measurements and characterization of gasoline hcci combustion

1
University of Wisconsin Engine Research Center Future Work Approach to Unmixedness Experiments Measurements and Characterization of Gasoline HCCI Measurements and Characterization of Gasoline HCCI Combustion Combustion Angelo P. Chialva, Randy E. Herold, David E. Foster, Jaal B. Ghandhi To quantify the effects fuel/air, thermal, and residual gas unmixedness have on gasoline HCCI combustion Lab Objective Engine Intake Charge: Imposed Unmixedness Combustion and Emissions Results GM HCCI Lab Experiments Chart Engine intake port / intake manifold design: - Dual and independent intake charge runners. - Extended intake port septum. - Two independently heat controlled dual intake charge mixtures (air, fuel and external EGR) • Conduct experiments in optical engine to test different intake port/ intake manifold setups for the purpose of maintaining charge bulk unmixedness. • Run HCCI combustion tests in metal engine to characterize the effects of thermal and EGR unmixedness as different levels of uniform unmixedness are obtained in the mixture charge. • Analyze combustion and emissions performance in HCCI engine tests while introducing thermal and EGR unmixedness at lighter engine loads and leaner air-fuel mixture conditions. • Study the combined effects of thermal and EGR unmixedness in engine combustion and emissions while implementing rebreathing cams and varying effective CRs. Unmixedness Experiments: Lab setup Intake valves lift profile target: “minimization of charge mixing in intake port due to back-flow.” Investigating in-cylinder mixture charge bulk unmixedness: -Using dual intake surge tank, split runner setup, investigate the in-cylinder flow field evolution from 330 °bTDC (intake) through 30 °bTDC (compression) using PLIF. - Bulk stratification is created by feeding each port independently. However, that initially stratified charge is mixed throughout the induction and compression processes, resulting in a uniform unmixedness at 30 °bTDC. Split runner / split port setup HCCI Combustion Performance Baseline -Definition of HCCI combustion temperature window: - Low Temperature End: COV of IMEP (1). - High Temperature End: Knock index (2). - Engine IMEP through out temperature window (3). - Homogeneous EGR and intake charge temperature. Temperature Stratification EGR Stratification Intake Charge Temperature Sweeps -Imposed intake charge thermal unmixedness by: - Varying intake charge temperature at each runner. - Targeting in- cylinder mass averaged temperatures within HCCI window. - Maximum temperature delta up 80 degrees Celsius. Pressure Balanced Intake System: EGR + Air + Fuel -Imposed intake charge EGR unmixedness by: - Varying EGR distribution between split intake charges. Case#1 Case#2 Case#1 – T_strat_d Case#2 – T_strat_e Engine Load IMEP An increase in engine IMEP is observed as delta temperature between runners mixture increases. Temperature Stratification : Baseline cases vs. Temperature Stratification (T_strat_e1) cases. COV of IMEP Improvement of COV of IMEP is found at stages with high cycle to cycle variations. Emissions Index CO Effects of intake charge temperature stratification provide trends with higher combustion burning efficiencies. Increasing delta temperature at a fixed “mass averaged temperature.” Maximum temperature delta ~ 80 Emissions Index HC Effects of intake charge temperature stratific provide trends with higher combustion burning efficiencies. EGR Stratification : Baseline cases vs. EGR Stratification (EGR_unmixedness) cases. 99.0 98.5 98.0 97.5 97.0 96.5 96.0 C om bustion Efficiency 350 345 340 335 330 325 320 315 AirIntake Tem perature (C ) Baseline_1 Baseline_2 Baseline_3 EG R _unm ixedness_1 EG R _unm ixedness_2 35 30 25 20 15 10 EIH C (g/kg) 350 345 340 335 330 325 320 315 AirIntake Tem perature (C ) Baseline_1 Baseline_2 Baseline_3 E G R _unm ixedness_1 E G R _unm ixedness_2 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 C A 50 (deg aTD C ) 350 345 340 335 330 325 320 315 AirIntake Tem perature (C ) Baseline_1 Baseline_2 Baseline_3 EG R _unm ixedness_1 EG R _unm ixedness_2 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 EIN O (g/kg) 350 345 340 335 330 325 320 315 AirIntake Tem perature (C ) Baseline_1 Baseline_2 Baseline_3 E G R _unm ixedness_1 E G R _unm ixedness_2 Combustion Efficiency Similar burning efficiencies are achieved at lower intake charge temperatures. Emissions Index HC High combustion efficiency at lower intake temperatures results in lower HC emissions. Combustion Phasing CA50 Combustion phasing approaching TDC occurs at lower intake charge temperatures. Emissions Index NO Levels of NO emissions increases as intake ch temperature increases with an offset of 20 de respect to baseline data points. Temperature offset on engine data between cases with homogeneous and unmixed EGR ~ 20 degrees Ce stock profile current profile window shift window shift

