metro operations monthly performance may 2012...
TRANSCRIPT
metro operationsmonthly performancereport
metro operationsmonthly performancereportMAY 2012
12-0
163e
b ©
2011
LA
CM
TA
Page
Bus Overview 3
Bus Service Performance Systemwide 6In-Service On-Time PerformanceScheduled Revenue Service Hours Delivered
Bus Maintenance Performance 10Mean Miles Between Chargeable Mechanical FailuresPast Due Critical Preventive Maintenance Program
Attendance 14Maintenance Attendance
Bus Cleanliness 15
Rail Performance 18On-time ServiceIn-Service On-Time PerformanceSchedule Revenue Service Hours DeliveredMean Miles Between Chargeable Mechanical Failures
Safety Performance 24Bus Accidents per 100,000 Hub MilesBus Passenger Accidents per 100,000 BoardingsRail Accidents per 100,000 Revenue Train MilesRail Passenger Accidents per 100,000 BoardingsOSHA Injuries per 200,000 Exposure HoursLost Work Days Paid per 200,000 Exposure Hours
Customer Satisfaction 32Complaints per 100,000 Boardings
New Workers' Compensation Claims 34New Workers' Compensation Claims per 200,000 Exposure HoursOSHA Injuries Filed per 200,000 Exposure HoursNumber of Lost Work Days Paid per 200,000 Exposure Hours
"How You Doin'?" Incentive Program 41Monthly Metro Bus & Metro Rail
Table of Contents
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 2
Measurement FY09 FY10 FY11FY12
TargetFY12YTD
FYTD Status
Mar Month
Apr Month
May Month
Bus Systemwide Mean Miles Between Mechanical Failures Requiring Bus Exchange. (MMBMF)No. of unaddressed road calls
3,137386
3,222305
3,523125 3,650 3,737
463,775
43,552
03,863
0
Mean Miles Between Total Road Calls (MMBTRC) ** 1,290 1,566 2,052 1,556 2,266 2,285 2,362 2,500
In-Service On-time Performance *** 66.25% 72.33% 75.17% 85.00% 76.55% 76.60% 77.58% 75.52%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
3.06216
3.08245
3.23232 3.10 3.71
2273.99
163.14
203.88
22Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 2.76 2.61 2.53 2.20 3.12 3.43 2.70 3.11New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 9.30 10.36 13.43 12.50 Apr YTD
14.91Feb
20.84Mar
13.33Apr
14.33
** No FY12 MMBRTC target, FY10 target used.
Division 1MMBMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
2,64062
2,83136
2,6093 3,650 3,124
13,256
03,024
03,359
0MMBTRC 1,166 1,354 1,540 1,556 1,813 1,758 1,819 1,981In-Service On-time Performance 71.05% 76.61% 78.85% 85.00% 80.10% 80.46% 80.49% 79.03%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
3.0222
3.0749
3.4230 3.31 3.63
174.18
22.83
13.21
4Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 1.85 1.89 1.85 1.60 2.01 2.07 1.83 2.36New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 9.92 12.52 14.10 12.50 Apr YTD
12.91Feb
24.26Mar
12.38Apr
15.70
Division 2MMBMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
2,60844
2,71429
3,3788 3,650 3,286
53,465
12,860
03,405
0MMBTRC 1,255 1,475 1,721 1,556 1,818 1,994 1,849 2,018In-Service On-time Performance 72.72% 77.24% 73.89% 85.00% 74.22% 73.91% 75.60% 73.41%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
3.4325
3.1623
3.5621 3.45 4.45
224.81
12.91
05.87
3Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 2.03 1.87 2.02 1.77 2.29 2.52 1.79 2.29New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 11.14 12.93 16.86 12.50 Apr YTD
13.81Feb
18.09Mar
14.02Apr
20.00
Division 3MMBMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
2,55223
2,77024
2,9097 3,650 2,918
23,175
03,329
03,183
0MMBTRC 1,303 1,555 1,967 1,556 2,163 2,323 2,806 2,607In-Service On-time Performance 69.78% 76.81% 77.71% 85.00% 77.91% 77.47% 78.05% 77.21%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
3.600
3.390
3.280 3.05 3.27
243.60
33.89
22.95
5Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 2.69 2.65 2.51 2.17 3.12 3.71 2.79 3.28New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 9.50 8.84 11.61 12.50 Apr YTD
15.92Feb2.71
Mar17.74
Apr29.52
Metro Bus Systemwide and Division Scorecard Overview Metro Bus has eleven Metro operating divisions: Division 1 and 2, both operating out of the downtown Los Angeles area; Division 3 in Cypress Park; Arthur Winston Division 5 in South Los Angeles; Division 6 in Venice; Division 7 in West Hollywood; Division 8 in Chatsworth; Division 9 in El Monte; Division 10 in Los Angeles, near the Gateway building; Division15 in Sun Valley; and Division 18 in Carson. Metro Bus systemwide is responsible for the operation of approximately 2,490 Metro buses and 144 Metro Bus lines carrying nearly 373.1 million boarding passengers each year. Metro bus also operates the successful Orange Line.This report gives a brief overview of Systemwide and Division operations:
* Mean Miles Between Mechanical Failures Requiring Bus Exchange (MMBMF).* Mean Miles Between Total Road Calls (MMBTRC).* In-Service On-Time Performance.* Traffic Accidents per 100,000 Hub Miles. * Complaints per 100,000 Boardings.* New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours.
