mid-infrared semiconductor laser based trace gas ... · innovative long path, small volume...
TRANSCRIPT
Mid-infrared semiconductor laser based trace gas technologies: recent advances and applicationstechnologies: recent advances and applications
F. K. Tittel1, R. Lewicki1,4, M. Jahjah1, P. Stefanski1,4, J. Tarka1,4, L. Gong2, R. Griffin2 S. So4, D.Thomazy4 W. Jiang1, J. Zhang1,6, P.
OUTLINE
g , , y g , g ,Lane5, R.Talbot5
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA
3 Laser and Fiber Electronics Group, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, Wroclaw, Poland
UAB I ti
4 Sentinel Photonics, Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852, USA5 University of Houston, Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Houston, TX 77204, USA
6 Northeast Forestry University, Department of Electromechanical Engineering, Harbin, China
• New Laser Based Trace Gas Sensor TechnologyInnovative Forum
Center for Optical
• New Laser Based Trace Gas Sensor Technology Novel Multipass Absorption Cell & ElectronicsQuartz Enhanced Photoacoustic Spectroscopy
l f id f d hip
Sensors and Spectroscopies Birmingham
AL
• Examples of Mid-Infrared Sensor Architectures C2H6, NH3, NO, CO, and SO2Future Directions of Laser Based Gas Sensor
May 14, 2013
Research support by NSF ERC MIRTHE, NSF-ANR NexCILAS, the Robert Welch Foundation, Scinovation, Inc., Testo AG and Sentinel Photonics Inc. via an EPA Phase 1 SBIR sub-award is acknowledged
Technology and Conclusions
Wide Range of Trace Gas Sensing Applications• Urban and Industrial Emission Measurements• Urban and Industrial Emission Measurements
Industrial PlantsCombustion Sources and Processes (e.g. fire detection)Automobile Truck Aircraft and Marine EmissionsAutomobile, Truck, Aircraft and Marine Emissions
• Rural Emission MeasurementsAgriculture & Forestry, Livestocki i i• Environmental Monitoring
Atmospheric Chemistry (e.g isotopologues, climate modeling,…)Volcanic Emissions
• Chemical Analysis and Industrial Process ControlPetrochemical, Semiconductor, Pharmaceutical, Metals Processing, Food & Beverage Industries; Nuclear Technology & Safeguards
• Spacecraft and Planetary Surface MonitoringCrew Health Maintenance & Life Support
• Applications in Medical Diagnostics and the Life Sciences pp g• Technologies for Law Enforcement, Defense and Security• Fundamental Science and Photochemistry
Laser based Trace Gas Sensing Techniques • Optimum Molecular Absorbing Transition• Optimum Molecular Absorbing Transition
Overtone or Combination Bands (NIR)Fundamental Absorption Bands (Mid-IR)
• Long Optical PathlengthMultipass Absorption Cell (White, Herriot, Chernin, Sentinel Photonics))Cavity Enhanced and Cavity Ringdown SpectroscopyOpen Path Monitoring (with retro-reflector): Standoff and Remote DetectionRemote Detection Fiberoptic Evanescent Wave Spectroscopy
• Spectroscopic Detection SchemesFrequency or Wavelength ModulationBalanced DetectionZero-air SubtractionPhotoacoustic & Quartz Enhanced Photoacoustic Spectroscopy (QEPAS)
Other spectroscopic methods
• Faraday Rotation Spectroscopy (limited to paramagnetic chemical species)
• Differential Optical Dispersion Spectroscop (DODiS)• Differential Optical Dispersion Spectroscopy (DODiS)• Noise Immune Cavity Enhanced-Optical Heterodyne
Molecular Spectroscopy (NICE-OHMS)p py ( )• Frequency Comb Spectroscopy • Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)
HITRAN Simulated Mid-Infrared Molecular Absorption Spectra
CO: 4.66 µm CH2O: 3.6 µm
CO2: 4.2 µm
COS: 4.86 µm
NO: 5.26 µm
µ
CH4: 3.3 µm
3.1 µm5.5 µm
NH3: 10.6 µm O3: 10 µmN20, CH4: 7.66 µm
12.5 µm 7.6 µm
Source: HITRAN 2000 database
Mid-IR Source Requirements for Laser Spectroscopy
REQUIREMENTS IR LASER SOURCE
Sensitivity (% to ppt) Optimum Wavelength, Power
Selectivity (Spectral Resolution) Stable Single Mode Operation and Narrow Linewidth
Multi-gas Components, Multiple Absorption Lines and Broadband Absorbers
Mode Hop-free WavelengthTunability
Directionality or Cavity Mode Matching
Beam Quality
Rapid Data Acquisition Fast Time Response
Room Temperature Operation High wall plug efficiency, no cryogenics lior cooling water
Field deployable in harsh environments
Compact & Robust
Key Characteristics of Mid-IR QCL & ICL Sources – May 2013
• Band – structure engineered devices Emission wavelength is determined by layer thickness – MBE or MOCVD; Type I QCLs operate in the 3 to 24 µm spectral region; Type II and GaSb based ICLs can cover the 3 to 6 µm spectral range.
