mechanical engineering college of engineering qassim
TRANSCRIPT
Program Name: Mechanical Engineering
Qualification Level: B.Sc. Department: Mechanical Engineering College: College of Engineering Institution: Qassim University Academic Year: 2019/2020
Main Location: Main Campus Branches offering the Program: N/A
2
Table of Contents
A. Implementation of Previous Action Plan ................................................................... 3
B. Program Statistics ......................................................................................................... 3 1. Students Statistics (in the year concerned) .............................................................................. 3
2 . Cohort Analysis of Current Graduate Batch .......................................................................... 3
3.Analysis of Program Statistics ................................................................................................. 3
C. Program Learning Outcomes Assessment ................................................................. 4 1. Program Learning Outcomes Assessment Results. ................................................................. 4
2. Analysis of Program Learning Outcomes Assessment ........................................................... 6
D. Summary of Course Reports ....................................................................................... 6 1. Teaching of Planned Courses / Units ...................................................................................... 6
2. Courses with Variations ......................................................................................................... 6
3. Result Analysis of Course Reports.......................................................................................... 6
E. Program Activities ........................................................................................................ 7 1. Student Counseling and Support ............................................................................................. 7
2. Professional Development Activities for Faculty and Other Staff .......................................... 7
3. Research and Innovation ......................................................................................................... 8
4. Community Partnership ........................................................................................................... 8
5. Analysis of Program Activities ............................................................................................... 8
F. Program Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 9 1. Evaluation of Courses ............................................................................................................. 9
2. Students Evaluation of Program Quality ............................................................................... 11
3. Other Evaluations .................................................................................................................. 11
4. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) ...................................................................................... 11
5. Analysis of Program Evaluation ........................................................................................... 12
G. Difficulties and Challenges Faced Program Management ..................................... 13
H. Program Improvement Plan ..................................................................................... 13 I. Report Approving Authority ...................................................................................... 13 J. Attachments : ............................................................................................................... 13
3
A. Implementation of Previous Action Plan Considering the recommendations of previous year annual report, list the planned actions and
their status.
Planned Actions Responsibility
of Action
Planned
Completion
Date
Level of
Completion If Not Completed
Completed Not
Completed Reasons Proposed Actions
N/A
B. Program Statistics 1. Students Statistics (in the year concerned)
No. Item Results
1 Number of students who started the program 19
2 Number of students who graduated 15
3 Number of students who completed major tracks within the program N/A
4 Number of students who completed the program in the minimal time 15
5 Percentage of students completed the program in the minimal time (Completion rate) 78.95%
6 Number of students completed an intermediate award specified as an early exit point N/A
7 Percentage of students completed an intermediate award specified as an early exit point N/A
Comment on any special or unusual factors that might have affected the completion rates:
2 . Cohort Analysis of Current Graduate Batch Student Categories
Years
Total cohort
enrollment Withdrawn
Retained till
year end Not passed Passed Passing rate
Three Years
Ago
M 19 0 19 Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable
F 0 0 0
Total 19 0 19 Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable
Two Years
Ago
M 31 2 29 Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable
F 0 0 0
Total 31 2 29 Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable
Last Year
M 34 0 34 Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable
F 0 0 0
Total 34 0 34 Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable
Current
Year
M 35 1 34 Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable
F 0 0 0
Total 35 1 34 Unavailable Unavailable Unavailable
Comments on the results: Overall Completion Rate is satisfactory. Yearly completion rate is currently
unavailable.
* add more rows for further years ( if needed )
** attach separate cohort analysis report for each branch
3. Analysis of Program Statistics
(Including strengths, areas for improvement, and priorities for improvement)
Strengths :
a. Percentage of students who completed the program in the minimal time (Completion rate≈79%)
Areas for Improvement:
N/A
Priorities for Improvement:
