mechanical intro 15.0 appendixa buckling

Upload: dfal13

Post on 03-Jun-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    1/34

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    2/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 20142 Release 15.0

    Chapter OverviewIn this Appendix, performing linear buckling analyses in Mechanical will be

    covered.

    Contents:

    A. Background On Buckling

    B. Buckling Analysis Procedure

    C. Workshop AppA-1

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    3/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 20143 Release 15.0

    A. Background on Buckling

    Many structures require an evaluation of their structural stability. Thin columns,

    compression members, and vacuum tanks are all examples of structureswhere stability considerations are important.

    At the onset of instability (buckling) a structure will have a very large change in

    displacement {x} under essentially no change in the load (beyond a smallload perturbation).

    F F

    Stable Unstable

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    4/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 20144 Release 15.0

    Background on Buckling

    Eigenvalue or linear buckling analysispredicts the theoretical buckling strength of

    an ideal linear elasticstructure.

    This method corresponds to the textbook approach of linear elastic buckling

    analysis.

    The eigenvalue buckling solution of a Euler column will match the classical Euler solution.

    Imperfections and nonlinear behaviors prevent most real world structures fromachieving their theoretical elastic buckling strength.

    Linear buckling generally yields unconservativeresults by not accounting for these

    effects.

    Although unconservative, linear buckling has the advantage of beingcomputationally cheap compared to nonlinear buckling solutions.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    5/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 20145 Release 15.0

    Basics of Linear Buckling

    For a linear buckling analysis, the eigenvalue problem below is solved to get the

    buckling load multiplier liand buckling modes yi:

    Assumptions:

    [K] and [S] are constant: Linear elastic material behavior is assumed

    Small deflection theory is used, and nononlinearities included

    It is important to remember these assumptions related to performing linear

    bucklinganalysesin Mechanical.

    0ii

    SK yl

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    6/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 20146 Release 15.0

    B. Buckling Analysis Procedure

    A Static Structural analysis will need to be performed prior to (or in conjunction

    with) a buckling analysis.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    7/34 2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 20147 Release 15.0

    Geometry and Material Properties

    Any type of geometry supported by Mechanical may be used in buckling analyses:

    Solid bodies

    Surface bodies (with appropriate thickness defined)

    Line bodies (with appropriate cross-sections defined)

    Only buckling modes and displacement results are available for line bodies.

    Although Point Masses may be included in the model, only inertial loads affect point

    masses, so the applicability of this feature may be limited in buckling analyses

    For material properties, Youngs Modulus and Poissons Ratio are required as a

    minimum

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    8/34

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    9/34 2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 20149 Release 15.0

    Loads and Supports

    At least one structural load, which causes buckling, should be applied to the

    model: Allstructural loads will be multiplied by the load multiplier (l)to determine the buckling

    load (see below).

    Compression-only supports are not recommended.

    The structure should be fully constrained to prevent rigid-body motion.

    F x l = Buckling Load

    In a buckling analysis all appliedloads (F) are scaled by a

    multiplication factor (l) until the

    critical (buckling) load is reached

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    10/34 2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201410 Release 15.0

    Loads and Supports

    Special considerations must be given if constant andproportional loads are

    present.

    The user may iterate on the buckling solution, adjusting the variable loads until the load

    multiplier becomes 1.0 or nearly 1.0.

    Consider the example of a column with self weight WOand an externally applied forceA.

    A solution can be reached by iterating while adjusting the value ofAuntil l= 1.0. This

    insures the self weight = actual weight or WO* l WO .

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    11/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201411 Release 15.0

    Buckling SetupBuckling analyses are always coupled to a structural analysis within the project

    schematic.

    The Pre-Stress object in the tree contains the results from a structural analysis.

    The Details view of the Analysis Settings under the Linear Buckling branch allows the

    user to specify the number of buckling modes to find.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    12/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201412 Release 15.0

    Solving the Model

    After setting up the model the buckling analysis can be solved along with the static

    structural analysis.

    A linear buckling analysis is more computationally expensivethan a static analysis on the

    same model.

    The Solution Information branch provides detailed solution output.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    13/34

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    14/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201414 Release 15.0

    Reviewing Results

    Interpreting the Load Multiplier (l):

    The tower model below has been solved twice. In the first case a unit load is applied. In

    the second an expected load applied (see next page)

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    15/34

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    16/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201416 Release 15.0

    Reviewing Results

    The buckling load multipliers can be reviewed in the Timeline section of the

    results under the Linear Buckling analysis branch

    It is good practice to request more than one buckling mode to see if the structure may be

    able to buckle in more than one way under a given applied load.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    17/34

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    18/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201418 Release 15.0

    GoalsThe goal in this workshop is to verify linear buckling results in ANSYS Mechanical.

    Results will be compared to closed form calculations from a handbook.

    Next we will apply an expected load of 10,000 lbf to the model and determine its

    factor of safety.

    Finally we will verify that the structures material will not fail before buckling

    occurs.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    19/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201419 Release 15.0

    Assumptions

    The model is a steel pipe that is assumed to be fixed at one end and

    free at the other with a purely compressive load applied to the

    free end. Dimensions and properties of the pipe are:

    OD = 4.5 in ID = 3.5 in. E = 30e6 psi, I = 12.7 in^4, L = 120 in.

