microbial biodegradation potential of hydrocarbons ...€¦ · microbial biodegradation potential...
TRANSCRIPT
Microbial biodegradation potential of hydrocarbons evaluated by
colorimetric technique: a case study
E. D. Bidoia, R. N. Montagnolli and P. R. M. Lopes
Departamento de Bioquímica e Microbiologia, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista, Av. 24A, 1515,
13506-900 Rio Claro-SP, Brazil
The increasing industrial development promotes serious environmental damage due to pollution of the environment.
Regarding the petrochemical industry, contamination by oil and its derivatives causes the degradation of terrestrial and
aquatic ecosystems. Thus, control and treatment strategies to combat the hazardous effects of oil pollution are needed.
However, conventional physical-chemical treatments have high costs and can generate residues that are toxic to the biota.
Allying high efficiency and low cost, bioremediation processes represent an extremely important way of recovering
contaminated areas among several other cleaning-up techniques. These strategies involve microorganisms and their
metabolism in biodegrading organic compounds. Also, the use of nutrients, aeration, pH and temperature adjustments or
the addition of substances could make the biodegradation process easier. In order to accomplish this, screening and
evaluation methods adapted to a potentially biodegrading microbiota in different types of contaminants have been
established. Viable methods in biodegradation data generation during biotechnological process application are
fundamental in the elaboration of original references about the biodegradability of certain substances. There are many
techniques capable of precisely evaluating biodegradation processes, including colorimetric methods. The isolation,
characterization and profile of specific bacteria in petrol derived oil biodegradation capacity studies are important when
deciding the correct bioremediation strategy. Different microorganism species have different biodegradation capabilities.
Due to this fact, the elaboration of different types of oil biodegradation profiles by different bacteria is an important task
for selecting microorganisms in bioremediation processes. In order to accomplish this, screening and evaluation methods
adapted to potentially biodegrading bacteria have been established. One of these methods adapted to biodegradation
evaluation is colorimetry, which is a technique used to evaluate the biodegradation of some substances. DCPIP based
colorimetric technique provides enough data on hydrocarbons used as metabolic substrates by microorganisms. The
concentration detection is possible due to the absorbance determination in a specified light specter. The 2,6-dichlorophenol
indophenol (DCPIP, redox potential +0.217 V) indicator is widely used in colorimetric processes. Its property is the color
change from blue to transparent when subjected to chemical reduction. The indicator, when oxidized is blue and when
reduced is transparent. The color change occurs due to a structural change in the molecule, in which the double bond
between nitrogen and carbon passes to a simple bond. This insaturation changes the entire molecule, resulting in a
macroscopic change in the overall color of the biodegraded substance. The DCPIP indicator is applied in a series of
electron transfer reactions, including biodegradable substances. Colorimetric methodology applied to oil biodegradation
promotes a better handling of different oil microbial biodegrading profiles. Moreover, such rapid and simple colorimetric
methodology provides resources on the development of new techniques in effluent treatments, not only during petrol
derived oils, but also on other contaminated organic polymeric compounds.
Keywords oil pollution; bioremediation; microbial metabolism; colorimetry; 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol
1. Remediation of impacted environments
1.1 Oil pollution
Petroleum products are extensively widespread all over the world and their intensive use is strongly connected to the
anthropogeneous discharge of hydrocarbons into the environment [1]. Environmental contamination by petrol
derivatives has been a subject of study over the past four decades. The leakage of these derivative oils, such as lubricant
oils, is capable of harming the environment in many ways [2].
A major concern for petroleum hydrocarbon bioremediation is the presence of heavy compounds such as polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), asphaltenes and many branched compounds with 20 or more carbon atoms. These
heavy hydrocarbon constituents are not easily metabolized by microorganisms and are considered potential health risks
due to their possible carcinogenic and mutagenic actions [3].
Furthermore, 1% of all oil consumption is used to produce lubricants [4] and all procedures in lubricant oil
production and transport can generate environmental impacts [5]. Hamblin [6] emphasized the percentage of used oil
discharged into ecosystems without any treatment as 13% for Europe and 32% for U.S.A. Moreover, lubricant oil can
persist for more than six years in some ecosystems, resulting in chronic problems to the biota [7]. Even under laboratory
conditions, the complete metabolism of oil by microorganisms takes weeks to months [2].
Lubricant discharge in nature causes continuous concern due to its non-quantified impact and its potential chronic
damage [8]. In this context, residual lubricant oil contained in commercial bottles causes significant contamination,
because one ton of this automotive oil corresponds to the waste produced from the domestic sewers of 40,000
_______________________________________________________________________________________
inhabitants per day. Besides this, only 1.0 L of lubricant is able to deplete the oxygen of 1,000,000 L of water, therefore
a city discharge of 200,000 inhabitants is the same as 47 L of residual oil, which affects 47 million L of water [9].
1.2 Remediation processes
Physical and chemical processes are usually used in remediation of contaminated areas. Dispersion, dilution, sorption,
volatilization and abiotic transformations are important means of hydrocarbon elimination. However, this type of
treatment system requires heavy machinery and the environmental consequences of this pollutant removal may result in
massive air pollution [10]. Allying high efficiency and low costs, bioremediation processes represent an extremely
important way of recovering oil contaminated areas among several other cleaning-up techniques [11].
Remediation by physical treatments revealed that, even though the soil is unaffected or unmodified by these
treatments, the costs are high, and thus unviable in a large scale.
In spite of this, biodegradation is most often the primary mechanism for contaminant clean-up [12, 13]. Also, for the
remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated sites, biological technologies are a widely used, cost efficient and sustainable
approach [14].
2. Biological treatment
2.1 Degradation by microorganisms
Bioremediation exploits the ability of some microorganisms to degrade organic contaminants and has been established
as an efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly treatment [13; 15]. This process depends on environment
conditions and the microbial community structure and, in unfavorable conditions, is generally achieved via
bioaugmentation, biostimulation or both [16].
Microbial biotransformation is considered a major environmental technique in treating hydrocarbon pollution in both
terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems [17; 18]. This suggests that the biodegradative contribution of the indigenous
microorganisms is often significant [13; 19].
Therefore, in order to eliminate or minimize the effects of such contaminations, bioremediation shows up as an
effective alternative, which can be used by potentially biodegrading microorganisms [2]. Microorganisms are capable of
performing the mineralization of organic chemicals, transforming substances ultimately into CO2, water and biomass
[20]. This transformation capacity is of main importance in bioremediation processes, which relies on biodegradation.
The activation of natural degradation potentials in environmental media is the challenge for environmental research
that addresses remediation methods. Notwithstanding the widespread application, in situ bioremediation is a site-
specific process and feasibility studies are required before full-scale remediation can be applied successfully [21].
Moreover, degradation rates and in particular residual concentrations derived from preliminary studies in the laboratory
can be used to predict achievable rates and concentrations in the field [22].
