military decision making process (mar 08) 1

49
The Military The Military Decision Making Decision Making Process Process March 2008 FM 5-0, June 2005 FM 34-130, 1994

Upload: thomas-cleary

Post on 28-Oct-2014

86 views

Category:

Technology


5 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

The Military Decision The Military Decision Making ProcessMaking Process

March 2008

FM 5-0, June 2005FM 34-130, 1994

Page 2: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Military Decision-Making Process

Receipt of Mission(Initial Assessment)

Mission Analysis

COA Development

COA Comparison

COA Analysis(War-game)

Orders Production

COA Approval

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-1 thru 3-3

• A planning model that establishes procedures for analyzing a mission, developing, analyzing, and comparing courses of action against criteria of success and each other, selecting the optimum course of action, and producing a plan or order

• Applies across the spectrum of conflict and range of military operations

• Helps organize the thought process of commanders and staff

Page 3: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Roles of Commander & Staff

• The commander is in charge of the military decision-making process and decides what procedures to use in each situation.

• The commander’s personal role is central: he disciplines the staff to meet the requirement of time, planning horizons, simplicity, and level of detail

• Commanders do this by visualizing (operational framework), describing (commanders intent, guidance, and CCIR), and directing (COA selection) operations

• Staff sections prepare and continuously update estimates and make sound recommendations to help the commander make decisions

• The CofS or XO manages, coordinates, and disciplines the staff’s work and provides quality control

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-4 thru 3-10

Page 4: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Commander’s Actions in MDMP

Staff Estimates(continual)

• Reinforces initial guidance to subordinate commanders

• Receives feedback on Warno 1

• Reinforces initial guidance to subordinate commanders

• Receives feedback on Warno 1

• Reinforces guidance• Receives feedback on Warno 2

• Reinforces guidance• Receives feedback on Warno 2

• Discusses approved COA w/ subordinate commanders

• Receives initial backbrief / feedback on Warno 3

• Discusses approved COA w/ subordinate commanders

• Receives initial backbrief / feedback on Warno 3

Commander’s Estimate

(continual)

RECEIPT OF MISSION• Issue Cdr’s Initial Guidance

RECEIPT OF MISSION• Issue Cdr’s Initial Guidance

MISSION ANALYSIS• Approve Restated Mission• State Commander’s Intent

• Approve Initial CCIR

MISSION ANALYSIS• Approve Restated Mission• State Commander’s Intent

• Approve Initial CCIR

COA DEVELOPMENTCOA DEVELOPMENT

COA ANALYSIS (War-game)COA ANALYSIS (War-game)

COA COMPARISONCOA COMPARISON

COA APPROVAL• Approve COA

• Refined CDRs Intent/CCIR• HPT List

COA APPROVAL• Approve COA

• Refined CDRs Intent/CCIR• HPT List

ORDERS PRODUCTION• Approve Order

ORDERS PRODUCTION• Approve Order

REHEARSALREHEARSAL

EXECUTION & ASSESSMENTEXECUTION & ASSESSMENT

WARNO 1 WARNO 1

WARNO 2 WARNO 2

WARNO 3 WARNO 3

Page 5: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Receipt of Mission

• MDMP begins with the receipt or deduction of a new mission by the commander and staff

• Purpose of this step it to plan the preparation

• Steps in receipt of mission are as follows . . .

– Operations Section issues a warning order staff to alert them of the pending planning process

– Staff prepares for mission analysis by gathering the tools

– Staff updates estimates

– Commander and staff conduct a quick initial assessment

– Commander issues his initial guidance and operational timeline

– Headquarters issues a warning order to subordinate and supporting units

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-12 thru 3-15

MDMP Step 1

Page 6: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Prepare for Mission Analysis

• Gather the tools . . .– Higher headquarters’

order– Maps of the area of

operations– Own and higher

headquarters’ SOPs– Appropriate Field

Manuals– Existing staff estimates– Other materials and

products required

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-13

Page 7: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Conduct an Initial Assessment• Determine the time available from mission receipt to mission

execution• Determine the time needed to plan, prepare for, and execute the

mission for own and subordinate units• Determine the intelligence preparation of the battlefield• Additional factors to consider . . .

