middle level education
DESCRIPTION
Middle Level Education. Kyrene School District November 2007. Middle Level Research. Components of Exemplary Middle Schools -Interdisciplinary teaming -Advisory programs -Varied instruction -Exploratory programs -Transition programs. Historical Information. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Middle Level Education
Kyrene School DistrictNovember 2007
![Page 2: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Middle Level Research
Components of Exemplary Middle Schools-Interdisciplinary teaming-Advisory programs-Varied instruction-Exploratory programs-Transition programs
![Page 3: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Historical Information
Changed from Junior Highs to Middle Schools in late 1980’s
School specific programs/schedules existed until late 1990’s
Consistent schedule implemented approx. 1998
Current schedule approved in March 2005 General reasons for changing the schedule-Need for improved student achievement-Potential Cost Savings -Better preparation for High School
![Page 4: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Current Information
Characteristics of Middle School Schedule:-5-period day -68 minute periods-4 daily Core Subjects -Academic Lab-2 Electives, on A/B rotation
![Page 5: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Middle School Schedule Research Study
Conducted by Dr. David Garcia, ASU Assistant Professor
Evaluation Phases-Phase 1:Implementation-Phase 2:Maturation-Phase 3:Outcomes
![Page 6: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Research Study Details
Phase 1 (2005-2006)
o On-line survey of Teachers (187 of 305)
o One-on-one interviews with randomly selected principals (3 of 6)
o 6 focus groups with students (Academic Lab)
o 3 focus groups with Exploratory teachers
![Page 7: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Phase 1 Findings
Language Arts teachers Reported pressure of teaching all objectives with less time
Less likely to try new methods Unable to cover same amount of curriculum
Were unclear on what Language Arts objectives were to be integrated and reinforced in other core content areas
![Page 8: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Phase 1 Findings (continued)
Math, Science & /Soc. Studies teacherso Reported they could cover more material
o Indicated they could try new methods
o Reported having more individual time w/ students
o Reported lack of clarity on what Language Arts objectives they were to integrate and reinforce
![Page 9: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Phase 1 Findings (continued)
Exploratory teachers: Reported problems trying new methods
Perceived the model had negative impact on time to teach
Indicated students learn better with daily classes
![Page 10: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Phase 1 Findings (continued)
Principals Reported more time in core classes was beneficial.
![Page 11: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Phase 1 Findings (continued)
Academic Lab teachers: Almost all teachers reported not being
prepared to use Academic Lab productively Less than half said they received guidance
(resulted in large variation in classes)
Principals Described A.L as purely academic and felt
teachers were responsible for implementation
![Page 12: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Phase 1 Findings (continued)
Spanish & Music teachers Researcher concluded may have been the most negatively impacted
![Page 13: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Phase 1 Findings (continued)
Teachers Perceived little impact on reducing discipline referrals.
Of the 47% of all teachers that noticed a change in discipline referrals 77% indicated they thought the number of referrals had increased
Principals Reported campuses to be calmer (less transition time)
![Page 14: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Phase 1 Findings (continued)
Teacher Professional Satisfaction o Indicated Kyrene was a good place to work (81%)
o Validated their observations about the schedule was about the schedule and not dissatisfaction with the District
![Page 15: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Phase 1 Findings (continued)
Students Considered Academic Lab as detached from rest of subjects and questioned purpose
Reflected the level of teacher buy-in was related to the quality of the program
Generally did not refer to activities as enrichment or innovative
![Page 16: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Research Study Details
Phase 2 (2006-2007)
-Teacher focus groups in 3 randomly selected middle schools by grade
![Page 17: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Phase 2 Findings
- Major findings related to implementation of Academic Lab
More consistency between teacher activities and the purpose of Academic Lab.
Increased evidence of teachers’ ability to differentiate instruction for individual students
Evidence of teachers’ taking advantage of the flexibility provided in Academic Lab.
Increased integration of Exploratory teachers into Academic Lab activities (Academic Lab is staffed by core subject teachers)
Provided a favorable comparison of this year to last year
![Page 18: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Phase 2 Findings (continued)
Academic Lab is being implemented as intended by the District
Schools have general guidelines they are following which has resulted in more consistency in class time (Examples include academic assistance days, silent reading, Character Counts)
There is variation across teacher teams on a day to day implementation and experience was very team specific (intended)
![Page 19: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Phase 2 Findings (continued)
Problem with “pull-out” days (exploratory teachers pull groups of students for additional instruction and practice)
Don't know how many students will be in class and who will be in class, so it's challenging to have a structured activity -Students who remain in the classroom on the "pull-out" days may not be involved in an activity consistent with the intent and spirit of Academic Lab (certain schools have worked this out by agreement on days for “pull out” and differentiated plans for students who remain in the Academic Lab).
![Page 20: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Phase 2 Findings (continued)
What is working well-Academic assistance for kids -Pre-planned activities
Not enough time to plan for and teach Character Counts (effective schools integrate these concepts into the overall school program)
Students are not staying engaged in some activities due to the fact they recognize no grade is given (some teams have determined how to use assignments in Academic Lab for a grade in a core class)
![Page 21: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Phase 3 Design
Increase % of proficient students & reduce % of novice in Reading, Writing & Math.
Reduce variability in academic achievement among schools (% of meeting/exceeding, proficient, novice)
Other Academic Indicators-Increase % from Meets to Exceeds and from Falling Behind to Approaching -Look at high school placement
Data Sources
-AIMS and MSS/CASS for 2005/2006, 2006/2007, 2007/2008
-High School transcripts
![Page 22: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Phase 3 Design (continued)
Maintain or reduce # of disciplinary referrals. -Data Source: District discipline
records for class and passing to class
Maintain high level of teacher professional satisfaction
-Data Source: On-line teacher survey (April 2006, April 2008)
![Page 23: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Next Steps
Finalize design of phase 3 Begin collecting data Analyze data and write report (summer 2008)
Present report (fall 2008)
![Page 24: Middle Level Education](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070407/568142f6550346895daf4f5b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Questions