Hence, feasibility studies are a prerequisite for any planned strategy in bioremediation contaminated environments in
order to identify limitations towards biodegradation and to predict remediation performance and thereby rule out
technologies that may be inappropriate for the clean-up of the site of concern [23; 24]. Additionally, the environmental
behavior and chemical-physical properties of lubricant oils are the basis for new fluid developments and for ecological
treatment strategies [25].
2.2 Bioremediation of hydrocarbons
Viable methods in biodegradation data generation during biotechnological process application are fundamental in the
elaboration of original references about the biodegradability of certain substances [26]. There are many techniques
capable of precisely evaluating biodegradation processes, including colorimetric methods. The isolation,
characterization and profile of specific bacteria for petrol derived oils biodegradation capacity studies are important
when deciding the correct bioremediation strategy.
According to Torstensson [27] and Aichberger et al. [23], preliminary assessments account for three critical
prerequisites in bioremediation, namely: (i) the availability of chemicals for the biodegrading microorganisms; (ii) the
quantity of these microorganisms; and (iii) their activity level. Other factors are also important in moderating and
driving biodegradation, such as temperature, pH, aeration, organic matter and nutrients.
Due to hydrocarbons being widespread pollutants, their hydrophobicity causes a low bioavailability and therefore a
particular persistence against bioremediation measures [28; 29]. However, numerous terrestrial and aquatic species of
microorganisms possess the ability to degrade these hydrocarbons. In order to increase the bioavailability of these
otherwise hardly accessible substrates, microorganisms use strategies like increasing the hydrophobicity of their
surfaces or the production of biosurfactants [30].
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Long chain hydrocarbons, specifically cyclic alkanes present in petrol derived oils, are difficult for bacteria to
degrade [31]. In order to efficiently promote biodegradation, many hydrocarbon degrading bacteria were investigated
after isolation in an oil polluted environment [32-35].
Referring to automotive lubricants, biodegradation studies demonstrated that used oil showed considerable
assimilation by microbial metabolism when compared to new fluids such as mineral, semi-synthetic and synthetic ones.
Automotive lubricant processing in engines modifies its physical-chemical properties due to high pressure and
temperature that promote breaks in the hydrocarbon chains. Thus, shorter carbon molecules facilitate microorganism
degradation [36; 37].
Lopes et al. [38] studied the toxicity of different lubricant oils (mineral, semi-synthetic and used) before and after
biodegradation using Eruca sativa seeds (arugula) and Eisenia foetida (earthworm) as test-organisms. It was observed
that although used oil was the most biodegradable, it was more toxic than new lubricants. Also, as biodegradation
proceeded the toxic potential was reduced, but a substantial toxicity remained as hydrocarbons persisted in the soil [39].
Thus, the used lubricant oil hazards are harder to quantify because of its complex composition. Many compounds
contribute to high toxicity, but the PAHs formed in service transform used oil into a potential carcinogen. PAHs derive
from fuel combustion and lubricant decomposition, therefore their concentration increases in used oils [40].
2.3 Biostimulation
Microbial efficiency in degrading organic compounds is a function of the ability of the microbial degraders to remain
active in the natural environment. Hence, increasing the ability of the inoculated microorganisms by bioaugmentation or
promoting the activity of indigenous microbial degraders by biostimulation could improve bioremediation [12].
It has been reported that the addition of nutrients has a beneficiary effect on hydrocarbon degradation in the soil by
enhancing microbial activity in organic compounds metabolization [39; 41-43]. According to this, a
carbon:nitrogen:phosphorous (C:N:P) ratio of 100:10:1 is commonly proposed [44; 45].
2.4 Bioaugmentation
Individual isolates have lower ability than microbial consortia in biodegradation, especially for complex mixtures of
compounds such as diesel oil and crude oil [43].
Vecchiolli et al. [46] demonstrated that in addition to the natural presence of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria in soils,
exogenous microbial inoculation is able to accelerate the biodegradation whenever conditions are appropriate. They
conclude that biodegradation of polluted soils with petroleum hydrocarbons such as accidental spills may be enhanced
by indigenous bacteria inoculation. In the same way, Goldstein et al. [47] observed that when species capable of
destroying organic compounds are added to the natural environment there is an enhanced biodegradation of these
substances. The addition of microorganisms in polluted environments is a technique called bioaugmentation.
Bioaugmentation provides specific microbes in sufficient number to complete the biodegradation process. Over the
last few years, contaminating compounds such as insecticides, petroleum compounds and a growing number of toxic
organic chemicals have been successfully remediated using bioaugmentation [48-50].
Several advantages are present in bioaugmentation when compared to other techniques: the specific inoculum
addition starts the degradation process immediately whereas, in biostimulation, after the nutrients are injected there is a
delay in beginning the major biodegradation process [51].
It must be noted that in nature biodegradation capacity is not due to a single microorganism within oils. Metabolic
processes in hydrocarbon breaks occur with a succession of species within a microbial consortium. Even non-petrol
degrading microorganisms may play an important role in environment oil removal, as the degradation of petroleum
leads to a progressive chain of reactions, which leads to intermediate compounds handled by other types of
microorganisms [52].
Moreover, different microorganism species have different biodegradation capabilities. Due to this fact, the
elaboration of different types of oil biodegradation profiles by different bacteria is an important task for selecting
microorganisms in bioremediation processes. In order to accomplish this, screening and evaluation methods adapted to
potentially biodegrading bacteria have been established.
3. Redox indicator 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol
3.1 Redox reactions
Alternative means of determining when reducing conditions exist are provided from redox indicators. Generally, it is
observed that oxidized forms are colored and reduced forms are colorless. Due to this fact, color changes can be
monitored with a spectrophotometer, evaluating changes in redox indicator absorbance value.
The redox half reaction of a redox indicator is described by Equation 1 below. As the oxidized indicator reacts with a
reductant, the absorbance decreases and the reducing power of the sample can be estimated.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
(1)
where:
Indox is the oxidized form of the indicator, Indred is the reduced form, ne- is the number of electrons transferred, and m
is the number of protons transferred - pH dependant [53].
Also, many redox indicators are reversible and couple to a Pt electrode [54]. The redox potential for an indicator
(Eind) is determined by the relative concentrations of both oxidized and reduced species and the Nernst Equation 2
below.
(2)
where:
Eo’ind,pH is the formal potential of the indicator at the specified pH.
The potential can vary between various indicators and is often a complex function of pH, since many different
indicators have groups (i.e. amines) that can be protonated or deprotonated.
3.2 Redox within microorganisms
Metabolic pathways within microbial cells are concisely regulated and extremely sensitive to the cell’s need. As a rule,
redox reactions and specific redox couples, that cycle between oxidized and reduced states, occur in all of the major
metabolic pathways in cells. The concentrations of the redox couples help to regulate the flow of metabolites through
these pathways. These intracellular concentrations of redox couples might, likewise, be responsive to receptor agonists,
as well as cell nutrients [55]. According to this fact, by using chemical analysis, such concentration changes can be
evaluated.