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 3
Measurement FY09 FY10 FY11FY12
TargetFY12YTD
FYTD Status
Mar Month
Apr Month
May Month
Division 5MMBMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
3,31416
3,4934
3,6432 3,650 3,109
23,200
02,854
03,108
0MMBTRC 1,420 1,712 2,053 1,556 1,743 1,815 1,855 1,875In-Service On-time Performance 64.43% 67.82% 74.63% 85.00% 78.32% 78.08% 79.02% 77.75%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
4.3229
4.4430
4.4224 4.37 5.65
248.32
23.70
15.70
0Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 1.88 1.90 1.84 1.57 1.99 2.01 1.72 1.72New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 12.75 14.78 12.43 12.50 Apr YTD
13.38Feb
26.53Mar
11.07Apr5.69
Division 6MMBMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
7,18611
7,8168
11,0211 3,650 13,063
025,767
012,932
049,664
0MMBTRC 1,307 2,172 3,008 1,556 3,720 3,964 3,695 4,966In-Service On-time Performance 56.98% 68.27% 69.28% 85.00% 78.74% 82.01% 81.69% 73.50%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
4.131
5.014
5.067 4.87 7.48
33.88
07.73
14.03
1Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 3.55 2.86 3.17 2.80 2.40 3.66 1.54 3.52New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 7.86 5.95 8.26 12.50 Apr YTD
8.80Feb0.00
Mar30.35
Apr0.00
Division 7MMBMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
3,39999
2,997101
3,10618 3,650 3,611
63,595
03,524
03,685
0MMBTRC 1,039 1,217 1,644 1,556 1,841 1,753 1,839 1,976In-Service On-time Performance 62.15% 68.38% 72.47% 85.00% 73.18% 74.17% 74.36% 72.33%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
3.8328
3.5552
3.8547 3.74 4.18
444.12
42.51
55.06
1Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 2.88 2.56 2.40 2.07 3.31 3.60 2.89 2.42New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 7.80 9.64 13.04 12.50 Apr YTD
12.08Feb
28.05Mar6.44
Apr8.89
Division 8MMBCMFNo. of unaddressed road calls 3,473 4,596
06,600
0 3,650 6,5452
6,6920
5,1510
5,4120
MMBTRC 1,707 2,445 4,348 1,556 4,896 5,080 4,395 4,323In-Service On-time Performance 69.29% 75.99% 79.00% 85.00% 78.59% 78.68% 79.83% 77.71%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
1.8712
2.2917
2.877 2.81 2.76
82.16
02.12
13.64
0Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 3.01 2.97 2.84 2.43 3.50 3.32 3.13 4.36New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 12.45 11.20 17.35 12.50 Apr YTD
20.12Feb
37.08Mar
11.74Apr
12.15
Division 9MMBMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
4,26762
4,67366
5,12611 3,650 5,266
115,184
05,352
04,932
0MMBTRC 2,425 2,918 3,489 1,556 3,787 3,910 4,008 3,780In-Service On-time Performance 70.01% 75.89% 76.33% 85.00% 76.82% 76.29% 77.08% 75.18%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
2.0714
2.013
1.8120 1.76 2.09
121.71
02.13
32.60
1Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 3.18 3.21 3.50 3.06 4.53 5.76 4.67 4.20New Workers' Compensation IndemnityClaims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 14.07 10.03 15.30 12.50 Apr YTD
16.33Feb
20.95Mar
15.19Apr
20.47
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 4
Measurement FY09 FY10 FY11FY12
TargetFY12YTD
FYTD Status
Mar Month
Apr Month
May Month
Division 10MMBMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
2,9471
2,59411
2,39258 3,650 2,642
112,341
22,415
03,127
0MMBTRC 1,015 1,129 1,446 1,556 1,709 1,606 1,687 1,991In-Service On-time Performance 61.90% 68.98% 71.93% 85.00% 73.61% 74.35% 75.04% 72.47%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 accidents"
3.8732
4.0233
3.9341 3.73 4.35
314.18
04.88
33.60
3Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 2.59 2.08 2.12 1.79 2.73 3.10 2.03 2.77New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 7.49 10.76 10.58 12.50 Apr YTD
12.38Feb
19.00Mar
11.04Apr6.82
Division 15MMBCMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
3,0031
3,3576
4,0970 3,650 4,442
04,329
04,202
04,799
0MMBTRC 1,291 1,747 2,507 1,556 2,876 3,007 3,025 3,415In-Service On-time Performance 69.06% 74.62% 76.84% 85.00% 76.85% 76.87% 78.41% 75.53%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
2.4526
2.6715
2.8419 2.75 3.07
173.79
21.88
12.37
2Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 3.08 2.98 3.01 2.56 3.78 4.11 3.24 3.74New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 11.89 14.11 11.73 12.50 Apr YTD
16.00Feb
20.36Mar
19.01Apr8.72
*Jan-June '07 ** Div 15 excluded (Nov. '05 data excluded --No
Division 18MMBCMFNo. of unaddressed road calls
3,42155
2,91720
3,50617 3,650 4.146
64,499
13,918
04,064
0MMBTRC 1,090 1,292 1,839 1,556 2,182 2,162 2,349 2,452In-Service On-time Performance 60.66% 66.12% 70.63% 85.00% 75.35% 75.13% 76.66% 74.15%Bus Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 MilesNumber of "482 alleged accidents"
2.7227
2.6719
2.9016 2.84 4.30
254.22
24.34
24.92
2Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 4.46 4.19 3.42 2.98 4.17 4.36 3.31 4.33New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag ) 8.95 11.06 13.65 12.50 Apr YTD
17.02Feb
16.11Mar
13.14Apr
17.61
NOTE: As of Aug. '07, Accident code 482 (alleged accidents) has been excluded from "Accidents per 100,000 Hub Miles" calculation per management decision.
Red - High probability that the target will not be achieved -- significant problems and/or delays (>70% of target).
Green - High probability of achieving the target (on track).
Yellow - Uncertain if the target will be achieved -- slight problems, delays or management issues.
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 5
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target.
