midterm 1b results mean = 26.4 minimal score : 9 maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

20
Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score.

Upload: bathsheba-martin

Post on 05-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Midterm 1b Results

Mean = 26.4Minimal score : 9Maximal score: 3762 students improved their score.

Page 2: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Habitat Mosaic:

Page 3: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Source and Sink Populations:

High value habitat

Lower value habitat

Note: populations are too far apart, dispersal

too infrequent, to establish IDF.

Page 4: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Golden-mantled ground squirrel

Highest elevation: near the timberline, late snowmelt

Lowest elevation: lush forests, early snowmelt

Page 5: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

At the highest elevation (2730 m):

emergence from hibernation: late May newborn females take two seasons to maturefemales are larger at first reproductionaverage litter size: 4.518% of pregnancies survived to 1 year-old

At the lowest elevation (1460 m):

emergence from hibernation: early Aprilnewborns take one season to maturefemales are smaller at first reproductionaverage litter size: 5.318% of pregnancies survived to 1 year-old

Metapopulations in the Sierra Nevada:

Bronson 1979

Page 6: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Highest elevation: R0 = 0.998

Lowest Elevation: R0 = 1.01

Net reproductive rates:

Page 7: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

A sink-population:

A deme within a metapopulation where mortality exceeds birth rates. Habitats remain occupied onlydue to immigration.

A source-population:

A deme within a metapopulation where birth rates exceed mortality. Surplus individuals leave this habitat to settle (breed) elsewhere.

Rescue Effect:

The persistence of a deme with negative population growth through the influx of immigrants.

Page 8: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Source and Sink Populations:

High value habitat:R0 > 1 source

Lower value habitatR0 < 1 sink

Net m

igration

Page 9: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Source and Sink Populations:

Source population: b>d and i > e

Sink population: b<d and i< e

N(t+1) = (1+b-d+e-i) N(t)

Page 10: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

What are the implications for source-sink structure in a metapopulation for stability and persistence?

Do sink populations constitute a “drain” on a metapopulation?

Do sink populations still provide the safety in numbers?

Do sinks always remain sinks, and sources always sources?

Where do most individuals reside, in source or sink populations?

Page 11: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Eastern kingbird(Tyrannus tyrannus)

Rivers, floodplains, uplands and farmer’s fields

Page 12: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Survivorship:

Murphy 2001

The floodplain is the safest habitat for adult birds.

Page 13: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Reproductive success:

Murphy 2001

Reproduction was slightly lower in the floodplain (Clutch sizes were the same but the floodplain had more egg predators.

Page 14: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Population growth rates:

Murphy 2001

In the year of the study, populations growth was positive only on the floodplain.

Floodplain >> Creek > Upland

Page 15: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Dispersal probabilities:

Murphy 2001

Most net dispersal happens from the floodplain to the creek.

Creek and Upland are local sinks.The floodplain is the local source.

From habitat:

Page 16: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Nu

mb

er o

f p

airs

50-year simulation based on actual population growth and dispersal parameters:

Best model fit was achieved assuming a 5% immigration rate from the outside into the upland population.

Still, the Charlotte Valley Kingbird population was predicted to decline:It is a regional sink!

Page 17: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Nu

mb

er o

f p

airs

What does it take to stabililize the Charlotte Valley kingbird population?

- 5% increase in survivorship in creek populations ? -

The creek population became a local source, and stabilized the floodplain population.

Page 18: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

The Charlotte Valley kingbird study shows that:

Most members of the metapopulation may live in sinkpopulations, i.e. habitats that, if isolated, would not

support the species.

Relatively small improvements in a fraction of the totalhabitat, including a sink habitat, can help maintain larger portions of the metapopulation.

Local source populations may be part of a metapopulation that is itself a sink on a larger spatial scale.

Page 19: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Excel Worksheets:

• Source-Sink populations

Page 20: Midterm 1b Results Mean = 26.4 Minimal score : 9 Maximal score: 37 62 students improved their score

Summary:

Not all demes would support viable populations on their own.

• sink population = not viable by itself• source population = viable, generates dispersers

Even so, because sink populations also remain occupied most of the time, they

• increase total population size (genetic diversity etc.)• reduce the risk of regional extinction• can help restart source populations after a local extinction.

Thus, sink populations can stabilize meta-populations.