As an example from Rabinowitz et al. [56], some biochemical techniques are used substantially for the direct
quantization of NAD+/NADH, NADP+/NADPH, cystine/cysteine, and oxidized/reduced glutathione (γ-
glutamylcysteinylglycine, GSSG/GSH), thus, developing probes of cellular redox reactions permit the screening of
chemical libraries for compounds affecting redox metabolism. Moreover, for any one redox pair, different potentials
may be maintained in different subcellular compartments [57].
3.3 Redox indicator DCPIP as an electron acceptor
Hydrocarbon oxidation processes by microorganisms involve redox reactions, in which electrons are transferred to
electron acceptors, such as O2 nitrates and sulfate [58], as seen in Fig. 1. The microbial sulfate-reducing redox is one of
the most reducing redox environmental systems. In terms of formal reduction potentials, sulfate reduction to sulfide
occurs at about 220mV at pH 7 [59]. A low redox level is achieved in an environment where conditions are completely
anaerobic and the terminal electron acceptors (TA) such as NO3, Mn(IV) and Fe(III) have been fully depleted [60].
Sulfate-reducers use sulfate as the TA and commonly lactate, acetate, or H2 as the electron donor in the process of
creating ATP, and producing sulfide [59].
Fig. 1 DCPIP redox scheme, for the catalytic oxidation of sulphide
(adapted from Florou [61]).
Common means of measuring sulfate include ion chromatography with a conductivity detector and gravimetric or
turbidimetric methods based on Ba(II) as a precipitating agent [62]. Redox environments, including the sulfate-reducing
and/or nitrate-reducing conditions in environmental systems, are usually determined by monitoring decreases or
increases in sulfate concentration. This way, as seen in Fig. 1, microbial metabolism can also be commonly measured
with some colorimetric methods including methylene blue method, iodometric titrimetry or the 2,6-dichlorophenol-
indophenol indicator (referred as from this point as DCPIP).
Colorimetric methods are referred to as a low cost and rapid procedure in detecting microbial metabolism
occurrence, both in aerobic or anaerobic instances. These methods represent a rapid catalytic microbial based method in
which the natural co-substrate (which can be oxygen, sulfates or nitrates) is substituted by a synthetic mediator [63].
Colorimetry is characterized by high levels of microorganisms and mediators, facilitating the fast reaction. Mediators
_______________________________________________________________________________________
basically act as chemical electron carriers that are able to pass through the cell walls of microorganisms, movingbetween intracellular and extracellular spaces. Once inside the microbial cell, an interaction between mediators andtheir bioelectrochemical counterparts, such as NAD, NADP, flavoproteins, iron–sulfur proteins, quinones andcytochrome, happens by their interaction with the metabolic process and current redox reactions [64]. Microbial cellscatalyze mediator reduction with certain ease when in a very favorable environment. The reduction activity is asensitive indicator directly coupled to respiration via the electron transport chain, and thus reflects the metabolic statusof the cell [65]. DCPIP indicator is included in this category of lypofilic mediator and electron acceptor, capable ofprobing microbial metabolism.
Thus, by incorporating an electron acceptor such as DCPIP, it is possible to ascertain the ability of a microorganismto utilize a hydrocarbon substrate by simply observing the color change, in this case, from blue (oxidized) to colorless(reduced) according to Fig. 2.
Fig. 2 DCPIP reduction reaction.
This technique is aimed at the need to reach a selection of sensitive biocatalysts and mediators capable of detectingthe metabolic perturbations caused by various substrates, including toxic ones [66] or biodegrading processes. It is wellknown that mediators fundamentally work by interacting with the metabolic pathways of the microbial cell. Eventhough the facts regarding interaction of microbial metabolic pathways with electron transfer mediators is quite animportant study, with some important practical usage, few publications are devoted to finding the solution to such animportant question as the search for the interaction mechanism between microbial and mediator, and also the origin ofthe electrons. Thus, more studies are necessary in order to elucidate completely this subject. According to Heiskanen etal. [67], once the interaction mechanism between microbial and mediator is made clear, the mediator will assume thefunction of an electrochemical probe, as the functionalized mediators would be useful for a better comprehension of theeffects of physiochemical reactions occurring within microorganisms in the redox state.
3.4 DCPIP characteristics
DCPIP is an enzyme-catalyzed oxidation electron acceptor that is blue in its oxidized form and colorless in its reducedform [68]. Its loss of color is monitored at a wavelength of 600 nm. A peak in the absorbance is observed at 600 nm, asreported by Yoshida et al. [69]. Some studies affirm that DCPIP is unstable in darkness or when exposed to light for along time [70]. Moreover, the color of the DCPIP indicator in the presence of light is reasonably stable and can be usedreliably for some time, especially when adding NAHCO3 to the dye solution [71].
Additionally, higher concentrations make the color become too dark and the color change induced by reduction withredox reactions is not easily apparent [72]. On the other hand, at lower DCPIP concentrations, the reagent amount isinsufficient to signal any perceptible decreases. So, 1g L-1 is the concentration usually selected in many studies [73-75].
A pH value of 7.25 is chosen as satisfactory working stability with DCPIP, since the redox mediator is notsufficiently stable for higher pH values. Moreover, DCPIP’s reactivity is reduced because of its exposure to a veryalkaline medium (0.07 M KOH, pH 12). Regarding the temperature effects, the response of the indicator is alsoestablished to a maximum response ranging from 297 to 303 K [76]. A calibration curve for DCPIP was obtained from0.2 to 140 μM with the same spectrophotometer and showed an excellent correlation coefficient (r=0.9997) according toNakamura et al. [73]. In an earlier report, Yari et al. [71] obtained a similar curve and similar correlation coefficient.
DCPIP is a pH dependant redox indicator, and not only does it change from blue to colorless, it can also turn into ared color at low pH systems, and also in the presence of some other cations e.g. Al3+, Fe3+, Pb2+ and Cu2+, which changethe pH of the system and act as Lewis’s [53]. Therefore, DCPIP can act as an acid-base indicator, which is reddish atpH< 5.7. Furthermore, at pH >5.7 in alkali and neutral aqueous solutions its color is blue, acting as the electrochemicalresponse of DCPIP [77]. Below a particular potential, it is capable of accepting two electrons from its environment,becoming reduced and giving up its color [71].
4. DCPIP Applications
4.1 Discovery and original utilization
The DCPIP redox reaction was originally used and discovered by Vernon and Zaugg in 1960 [78]. They found out thatthe DCPIP, when ascorbate was present, formed an efficient electron donor couple for photosystem 1. Studies involving
Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.)
©FORMATEX 2010 1281
_______________________________________________________________________________________
individual photoreactions in plant chloroplasts were improved by proper assay systems available and specific
photosystems operating in normal photosynthesis. DCPIP brought more details to the knowledge regarding the
mechanism of NADP photoreduction by photosystem 1.
Subsequent studies by Yamashita et al. [79] and Nakamoto et al. [80] showed that following the procedure of
washing chloroplasts with 0.8 M tris buffer at pH 8.0 prevented any ability of chloroplasts to produce oxygen, however
in the presence of DCPIP, along with an excess of ascorbate, photophosphorylation of the non-cyclic type could be
restored, which indicated that electrons were entering into the system at the level of photosystem 2. Vernon and Shawl
[81] presented some other studies using DCPIP and produced some great achievements in botany regarding oxygen
evolution activity within chloroplasts.