– Ambient light requirements for planning, rehearsals, and movement

– The staff’s experience, cohesiveness, and level of rest or stress

• The critical product of this assessment is an initial allocation of available time

• Staff estimates already current and those that need updating• Time required to position critical elements-to include C2 nodes-

for the upcoming operation

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-13

Page 8: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Issue Commander’s Initial Guidance

• How to abbreviate the MDMP, if required

• Initial time allocation• Necessary coordination to

perform, including LNOs to dispatch

• Initial IR or CCIR• Authorized movement• Additional tasks the

commander wants the staff to do

• Collaborative planning times and locations

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-15

Page 9: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Issue a Warning Order• Issued to subordinate and supporting units

• Uses the five-paragraph format

• Includes as a minimum . . .

– Type of operation (such as offensive or defensive)

– General location of the operation

– Initial time line

– Movement or reconnaissance to initiate

– Any collaborative planning sessions directed by the commander

– Initial IR or CCIR, and ISR tasks

Page 10: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Mission Analysis

• Allows the commander to begin his battlefield visualization

• The result is to define the tactical problem and beginning the process of determining feasible solutions

• The commander conducts his own mission analysis so that he has a frame of reference

• Anticipation and prior preparation are keys to a timely mission analysis

• A thorough mission analysis is crucial to planning

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-15

MDMP Step 2

Page 11: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Mission Analysis Steps

1. Analyze the higher headquarters' order.

2. Conduct initial IPB.

3. Determine specified, implied & essential tasks.

4. Review available assets.

5. Determine constraints.

6. Identify critical facts and assumptions.

7. Conduct risk assessment.

8. Determine initial CCIR.

9. Determine initial recon annex.

10. Plan for available time.

11. Write the restated mission.

12. Conduct a mission analysis briefing.

13. Approve the restated mission.

14. Develop the initial commander’s intent.

15. Issue the commander’s guidance.

16. Issue a warning order.

17. Review facts & assumptions.

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-16 thru 3-29

Page 12: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Analyze the Higher HQ’s Order

• Thoroughly analyze the higher headquarters' order to establish horizontal and vertical nesting, not just for maneuver, but also for all combat support and combat service support

• Misinterpretation results in wasted time; seek clarification immediately• Commander and staff must ensure they completely understand . . .

– Higher and two-higher headquarters’ . . .• Commander’s intent• Mission• Concept of operation, including deception plan• Time line for mission execution• Available assets• Area of Operations

– Missions of adjacent units– Assigned area of operations

Mission Analysis Step 1

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-16

Page 13: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Conduct Initial IPB

• IPB is the systematic, continuous process of analyzing the threat and the effects of the environment of the unit

• Designed to support the staff estimate and MDMP

• Analytical methodology employed as part of intelligence planning to reduce uncertainties concerning the enemy, environment, and terrain for all types of operations

• Staff officers must assist the S-2 in developing IPB products to include SITTEMPs within their own areas of expertise or functional area

• IPB starts during mission analysis, refined during the rest of the MDMP, and is continuous throughout preparation and execution of operations

Mission Analysis Step 2

FM 5-0, 2005, p. 3-17 thru 3-18

Page 14: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Define the Battlefield Environment

• Identifying for further analysis specific features of the environment or activities within it, and the physical space where they exist.