IN-SERVICE ON-TIME PERFORMANCE
Systemwide TrendBus Operating Divisions
ISOTP By Division
ISOTP - 1 Minute Tolerance for Running Hot
BUS SERVICE PERFORMANCE
Definition: This performance indicator measures the percentage of scheduled buses that depart selected time points no more than 1 minute early and no more than five minutes later than scheduled. (Includes Rapid buses) Please note that Rapid Line performance is included in the ISOTP calculation beginning January 2010.Calculation: ISOTP% =1-((Number of buses departing early + Number of buses departing more than five minutes late)/(Total buses sampled))
80.0%85.0% 85.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
ON-TIME GOAL EARLY ON-TIME LATE
79.03% 73.41% 77.21% 77.75%73.50% 72.33% 77.71% 75.18% 72.47% 75.53% 74.15% 75.52%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Div.1 Div.2 Div.3 Div.5 Div.6 Div.7 Div.8 Div.9 Div.10 Div.15 Div.18 Systemwide
LATE ON-TIME EARLY
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 1
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 2
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 6
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target. Bus Service Performance - Continued
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 3
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 5
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 6
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 7
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 8
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 9
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 10
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 15
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 18
ON-TIME Goal Prior Year
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 7
FY11 FY12-YTD Variance FY11 FY12-YTD VarianceDivision 1 Division 8
Early 4.87% 3.25% -1.63% Early 4.36% 2.79% -1.57%On-Time 78.85% 80.10% 1.25% On-Time 79.00% 78.59% -0.40%
Late 16.28% 16.65% 0.37% Late 16.65% 18.62% 1.97%
Division 2 Division 9Early 6.35% 4.55% -1.80% Early 5.86% 3.10% -2.76%
On-Time 73.89% 74.22% 0.33% On-Time 76.33% 76.82% 0.49%Late 19.76% 21.24% 1.48% Late 17.81% 20.08% 2.26%
Division 3 Division 10Early 4.78% 3.67% -1.12% Early 5.25% 3.77% -1.48%
On-Time 77.71% 77.91% 0.20% On-Time 71.93% 73.61% 1.69%Late 17.50% 18.42% 0.92% Late 22.83% 22.61% -0.21%
Division 5 Division 15Early 5.27% 3.64% -1.62% Early 5.37% 3.70% -1.66%
On-Time 74.63% 78.32% 3.69% On-Time 76.84% 76.85% 0.00%Late 20.11% 18.04% -2.07% Late 17.79% 19.45% 1.66%
Division 6 Division 18Early 7.93% 3.62% -4.31% Early 5.09% 3.27% -1.81%
On-Time 69.28% 78.74% 9.46% On-Time 70.63% 75.35% 4.72%Late 22.78% 17.64% -5.15% Late 24.28% 21.38% -2.90%
Division 7Early 4.78% 4.42% -0.36% Early 5.22% 3.59% -1.63%
On-Time 72.47% 73.18% 0.72% On-Time 75.17% 76.55% 1.37%Late 22.75% 22.40% -0.36% Late 19.61% 19.87% 0.26%
Please note that Rapid Line performance is included in the ISOTP calculation beginning January 2010.
SYSTEMWIDE
Year-to-Date Compared To Last Year
ISOTP By DivisionsBus Service Performance - Continued
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 8
Remaining At the Goal line is the target.
ACTUAL TO SCHEDULED REVENUE HOURS DELIVERED by DivisionsMarch 2012 - May 2012
Systemwide Trend
Bus Service Performance - ContinuedACTUAL TO SCHEDULED REVENUE HOURS DELIVERED*
Definition: This performance indicator measures the percentage of scheduled Revenue Hours delivered after being offset by cancellations, outlates and in-service equipment failures. FY06: This performance indicator measures the percentage of scheduled Revenue Hours delivered after adding in temporary RH service added, Hollywood Bowl and Race Track RH, in addition RH due to overtime offset by cancellations and in-service delays.
Calculation: SRHD% = 1- ((In-Service Delay Revenue Hours plus Cancelled Revenue Hours) divided by (Total Scheduled Service Hours + Temporary Revenue Hours + Hollywood Bowl and Race Track Revenue Hours + In Addition Revenue Hours)) FY06: Actual Revenue Hours Delivered divided by Scheduled Revenue Hours.
99.0%
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
100.5%
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Goal Bus System Prior Year
99.0%
97.0%
97.5%
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
Div. 1 Div. 2 Div. 3 Div. 5 Div. 6 Div. 7 Div. 8 Div. 9 Div.10 Div.15 Div.18 Bus System
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Goal
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 9
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target.
BUS MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE MEAN MILES BETWEEN MECHANICAL FAILURES (MMBMF)
Definition: Average Hub Miles traveled between mechanical problems that result in a bus exchange.
Calculation: MMBMF = (Total Hub Miles / by Mechanical Related Roadcalls Requiring a Bus Exchange)
Unaddressed Road Calls -- Bus Operating DivisionsMarch 2012 - May 2012
Definition: Road calls cannot be counted, per FTA definition, if no one has jobbed on to assign a job code. (Source: M3)Calculation: Unaddressed Road Calls = Total number of road calls that have not been assigned.
Systemwide Trend
MMBMF -- Bus Operating DivisionsMarch 2012 - May 2012
3,500
3,650
3,650
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Sys. Goal Systemwide Prior Year
3,500 3,500
- 5,000
10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Goal
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Div 1 Div 2 Div 3 Div 5 Div 6 Div 7 Div 8 Div 9 Div 10 Div 15 Div 18
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 10
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target. Bus Maintenance Performance - Continued
-
1,500
3,000
4,500
6,000
7,500
9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 1
Div 1 Sys. Goal Prior Year
-
1,500
3,000
4,500
6,000
7,500
9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 2
Div 2 Sys. Goal Prior Year
-
1,500
3,000
4,500 6,000
7,500
9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 3
Div 3 Sys. Goal Prior Year
- 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 5
Div 5 Sys. Goal Prior Year
- 7,500
15,000 22,500 30,000 37,500 45,000 52,500
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 6
Div 6 Sys. Goal Prior Year
- 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 7
Div 7 Sys. Goal Prior Year
-
1,500
3,000
4,500
6,000
7,500
9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 8
Div 8 Sys. Goal Prior Year
- 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 9
Div 9 Sys. Goal Prior Year
- 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 10
Div 10 Sys. Goal Prior Year
- 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 15
Div 15 Sys. Goal Prior Year
- 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 18
Div 18 Sys. Goal Prior Year
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 11
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target.
