meta of aristotle
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
1/143
Home
Browse and
Comment
Search
Buy Books and
CD-ROMs
Help
Metaphysics
By AristotleCommentary: Many comments have been posted about Metaphysics.
Download: A text-only version isavailable for download.
Metaphysics
By Aristotle
Written 350 B.C.E
Translated by W. D. Ross
Table of Contents
Book VI
Part 1
"
"WE are seeking the principles and the causes of the things that are, and obviously of them qua being. For, while
there is a cause of health and of good condition, and the objects of mathematics have first principles and elementsand causes, and in general every science which is ratiocinative or at all involves reasoning deals with causes and
principles, more or less precise, all these sciences mark off some particular being-some genus, and inquire into
this, but not into being simply nor qua being, nor do they offer any discussion of the essence of the things of
which they treat; but starting from the essence-some making it plain to the senses, others assuming it as ahypothesis-they then demonstrate, more or less cogently, the essential attributes of the genus with which they
deal. It is obvious, therefore, that such an induction yields no demonstration of substance or of the essence, but
some other way of exhibiting it. And similarly the sciences omit the question whether the genus with which theydeal exists or does not exist, because it belongs to the same kind of thinking to show what it is and that it is.
"And since natural science, like other sciences, is in fact about one class of being, i.e. to that sort of substancewhich has the principle of its movement and rest present in itself, evidently it is neither practical nor productive.
For in the case of things made the principle is in the maker-it is either reason or art or some faculty, while in the
case of things done it is in the doer-viz. will, for that which is done and that which is willed are the same.
Therefore, if all thought is either practical or productive or theoretical, physics must be a theoretical science, butit will theorize about such being as admits of being moved, and about substance-as-defined for the most part only
as not separable from matter. Now, we must not fail to notice the mode of being of the essence and of its
definition, for, without this, inquiry is but idle. Of things defined, i.e. of 'whats', some are like 'snub', and some
like 'concave'. And these differ because 'snub' is bound up with matter (for what is snub is a concave nose), whileconcavity is independent of perceptible matter. If then all natural things are a analogous to the snub in their
nature; e.g. nose, eye, face, flesh, bone, and, in general, animal; leaf, root, bark, and, in general, plant (for none ofthese can be defined without reference to movement-they always have matter), it is clear how we must seek and
define the 'what' in the case of natural objects, and also that it belongs to the student of nature to study even soul
in a certain sense, i.e. so much of it as is not independent of matter.
"That physics, then, is a theoretical science, is plain from these considerations. Mathematics also, however, is
theoretical; but whether its objects are immovable and separable from matter, is not at present clear; still, it is
clear that some mathematical theorems consider them qua immovable and qua separable from matter. But if thereis something which is eternal and immovable and separable, clearly the knowledge of it belongs to a theoretical
science,-not, however, to physics (for physics deals with certain movable things) nor to mathematics, but to ascience prior to both. For physics deals with things which exist separately but are not immovable, and some partsof mathematics deal with things which are immovable but presumably do not exist separately, but as embodied in
matter; while the first science deals with things which both exist separately and are immovable. Now all causes
http://classics.mit.edu/index.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Search/index.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/general.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.mb.txthttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.mb.txthttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/index.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Search/index.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/general.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.mb.txthttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/index.html -
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
2/143
must be eternal, but especially these; for they are the causes that operate on so much of the divine as appears tous. There must, then, be three theoretical philosophies, mathematics, physics, and what we may call theology,
since it is obvious that if the divine is present anywhere, it is present in things of this sort. And the highest
science must deal with the highest genus. Thus, while the theoretical sciences are more to be desired than theother sciences, this is more to be desired than the other theoretical sciences. For one might raise the question
whether first philosophy is universal, or deals with one genus, i.e. some one kind of being; for not even the
mathematical sciences are all alike in this respect,-geometry and astronomy deal with a certain particular kind ofthing, while universal mathematics applies alike to all. We answer that if there is no substance other than those
which are formed by nature, natural science will be the first science; but if there is an immovable substance, thescience of this must be prior and must be first philosophy, and universal in this way, because it is first. And it
will belong to this to consider being qua being-both what it is and the attributes which belong to it qua being.
Part 2 "
"But since the unqualified term 'being' has several meanings, of which one was seen' to be the accidental, andanother the true ('non-being' being the false), while besides these there are the figures of predication (e.g. the
'what', quality, quantity, place, time, and any similar meanings which 'being' may have), and again besides all
these there is that which 'is' potentially or actually:-since 'being' has many meanings, we must say regarding theaccidental, that there can be no scientific treatment of it. This is confirmed by the fact that no science practical,
productive, or theoretical troubles itself about it. For on the one hand he who produces a house does not produce
all the attributes that come into being along with the house; for these are innumerable; the house that has been
made may quite well be pleasant for some people, hurtful for some, and useful to others, and different-to put itshortly from all things that are; and the science of building does not aim at producing any of these attributes. And
in the same way the geometer does not consider the attributes which attach thus to figures, nor whether 'triangle'
is different from 'triangle whose angles are equal to two right angles'.-And this happens naturally enough; for theaccidental is practically a mere name. And so Plato was in a sense not wrong in ranking sophistic as dealing with
that which is not. For the arguments of the sophists deal, we may say, above all with the accidental; e.g. the
question whether 'musical' and 'lettered' are different or the same, and whether 'musical Coriscus' and 'Coriscus'
are the same, and whether 'everything which is, but is not eternal, has come to be', with the paradoxicalconclusion that if one who was musical has come to be lettered, he must also have been lettered and have come
to be musical, and all the other arguments of this sort; the accidental is obviously akin to non-being. And this is
clear also from arguments such as the following: things which are in another sense come into being and pass outof being by a process, but things which are accidentally do not. But still we must, as far as we can, say further,
regarding the accidental, what its nature is and from what cause it proceeds; for it will perhaps at the same time
become clear why there is no science of it.