Compact, reliable, stable, long lifetime, and commercial availability Fabry-Perot (FP), single mode (DFB) and multi-wavelength devices
• Wide spectral tuning ranges in the mid-IR4
p g g1.5 cm-1 using injection current control for DFB devices10-20 cm-1 using temperature control for DFB devices ~100cm-1 using current and temperature control for QCL DFB Array ~ 525 cm-1 (22% of c.w.) using an external grating element and FP chips
ith h t d ti i d i l QCL DFB A
4 mm
with heterogeneous cascade active region design; also QCL DFB Array
• Narrow spectral linewidths CW: 0.1 - 3 MHz & <10kHz with frequency stabilization (0.0004 cm-1) Pulsed: ~ 300 MHz
• High pulsed and CW powers of QCLs at TEC/RT temperatures
Room temperature pulsed power of > 30 W with 27% wall plug p p p p gefficiency and CW powers of ~ 5 W with 21% wall plug efficiency > 1W, TEC CW DFB @ 4.6 µm > 600 mW (CW FP) @ RT; wall plug efficiency of ~17 % at 4.6 µm;
Improvements and New Capabilities of QCLs and ICLs
• Optimum wavelength ( > 3 to < 20 µm) and power ( >10 mw to < 1 W)at room temperature (> 15 ºC and < 30 ºC) with state-of-the-artfabrication/processing methods based on MBE and MOCVD, good wallplug efficiency and lifetime (> 20,000 hours) for detection sensitivitiesplug efficiency and lifetime (> 20,000 hours) for detection sensitivitiesfrom % to pptv with low electrical power budget
• Stable single TEM00 transverse and axial mode, CW and pulsed operationof mid-infrared laser sources (narrow linewidth of ~ 300 MHz to <10k )10kHz)
• Mode hop-free ultra-broad wavelength tunability for detection of broadband absorbers and multiple absorption lines based on external cavity ormid infrared semiconductor arraysmid-infrared semiconductor arrays
• Good beam quality for directionality and/or cavity mode matching.Implementation of innovative collimation concepts.
• Rapid data acquisition based on fast time responseRapid data acquisition based on fast time response • Compact, robust, readily commercially available and affordable in order
to be field deployable in harsh operating environments (temperature,pressure, etc…)
Motivation for Mid-infrared C2H6 Detection
• Atmospheric chemistry and climate Fossil fuel and biofuel consumption, bi b ibiomass burning,vegetation/soil,natural gas loss
• Oil and gas prospecting• Oil and gas prospecting • Application in medical breath analysis
(a non-invasive method to identify and monitor different diseases):
asthma, schizophremia,Lung cancer,llung cancer,vitamin E deficiency.
HITRAN absorption spectra of C H CH and H OHITRAN absorption spectra of C2H6, CH4, and H2O
C2H6 Detection with a 3.36 µm CW DFB LD using a Novel Compact Multipass Absorption Cell and Control Electronics
Innovative long path, small volume multipassgas cell:57 6m with 459 passes
Schematic of a C2H6 gas sensor using a Nanoplus 3.36 µm DFB laser diode as an excitation source. M – mirror, CL – collimating lens, DM – dichroic mirror, MC – multipass cell, L – lens, SCB – sensor control board.
