method design a mixed methodology was used to enable the triangulation of data to develop an...

1
Method Design A mixed methodology was used to enable the triangulation of data to develop an understanding of palliative care for dementia and a model to fit this. Participants Thirty-nine interviews were conducted with professionals such as general practitioners, nurses, researchers, care home managers and policy leads. A further focus group was conducted consisting of six professionals from micro, meso and macro levels of health care services. Interviews took place within five European countries including the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Norway. Procedure 1.Three Literature reviews of indexed peer-reviewed publications were conducted. These are: Palliative care services for people with dementia: a synthesis of the literature reporting the views and experiences of professionals and family carers Palliative care for people with dementia: a review of reviews Evaluating educational initiatives to improve palliative care for people with dementia: a narrative review of the evidence 2.The existing literature surrounding palliative care and dementia was examined including documents such as the End of Life Care Strategy, National Dementia Strategy . 3.Face to face structured interviews or telephone interviews where face to face was not possible, were conducted with national experts in the five European countries. Four open questions were used. These include what aspects of palliative care for dementia professionals would wish to improve on and what they would want to export to another country. The interviews were supplemented by the use of vignettes. The vignettes described clinical cases based on existing literature. They were used to enhance the understanding of behaviour and attitudes in this area. Interviews were recorded for transcription or captured using contemporaneous note taking. Analysis Recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and together with the notes, will be analysed using thematic analysis. Results Interview Themes This is an on-going piece of research where additional participants will be interviewed to inform the continuous development of a model of palliative care for dementia. The interviews have so far revealed a variety of themes containing what currently work well for people dying with dementia and what would be recommend to other countries. These include: Gold Standards Framework (in England) Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) Doctors in nursing homes (the Netherlands) Home care (Italy – regional differences) In addition to what works well for people dying with dementia, the following themes have so far been identified as areas that need improvement for people dying with dementia: Education of staff/professionals Need for a structured system/pathway Palliative Care Model of Dementia Based on the themes and responses generated thus far from the interviews together with existing literature and literature reviews, the following model of palliative care has been developed. This is a model which will continue to develop and will aid the development and successful implementation of quality indicators. European Model of Palliative Care for Dementia: Study Protocol Nathan Davies 1 , Steve Iliffe 1 , Jill Manthorpe 2 and Sam Ahmedzai 3 1 UCL, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., London, NW3 2PF 2 Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, Aldwych, London, UK 3 Department of Oncology, The Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield Background With an ageing population, people living with dementia is expected to continually rise to 81 million affected by 2040 1 and 115 million worldwide by 2050 2 . Generally, as the disease progresses, memory and other cognitive deficits become worse, together with a loss in mobility, self-care abilities, poor nutrition, and a breakdown of skin. In the final stages, it is common to have urinary tract infections, skin ulcers, pneumonia and many other complications. As a progressive and eventually fatal illness, a palliative care approach for dementia is generally accepted as the best option. Over the past decade there has been increased attention and research into dementia and end of life care 3 . However, there is a general lack of research in this field 4 and more research is needed for this group of people. Despite the growing number of people with dementia and the fact that many palliative care services now care for non-cancer patients, people with dementia are rarely referred to such services 5 . Palliative care and models of care are well established and have long been used within cancer. However, this is still underdeveloped within dementia. Transferring these models of care directly from cancer may be inappropriate 6 and they may not be successful in dementia. Aim The aim of the current research is to gain an insight into palliative care for dementia across Europe. Using this information we aim to develop a model of palliative care for dementia which is suitable for European health care systems. The model will be used to identify and aid the implementation of quality indicators in this field. References (1)Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Fratiglioni L, Ganguli M, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2112-7. (2)Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer’s report, 2009. http://www.alz.co.uk/research/files/WorldAlzheimerReport-ExecutiveSummary.pdf. Accessed on 19/09/2011. (3)Van Der Steen JT. Dying with dementia: What we know after more than a decade of research. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 22 (1) (pp 37-55), 2010 Date of Publication: 2010 2010;(1):2010. (4)Sampson EL. Palliative care for people with dementia. British Medical Bulletin 96 (1) (pp 159-174), 2010 Date of Publication: December 2010 2010; (1):December. (5)National Council for Palliative Care. The power of partnership: Palliative care in dementia, 2009. (6)Sampson EL, Burns A, Richards M. Improving end-of-life care for people with dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry 2011 Nov;199:357-9. Bereavement Diagnosis and Prognosis Structured, iterative needs assessment & care planning, monitoring, symptom management, prognosis, diagnosis and attention to co-morbidities, personal and family wishes, psychosocial needs Generalists Non PC Specialists (e.g. Geriatrician) Active treatment Death End-of-life care: Self-care Rising risk Rising complexity PC Specialist PALLIATIVE CARE Fig 1. The basic model of palliative care in dementia. Fig 2. Quality indicators of good end of life care and of a good death related to outcome in dementia. Fig 3. Quality indicators of good palliative care related to structure in dementia. UK example: Liverpool Care Pathway Prior preferences established with family involvement & patient: advanced directives etc. UK example: Gold Standard Framework in operation; pain control: use of assessment tools, psychosocial needs met; Nutrition: assessed, few PEG tubes used; Infection management agreed; Prognostication tools used Training and continuous learning; audit of outcomes Stable leadership & workforce, staff skill mix Evidence of increased skills Evidence of care co- ordination Community orientation Bereavement Diagnosis and Prognosis Structured, iterative needs assessment & care planning, monitoring, symptom management, prognosis, diagnosis and attention to co-morbidities, personal and family wishes, psychosocial needs Generalists Non PC Specialists (e.g. Geriatrician) Active treatment Death End-of-life care: Self-care Rising risk Rising complexity PC Specialist PALLIATIVE CARE Fidelity to prior preferences Symptoms controlled Family satisfaction Appropriate setting (home or hospital) Psychological & Spiritual needs met Bereavement Diagnosis and Prognosis Structured, iterative needs assessment & care planning, monitoring, symptom management, prognosis, diagnosis and attention to co-morbidities, personal and family wishes, psychosocial needs Generalists Non PC Specialists (e.g. Geriatrician) Active treatment Death End-of-life care: Self-care Rising risk Rising complexity PC Specialist PALLIATIVE CARE If you would like further information please contact Nathan Davies: [email protected] Conclusions It is possible to collaborate across European countries using mixed methodologies to produce a complex model of palliative care which is capable of aiding the development and implementation of quality indicators. More interviews will be conducted to identify themes in order to improve palliative care for dementia. This model will then be used to develop and implement quality indicators to improve palliative care for dementia.

