measuring unintended pregnancy in 2000-2001 hawai`i prams data limin song, m.p.h., c.h.e.s. cheryl...
TRANSCRIPT
Measuring Unintended Pregnancy in 2000-2001 Hawai`i PRAMS Data
Limin Song, M.P.H., C.H.E.S.Cheryl B. Prince, Ph.D., M.P.H.Nighat Quadri, M.S., M.P.H.
Traditional question
Thinking back to just before you got pregnant with your new baby, how did you feel about becoming pregnant?
• I wanted to be pregnant sooner• I wanted to be pregnant later• I wanted to be pregnant then• I didn’t want to be pregnant then or at any time in the
future
Traditional Definition
sooner + then = intended
later + never =unintended
Filter Question
When you got pregnant with your new baby, were you trying to become pregnant?
(No/Yes)
Question?
Exclude ‘TRYING’ women from unintended group?
Purpose
• To compare data on intendedness using both questions vs. only traditional question
• To determine the best measurement tool of pregnancy intendedness for the State of Hawai`i.
Hawai`i PRAMS
• Native Hawaiian/Part Hawaiian women
• Women living in rural areas outside of Honolulu
Honolulu
Methods
• Analyzed demographic characteristics of Hawai`i PRAMS mothers delivering in 2000-2001
• Compared statistics between traditional unintended pregnancy definition and definition using both questions
Results
Sample size 6,251
Respondents 5,009 (80%)
Estimated live births 33,991
(Weighted population size)
Characteristics Percent
Age <20
20-24
25-34
>34
10.3
24.9
48.0
16.8
Education <12 years
12 years
>12 years
9.5
41.4
49.0
Marital Status
Married
Not married
67.7
32.3
Results
Characteristics Percent
Race/Ethnicity Chinese & Japanese
Filipino
Hawaiian/Pt Hawaiian
Other Asian & Pac. I.
Other Nonwhite
White
16.2
20.7
27.0
9.4
4.1
22.5
Residence Urban Honolulu
Rural Oahu
Neighbor Islands
50.2
23.7
26.1
Income <$10,000
$10,000-30,000
$30,001-50,000
>$50,000
14.4
31.9
25.0
28.7
Results
Results
I wanted to be pregnant:
Trying to get pregnant
Yes No
Sooner 29.49% 6.41%
Later 4.99% 61.16%
Then 64.68% 16.83%
Didn’t want 0.84% 15.59%
Results
Unintended pregnancy
Intended pregnancy
Use one question
(traditional)44.3% 55.7%
Use both questions
41.6% 58.4%
• Unintended Pregnancy Rate Among Seventeen States:
33.7% -------------- 52.0%
(Utah) (Louisiana)
1999 PRAMS Surveillance Report
Extending the Study
Other Measurements:
• Wanted
• Mistimed
• Unwanted
• Ambivalent
Commonly Used Definition
I wanted to be pregnant:
Sooner + then = wanted
Later = mistimed
Never = unwanted
Two additional questions
When you got pregnant with your new baby, were you or your husband or partner doing anything to keep from getting pregnant? (yes/no)
What were your or your husband’s or partner’s reasons for not doing anything to keep from getting pregnant? (one option is ‘I didn’t mind if I got pregnant’)
Our Results
• Wanted – 50.29%• Mistimed – 28.53%
• Ambivalent – 12.88%• Unwanted – 8.29%
Unclassified - 0.02% (1)
How did we get these numbers?
• Use information from all four questions
• Include women with some missing values
Conclusions
• The intention to become pregnant is a difficult concept to measure precisely.
• Discussing with the family planning program staff for further decision.
Limitation
Since stillbirths are not included in the PRAMS data set, measuring the prevalence of pregnancy intendedness using PRAMS data will never be 100% accurate.
Public Health Benefits
• Development of a stable and reliable measurement tool
• Directing scarce resources to focus on populations at risk.
Acknowledgements
• Ms. Marisa Martin, Family Health Service Division, former Hawai`i PRAMS Data Manager
• George Lin and Caryn Tottori, Office of Health Status Monitoring
• Hawai`i PRAMS team
• Dr. Nedra Whitehead, Division of Reproductive Health, CDC
Keep Marching…
2004-2005
sooner + using BC = mistimed, otherwise sooner=wanted later + (trying or didn’t mind) =ambivalent, otherwise later=mistimed then + using BC = ambivalent, otherwise then=wanted never + (trying or didn’t mind) = ambivalent, otherwise never=unwanted
missing feel + trying = wanted missing feel + (not or missing try) + using BC = unwanted missing feel + (not or missing try) + (not using or missing BC) + mind =unwanted missing feel +(not or missing try) + (not using or missing BC) + didn’t mind = wanted missing feel + not trying + not using BC + missing mind = ambivalent all missing = unclassified
How did we get these numbers?