metabolic profiling of ripening strawberry (fragaria x ananassa)
TRANSCRIPT
Strawberries are regularly consumed for the unique flavor and nutritional value. A greater understanding of the biochemistry of fruit ripening in different strawberry cultivars can help deliver higher quality produce to consumers. Botanically the strawberry fruit are actually the achenes or seeds that cover the surface of a modified shoot or flower receptacle. Different cultivars and physiological changes that occur throughout fruit growth and ripening influence the metabolic profile. Fruit quality characteristics are based on the metabolites present at the ripe harvest stage. Metabolite profiling explores both core (primary) and specialized (secondary) metabolite compounds. This comprehensive study integrates metabolites detected in four strawberry (F. x ananassa) cultivars (Festival, Sensation, Winterstar, and Radiance) by separating receptacle (flesh) and achene (seed) tissue samples during six ripening stages (ripe, turning, white, large green, medium green, small green). Metabolites were investigated using non-targeted GC-MS, and targeted UPLC-qTOF-MS profiling. Correlation analysis was used to differentiate cluster patterns of metabolite profiles and ANOVA statistical significance was used to identify metabolites of interest.
Ashlyn Wedde*1, 2, Mahmoud Gargouri1, Jeong-Jin Park1, Michael Schwieterman3, Thomas Colquhoun3, David R. Gang1 1Institute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
2Molecular Plant Science Graduate Program, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 3 IFAS Plant Innovation Program , Gainesville, FL
METABOLIC PROFILING OF RIPENING STRAWBERRY (Fragaria x ananassa)
Abstract Strawberry Metabolic Correlation ‘Ripe’ Metabolite Comparison
Research Fellowship: NIH Protein Biotechnology Training Program, WSU Instrumentation: NSF MRI grant #1229749
Institute of Biological Chemistry & Dr. David Gang’s Laboratory for Cellular Metabolism and Engineering for experimental equipment support.
Overall Experimental workflow. Strawberry cultivars including Festival, Winterstar, Radiance, and Sensation were assayed to generate a metabolite profile model to determine correlations at time points through development. Proteomic studies are underway to identify unique expressed proteins. Transcriptome data has already been published by other scientists.
References & Acknowledgements
Research Plan
Data Acquisition, Processing, Analysis & Interpretation
Highlights & Conclusions Metabolomics enables better understanding and characterization of fruit across ripening. • Experimentally, we determine valuable
information for localization of specific metabolites in different tissues, and at different abundances through development.
Future Direction • Plant and human health are important focuses
for trait enhancement and clinical studies. • Metabolic correlation studies will supply gene
candidates for quality fruit, flavor & health targets.
Winterstar™
Overall Likability
Sweetness Intensity
Texture Liking
Highest Sucrose Content
‘Strawberry Festival’
Overall Strawberry Flavor
Total Volatiles
Diversity of Volatiles
Sensation™
Total Sugar Content (Suc, Fru,
Glc)
Diversity of Volatiles
‘Florida Radiance’
Transcriptome F. vesca genome, RNA-seq, microarrays etc.
Identify differentially expressed genes
Metabolome Metabolite profiling
Identify metabolites with modeling
Proteome Proteomic Profiling
Identify expressed proteins
Network Analysis Determine overall network correlation
I f strawberry CULTIVARS di f fer in CONSUMER ‘LIKABILITY’, then they must differ in the makeup of a strawberry.
(Schwieterman et al., 2014)
Achene Receptacle
Imm
ature M
ature
Time
Ellagic acid
Cv: Fest-RcptCv: Rad-RcptCv: Sens-RcptCv: Wint-RcptSG MG LG W T R
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Time
Kaem
pferol hexose glucuronide
Cv: Fest-RcptCv: Rad-RcptCv: Sens-RcptCv: Wint-RcptSG MG LG W T R
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Time
Kaem
pferol glucuronide
Cv: Fest-RcptCv: Rad-RcptCv: Sens-RcptCv: Wint-RcptSG MG LG W T R
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Phyt
onut
rien
ts
Plan
t D
efen
se
Frui
t qu
ality
Time
cis-Re
sveratrol glucuronide
Cv: Fest-RcptCv: Rad-RcptCv: Sens-RcptCv: Wint-RcptSG MG LG W T R
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Time
Procyanidin trimer
Cv: Fest-RcptCv: Rad-RcptCv: Sens-RcptCv: Wint-RcptSG MG LG W T R
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Time
Procyanidin
Cv: Fest-RcptCv: Rad-RcptCv: Sens-RcptCv: Wint-RcptSG MG LG W T R
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Time
apigenin
Cv: Fest-RcptCv: Rad-RcptCv: Sens-RcptCv: Wint-RcptSG MG LG W T R
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Time
Propelargonidin trimer
Cv: Fest-RcptCv: Rad-RcptCv: Sens-RcptCv: Wint-RcptSG MG LG W T R
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Time
trite
rpenoid hexose
Cv: Fest-RcptCv: Rad-RcptCv: Sens-RcptCv: Wint-RcptSG MG LG W T R
-0.20.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.02.22.42.62.8
Heat map displays the abundance values of metabolites identified in the ‘ripe’ stage for the four cultivars of receptacle and achene tissue. The top axis, groups samples by respective cultivars in the achene and receptacle tissue. The y-axis displays the compounds within their respective compound classes. The heat map uses a multi-fold color change; blue corresponds to the bottom 10 percentile of data values, green is the median, and yellow represents the top 90 percentile of values. Each cell corresponds to the mean abundance intensity of a specific metabolite at a specific time point within a certain cultivar. Tissue is normalized per gram fresh weight and relative to actual berry composition.