Number of Buses Percent of BusesCNG 2,200 91.55%Diesel 71 2.95%Gasoline 59 2.46%Propane 73 3.04%Hybrid 0 0.00%Total 2,403 100.00%
Average Age of Fleet by Divisions
Div 1 Div 2 Div 3 Div 5 Div 6 Div 79.4 10.7 11.3 9.1 3.2 9.9
Div 8 Div 9 Div 10 Div 15 Div 184.5 9.5 8.7 5.7 6.3
MEAN MILES BETWEEN TOTAL ROAD CALLS (MMBTRC)
MMBTRC -- Bus Operating Divisions
MMBTRC Systemwide Trend
Fleet Mix by Fuel Type Systemwide (Including Contract Services)
Definition: Average Hub Miles traveled between road call problems.Calculation: MMBTRC = (Total Hub Miles / by Total Road Calls)
March 2012 - May 2012
1,556 1,556
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400
2,600
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Systemwide Goal Systemwide Prior Year
1,556 1,556
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Goal
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 12
Bus Maintenance Performance - Continued
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
Past Due Critical PMPs - by DivisionsMarch 2012 - May 2012
PAST DUE CRITICAL PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM JOBS (PMP’s) Definition: Average past due critical scheduled preventive maintenance jobs per bus. This indicator measures maintenance management’s ability to prioritize and perform critical repairs and indicates the general maintenance condition of the fleet.
Note: Since July 2004, six divisions (Divisions 1, 2, 3, 8, 9 and 15) have been involved in a pilot project to test extending maintenance critical PMP mileage periodicities. These "extended" mileages have not been officially implemented at this time; therefore, these divisions will appear not to have completed their critical PMP's in current monthly and weekly reports until the program is officially modified systemwide accordingly.
Calculation: Past Due Critical PMP’s = (Total Past Due Critical PMP’s / by Buses)Systemwide Trend
0.5 0.5
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12Goal Systemwide Prior Year
0.5 0.5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Goal
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 13
Higher is better.
Systemwide Trend
Maintenance Attendance - By Divisions (By Current Month)March 2012 - May 2012
ATTENDANCEMAINTENANCE ATTENDANCE
Definition: Maintenance Mechanics and Service Attendants - % attendance Monday through Friday for the month.Calculation: 1-(FTEs absent / by the total FTEs assigned)
95.0%
95.5%
96.0%
96.5%
97.0%
97.5%
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Current Year Prior Year
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
Div 1 Div 2 Div 3 Div 5 Div 6 Div 7 Div 8 Div 9 Div 10 Div 15 Div 18 Systemwide
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 14
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target.
Please note that beginning March 2010, quarterly cleanliness is calculated using monthly data.Prior quarterly data was supplied by QA dept. in a quarterly format. Remaining Above the Goal line is the target.
Cleanliness by Bus Operating DivisionsMarch 2012 - May 2012
FY01 Q1 - FY11 Q1
BUS CLEANLINESS
Quarterly Systemwide Bus Cleanliness
Definition: A team of two Quality Assurance Supervisors inspects and rates ten percent of the fleet at each division per time period. Beginning January 2004, they rate the divisions each month. Each of sixteen categories is examined and assigned a point value as follows: 1-3 = Unsatisfactory; 4-7 = Conditional; 8-10 = Satisfactory. The individual item scores are averaged, unweighted, to produce an overall cleanliness rating.
Calculation: Overall Cleanliness Rating = (Total Points Accumulated divided by number of categories)Bus Cleanliness - Systemwide
8.00 8.00
6.50 6.75 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 8.00 8.25 8.50 8.75 9.00 9.25 9.50
Div. 1 Div. 2 Div. 3 Div. 5 Div. 6 Div. 7 Div. 8 Div. 9 Div. 10 Div. 15 Div. 18 Systemwide
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Goal
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
8.00
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Systemwide Goal Prior Year
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 15
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target. BUS CLEANLINESS - Continued
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 1
Div. 1 Goal Prior Year
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 2
Div. 2 Goal Prior Year
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 3
Div. 3 Goal Prior Year
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 5
Div. 5 Goal Prior Year
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 6
Div. 6 Goal Prior Year
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 7
Div. 7 Goal Prior Year
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 8
Div. 8 Goal Prior Year
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 9
Div. 9 Goal Prior Year
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 16
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target. BUS CLEANLINESS - Continued
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 10
Div. 10 Goal Prior Year
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 15
Div. 15 Goal Prior Year
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 18
Div. 18 Goal Prior Year
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 17
Rail data not available in time for this report.
Measurement FY09 FY10 FY11FY12
TargetFY12YTD
FYTD Status
Mar Month
Apr Month
May Month
New Workers' Compensation Indemnity Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours (1 month lag )
6.03 8.54 9.73 10.17 Apr YTD9.00
Feb9.22
Mar12.08
Apr6.15
Metro Red Line (MRL)On-Time Pullouts 99.97% 99.55% 99.86% 99.00% 99.57% 99.78% 99.78% 98.51%Mean Miles Between Chargeable Mechanical Failures 41,482 38,771 34,194 35,000 35,181 39,634 28,559 39,325
In-Service On-time Performance 99.38% 99.54% 99.69% 98.00% 99.62% 99.82% 99.32% 98.98%Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 Train Miles 0.07 0.00 0.29 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 0.37 0.41 0.51 0.50 0.52 0.64 0.61 0.89
Metro Blue Line (MBL)On-Time Pullouts 99.74% 99.71% 99.10% 99.00% 99.47% 99.60% 98.80% 99.41%Mean Miles Between Chargeable Mechanical Failures 27,051 20,830 14,194 20,000 13,373 11,803 8,551 11,005
In-Service On-time Performance 98.24% 98.81% 99.11% 95.00% 97.38% 97.15% 97.63% 97.71%Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 Train Miles 1.26 1.45 1.76 1.69 1.40 2.50 1.18 0.46Complaints per 100,000 Boardings * 0.58 0.80 0.81 0.75 1.24 1.95 1.68 2.33* Includes Expo Line complaints.