Upload: elijah-harrison

Post on 23-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Method Design A mixed methodology was used to enable the triangulation of data to develop an understanding of palliative care for dementia and a model

Method

DesignA mixed methodology was used to enable the triangulation of data to develop an understanding of palliative care for dementia and a model to fit this.

ParticipantsThirty-nine interviews were conducted with professionals such as general practitioners, nurses, researchers, care home managers and policy leads. A further focus group was conducted consisting of six professionals from micro, meso and macro levels of health care services. Interviews took place within five European countries including the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Norway.

Procedure

1.Three Literature reviews of indexed peer-reviewed publications were conducted. These are:• Palliative care services for people with dementia: a synthesis of the literature reporting the views and

experiences of professionals and family carers• Palliative care for people with dementia: a review of reviews• Evaluating educational initiatives to improve palliative care for people with dementia: a narrative review of

the evidence

2.The existing literature surrounding palliative care and dementia was examined including documents such as the End of Life Care Strategy, National Dementia Strategy .

3.Face to face structured interviews or telephone interviews where face to face was not possible, were conducted with national experts in the five European countries. Four open questions were used. These include what aspects of palliative care for dementia professionals would wish to improve on and what they would want to export to another country. The interviews were supplemented by the use of vignettes. The vignettes described clinical cases based on existing literature. They were used to enhance the understanding of behaviour and attitudes in this area. Interviews were recorded for transcription or captured using contemporaneous note taking.

AnalysisRecorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and together with the notes, will be analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Interview Themes

This is an on-going piece of research where additional participants will be interviewed to inform the continuous development of a model of palliative care for dementia. The interviews have so far revealed a variety of themes containing what currently work well for people dying with dementia and what would be recommend to other countries. These include:

Gold Standards Framework (in England)Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP)Doctors in nursing homes (the Netherlands)Home care (Italy – regional differences)

In addition to what works well for people dying with dementia, the following themes have so far been identified as areas that need improvement for people dying with dementia:

Education of staff/professionalsNeed for a structured system/pathwayDiagnosis/Prognosis/Recognition of dementiaCommunication Advanced Care PlanningCoordinator/case manager

Palliative Care Model of Dementia

Based on the themes and responses generated thus far from the interviews together with existing literature and literature reviews, the following model of palliative care has been developed. This is a model which will continue to develop and will aid the development and successful implementation of quality indicators.