"Since, among things which are, some are always in the same state and are of necessity (not necessity in the
sense of compulsion but that which we assert of things because they cannot be otherwise), and some are not ofnecessity nor always, but for the most part, this is the principle and this the cause of the existence of the
accidental; for that which is neither always nor for the most part, we call accidental. For instance, if in the dog-days there is wintry and cold weather, we say this is an accident, but not if there is sultry heat, because the latteris always or for the most part so, but not the former. And it is an accident that a man is pale (for this is neither
always nor for the most part so), but it is not by accident that he is an animal. And that the builder produces
health is an accident, because it is the nature not of the builder but of the doctor to do this,-but the builder
happened to be a doctor. Again, a confectioner, aiming at giving pleasure, may make something wholesome, butnot in virtue of the confectioner's art; and therefore we say 'it was an accident', and while there is a sense in
which he makes it, in the unqualified sense he does not. For to other things answer faculties productive of them,
but to accidental results there corresponds no determinate art nor faculty; for of things which are or come to beby accident, the cause also is accidental. Therefore, since not all things either are or come to be of necessity and
always, but, the majority of things are for the most part, the accidental must exist; for instance a pale man is not
always nor for the most part musical, but since this sometimes happens, it must be accidental (if not, everythingwill be of necessity). The matter, therefore, which is capable of being otherwise than as it usually is, must be the
cause of the accidental. And we must take as our starting-point the question whether there is nothing that is
neither always nor for the most part. Surely this is impossible. There is, then, besides these something which is
fortuitous and accidental. But while the usual exists, can nothing be said to be always, or are there eternal things?This must be considered later,' but that there is no science of the accidental is obvious; for all science is either of
that which is always or of that which is for the most part. (For how else is one to learn or to teach another? The
thing must be determined as occurring either always or for the most part, e.g. that honey-water is useful for apatient in a fever is true for the most part.) But that which is contrary to the usual law science will be unable to
state, i.e. when the thing does not happen, e.g.'on the day of new moon'; for even that which happens on the day
of new moon happens then either always or for the most part; but the accidental is contrary to such laws. Wehave stated, then, what the accidental is, and from what cause it arises, and that there is no science which deals
with it.
Part 3 "
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
3/143
"That there are principles and causes which are generable and destructible without ever being in course of being
generated or destroyed, is obvious. For otherwise all things will be of necessity, since that which is beinggenerated or destroyed must have a cause which is not accidentally its cause. Will A exist or not? It will if B
happens; and if not, not. And B will exist if C happens. And thus if time is constantly subtracted from a limited
extent of time, one will obviously come to the present. This man, then, will die by violence, if he goes out; andhe will do this if he gets thirsty; and he will get thirsty if something else happens; and thus we shall come to that
which is now present, or to some past event. For instance, he will go out if he gets thirsty; and he will get thirstyif he is eating pungent food; and this is either the case or not; so that he will of necessity die, or of necessity not
die. And similarly if one jumps over to past events, the same account will hold good; for this-I mean the pastcondition-is already present in something. Everything, therefore, that will be, will be of necessity; e.g. it is
necessary that he who lives shall one day die; for already some condition has come into existence, e.g. the
presence of contraries in the same body. But whether he is to die by disease or by violence is not yet determined,but depends on the happening of something else. Clearly then the process goes back to a certain starting-point,
but this no longer points to something further. This then will be the starting-point for the fortuitous, and will have
nothing else as cause of its coming to be. But to what sort of starting-point and what sort of cause we thus referthe fortuitous-whether to matter or to the purpose or to the motive power, must be carefully considered.
Part 4 "
"Let us dismiss accidental being; for we have sufficiently determined its nature. But since that which is in thesense of being true, or is not in the sense of being false, depends on combination and separation, and truth and
falsity together depend on the allocation of a pair of contradictory judgements (for the true judgement affirms
where the subject and predicate really are combined, and denies where they are separated, while the falsejudgement has the opposite of this allocation; it is another question, how it happens that we think things together
or apart; by 'together' and 'apart' I mean thinking them so that there is no succession in the thoughts but they
become a unity); for falsity and truth are not in things-it is not as if the good were true, and the bad were in itself
false-but in thought; while with regard to simple concepts and 'whats' falsity and truth do not exist even inthought--this being so, we must consider later what has to be discussed with regard to that which is or is not in
this sense. But since the combination and the separation are in thought and not in the things, and that which is in
this sense is a different sort of 'being' from the things that are in the full sense (for the thought attaches orremoves either the subject's 'what' or its having a certain quality or quantity or something else), that which is
accidentally and that which is in the sense of being true must be dismissed. For the cause of the former is
indeterminate, and that of the latter is some affection of the thought, and both are related to the remaining genusof being, and do not indicate the existence of any separate class of being. Therefore let these be dismissed, and
let us consider the causes and the principles of being itself, qua being. (It was clear in our discussion of the
various meanings of terms, that 'being' has several meanings.)
Digg
aceb
ook
Twitt
er
Wind
ows
Live
Favor
ites
Yaho
o
Book
arks
ySp
ace
Home
Brows
e andComm
ent
Search
http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://classics.mit.edu/index.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Search/index.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/index.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index-Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Search/index.htmlhttp://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/ -
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
4/143
Buy
Books
and
CD-
ROMs
Help
owe
ed
yddT
oAny
H
Bi
W
Bl
E
Li
Jo
C
B
T
M
L
E
A
A
http://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/general.htmlhttp://www.addtoany.com/http://www.addtoany.com/http://www.addtoany.com/http://www.addtoany.com/http://www.addtoany.com/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/about/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/works/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/posts/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/events/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/links/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/join/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/contact/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/the-last-superstition-part-ii-ditching-aristotles-metaphysics/#respondhttp://www.uncrediblehallq.net/review-of-edward-fesers-the-last-superstition-part-i-morality/comment-page-1/#comment-4759http://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Buy/Aristotle.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/general.htmlhttp://www.addtoany.com/http://www.addtoany.com/http://www.addtoany.com/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/about/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/about/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/works/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/works/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/posts/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/posts/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/events/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/events/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/links/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/links/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/join/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/join/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/contact/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/contact/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/science/biology/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/reviews/collecting-fleas/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/history/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/philosophy/metaphysics/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/philosophy/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/science/physics/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/religion/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/reviews/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/science/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/author/admin/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/the-last-superstition-part-ii-ditching-aristotles-metaphysics/print/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/the-last-superstition-part-ii-ditching-aristotles-metaphysics/#respondhttp://www.uncrediblehallq.net/the-last-superstition-part-ii-ditching-aristotles-metaphysics/#respondhttp://www.uncrediblehallq.net/review-of-edward-fesers-the-last-superstition-part-i-morality/comment-page-1/#comment-4759http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/review-of-edward-fesers-the-last-superstition-part-i-morality/comment-page-1/#comment-4759 -
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
5/143
A
T
A
w
W
T
T
1)
F
A
T
O
Li
F
if
N
S
In
Fi
http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/review-of-edward-fesers-the-last-superstition-part-i-morality/comment-page-1/#comment-4762http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/science/biology/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/reviews/collecting-fleas/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/history/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/philosophy/metaphysics/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/philosophy/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/science/physics/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/religion/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/reviews/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/category/science/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/the-last-superstition-part-ii-ditching-aristotles-metaphysics/#comments -
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
6/143
6
1.
A
2
.
