meta-systems, complexity, and emergence kent d. palmer cser 2008 080404 [email protected]

28
Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 [email protected] http://archonic.net http://holonomic.net

Upload: emily-frost

Post on 27-Mar-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence

Kent D. Palmer

CSER 2008

080404

[email protected]

http://archonic.net http://holonomic.net

Page 2: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Papers for CSER Conference

• The Failure of Systems Engineering as an approach toward Complex Adaptive Systems in our major Customer’s Eyes: – Analysis of the Capstone Concept for Joint

Operations and its relation to Meta-systems Theory

• Emergence and Complexity in relation to General Schemas Theory– A point of discussion within the Systems Science

Enabler Technical Working Group of INCOSE

Page 3: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Meta-system Primer• This brief primer will help readers to

understand the papers associated with this conference

• In order to understand the points of my paper it is necessary to explain Meta-systems in relation to Systems

• Meta-systems offer a different way to look at things than Systems

Page 4: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Two different Schemas

Meta-System ≠ System of Systems

System

(Super-system)

Sub-system

Page 5: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

What is a Schema

• A projected organization of envelopes of spacetime which is a template for the pre-understanding of perceptual objects

• The term “System” is over-used and has lost its meaning. To get that meaning back we must compare it with other similar concepts of the same type that have a family resemblance but at different scales

• The history of the term Schema is discussed by Umberto Eco in Kant and the Platypus– By Schema we mean what he calls the “Mathematical and

Geometrical Schemas,” not the many other meanings of the term he mentions. This is the most basic type of schema, i.e. the type that allows us to reference an object in spacetime.

Page 6: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

System and Meta-system Formalization

Turning MachineRepresentation

(Gurevich Abstract State Machine)

System“Application”

Normal Turing MachineSystem dynamics

with negative feedback

Meta-system“Operating System”

Universal Turing MachineSystem dynamics

with positive feedback

Page 7: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Bataille “Accursed Share”

• General Economy• Meta-system• International waters• Lawlessness of the

high seas• Piracy, reflaging

ships, contraband and smuggling

• Restricted Economy• System• Nation states control

what is within their borders, ideally

• Really the state is a meta-system inside = black and grey markets, barter and gift

Page 8: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Nested Systems and Meta-systems

Russian Dolls:Shells are systemsSpaces are meta-systems

Page 9: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Meta-system Characteristics+ Positive Feedback +

- Positive Feedback -

SYSTEM

Negative feedback loop

Singularity >

Folds continuity and discontinuity(Rene Thom Catastrophe Theory)

Page 10: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Meta-System Partitions

System

Anti-System

Origin Sink

Source

BoundaryHorizon

ARENA

Page 11: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Perceptual / Conceptual

• Gestalt– System

• Flow – Process

• Proto-gestalt– Meta-system

• Proto-flow– Meta-process

Page 12: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Open-Scape

HORIZON

G

G

G

G

No movementOne point of view

PG

PG=Proto-gestaltG= Gestalt

Page 13: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Gestalt vs Flow

Referencein background

FlowingIn Foreground

Background

foreground

Page 14: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Proto-gestalt / Proto-flow

G

G

G

G

PGF

F

FF

Streams in a River

Static-dynamic Dynamic-Static

view view

viewview

PF=Proto-flowF= Flow

PF

Bank

Bank

Reference Line

Page 15: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Emergence and Complexity are Orthogonal

• It is possible to have both simplicity and Emergence, such as in atoms

• It is possible to have both complexity and de-emergence which some call complications.

• We normally see dynamic complexity leading to emergent effects but this is not an intrinsic relation between the two properties

Page 16: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Complex systems do not capture the concept of the meta-system

Systems Theory

Complex Systems

Complex Adaptive Systems

Chaotic Systems

Meta-systems Theory

Complex Meta-systems

Complex Adaptive Meta-systems

Chaotic Meta-systems

Page 17: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Emergence and Schemas are Orthogonal

• Any Schema (System or Meta-system) can either be seen as emergent or de-emergent

• De-emergence or Emergence can be upward or downward in the self-nesting of a single schema

• The transition to another schema from a particular schema can either be emergent or supervenient

• Supervenience means homeomorphic without new emergent properties appearing

• Sub-venience is mapping in the opposite direction, down instead of up

Page 18: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Em

erge

nce

De-

Em

erge

nce

Complexity

Simplification

Schem

a

Met

a-sc

hem

a

Super

-Sch

ema

Sub-s

chem

a

Reduction

Complication

Sup

erve

nien

ce

Sub

veni

ence

Nestin

g of S

chem

as

Transi

tion b

etwee

n Sch

emas

Homeomorphism

Essential Difference as Novelty

Set to Mass TransitionSet to Set or Mass to MassTransition

STARTSTART

Pick:Position in Hierarchy of Schemas

Complexity/Complication ratioSameness/Difference ratio

Page 19: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Exploring the Design Landscape

Nestin

g of S

chem

asTra

nsitio

n bet

wee

n Sch

emas

Ho

meo

mo

rph

ism

Ess

enti

al D

iffe

ren

ce

Set to Mass TransitionSet to Set or Mass to Mass InitialInitial DesignDesign

FinalFinalDesignDesign

AlternativeAlternativeDesignDesign

AlternativeAlternativeDesignDesign

Page 20: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

SE should be grounded on Systems Theory

Systems Engineering Discipline

Systems Theory

Page 21: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Complementary Disciplines

Systems Engineering

Discipline

Systems Theory

Meta-systems Engineering

Discipline

Meta-systems Theory

Emergent Engineering

Page 22: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Emergent Engineering

EXCESS

LACK

Produces

Emergence

or

De-emergence

Regardless of Schema

Page 23: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

System/Meta-system vs Emergence/De-emergence

Emergent System

Emergent Meta-SystemDe-emergent System

De-emergent Meta-systemMove to the outer environment

Move to the inner environment An environment with emergent properties of its own without

becoming a system

Next higher or lower level of system

Page 24: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Hierarchy of Schemas

PluriverseKosmos

WorldDomain

Meta-systemReflexive social

Autopoietic SymbioticDissipative Ordering

SystemForm

PatternMonad

Facet

Emergent Engineering deals with all the schematic levels within reach of experience

ExperientialScaffolding

Page 25: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Schemas and Dimensions

Pluriverse 8 to 9 Kosmos 7 to 8 World 6 to 7

Domain 5 to 6Meta-system 4 to 5

System 3 to 4 Form 2 to 3

Pattern 1 to 2 Monad 0 to 1

Facet -1 to 0

General Rule: Two dimensions per Schema and Two Schemas per dimension

String Theory 10 -- 11Heterochronic 12 --14

Max area

Max volume

Hyper-sphere volumesand areas

infinity

Page 26: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Holonomic Systems

Meta-system = Whole less than the sum of its parts

Reflexive

Autopoietic

Dissipative

System = Whole greater than sum of is parts

Special System = Whole exactly equal to sum of parts

Page 27: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Emergent Meta-system

Sed

enio

n A

lgeb

raZ

ero

Div

isor

s

Oct

onio

n A

lgeb

ra

Qua

tern

ion

Alg

ebra

Com

plex

A

lgeb

ra

Rea

l A

lgeb

ra

<<lost conjugate

<< lost commutative<< lost associative

<< lost division

Lower Energy

Page 28: Meta-Systems, Complexity, and Emergence Kent D. Palmer CSER 2008 080404 kent@palmer.name

Meta-system PrimerEnd

Kent D. Palmer

[email protected]

http://archonic.net

http://holonomic.net