Thermal Gyroscope Study of Various MEMS Gyroscopes design, there advantages and Simulation of Thermal Gyroscope

on COMSOL

Nemish Kanwar 2012A4PS305P

Akershit Agarwal 2012A4PS340P

Varun Prabodh Sharma 2012A4PS294P

Submitted to Dr N N Sharma

11/16/2014

Table of Contents

1. Abstract 2

2. History 2

3. MEMS Gyroscopes 4

4. About Various MEMS Gyroscope Designs 4

5. Application 8

6. Principle 9

7. Design 10-12

8. Modification 13

9. Model 14-16

10. COMSOL Simulation Result 17-18

11. Results 19-20

12. Conclusion 20

13. References 21

1

Abstract

Gyroscopes are attracting a lot of research these days, and MEMS gyroscopes are expected to make a huge impact on the market in the near future. They have found automotive applications such as vehicle stability control, navigation assist, and roll-over detection in high-end cars, where cost is not a major factor. Examples of consumer applications are 3D input devices, robotics, platform stability, camcorder stabilization, virtual reality, and more. With cost prohibitive existing designs, new models must be studied.

This report is intended to study various existing MEMS gyroscope designs, and to propose a modified design simulation of the thermal gyroscope. COMSOL has been used to create the simplified model and to simulate the effects of angular rate on the pressure difference. Hence, the device’s sensitivity and applicability have been obtained. The study is not expected to be conclusive, since it is only for a particular design based on thermal principles, and further research is recommended.

A Brief History of Gyroscope

In order to discuss MEMS gyroscopes we must first understand gyroscopes in general and what role they play in science. Technically, a gyroscope is any device that can measure angular velocity. As early as the 1700s, spinning devices were being used for sea navigation in foggy conditions. The more traditional spinning gyroscope was invented in the early 1800s, and the French scientist Jean Bernard Leon Foucault coined the term gyroscope in 1852. In the late 1800s and early 1900ís gyroscopes were patented for use on ships. Around 1916, the gyroscope found use in aircraft where it is still commonly used today. Throughout the 20th century improvements were made on the spinning gyroscope. In the 1960s, optical gyroscopes using lasers were first introduced and soon found commercial success in aeronautics and military applications. In the last ten to fifteen years, MEMS gyroscopes have been introduced and advancements have been made to create mass-produced successful products with several advantages over traditional macro-scale devices.

2

Traditional Gyroscopes

Usually, when one talks about gyroscopes, most people think of heavy spinning disks, tops or bicycle wheels. However, a number of devices are based on the gyroscope’s principle that look nothing like the mechanical gyroscope.

Gyroscopes function differently depending on their type. Traditional spinning gyroscopes work on the basis that a spinning object that is tilted perpendicularly to the direction of the spin will have a precession. The precession keeps the device oriented in a vertical direction so the angle relative to the reference surface can be measured.

Optical gyroscopes are most commonly ring laser gyroscopes. These devices send two lasers around a circular path in opposite directions. If the path spins, a phase shift can be detected since the speed of light always remain constant. Usually the rings are triangles or rectangles with mirrors at each corner. Optical gyroscopes are a great improvement to the spinning mass gyroscopes because there is no wear, greater reliability and smaller size and weight.

3

MEMS Gyroscopes

Even after the introduction of laser ring gyroscopes, a lot of properties were desired. MEMS vibrating mass gyroscopes aimed to create smaller, more sensitive devices. Many types of MEMS gyroscopes have appeared in the literature, with most falling into the categories of tuning-fork gyros, oscillating wheels, Foucault pendulums, and wine glass resonators. Conventional (non-MEMS) spinning wheel gyros are common, but levitation and rotation of a MEMS device with no springs has not yet been commercialized.

About Various MEMS Gyroscope Designs 1. Tuning Fork Gyroscopes

Tuning fork gyros contain a pair of masses that are driven to oscillate with equal amplitude but in opposite directions. When rotated, the Coriolis force creates an orthogonal vibration that can be sensed by a variety of mechanisms. The Draper Lab gyro uses comb-type structures to drive the tuning fork into resonance.

4

The first working prototype of the Draper Lab comb drive tuning fork gyro is shown here in an SEM image. Due to the superior mechanical properties of single-crystal silicon, a much better performance was achieved using single-crystal silicon with the dissolved wafer process.

Rotation causes the proof masses to vibrate out of plane, and this motion is sensed capacitively with a custom CMOS ASIC. The technology has been licensed to Rockwell, Boeing, Honeywell, and others.