gas cell:57.6m with 459 passes
2f WMS signal for a C2H6 line
1at 2976.8 cm-1
at a pressure of 200 Torr
MC dimensions: 17 x 6.5 x 5.5 (cm)Distance between the MGC mirrors: 13 cm
Minimum detectable C2H6 concentration is: ~ 130 pptv (1σ; 1 s time resolution)
NOAA Monitoring & Sampling Location: Alert, Nunavut, Canada
ALT, Ethane Concentration Measurements
General View on the FacilityLatitude: 82.4508º NorthLongitude: 62.5056º WestLongitude: 62.5056 WestElevation: 200.00 m
Motivation for NH3 Detection
• Atmospheric chemistry• Pollution gas monitoringg g• Monitoring NH3 concentrations in the exhaust
stream of NOx removal systems based on selective l i d i ( ) h icatalytic reduction (SCR) techniques
• Spacecraft related trace gas monitoringS i d i i & l• Semiconductor process monitoring & control
• Monitoring of industrial refrigeration facilitiesi i f i• Monitoring of gas separation processes
• Medical diagnostics (kidney & liver diseases)D i f i i l i• Detection of ammonium-nitrate explosives
Conventional PASCell is OPTIONAL!
Laser beam, power P
Cell is OPTIONAL!
V-effective volume
Absorption αModulated (P or λ) at for f/2
VfPQS α~
Sensitive microphone
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡ ×∆
α=
HzWcm-1
min
fPNNEA
⎦⎣∆ Hzf
Atmospheric NH3 Measurements using an EC-QCL PAS Sensor
NH3 sensor deployed at the UH MoodyTower rooftop monitoring site.
Schematic of a Daylight Solutions 10.36 µm CW TEC EC-QCL based PAS NH3 Sensor.pb
)
14
16
18
tion
(#/c
m3 )
40000
50000
NH3 Particle Number Concentrationo
(ppb
)
1 21 41 61 8
NH
3 m
ixin
g ra
tio (p
2
4
6
8
10
12
cle
Num
ber C
once
ntra
t
10000
20000
30000
NH
3 m
ixin
g ra
tio
02468
1 0
Diurnal profile of atmospheric NH3 levels in Houston, TX.
Comparison between NH3 and particle number concentration time series from July 19 to July 31 2012.
Time
0
Par
tic07/19 7/20 7/21 7/22 7/23 7/24 7/25 7/26 7/27 7/28 7/29 7/30 7/31H o u r o f d ay
fro m 7 /1 9 /1 2 to 7 /3 1 /1 2
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0
NH3 Detection due to a Fire resulting from a Truck Collision
Accidental release of NH3
ppb)
20
24
August 14, 2010
NH3 c
once
ntra
tion
(p
8
12
16
Hour of day
0 5 10 15 20
N
0
4
Downwind of the Houston Ship Channel
A chemical incident occurred at ~ 6 a.m. after two trucks collided on I-59. Both trucks caught fire. [www.chron.com]
yAugust 14, 2010
o d o t e ousto S p C a e
n (p
pb)
20
25
30
NH3 c
once
ntra
tion
10
15
Hour of daySeptember 17, 2010
0 5 10 15 200
5
Estimated hourly NH3 emission from the Houston Ship Channel area is about 0.25 ton. Mellqvist et al., (2007) Final Report, HARC Project H-53.
photo: Public Domain / RJN2
Sporadic increased NH3 Concentration Levels related to Emissions by the Parish Electric Power Plant, TX y ,
The Parish electric power plant is located near the Brazos River in Fort Bend County, Texas (~27 miles SW fromRiver in Fort Bend County, Texas ( 27 miles SW from
downtown Houston)
NH3 Detection due to a Fire resulting from a Truck Collision
Accidental release of NH3
ppb)
20
24
August 14, 2010
NH3 c
once
ntra
tion
(p
8
12
16
Hour of day
0 5 10 15 20
N
0
4
Downwind of the Houston Ship Channel
A chemical incident occurred at ~ 6 a.m. after two trucks collided on I-59. Both trucks caught fire. [www.chron.com]
yAugust 14, 2010
o d o t e ousto S p C a e
n (p
pb)
20
25
30
NH3 c
once
ntra
tion
10
15
Hour of daySeptember 17, 2010
0 5 10 15 200
5
Estimated hourly NH3 emission from the Houston Ship Channel area is about 0.25 ton. Mellqvist et al., (2007) Final Report, HARC Project H-53.