4.2 DCPIP related studies
The redox indicator capabilities from DCPIP chemical compound were reported in a series of various studies. In their
study regarding the use of Gluconobacter oxydans bacteria cells as a biocatalyst at an anode of a biofuel cell with air-
based cathode, Alferov et al. [82], used the anode and cathode of the cell made of graphite; DCPIP as an electron
transport mediator; and glucose as the substrate to be oxidized. Other uses for DCPIP are: the measurement of
mitochondria complex activities, which determined the activity of succinate–ubiquinone oxidoreductase by the
reduction of DCPIP [83]; as the reactions of thiocholine with DCPIP, which is a simple, reliable and easy method for
automatable measurement of acetylthiocholine during clinical laboratory routines [84]; measurements of the zero
current potential of a platinum electrode immersed in solutions of tannins or in wines of various origins with a solution
of DCPIP, in order to obtain a global indication for the resistance of some wines to oxidation [85]; the application of an
electrochemical sensor, based on a glassy carbon electrode, modified with a cellulose acetate polymeric film bearing
DCPIP, for flow injection analysis of sulfide [76]; the kinetic parameters of both human liver and rat purified
recombinant PDH E1 proteins were determined utilizing DCPIP [86]; a simple screening protocol using DCPIP to
examine the prevalence and the molecular basis of thalassemia in pregnant Lao women [87] and many other original
references ranging from botany to medicine [75; 88-90]. A study informed that altered redox homeostasis in control of
cancer cell survival and proliferative signaling are also a chemical vulnerability that could be targeted by pro-oxidant
redox intervention [91].
5. Biodegradation screening with DCPIP indicator
Pollution by petroleum and its derivates caused by accidental spillage is a concerning problem in the environment. A
well known fact is that there is a group of main microorganisms able to consume petroleum hydrocarbons, which are
bacteria and fungi [92]. Microorganisms are considered degrading agents of a great variety of substances, corroborating
that biological treatment is the most promising alternative for reducing the environmental impact of oil spills [93].
Product composition when released into the environment begins to change immediately because of various
biochemical processes. The characteristics of discharged oil pollutants may be changed by physical, chemical and
biological mechanisms after large periods in altered environmental conditions. Mixed-function oxidase systems present
a great catalytic versatility and are also widely distributed in the environment, taking part in the biotransformation of a
wide variety of both exogenous and endogenous organic compounds [94]. Biodegradation involves a list of
monooxygenation reactions that are catalyzed, including heteroatom oxygenation and dealkylation, aliphatic
hydroxylation, desaturation, oxidative group migration and many other modes of inactivation [95]. Thus, the use of
DCPIP redox indicator presents a rapid, simple and low cost tool for evaluating capability of different microorganisms
to degrade different oils [74; 96].
The biodegradability of petrol derived oils can be verified using the technique based on the DCPIP redox indicator
according to what was discussed up to this point. It is important to remember that the principle of this technique is that,
during the microbial oxidation of the carbon source, electrons are transferred to electron acceptors such as O2, nitrates
and sulfate. Most petroleum-related hydrocarbons are readily degraded via aerobic microorganisms although a number
of studies have shown that in the absence of oxygen alternate electron acceptors such as nitrate, manganese (IV), iron
(III), sulfate and carbon dioxide are used [21; 97-101]. By incorporating an electron acceptor such as DCPIP to the
culture medium, it is possible to ascertain the ability of the microorganism to utilize the substrate by observing the color
change of DCPIP from blue (oxidized) to colorless (reduced) in a screening technology first reported to be applied in oil
biodegradation by Hanson et al. [96]. This technique had also been successfully employed in several studies presented
below.
Enzyme induction DCPIP activity and the study of the mycelium of Aspergillus ochraceus in a kerosene
biodegradation were also evaluated. The subject extract was used as an enzyme source for investigation of the induction
of NADPH-DCPIP reductase, aminopyrine N-demethylase and kerosene degradation activity, therefore evaluating
biodegradation. [102].
A survey of petroleum-degrading bacteria was carried out in India to evaluate distribution of naturally occurring
petroleum-degrading aerobic bacteria. Some genera, such as Pseudomonas, Mycobacterium, Klebsiella, Acinetobacter,
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Micrococcus, and Nocardia were found to be the most common petroleum degraders. Other heterotrophic bacteria
included several species of Escherichia, Klebsiella, non-oil-degrading Pseudomonas, Vibrio, Streptococcus,
Staphylococcus and Bacillus. Following preliminary selection, five strains, showing best growth in medium with oil
fraction as the sole carbon source, were chosen for estimation of the efficiency of crude oil biodegradation using DCPIP
as one of the bioindicators [103]. The use of this method proved to be reliable enough in experiments to quantify
biodegradation kinetics, taking into account the time taken for decolorization of the blue DCPIP to the colorless form.
The strains, which decolorized the DCPIP in the quickest time, were chosen as the best oil degraders [103], but the
absorbance values in 600 nm could also be used to precisely collect data regarding the biodegradation process through
time.
6. Automotive lubricant oils biodegradation: a case study
6.1 Purpose
Alternative means of determining when reducing conditions exist are provided from redox indicators. Generally, it is
observed that oxidized forms are colored and reduced forms are colorless. Due to this fact, such color change can be
monitored with a spectrophotometer, evaluating changes in redox indicator absorbance value.
The redox half reaction of a redox indicator is described by Equation 1 below. As the oxidized indicator reacts with a
reductant, the absorbance decreases and this way the reducing power of the sample can be estimated.
6.2 Material and methods
The biodegradability of automotive lubricant oil (synthetic, semi-synthetic, mineral and used) was evaluated using the
technique based on the redox indicator DCPIP. Hanson et al. [96] technique has been employed in other studies [74;
103; 104]. However, it has never been used in automotive lubricant oils and vegetable oils biodegradation evaluation
before.
Colorimetric assays were made using Bacillus subtilis CCT 2576 in NA medium cultures conserved at 10 C. The
cells were transferred from storage culture tubes and streaked onto a Petri dish with PCA medium. Then, microbial
culture reactivated after 48 h were inoculated to 50 mL of BH medium at 35°C for biomass growth. No agitation or
darkness conditions were applied. The BH medium contents are, g L-1
: MgSO4, 0.2; CaCl2, 0.02; KH2PO4, 1.0;
K2HPO4, 1.0; NH4NO3, 1.0; FeCl3, 0.05; according to Difco [105].
After 48 h in BH medium, B. subtilis culture was inoculated to tubes along with DCPIP indicator and the oil under
analysis. Tube contents followed Table 1 and the experiment was conducted in triplicate.
Table 1 Colorimetric assays content.