Time
cis-Re
sveratrol glucuronide
Cv: Fest-AchCv: Rad-AchCv: Sens-AchCv: Wint-AchSG MG LG W T R
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Time
Procyanidin
Cv: Fest-AchCv: Rad-AchCv: Sens-AchCv: Wint-AchSG MG LG W T R
2468101214161820222426283032
Time
Propelargonidin trimer
Cv: Fest-AchCv: Rad-AchCv: Sens-AchCv: Wint-AchSG MG LG W T R
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Time
Ellagic acid
Cv: Fest-AchCv: Rad-AchCv: Sens-AchCv: Wint-AchSG MG LG W T R
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
Time
Procyanidin trimer
Cv: Fest-AchCv: Rad-AchCv: Sens-AchCv: Wint-AchSG MG LG W T R
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Time
Kaem
pferol malonyl hexose
Cv: Fest-AchCv: Rad-AchCv: Sens-AchCv: Wint-AchSG MG LG W T R
-20020406080100120140160180200220240260
Time
Kaempferol hexose
Cv: Fest-AchCv: Rad-AchCv: Sens-AchCv: Wint-AchSG MG LG W T R
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Time
(Epi)catechin
Cv: Fest-AchCv: Rad-AchCv: Sens-AchCv: Wint-AchSG MG LG W T R
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Time
Digalloyl-H
HDP
-glucose
Cv: Fest-AchCv: Rad-AchCv: Sens-AchCv: Wint-AchSG MG LG W T R
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Phyt
onut
rien
ts
Plan
t D
efen
se
Frui
t qu
ality
Specific Metabolite Plots during Development
Achene Receptacle
‘F. Festival’ Achene and Receptacle Network Correlation. Immature stages (small, medium, and large green), and mature (white, turning, ripe). Blue bubble designates primary metabolites, red bubble designates secondary metabolites, blue line is a negative correlation, and a red line is a positive correlation. Correlation cut off values 0.8 and -0.8.
Specialized metabolite abundance in receptacle (green background) and achene tissue (blue background) displayed using line graphs across the six developmental stages. All 4 cultivars are represented, ‘Florida Festival’ (blue squares), ‘Florida Radiance’ (orange circles), Sensation™ (green diamonds), and Winterstar™ (gray triangles). Replicate error is taken into account with the vertical line at each stage. The metabolite is labeled on the left y-axis along with its respective abundance values.
Experimental Process. Metabolite Extraction. Achene and receptacle tissue was separated using needle-nose forceps on liquid nitrogen. Frozen tissue (50-500 mg) was extracted using MeOH:IPA:H2O for primary metabolites. Samples were vortexed, sonicated, and centrifuged. Then dried in-vacuum. Derivatization was performed by dissolving dried sample in MeOX HCl /pyridine for 90 minutes at 30˚C. Then MSTFA was added and incubated 30-min at 37˚C. GC-MS Analysis was performed using hot needle injection technique at 230 ˚C. Mass Spectra was collected between 50-1000 m/z. Primary metabolites were identified across development using the NIST Library for GC-MS metabolite identification. Pegasus software was used to process spectra, align samples based on retention times and identify metabolites. Secondary metabolites were extracted with MeOH vortexed, sonicated, and centrifuged. UPLC acquisition was performed with full loop injection into a C18 column using UV detector, mobile phase 0.1% FA in H2O: ACN; 9:1. Spectra was collected between 50-1000 m/z. MS/MS was performed using ramp collision energy between 15-90V. Progenesis QI Metabolomics software was used to identify secondary metabolites by precursor mass accuracy, retention times, MS/MS fragments, and isotope distribution. All experiments were completed in triplicate.