    In this case we assume the pipe conforms to the following handbookformula where P is the critical load:

    For the case of a fixed / free beam the parameter K = 0.25.

    2

    2

    'L

    IEKP

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    20/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201420 Release 15.0

    Assumptions

    Using the formula and data from the previous page we can

    predict the buckling load will be:

    lbfeP 3.65648)120( 771.1263025.0' 22

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    21/34

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    22/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201422 Release 15.0

    When the schematic is correctly set up it should appear as shown

    here.

    The drop target from the previous page indicates the outcome ofthe drag and drop operation. Cells A2 thru A4 from system (A) are

    shared by system (B). Similarly the solution cell A6 is transferred to

    the system B setup. In fact, the structural solution drives the

    buckling analysis.

    Project Schematic

    Drop Target

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    23/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201423 Release 15.0

    Project SchematicVerify that the Project units are set to US Customary (lbm, in, s, F, A, lbf, V).

    Verify units are set to Display Values in Project Units.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    24/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201424 Release 15.0

    3. From the static structural system (A),double click the Engineering Data cell.

    4. To match the hand calculations referencedearlier, change the Youngs modulus of thestructural steel.

    a. Highlight Structural Steel.b. Expand Isotropic Elasticity and modify

    Youngs Modulus to 3.0E7 psi.

    c. Return to Project.

    Note : changing this property here does not affect thestored value for Structural Steel in the General Materiallibrary. To save a material for future use we wouldExport the properties as a new material to the materiallibrary.

    . . . Project Schematic

    3.

    b.

    a.

    c.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    25/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201425 Release 15.0

    . . . Project Schematic5. From the static structural system (A),

    RMB the Geometry cell and Import

    Geometry. Browse to the filePipe.stp.

    6. Double click the Model cell to start

    Mechanical.

    When the Mechanical application opens the tree

    will reflect the setup from the project schematic.

    5.

    6.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    26/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201426 Release 15.0

    Preprocessing7. Set the working unit system to the U.S. customary

    system:

    a. U.S. Customary (in, lbm, psi, F, s, V, A).

    8. Apply constraints to the pipe:

    a. Highlight the Static Structural branch (A5).

    b. Select the surface on one end of the pipe.

    c.RMB > Insert > Fixed Support.

    a.

    b.

    a.

    c.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    27/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201427 Release 15.0

    Environment9. Add buckling loads:

    a. Select the surface on the opposite end of the pipe from the

    fixed support.

    b. RMB > Insert > Force.

    c. In the force detail change the Define by field toComponents.

    d. In the force detail enter 1 in the Magnitude field for the

    Z Component (or use -1 depending on which ends of thepipe are selected).

    c.

    d.

    a.

    b.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    28/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201428 Release 15.0

    . . . Environment10. Solve the model:

    a. Highlight the Solution branch for the Linear Buckling analysis

    (B6) and Solve.

    Note, this will automatically trigger a solve for the

    static structural analysis above it.

    11. When the solution completes:

    a. Highlight the buckling Solution branch (B6).

    The Timeline graph and the Tabular Data will display

    the 1stbuckling mode (more modes can be requested).

    b. RMB in the Timeline and choose Select All.

    c. RMB > Create Mode Shape Results (this will add a TotalDeformation branch to the tree).

    c.

    b.

    a.

    a.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    29/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201429 Release 15.0

    Click Solve to view the first mode

    Recall that we applied a unit (1) force thus the result compares well with our closed formcalculation of 65648 lbf.

    Results

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    30/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201430 Release 15.0

    . . . Results12. Change the force value to the expected load (10000

    lbf):

    a. Highlight the Force under the Static Structural (A5)branch

    b. In the details, change the Z Component of the forceto 10000 (or use -10000 depending on your selections).

    13. Solve:

    a. Highlight the Linear Buckling Solution branch (B6),RMB and Solve.

    11b.

    11a.

    12a.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    31/34

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    32/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201432 Release 15.0

    VerificationA final step in the buckling analysis is added here as a best practices exercise.

    We have already predicted the expected buckling load and calculated the factor of

    safety for our expected load. The results so far ONLY indicate results as they

    relate to buckling failure. To this point we can say nothing about how our

    expected load will affect the stresses and deflections in the structure.

    As a final check we will verify that the expected load (10000 lbf) will not cause

    excessive stresses or deflections before it is reached.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    33/34

    2014 ANSYS, Inc. February 12, 201433 Release 15.0

    . . . Verification14. Review Stresses for 10,000lbf load:

    a. Highlight the Solution branch under the Static

    Structural environment (A6).b. RMB > Insert > Stress > Equivalent Von Mises Stress.

    c. RMB > Insert > Deformation > Total.

    d. Solve.

    a.

    b.

    c.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical Intro 15.0 AppendixA Buckling

    34/34

    . . . VerificationA quick check of the stress results shows the model as loaded is well within the

    mechanical limits of the material being used (Engineering Data shows

    compressive yield = 36,259 psi).

    As stated, this is not a required step in a buckling analysis but should be regarded

    as good engineering practice.