Metro Green Line (MGrL)On-Time Pullouts 99.95% 99.89% 99.85% 99.00% 99.86% 99.75% 99.75% 100.00%Mean Miles Between Chargeable Mechanical Failures 19,195 13,599 11,831 20,000 14,977 17,647 14,804 12,041
In-Service On-time Performance 98.90% 99.26% 99.50% 95.00% 99.43% 99.56% 99.28% 98.83%Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 Train Miles 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 0.82 0.76 1.13 1.03 1.10 1.49 0.64 1.27
Metro Gold Line (MGoL)On-Time Pullouts 99.95% 99.86% 99.99% 99.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Mean Miles Between Chargeable Mechanical Failures 24,250 16,151 21,097 20,000 17,368 32,446 25,413 14,697
In-Service On-time Performance 99.38% 99.12% 99.58% 95.00% 99.44% 99.70% 99.28% 97.64%Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 Train Miles 0.21 0.82 0.61 0.54 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.70Complaints per 100,000 Boardings 1.50 1.68 1.22 1.11 1.57 0.81 1.03 1.24
Red - High probability that the target will not be achieved -- significant problems and/or delays.
Metro Rail Scorecard Overview
Green - High probability of achieving the target (on track).
Yellow - Uncertain if the target will be achieved -- slight problems, delays or management issues.
Metro Rail operates heavy rail lines, Metro Red and Purple Lines, from Union Station to North Hollywood and Union Station toWilshire/Western. Data for Red and Purple lines are reported under Metro Red line in this report. Metro Rail operates threelight rail lines: 1. Metro Blue Line from downtown to Long Beach; 2. Metro Green Line along the 105 freeway; and 3. Metro Gold Line from Pasadena and East Los Angeles. Metro Rail is responsible for the operation of approximately 104 heavy rail cars and 121 light rail cars carrying nearly 5.8 million passengers boarding each year.
This report gives a brief overview of Metro Rail operations: * On-Time Pullout Percentage.* Mean Miles Between Chargeable Mechanical Failures (MMBMF).* In-Service On-Time Performance.* Traffic Accidents per 100,000 Train Miles.* Complaints per 100,000 Boardings.
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 18
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target.
RAIL SERVICE PERFORMANCE
IN-SERVICE ON-TIME PERFORMANCE (ISOTP)
Calculation: ISOTP% = [(100% minus [(Total runs in which a train left any timecheck point either late or early) / by Total scheduled runs) X by 100)]
Definition: In-Service On-Time Performance measures the percentage of trains leaving all timecheck points on any run no earlier than thirty seconds, nor later than 5 minutes of the scheduled time. The higher the number, the more reliable the service.
98.0%
99.0%
98.0%
97.5%
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Heavy Rail (Red/Purple Line) ISOTP
Heavy Rail (Red/Purple Line) Goal
98.0%
99.0%
95.0%
92.5%
93.5%
94.5%
95.5%
96.5%
97.5%
98.5%
99.5%
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Light Rail (Blue, Green, & Gold Line) ISOTP
Light Rail Goal Blue Line Green Line Gold Line
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 19
Remaining At the Goal line is the target.
Scheduled Revenue Hours Delivered (SRHD) by Rail Line
Definition: This performance indicator measures the percentage of scheduled Revenue Service Hours delivered after subtracting cancellations, outlates and in-service delays.Calculation: SRSHD% = (1-(Total Service Hours Lost / by Total Scheduled Service Hours))
RAIL SERVICE PERFORMANCE - Continued
99.0%
98.9%
99.1%
99.3%
99.5%
99.7%
99.9%
100.1%
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Heavy Rail (Red/Purple Line) SRHD
Red Line Prior Year Goal
99.0%
95.5%
96.0%
96.5%
97.0%
97.5%
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Light Rail (Blue, Green & Gold Line) SRHD
Blue Line Green Line Gold Line LT Rail Prior Year Goal
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 20
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target.
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target.
Calculation: MVMBRVF = Total Vehicle Miles / Revenue Vehicle Systems Failures
Definition: Mean vehicle miles between Revenue Vehicle Failures. NTD defined Revenue Vehicle Failures are vehicle systems failures that occur in revenue service and during deadhead miles in which the vehicle did not complete its scheduled revenue trip or in which the vehicle did not start its next scheduled revenue trip.
RAIL SERVICE PERFORMANCE - ContinuedMean Miles Between Chargeable Mechanical Failures
26,000
20,000 20,000
4,500
9,500
14,500
19,500
24,500
29,500
34,500
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
LR GOAL Blue Line Green Line Gold Line
Light Rail (Blue, Green & Gold Line)
30,000
35,000 35,000
14,500
24,500
34,500
44,500
54,500
64,500
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
HR GOAL Red Line
Heavy Rail (Red/Purple Line)
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 21
One month lag in reporting.Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
RAIL SERVICE PERFORMANCE - Continued
Definition: Average number of new workers compensation indemnity claims filed per 200,000 exposure hours. Indemnity – requires an overnight hospital stay or involves more than 3 calendar days of lost time. This indicator measures safety.Calculation: New workers' compensation indemnity claims filed per 200,000 Exposure Hours = New Claims/(Exposure Hours/200,000)
NEW WORKERS' COMPENSATION INDEMNITY CLAIMS FILED PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURS
10.81
3.5
6.0
8.5
11.0
13.5
16.0
Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12
Rail Goal Ops Systemwide Claims Rail
Rail Combined (Blue, Green, Gold & Red/PurpleLine)
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 22
Rail data not available in time for this report.
Remaining Above the Goal line is the target.
Calculation: OTP% = [(100% - [(Total cancelled pullouts plus late pullouts) / by Total scheduled pullouts) X by 100)]
ON-TIME PULLOUTS (OTP)
Definition: On-time Pullouts measures the percentage of trains leaving the yard within ninety seconds of the scheduled pullout time. The higher the number, the more reliable the service.