DCPIP BH B. subtilis inoculum Oil
Control 0 400 µL 7.5 mL - -
Control 1 400 µL 7.5 mL 100 µL -
Water 1 400 µL 7.5 mL - 50 µL of Synthetic Oil
Water 2 400 µL 7.5 mL - 50 µL of Semi-Synthetic Oil
Water 3 400 µL 7.5 mL - 50 µL of Mineral Oil
Water 4 400 µL 7.5 mL - 50 µL of Used Oil
Inoculum 1 400 µL 7.5 mL 100 µL 50 µL of Synthetic Oil
Inoculum 2 400 µL 7.5 mL 100 µL 50 µL of Semi-Synthetic Oil
Inoculum 3 400 µL 7.5 mL 100 µL 50 µL of Mineral Oil
Inoculum 4 400 µL 7.5 mL 100 µL 50 µL of Used Oil
Control assays (C0-1) evaluated interactions of the assay components and DCPIP indicator. C0 contained only
DCPIP indicator and BH medium. On the other hand, C1 presented DCPIP indicator, BH medium and B. subtilis
inoculum; and was done to determinate inoculum influences in DCPIP through time. Another series of blank assays,
named “Water” contained DCPIP indicator, BH medium and different types of oils (W1-4). Finally, “Inoculum” assays
were made up of DCPIP indicator, BH medium, B. subitilis inoculum and the different oils (I1-4).
The absorbance of all the assays was measured by Hach® DR 2500 spectrophotometer. Data was collected three
times per day, totalizing 230 h. Then, absorbance values were compared between different assays.
6.3 Results
The colorimetric analysis demonstrated that the biodegradation was successful. It occurred in all the oil containing
tubes, due to the general pattern whereby DCPIP loses of color.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
The control assays (C0 and C1) kept the blue color, whereas the oil containing assays passed through the
biodegradation process (W1-4 and I1-4). However, it was noticeable that the biodegradation time necessary for the blue
color to completely vanish was different between the different types of oils.
In the oil containing assays without B. subtilis inoculum, total biodegradation times for synthetic (W1), semi-
synthetic (W2), mineral (W3) and used (W4) were 210 h, 162 h, 138 h and 89 h, respectively. For the “Inoculum”
assays, the DCPIP color changes were 138 h, 125 h, 75 h and 87 h for synthetic (I1), semi-synthetic (I2), mineral (I3)
and used oils (I4). For example, Fig. 3 is representing the DCPIP decolorization process during the incubation time for
control and synthetic oil assays.
Fig. 3 DCPIP decolorization process through time (3, 137 and 210 hours, respectively) as observed in synthetic lubricant oil
biodegradation. From left to right, the five test tubes are: distilled water; C0; C1; Water1 and Inoculum1.
According to results and Fig.3, B. subtilis inoculum assays demonstrated a faster biodegradation compared to assays
without the bacteria. Even though no biomass was inoculated, biodegradation occurred in “Water” assays probably due
to previous microorganism presence in oils. Moreover, the total biodegradation time observed generally followed an
ascendant order: synthetic oil, semi-synthetic oil, mineral oil and used oil.
Regarding quantitative data, the absorbance readings of the DCPIP indicator are represented in Fig. 4.
In relation to Fig. 4a, a small decrease in DCPIP concentration can be noticed even in control assays. This decrease
indicates an overall pattern of natural disintegration of DCPIP chemical structure through time. Therefore, it cannot be
due to the Bacillus subtilis inoculum, since the DCPIP concentration decreases equally in both C0 and C1. Considering
this, even though the DCPIP concentration tends to naturally decrease, the tubes containing oils reduce the DCPIP
concentration even further because of biodegradation.
The results of Water and Inoculum assays for the different oils are presented in Figs. 4b, 4c, 4d and 4e.
Fig. 4 DCPIP concentration quantified at 600 nm absorbance (a) in C0 and C1 assays - without oils; and in oil containing assays
without (Water) and with (Inoculum) Bacillus subtilis (b) synthetic - 1; (c) semi-synthetic -2; (d) mineral - 3 and (e) used - 4.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
At the outset, the complete loss of color happened in the last measurement point plotted. So, the DCPIP was
considered reduced as a result of the biodegradation when the absorbance value led to a DCPIP concentration below
0.030 g L-1
. Values below this concentration could not be measured by this spectrophotometric method.
Another consideration regarding oils containing assays (Figs. 4b, 4c, 4d and 4e) is that all the decreasing curves
approach a linear model, except Fig. 4b and Fig. 4c, which are better fit to an exponential decay model.
As a pattern observed in the assays, DCPIP quantification demonstrated a tendency through time (Fig. 4a) but it was
not as significant as the DCPIP concentration reduction attributable to oil biodegradation by B. subtilis. These assays
presented a DCPIP absorbance decrease, which indicates a positive interaction of the bacteria in oil degradation, since
all “Inoculum” assays yielded a faster biodegradation. Also, “Water” assays presented a DCPIP concentration reduction
as they already previously contained microorganisms in oils.
6.4 Discussion
As a general pattern, used oils tend to be more easily biodegraded, biodegrading faster than the non-used retail available
samples. On the other hand, the synthetic and semi-synthetic automotive lubricant oils took the longest time (125 and
138 h, respectively) to completely change the color of DCPIP from blue to transparent, even with B. subtilis inoculum.
The mineral oil had an intermediate biodegradation value between the automotive lubricant oils.
Concerning the biodegradation of automotive lubricant oils, the process had been previously reported using different
methodologies, such as respirometric studies. In Lopes and Bidoia [36], the synthetic lubricant oil presented a better
biodegradation performance than the mineral and semi-synthetic lubricant oils.
Eisentraeger et al. [25] observed that used oils were more biodegraded than new ones, and proposed that this is due to
changes in the chemical structure of the hydrocarbons, facilitating the interactions between the oil and the
microorganisms. Also, the use of lubricant oil in engines, with high pressure and temperature, break the long
hydrocarbon chains, thus supporting microbial activity.
In conclusion, this rapid and simple colorimetric methodology applied to oils biodegradation promotes some
discussion leading to a better handling of contaminated water medium by oils and their respective biodegrading profile.
Thus, it promotes the development of new techniques in water treatment. From this data, the automotive lubricant oils
biodegradation occurs because hydrocarbons and organic polymers are used as metabolic substrates by microorganisms.
Also, some lubricant oil compounds such as cyclic alkanes are not biodegraded by only one microorganism. Hence, a
microorganism consortium allied to a known potentially oil metabolizing microorganism such as B. subtilis will also
perform an important role in degrading these compounds [106]. Therefore, a Bacillus subtilis inoculum yields a better
oil biodegradation.
7. Final considerations
Microorganisms represent an extremely reliable way to biodegrade petrol derived substances. This ability is highly
exploitable during bioremediation processes to ultimately free the environment from subsequent pollutants derived from
these hydrocarbons. The development of efficient techniques in order to obtain biodegradation data is a fundamental
tool when proposing different strategies for bioremediation of polluted areas. DCPIP redox indicator colorimetric
technique proved itself to be a rapid, easy and low cost method when detecting microbial metabolism from carbon and
other nutrients sources, including hydrocarbons. To ascertain microbial ability to utilize hydrocarbon substrates by
simply observing the color change of DCPIP, in which the quickest decolorization time represents the best oil
degradation, is a major breakthrough in biodegradation studies. Further studies in the applicability of this method and
other different redox indicators are recommended in order to reach a wide and precise selection of mediators capable of
detecting the metabolic perturbations caused by many types of substrates, even though DCPIP usage has already been
successfully reported for a wide range of situations.