N/A
4
C. Program Learning Outcomes Assessment
1. Program Learning Outcomes Assessment Results.
# Program Learning Outcomes Assessment
Methods (Direct and Indirect)
Performance
Target Results
Knowledge
K1 Identify complex mechanical
engineering problems by recognizing
the principles of mechanical
engineering subjects, basic sciences,
and mathematics.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam 60% 78.8%
K2 Relate knowledge of Math, Statistics,
basic sciences to their engineering
specialization (Design,
Manufacturing, and Thermo-fluids),
together with in-depth knowledge of
that specialization.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam 60% 75.3%
K3 Identify knowledge of societal,
health, safety, legal and cultural
issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to
professional engineering practice.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam 60% 67.2%
K4 Demonstrate knowledge of
engineering management principles.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam
60% 66.5%
K5 Recognize the impact of professional
engineering solutions in societal and
environmental contexts and the
ability to demonstrate knowledge of
and need for sustainable
development.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam 60% 73.4%
Skills
S1 Formulate, and solve complex
mechanical engineering problems by
applying principles of engineering,
science, and mathematics.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam
60% 72%
S2 Apply design concepts to produce
solutions that meet specified needs in
the mechanical engineering fields
with consideration of public health,
safety, and welfare, as well as global,
cultural, social, environmental, and
economic factors.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam 60% 71.3%
S3 Develop and conduct appropriate
experimentation, analyze and
interpret data, and use engineering
judgment to draw conclusions.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam
60% 75.2%
5
S4 Be able to function effectively on a
team whose members together can
provide leadership, create a
collaborative and inclusive
environment, establish goals, plan
tasks, and meet objectives.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam 60% 79.8%
S5 Be able to use the techniques, skills,
and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam
60% 75.3%
S6 Be able to acquire and apply new
knowledge as needed, using
appropriate learning strategies.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam
60% 73.6%
S7 Recognize ethical and professional
responsibilities in engineering
situations and make informed
judgments, which must consider the
impact of engineering solutions in
global, economic, environmental, and
societal contexts.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam 60% 74%
S8 Communicate effectively with a
range of audiences.
• Quizzes
• Assignments
• Midterm Exams
• Final Exam
60% 82.5%
Competence
C1 Apply reasoning informed by
contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and
cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to professional
engineering practice and solution to
solve design/manufacturing/thermo-
fluids engineering challenges.
• Mini Projects
• Oral Presentation
• Written report by
the students
60% 74.8%
C2 Face and solve unexpected problems in
a specific mechanical engineering field.
• Mini Projects
• Oral Presentation
• Written report by
the students
60% 74.6%
C3 Use basic workshop equipment safely
and appropriately.
• Mini Projects
• Oral Presentation
• Written report by
the students
60% 82%
C4 Prepare engineering drawings,
computer graphics and specialized
technical reports in mechanical
engineering applications.
• Mini Projects
• Oral Presentation
• Written report by
the students
60% 71.5%
C5 Use computational tools and
packages and write computer
programs pertaining to
• Mini Projects
• Oral Presentation
• Written report by
the students
60% 77.3%
6
design/manufacturing/thermo-fluids
engineering applications.
C6 Design and evaluate a specific
mechanical engineering
system/subsystem.
• Mini Projects
• Oral Presentation
• Written report by
the students
60% 59.3%
Comments on the Program Learning Outcome Assessment results.
S8, and C3 are satisfied PLOs but the others PLOs are accepted except PLO C6 which needs
to be improved and enhanced. * Include the results of measured learning outcomes during the year of the report according to the program plan for measuring
learning outcomes
** Attach a separate report on the program learning outcomes assessment results for male and female sections and for each branch
(if any)
2. Analysis of Program Learning Outcomes Assessment
(including strengths, Areas for Improvement:, and priorities for improvement)
Strengths :
S8, and C3 are strengths PLOs
Areas for Improvement:
C6 needs improvement.
Priorities for Improvement:
C6 is the Worst PLOs; it needs priorities improvement
D. Summary of Course Reports 1. Teaching of Planned Courses / Units List the courses / units that were planned and not taught during the academic year, indicating the reasons and
compensating actions.
Course Units/Topics Reasons Compensating Actions
N/A
2. Courses with Variations List courses with marked variations in results that are stated in the course reports, including: (completion rate, grade
distribution, student results, etc.), and giving reasons for these variations and actions taken for improvement.
Course Name
&Code variation Reasons for variation Actions taken
N/A
3. Result Analysis of Course Reports (Including strengths, Areas for Improvement: and priorities for improvement)
Strengths : • The things I had to do to succeed in the course, including assessment tasks and criteria for assessment, were
made clear to me.
• Sources of help for me during the course including faculty office hours and reference material, were made
clear to me.
• My instructor was fully committed to the delivery of the course. (Classes started on time, instructor always
present, material well prepared, etc.).
• My instructor(s) had thorough knowledge of the content of the course. • My instructor was available during office hours to help me.
• My instructor(s) were enthusiastic about what they were teaching.
• My instructor(s) cared about my progress and were helpful to me. • Course materials were of up to date and useful. (Texts, handouts, references etc.).
• The links between this course and other courses in my total program were made clear to me.
7
• This course helped me to improve my ability to think and solve problems rather than just memorize
information.