3.
wa
s
go
i
ng
to
in
it
iall
y
re
s
p
on
d
to
t
he
fi
rst
o
b
ject
i
on
o
fy
o
u
rsr
e
ga
r
di
n
g
Pr
o
f
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
7/143
es
s
or
F
es
er
sp
o
siti
o
no
n
Nat
u
r
alL
a
w,
b
u
tI
fi
gu
r
et
h
atI
m
g
o
in
g
to
s
av
e
th
at
o
bje
ct
io
n
fo
r
la
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
8/143
stsi
n
ce
it
sa
ctu
all
y
ar
at
he
r
sm
al
l
pa
rt
of
h
is
ar
g
um
e
nt
c
om
par
e
d
to
h
isc
e
ntr
al
t
he
si
s(
w
hic
h
yo
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
9/143
try
t
oat
ta
ck
he
re
).
No
te
,t
h
atI
c
a
me
a
cr
o
s
sy
o
ur
b
lo
g
wh
enl
o
o
ki
n
gf
o
rr
e
v
iew
s
of
Th
e
La
st
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
10/143
Su
p
ers
ti
tio
n,
so
p
lea
s
ed
o
nt
c
o
un
t
me
a
s
ast
al
ke
r
4.
no
tice
d
t
hat
y
ou
w
er
e
a
nal
m
ost
fi
nis
h
ed
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
11/143
nd
e
rg
r
ad
in
ph
il
os
o
ph
ic
alst
u
d
ies.
T
his
is
e
xci
ti
ng
f
or
m
et
ose
e
a
sI
m
eet
v
er
y
f
ew
p
eo
p
lei
n
my
m
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
12/143
ajo
r.
It
o
o,
am
ast
u
de
n
to
f
ph
il
o
so
p
hy
a
n
dw
il
lb
e
fin
is
hi
ngs
o
o
n.
5
.o
,
In
s
h
A
ll
ah
(
Go
d
Wil
li
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
13/143
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
14/143
en
ts
an
d
ho
wy
ou
a
ctu
al
ly
r
ea
d
a
nd
i
nte
r
p
ret
e
dF
e
se
r
sw
ork
.
R
ea
s
on
b
ein
g
,
isb
e
ca
u
se
it
do
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
15/143
sn
t
se
e
m
yo
uh
a
ve
a
ctu
al
ly
ta
k
en
t
he
ti
m
et
o
re
a
dt
h
ea
ctual
b
o
ok
it
sel
f
in
d
et
ail
o
ry
o
uh
a
ve
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
16/143
ta
ct
ual
l
yst
ud
ied
m
eta
p
hy
si
cs
o
r
ph
il
os
o
p
he
rs
su
c
ha
s
Ari
stotl
e
o
rA
q
ui
n
as.
I
m
ea
n
no
t
to
b
er
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
17/143
de,
b
ut
it
sj
ust
ve
r
yd
if
fic
u
ltf
o
r
me
t
ota
k
e
ite
a
sy
o
na
n
alm
ostg
r
a
du
at
in
g
ph
il
o
so
p
hy
st
ud
e
nt.
I
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
18/143
m
u
su
al
ly
les
sb
l
un
t
wit
h
no
n
-
ph
il
os
o
p
he
rs
,s
u
ch
a
st
hos
e
w
ho
t
ou
t
sci
e
n
ce
a
ro
u
nd
li
ke
it
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
19/143
st
h
eu
lt
im
ate
wa
y
to
tr
ut
h
an
d
b
elie
v
et
h
at
Ric
h
ar
d
Da
w
ki
nsis
at
t
he
h
eig
h
to
f
p
hil
o
so
p
hic
al
an
d
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
20/143
th
e
ol
o
gic
alt
hi
n
ki
n
g,
b
ut
n
o
ts
o
wit
h
t
ho
s
ew
h
os
h
ou
ldk
n
o
wt
h
eir
st
uff
.
7
.le
a
se
c
orr
e
ctm
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
21/143
ifI
m
w
r
on
g,
of
c
ou
rs
e.L
et
sb
e
g
in
8.
ir
st
yo
u
be
g
in
b
yg
ene
r
al
izi
n
gt
h
eb
a
si
cp
h
ilo
s
op
h
yo
f
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
22/143
Pa
r
me
n
id
es
an
d
yo
u
ba
si
cal
l
y
get
it
rig
h
t
(o
t
he
r
th
a
nt
hei
n
a
cc
u
rat
e
lan
g
u
ag
e
),h
o
we
v
er,
y
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
23/143
ou
r
ew
r
on
gt
oa
s
su
m
et
h
atF
e
s
er
w
as
s
et
tin
g
up
Ari
st
otl
eas
a
r
es
p
on
s
et
o
P
ar
m
en
i
de
s.
Fe
s
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
24/143
er
d
oe
s
nt
do
th
is
atal
l
an
d
itis
c
o
mm
o
nk
n
o
wle
d
ge
a
mo
n
gi
ntro
d
u
cto
r
yp
h
ilo
s
o
ph
y
stu
d
en
ts
th
at
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
25/143
Ari
st
otl
e
wa
sr
es
p
on
d
in
g
to
h
is
tea
c
he
r,
P
lat
o
,n
o
tP
a
rm
eni
d
e
s.P
a
rm
e
ni
d
e
sis
u
se
d
as
a
tea
c
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
26/143
hi
n
gt
o
ol
fo
rt
h
os
e
to
u
nd
e
rs
tan
d
Ari
st
o
tle
(
no
te
pa
g
e5
2)a
s
d
isa
g
re
ei
ng
w
it
hP
a
rm
e
ni
d
es
c
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
27/143
on
cl
usi
o
n,
bu
tn
o
th
is
ov
e
ral
l
a
rg
u
me
n
t.
Of
c
ou
rs
e,t
h
iss
etsu
p
A
rtis
t
otl
e
se
x
p
lan
at
io
n
of
h
ow
c
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
28/143
ha
n
ge
a
nd
pe
rm
a
ne
n
ce
c
an
h
a
pp
e
nat
t
h
es
a
me
ti
me;
p
ote
ntial
s
a
nd
a
ctu
al
s.9
.
o
rry
t
ob
e
nit
p
ick
y
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
29/143
.T
h
ats
w
hat
we
ph
il
os
o
ph
e
rsd
o
,
ho
w
ev
e
r,
rig
h
t?1
0
.o
w
,t
hen
e
x
tc
ri
tiq
u
es
a
r
ew
h
er
e
yo
u
get
a
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
30/143
litt
le
mo
r
ete
ch
nic
al
(w
h
ile
st
ill
a
v
oi
d
in
g
t
he
n
ec
e
ss
a
ry
lang
u
a
ge
o
ft
h
ea
r
g
um
e
nt)
,
bu
t
It
h
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
31/143
in
k
yo
u
act
ual
ly
m
isi
n
ter
p
ret
w
h
atA
ri
sto
tl
e,
Aq
u
in
a
s,a
n
dF
ese
r
a
re
tr
yi
n
gt
o
s
ay
.