photo: Public Domain / RJN2
Fort-Worth, Dallas(TX) CAMS 75 & TCEQ monitoring site
Eagle Mountain Lake ti bi t it i
Laboratory trailer continuous ambient monitoring station (CAMS 75) operated by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
in this study
Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
Instrumentation available at CAMS 75 & TCEQ monitoring site
Species/parameter Measurement technique
NH3 Daylight Solutions External Cavity Quantum Cascade Laser (Photo-acoustic Spectroscopy)
CO Thermo Electron Corp. 48C Trace Level CO Analyzer (Gas Filter Correlation)
SO2 Thermo Electron Corp. 43C Trace Level SO2 Analyzer (Pulsed Fluorescence)
NO Thermo Electron Corp 42C Trace Le el NO NO NO Anal er (Chemil minescence)NOx Thermo Electron Corp. 42C Trace Level NO-NO2-NOX Analyzer (Chemiluminescence)
NOy Thermo Electron Corp. 42C-Y NOY Analyzer (Molybdenum Converter)
HNO3 Mist Chamber coupled to Ion Chromatography (Dionex, Model CD20-1)
HCl Mist Chamber coupled to Ion Chromatography (Dionex, Model CD20-1)
VOCs IONICON Analytik Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometer and TCEQ Automated Gas ChromatographChromatograph
PBL height Vaisala Ceilometer CL31 with updated firmware to work with Vaisala Boundary Layer View software
Temperature Campbell Scientific HMP45C Platinum Resistance Thermometer
Wind speed Campbell Scientific 05103 R. M. Young Wind Monitor
Wind direction Campbell Scientific 05103 R. M. Young Wind Monitor
NH3 source attribution & temperature variationsE i i t f ifi d• Emission events from specified point sources (i.e., industrial facilities)
ppb) 8
10
12
• Estimated NH3 emissions from cows (1.3 tons/day)
• Estimated NH3 emissions from NH
3 mix
ing
ratio
(p
2
4
6
st ated 3 e ss o s osoil and vegetation (0.15 tons/day)
• EPA PMF (biogenic: 74 1%;40
N
0
• EPA PMF (biogenic: 74.1%; light duty vehicles: 12.1%; natural gas/industry: 9.4%; and heavy duty vehicles: 4 4%) ra
ture
(o C)
30
35
heavy duty vehicles: 4.4%)• Livestock might account for
approximately 66.4% of total NH i i
Tem
pe
25
photo: Public Domain / RJN2 NH3 emissions• Increased contribution from
industry ( 18.9%)Hour of day (CST)
30 May 2011 - 30 June 2011
0 5 10 15 2020
From Conventional PAS to QEPASQ>>1000
Laser beam, power P
Q>>1000
Cell is OPTIONAL!
V-effective volume
Absorption αModulated
SWAP RESONATING ELEMENT!!!
(P or λ) at for f/2
PiezoelectricVfPQS α~
Piezoelectric crystalResonant at f⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡ ×∆
α=
HzWcm-1
min
fPNNEA
quality factor Q⎦⎣∆ Hzf
Quartz Tuning Fork as a Resonant Microphone for QEPAS
Unique propertiesUnique properties• Extremely low internal losses:
Q~10 000 at 1 atmQ~100 000 in vacuumQ
• Acoustic quadrupole geometryLow sensitivity to external sound
• Large dynamic range (~106) – linear from h l i b kd d f ithermal noise to breakdown deformation
300K noise: x~10-11 cmBreakdown: x~10-2 cm
• Wide temperature range: from 1 6K to 700K• Wide temperature range: from 1.6K to ~700KAcoustic Micro-resonator (mR) tubes
• Optimum inner diameter:0.6 mm; mR-QTF i 25 50gap is 25-50 µm
• Optimum mR tubes must be ~ 4.4 mm long (~λ/4<l<λ/2 for sound at 32.8 kHz)
• SNR of QTF with mR tubes: ×30 (depending on gas composition and pressure)
Optimum NH3 Line Selection for a 10.34 µm CW TEC DFB QCL
9
%] 10 ppb NH3
5% CO2
Pressure = 130 Torr300
a.u.
] 2.5 ppm NH3 in N2
5% CO2, 1% H2O and residual NH3
6965.35 cm-1
n x
10-3 [% 5% H2O
967.35 cm-1
100
200 967.71 cm-1
CO2 line
Sig
nal [
a
3
Abs
orpt
ion
-200
-100
0
QE
PA
S
967.35 cm-1
964 965 966 967 9680A
Wavenumber [cm-1]1240 1220 1200 1180 1160 1140 1120
200
Current [mA]
P= 130 Torr NH3 line
Simulated HITRAN high resolution spectra @ 130 Torr indicating two NH3 absorption li f i t t
No overlap between NH3 and CO2 absorptionlines was observed for the selected 967.35 cm-1
NH b ti li i th R b dlines of interest NH3 absorption line in the ν2 R band.