• Define the battlefield environment– Identify significant characteristics of the environment– Identify the limits of the command’s AO and battle space– Establish the limits of the AI– Evaluate existing data bases and identify intelligence gaps– Collect the material and intelligence required to conduct the

remainder of IPB

FM 34-130, 1994, p. 1-1 & 2-1

IPB Step 1

Page 15: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Area of Operations

• Where the Commander is given authority and responsibility to conduct military operations

• Assigned by higher based on METT-T• Defined by boundaries• Of sufficient size to allow completion of mission• Limits freedom of maneuver

Page 16: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Area of Interest

• Geographical area from which information and intelligence are required to execute successful tactical operations and to plan for future operations. – Threats ability to project power– Threats ability to move forces into AO– Amount of time needed to accomplish friendly mission

• That part of the battlefield which contains significant terrain features or enemy units and weapon systems that may affect your unit’s near or future battle

Page 17: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Area of Interest

AI

Area of OperationsX

Not within AI

30 km

30 km

30 km

30 km

30 km

30 kmWithin AI

Page 18: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Area of Interest

• AI should be large enough to answer the commander’s Information Requirements; yet small enough to prevent analytical efforts from becoming unfocused

• Determining the AI depends on the unit mission and threat capabilities

• Considerations for your AI should be expressed in terms of distance, based on:

– How your unit attacks– How the enemy attacks– What your commander needs to know

Page 19: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

AI with terrain considerations

Area of Operations

AI

HWY

1

2

3

TRAIL

Page 20: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Describe the Battlefield’s Effects

FM 34-130, 1994, p. 1-2 & 2-1

IPB Step 2

• The determination of how the battlefield environment affects both threat and friendly operations.

• Describes how the terrain, weather, and other battlefield aspects affect friendly and enemy fires and movement.

Describe the battlefield’s effects [MCOO]– Analyze the battlefield environment.

• terrain analysis (OAKOC)• weather analysis• analysis of other characteristics of the battlefield (e.g.

population status)– Describe the battlefield’s effects on threat and friendly capabilities

and broad COAs

Page 21: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Terrain Analysis

• Terrain team (Engineers)

• Evaluate terrain through map analysis

• Evaluate terrain through reconnaissance

Affect on military operations (Friendly and Threat)

Page 22: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Terrain Analysis

• Cross-country movement overlay• Drainage overlay• Lines of communications (roads,

rail, waterways)• Military aspects of terrain

(OCOKA / OAKOC)– Aerial photos– Line of site (LOS) index

Page 23: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Cross Country Mobility

• Percent Slope (hills, mountains)

• Vegetation (trees, forests, swamps)

• Water (streams, lakes, rivers)

• Soil (gravel, sand, clay, peat)

Affected By:

Page 24: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Describe the Battlefield Effects

(Military Aspects of Terrain)

• Classify terrain as it pertains to maneuverability into one of three categories:– UNRESTRICTED. Free of any restriction to movement.

Units maneuver at doctrinal speeds/distances. Nothing needs to be done to enhance mobility.

– RESTRICTED. Terrain hinders movement. Units must adjust doctrinal distances or speeds. Some effort required to enhance mobility .

– SEVERELY RESTRICTED. Terrain severely hinders movement. Units cannot travel at doctrinal distances and speeds.

Page 25: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Mobility Classifications

• Unrestricted: 0-30% slope

– Free of restrictions

• Restricted: 31-45% slope

– Hinders movement; little effort needed to enhance mobility

– Use march formation with only minimal delay

• Severely Restricted: >45% slope

– Severely hinders / slows movement unless some effort is made to enhance mobility

– examples: minefields, cities, heavily wooded areas

Page 26: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

LOA (PL Gold)

PL Zinc

PL Silver

XX

X

X

Page 27: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Military Aspects of Terrain

• Obstacles

• Avenues of Approach

• Key Terrain

• Observation and Fields of Fire

• Cover and Concealment

Page 28: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

LOA (PL Gold)

PL Zinc

PL Silver

XX

X

X

Page 29: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

70

K

• Outline terrain in Purple or Blue. • Identify with a “K” in the center of the outline. • Include in the legend.

Key Terrain

Any locality or area the seizure, retention, or control of which affords a marked advantage to either combatant.