RAIL SERVICE PERFORMANCE - Continued
98.0%
99.0% 99.0%
97.5%
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Heavy Rail (Red/Purple Line) Goal
Heavy Rail (Red/Purple Line)
98.0%
99.0% 99.0%
96.0%
96.5%
97.0%
97.5%
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Goal Blue Line Green Line Gold Line
Light Rail (Blue, Green & Gold Line)
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 23
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
SAFETY PERFORMANCEBUS TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 HUB MILES
Definition: Average number of Traffic Accidents for every 100,000 Hub Miles traveled. This indicator measures system safety.Calculation: Traffic Accidents Per 100,000 Hub Miles = (The number of Traffic Accidents / by (Hub Miles / by 100,000))
Systemwide Trend
Note: The thirteen months prior to the reporting month are re-examined each month to allow for reclassification of accidents and late filing of reports. As of Aug. '07, Accident code 482 (alleged accidents) has been excluded from "Accidents per 100,000 Hub Miles" calculation per management decision.
Bus Operating Divisions - by DivisionsMarch 2012 - May 2012
3.14
3.10
3.10
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.9
4.1
4.3
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Goal Prior Year Systemwide
3.31 3.453.05
4.374.87
3.74
2.81
1.76
3.73
2.75 2.84 3.10
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
Div. 1 Div. 2 Div. 3 Div. 5 Div. 6 Div. 7 Div. 8 Div. 9 Div. 10 Div. 15 Div. 18 Systemwide
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Goal
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 24
Safety Performance Continued
NOTE: Accident code 482 (alleged accidents) has been excluded from "Accidents per 100,000 Hub Miles" calculation per management decision.
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
BUS TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 HUB MILES
Number of 482 Accidents in Vehicle Accident Management System (VAMS) Download by Avoidable (A), Pending (P) or Unavoidable (U)
Bus Operating Divisions
Bus Operating Divisions
Definition: Number of accidents that are coded 482 "alledged" accidents in prior 13 months and the accident determination as avoidable (A), pending investigation (P) or unavoidable (U).
Calculation: Number of accidents in prior 13 months coded 482 "alledged" in the categories of A, P or U.
1
2
4
1 1
2
1
1
1 1
2
1
2
1
1
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
Div. 1 Div. 2 Div. 3 Div. 5 Div. 6 Div. 7 Div. 8 Div. 9 Div. 10 Div. 15 Div. 18
Total 482-A Total 482-P Total 482-U
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 1
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 2
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 3
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 5
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 25
Safety Performance Continued
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
BUS TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 HUB MILESBus Operating Divisions
02468
101214
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 6
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 7
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 8
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 9
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 10
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 15
012345678
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 18
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 26
Safety Performance Continued
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
Calculation: Passenger Accidents Per 100,000 Boardings = (The number of Passengers Accidents / by (Boardings / by 100,000))
March 2012 - May 2012Bus Operating Divisions - by Divisions
Systemwide Trend
Note: The thirteen months prior to the reporting month are re-examined each month to allow for reclassification of accidents and late filing of reports.
BUS PASSENGER ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 BOARDINGS
Definition: Average number of Passenger Accidents for every 100,000 Boardings. This indicator measures system safety.
0.260.30
0.15
0.25
0.35
0.45
0.55
0.65
0.75
0.85
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Systemwide Prior Year Goal
0.26 0.260.32
0.18
0.310.25
0.450.39 0.38 0.35
0.25 0.30
0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.901.001.101.201.301.401.50
Div. 1 Div. 2 Div. 3 Div. 5 Div. 6 Div. 7 Div. 8 Div. 9 Div. 10 Div. 15 Div. 18 SystemwideMar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Goal
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 27
Safety Performance Continued
One month lag from current month
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.One month lag from current month
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA) RECORDABLE INJURIES PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURS
Definition: Work-related injuries and illnesses that result in: death, loss of consciousness, days away from work, restricted work activity or job transfer, or medical treatment beyond first aid.Calculation: Number of OSHA Injuries / Illnesses Filed / (Exposure Hours / 200,000)
February 2012 - April 2012
OSHA Systemwide Trend and Rail
Note: The thirteen months prior to the reporting month are re-examined each month to allow for reclassification of injuries and late filing of reports.
OSHA: Bus Operating Transportation Divisions - by Division
OSHA: Bus Operating Maintenance Divisions - by Division
5.49
8.17
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12
Rail Goal Systemwide Goal Rail Systemwide
8.17
02468101214161820222426283032343638404244
M 1 M 2 M 3 M 5 M 6 M 7 M 8 M 9 M 10 M 15 M 18Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 Systemwide Goal
8.17
02468
101214161820222426283032
T 1 T 2 T 3 T 5 T 6 T 7 T 8 T 9 T 10 T 15 T 18Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 Systemwide Goal
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 28
Safety Performance Continued
One month lag from current month
One month lag from current month
February 2012 - April 2012
LOST WORK DAYS (LWD) PAID PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURS
Definition: Number of paid working days lost due to employees workers’ compensation injuries each month per 200,000 exposure hours.Calculation: (Total Temporary Disability Benefit Payments / Estimated TD Benefit Rate) x (5/7) / (Number of Exposure Hours / 200,000)
LWD Systemwide Trend
LWD/200,000 Exposure Hours per Operating Divisions - by Bus and Rail Division
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12
Systemwide Prior Year
0
250
500
750
1,000
1,250
1,500
1,750
2,000
2,250
2,500
2,750
3,000
3,250
Div 1 Div 2 Div 3 Div 5 Div 6 Div 7 Div 8 Div 9 Div 10 Div 15 Div 18 Rail Systemwide
Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 29
Safety Performance Continued
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
RAIL ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 REVENUE TRAIN MILES (PUC Reportable)Definition: Average number of Rail Accidents for every 100,000 Revenue Train Miles traveled. This indicator measures system safety.Calculation: Rail Accidents Per 100,000 Revenue Train Miles = (The number of Rail Accidents / by (Revenue Train Miles / by 100,000))
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12
Red Line Blue Line Green Line Gold Line HR Goal LR Goal
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Light Rail (Blue, Green & Gold Lines) Rail Accidents
Blue Line Green Line Gold Line LR Goal
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12
Red Line Blue Line Green Line Gold Line HR Goal LR Goal
0.10
0.20 0.20
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Heavy Rail (Red/Purple Line) Rail Accidents
Red Line HR Goal
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 30
Safety Performance Continued
Definition: Average number of Rail Passenger Accidents for every 100,000 Boardings. This indicator measures system safety.Calculation: Rail Passenger Accidents Per 100,000 Boardings = (The number of Rail Passenger Accidents / by (Train Boardings / by 100,000))
RAIL PASSENGER ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 BOARDINGS*
0.05
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Light Rail (Blue, Green & Gold Lines) Passenger Accidents
Blue Line Green Line Gold Line LR Goal
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Heavy Rail (Red/Purple Line) Passenger Accidents
Red Line HR Goal
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 31
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
Current Year Prior Year Goal
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
COMPLAINTS PER 100,000 BOARDINGS
Systemwide Trend
Bus Operating Divisions, by DivisionsMarch 2012 - May 2012
CUSTOMER SATISFACTIONCOMPLAINTS PER 100,000 BOARDINGS
Definition: Average number of customer complaints per 100,000 boardings. This indicator measures service quality and customer satisfaction.