QEPAS based NH3 Gas Sensor Architecture
Gas out Gas in
Pressure sensor port
Gas out Gas in
Pressure sensor port
Quartz TF withMicroresonatorTwo glass tubesOptical windows,
Ø10 mm
Quartz TF withMicroresonatorTwo glass tubesOptical windows,
Ø10 mm
Electrical feedthroughElectrical feedthrough
CW TEC DFB QCL in HHL package (Hamamatsu)
Real-time exhaled human NH3 Breath Measurements400
Pressure
250
300
350
n [p
pb]
Breath data from NH3 Rice sensor
Max NH3 concentration is: 351 ppb
8
10
12
150
200
250
atio
n [%
]e
[mba
r]
Pressure CO2
NH3
on [p
pb]
100
150
200
conc
entra
tio
2
4
6
50
100
150
O2 c
once
ntra
way
Pre
ssur
e
3 con
cnet
ratio
14:24:00 14:24:20 14:24:40 14:25:00 14:25:200
50NH
3
Time [HH:MM:SS]0 1000 2000 3000 4000
0
2
0
50
CO
Airw
Point [-]
NH
3
Successful testing of a 2nd generation breath
Time [HH:MM:SS]Airway pressure (black), CO2 (red), and NH3 (blue) profiles of a single breath exhalation lasting 40sec.
Successful testing of a 2nd generation breath ammonia monitor installed in a clinical environment.(Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD and St. Luke’s Hospital, Bethlehem, PA)
Minimum detectable concentration of NH3 is:~ 6 ppbv at 967.35 cm-1 (1σ; 1 s time resolution)
Motivation for Nitric Oxide Detection• Atmospheric Chemistry• Atmospheric Chemistry• Environmental pollutant gas monitoring
NO monitoring from automobile exhaust andNOX monitoring from automobile exhaust and power plant emissions Precursor of smog and acid rain
• Industrial process controlFormation of oxynitride gates in CMOS Devices
• NO in medicine and biologyImportant signaling molecule in physiological
i h d l (1998 N b lprocesses in humans and mammals (1998 Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine) Treatment of asthma, COPD, acute lung rejection, , g j
• Photofragmentation of nitro-based explosives
Molecular Absorption Spectra within two Mid-IR Atmospheric Windows and NO absorption @ 5.26µm
CO2: 4.2 µm
COS: 4.86 µm0.16
1ppm NO at 250 Torr, L=1 m
CO: 4.66 µm CH2O: 3.6 µm
CH4: 3.3 µm
COS: 4.86 µm
0.10
0.12
0.14
on [%
]
NO: 5.26 µm
3.1 µm5.5 µm 0.04
0.06
0.08
Abs
orpt
ioNH3: 10.6 µm O3: 10 µm
N20, CH4: 7.66 µm
1800 1850 1900 19500.00
0.02
Wavenumber [cm-1]Wavenumber [cm ]
12.5 µm 7.6 µm
Source: HITRAN 2000 database
Performance of a 5.26 µm CW HHL TEC DFB-QCL
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_603mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_618mA
MAXION 5 26 DFB QCL 20 5d 633 AMAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_633mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_648mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_663mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_678mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_693mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_708mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_723mA 708090
100110
ADM
(mW
)
T=19 °C T=20.5 °C
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_738mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_753mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_768mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_783mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_798mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_813mA 2030405060
pow
er a
fter A T=22 °C
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_828mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_843mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_858mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_873mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_888mA
MAXION _5.26 um DFB_QCL 20.5deg_893mA
189919001901190219031904
0 600 650 700 750 800 850 9000
10
Opt
ical
Current (mA)
Single frequency QCL radiation recorded with FTIR for different laser current values at a QCL temperature of 20.5oC.
CW DFB-QCL optical power and current tuningat three different temperatures.