Must be evaluated by assessing the impact of its seizure by either force upon results of battle.

Varies with the level of command.

Page 30: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Avenues of Approach

An air or ground route of an attacking force of dimension, leading to an objective (terrain or troop)

OBJ

AA 1

AAA 1

• Axis of Advance to the objective

• Good communications

• Some cover and concealment

• Little canalization

• Reasonable mobility

Provide:

* Identified for both AIR and GROUND

Page 31: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Mobility Corridors

Evaluate & Prioritize

X

OBJ

K

K A

B

C

DF

X

X

OB

J

AA 1

AA 2

Page 32: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

LOA (PL Gold)

PL Zinc

PL Silver

XX

X

X

II

II

II

II

I

I

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

IIII

X

X

II

IIII

AA3C

AA4A

AA4B

AA3B

K1

K3

K7a

K7b

K4

K5

K6

K8

K9

K2

Page 33: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

LOA (PL Gold)

PL Zinc

PL Silver

XX

X

XAA3C

AA4A

AA4B

AA3B II

II

II

II

I

I

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

IIII

X

X

II

IIII

K1

K3

K7a

K7b

K4

K5

K6

K8

K9

K2

Page 34: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Describe the Battlefield Effects

(Military Aspects of Terrain)

• Other aspects of the Battlefield include: – Logistical Infrastructure (Sources of potable

water, power production facilities, natural resources, communications system, transportation system)

– Population Demographics (Education levels, cultural distinctions, religious beliefs)

– Economic Conditions– Politics (Local, regional and international,

treaties, ‘unofficial’ politics (gangs, warlords))

Page 35: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

LINE OF SIGHTLINE OF SIGHT

OP CASEY

OP TONY HILL 466

OP BONE

Page 36: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Describe the Battlefield Effects

• Military aspects of weather – Visibility

– Winds

– Precipitation

– Cloud Cover

– Temperature and Humidity

Page 37: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Visibility

• Provides concealment

• Favors the offense

• Impedes R&S

• Hinders target acquisition

Reduced Visibility:

Page 38: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Light Data

A major factor in evaluating visibility is the amount of available light

Date BMNT SR SS EENT MR MS % Illum 10 0600 0641 1722 1803 2309 111058 3 11 0559 0640 1723 1804 120004 121153 60

Page 39: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Wind

• Reduce visibility

• Limit Airborne and Aviation Ops

• Impair Communications

• Affect Smoke and Chemical Ops

Strong Winds:

Page 40: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Precipitation

• Maneuver

• Visibility

• Electronic & Optical Systems

• Personnel

Heavy rain or snow can impact:

Page 41: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Cloud Cover

• Limits Illumination• Limits Solar Heating of targets for IR

systems• Degrades Target Acquisition• Hinders IR Guided Weapon Systems• Limits Aviation Ops

Page 42: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Temperature and Humidity

• Impact the capabilities of personnel and equipment

• Reduce aircraft payloads

• Increase dependence on logistical support

Extremes of either may:

Page 43: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Thermal Crossover

• Temperatures of targets and objects on the battlefield at night are important for the use of thermal sights and forward looking infrared (FLIR) devices.

• A difference in temperature or thermal contrast is required for these devices to "see" a target.

• Normally, heating and cooling are at a different rate for the target and background.

• Twice a day, in the morning and evening, targets without internal heating come to relatively the same temperature as the background.

• During thermal crossover the thermal device does not have the capability to "see" the target.

• Time of thermal crossover may be only a few seconds when the morning sun strikes a target, or for several minutes on cloudy adverse weather days; this depends on the threshold temperature's contrast required by the thermal device.

• Tactical decision aids can be used to predict these temperature differences for planners and estimate length of thermal crossover periods.

Page 44: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Temperature Inversion

• In the weather phenomenon known as thermal inversion, a layer of cooler air is trapped near the ground by a layer of warmer air above.