As
a
sid
e
no
te
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
32/143
,I
al
so
d
on
ts
ee
w
hy
y
ou
k
ee
p
m
en
ti
on
i
n
gA
ri
sto
tl
ea
s
th
epri
m
a
ry
v
oic
e
be
h
i
nd
t
he
a
rg
u
me
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
33/143
tsei
t
he
r.
He
wa
ssi
m
pl
y
th
e
fo
u
n
dat
i
on
.
F
es
e
ris
a
Th
o
mis
tin
r
e
ga
r
ds
t
ot
h
e
ex
is
ten
c
eo
f
Go
d
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
34/143
an
d
mo
r
alit
y,
on
e
wh
o
fo
ll
ow
s
T
ho
m
as
A
q
ui
n
as.
T
ho
m
as
Aqu
i
n
as
w
ou
l
dc
e
rt
ain
l
yb
e
co
n
sid
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
35/143
re
d
an
i
nh
eri
to
r
of
A
rist
o
tle,
b
u
tn
o
te
x
a
ctl
y
lik
e
hi
m
.1
1.u
t
I
di
g
re
s
s
1
2
.o
u
bei
n
gt
o
me
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
36/143
tio
n
th
e
Fe
se
rs
a
rg
u
me
n
to
f
c
ha
n
ge
i
n
or
d
er
e
ds
e
rie
sof
c
a
us
e
s(t
h
es
e
c
on
d
bei
n
gm
e
nti
o
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
37/143
ne
d
as
a
ne
ss
en
ti
als
e
rie
s,
no
t
a
na
c
cid
e
n
tal)
a
sb
ei
ng
fal
lacio
u
s
,w
it
ho
u
ta
ct
u
all
y
tell
i
ng
u
sw
h
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
38/143
att
h
ef
al
lac
yis
,m
u
ch
le
ss
h
ow
t
h
ea
n
alo
g
y
fits
w
ith
t
he
cl
aim
atal
l.
L
ast
ti
me
I
ch
e
c
ke
d
,t
h
eE
a
rth
d
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
39/143
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
40/143
ss
a
ry
f
un
cti
on
s
of
a
ctu
al
sa
n
d
po
te
nti
al
s.
13
.
tal
l
act
u
all
yma
k
e
sq
u
ite
a
bit
o
f
se
n
se
o
nc
e
yo
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
41/143
vie
w
th
is
wa
y.
As
p
er
e
xa
m
ple
o
f
th
e
trai
n
c
ars
i
nh
is
bo
o
k,
whe
r
e
th
e
ca
b
oo
s
e
isb
ei
ng
p
ull
e
db
y
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
42/143
Xc
a
r,w
h
ich
isb
ein
g
pu
ll
ed
b
yY
c
a
r,et
c.
Bu
t
t
oe
x
pla
i
nt
h
em
otio
n
(
ch
a
ng
e
)o
f
e
ac
h
ca
r
sim
u
lta
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
43/143
eo
u
sly
,
yo
uc
an
n
ot
si
mp
l
yk
e
e
pa
d
di
n
g
ca
rs
.T
h
er
e
ha
sto
b
e
so
m
eth
i
ng
t
h
atis
m
ov
i
ng
t
he
m
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
44/143
.T
o
ha
v
ea
ni
nfi
n
ite
s
eri
e
so
f
m
ov
i
ng
v
e
hic
le
sd
o
es
n
ot
exp
la
i
nt
h
em
o
tio
n
it
sel
f.
Es
s
en
ti
alS
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
45/143
rie
s
ex
p
lai
nW
HY
t
hi
n
gs
R
EM
A
I
Ne
x
isti
n
g
,r
at
he
r
th
a
nh
owt
h
e
yc
a
me
i
nt
o
e
xis
te
nc
e.
In
o
rd
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
46/143
rf
o
rt
h
in
gs
to
r
em
ai
na
s
su
c
h
,t
h
er
e
m
ust
h
av
e
alw
a
ys
bee
n
s
om
et
hi
n
ge
x
is
tin
g
to
b
eg
i
nw
it
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
47/143
h,
a
se
x
iste
nc
ed
o
es
n
ot
c
om
e
fr
om
no
n
-
ex
is
ten
c
e(
B
ein
gfro
m
No
n
-B
ei
ng
,
a
sP
a
rm
e
ni
d
es
w
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
48/143
ou
l
ds
a
y).
In
ot
h
er
w
or
d
s,t
h
e
re
c
an
n
o
tb
e
an
i
nfi
n
ite
seri
e
s
of
t
hi
n
gs
(
e
ve
n
ac
ci
de
n
tals
)
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
49/143
be
c
au
s
et
hat
as
s
um
e
st
h
er
e
a
re
a
ni
n
fi
nit
e
se
ri
es
o
fp
oten
ti
al
s,w
h
ich
c
an
o
n
ly
e
xis
t
ift
h
er
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
50/143
isa
n
act
u
alt
oc
ha
n
ge
fr
om
.
Bu
t
t
he
r
ec
a
n
no
t
be
a
ni
n
fin
ites
e
ri
es
o
fc
h
an
g
e
s(
p
ote
n
tial
s
>a
ct
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
51/143
ual
s
>p
o
ten
tial
s>
a
ctu
al
etc.
)
be
c
a
us
e
ch
a
n
ge
(
aP
o
ten
ti
alt
oan
A
ct
ual
)
re
q
uir
e
s
af
o
un
d
ati
o
no
f
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
52/143
its
o
wn
(
no
tet
he
tr
ain
c
ar
a
nal
o
g
y).
R
em
e
m
be
r,
ap
o
ten
ti
alc
ann
o
t
ex
is
tb
y
its
el
f.
14
.
ot
h
er
e
mu
st
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
53/143
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
54/143
ste
x
ist
b
ef
or
ea
n
yt
h
in
g
ca
n
h
ap
p
en
;
s
om
et
hi
n
gt
h
atc
ann
o
t
be
a
cte
d
up
o
n
(si
n
ce
t
he
n
itw
o
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
55/143
ul
d
no
t
be
so
met
h
in
g
pri
m
ar
y
,
bu
t
se
c
o
nd
a
ry
a
nd
la
ck
allt
h
e
ne
c
es
s
ar
y
f
eat
u
re
s
of
p
ur
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
56/143
bei
n
g[i
.e
.p
erf
ect
i
on
])
.N
o
tet
h
at
th
is
atta
c
k
sa
n
ot
h
er
c
riti
cism
o
fy
o
urs
th
e
t
hi
n
gt
h
atm
u
stb
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
57/143
th
e
Pri
m
eA
ctu
alit
y
,h
a
st
o
ha
v
e
all
t
he
n
e
ce
s
sa
r
yf
e
atu
res
(
b
ein
g
th
at
itm
u
st
be
A
LL
fo
r
ifit
la
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
58/143
ck
s
so
m
eth
in
gt
h
en
it
isn
o
tt
h
e
all-
e
nc
o
m
pa
s
sin
g
act
u
alit
y).1
5
.
his
al
so
st
rik
e
s
do
w
ny
o
ur
a
ss
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
59/143
mp
ti
on
t
hat
Fe
se
r
do
e
sn
t
gi
v
e
an
e
xp
la
n
ati
o
na
s
to
h
ow
the
P
ri
me
B
ein
g
(G
o
d
)c
a
nn
o
tb
e
ch
a
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
60/143
ng
e
d,
o
ri
mm
uta
b
lea
s
we
li
ke
t
o
sa
y
.O
f
c
ou
rs
eh
e
gi
v
es
are
a
s
on
.