• This course improved my ability to communicate effectively.
Areas for Improvement:
None
Priorities for Improvement:
None
E. Program Activities 1. Student Counseling and Support
Activities Implemented *Brief Description
Welcome meeting with new students Student club held a welcome meeting with attendance of Dean and vise
dean of college in the beginning of each semester with new students
Knowledge workshops with new
students for guidance and orientation of
ME program
Student club “ASME Group” held lectures and workshops for new
students as guidance and orientation of ME program
Questionnaires for new students Student club “ASME Group” make a questionnaires for new students
about their abilities and hopes
Each student has an academic advisor Each FIVE students have an academic a divisor to solve their academic
problems and contact with them
At least 10 office hours a week are
scheduled by each faculty member
Each instructor spent at least 10 office hours a week in his office and
announced in schedule for all students
Faculty member is assigned to advise
group of students selecting their courses
in a semester
Each instructor is assigned to advise group of students as academic
advisor for selecting their courses in a semester
Faculty member explain to students how
to choose the appropriate branch in the
program
Faculty member cooperate with student club to explain to students how
to choose the appropriate branch in the program via lectures and
workshops…etc
Faculty member help students solving
problems
Each instructor is an academic advisor for group of students for help and
solve their academic problems
Faculty member advise students
planning their programs Faculty member advise students planning their programs
Comment on Student Counseling and Support **
QEC administrative has been supported the student activities and implementation
* including action time, number of participants, results and any other statistics.
** including performance evaluation on these activities
2. Professional Development Activities for Faculty and Other Staff
Activities Implemented *Brief Description
Blackboard System Workshops and lectures are held for training students and academic staff about
Blackboard System
Blackboard Electronic Courses Workshops and lectures for Blackboard Electronic Courses have been held for
academic staff
Blackboard Basic Level Workshops and lectures for Blackboard Basic Level have been held to academic
staff and students
Quality assurance in education
and distance learning
Workshops and lectures for NCAAA and ABET have been held to training and
raising academic staff knowledge
Comment on Professional Development Activities for Faculty and Other Staff **
Workshops and lectures are helped raising quality levels of academic staff and students
* including action time, number of participants, results and any other statistics.
** including performance evaluation on these activities
8
3. Research and Innovation
Activities Implemented *Brief Description
37 Publications Academic staff members
8 Research Projects Funded from scientific research Deanship (1251177 SR)
Comment on Research and Innovation **
Deanship of Scientific Research helped academic staff to research and solve problems of the industrial
connections.
* including action time, number of participants, results and any other statistics.
** including performance evaluation on these activities
4. Community Partnership
Activities Implemented *Brief Description
A community awareness
campaign to recycle waste
The Mechanical Engineering share in A community awareness campaign to
recycle waste
A community awareness
campaign to sort waste from the
source using containers in
Buraidah
The Mechanical Engineering share in A community awareness campaign to sort
waste from the source using containers in Buraidah
Hosting a number of high
school students in Al-
Bukayriyah Governorate to see
the college’s facilities and
laboratories and get to know the
departments and programs it
offers
The Mechanical Engineering share in Hosting a number of high school students
in Al-Bukayriyah Governorate to see the college’s facilities and laboratories and
get to know the departments and programs it offers
Awareness exhibition on traffic
safety The Mechanical Engineering share in Awareness exhibition on traffic safety
An awareness seminar on
inspection methods in
construction projects according
to the Saudi Building Code.
The Mechanical Engineering share in An awareness seminar on inspection
methods in construction projects according to the Saudi Building Code
Symposium and campaign of
your life is most important
The Mechanical Engineering share in a symposium accompanying the campaign
(Your Life is Most Important) for university bus drivers in order to enhance their
traffic awareness and the importance of the driver in maintaining traffic safety.
Comment on Community Partnership **
Academic staff success for cooperation with students in community partnership events.
* including action time, number of participants, results and any other statistics.
** including performance evaluation on these activities
5. Analysis of Program Activities (Including strengths, Areas for Improvement: and priorities for improvement)
Strengths :
1- Effectiveness of faculty member to participate in the activities.
2- Students ASME chapter who organize professional activates (Training/Workshops…etc)
3- Availability of the positive atmosphere and places for holding activities.
Areas for Improvement: More activities can be implemented.
Priorities for Improvement:
Preparation of professional training courses for the society.