The resonant modes of a MEMS inertial sensor are extremely important. In a gyro, there is typically a vibration mode that is driven and a second mode for output sensing. In some cases, the input and output modes are degenerate or nearly so. If the I/O modes are chosen such that they are separated by ~10%, the open-loop sensitivity will be increased due to the resonance effect. It is also critical that no other resonant modes be close to the I/O resonant frequencies.

5

6

2. Vibrating-Wheel Gyroscopes

Many reports of vibrating-wheel gyros also have been published. In this type of gyro, the wheel is driven to vibrate about its axis of symmetry, and rotation about either in-plane axis results in

the wheel's tilting, a change that can be detected with capacitive electrodes under the wheel.

The vibrating wheel gyro made by Bosch Corp., with capacitive sensing under the wheel, can be used to detect two in-plane rotational axes.

It is possible to sense two axes of rotation with a single vibrating wheel. A surface micro-machined polysilicon vibrating wheel gyro has been designed at the U.C. Berkeley Sensors and Actuators Center.

This polysilicon surface micro-machined vibrating wheel gyro was designed at the Berkeley Sensors and Actuators Center. The potential for combining the mechanical resonator and sense and drive electronics on a single chip permits extreme miniaturization.

3. Wine Glass Resonator Gyroscopes. A third type of gyro is the wine glass resonator. Fabricated from fused silica, this device is also known as a hemispherical resonant gyro. Researchers at the University of Michigan have fabricated resonant-ring gyros in planar form. In a wine glass gyro, the resonant ring is driven to resonance and the positions of the nodal points

The Silicon Sensing Systems gyro is fabricated from single-crystal silicon with metal added for higher conductivity. This device measures 29 by 29 by 18 mm and is used to stabilize the Segway Human Transporter.

Analog Devices has been working on MEMS gyros for many years, and has patented several concepts based on modified tuning forks. The company has recently introduced the ADXRS family of integrated angular rate-sensing gyros, in which the mass is tethered to a polysilicon frame that allows it to resonate in only one direction. Capacitive silicon sensing elements inter-digitized with stationary silicon beams attached to the substrate measure the Coriolis-induced displacement of the resonating mass and its frame.

The iMEMS ADXRS angular rate-sensing gyro from Analog Devices integrates an angular rate sensor and signal processing electronics onto a single piece of silicon. Based on the Coriolis Effect, it’s very low noise output makes it a good choice for GPS receivers, where critical location information is required during temporary disruptions of GPS signals.

7

These devices are based on a vibrating rod that is typically oriented out of the plane of the chip. They are therefore challenging to build with planar fabrication tools, but recent advances in MEMS technology allow very high aspect ratio MEMS that make it possible to fabricate the pendulum without hand assembly of the rod.

Application

• Space Orientation: The Oscillation can also be used and controlled in vibrating structure gyroscope for the positioning of spacecraft such as Cassini-Huygens

• Automotive: Automotive yaw rate sensors detect error in predicted yaw response in a car in conjunction with Steering wheel sensor. Advanced systems are able to detect rollover of a car

• Entertainment: Different gaming companies like Nintendo, Sony employ gyroscope to make controllers for providing good gaming experience to its customers

• Cameras: Image Stabilization System on Camera and Videos employ Vibratory Gyroscope

• Industrial Robotics: Vibrations in Robots are detected via MEMS gyroscopes, this helps robot to work with more precision

With gyros costing as little as $10.00 per sensed axis, they should soon claim a sizeable market share.

Summary

MEMS inertial sensing is an established industry, with performance-to-cost rapidly improving each year. Gyroscopes and angular accelerometers are entering the marketplace and will soon make many non-MEMS components obsolete. They should also open up new applications due to their small size and weight, modest power consumption and cost, and high reliability.

8

Principle

The operating principle of the Thermal MEMS gyroscope is the deflection of a current of moving hot fluid by the Coriolis force. The Coriolis force refers to the appearance of an object in rectilinear motion being deflected from its course if observed from a rotating frame of reference. The Coriolis force is sometimes referred to as a “fictitious” force, since it disappears when the physics of the situation are described within an inertial frame of reference.

𝐹𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑠 = 2𝑚(𝜔��⃗ × 𝑉�⃗ )

9

Design

In this device, 2 heaters are placed on the opposite side of device and are switched on/off alternatively. This creates an oscillating flow of fluid within the sensor, from Heater-On to Heater-Off. This flow is deflected in the y-direction due to Coriolis force which is directly proportional to x-velocity of fluid. Shown below is the plot of velocity vector represented by arrow

10

This deviation of air flow results in Temperature gradient between sensor 1 and sensor 2 as shown below

The temperature difference is plotted for different angular velocity of device

11

Periodically reversing the direction of air flow by changing the point of heat influx, helps cancel out the effect of linear acceleration, which needs to be filtered out to get pure rotation effect. In the device frame, the Coriolis force direction reverses when the velocity changes direction for same rotation-sense. If acceleration was linear and not a rotation, the temperature difference would not fluctuate in sign, and this difference can be noticed by the electronics in order to filter out the effect.