1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904
Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Emission spectra of a 1900cm-1 TEC CW DFB QCL and HITRAN Simulated spectra p
20
20
16
20
%]
16
20
%]
8
12
orpt
ion
[%
8
12
orpt
ion
[%4
8
Abso
4
8
Abso
1895 1900 19050
Wavenumber [cm-1]P=1 atm, L=1m1895 1900 1905
0
Wavenumber [cm-1]P=1 atm, L=1m 100 ppm of NO 5% of H2O 5% of CO2 100 ppm of NO 5% of H2O 5% of CO2
Output power: 117 mW @ 25 C
CW TEC DFB QCL based QEPAS NO Gas Sensor
Schematic of a DFB-QCL based Gas Sensor.QPcL – plano-convex lens, Ph – pinhole, QTF – quartz tuning fork, mR – microresonator, RC- reference cell, P-elec D – pyro electric detector
Performance of CW DFB-QCL based WMS QEPAS NO Sensor Platform
0.1% NO at P=200 Torr, 5 cm ref. cell
100
]
95 ppb NO reference cylinderNO
6
8
10
nal [
a.u.
] 1ppm NO + 2.4% H2O, P= 240 Torr
100
200
nal [
a.u.
]
60
80
atio
n [p
pb] NO
0
2
4
AS 2
f sig
n
0
100
AS 3
f sig
n
20
40
O c
once
ntra
N2N2
900 890 880 870 860 850
-4
-2
QE
PA
Laser current [mA]
-100 QE
PA
13:37 13:40 13:43 13:46 13:49
0
NO
Time [HH:MM]
2f QEPAS signal amplitude for 95 ppb NO when DFB-QCL was locked to the 1900.08 cm-1 line.
Laser current [mA]
2f QEPAS signal (navy) and reference 3f signal (red) when DFB-QCL was tuned across 1900.08 cm-1 NO line.
[ ]
Minimum detectable NO concentration is: ~ 3 ppbv (1σ; 1 s time resolution)
Motivation for Carbon Monoxide Detection• Atmospheric Chemistry• Atmospheric Chemistry
Incomplete combustion of natural gas, fossil fuel and other carbon containing fuels.gImpact on atmospheric chemistry through its reaction with hydroxyl (OH) for troposphere ozone formation and changing the level of greenhouseformation and changing the level of greenhouse gases (e.g. CH4).
• Public HealthExtremely dangerous to human life even at a low concentrations. Therefore CO must be carefully monitored at low concentration levelsmonitored at low concentration levels.
• CO in medicine and biologyHypertension, neurodegenerations, heart failure andHypertension, neurodegenerations, heart failure and inflammation have been linked to abnormality in CO metabolism and function.
Performance of a NWU 4.61 µm high power CW TEC DFB QCL
12 T 10 oC
9
10
11
12 λ~4.6 µm DFB QCLcw operation
r(mW
)
V)
6007008009001000
2169.02169.62170.22170.82171.4
R6 CO linecm-1)
T=10 oC T=12.5 oC T=15 oC T=18 oC
6
7
8
T=12 5 oC Opt
ical
pow
er
Vol
tage
(V
200300400500600
T=10 oC
2166.62167.22167.82168.4
R6 CO line
Wav
enum
ber(
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
4
5
T=18 oC
T=12.5 CT=15 oC
O
Current (mA)
0100
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 13002164.82165.42166.0W
Current (mA)
R5 CO line
CW DFB-QCL optical power and current tuning at a four different QCL temperatures.
1.5x10-5
n 200 ppb CO 2% H2O
x10-5
0.4 300 ppb N2O
0 30.60.91.2 R8R7
Abso
rptio R6R5
0.1
0.2
0.3
bsor
ptio
n Estimated max wall-plug efficiency (WPE) is ~ 7% at 1.25A QCL drive-current.
2166 2168 2170 2172 2174 21760.00.3A
Wavenumber (cm-1)
0.0
0.1
A drive current.
CW DFB-QCL based CO QEPAS Sensor Resultsx104
800900 P=760 Torr
b)
From cigarette
015304560 Modulation depth=50 mA
P=760 Torr
igna
l (C
nts)
with 2.6% H2O dry gas
500600700800
atio
n (p
pb
-30-15
-4500
450900
QEP
AS
Si
(a)
Pure Nitrogen
(b)
200300400500
once
ntra
2f QEPAS signal for dry (red) and moisturized (blue)5 ppm CO:N2 mixture near 2169.2 cm-1.
