measures of nitrogen use efficiency and environmental

27
J. Mark Powell US Dairy Forage Research Center Madison, Wisconsin Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 14, 2015 Measures of nitrogen use efficiency and environmental impacts of dairy production systems

Upload: others

Post on 28-Dec-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

J. Mark Powell US Dairy Forage Research Center

Madison, Wisconsin

Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 14, 2015

Measures of nitrogen use efficiency and environmental impacts of dairy production systems

Outline 1.  Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in dairy production

a.  Whole-farm NUE

b.  Feed NUE

c.  Manure NUE

2.  Trade-offs in N use, N conservation and N loss

3.  Summary points

Nitrogen Input

Nitrogen Product

1. Nitrogen use in dairy production

Geographic (county, state, region, country) Watershed Whole-farm Farm components

NU

E s

cale

s

1. NUE (P ÷ I) 2. N balance (I - P) {

What realistic improvements in NUE can be expected from dairy producers?

{

1.  Biological limits to incorporate N into products

2.  Fixed physical and operational farm features

3.  N applications to avoid risk

4.  Excessive N use (wastage)

Fact of life (not very manageable)

Somewhat manageable

Manageable

Important components of NUE

Somewhat manageable

Complexities of N use

•  Biological systems are limited in N use

•  Major portions of agricultural N inputs are lost to the environment

•  Nitrogen loss pathways are diverse and interact

•  There are tradeoffs in N use, N conservation and N loss

NUE Dairy Production Systems

Whole-farm NUE Land carrying capacity

Whole-farm NUE When carrying capacity is exceeded

• More feed imported

• NUE declines (too much manure)

• Environmental N losses increase

Too many cows ….too much manure

66% of Wisconsin dairy farms ≥1.6 acres/cow These farms are self sufficient in forage & grain

56 44

35 36

4.9 3.3 2.5 1.2

Whole - farm NUE (%)

. Acres/cow

14 18 26 43 Denitrified N (lb/a/y)

15 20 29 53 Leached N (lb/a/y)

23 30 42

75 Volatilized N (lb/a/y)

Ration N transformed into milk or manure

Forage 45 - 65%

Grain 20-30%

Protein Suppl.

20-30%

Minerals & Vitamins

1-2%

Manure 65-80%

Milk 20-35%

Typical lactating cow ration (dry matter basis)

Carry capacity, feed production, N use and N loss

Nitrogen Use and Loss

35% 41%

Forage  plus  grain  farm  1.8  acres/cow  

Forage  only  farm  1.1  acres/cow  

Ammonia  

Nitrous  oxide  

Nitrate  

Runoff  77%

12% 11%

71%

N  losses  77  lb  N/a   110  lb  N/a  

Forage  plus  grain  farm   Forage  only  farm  1.8  acres/cow   1.1  acres/cow  

N  sources  

Fer3lizer  

Biol.  Fixed-­‐N  

Nex  (non-­‐UUN)  

Nex  (UUN)  

Atmos.  

240  lb  N/a   320  lb  N/a  

25% 30%

35% 41%

51 112

169 266

344 Nitrogen balance (lb/a)

Acres/cow

0.53

0.36 0.32 0.24 0.20

2.0 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1

Whole-farm NUE (%)

Staines et al., 2008

Pasture stocking rate impacts NUE and N balance

Permissible in Europe

Feed N transformed into milk or manure

Forage 45 - 65%

Grain 20-30%

Protein Suppl.

20-30%

Minerals & Vitamins

1-2%

Manure 65-80%

Milk 20-35%

Typical lactating cow ration (Wisconsin confinement farm)

Management impacts ration NUE and N loss

Management impacts ration NUE

Manure 65-80%

Milk 20-35%

NUE of the ration

Milk 3x/d

Use Posilac

Feed TMR

Balance rations

No Yes Practice (54 Wisconsin dairy farms) increase due

to practice

28%

25%

22%

33%

17 23 29 35 I I I I

11 I

•  Lost as ammonia (20-40%)

•  Taken up by plants (20-40%)

•  Lost via nitrate leaching (10-20%)

•  Lost via denitrification (3-5%)

•  Immobilized in soil (not much)

What happens to N excreted in manure?

? Manure

?

Milk

Excreted N Crops/Pasture N

Manure collection Storage method

Application method Other N applied

Manure NUE

Manure NUE 20-40% (of excreted N)

Collected

Manure collection (n=54 Wisconsin dairy farms)

66%

Tie-stall barns Free-stall barns

89% Not Collected

•  Manure N deposition 305 to 4885 lb/a/y

•  Some farmers rotate outside areas with pasture and/or crops

Uncollected manure on Wisconsin dairy farms

Dairy system type impacts N loss pathways

0102030405060708090

Free-­‐stall Tie-­‐stall Grazing

N loss (% of urinary N excretion) Pool 1 Excreted in non- productive areas

Pool 2 During collection and storage

Pool 3 During land application

Pool 4 After land application

A

NU

E (%

ExN

in c

rops

)

0-

10-

20-

30-

40-

50-

2 d- 4 d- 2 d- 4 d-

Barn manure Outside manure

Effects of urinary N 13%

7%

4-year study in WI

B B C BC

NUE of excreted manure N

2. Tradeoffs in N use and loss

Crop production N outputs: milk meat

Groundwater & surface waters

N inputs: N manure, N fertilizer BNF, N deposition

Dairy production

N outputs: harvested crop

NH4+ NO3

- DON Npart

NH3 N2O NOX N2

NH4+ NO3

- DON Npart

manure

NH3 N2O NOX N2

feed

Atmosphere

Adapted from Oenema et al., 2009

Atmosphere

Tradeoff (NH3 vs NO3)

% loss of total manure N applied

26.8 22.2 9.6

% as ammonia 20.0 10.9 4.9

% as nitrate 6.8 11.3 4.7

Tillage may reduce NH3 emission …..but may increase NO3 leaching

020406080

100120140160180

Ammoniaemission

Nitrateleaching

a

c

b

a

b

a

SurfaceApplic.

PartialIncorp.

Injection

b

a

bCum

ulat

ive

NH

3-N

, NO

3-N

an

d to

tal N

loss

(kg

ha-1

)

A

A

B

TRADEOFF

4-y field trial with corn Wisconsin

Improvements in NUE on dairy farms through management of livestock and their excreta •  Maintain good stocking rates

•  Feed most balanced rations possible

•  Collect manure and conserve urine

•  Recognize and incorporate N use and N loss tradeoffs into N management planning

Summary

Recognize factors that impact NUE •  Biological (N incorporation into products)

•  Physical (climate, soils)

•  Farm ‘fixed’ operational features (e.g., barns, manure storage)

•  Excessive use (risk avoidance, wastage)

Impediments to enhanced NUE on dairy farms

•  Establish N use baselines (using NUE, N balance) to monitor progress towards desired change.

•  What NUE targets are actually achievable?

•  Manage N losses?

What realistic improvements in NUE can be expected from producers?