Acknowledgements The authors thank FUNDUNESP; FAPESP; CAPES and CNPq for support.
References
[1] Winkelmann M, Hunger N, Hüttl R, Wolf G. Calorimetric investigations on the degradation of water insoluble hydrocarbons by
the bacterium Rhodococcus opacus 1CP. Thermochimica Acta. 2009;482:12–16.
[2] Atlas, RM. Bioremediation of petroleum pollutants. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 1995;35(1-3):317-327.
[3] Baheri H, Meysami P. Feasibility of fungi bioaugmentation in composting a flare pit soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials.
2002;B89:279–286.
[4] Bartz WJ. Lubricants and the environmental. Tribology International. 1998;31(1-3):35-47.
[5] Amund OO. Utilization and degradation of an ester-based synthetic lubricant by Acinetobacter lwoffii. Biodegradation.
1996;7:91-95.
[6] Hamblin P. Environmentally compatible lubricants: trends, stardants and terms. Proc. environmental aspects in production and
utilization of lubricants. Sopron. 1995;13-15.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
[7] Burns KA, Garrity S, Jorissen D, Macpherson J, Stoelting M, Tierney J, Yelle-Simmons L. The Galeta oil spill II: unexpected
persistence of oil trapped in mangrove sediment. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science. 1994;38:349-364.
[8] Wright MA, Taylor F, Randles SJ, Brown DE, Higgins IJ. Biodegradation of a synthetic lubricant by Micrococcus roseus.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1993,59(4):1072-1076.
[9] Lopes PRM, Domingues RF, Bidoia ED. Discard of plastic bottles and determination of automotive lubricant oil residues in Rio
Claro-SP. HOLOS Environment. 2008;8(2): 166-178.
[10] Matsumiya Y, Kubo M. Bioprocess handbook. 1st ed. Tokyo, NTS Publishing; 2007.
[11] Bhupathiraju VK, Krauter P, Holman HYN, Conrad ME, Daley PF, Templeton AS, Hunt JR, Hernandez M, Alvarez-Cohen L.
Assessment of in-situ bioremediation at a refinery waste-contaminated site and an aviation gasoline contaminated site.
Biodegradation. 2002;13:79–90.
[12] Alexander M. Biodegradation and Bioremediation. Academic Press, San Diego, USA; 1999.
[13] Margesin R, Schinner F. Bioremediation (natural attenuation and biostimulation) of diesel-oil-contaminated soil in an alpine
glacier skiing area. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2001;67(7):3127-3133.
[14] Leeson A, Hinchee RE. Soil Bioventing, Principles and Practice. CRC, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton; 1997.
[15] Norris RD. Handbook of Bioremediation. 1st ed. Boca Raton, CRC Press; 1994.
[16] Lin T, Pan P, Cheng S. Ex-situ bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010;176:27–34.
[17] Churchill SA, Harper JP, Churchill PF. Isolation and characterization of a Mycobacterium species capable of degrading three-
and four-ring aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1999;65(2):549–552.
[18] Kleinsteuber S, Riis V, Fetzer I, Harms H, Müller S. Population dynamics within a microbial consortium during growth on
diesel fuel in saline environments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72(5):3531-3542.
[19] Wang X, Bartha R. Effects of bioremediation on residues, activity and toxicity in soil contaminated by fuel spills. Soil Biology
and Biochemistry. 1990;22(4):501-505.
[20] Cunha CD, Leite SGF. Gasoline biodegradation in different soil microcosms. Brazilian Journal Microbiology, 2000;31:45-49.
[21] Balba MT, Al-Awadhi N, Al-Daher R. Bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil: microbiological methods for feasibility
assessment and field evaluation. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 1998;32:155-164.
[22] Höhener P, Duwig C, Pasteris G, Kaufmann K, Dakhel N, Harms H. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbon vapors:
laboratory studies on rates and kinetics in unsaturated alluvial sand. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2003;1917:1–23.
[23] Aichberger H, Hasinger M, Braun R, Loibner AP. Potential of preliminary test methods to predict biodegradation performance
of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. Biodegradation. 2005;16:115–125.
[24] Alisi C, Musella R, Tasso F, Ubaldi C, Manzo S, Cremisini C, Sprocati AR. Bioremediation of diesel oil in a co-contaminated
soil by bioaugmentation with a microbial formula tailored with native strains selected for heavy metals resistance. Science of
the Total Environment. 2009;407:3024–3032.
[25] Eisentraeger A, Schmidt M, Murrenhoff H, Dott W, Hahn S. Biodegradability testing of synthetic ester lubricants – effects of
additives and usage. Chemosphere. 2002;48:89-96.
[26] Battersby NS. The ISO Headspace CO2 biodegradation test. Chemosphere. 1997;34:1813–1822.
[27] Torstensson L. Microbial decomposition of herbicides in the soil. Outlook in Agriculture. 1988;17:120-124.
[28] Anderson AJ, Tucker B, Radtke C, Kown SI. Suppression of bioremediation by Phanerochaete chrysosporium by soil factors.
Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1995;41:251–265.
[29] Azadpour A, Powell PD, Matthews J. Use of lignin degrading fungi in bioremediation. Remediation Autumn. 1997;5:25–49.
[30] Niescher S, Wray V, Lang S, Kaschabek SR, Schlömann M. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2006;70:605–611.
[31] Perry JJ. Microbial metabolism of cyclic alkanes. In: Atlas RM. Petroleum Microbiology. New York, Macmillan Publishing
Co. 1984:61-97.
[32] Pritchard PH, Mueller IJG, Rogers JC, Kremer FV, Glaser JA. Oil spill bioremediation: experiences, lessons and results from
the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Biodegradation. 1992;3:315–335.
[33] Korda A, Santas P, Tenente A, Santas R. Petroleum hydrocarbon bioremediation: sampling and analytical techniques, in situ
treatments and commercial microorganisms currently used. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1997;48:677–686.
[34] Dua M, Johri AK, Singh A, Sethunathan N. Biotechnology and bioremediation: successes and limitations. Applied
Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2002;59:143–152.
[35] Aislabie J, Saul DJ, Foght JM. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated polar soils. Extremophiles. 2006;10:171–179.
[36] Lopes PRM, Bidoia ED. Evaluation of the biodegradation of different types of lubricant oils in liquid medium. Brazilian
Archives of Biology and Technology. 2009;52(5):1285-1290.
[37] Montagnolli RN, Lopes PRM, Bidoia ED. Applied models to biodegradation kinetics of lubricant and vegetable oils in
wastewater. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2009;63:297–305.
[38] Lopes PRM, Montagnolli RN Domingues RF, Bidoia ED. Toxicity and biodegradation in sandy soil contaminated by lubricant
oils. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2010;84:454–458.
