milwaukee mathematics partnership sharing in leadership for student success national science...
TRANSCRIPT
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success
National Science Foundation Site Visit, 8–10 June 2005
Steering
Committe
e
Principal Investigator Dr. DeAnn Huinker, UWM
Co-Principal InvestigatorsDr. Kevin McLeod, UWMMr. Henry Kranendonk, MPSDr. Kimberly Farley, MATCDr. Aquine Jackson, MPS
Key IndividualsDr. Hank Kepner, UWMMr. David Ruszkiewicz, MATC Ms. Kathy Swope, MPSMr. Bob Lehmann, MTEA
MMP Goals•Comprehensive
Mathematics Framework
•Distributed Leadership
•Teacher Learning Continuum
•Student Learning Continuum
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Building Innovationsfor Collaboration
• Mathematics Leadership through School-based Learning Teams
• Mathematics Design Teams
• Transition to Post-secondary Mathematics
• IHE Network for Mathematics
Distributed Leadership Model for Mathematics
Learning Team
Other Key Teachers
Principal
Literacy Coach
Math Teacher Leader
District MathematicsLeadership
IHE Faculty Mathematics &
Math
Education
Building District Capacity
Teacher Leadership Math Teacher Leaders Math Specialists Teachers-in-Residence Assessment and Other
Leaders
Challenging Mathematics Comprehensive Mathematics
Framework Learning Targets State Standards and Descriptors Classroom-based Assessments
Mathematics Design Teams
• Implement recommendations of The Mathematical Education of Teachers.
• Develop mathematical knowledge needed for teaching.
• Mathematics content tied to classroom practice.
Design Team Members
Problem Solving Math – Dr. Richard O’MalleyMath Ed – Dr. Hank Kepner Math Ed – Kelly Kaiser Teacher - Sharonda Harris
Discrete Probability & Statistics
Math – Dr. Richard Stockbridge Math – Gary LuckMath Ed – Dr. Hank KepnerTeacher – Bernard Rahming Teacher – Pat Hopfensperger
Geometry Math – Dr. Ric Ancel Math Ed – Dr. Hank Kepner Teacher– Melissa Hedges
Algebraic Structures Math – Dr. Craig Guilbault Math Ed – Dr. Hank Kepner Teacher – Connie LaughlinTeacher – Nancy Jo Grochowski
Secondary Capstone Course
Math – Dr. Kevin McLeod Math Ed – Dr. Hank Kepner Teacher – Dan Lotesto
175/176 and 275/276 Math – Gary Luck Math – Dave Ruszkiewicz Math – Tom Geil Math Ed – Dr. Hank Kepner Math Ed – Meghan Steinmeyer
Teachers-In-Residence
• Experienced teachers from the Milwaukee Public Schools.
• On special assignment at the university.
• Link academic teacher preparation and urban classroom practice.
• Align teacher preparation and K-12 reform initiatives.
Transition to Post-Secondary
Mathematics• Analysis of UWM & MATC placement data.
• Publicizing expectations and policies of UWM & MATC placement tests.
• Pilot programs at two MPS schools.
• Mathematics Placement Enhancement Program (PEP) at UWM.
Transition to College
New Courses
Math Focus
CUTEP
TheFuture
GraduationRequirements
InstitutionalChange
MILWAUKEE AREA Technical College
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
IHE Network for Mathematics
• Comprised of mathematics faculty and mathematics educators from two-year and four-year universities and colleges.
• Engage IHE faculty in studying the mathematical preparation of teachers.
• Engage IHE faculty with PK-12 teachers and district specialists.
Awareness ofLearningTargets
Unpack & AlignTargets to
StateFramework
Level 1 CABS:Designing
CABS
Level 2 CABS:Examining
Student work
Level 3 CABS:FormativeFeedback
Understandimportance ofidentifying andarticulating bigideas in math tobring consistencyto a school’smath program.
• Grade level• Across grades
Develop meaningfor math ideasembedded in thetargets andalignment to statestandards andschool’s mathprogram.
• Thinking Levels• State Descriptors
Provide measureof consistency ofstudent mathachievement onthe targets.
• Data on studentachievement
• ClarificationStatements
• School CABS• District Models
Examine studentwork to monitorachievement andprogress towardthe math targets.
• Protocol forstudent work
• Grade level• Across grades
Use student workfor instructionaldecisions and forappropriate andcontinuousstudent feedback.
• Scoring guides• Feedback guide
or templates• Rubrics
Learning Teams Continuum of Work for Mathematics
n
Awarenessof Learning
Targets
Unpack &Align Targets
to StateFramework
Level 1CABS:
DesigningCABS
Level 2CABS:
ExaminingStudent work
Level 3CABS:
FormativeFeedback
Year 12003-04 101 38 53 9 0 1
Year 22004-05 105 9 20 53 21 2
Survey Results: April 2005
Number of Schools at Each Stage of the Continuum