meetings and hearings in adjudication john redmond

17
MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Upload: simon-gallagher

Post on 11-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

MEETINGS AND HEARINGSin Adjudication

John Redmond

Page 2: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

DON’T!

But if you must…………..

Meetings and Hearings in Adjudication

Page 3: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

HGCRA s 108(2)

The Contract must enable the Adjudicator to take the initiative in ascertaining the facts and the law

But how?

The Statutory Background

Page 4: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Examples

(c) Meet and question any of the parties to the contract and their representatives

(d) Subject to obtaining any necessary consent from a third party, make such site visits and inspections as he considers appropriate, whether accompanied by the parties or not.

But note:

Scheme, para 13

Page 5: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

The adjudicator is required to

Avoid incurring unnecessary expense

Scheme para 12 (b)

Page 6: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

• The Preliminary Directions Meeting• The Site Visit• The Adjudicator’s Inquiry• The Hearing

4 types of meeting

Page 7: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Objectives:

• To clarify the issues in dispute• To resolve jurisdiction points• To establish the timetable

Particularly useful if one party is a newbie

Preliminary Directions

Page 8: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

An expensive luxury

If there is to be one, be clear about

• What are the relevant issues?• What do you really want to see?• Who needs to be there?• Who should not be there?

Prepare, list, check

The Site Visit

Page 9: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Never appropriate in adjudication

Remember how long trials take

Adjudication is not arbitration or litigation – it is not the final answer

Evidence under oath? Remember the Legal Services Act

The Full Hearing

Page 10: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Leggatt J in Gestmin SGPS v Credit Suisse [2013] EWHC 3560 (Comm):

“…the best approach….is…to place little if any reliance at all on witnesses’ recollections of what was said in meetings and conversations, and to base factual findings on inferences drawn from the documentary evidence and known or probable facts.”

The Full Hearing

Page 11: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Never hold a meeting without good reason

because:

• Cost• Things can go wrong

The fact that one party asks for a meeting is not a good reason

The Meeting or Adjudicator’s Inquiry

Page 12: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

The Meeting

Page 13: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Book early!

Allow time in the timetableFix a date even if a meeting is

unlikelyRemember to cancel it

The Meeting

Page 14: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Keep Control Set an agenda Keep to itPrepare

Know what the submissions say about the agenda points

Know who the relevant witnesses are and what they say in their statements

The Meeting

Page 15: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Control discussion

Discussion can be informativeAllow commentBut say when you have heard enough

StyleYour choice – but choose

The Meeting

Page 16: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

Keeping a note ManuscriptLaptopClerk

Avoid further submissions

The Meeting

Page 17: MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond

A meeting with the technical experts

All the above apply!

The Hot Tub