9
F. Program Evaluation
1. Evaluation of Courses
Course
Code Course Title
Student
Evaluation ( Yes-No)
Other
Evaluations (specify)
Developmental
Recommendations
PHYS 131 General Physics Yes No None
GE 104 Basics of Engineering
Drawing Yes No None
MATH 106 Integral Calculus Yes No None
GE 105 Basics of Engineering
Technology Yes No None
MATH 107 Linear Algebra &
Analytic Geometry Yes No None
GE 201 Statics Yes No None
MATH 203 Differential and
Integral Calculus Yes No None
ME 241 Mechanical Drawing Yes No None
EE 318 Fundamentals of
Electric circuits Yes No None
GE 202 Dynamics Yes No
• Establishing another lecture
distribution & having enough
room for MMI
• More stress on homework
• Eliminate students withdraw
• Searching for CE-courses that
may need GE202 to be a
prerequisite
MATH 208 Differential equations Yes No None
CSC 209 Computer
Programming Yes No None
GE 211 Introduction to
Engineering Design-I Yes No
Modification/change the course
project
ME 251 Materials Engineering Yes No None
ME 252 Materials Engineering
Lab Yes No
Increasing number of
Equipment/Machines in the
Materials Science Lab
EE 339 Mechanical Machines Yes No None
GE 213 Introduction to
Engineering Design-2 Yes No None
STAT 325 Probabilities and
statistics Yes No None
ME350 Mechanics of Materials Yes No None
ME 352 Mechanics of Materials
Laboratory Yes No
• Maintenance and servicing of
the testing apparatuses and
equipment.
• Urgent need for a specialized
laboratory technician to assist
the instructor in supplying the
test specimens and organizing
the Lab.
10
Course
Code Course Title
Student
Evaluation ( Yes-No)
Other
Evaluations (specify)
Developmental
Recommendations
ME 360 Mechanics of
Machinery Yes No
• Increase the number of
practical projects for the
student to benefit from the
practical side.
• Request for In-Class Internet
connectivity.
ME 363 Mechanics of
Machinery Lab Yes No
Increase the number of
experiments for the student to
benefit from the practical side.
ME 371 Thermodynamics -1 Yes No
• Replace one midterm exam
with a term project.
• Plan to visit a real power
plant.
ME 335 Manufacturing
Processes Yes No
Increasing number of Books in
the Library and Tutorial hours
ME 336 Manufacturing
Processes Lab Yes No
Increasing number of
Equipment/Machines in the
Manufacturing Processes Lab
ME 372 Thermodynamics – 2 Yes No None
ME 383 Thermo-fluid
Laboratory -1 Yes No Repair of defected setups
ME 385 Fluid Mechanics Yes No None
ME 340 Mechanical Design -1 Yes No
• Increase the number of
practical projects for the
student to benefit from the
practical side.
• Request for In-Class Internet
connectivity.
ME 344 Measurements and
Instrumentation Yes No Conduct more experiments.
ME 384 Thermo-fluid
Laboratory -2 Yes No Repair of defected setups
ME 395 Heat Transfer Yes No None
MGMT 402 Project Management Yes No None
ME 441 Mechanical Design -2 Yes No None
ME465 System Dynamics and
Automatic Control Yes No None
ME 468 System Dynamics and
Automatic Control Lab Yes No
• Increase the number of
practical projects for the
student to benefit from the
practical side.
• Request for MATLAB
software in Lab.
ME 491 Graduation Project - 1 Yes No None
ECON 401 Engineering Economy Yes No
• Increasing in class and home
assignments.
• Requesting more text books
• 4 MAT system widely used
• Fixing data show
GE 406 Summer Training Yes No None
11
Course
Code Course Title
Student
Evaluation ( Yes-No)
Other
Evaluations (specify)
Developmental
Recommendations
ME 492 Graduation Project - 2 Yes No None
ME 495 Thermal Fluid Systems Yes No None
2. Students Evaluation of Program Quality (program survey)
* Attach report on the students evaluation of program quality
3. Other Evaluations (e.g. Evaluations by independent reviewer, program advisory committee, and stakeholders (e.g., faculty members,
alumni, and employers)
* Attach independent reviewer’s report and stakeholders’ survey reports ( if any)
4. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) List the results of the program key performance indicators (including the key performance indicators required by the
National Center for Academic Accreditation and evaluation)
No KPI Target
Benchmark
Actual
Value
Internal
Benchmark Analysis
New Target
Benchmark
1 KPI-P-01
80%
69.2%
Needs
Improvement 80%
Evaluation Date : Number of Participants:
Students Feedback Program Response
Strengths:
Students are aware of the program’s mission, which is
in line with the university’s mission
Students are informed of program policies.
