mind and mechanism

21
MIND AND MECHANISM By Drew McDermott What Does it Mean “To Compute?” A Review by Kenton Anderson

Upload: grover

Post on 24-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Mind and Mechanism. By Drew McDermott What Does it Mean “To Compute?” A Review by Kenton Anderson. Major Players. Chalmers Dennett Searle Crick and Koch Fodor McDermott. David Chalmers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NK1Yo6VbRoo 2:07-3:34. Daniel Dennett. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mind and Mechanism

MIND AND MECHANISMBy Drew McDermott

What Does it Mean “To Compute?”A Review by Kenton Anderson

Page 2: Mind and Mechanism
Page 3: Mind and Mechanism
Page 4: Mind and Mechanism

Major PlayersChalmersDennettSearleCrick and KochFodorMcDermott

Page 5: Mind and Mechanism

David Chalmers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NK1Yo

6VbRoo

2:07-3:34

Page 6: Mind and Mechanism
Page 7: Mind and Mechanism
Page 8: Mind and Mechanism
Page 9: Mind and Mechanism

Daniel Dennett http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psOce

dY4Ywc&feature=related :22-2:58

Page 11: Mind and Mechanism

Crick & Koch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqMAkbrp5uA

2:30-5:00

Page 12: Mind and Mechanism

Jerry Fodor

Modularity of the Mind

Page 13: Mind and Mechanism

McDermott’s Chapters1. Shows his intent to overcome first order flaws

• Places his theory as a second order theory 2. Surveys state of AI research 3. Detailed explanation of his Theory of Consciousness4.Answers Objections

• Ill-defined terms computer and Symbol5. Defines Computer and Symbol6. Effects of theory on religion and ethics

Page 14: Mind and Mechanism

McDermott’s ArgumentSecond-Order Theory of Consciousness:• Digital computer simulates Modules of Brain Activity• Includes Qualia• Disagrees with Dennett’s Intentional Stance• Appeals Little to Neuroscience• Computationalism and Functionalism

Page 15: Mind and Mechanism

The Problem:“How can a purely physical organ—the brain—experience?

Page 16: Mind and Mechanism

Answer:

Humans have minds because they (or their brains) are computers.

Page 17: Mind and Mechanism

Development:•Computers have things in common with the brain

• Both make and use models of their worlds• Both can (theoretically) experience qualia in their

own way• Both of these elements occur via codes and

molecules•Phenomenal Consciousness originates:

• For Neurologists, in protoplasm (living, feeling parts)• For McDermott, opposite intuition:

• Feeling is unrelated to “being alive”• “The great majority of living things never feel anything.”

•Therefore, both living systems and other organisms can have feelings•Should therefore accept H that organisms have desires, beliefs, and feelings somehow similar to ours•Consciousness is thus possible in organisms such as computers.

Page 18: Mind and Mechanism

PAPER #2: “AI & INTELLIGENCE”

•In order to refute critics—such as Searle—AI must create computational models explaining Vision, Language, Locomotion•First section: Overview of Consciousness Theories•Phenomenological Consciousness is a property of a computational system if models itself as experiencing.•Middle Section:

•Defines a computational system in detail•Shows how one can exhibit intentionality•Shows that consciousness is modeling self as having experiences

•So, computers (s.f. intelligent robots) can theoretically be conscious.•And human beings can, conversely, be seen as robotic.

Page 19: Mind and Mechanism
Page 20: Mind and Mechanism

References

McDermott, D. (2001). Mind and Mechanism. Cambridge: The MIT

Press.McDermott, D. (2007). Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness.

Chapter 6 of Philip David Zelazo, Morris Moscovitch, and

Evan Thompson (eds.): The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, 117–150.

 http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/dvm/papers/conscioushb.pdf

Page 21: Mind and Mechanism

MIND AND MECHANISMBy Drew McDermott

A Review by Kenton Anderson

Question to Ponder: “Are we anything more than computers

and robots?”