migrant samples in the ginps: sampling and method bias

32
Migrant samples in the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey Arjen de Wit Exchange meeting German Centre of Gerontology (DZA), Berlin November 4, 2013 Sampling and method bias

Upload: arjen-de-wit

Post on 20-Jun-2015

153 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at the exchange meeting at German Centre of Gerontology (DZA), Berlin, November 4, 2013

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Migrant samples in theGiving in the Netherlands Panel Survey

Arjen de WitExchange meeting German Centre of

Gerontology (DZA), BerlinNovember 4, 2013

Sampling and method bias

Page 2: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Our experiences with...

Sampling of migrants in the GINPS Method effects in data analysis Issues in questionnaire design

Page 3: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Migrants in the GINPS

Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey Migrant cross-sectional sample from 2008 Turks, Moroccans, Surinamese and Antilleans In 2008, Afghans too N > 140 per group

Page 4: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Migrants in the GINPS

Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey Migrant cross-sectional sample from 2008 Turks, Moroccans, Surinamese and Antilleans In 2008, Afghans too N > 140 per group

Page 5: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Sampling

Quota sampling Snowballing, but different groups (families,

tribes) may dislike each other Incentives CAWI preferred among native Dutch Complemented with CAPI

Page 6: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Sampling

CAWI CAPI

N % N %

Turkish 108 20 41 23Moroccan 93 17 46 26Surinam 105 19 42 24Antillean 98 18 44 25Dutch 139 26 2 1

Age: 18-29 107 20 64 36Age: 30-44 235 43 50 28Age: >45 201 37 64 36

Lower educated 104 19 76 43Middle educated 302 56 81 46Higher educated 137 25 21 12

Page 7: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Sampling

CAWI CAPI

N % N %

Turkish 108 20 41 23Moroccan 93 17 46 26Surinam 105 19 42 24Antillean 98 18 44 25Dutch 139 26 2 1

Age: 18-29 107 20 64 36Age: 30-44 235 43 50 28Age: >45 201 37 64 36

Lower educated 104 19 76 43Middle educated 302 56 81 46Higher educated 137 25 21 12

Page 8: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Weighting

Age Education Household size Region

Page 9: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Weighting

Page 10: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Example: empathic concern

Measured on a 5 points scale– I often feel concern for people who are less

fortunate materially than me– Other people's problems do not usually bother

me– Other people's misfortune does not usually

bother me– I am often touched by what other people go

through

Page 11: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Example: empathic concern

Unweighted Weighted1

2

3

4

5

MigrantsNon-migrants

Page 12: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Example: empathic concern

Unweighted Weighted1

2

3

4

5

MigrantsNon-migrants

(F(1, 714) = 5.48, p = 0.02)

Page 13: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Example: empathic concern

Unweighted Weighted1

2

3

4

5

MigrantsNon-migrants

F(1, 713) = 4.29, p = 0.04F(1, 714) = 5.48, p = 0.02

Page 14: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

BREAKING

Migrants are more empathicAMSTERDAM – Values of empathic concern

are more strongly developed among migrants than among native Dutch, VU University research shows.

Page 15: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Example: empathic concern

I II III

Migrant (0/1) 0.15 *(0,06)

0,11(0,07)

0,03(0,07)

0,12(0,06)

0,08(0,06)

0,27 **(0,05)

Unstandardized regression coefficientsStandard errors in parentheses* p < 0.05** p < 0.01

Page 16: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Example: empathic concern

I II III

Migrant (0/1) 0.15 *(0.06)

0.11(0.07)

0,03(0,07)

CAPI (0/1) 0.12(0.06)

0,08(0,06)

Being religious (0/1) 0,27 **(0,05)

Unstandardized regression coefficientsStandard errors in parentheses* p < 0.05** p < 0.01

Page 17: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Example: empathic concern

I II III

Migrant (0/1) 0.15 *(0.06)

0.11(0.07)

0.03(0.07)

CAPI (0/1) 0.12(0.06)

0.08(0.06)

Being religious (0/1) 0.27 **(0.05)

Unstandardized regression coefficientsStandard errors in parentheses* p < 0.05** p < 0.01

Page 18: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire

Modules– Values– Household giving– Individual giving– Zakath and sadaqah– Self-reported altruism – Vignette experiment

– Attitudes– Volunteering– Informal helping– Global citizenship– Remitttances– Background

Page 19: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: translating

Translate the questionnaire into Turkish, Arabic, Polish, ...

Includes people who don't speak Dutch But can annoy respondents who do

Page 20: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: donations

Household donations to organizations– Methods; areas; org's; areas (goods); local

causes Individual donations to organizations

– Methods of solicitation; methods of giving Remittances

– Recipients; areas; recipients (goods); areas (goods); gifts/loans/business

Zakath and sadaqah

Page 21: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: donations

Money Goods Zakath Sadaqah Remittances0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

MigrantsNative Dutch

Mean yearly amount in euros among donors, weighted

Page 22: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: donations

Money Goods Zakath Sadaqah Remittances0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

MigrantsNative Dutch

Mean yearly amount in euros among donors, weighted

Page 23: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: donations

Money Goods Zakath Sadaqah Remittances0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

MigrantsNative Dutch

Mean yearly amount in euros among donors, weighted

Page 24: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: donations

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

Remittances over 4000 euros per year

Page 25: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: donations

What are charitable donations in the eyes of migrants and non-migrants?

Are Zakath and Sadaqah part of it? Are remittances part of it? And are donations to organizations part of

Zakath and Sadaqah?

Page 26: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: volunteering

Area module for volunteering in organizations– Areas; asked to volunteer; activities; hours;

statements Informal helping

– Activities; recipients; hours

Page 27: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: volunteering

Volunteering Informal helping0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

MigrantsNative Dutch

%

Page 28: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: volunteering

Volunteering Informal helping0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

MigrantsNative Dutch

%

Page 29: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: overlapping concepts?

17%

38% 3%

1%

Giving

24%

4%

7% Informal helping6%

Volunteering

Page 30: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Questionnaire issues: volunteering

What is volunteering in the eyes of migrants and non-migrants?

Is informal helping part of it? People may be annoyed by a question like 'Do

you sometimes ask your family for help?'

Page 31: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Conclusions

Different sampling strategies......leading to possible bias in results

Migrant groups may have different conceptions of 'donating' and 'volunteering'

Direct, unorganized ways of participating are more common among migrant groups...

… so measure them

Page 32: Migrant samples in the GINPS: Sampling and method bias

Arjen de Wit

Center for Philanthropic StudiesVU University Amsterdam

[email protected]