2169.1 2169.2 2169.3Wavenumber (cm-1)
x104
10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:000
100200
CO
co
30
40
1.52.0
50 ppb
x104
nal (
Cnt
s)
x10
P=760 TorrModulation depth=40 mA
nal (
Cnt
s)
5000 ppb
Gas with 2.6% H2O
Time (HH:MM)
Minimum detectable CO concentration is:10
20
17:00 17:05 17:10 17:150.00.51.0
N2
50 ppb
QEP
AS
Sign
Time (HH:MM)
100 b250 ppb
500 ppb
1000 ppb
2500 ppb
QE
PA
S S
ign
Atmospheric CO concentration levels on Rice University campus, Houston, TX
Dilution of a 5 ppm CO reference gas mixture whenthe CW DFB-QCL is locked to the 2169.2 cm-1 R6 CO line.
Minimum detectable CO concentration is: ~ 2 ppbv (1σ; 1 s time resolution)17:00 17:20 17:40 18:00 18:20
0 N2N250 ppb 100 ppbQ
Time (HH:MM)
CW DFB-QCL based SO2 QEPAS Results M i i f S lf Di id D iMotivation for Sulfur Dioxide Detection• Prominent air pollutant• Emitted from coal fired power plants (~73%)and other industrial facilities (~20%)
• In atmosphere SO2 converts to sulfuric acidprimary contributors to acid rain
• SO2 reacts to form sulfate aerosols• Primary SO2 exposure for 1 hour is 75 ppb
SO ff l d b hi• SO2 exposure affects lungs and causes breathingdifficulties•Currently, reported annual average atmospheric SO2concentrations range from ~ 1 - 6 ppb
7.24 µm CW DFB-QCL optical power and current tuning at three different operating temperatures.
2f WMS QEPAS signals for different SO2 concentrations when laser was tuned across 1380.9 cm-1 line.
Minimum detectable SO2 concentration is: ~ 100 ppbv (1σ; 1 s time resolution)Molecular Absorption Spectra within two Mid-IR Atmospheric Windows
QCL based QEPAS Performance for10 Trace Gas Species (May 2013)p ( y )
Molecule (carrier gas)
Frequency cm-1
Pressure Torr
NNEA cm-1W/Hz½
QCL Power mW
NEC (τ=1s)ppbV
CH2O (N2:75% RH)* 2804.90 75 8.7×10-9 7.2 120
CO (N2+ 2 2% H2O)* 2176 28 100 1 57×10-8 71 2CO (N2+ 2.2% H2O) 2176.28 100 1.57×10 71 2
CO (propylene) 2196.66 50 7.4×10-8 6.5 140
N2O (air+5%SF6) 2195.63 50 1.5×10-8 19 7
N2O (N2+2.37%H2O) 2201.75 200 2.9×10-8 70 2.5
C2H5OH (N2)** 1934.2 770 2.2×10-7 10 9x104
NO (N2+H2O) 1900.07 250 7.5×10-9 100 3.6
SO2 (N2+2.4%H2O) 1380.94 100 2.0×10-8 40 100 8N2O (air) 1275.49 230 5.3×10-8 100 30
CH4 (air) 1275.39 230 1.7×10-7 100 118
C2HF5 (N2)*** 1208.62 770 7.8×10-9 6.6 9
NH3 (N2)* 1046.39 110 1.6×10-8 20 6
* - Improved microresonator ** - Improved microresonator and double optical pass through ADM *** - With amplitude modulation and metal microresonator
3 ( )
SF6*** 943.73 75 2.7×10-10 40 5×10-2
p
NNEA – normalized noise equivalent absorption coefficient. NEC – noise equivalent concentration for available laser power and τ=1s time constant, 18 dB/oct filter slope.
