media killings and impunity in the philippines
DESCRIPTION
This is our hand-outs, a summary of what we have presented last July 08, 2010. It includes certain facts on impunity statistics in the Philippines , the effects and recommended solutions. For more information from our source, I will be willing to send it to your email.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Media Killings and Impunity in the Philippines](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55274f3c4979597b178b469c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Unraveling issues of Media killings and the culture of impunity
CM 218 – Mass Media and Society
Mock Press Conference
July 08, 2010
University of the East - Manila
Prof. Gladys Serafica
Guest Media Critics
Amer Amor
Charmie Pagulong
Presented by:
Acuna, Abegail I
Alcantara, Luis Jaime III D.
Asino, Rizie a.
Cervantes, Karla Camille
Estrada, Robinson
Izar, Nikko Norman C.
Pascua, Geloen Shekinah s.
Pascual, Fanny E.
Sadsad, Sheila Marie S.
Fajardo, Karisma Carla
![Page 2: Media Killings and Impunity in the Philippines](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55274f3c4979597b178b469c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Tracing the “beat’s” history
I. Facts and Figures
Impunity Index of media killings cases
Unsolved journalist murders per 1 million inhabitants for 2000-2009. Only nations with five or more unsolved cases are included. Cases are considered unsolved when no convictions have been obtained.
Rank Nation Unsolved CasesPopulation(in millions) Calculation Rating
1 Iraq* 88 31.5 88/31.5 2.794
2 Somalia 9 9.0 9/9.0 1.000
3 Philippines 55 90.3 55/90.3 0.609
Population data sources: Unless otherwise indicated, 2009 World Development Indicators, World Bank * World Population Prospects 2008, United Nations Population Division
CMFR DATABASE ON THE KILLING OF JOURNALISTS/MEDIA WORKERS IN THE PHILIPPINES SINCE 1986*
(Updated as of 18 June 2010)
The Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR) recorded 171 cases of killing of Filipino journalists/media workers since 1986. 32% (55 cases) non-work related and 68% (116 cases) work related.
Of the 171 journalists/media workers killed since 1986, 116 were killed because of their work. Seventy-eight out of the 116 work-related cases happened during the Arroyo administration (February 2001-June 30, 2010).
The number of journalists/media workers who were killed jumped to 113 after 32 were massacred in Maguindanao in November 2009. With 36 journalists/media workers killed, 2009 had the highest killing of Filipino journalists/media workers in history.
Most of the journalists/media workers killed in the line of duty since 1986 were based in the provinces. The Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao registered the most number (34) of work-related killings since 1986.
![Page 3: Media Killings and Impunity in the Philippines](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55274f3c4979597b178b469c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
One hundred and eight (93 percent) of the 116 journalists/media workers killed in the line of duty since 1986 were male.
Most of the journalists and media workers killed in the line of duty worked solely for print (48 of the 116 or 41 percent), followed by those who worked for radio (44).
The number of print journalists who were killed increased after the Maguindanao massacre where most (24 out of the 32 fatalities) were working solely for print. This includes Reynaldo “Bebot” Momay whose body has yet to be found.
http://www.cmfr-phil.org/map/index_inline.html.
CPJ’s Statistical Analysis according to Investigation (1992-2010)
Job *
22% Broadcast reporter
1% Camera Operator
34% Columnist / Commentator
10% Editor
4% Photographer
31% Print reporter/writer
7% Publisher/Owner
Medium *
54% Print
47% Radio
6% Television
Gender
91% Male
9% Female
Local / Foreign
100% Local
Murder Victims
47% Taken Captive
26% Threatened
47% Tortured
Type of Death
3% Dangerous Assignment
97% Murder
Impunity in Murder Cases
92% Complete impunity
8% Partial justice
Suspected Source of Fire in Murder Cases
14% Criminal group
70% Government Officials
8% Political Group
9% Unknown
Beats Covered by Victims *
38% Corruption
25% Crime
![Page 4: Media Killings and Impunity in the Philippines](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55274f3c4979597b178b469c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
7% Human Rights
60% Politics
1% War
Freelance
9% Freelance
http://cpj.org/killed/asia/philippines/
II. Causes of media killings
A. The legal environment for Media (Laws and provisions under the Constitution)
B. Government’s attitude towards press freedom (Administrations activity and insights for media)
C. Media’s incapacity of self-defense/Sending out the media workers in a hostile environment
D. Lack of political wills an inadequate legal framework, a weak judicial system, police inefficiency, scant resources, and negligence and corruption on the part of government as causes of impunity.
E. State of self-regulation.
F. Increasing cases of impunity.
III. What are the effects?
According to Ricardo Trotti, media killings and impunity of it will cause self-censorship, misinformation, manipulation of news, erosion of the media’s watchdog role, media closure, and ultimately “journalism that is reluctant to expose the truth.”
The plague of impunity is having a broader effect on society as a whole, effectively choking off the flow of news and information.
Media killings will produce different tenets that surmise the dangers of every media men and to the
people as well. Moreover, it will be a conspicuous fact that information flow is bounded within any
outside forces. Most of the people in the industry and the society itself became alarmed and orchestrate
the law that will protect the journalist. The said response is addressed according to what media is
portraying about the hostile environment media have. Moreover, they have driven to a point that current
administration or government is the primary factor of the cases. At the end, three things will happen.
They will be too precautious for any news related on media killings. Diminishing trust for the government,
since the government failed to respond to the increasing cases of media killings and impunity. Lastly, it
will create a mere distort image of what media is all about and what is its risks.
V. Solutions
![Page 5: Media Killings and Impunity in the Philippines](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55274f3c4979597b178b469c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A. According to Luis V. Teodoro
1. Media advocacy and journalists’ organizations need to deepen and accelerate the continuing education
of journalists, especially of the untrained or inadequately trained. But it is also necessary to engage
journalism schools and the Commission on Higher Education to assist the effort to improve the
professional and ethical training of future practitioners at the tertiary level. The same groups including
journalism and communication schools must add media literacy planks to their training programs to
educate the public on the essential role of the press in society as well as on the need for the public to
monitor press performance and to demand observance of the press’ own values.
2. As the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility has been doing, other media advocacy and
journalists’ groups need to engage the law community on at least two levels: initiating changes in the law
curriculum towards the encouragement of free expression advocacy as suggested by Dean Pangalangan,
and to work with the same community in the reform of those laws that affect the exercise of free
expression, such as the libel law, the decriminalization of which is decades overdue.
3. Equally important, the press needs to even more rigorously monitor and hold the powerful to account,
to give voice to the voiceless, to be fair, humane and just, and to defend its constitutionally protected
freedom both through conscious advocacy as well as responsible practice.
B. According to Melinda Quintos De Jesus
Melinda Quintos de Jesus discussed the importance of ethics and journalistic principles in the safety
training program. She noted, “If journalists do the right thing, they will be protected by the people. There
will be public outrage when someone is killed. There will be action at the highest level because there is
outrage that a good journalist is killed.”
C. Media industry must also look inwards to consider what they themselves can do to protect journalists –
from self-regulating against unscrupulous journalism to providing journalist trainings on ethics, safety,
and security
D. Finally, the market should involve its own checks. Public awareness and media literacy empowers citizens
to use the press more critically.The last involves the public in the upholding media freedom as well as the
social responsibilities of journalism as public service. A media literate public appreciates and understands
the role of the press in society. The public can evaluate the performance of the press, voice its criticism of
its failings as well as encourage and applaud its strong points.
![Page 6: Media Killings and Impunity in the Philippines](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082604/55274f3c4979597b178b469c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
E. Merging of different Government organizations (esp. Law/security related) , NGO’s and Journalists group.
Resources:
www.cpij.org
www.cmfr.org
www.cpj.org
www.chr.org
“Trust in the LORD with all your heart; do not depend on your own understanding. Seek His will in all you do, and He will direct your paths”
(Proverbs 3:5-6)
GOD BLESS!