Calculation: Customer complaints per 100,000 Boardings = Complaints/(Boardings/100,000)
1.60 1.772.17
1.57
2.80
2.072.43
3.06
1.79
2.562.98
2.20
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
Div 1 Div 2 Div 3 Div 5 Div 6 Div 7 Div 8 Div 9 Div 10 Div 15 Div 18 Systemwide
Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Goals
2.52
2.20 2.202.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12
Goal Prior Year Total Complaints/100K Brdgs
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 1
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 2
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 32
Current Year Prior Year Goal
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target. COMPLAINTS PER 100,000 BOARDINGS - Continued
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 3
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 5
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 6
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 7
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 8
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 9
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 10
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 15
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Div 18
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
M J J A S O N D J F M A M
Rail
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 33
One month lag from current month.
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.
One month lag from current month. Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.Transportation & Maintenance Performance combined.
WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMSNew Workers Compensation Claims per 200,000 Exposure Hours
Definition: Average number of new workers compensation indemnity claims filed per 200,000 exposure hours. Indemnity – requires an overnight hospital stay or involves more than 3 calendar days of lost time. This indicator measures safety.
Calculation: New workers' compensation indemnity claims filed per 200,000 Exposure Hours = New Claims/(Exposure Hours/200,000)
Bus & Rail by DivisionFebruary 2012 - April 2012
Metro Operations Trend
NEW CLAIMS PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURS - MONTH BY BUS DIVISION & RAIL
Definition: Average number of new workers compensation indemnity claims filed per 200,000 exposure hours. Indemnity – requires an overnight hospital stay or involves more than 3 calendar days of lost time. This indicator measures safety.Calculation: New workers' compensation indemnity claims filed per 200,000 Exposure Hours = New Claims/(Exposure Hours/200,000)
10.81
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Div 1 Div 2 Div 3 Div 5 Div 6 Div 7 Div 8 Div 9 Div 10 Div 15 Div 18 Rail
Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 Goal
12.44
9.50 9.50
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
17.5
Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12
Goal Systemwide Prior Year
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 34
One month lag in reporting.
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.One month lag in reporting.
One month lag in reporting.
Calculation: New workers' compensation indemnity claims filed per 200,000 Exposure Hours = New Claims/(Exposure Hours/200,000)
NEW WORKERS' COMPENSATION INDEMNITY CLAIMS FILED PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURSSystemwide and Bus Operating Divisions
Definition: Average number of new workers compensation indemnity claims filed per 200,000 exposure hours. Indemnity – requires an overnight hospital stay or involves more than 3 calendar days of lost time. This indicator measures safety.
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 1
Goal Systemwide T 1 M 1
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 3
Goal Systemwide T 3 M 3
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 5
Goal Systemwide T 5 M 5
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 6
Goal Systemwide T 6 M 6
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 2
Goal Systemwide T 2 M 2
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 7
Goal Systemwide T 7 M 7
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 35
NEW WORKERS' COMPENSATION INDEMNITY CLAIMS FILED PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURS - ContinuedRemaining Below the Goal line is the target.One month lag in reporting.
One month lag in reporting.
One month lag in reporting.
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 8
Goal Systemwide T 8 M 8
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 9
Goal Systemwide T 9 M 9
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 18
Goal Systemwide T 18 M 18
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 10
Goal Systemwide T 10 M 10
05
101520253035404550
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 15
Goal Systemwide T 15 M 15
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 36
One month lag in reporting.
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target.One month lag in reporting.
One month lag in reporting.
OSHA INJURIES FILED PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURSSystemwide and Bus Operating Divisions
Definition: Work-related injuries and illnesses that result in: death, loss of consciousness, days away from work, restricted work activity or job transfer, or medical treatment beyond first aid which are filed per 200,000 exposure hours.
Calculation: New OSHA Injuries filed per 200,000 Exposure Hours = New Injuries /(Exposure Hours/200,000)
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 3
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 3 M 3
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 2
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 2 M 2
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 5
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 5 M 5
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 6
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 6 M 6
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 1
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 1 M 1
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 7
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 7 M 7
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 37
Remaining Below the Goal line is the target. OSHA INJURIES FILED PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURS - Continued
One month lag in reporting.
One month lag in reporting.
One month lag in reporting.
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 8
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 8 M 8
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 9
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 9 M 9
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 18
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 18 M 18
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 10
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 10 M 10
0
10
20
30
40
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 15
Systemwide Goal Systemwide T 15 M 15
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 38
One month lag in reporting.
Lower is better.One month lag in reporting.
One month lag in reporting.
