ministry of natural resources and ecology
DESCRIPTION
MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ECOLOGY FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION OF NATURAL RESOURSCES USE. Waste management in Russian Federation. Chief Vladimir Vladimirovich Kirillov. Belgium 28 October 2010. General situation in waste management. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ECOLOGYMINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ECOLOGY
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION OF NATURAL RESOURSCES USEFEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION OF NATURAL RESOURSCES USE
Waste management in Russian FederationWaste management in Russian Federation
ChiefChief VladimirVladimir VladimirovichVladimirovich KirillovKirillov
Belgium28 October 2010
• Currently, in the territory of the Russian Federation in waste dumps and stockpiles are accumulated more than 94 billion tons of solid waste
• Over the past 5 years the total amount of waste produced in Russia increased by 1.5 times
General situation in waste management
2
Type of waste
54%
17%
12%
16%
extraction of fueland energymineralsnon-ferrous metals
other waste,including utilities
ferrous metal
City Population Volume of waste
(t/year) Volume of SDW
(t/year) Waste paper
(t/year)
Ferrous metal
(t/year) PE
(t/year) LPP+HPP
(t/year)
Base metal
(t/year) Glass
(t/year)
N.Novgorod 1 311 000 307 026 220 336 10 2 625 3 935 4 320 551 10 492
Samara 1 158 100 271 218 271 218 9 269 2319 3 476 3816 487 9 269
Omsk 1 133 900 265 550 190 571 9 075 2 270 3 403 3 737 476 9 075
Rostov 1 070 200 250 632 179 866 8 565 2 143 3 212 3 527 450 8 565
Ufa 1 047 600 245 340 176 067 8 384 2 097 3 144 3 452 440 8 384
Volgograd 1 012 800 237 190 170 218 8 106 2 028 3 040 3 338 426 8 106
Perm 1 100 000 257 611 184 874 8 804 2 202 3 301 3 625 462 8 804
Ykaterinburg 1 293 000 302 810 217311 10 2 589 3 881 4 261 543 10 348
Kaluga 334 750 78 396 56 261 2 679 670 1 005 1 103 141 2 679
Tver 408 900 95 761 68 723 3 273 819 1 227 1 348 172 3 273
Total 10977250 2570285
1844916
87853 21897 32945 36175 4612 87853
Assessment of volumes of MSW and secondary resources for several cities of Russia
3
Note:PE – polyethyleneLPP – Low-pressure polyethyleneHPP – high-pressure polyethylene
Disposal and utilization of MSW
4
7 5
39
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Incinerators Trash recyclingplants
Waste sortingcomplexes
1699
576
5243
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
MSW landfills Industrial wastedisposal facilities
Illegal dumps
The most widely used ways of storing and processing of MSW
1. Pre-sorting
3. Incineratio
n
2. Sanitary dirt fill
5
The main economic benefits of pre-sorting
1. Return of recycled materials in processing due to what saving of natural resources of oil, ferrous and nonferrous metals is made, which are irreplaceable natural resources, and also due to sorting it is possible to reduce the need of cellulose industry in wood raw material that has a direct environmental effect on conservation of forest lands.
2. As a result of the solid waste sorting and reuse of sorting products the volume of solid waste reaching the disposal of waste at landfills decreases, as the major sorted products are waste with long expansions (PE, HPP and other plastics), decrease of landfill reclamation and return of lands allocated for it to the utility take place.
3. Not a few important effect of reducing the volume of solid waste to be disposed of is to reduce the land needed for landfills for disposal of solid waste and allocation of these areas for agricultural use.
6
Sanitary dirt fill
Household waste
Landfill gas
LandfillingBiogas energy
complex
1 tons
100 m3
7
Incineration level of municipal solid waste in some countries
France
Italy
Austria
Germany 20-40%
SwedenBelgium 48-50%
Japan
70%
SwitzerlandDenmark 80%
USAEngland
Russia
2%
10%
Moscow
10%
8
Waste sorting systems in Russia
Tolyatti
Belgorod
Moscow
St. Petersburg
Voronezh
Ufa
Arkhangelsk
Barnaul
9
Assessment of volumes of MSW and extracted secondary resources for several cities of Russia
10
1731
43293
64939
71433
23811
1731
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
Waste paper (t/year)
Ferrous metal (t/year)
PE (t/year)
LPP+HPP
(t/year)
Mix (t/year)
Glass (t/year)
Note:PE – polyethyleneLPP – Low-pressure polyethyleneHPP – high-pressure polyethylene
Forecasted annual gross revenue for some cities in Russia(euro)
11
5 154 822,09
912 833,08
4 590 309,39
5 315 910,29
885 985,05
4 080 900,82
0,00
1 000 000,00
2 000 000,00
3 000 000,00
4 000 000,00
5 000 000,00
6 000 000,00
МС-11 Ferrousmetal
PE LPP+HPP Mix Glass
Note:MC – waste paperPE – polyethyleneLPP – Low-pressure polyethyleneHPP – high-pressure polyethylene
Cost of services for export of solid waste in some regions of Russia (euro)
№ City Rate / person /
month Rate / person /
year Population, person
1 Moscow 0,37 4,42 10 101 500
2 St. Petersburg 0,27 3,25 4 668 400
3 Voronezh 0,18 2,12 848 700
4 Kursk 0,14 1,69 412 600
5 Yaroslavl 0,14 1,72 613 200
6 Ryazan 0,20 2,43 521 700
7 Lipetsk 0,19 2,23 506 000
12
Pilot projects of Rosprirodnadzor in Kemerovo, Belgorod, Kirov and Kaluga Regions
Kemerovo region
Kaluga region
Russian Federation
13
Belgorod
Kirov region
Project purpose
Improvement of slum populated areas of municipalities of the Kemerovo, Belgorod, Kirov and Kaluga Regions
Involvement in recycling of useful components contained in the consumption waste
Creation of a modern system of treatment of consumption waste, including transportation, sorting and
disposal
14
Project task
Modernization of appropriate enterprises of utilities complex in view of the developed
complex system of treatment of consumption waste in population
Establishment of sanitary epidemiological service meeting the current requirements of
the order of operation of landfills for disposal of consumption waste and working
conditions of staff
Organization of design and construction of efficient waste sorting complex providing
deep recycling of consumption waste
15
Source of incomes
Payment by business enterprises for acceptance and disposal of solid
waste
Payment by municipal enterprises of housing and utilities services for acceptance and disposal of solid
waste
Income from sale of sorted
secondary raw materials
16
Project risks
Marketing Technological Legal
• Possible lack of regional municipal rates for acceptance and disposal of solid waste without the appropriate cost-based rates, which may affect the value of sales revenue
• Less than taken in the project percentage of recycled output, which may be related to morphological composition of MSW of the specific regional project
Connected with possibility of increasing expenses and estimated cost of the project relating to implementation of regional projects. At this stage, the risk can be defined as the average because it mainly depends on the expenses connected with the preparatory work and arrangement of land
Connected with possibility of non-license or permit under the competence of regional authorities. This kind of risk can be estimated as low, cause in all pilot regions there are letters of the governors about the readiness of territories to participate in pilot projects
17
Thank you for your attention!
18