[39] Chaîneau CH, Yepremian C, Vidalie JF, Ducreux J, Ballerini D. Bioremediation of a crude oil-polluted soil: biodegradation,
leaching and toxicity assessments. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 2003;144:419–440.
[40] Henry JA. Composition and toxicity of petroleum products and their additives. Human & Experimental Toxicology.
1998;17(2):111–123.
[41] Dott W, Feidieker D, Steiof M, Becker PM, Peter K. Comparison of ex situ and in situ techniques for bioremediation of
hydrocarbon-polluted soils. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 1995;301–316.
[42] Breedveld GD, Sparrevik M. Nutrient-limited biodegradation of PAH in various soil strata at a creosote contaminated site.
Biodegradation. 2001;11: 391-399.
[43] Wang Z, Gao D, Li F, Zhao J, Xin Y, Simkins S, Xing, B. Petroleum Hydrocarbon Degradation Potential of Soil Bacteria
Native to the Yellow River Delta. Pedosphere. 2008;18(6):707–716.
[44] Oudot J, Dutrieux E. Hydrocarbon weathering and biodegradation in a tropical estuarine ecosystem. Mar. Environ. Res.
1989;27:195–213.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
[45] Atagana HI, Haynes RJ, Wallis FM. Optimization of soil physical and chemical conditions for the bioremediation of creosote-
contaminated soil. Biodegradation. 2003;14:297–307.
[46] Vecchioli GI, Dei Panno MT, Painceira MT. Use of Selected Autochthonous Soil Bacteria to Enhance Degradation of
Hydrocarbons in Soil. Environmental Pollution. 1990; 67:249-258.
[47] Goldstein R, Mallory R, Alexander M. Reasons for possible failure of inoculation to enhance biodegradation. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology. 1985;50:977-983.
[48] Kanaly RA, Bartha R, Watanabe K, Harayama S. Rapid mineralization of benzo-a-pyrene by a microbial consortium growing
on diesel fuel. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000;66:4205–4211.
[49] Lendvay JM, Loffler FE, Dollhopf M, Aiello MR, Daniels G, Fathepure BZ, Gebhard M, Heine R, Helton R, Shi J,
Krajmalnik-Brown R, Major CL, Barcelona MJ, Petrovskis E, Hickey R, Tiedje JM, Adriaens P. Bioreactive barriers: a
comparison of bioaugmentation and biostimulation for chlorinated solvent remediation. Environmental Science and
Technology. 2003;37,:1422–1431.
[50] Silva E, Fialho AM, Sa-Correia I, Burns RG, Shaw LJ. Combined bioaugmentation and biostimulation to clean up soil
contaminated with high concentrations of atrazine. Environmental Science & Technology. 2004;38:632–637.
[51] Weston A, Balba T. Bioaugmentation. Innovation Technology Group. 2003;3(4):1–2.
[52] Karrick NL. Alteration in petroleum resulting from physical–chemical and microbiological factors. In: Effects of petroleum on
arctic and subartic environments and organisms nature and fate of petroleum, 1st ed., New York: Malins DC Academic Press,
1977:225–299.
[53] Bishop E. Indicators. 1st ed. Oxford, Pergamon Press; 1972.
[54] Lemmon TL, Westall JC, Ingle Jr JD. Development of redox sensors for environmental applications based on immobilized
redox indicators. Analytical Chemistry. 1996;68:947-953.
[55] Buchanan BB. Regulation of CO2 assimilation in oxygenic photosynthesis: the ferredoxin/thioredoxin system. Perspective on
its discovery, present status, and future development.. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 1991;288:1-9.
[56] Rabinowitz JD, Vacchino JF, Beeson C, McConnell HM. Potentiometric measurement of intracellular redox activity. Journal
of the American Chemical Society. 1998;120:2464-2473.
[57] Hwang C, Sinskey AJ, Lodish HF Oxidized redox state of glutathione in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science. 1992;257:1496-
1502.
[58] Hutchins SR, Sewell GW, Kovacs DA, Smith GA. Biodegradation of aromatic hydrocarbons by aquifer microorganisms under
denitrifying conditions. Environmental Science & Technology. 1991;25:68-76.
[59] Brock TD, Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Parker J. Biology of Microorganisms. 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall; 1994.
[60] Chapelle FH. Groundwater Microbiology and Geochemistry. 1st ed. New York, Wiley; 1993.
[61] Florou AB, Prodromidis MI, Karayannis MI, Tzouwara-Karayanni SM. Electrocatalysis of sulphide with a cellulose acetate
film bearing 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol. Application to sewage using a fully automated flow injection manifold. Talanta.
2000;52:465-472.
[62] APHA – American Public Health Association. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed.
Washington, American Public Health Association; 1995.
[63] Pasco N, Baronian KH, Jeffries C, Hay J. Biochemical mediator demand—a novel rapid alternative for measuring biochemical
oxygen demand. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2000;53:613-618.
[64] Wilkinson S, Klar J, Applegarth SP. Optimizing biofuel cell performance using a targeted mixed mediator combination.
Electroanalysis. 2006;18:2001-2007.
[65] Zhao J, Wang M, Yang Z, Wang Z, Wang H, Yang Z. The different behaviors of three oxidative mediators in probing the
redox activities of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2007;597:67-74.
[66] Bentley A, Atkinson A, Jezek J, Rawson DM. Whole cell biosensors - electrochemical and optical approaches to ecotoxicity
testing. Toxicol In Vitro. 2001;15:469-475.
[67] Heiskanen A, Yakovleva J, Spegel C, Taboryski R, Koudelka-Hep M, Emneus J, Ruzgas T. Amperometric monitoring of
redox activity in living cells: comparison of menadione and menadione sodium bisulfite as electron transfer mediators.
Electrochemistry Communications. 2004;6:219-224.
[68] Dawson RMC, Elliott DC, Elliott WH, Jones KM. Artificial and natural substrates: D. substrates for phosphatases. In: Dawson
RMC, ed. Data for Biochemical Research. New York, Oxford Science; 1986:352-3.
[69] Yoshida N, Hoashi J, Morita T, McNiven SJ, Nakamura H, Karube I. Improvement of a mediator-type biochemical oxygen
demand sensor for on-site measurement. Journal of Biotechnology. 2001;88:269-275.
[70] Konidari CN, Tzouware SM, Bowman LE, Karayannis MI. Kinetic and mechanistic study of the reaction of 2,6-
dichlorophenol-indophenol and cysteine. Talanta. 1992;39:863-868.
[71] Yari A, Kargosha K. Simple photometric determination of free cyanide ion in aqueous solution with 2,6-
dichlorophenolindophenol. Central European Journal of Chemistry. 2006;4:329-337.
[72] Rodriguez-Fernández J, Pereiro R, Sanz-Medel A. Optical fibre sensor for hydrogen sulphide monitoring in mouth air.
Analytica Chimica Acta. 2002;471:13-23.
[73] Nakamura H, Kobayashi S, Hirata Y, Suzuki K, Mogi Y, Karube I. A spectrophotometric biochemical oxygen demand
determination method using 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol as the redox color indicator and the eukaryote Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. Analytical Biochemistry. 2007;369:168-174.