NUMBER OF LOST WORK DAYS PAID PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURSSystemwide and Bus Operating Divisions
Definition: Number of paid working days lost due to employees workers’ compensation injuries each month per 200,000 exposure hours. This indicator measures use of Transitional Duty Program.Calculation: : (Total Temporary Disability Benefit Payments / Estimated TD Benefit Rate) x (5/7) / (Numberof Exposure Hours / 200,000)
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 1
Systemwide T 1 M 1
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 3
Systemwide T 3 M 3
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 5
Systemwide T 5 M 5
-1,100-100900
1,9002,9003,9004,9005,9006,9007,900
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 6
Systemwide T 6 M 6
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 2
Systemwide T 2 M 2
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 7
Systemwide T 7 M 7
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 39
NUMBER OF LOST WORK DAYS PAID PER 200,000 EXPOSURE HOURS - Continued
One month lag in reporting.
Lower is better.One month lag in reporting.
One month lag in reporting.
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 8
Systemwide T 8 M 8
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 9
Systemwide T 9 M 9
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 18
Systemwide T 18 M 18
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 10
Systemwide T 10 M 10
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Div 15
Systemwide T 15 M 15
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 40
Weight Div 1 Div 2 Div 3 Div 5 Div 6 Div 7 Div 8 Div 9 Div 10 Div 15 Div 18Miles Between Total Road Calls 50% 1,980.60 2,017.80 2,607.20 1,875.30 4,966.40 1,975.70 4,322.50 3,779.70 1,990.60 3,414.70 2,452.30Points 3 5 7 1 11 2 10 9 4 8 6
Attendance 20% 0.980 0.983 0.978 0.971 0.991 0.986 0.978 0.977 0.975 0.979 0.978Points 8 9 4 1 11 10 5 3 2 7 6
New WC Claims /200,000 Exp Hrs* 30% 0.00 0.00 21.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.26 9.35 0.00 9.18 0.00Points 8 8 1 8 8 8 2 3 8 4 8*One month lag Totals 5.50 6.70 4.60 3.10 10.10 5.40 6.60 6.00 4.80 6.60 6.60
FINALRANKING DIV. DIV. 6 DIV. 2* DIV. 15* DIV. 8* DIV. 18* DIV. 9* DIV. 1* DIV. 7* DIV. 10 DIV. 3* DIV. 5*
*Placement change Score 10.10 6.70 6.60 6.60 6.60 6.00 5.50 5.40 4.80 4.60 3.10Rank 1st 2nd 3rd 3rd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th
"HOW YOU DOIN'?" PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PROGRAM
Maintenance
Maintenance Division Ranking (Sorted)
Metro Bus - MaintenanceDefinition: A performance awareness program designed to increase productivity and efficiency.
Monthly Calculations - May 2012ATMS upgrade has Transportation HYD data available and posted June 7, 2007.
10.10
6.70 6.60 6.60 6.606.00
5.50 5.404.80 4.60
3.10
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
DIV. 6 DIV. 2* DIV. 15* DIV. 8* DIV. 18* DIV. 9* DIV. 1* DIV. 7* DIV. 10 DIV. 3* DIV. 5*
Poin
ts
MAINTENANCE
Calculation: Performances by Division are ranked from best to worst. A score of 1 to 11 is assigned, with 11 being the best and 1 being the worst. Each score for each performance indicator is then multiplied by the weight assigned to the particular performance indicator and then summed. Summed values are sorted from high to low and the Division with the highest score wins the program award for the month.
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 41
Weight Div 1 Div 2 Div 3 Div 5 Div 6 Div 7 Div 8 Div 9 Div 10 Div 15 Div 18In-Service On-Time Performance 25% 0.790 0.734 0.772 0.778 0.735 0.723 0.777 0.752 0.725 0.755 0.741Points 11 3 8 10 4 1 9 6 2 7 5
Miles Between Total Road Calls 10% 3359.24 3405.10 3182.47 3107.60 49663.80 3685.23 5411.59 4931.81 3126.98 4799.01 4063.74Points 4 5 3 1 11 6 10 9 2 8 7
Accident Rate 25% 3.21 5.87 2.95 5.70 4.03 5.06 3.64 2.60 3.60 2.37 4.92Points 8 1 9 2 5 3 6 10 7 11 4
Complaints/100K Boardings 15% 2.36 2.29 3.28 1.72 3.52 2.42 4.36 4.20 2.77 3.74 4.33Points 9 10 6 11 5 8 1 3 7 4 2
New WC Claims /200,000 Exp Hrs* 25% 21.01 26.81 32.11 7.65 0.00 11.95 12.48 24.04 9.10 8.58 23.16Points 5 2 1 10 11 7 6 3 8 9 4*One month lagTotals 7.75 3.50 5.70 7.25 6.85 4.55 6.40 6.10 5.50 8.15 4.25
FINALRANKING DIV. DIV. 15 DIV. 1 DIV. 5 DIV. 6 DIV. 8 DIV. 9 DIV. 3 DIV. 10 DIV. 7 DIV. 18 DIV. 2
Score 8.15 7.75 7.25 6.85 6.40 6.10 5.70 5.50 4.55 4.25 3.50Rank 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th
Monthly Calculations - May 2012Metro Bus - Transportation
Definition: A performance awareness program designed to increase productivity and efficiency.ATMS upgrade has Transportation HYD data available and posted June 7, 2007.
Transportation
Transportation Division Ranking (Sorted)
"HOW YOU DOIN'?" PROGRAM - Continued
8.157.75
7.256.85
6.406.10
5.70 5.50
4.554.25
3.50
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
DIV. 15 DIV. 1 DIV. 5 DIV. 6 DIV. 8 DIV. 9 DIV. 3 DIV. 10 DIV. 7 DIV. 18 DIV. 2
Poin
ts
TRANSPORTATION
Calculation: Performance by Division are ranked from best to worst. A score of 1 to 11 is assigned, with 11 being the best and 1 being the worst. Each score for each performance indicator is then multiplied by the weight assigned to the particular performance indicator and then summed. Summed values are sorted from high to low and the Division with the highest score wins the program award for the month.
Metro Operations Monthly Report for May 2012 Page 42