He
s
be
e
n
gi
v
in
g
ar
e
as
o
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
61/143
nsi
n
ce
c
ha
pte
r2
.
Ij
u
ste
x
pla
i
n
ed
it
in
c
a
se
y
ou
d
on
t
wa
ntt
o
g
ob
a
ck
a
nd
a
ct
ual
l
yr
e
ad
t
he
b
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
62/143
oo
k
.If
t
he
Pri
me
B
ein
g
ist
o
be
c
h
an
g
ed
t
h
en
it
mu
st
be
c
ha
nge
d
b
ys
o
met
h
in
g
o
uts
i
de
o
fit
s
elf,
w
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
63/143
hic
h
th
e
nm
ea
ns
it
isn
t
th
e
Pri
m
e
Bei
n
g.
It
s
sel
f
ex
p
lan
at
or
y.A
n
d
we
ve
al
re
a
d
ym
e
nti
o
ne
d
th
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
64/143
in
a
de
q
ua
cy
of
a
ni
n
fin
it
er
e
g
re
s
sb
o
t
hi
n
co
n
tex
t
of
Acci
d
e
nta
l
Or
d
er
e
d
Se
ri
es
a
nd
E
ss
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
65/143
nti
al
Or
d
er
ed
Se
ri
es,
s
oI
d
on
t
s
ee
w
hy
w
e
ne
e
dt
o
get
b
ac
kin
t
o
th
at
.1
6
.le
a
s
ea
s
ka
n
yq
u
est
i
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
66/143
on
s
ifI
s
ou
nd
in
c
oh
e
re
n
tt
o
y
ou
,
th
o
u
gh
I
ha
r
dl
y
bel
ieve
t
h
isis
d
iffi
c
ult
t
o
un
d
ers
ta
nd
.
17
.
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
67/143
ou
g
oo
n
to
me
nti
o
no
n
eo
f
Fe
s
e
rs
r
eb
u
tt
als
t
ot
h
eN
e
wt
onia
n
p
rin
ci
ple
o
fi
n
e
rtia
,
bu
t
on
l
yO
N
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
68/143
Eo
f
th
e
m,
as
th
o
ug
h
th
at
st
h
e
en
ti
re
s
h
ab
a
ng
.
Yo
u
re
spo
n
d
to
t
he
nat
u
r
eo
f
th
e
th
i
ng
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
69/143
ar
g
um
e
nt,
bu
ty
o
uf
o
rg
et
th
at
t
his
d
oe
s
n
ta
ff
ect
t
he
P
rim
ary
A
ct
ual
/
Fir
st
Ca
u
s
ea
r
gu
m
en
t,
as
it
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
70/143
sim
p
ly
r
ais
es
th
e
qu
e
sti
o
na
s
t
ow
h
ys
u
c
ha
t
hi
n
gh
a
st
hatn
at
u
re
at
all
(
an
d
le
ad
s
us
b
ac
k
to
t
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
71/143
he
o
bv
i
ou
sa
ns
w
er
o
fG
o
d).
I
w
ou
l
dh
o
p
ey
o
u
d
als
o
lik
eto
e
x
pla
i
nt
h
eo
t
h
er
2
ex
p
lan
at
io
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
72/143
sb
y
Fe
s
er
(p
g.
1
02
),
ify
o
uw
is
h
to
b
eh
o
n
est
t
oy
o
ur
r
ea
ders
.
1
8.
o
in
g
ba
c
k
to
a
pr
e
vi
o
us
p
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
73/143
oi
n
t,I
d
als
oli
ke
t
oa
s
kh
o
wy
o
u
bel
ie
ve
a
b
ein
g
wit
h
all
f
eat
ure
s
is
so
m
eh
o
wi
n
c
oh
e
re
n
t?
S
tri
k
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
74/143
es
m
ea
s
od
dt
os
a
yif
y
ou
a
ctu
al
l
yu
n
de
rs
ta
nd
t
he
A
rist
o
teli
an/
T
h
om
is
te
x
pla
n
at
io
n
.1
9
.o
v
in
g
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
75/143
on
t
oy
o
ur
cri
tiq
u
eo
f
th
e
4c
a
u
se
s
I
fi
n
dt
h
isr
at
he
r
an
emb
a
rr
as
s
me
n
to
n
y
ou
r
pa
rt
.N
o
to
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
76/143
ly
d
oy
o
un
ot
cri
ti
qu
e
th
e
fo
u
r
ca
u
se
s,
b
ut
y
ou
s
ee
m
to
plac
e
t
he
m
all
i
nt
h
e
sa
m
eb
o
atb
y
clai
m
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
77/143
in
g
th
at
Fe
se
ris
o
nl
y
clai
m
in
g
t
hat
c
au
s
e
iso
f
its
Fi
n
al
for
m
(
pu
r
po
s
e).
T
h
er
e
ar
e
ob
v
io
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
78/143
sly
o
th
e
rc
au
se
s
in
p
lay
(t
he
fi
rs
tt
h
re
e
c
om
e
to
m
in
d
).A
gain
,
t
he
e
xis
te
nc
e
o
fp
o
ten
ti
als
c
an
o
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
79/143
nl
y
be
s
ob
as
ed
o
na
f
ou
n
dat
i
o
n,
t
hu
s
t
he
n
ee
d
fo
r
as
upe
r-
i
nte
ll
ect
(j
ust
a
s
th
e
an
al
og
y
of
t
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
80/143
he
p
ain
ti
ng
an
dt
h
ep
ai
nte
r
ex
p
la
in
s)
.T
h
e
po
te
nti
al
sa
r
eh
idd
e
n
wit
h
in
t
he
u
lt
im
at
ea
ct
ual
,
wh
ic
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
81/143
he
n
co
m
pa
ss
es
al
le
x
iste
n
ce.