12

Modification

• We have modified our model in terms of feasibility in the practical model. In the given model there was no inlet and outlet for the fluid which would continuously raise its temperature. Hence we have given an inlet and an outlet for the fluid.

• We have given constant velocity and removed the heaters.

• Instead of temperature sensors we are measuring the pressure difference using pressure sensors.

• Due to the rotation of the body the air is deflected on one side and we get a higher pressure on the side where it deflects and lower on the other side.

In this manner we can judge in which direction the body rotates.

13

Our Model

For the simulation, a cubic volume of air was taken as the domain of study. The following model was made on COMSOL Multiphysics version 4.3:

Geometry

Units

Length unit µm Angular unit deg

Materials

Air [gas] was taken as the material from the Material Browser inbuilt into COMSOL. This would be the easiest material to obtain when considering cost.

14

Properties of Material

Property Material Property Group Density Air [gas] Basic Dynamic Viscosity Air [gas] Basic

Laminar Flow was assumed, and the results confirmed that this was the right choice of physics.

Equations

These did not have to be modified, since the correct physics (laminar flow) was chosen.

Boundary Conditions Inlet

Normal Inflow Velocity 1 μm/s

Outlet

15

Pressure 0 Pa

Volume Force

Coriolis force is a body-force or volume force, acting on each moving point in the non-inertial frame It acts in y direction for x direction velocity and z axis of rotation. Since this is not an inbuilt function, we had to apply the equation for coriolis force in the body-force section. We have negleced the y-velocity in the force calculation since it is much less than the x direction velocity, as observed in the simulation.

x 0 y 2*1.15[kg/m^3]*omega[1/s]*u z 0

Mesh

Normal mesh has been used, with element size varying from 0.03 to 0.1micro-m

16

COMSOL Simulation Results:

Velocity Distribution:

Evidently, the velocity profile is shifted towards the Coriolis force direction, as expected.

Line Graph

Corresponding points have been chosen on opposite ends of the block, in the y direction. Since the force direction is y, the pressure at the point of higher y is expected to be higher. The two pressures are measured, and knowledge of velocity and pressure-difference gives us the magnitude of rotational velocity at that instant.

X=0.5 y=0.01 z=0.5 = Blue

X=0.5 y=0.99 z=0.5 = Green

17

The pressure difference increases linearly with increase in omega.

18

Result

Line Plots at P1: x=0.5 y=0.01 z=0.5 P2: x=0.5 y=0.99 z=0.5

The following data was obtained from COMSOL (𝜔,𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑃1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑃2)

1.00E+08 2.00E+08 3.00E+08 4.00E+08 5.00E+08 6.00E+08 7.00E+08 8.00E+08 9.00E+08 1.00E+09 8.74E-05 -4.62E-05 -1.72E-04 -2.90E-04 -3.97E-04 -4.91E-04 -5.70E-04 -6.28E-04 -6.60E-04 -6.58E-04 3.74E-04 5.25E-04 6.81E-04 8.42E-04 1.01E-03 1.18E-03 1.36E-03 1.55E-03 1.76E-03 1.97E-03

Using Matlab, The data Pressure difference was plotted for different angular velocity

And plot was also made for Omega v/s pressure difference and a correlation was found

19

Conclusion

Correlation between ω and ∆P was found out to be

ω=3.8e11*∆P-2.3e7

The slope is too high, and the sensitivity is expected to be too low to be of practical importance. Apart from this, additional sensors will be required to correct for velocity fluctuations. This is likely to drive up the cost of the device. However, if the sensing method is changed, and an independent oscillation driving mechanism is added, the sensitivity can be made high enough to become practical. Cost cannot be estimated without solving these problems first.

20

References

1. Aaron Burg,Azeem Meruani,Bobsand Heinrich,Michael Wickmann, MEMS Gyroscope and there applications

2. Nilgoon Zarei, Thermal MEMS Gyroscope Design and Characteristics Analysis, B.Sc., Shiraz University, 2009

3. Rui Feng, Jamal Bahari, John Dewey Jones, Albert M. Leung, MEMS thermal gyroscope with self-compensation of the linear acceleration effect, Elsevier ,30 September, 2013

4. Steven Nasiri, A Critical Review of MEMS Gyroscopes Technology and Commercialization Status, 2013

5. History of the Gyroscope, http://www.gyroscopes.org/history.asp

21