measuring outcomes: a methodological challenge m9205 october 24, 2000

33
Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Upload: sara-berry

Post on 29-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge

M9205 October 24, 2000

Page 2: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Dummy variable

variable in a regression equation with a finite number of values so that different categories of a nominal variable can be identified.

also called an indicator variable Examples

1=treatment0=no treatment

1=female2=male

1=female2=male

1=residence in West 0=residence is Central-1=residence is East

Page 3: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Identification of the time frame

Immediately following the intervention

3-6 months post intervention 5 years Lifetime

Page 4: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Selection of objective measures

Use of services Return to work Life expectancy

Page 5: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Selection of subjective measures

Provider assessment Quality of life or other patient

reports Observer reports

Page 6: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Development of data

Access to multiple sources Developing a cohort Retrospective cohort identification

Page 7: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

HEDIS as an example of the issues

A set of 75 performance measures for comparison of HMOs

Designed for purchasers of care plans

Page 8: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Measures should be

relevant scientifically sound feasible

Page 9: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Sample HEDIS Measures

Effectiveness of care• beta blocker

treatments after heart attack

• childhood immunization status

Access to care• availability of

primary care providers

• annual dental visit Cost of Care

• rate trends

Page 10: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Measures, cont.

Informed care choices• language/

translation services

Descriptive information• provider

compensation• pediatric mental

health network• family planing

Page 11: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

A nursing perspective on the challenges*

increasing nursing involvement in quality initiatives

identifying strategies that are effective

changing the clinical framework demonstrating nursing’s

contributions *Jones KR et al 1997 Policy Issues Associated with analyzing outcomes of care Image 29:3 (261-7)

Page 12: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

ANA Report Card Goals

Test relationships between nurse staffing and specific outcome indicators

Assess the feasibility of capturing information necessary to develop measures with acceptable reliability and validity

Page 13: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

ANA Methodology

quantify nurse staffing at a sample of hospitals

quantify patient incidents and length of stay at same hospitals

measure relationship between these two sets of variables

Page 14: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

ANA Data challenges

For two states, had to allocate total numbers of hours worked to cost centers

California proportion of hours per cost center used as base of NY and Mass allocations

Page 15: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

ANA Data challenges, cont.

Nursing intensity weights used as developed in NY

dimensions include • assessment, • planing, • physical needs, • medical needs, • socioemotional support, • teaching

Page 16: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

ANA Quality indicators for acute care settings

Outcomes• Patient satisfaction

with nursing care, pain management, patient education

• Patient injury rate• Nosocomial infection

rate

Process• maintenance of skin

integrity• nursing staff

satisfaction Structure

• mix of RN, LPN, unlicensed staff

• total care hours per patient

Page 17: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Blegan, Goode, Reed Nurse Staffing

Objective: describe at the level of the nursing care unit the relationships among total hours of care, RN skill mix and adverse outcomes

Methods: corellational and multivariate analyses controlling for patient acuity

Page 18: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Measures selected included rates of

medication errors (from incident reports)

patient falls (from incident reports) skin breakdown patient and family complaints infections deaths

Page 19: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Nurse staffing variables

hours of care per patient day from all nursing personnel

hours of care provided by RNs

Page 20: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Key analysis

“total hours of patient care. . .was associated with higher rates of decubiti, complaints and death. . . .Given the high correlation between acuity and total nursing care hours, the interpretation of these coefficients must be done with care” (p. 49)

Page 21: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Key analysis

“Most of the previous research in this area was multiinstitutional and generalizeable but suffered from an accompanying lack of detail. The results of this project are more detailed and specific but less generalizable.” (p. 49)

Page 22: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Chen Top 100 Hospitals

Issue: do Medicare patients with acute MI admitted to a “top 100” hospital receive better care or have better outcomes than patients treated in other hospitals?

Page 23: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Quality of care measures

use of aspirin during hospitalization

reperfusion therapy in-hospital use of beta blockers

Page 24: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Findings

top 100 hospitals more likely to have higher AMI volume, be private for-profit, have on-site facilities for procedures

major differences were in length of stay and cost per AMI admission ($1,014 to $1,855 lower per admission; highly correlated with LOS)

Page 25: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Comment

goal of ‘top 100’ was to identify superior financial management, operations and clinical practices.

it may, instead, identify lower LOS and cost for same outcomes

Page 26: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Frank et al, Treating Depression

Why care? 1/2 of private insurance for MH is on depression

Defining value and benefits Critical of either traditional cost

effectiveness analysis or supply-demand analysis

Page 27: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Frank: Definitions

system effectiveness: sum of all effects produced by health care in a system, including those persons treated by various methods and those not treated at all

system cost: sum of all direct treatment costs

Systems cost effectiveness is the ration of system effects to system costs

Page 28: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Data identification

identifying persons and episodes: claims data

treatment effects: clinical research on efficacy and effectiveness

Page 29: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Findings

cost for highest expected outcomes was $1,059/case

20% of all spending was in the range expected to equal no treatment.

Page 30: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Kelleher

Concurrent, prospective study Consecutive admissions Resident assessment of variables Outcome of interest: length of stay Scales created for the study

Page 31: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Kelleher

Regression analysis to identify explanatory power

Severity has been common indicator and does help

adding difficulty increases explanatory power

peak values and fluctuation strongly predictive

Page 32: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Borzekowski

Outcome of interest: response to anti-violence PSA’s

Interest, understanding, credibility, effect

Sample size? location? Low but suggestive significance

Page 33: Measuring Outcomes: a methodological challenge M9205 October 24, 2000

Columbia University School of Nursing M6920, Fall, 2000

Sochalski et al

Research review Proposal of an agenda Focus on nursing staff patterns