T
a
ke
t
his
f
o
ra
n
ex
a
mp
le
.S
ayt
h
at
th
e
Pri
m
eA
ct
u
alit
y
isa
tr
ee.
F
ro
m
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
82/143
th
at
tre
e
ar
es
ev
e
ral
p
ote
n
tial
s,
s
uc
h
as
t
h
eu
s
eo
f
ho
u
sin
gby
i
n
se
ct
so
r
sm
al
l
bir
d
s,p
a
pe
r,
etc.
N
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
83/143
ow
,
ift
h
etr
ee
isal
l
th
at
ex
is
ts(
b
ei
ng
e
xis
te
n
ce
it
sel
f)
,t
h
en
eve
r
y
th
i
ng
t
hat
t
h
attr
e
eC
O
UL
D
be
(i
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
84/143
na
le
ss
e
rs
en
se,
n
ot
g
re
at
er)
is
p
ote
n
tial
iz
e
di
n
its
f
or
m
.T
her
e
f
or
e,
ev
e
ry
t
h
in
g
th
at
co
m
es
fr
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
85/143
om
t
hat
tr
ee,
its
po
te
nti
al
mu
st
ex
is
t
be
f
or
e
it
isa
ct
ual
iz
ed
a
sT
HAT
p
a
rtic
u
lar
t
hi
n
g
.It
s
ex
is
ten
c
e,h
o
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
86/143
we
v
er,
is
alr
ea
dy
e
sta
b
lis
h
ed
i
n
th
e
Pri
m
e
Act
u
alit
y
.2
0
.r
oba
b
l
ya
b
ette
r
ex
a
m
ple
is
th
is
.A
p
iec
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
87/143
of
p
ieis
a
pie
in
wh
o
le,
b
ut
y
ou
ta
k
ea
p
iec
e
o
ft
h
ep
ie
aw
a
y,
and
y
o
ug
et
ap
ie
ce
o
f
ap
ie
.T
h
ep
ie
its
el
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
88/143
fis
n
ot
a
pie
ce,
bu
t
ith
a
st
h
ep
o
te
nti
al
of
p
ie
ce
s
in
it
.It
is
no
tma
d
e
up
o
fp
ie
ce
s,
b
ut
t
he
p
ote
n
tial
f
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
89/143
or
p
iec
e
sa
re
th
e
re.
2
1.
a
lso
d
o
nt
s
ee
h
o
wF
e
se
r
d
e
fe
nds
A
rist
o
tle
fr
om
D
ar
w
in
.
Da
r
wi
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
90/143
do
e
sn
t
aff
ect
Ari
st
otl
e
or
A
qu
i
n
as,
b
ec
a
u
se
n
eit
h
er
o
ft
hem
a
r
ea
r
gu
i
ng
b
a
se
d
on
p
ro
b
ab
il
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
91/143
itie
s
or
t
he
lac
ko
f
Fi
n
alC
a
us
al
it
y.
F
es
e
r
ma
k
es
t
his
p
oi
ntcl
e
a
ri
n
on
e
sp
o
t
(p
g
.1
1
3)
a
nd
i
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
92/143
no
t
he
r
pla
ce
sa
s
wel
l.
22
.
es
e
r
wo
u
ld
n
o
th
a
ve
u
sb
el
iev
eth
at
a
f
u
tu
r
e
tr
e
ec
a
us
e
sa
p
re
v
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
93/143
io
u
str
e
et
oe
xis
t.
He
w
ou
l
dn
e
v
er
a
rg
u
e
th
at
af
u
tu
r
eli
nki
n
a
nA
c
cid
e
nta
l
O
rd
e
re
d
Se
ri
es
w
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
94/143
ou
l
da
ff
ect
ap
re
v
io
u
sli
n
ki
n
t
he
c
hai
n
.
He
m
er
el
ya
r
gu
edt
h
at
th
e
po
te
nti
al
f
or
X
th
i
ng
al
re
a
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
95/143
dy
e
xis
t
wit
hi
nt
h
eP
ri
me
A
ctu
al
/
Fir
st
Ca
u
s
e.2
3
.
m
su
r
ey
ou
v
e
be
e
nta
u
gh
t
a
bo
u
tS
tr
aw
m
en
i
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
96/143
ni
n
tro
d
uct
or
yl
o
gic
?
24
.
orr
y
t
ob
e
so
h
a
rsh
,
bu
t
Is
e
rio
usly
c
a
nn
o
tu
n
de
rs
ta
nd
y
ou
r
cri
ti
cis
m
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
97/143
sh
e
re
a
sb
ein
ga
c
cu
r
ate
t
ot
h
e
act
u
alp
ic
t
ur
e
bei
n
gd
r
aw
n.I
m
a
ym
o
ve
o
nt
o
y
ou
r
pr
e
vi
o
us
p
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
98/143
ost
.
25
.
ak
ec
ar
e.2
6.
A
2
7
.2
8
.
ya
p
ol
o
g
ies
f
or
a
ny
t
yp
osa
s
w
ell.
2
9.
C
30
.
3
1.
li
r
e
-r
e
ad
y
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
99/143
ou
r
co
m
me
nt.
At
o
ne
p
oi
n
t,y
o
u
se
e
mt
o
n
oti
c
et
h
ep
r
ob
lem
w
it
hit
,
bu
t
th
e
n
yo
u
qu
ic
kl
y
ba
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
100/143
ish
t
he
t
ho
ug
ht.
3
2.
f
yo
u
ca
n
t
fig
u
re
t
h
iso
u
to
n
yo
u
ro
wn:
y
e
s,y
o
ud
o
so
u
n
di
n
co
h
er
e
nt,
a
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
101/143
nd
y
ou
r
eal
ly
ar
e
th
at
ha
r
dt
o
u
nd
e
rsta
n
d
.Y
o
ut
h
ro
w
ar
oun
d
ja
rg
o
ni
n
dis
c
ri
mi
n
atel
y
,w
it
ho
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
102/143
te
v
er
e
xp
lai
ni
n
gw
h
atit
m
ea
n
s.
Do
y
ou
k
n
ow
w
hat
it
me
a
ns
?De
fi
n
eit
f
or
y
ou
rs
el
f,y
o
um
a
yb
e
su
r
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
103/143
pri
s
ed
at
ho
wh
ar
d
th
is
ist
o
do
.
T
hr
o
wi
n
g
ar
o
un
d
jar
g
on
with
n
o
cle
a
rm
e
an
i
n
gi
n
mi
n
dis
a
tra
p
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
104/143
th
at
se
a
sy
to
fal
l
in
t
oif
y
ou
st
u
dy
p
hil
o
s
op
h
yl
o
ng
e
no
ugh
,
I
ve
f
alle
n
in
t
o
it.