[74] Mariano AP, Bonotto DM, Angelis DF, Pirollo MPS, Contiero J. Biodegradability of commercial and weathered diesel oils.
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2008;39:133-142.
[75] Long J, Ma J, Luo C, Mo X, Sun L, Zang W, Liu J. Comparison of two methods for assaying complex I activity in
mitochondria isolated from rat liver, brain and heart. Life Sciences. 2009;85:276-280.
[76] Florou AB, Prodromidis MI, Tzouwara-Karayanni SM, Karayannis MI. Fabrication and voltammetric study of lanthanum 2,6-
dichlorophenolindophenol chemically modified screen printed electrodes. Application for the determination of ascorbic acid.
Analytica Chimica Acta. 2000;423:107-114.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
[77] Patrik RA, Svehla G. Spectrophotometric and potentiometric study of the acid-base equilibria of indophenols in aqueous
media. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1977;88:363-370.
[78] Vernon LP, Zaugg WS. Photoreductions by fresh and aged chloroplasts; requirement for ascorbate and 2,6-
dichlorophenolindophenol with aged chloroplasts. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1960;235:2728-2733.
[79] Yamashita T, Butler WL. Inhibition of the Hill reaction by tris and restoration by electron donation to photosystem II. Plant
Physiology. 1959;44:435-438.
[80] Nakamoto T, Krogmann DW, Vinnesland B. The effect of oxygen on riboflavin phosphate-dependent photosynthetic
phosphorylation by spinach chloroplasts. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1959;234:2783-2788.
[81] Vernon LP, Shawl ER. Photoreduction of 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol by diphenylcarbazide: a photosystem 2 reaction
catalyzed by tris-washed chloroplasts and subehloroplast fragments. Plant Physiology. 1969;44:1645-1649.
[82] Alferov SV, Tomashevskaya LG, Ponamoreva ON, Bogdanovskaya VA, Reshetilov AN. Biofuel cell anode based on the
gluconobacter oxydans bacteria cells and 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol as an electron transport mediator. Russian Journal of
Electrochemistry. 2006;42:403-404.
[83] Bacsi A, Woodberry M, Widger W, Papaconstantinou J, Mitra S, Peterson JW, Boldogh I. Localization of superoxide anion
production to mitochondrial electron transport chain in 3-NPA-treated cells. Mitochondrion. 2006;6:235-244.
[84] Bissbort SH, Vermaak WJH, Elias J, Bester MJ, Dhatt GS, Pum JKW. Novel test and its automation for the determination of
erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase and its application to organophosphate exposure. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2001;303:139-145.
[85] Durliat H, Comtat M. Critical evaluation of potentiometric redox titrations in enology. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2005;545:173-
181.
[86] Jeng J, Kallarakal AT, Kim SF, Popov KM, Song BJ. Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1a isoform in rat testis: cDNA cloning,
characterization, and biochemical comparison of the recombinant testis and liver enzymes. Comparative Biochemistry and
Physiology Part B. 1998;120:205-216.
[87] Savongsy O, Fucharoen S, Fucharoen G, Sanchaisuriya K, Sae-ung N. Thalassemia and hemoglobinopathies in pregnant Lao
women: carrier screening, prevalence and molecular basis. Annals of hematology. 2008;87:647-654.
[88] Romanowska E, Drozak A, Pokorska B, Shiell BJ, Michalski WP. Organization and activity of photosystems in the mesophyll
and bundle sheath chloroplasts of maize. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2006;163:607-618.
[89] Kislyuk IM, Bubolo LS, Bykov OD, Kamentseva IE, Sherstneva OA. Protective and injuring action of visible light on
photosynthetic apparatus in wheat plants during hyperthermia treatment. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2008;55:613-
620.
[90] Wanapirak C, Sirichotiyakul S, Luewan S, Srisupundit K, Tongsong T. Comparison of the accuracy of
dichlorophenolindophenol (DCIP), modified DCIP, and hemoglobin E tests to screen for the HbE trait in pregnant women.
International Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics. 2009;107:59-60.
[91] Cabello CM, Bair WB, Bause AS, Wondrak GT. Antimelanoma activity of the redox dye DCPIP (2,6-
dichlorophenolindophenol) is antagonized by NQO1. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2009;78:344-354.
[92] Saratale G, Kalme S, Bhosale S, Govindwar S. Biodegradation of kerosene by Aspergillus ochraceus NCIM-1146. Journal of
Basic Microbiology. 2007;47:400-405.
[93] Facundo JM, Vanessa H, Teresa ML. Biodegradation of diesel oil in soil by a microbial consortium. Water, Soil, and Air
Pollution. 2001;128:313-320.
[94] Bonaventura C, Johnson FM. Healthy environments for healthy people, bioremediation today and tomorrow. Environmental
Health Perspectives. 1997;105:5-20.
[95] May SW, Katoposis AG. Hydrocarbon monooxygenase system of Pseudomonas oleovolans. Methods in Enzymology.
1990;188:3-9.
[96] Hanson KG, Desai JD, Desai, AJ. A rapid and simple screening technique for potential crude oil degrading microorganisms.
Biotechnology Techniques. 1993,7:745–748.
[97] Holliger C, Zehnder AJB. Anaerobic biodegradation of hydrocarbons. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 1996;7:326–330.
[98] Heider J, Spormann AM, Beller HR, Widdel F. Anaerobic bacterial metabolism of hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiology
Reviews. 1999;22:459–473.
[99] Grishchenkov VG, Townsend RT, Mcdonald TJ, Autenrieth RL, Bonner JS, Boronin AM. Degradation of petroleum
hydrocarbons by facultative anaerobic bacteria under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Process Biochemistry. 2000;35:889–
896.
[100] Boopathy R. Use of anaerobic soil slurry reactors for the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. International
Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2002;52:161-166.
[101] Massias D, Grossi V, Bertrand JC. In situ anaerobic degradation of petroleum alkanes in marine sediments: preliminary
results. Geoscience. 2003;335:435–439.
[102] Cormack WPM, Fraile ER. Characterization of a hydrocarbon degrading psychrotrophic Antarctic bacterium. Antarctic
Science. 1997;9:150-155.
[103] Roy S, Hens D, Biswas D, Kumar R. Survey of petroleumdegrading bacteria in coastal waters of Sunderban Biosphere
Reserve. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2002;18:575-581.
[104] Mariano AP, Tomasella RC, Martino CD, Filho RM, Seleghim MHR, Contiero J, Angelis DF. Aerobic biodegradation of
butanol and gasoline blends. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009;33:1175-1181.
[105] Difco. Difco Manual. 10th ed. Detroit, Difco Laboratories; 1984.
[106] Kubota K, Koma D, Matsumya Y, Chung S, Kubo M. Phylogenetic analysis of long-chain hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria
and evaluation of their hydrocarbon-degradation by the 2,6-DCPIP assay. Biodegradation. 2008,19:749-757.
_______________________________________________________________________________________