReferee scores3 positive comments on referee3 developmental comments on referee