3
3.
o
um
a
yb
el
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
105/143
iev
e
th
at
Fe
se
rd
e
fin
e
se
v
er
y
o
un
c
eo
f
ja
rg
o
np
e
rfe
ct
ly
clea
rl
y
,b
u
tI
c
ou
l
d
nt
fi
nd
a
ny
s
uc
h
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
106/143
cle
a
re
x
pla
nat
io
n
sw
h
ile
r
ea
d
i
ng
h
isb
o
o
k.
T
he
r
ew
a
sa
little
e
v
id
e
nc
e,
fo
r
e
xa
m
ple
,
th
at
p
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
107/143
re
b
ein
g
m
ea
nt
bei
n
gt
h
atc
o
u
ld
n
ot
p
o
ssi
b
ly
n
ot
e
xis
t,b
u
t
th
e
wa
y
Fe
s
e
ra
n
dy
o
uu
s
es
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
108/143
ch
te
rm
s
oft
en
se
e
ms
t
os
u
gg
e
st
itm
u
stm
e
a
nm
o
re
t
ha
n
th
is.W
h
at
do
e
sit
m
ea
n
?
En
li
gh
te
nm
e.
34
.
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
109/143
ou
r
eal
s
ow
ea
ko
n
lo
g
ical
c
on
n
e
cti
o
ns
b
et
we
e
ny
o
ur
i
de
as.Y
o
u
lik
e
th
e
ph
r
a
se
i
no
t
he
r
wo
r
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
110/143
ds,
wh
ic
hn
or
mal
l
yi
n
dic
at
es
t
h
ato
n
est
at
e
me
n
tis
j
ust
a
pa
rap
h
r
as
e
of
t
he
o
t
he
r,
bu
t
yo
u
ne
v
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
111/143
er
e
xp
la
in
ho
wt
h
isis
s
oi
n
th
e
c
as
e
sw
h
e
re
y
ou
u
se
t
he
phr
a
s
e.P
e
rh
a
ps
y
o
ut
h
in
k
th
is
wo
u
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
112/143
ld
b
eo
b
vi
ou
sif
o
nl
y
th
e
jar
g
o
nw
e
re
e
x
pla
i
ne
d
,b
u
th
ave
y
o
utr
ie
de
x
pla
i
n
in
g
th
e
jar
g
on
t
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
113/143
oy
o
urs
el
ft
om
ak
e
su
r
ey
o
uu
n
d
ers
ta
nd
it
?
35
.
in
o
rp
o
in
ts:Y
e
a
h,
I
kn
o
wA
ri
st
otl
e
wa
s
Pla
t
os
st
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
114/143
ud
e
nt
a
nd
all
th
at
.B
u
tit
s
stu
p
i
dt
o
sa
y
t
hat
if
ap
h
ilo
s
op
her
r
e
sp
o
nd
s
to
h
is
im
m
ed
ia
tep
r
ed
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
115/143
ce
s
so
r,
th
en
he
is
nt
r
es
p
on
d
i
ng
t
oa
n
y
ot
h
er
p
hil
o
so
phe
r,
e
ve
r.
Fu
rt
he
r
m
or
e,
Fe
s
er
cl
ea
rl
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
116/143
yd
o
es
u
se
th
eh
is
to
ri
cal
fi
gu
r
e
of
P
ar
m
e
ni
d
es
t
oe
st
ab
lish
,
r
het
o
ric
al
ly
,
t
hat
t
he
r
eis
a
pr
o
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
117/143
ble
m
o
f
ch
an
ge
a
nd
p
er
m
an
e
n
ce,
it
si
n
j
ust
t
hat
s
en
s
et
hatF
e
s
er
u
se
s
Pa
r
m
en
i
de
s
to
s
etu
p
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
118/143
Ari
st
otl
e
(th
ou
gh
m
ay
b
e
a
rg
u
m
en
t
of
P
a
rm
e
ni
d
es
ist
oost
r
o
ng
,
pe
r
ha
p
s
p
r
ob
le
m
p
ro
m
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
119/143
ote
d
by
P
ar
me
nd
ie
s
?
)3
6
.s
f
o
rt
h
es
o
la
rs
y
ste
m
:d
e
ny
ing
t
h
atit
is
no
t
th
e
E
art
h
bu
t
gr
a
vit
y
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
120/143
th
at
ca
u
se
st
he
m
oo
n
to
o
rb
it
is
lik
e
lo
o
k
in
g
ata
b
all
o
na
strin
g
,
an
d
sa
y
in
g
t
hat
it
isn
o
tt
h
est
ri
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
121/143
ng
t
hat
c
au
se
st
h
eb
al
lt
o
go
r
o
un
d
in
ci
r
cle
s
bu
t
ten
si
on
.3
7.
A
38
.
39
.
ow
a
s
th
is
an
a
ctu
al
re
s
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
122/143
po
n
se
t
om
yo
bje
ct
io
n
st
o
yo
u
o
ra
c
all
o
u
to
n
gr
a
mm
a
rc
orre
ct
i
on
,
wh
ic
hI
fi
n
dr
at
he
r
hy
p
oc
ri
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
123/143
tic
al
in
li
gh
to
fy
o
ur
o
wn
st
ate
m
e
nts
i
nt
h
e
in
it
ial
p
ost
.
40
.d
b
e
mo
r
et
h
an
h
a
pp
y
to
e
xp
la
in
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
124/143
pu
r
eb
ei
ng
t
oy
o
uif
y
ou
dli
k
e,
mi
n
us
m
y
ne
e
dt
o
ex
p
lai
nstat
e
m
en
ts
su
c
ha
s
i
no
t
he
r
wo
r
ds
.
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
125/143
Im
s
ur
e
yo
uc
an
b
eg
r
aci
o
us
t
o
me,
b
ein
g
t
hat
y
ou
la
ck
t
he
nee
d
t
of
o
rm
al
ly
a
n
ds
y
ste
m
atic
al
ly
c
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
126/143
on
st
ru
ct
an
yt
hi
n
gy
o
urs
el
fo
r
u
se
p
ro
p
e
rte
r
mi
n
ol
o
gy
.4
1.
C
42
.
43
.
h,
if
y
ou
r
eh
a
pp
y
to
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
127/143
xp
la
in
y
ou
rja
rg
o
n(
n
ot
g
ra
m
m
ar,
n
oi
d
e
aw
h
yy
o
um
e
nti
one
d
g
ra
m
ma
r)
th
e
n
ex
p
lai
n
it,
r
ath
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
128/143
rt
h
an
a
nn
ou
nci
n
gy
o
ur
h
ap
p
i
ne
s
st
o
e
xp
la
in
it
.4
4.
p
45.