For comparison: conventional PAS 2.2 (2.6)×10-9 cm-1W/√Hz (1,800; 10,300 Hz) for NH3*, (**)
* M. E. Webber et al, Appl. Opt. 42, 2119-2126 (2003); ** J. S. Pilgrim et al, SAE Intl. ICES 2007-01-3152; *** - V. Spagnolo, et al. University and Politecnico of Bari, Italy
Merits of QEPAS based Trace Gas Detection• Very small sensing module and sample volume (a few mm3 to ~2cm2)y g p ( )• Extremely low dissipative losses• Optical detector is not required• Wide dynamic range• Wide dynamic range• Frequency and spatial selectivity of acoustic signals• Rugged transducer – quartz monocrystal; can operate in a wide range of
d t tpressures and temperatures• Immune to environmental acoustic noise, sensitivity is limited by the
fundamental thermal TF noise: kBT energy in the TF symmetric modeAb f l f i SNR l √ t 3 h• Absence of low-frequency noise: SNR scales as √t, up to t=3 hours as experimentally verified
QEPAS: some challenges C t f S t h bl• Cost of Spectrophone assembly
• Sensitivity scales with laser power• Effect of H2O• Responsivity depends on the speed of sound and molecular energy
transfer processes• Cross sensitivity issues
Potential Integration of a CW DFB- QCL and QEPAS Absorption Detection Module
2012 QEPAS ADM HHL package fiber coupled DFB-QCL
A. Lyakh, et al “1.6 W high wall plug efficiency, continuous-wave room temperature quantum cascade laser emitting at 4.6 µm”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 111110 (2008)
QCL-fiber beam profile and losses
HWGHWG FiberFiber withwithHWG HWG FiberFiber with with 300 µm bore 300 µm bore sizesize
allowsallows single mode single mode beam delivery @ beam delivery @
10,5 µm10,5 µm
λλ 10 510 5 Bore Size 300 µm
Straight L
1 dB/m
λλ = 8,7 µm= 8,7 µmλλ = 10,5 µm= 10,5 µm
LossesBending Losses
0,1 dB/m
λλ = 10,5 µm= 10,5 µmλλ 10,5 µm 10,5 µm
Future Directions and Outlook
• New target analytes such as carbonyl sulfide (OCS), formaldehyde (CH2O), nitrous acid (HNO ) h d id (H O ) th l(HNO2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ethylene (C2H4), ozone (O3), nitrate (NO3), propane (C H ) and benzene (C H )(C3H8), and benzene (C6H6)
• Ultra-compact, low cost, robust sensors (e.g. C2H6, NO, CO……)C2H6, NO, CO……)
• Monitoring of broadband absorbers: acetone (C3H6O), acetone peroxide (TATP) , UF6……( 3 6 ), p ( ) , 6
• Optical power build-up cavity designs• Development of trace gas sensor networksDevelopment of trace gas sensor networks
Mid- IR and THz Ring Cavity Surface Emitting QCLs
(a) Two-dimensional far-field plot emanating from a MIR RCSE QCL and recorded with afrom a MIR RCSE-QCL and recorded with a micro-bolometer camera in a distance of 40 mm. (b) Polarization dependent intensity measurement.
(a) Three-dimensional illustration of a ring cavity surface emitting laser. (b) Scanning electron microscopy image of a processed MIRelectron microscopy image of a processed MIR device. Close-up of a (c) MIR and (d) a THz waveguide section holding second order gratings.
Summary
• Laser spectroscopy with a mid-infrared, room temperature, continuous wave, DFB laser diodes and high performance DFB QCL is a promising analytical approach for real time atmospheric measurements and breath analysis.
• Six infrared semiconductor lasers from Nanoplus, Daylight Solutions, MaxionTechnologies (PSI), Hamamatsu, Northwestern University and AdtechOptics were used recently (2011-2012) by means of TDLAS, PAS and QEPAS
• Seven target trace gas species were detected with a 1 sec sampling time:C2H6 at ~ 3.36 µm with a detection sensitivity of 130 pptv using TDLAS2 6 µ y pp gNH3 at ~ 10.4 µm with a detection sensitivity of ~1 ppbv (200 sec averaging time);NO at ~5.26µm with a detection limit of 3 ppbvCO at ~ 4.61µm with minimum detection limit of 2 ppbvSO2 at ~7.24µm with a detection limit of 100 ppbvSO2 at 7.24µm with a detection limit of 100 ppbvCH4 and N2O at ~7.28 µm currently in progress with detection limits of 20 and 7 ppbv, respectively.
• New target analytes such as OCS, CH2O, HONO, H2O2, C2H4, • Monitoring of broadband absorbers such as acetone C3H8 C6H6 and UF6Monitoring of broadband absorbers such as acetone, C3H8, C6H6 and UF6• Compact, robust sensitive and selective single frequency, mid-infrared sensor
technology that is capable of performing precise, accurate and autonomous concentration measurements of trace gases relevant in environmental, biomedical, industrial monitoring and national security.