mind the gap: modeling learning in a professional curriculum
DESCRIPTION
Presentation from EURO 2011 (European OR Conference) held in Lisbon, July 2011. The content focuses on using podcasting and vodcasting in assessment feedback using problem structuring methods.TRANSCRIPT
Mind the gap: modeling learning in a professional curriculum
Dr. Jo Smedley
Associate Dean (Learning & Teaching) &
Alexandra Dobson Lecturer in Law
Changing learning and teaching styles
• Learners as participant with tutor as facilitator
• Teaching and learning accessible on an “anywhere, anytime, anyhow” basis.
• Student as a “customer” with a need to provide a consistently high quality student experience
• Earning and learning
• Evaluation with user groups to measure impact of learning through technology
• Multiple evaluating criteria included, reflecting the needs of higher education stakeholders.
The project
• Exploring innovative uses of modern technologies in learning and teaching enhancement
– Using technologies for assessment & feedback
– Podcasting .v. vodcasting
• Staff development
Feedback
• Did not access the information
Improvements
• It could have been longer • Connection speed • Very low production standards
Evaluating organisational learning through technology
• Bacsich (2005) focused on benchmarking in universities – Oriented to benchmarking administrative processes with
little directly about e-learning.
• UK national Benchmarking and Pathfinder programme between 2003-2008 provided UK Universities with a structured approach – Improve organizational approaches of learning using
technology and assist with its continued implementation.
• Involved five methodologies:- – ELTI (Embedding Learning Technologies Institutionally) – eMM (e-Learning Maturity Model) – MIT90s – OBHE/ACU – Pick and Mix
Using eMM
• Marshall and Mitchell (2005)
– Learning
– Development
– Support
– Evaluation
– Organization
• Organisational and individual perspectives
Modelling impact
• Organisational learning
• Individual learning
OOOOOO OESDLI
936710
9
1
3
1
6
1
7
1
10
1
i
Oi
i
Oi
i
Oi
i
Oi
i
Oi
O
OESDL
I
936710
9
1
3
1
6
1
7
1
10
1
i
Ii
i
Ii
i
Ii
i
Ii
i
Ii
I
OESDL
I
Applying the model to a real-life case study: Law for Managers
• Four short-course/modules in employer facing flexible learning curriculum
– Law for Managers: Discrimination in the Workplace
– Law for Managers: Health and Safety/Corporate Manslaughter
– Law for Managers: Privacy in the Workplace
– Law for Managers: Business Characteristics
• Various blends of modern technologies
Evaluating impact from the learning
• Question categories for tutors and learners
– D: Aspects relating to delivery
– C : Aspects relating to content
– A : Aspects relating to assessment
– R : Aspects relating to resources
– Q: Quality of learning experience
Developing the modelling equations
• Impact
• Experience/expectation gaps
QERACDI
n
i
Li
n
i
Tigap DDD11
n
i
Li
n
i
Tigap CCC11
n
i
Li
n
i
Tigap AAA11
n
i
Li
n
i
Tigap RRR11
n
i
Li
n
i
Tigap EEE11
n
i
Li
n
i
Tigap QQQ11
Continuing developments
• Definition/categorisation of elements
• Optimisation of elements to maximise impact
• Weighting factors
Questions
Email: [email protected] & [email protected] http://wiki.newport.ac.uk/index.php?title=Jo_Smedley%27s_wiki