The program provided all students with a guide
containing all the rules of conduct that define students'
rights and obligations.
The program provides academic advising for students
when needed.
The classrooms are convenient for learning.
Satisfactory
Areas for Improvement::
Information about the program and courses was
presented to students.
The program provides for organizing
the necessary seminars
Suggestions for improvement:
The program should be presented seminars about
information about the program and information about
the courses taught in it.
The program provides for organizing
the necessary seminars
Evaluation method : Date: Number of Participants :
Summary of Evaluator Review Program Response
Strengths:
(N/A)
(N/A)
Points for Improvements::
(N/A)
(N/A)
Suggestions for improvement
(N/A)
(N/A)
12
2 KPI-P-02 80% 3.68
Needs
Improvement 4
3 KPI-P-03 80% 3.57
Needs
Improvement 4
4 KPI-P-04 80% 78.95%
Needs
Improvement 80%
5 KPI-P-05 80% 100% Strong Point 100%
6 KPI-P-06 80%
7 KPI-P-07 80%
8 KPI-P-08 25 20 Strong Point 25
9 KPI-P-09 80%
10 KPI-P-10 80% 3.52
Needs
Improvement 4
11 KPI-P-11 15:1 8:01 Strong Point 8:01
12 KPI-P-12 20% Professors/
80% Others
27%
Professors/73%
Others Strong Point
20%
Professors/80
% Others
13 KPI-P-13 10% 4.5%
Needs
Improvement 0%
14 KPI-P-14 80% 91% Strong Point 95%
15 KPI-P-15 80% 168% Strong Point 80%
16 KPI-P-16 2 8.8 Strong Point 8
17 KPI-P-17 80% 3.33
Needs
Improvement 4
Comments on the Program KPIs and Benchmarks results :
(1) It is noticed that the level of performance of the indicators KPI-P-1, KPI-P-2, KPI-P-3, KPI-P-4,
KPI-P-10, KPI-P-13, and KPI-P-17 are slightly less than the target performance level, so the target
performance level for these indicators has been fixed.
(2) It is noticed that the KPI-P-5 and KPI-P-14 performance levels exceeded the target performance
level, so the target was increased to match the current level of the index.
(3) It is noticed that the KPI-P-8, KPI-P-11, and KPI-P-15 performance levels are better than the target
performance level, so the target has been modified to match the current level of the index.
(4) It is noticed that the performance level of the KPI-P-12 indicator will always remain constant,
given that the current headquarters always have male faculty members only.
(5) It is noticed that the KPI-P-16 performance level is much higher than the target performance level,
so the target has been modified to match the current level of the index.
5. Analysis of Program Evaluation (Including strengths, Areas for Improvement: and priorities for improvement)
Strengths :
1- The KPIs prove that the program is satisfactory in progress.
2- The faculty/student ratio is acceptable.
3- The program objectives are consistence to the university mission and vision.
4- Course specification and syllabus are available for all courses of the program.
5- The ME program is accredited by another international association (ABET).
6- The faculty members have high and diverse experience related to ME program.
7- The faculty members are affiliated to several countries and schools.
8- The labs and Equipment are adequate for the program. Areas for Improvement:
1- More technician and lab operators are needed for labs.
2- Some text books are required to be updated. Priorities for Improvement:
1- Requesting the administration for hiring technicians
2- Contacting the subject committees and central library to update the text books.
13
G. Difficulties and Challenges Faced Program Management
Difficulties and Challenges Implications on the Program Actions Taken
N/A
*Internal and external difficulties and challenges
H. Program Improvement Plan
No. Priorities for
Improvement Actions
Action
Responsibility
Date Achievement
Indicators
Target
Benchmark Start End
1 Update text books
of several courses
Contacting
administration Administration 2020 2021 -- --
2 Hiring lab
technicians
Contacting
administration Administration 2020 2021
Hiring 2 persons
at least
Hiring 8
persons
3
Applying term
project on
selected courses
to enhance the
practical skills of
the students
Approval by
Subject
committees and
program
committees
PM 2020 2021 6 courses 6 courses
I. Report Approving Authority
NCAAA Coordinator Dr. Hussein Zain
Program Director Dr. Osama Mohammed Irfan
Council / Committee ME Program Committee – ME Council
Reference No. ME Council Meeting (4)
Date 18/11/2020
J. Attachments: A separate cohort analysis report for male and female sections and for each branch
A report on the program learning outcomes assessment results for male and female
sections and for each branch (if any)
A report on the students evaluation of program quality
Independent reviewer’s report and other survey reports (if any)