• During the periods of temperature inversion which often follow BMNT, it is possible to rapidly cover a very large area with dense smoke and non-persistent chemical agents will take longer to dissipate.

Page 45: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Battlefield Effects

Terrain analysis MCOO

Weather analysis Weather ChartOther characteristics

EFFECTS

The “SO WHAT”

Page 46: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Visibility/Prec

0600 1200 1800 2400

CEILING: NONEVISIBILITY: .8 KMPRECIPITATION: LT FREEZING RAIN

CEILING: NONEVISIBILITY: 3 KMPRECIPITATION: LT FREEZING RAIN

CEILING: 1200 M VISIBILITY: 18 KM PRECIPITATION: LT RAIN

CEILING: 1500 MVISIBILITY: 20 KMPRECIPITATION: NONE

1008 46 F59 F59 F46 F

23%

SS:1800MS:0705MR:0142 SR:0712

BMNT:0646 EENT: 1825

Precipitation

Significant Impacts: Good Concealment at night due to low illumination, rain and fog limit visibility from until 1200

TEMP WIND TEMP WIND TEMP WIND

10TEMP WIND

04

FOG LIFTING FOG CLOUDY CLOUDY

0000

Wind Direction

RW AVN

SMOKE

Dismounts

RISTAWheeledTracks

ADA

Chem Wind Direction

Visibility/Ceiling

Visibility

Visibility

Visibility

Wind Direction Wind Direction

Wind Direction Wind Direction

Wind Direction

Visibility

Visibility

Visibility Visibility

Visibility

Visibility

PrecipitationPrecipitation

Visibility/Ceiling

PrecipitationPrecipitation

Visibility/Ceiling

Wind Direction

Wind Direction

Visibility/Prec Visibility/Prec

Wind DirectionWind DirectionWind Direction

PrecipitationPrecipitation

ENEMYUS

0600 1200 1800 2400

Page 47: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

WEATHER EFFECTS ON FRIENDLY

+Increased detection, recognition, and identification ranges for thermal imaging systems+Brigade has thermal overmatch against the OPFOR from ______to_______.+Low illum (<23%) after 2200 supports aerial insertions-Winds support enemy use of Chemical Munitions-Only 12 hours, 59 minutes of useable daylight-Limited Image Intensifying Night Vision System Usage-Limited Operations during the hours of darkness-Big Changes in Barometric pressure may affect gunnery accuracy-Short days, long nights, combined with low illum levels and late Moon Rise will result in decreased total engineer effort-Unfamiliarity with terrain combined with low ilum after 2230 (<23%) will slow BRT/Scout Infiltration-High Wind gusts during hours of darkness may affect UAV launch and SIGINT Antenna Height -High winds may affect accuracy of M1/M2 ammo at max effective range-High winds may affect Artillery accuracy due to extended time of flight

WEATHER EFFECTS

Page 48: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

WEATHER EFFECTS ON ENEMY

+Wind direction supports use of Chemical Munitions

+Low illum (<23%) will conceal enemy troop concentrations

+Low Illum after 2145 (MS) will support recon infiltration

-Lack of TIS will affect enemy movement tempo during hours of

reduced illum

-Low ceilings and reduced vis will affect use of rotary wing AC (SOKOL) until

after 1000 local

-High winds after 2200 may affect enemy ability to conduct air insertion of

infantry (resort to multiple truck insertions)

-Low illum after 2200 reduces target acquisition of shoulder fired SAM system

WEATHER EFFECTS

Page 49: Military Decision Making Process (Mar 08) 1

Evaluate the Threat

• The determination of threat force capabilities and the doctrinal principle, tactics, techniques, and procedure threat forces prefer to use

Evaluate the Threat [Doctrinal Templates]– Update or create threat models

• convert threat doctrine or pattern of operation to graphics (doctrinal template)

• describe threat tactics and options• identify high value targets (HVTs)

– Identify threat capabilities

FM 34-130, 1994, p. 1-2 & 2-1

IPB Step 3