European Model of Palliative Care for Dementia: Study Protocol

Nathan Davies1, Steve Iliffe1, Jill Manthorpe2 and Sam Ahmedzai3

1UCL, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., London, NW3 2PF

2Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, Aldwych, London, UK3Department of Oncology, The Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield

BackgroundWith an ageing population, people living with dementia is expected to continually rise to 81 million affected by 20401 and 115 million worldwide by 20502. Generally, as the disease progresses, memory and other cognitive deficits become worse, together with a loss in mobility, self-care abilities, poor nutrition, and a breakdown of skin. In the final stages, it is common to have urinary tract infections, skin ulcers, pneumonia and many other complications. As a progressive and eventually fatal illness, a palliative care approach for dementia is generally accepted as the best option.

Over the past decade there has been increased attention and research into dementia and end of life care3. However, there is a general lack of research in this field4 and more research is needed for this group of people.

Despite the growing number of people with dementia and the fact that many palliative care services now care for non-cancer patients, people with dementia are rarely referred to such services5. Palliative care and models of care are well established and have long been used within cancer. However, this is still underdeveloped within dementia. Transferring these models of care directly from cancer may be inappropriate6 and they may not be successful in dementia.

AimThe aim of the current research is to gain an insight into palliative care for dementia across Europe. Using this information we aim to develop a model of palliative care for dementia which is suitable for European health care systems. The model will be used to identify and aid the implementation of quality indicators in this field.

References

(1)Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Fratiglioni L, Ganguli M, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2112-7.(2)Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer’s report, 2009. http://www.alz.co.uk/research/files/WorldAlzheimerReport-ExecutiveSummary.pdf. Accessed on 19/09/2011. (3)Van Der Steen JT. Dying with dementia: What we know after more than a decade of research. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 22 (1) (pp 37-55), 2010 Date of Publication: 2010 2010;(1):2010.(4)Sampson EL. Palliative care for people with dementia. British Medical Bulletin 96 (1) (pp 159-174), 2010 Date of Publication: December 2010 2010;(1):December.(5)National Council for Palliative Care. The power of partnership: Palliative care in dementia, 2009.(6)Sampson EL, Burns A, Richards M. Improving end-of-life care for people with dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry 2011 Nov;199:357-9.

Bereavement

Diagnosis and

Prognosis

Structured, iterative needs assessment & care planning, monitoring, symptom management, prognosis, diagnosis and attention to co-morbidities, personal and family wishes, psychosocial needs

 

GeneralistsNon PC Specialists

(e.g. Geriatrician)

Active treatmentDeath

End-of-life care: Self-care Rising risk Rising complexity

 

PC Specialist

PALLIATIVE CARE

Fig 1. The basic model of palliative care in dementia.

Fig 2. Quality indicators of good end of life care and of a good death related to outcome in dementia.

Fig 3. Quality indicators of good palliative care related to structure in dementia.

UK example: Liverpool Care PathwayPrior preferences established with family involvement & patient: advanced directives etc.

UK example: Gold Standard Framework in operation; pain control: use of assessment tools, psychosocial needs met; Nutrition: assessed, few PEG tubes

used; Infection management agreed; Prognostication tools usedTraining and

continuous learning; audit of outcomes

Stable leadership & workforce, staff skill mix

Evidence of increased skillsEvidence of care co-ordination

Community orientation

Bereavement

Diagnosis and

Prognosis

Structured, iterative needs assessment & care planning, monitoring, symptom management, prognosis, diagnosis and attention to co-morbidities, personal and family wishes, psychosocial needs

 

GeneralistsNon PC Specialists

(e.g. Geriatrician)

Active treatmentDeath

End-of-life care: Self-care Rising risk Rising complexity

 

PC Specialist

PALLIATIVE CARE

Fidelity to prior preferencesSymptoms controlledFamily satisfactionAppropriate setting (home or hospital)Psychological & Spiritual needs met

Bereavement

Diagnosis and

Prognosis

Structured, iterative needs assessment & care planning, monitoring, symptom management, prognosis, diagnosis and attention to co-morbidities, personal and family wishes, psychosocial needs

 

GeneralistsNon PC Specialists

(e.g. Geriatrician)

Active treatmentDeath

End-of-life care: Self-care Rising risk Rising complexity

 

PC Specialist

PALLIATIVE CARE

If you would like further information please contact Nathan Davies: [email protected]

Conclusions

It is possible to collaborate across European countries using mixed methodologies to produce a complex model of palliative care which is capable of aiding the development and implementation of quality indicators. More interviews will be conducted to identify themes in order to improve palliative care for dementia. This model will then be used to develop and implement quality indicators to improve palliative care for dementia.