4
6
.a
m
cu
rr
en
tl
y
wo
r
ki
n
go
n
ar
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
129/143
vie
w
of
F
es
er
sp
o
lem
ic
an
d
th
a
n
ky
o
uf
o
r
pr
e
se
n
tin
g
yo
urv
ie
w
so
n
th
e
mat
te
r
of
A
rist
o
tle
s
th
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
130/143
or
y
of
ca
us
e.
It
ish
el
pf
u
lt
o
u
nd
e
rsta
n
d
th
at
his
a
cc
o
un
tof
c
au
s
alit
y
is
n
o
tw
it
ho
u
tp
r
ob
le
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
131/143
ms
o
rc
ri
tic
s,a
so
n
em
i
gh
t
be
le
d
to
b
elie
v
e.
47
.
fi
n
dit
f
as
cinat
i
n
gt
h
atA
ri
sto
tl
e
sa
r
gu
m
en
ts
(o
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
132/143
ce
u
se
d
to
p
ro
v
e
h
isP
a
ga
n
G
od
)
wo
r
k
se
q
ual
l
yw
el
lt
op
r
o
ve
th
e
ex
is
te
nc
e
of
A
lla
h
be
f
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
133/143
or
e
be
c
om
in
gk
n
ow
n
in
t
he
W
e
st,
a
nd
fi
n
all
y
(!)
t
he
C
ath
olic
G
o
do
f
Aq
u
in
a
s.
Its
e
em
s
th
at
ev
e
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
134/143
nif
it
wo
r
ks
as
ad
v
ert
is
ed
,
wh
at
it
pr
o
ve
s
is
so
a
mo
r
ph
o
us
and
o
b
sc
u
re
it
isir
r
el
ev
e
nt
t
ot
h
eb
el
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
135/143
iefs
o
fo
r
di
na
ry
t
hei
st
so
n
eis
li
k
ely
t
oe
n
c
ou
n
ter.
4
8.
t
se
ems
t
h
atli
k
em
o
sts
y
ll
og
is
tic
a
rg
u
me
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
136/143
ts,
it
sc
o
ncl
usi
on
is
hi
d
de
n
in
t
h
ep
r
em
is
e
s
i.
e.is
n
tt
h
en
otio
n
o
fF
i
nal
C
au
s
al
ity
s
mu
g
gli
n
gi
n
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
137/143
th
e
id
e
ao
fa
bei
n
g(
c
alle
d
Go
d
i
nt
h
ec
o
n
clu
si
on
)
wh
o
se
pur
p
o
se
is
bei
n
gs
e
r
ve
d
?
4
9
.B
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
138/143
50.
St
5
1
.
J
54.Y
55.
57.C
58.
59
.
Fro
(Redireced
fromrist
ocracy)
ump
o:navigation,search
1994-
2009
Aris
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aristocracy&redirect=nohttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aristocracy&redirect=nohttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aristocracy&redirect=nohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#column-onehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#column-onehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#column-onehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#searchInputhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#searchInputhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/permissions.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/permissions.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/permissions.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/permissions.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/permissions.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Help/permissions.htmlhttp://www.watersdesigns.com/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/sitemap?PHPSESSID=1c551a882efa07389b8b72a8ca93ab59http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/blog/wp-login.phphttp://www.uncrediblehallq.net/feed/http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/comments/feed/http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate/Now/en?utm_source=enwiki_00&utm_medium=anon_donation_banner&utm_campaign=spontaneous_donationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aristocracy&redirect=nohttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aristocracy&redirect=nohttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aristocracy&redirect=nohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#column-onehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#column-onehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#column-onehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#searchInputhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy#searchInput -
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
139/143
12-
1
3
:
e
x
i
s
t
e
n
c
e
o
f
fo
r
m
s
,
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
r
a
c
tu
a
l
-
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
140/143
Ta
ble
of
Cont
en
ts
Forms ofgovernment
Anarchy
Aristocracy
Authoritarianism
Autocracy
Communist state
Confederation
Corporatocracy
Consociational state
Demarchy Democracy
Direct
Representative
Consensus
Despotism
Dictatorship
Military
Epistemocracy
Ethnocracy Exilarchy
Federation
Feudalism
Gerontocracy
Military junta
Kleptocracy
Kratocracy
Kritocracy
Kritarchy Logocracy
Meritocracy
Geniocracy
Minarchism/Night Watchman
Monarchy
Absolute
Constitutional/Limited
Diarchy/Co-Kingship
Noocracy
Ochlocracy/Mobocracy
Oligarchy
Panarchism
Plutocracy
Puppet state
Republic
Crowned
Capitalist
Constitutional
FederalParliamentary
Federal
http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forms_of_governmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forms_of_governmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarianismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consociational_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Despotismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorshiphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorshiphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exilarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudalismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerontocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_juntahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleptocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kratocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kritocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kritarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geniocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minarchismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_watchman_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_monarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_monarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ochlocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panarchismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppet_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowned_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalist_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_parliamentary_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_parliamentary_republichttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forms_of_governmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forms_of_governmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarianismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consociational_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Despotismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorshiphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorshiphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exilarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudalismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerontocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_juntahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleptocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kratocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kritocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kritarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geniocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minarchismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_watchman_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_monarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_monarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ochlocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panarchismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppet_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowned_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalist_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_parliamentary_republic -
8/8/2019 Meta of Aristotle
141/143
Socialist state
Sociocracy
Technocracy
Cyberocracy
Netocracy
Theocracy
Theodemocracy
Timocracy
Totalitarianism
Tribal
Chiefdom
Politics portalList of forms of
government
vde
See also: Aristocrat (disambiguation)
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Pleaseimprove this article if you can. (June 2009)
Aristocracy is a form ofgovernment, in which a select few such as the most wise, strong or contributing citizens
rule, often starting as a system of cooption where a council of prominent citizens add leading soldiers, merchants,
land owners, priests, or lawyers to their number. Aristocracy deforms when it becomes hereditaryelite.
Aristocracies have most often been deformed to hereditaryplutocratic systems. They sometimes include amonarch who although a member of the aristocracy, rules over it as well as over the rest of society.
The term "aristocracy" is derived from the Greek languagearistokratia, meaning 'the rule of the best'.[1] See
Aristocracy for the historical roots of the term.
[edit] See also
Plutocracy Oligarchy
[edit] References
History, John Cannon (Editor), Oxford University Press, 1997, ISBN 9780198661764
1. ^ The Oxford Companion to British History, John Cannon (Editor), Oxford University Press,1997, ISBN 9780198661764
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy_(government)"Categories: Forms of government | Social sciences | Social groups | Social classes | Oligarchy
Hidden categories: Cleanup from June 2009 | All pages needing cleanup
Views
Article Discussion Edit this page History
Personal tools
Log in / create account
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy_(bureaucratic)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodemocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timocracyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiefdomh