mechanical properties of native tree species for soil ... · soil bioengineering is an effective...

1
Data was analyzed using the Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS) standard version 13.0 for Windows The species considered were selected based on their native characteristics and widespread existence on the slopes. Mechanical Properties of Native Tree Species for Soil Bioengineering in Northeastern Mexico Zavala-González R 1 ., Cantu-Silva I 1 ., González-Rodríguez H 1 ., Tetsuya Kubota 2 1 Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Carretera Nacional No. 85, Km 145, Linares, Nuevo León, México 67700; 2 Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka Japan. 1-INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM STATEMENT 1.-Maximum force to breakage of roots is influenced by diameter? Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of roots is different between four species:Cercis canadensis, Celtis laevigata, Quercus rysophylla and Ligustrum lucidum. Due to causes such as small-scale earthquakes or the increasing amount of heavy rainfall extreme events, many slopes are potentially unstable. This plays an important role on the slopes of this orogenic belt, making areas like the one in this study prone to landslide disasters. 2- RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESIS 3.- EXPERIMENTAL SETUP 4.-RESULTS The relationships among root diameter, tensile strength (T s ), and modulus of elasticity (E root ) was negative and could be fitted with a power regression equation, showing highly significant values p<0.01. Celtis laevigata showed the maximum value of tensile strength (T s ) 28.11 N/mm 2 while the minimum value of tensile strength was observed in Ligustrum lucidum 5.27 N/mm 2 . For the variable modulus of elasticity (E root ) Celtis laevigata showed the maximum value of 90.01N/mm 2 while the minimum value of modulus of elasticity was observed in Ligustrum lucidum 29.16 N/mm 2 . Results of mechanical proprieties are showed the following ascending order: Ligustrum lucidum < Quercus rysophylla < Cercis canadensis < Celtis laevigata. Likewise, Celtis laevigata showed the highest tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of all investigated species. y = 160.17x -1.545 R² = 0.8461 y = 16.488x-0.477 R² = 0.6454 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 2 4 6 8 10 Eroot (N/mm2) Ts (N/mm2) Diameter (mm) Cercis canadensis Eroot (N/mm2) y = 4221.6x-3.501 R² = 0.9623 y = 643.31x-2.091 R² = 0.7242 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 2 4 6 8 10 Eroot (N/mm2) Ts (N/mm2) Diameter (mm) Celtis laevigata Eroot (N/mm2) y = 186.83x-2.182 R² = 0.7906 y = 299.87x-1.609 R² = 0.6217 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 2 4 6 8 10 Eroot (N/mm2) Ts (N/mm2) Diameter (mm) Quercus rysophylla Eroot (N/mm2) Soil bioengineering is an effective tool for treatment of a variety of unstable and/ or eroding sites. Regarding tree forest species, the tests were conducted with the Universal Testing Machine Shimadzu type SLFL- 100KN. Sampling method Preparation of root samples for analysis Tensile strength test T s = F max /π (D/2) 2 E root = (F max /A 0 ) CE/L 0 Statistical analysis The roots were extracted from exposed root systems with least disturbance in the area. and the root samples were classified by diameter range and They were cut to approximately 10 cm in length and individually labeled for further testing. Mattia et al., 2005, Genet et al. 2005, Bischetti et al., 2005, De Baets et al., 2008 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.) Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney U. (Steel and Torrie, 1980) Tension tests were conducted successfully on 85% of the total collected samples. The remaining 15% failed by root system damage instead of the applied tension, that is attributed to tests discarded by displaced bark A total of 120 samples were successfully tested: 30 for each species Table 2. Maximum, minimum and average values of maximum force to root breakage (F max ), tensile strength (T s ) and modulus of elasticity (E root ) of the ten species analyzed. F max (N) T s (N/mm 2 ) E root (N/mm 2 ) Species Max. Min. Avg. Max. Min. Avg. Max. Min. Avg. Cercis canadensis 815.63 12.50 161.56 12.25 4.73 9.09 143.31 35.94 52.32 Celtis laevigata 500.28 60.25 150.32 47.77 6.50 28.11 236.34 11.69 90.01 Quercus rysophylla 550.00 18.75 143.43 32.91 7.60 16.75 98.20 6.37 32.47 Ligustrum lucidum 646.88 15.50 157.79 16.02 4.92 5.27 50.14 12.93 29.16 If p values are ≤0.05, the mean comparison is declared different. vs Diameter T s E root C. canadensis C. laevigata 0.41 0.14 0.04 Q. rysophylla 0.60 0.01 0.00 L. lucidum 0.21 0.59 0.25 C. laevigata Q. rysophylla 0.32 0.45 0.3 L. lucidum 0.50 0.00 0.80 Q. rysophylla L. lucidum 0.24 0.14 0.00 Table 1. P values of the Mann Whitney U test to compare root diameter, tensile strength (T s ) and modulus of elasticity (E root ) in different species y = 58.156x-1.068 R² = 0.7884 y = 196.09x-0.469 R² = 0.4493 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 2 4 6 8 10 Eroot (N/mm2) Ts (N/mm2) Diameter (mm) Ligustrum lucidum Eroot (N/mm2) Ts (N/mm2) elationship between diameter of roots, tensile strength (T s ) and Modulus of elasticity (E root ) Bibliography 5.-CONCLUSIONS Bischetti, G.B., Chiaradia, E.A., Epis, T., Morloti, E., 2009. Root cohesion of forest Species in the Italian Alps. Plant Soil, 71-89. DOI: 10.1007/511104-009-9941-0 De Baets S, Poesen J, Reubens B, Wemans K, De Baerdemeaker J, Muys B. 2008. Root tensile strength and root distribution of typical Mediterranean plant species and their contribution to soil shear strength. Plant Soil 305:207226. DOI: 10.1007/511104-008-9553-0 Gray DH. Sotir RB. 1996. Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control. 35-37. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Improvement 4:8189.DOI:10.1680/grim.2000.4.2.81 Pollen N. 2007. Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of steambanks: accounting for soil shear strength and moisture. Catena 69:197-205. DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2006.05.004 Pollen N, Simon A. 2005. Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on steam bank stability using a fiber bundle model. Water Resources Research 41:1-11. DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003801

Upload: others

Post on 01-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mechanical Properties of Native Tree Species for Soil ... · Soil bioengineering is an effective tool for treatment of a variety of unstable and/ or eroding sites. Regarding tree

Data was analyzed using the Statistical

Program for Social Sciences (SPSS)

standard version 13.0 for Windows

The species considered were selected based on their native

characteristics and widespread existence on the slopes.

Mechanical Properties of Native Tree Species for Soil Bioengineering

in Northeastern MexicoZavala-González R1., Cantu-Silva I1., González-Rodríguez H1., Tetsuya Kubota2

1 Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Carretera Nacional No. 85, Km 145, Linares, Nuevo León, México 67700; 2 Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka Japan.

1-INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM STATEMENT

1.-Maximum force to breakage of roots is influenced by diameter?

Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of roots is different between four

species:Cercis canadensis, Celtis laevigata, Quercus rysophylla and Ligustrum

lucidum.

Due to causes such as small-scale earthquakes or the increasing amount of heavy rainfall extreme

events, many slopes are potentially unstable.

This plays an important role on the slopes of this orogenic belt, making areas like the one in this study

prone to landslide disasters.

2- RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESIS

3.- EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

4.-RESULTS

The relationships among root

diameter, tensile strength (Ts), and

modulus of elasticity (Eroot) was

negative and could be fitted with a

power regression equation,

showing highly significant

values p<0.01.

Celtis laevigata showed the

maximum value of tensile strength

(Ts) 28.11 N/mm2 while the

minimum value of tensile strength

was observed in Ligustrum

lucidum 5.27 N/mm2.

For the variable modulus of

elasticity (Eroot) Celtis laevigata

showed the maximum value of

90.01N/mm2 while the minimum

value of modulus of elasticity was

observed in Ligustrum lucidum

29.16 N/mm2.

Results of mechanical proprieties are showed the following ascending order: Ligustrum lucidum < Quercus rysophylla < Cercis canadensis

< Celtis laevigata.

Likewise, Celtis laevigata showed the highest tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of all investigated species.

y = 160.17x-1.545

R² = 0.8461

y = 16.488x-0.477

R² = 0.6454

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 2 4 6 8 10

Ero

ot

(N/m

m2

)

Ts

(N/m

m2

)

Diameter (mm)

Cercis canadensis

Eroot

(N/mm2)

y = 4221.6x-3.501

R² = 0.9623

y = 643.31x-2.091

R² = 0.7242

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 2 4 6 8 10

Ero

ot

(N/m

m2

)

Ts

(N/m

m2

)

Diameter (mm)

Celtis laevigata

Eroot

(N/mm2)

y = 186.83x-2.182

R² = 0.7906

y = 299.87x-1.609

R² = 0.6217

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 2 4 6 8 10

Ero

ot

(N/m

m2

)

Ts

(N/m

m2

)Diameter (mm)

Quercus rysophylla

Eroot

(N/mm2)

Soil bioengineering is an effective tool for treatment of a variety of unstable and/ or eroding sites.

Regarding tree forest species, the tests

were conducted with the Universal

Testing Machine Shimadzu type SLFL-

100KN.

Sampling method

Preparation of root samples for analysis

Tensile strength test

Ts = Fmax /π (D/2)2 Eroot = (Fmax/A0) CE/L0

Statistical analysis

The roots were extracted from exposed root systems with

least disturbance in the area. and the root samples were

classified by diameter range and They were cut to

approximately 10 cm in length and individually labeled for

further testing.

Mat

tia

etal

.,2005,G

enet

etal

.2005,B

isch

etti

etal

.,2005,D

eB

aets

etal

.,2008

(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.)

Kruskal-Wallis test.

Mann-Whitney U.

(Steel and Torrie, 1980)

Tension tests were

conducted successfully on

85% of the total collected

samples.

The remaining 15% failed

by root system damage

instead of the applied

tension, that is attributed to

tests discarded by displaced

bark

A total of 120 samples were successfully

tested: 30 for each species

Table 2. Maximum, minimum and average values of maximum

force to root breakage (Fmax), tensile strength (Ts) and modulus of

elasticity (Eroot) of the ten species analyzed.

F max (N) Ts (N/mm2) Eroot(N/mm2)Species Max. Min. Avg. Max. Min. Avg. Max. Min. Avg.

Cercis

canadensis815.63 12.50 161.56 12.25 4.73 9.09 143.31 35.94 52.32

Celtis laevigata 500.28 60.25 150.32 47.77 6.50 28.11 236.34 11.69 90.01

Quercus

rysophylla550.00 18.75 143.43 32.91 7.60 16.75 98.20 6.37 32.47

Ligustrum

lucidum646.88 15.50 157.79 16.02 4.92 5.27 50.14 12.93 29.16

If p values are ≤0.05, the mean comparison is declared different.

vs Diameter Ts Eroot

C. canadensis C. laevigata 0.41 0.14 0.04

Q. rysophylla 0.60 0.01 0.00

L. lucidum 0.21 0.59 0.25

C. laevigata Q. rysophylla 0.32 0.45 0.3

L. lucidum 0.50 0.00 0.80

Q. rysophylla L. lucidum 0.24 0.14 0.00

Table 1. P values of the Mann Whitney U test to compare root

diameter, tensile strength (Ts) and modulus of elasticity (Eroot) in

different species

y = 58.156x-1.068

R² = 0.7884

y = 196.09x-0.469

R² = 0.4493

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 2 4 6 8 10

Ero

ot

(N/m

m2

)

Ts

(N/m

m2

)

Diameter (mm)

Ligustrum lucidum

Eroot (N/mm2)

Ts (N/mm2)

elationship between diameter of roots, tensile

strength (Ts) and Modulus of elasticity (Eroot)

Bibliography

5.-CONCLUSIONS

Bischetti, G.B., Chiaradia, E.A., Epis, T., Morloti, E., 2009. Root cohesion of forest Species in the Italian Alps. Plant Soil, 71-89. DOI: 10.1007/511104-009-9941-0

De Baets S, Poesen J, Reubens B, Wemans K, De Baerdemeaker J, Muys B. 2008. Root tensile strength and root distribution of typical Mediterranean plant species and their contribution to soil shear strength. Plant Soil 305:207–226. DOI: 10.1007/511104-008-9553-0

Gray DH. Sotir RB. 1996. Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control. 35-37. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Improvement 4:81–89.DOI:10.1680/grim.2000.4.2.81

Pollen N. 2007. Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of steambanks: accounting for soil shear strength and moisture. Catena 69:197-205. DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2006.05.004

Pollen N, Simon A. 2005. Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on steam bank stability using a fiber bundle model. Water Resources Research 41:1-11. DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003801