Upload: nellis

Post on 08-Jan-2016

53 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

DESCRIPTION

Measurements and Characterization of Gasoline HCCI Combustion. Angelo P. Chialva, Randy E. Herold, David E. Foster, Jaal B. Ghandhi. Lab Objective. Engine Intake Charge: Imposed Unmixedness. Combustion and Emissions Results. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Measurements and Characterization of Gasoline HCCI Combustion

University of Wisconsin Engine Research Center

Future Work

Approach to Unmixedness Experiments

Measurements and Characterization of Gasoline HCCI CombustionMeasurements and Characterization of Gasoline HCCI CombustionAngelo P. Chialva, Randy E. Herold, David E. Foster, Jaal B. Ghandhi

• To quantify the effects fuel/air, thermal, and residual gas unmixedness have on gasoline HCCI combustion

Lab Objective Engine Intake Charge: Imposed Unmixedness Combustion and Emissions Results

GM HCCI Lab Experiments Chart

Engine intake port / intake manifold design:- Dual and independent intake charge runners.- Extended intake port septum.- Two independently heat controlled dual intake charge mixtures (air, fuel and external EGR)

• Conduct experiments in optical engine to test different intake port/ intake manifold setups for the purpose of maintaining charge bulk unmixedness.

• Run HCCI combustion tests in metal engine to characterize the effects of thermal and EGR unmixedness as different levels of uniform unmixedness are obtained in the mixture charge.

• Analyze combustion and emissions performance in HCCI engine tests while introducing thermal and EGR unmixedness at lighter engine loads and leaner air-fuel mixture conditions.

• Study the combined effects of thermal and EGR unmixedness in engine combustion and emissions while implementing rebreathing cams and varying effective CRs.

Unmixedness Experiments: Lab setup

Intake valves lift profile target:“minimization of charge mixing inintake port due to back-flow.”

Investigating in-cylinder mixture charge bulk unmixedness:

-Using dual intake surge tank, split runner setup, investigate the in-cylinder flow field evolution from 330 °bTDC (intake) through 30 °bTDC (compression) using PLIF.

- Bulk stratification is created by feeding each port independently.

However, that initially stratified charge is mixed throughout the induction and compression processes, resulting in a uniform unmixedness at 30 °bTDC.

Split runner / splitport setup

HCCI Combustion Performance Baseline

-Definition of HCCI combustion temperature window:

- Low Temperature End: COV of IMEP (1). - High Temperature End: Knock index (2). - Engine IMEP through out temperature window (3). - Homogeneous EGR andintake charge temperature.

Temperature Stratification

EGR Stratification

Intake Charge Temperature Sweeps

-Imposed intake charge thermal unmixedness by:

- Varying intake charge temperature at each runner. - Targeting in-cylinder mass averaged temperatures within HCCI window. - Maximum temperature delta up 80 degrees Celsius.

Pressure Balanced Intake System: EGR + Air + Fuel

-Imposed intake charge EGR unmixedness by:

- Varying EGR distribution between split intake charges.

Case#1 Case#2

Case#1 – T_strat_d

Case#2 – T_strat_e

Engine Load IMEPAn increase in engine IMEP is observed as deltatemperature between runners mixture increases.

Temperature Stratification: Baseline cases vs. Temperature Stratification (T_strat_e1) cases.

COV of IMEPImprovement of COV of IMEP is found at stages with high cycle to cycle variations.

Emissions Index COEffects of intake charge temperature stratificationprovide trends with higher combustion burning efficiencies.

Increasing delta temperature at a fixed “mass averaged temperature.” Maximum temperature delta ~ 80 degrees Celsius.

Emissions Index HCEffects of intake charge temperature stratificationprovide trends with higher combustion burning efficiencies.

EGR Stratification: Baseline cases vs. EGR Stratification (EGR_unmixedness) cases.

99.0

98.5

98.0

97.5

97.0

96.5

96.0

Com

bust

ion

Effi

cien

cy

350345340335330325320315Air Intake Temperature (C)

Baseline_1Baseline_2Baseline_3EGR_unmixedness_1EGR_unmixedness_2

35

30

25

20

15

10

EIH

C (

g/kg

)

350345340335330325320315Air Intake Temperature (C)

Baseline_1Baseline_2Baseline_3EGR_unmixedness_1EGR_unmixedness_2

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

CA

50

(deg

aT

DC

)

350345340335330325320315Air Intake Temperature (C)

Baseline_1Baseline_2Baseline_3EGR_unmixedness_1EGR_unmixedness_2

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

EIN

O (

g/kg

)

350345340335330325320315Air Intake Temperature (C)

Baseline_1Baseline_2Baseline_3EGR_unmixedness_1EGR_unmixedness_2

Combustion Efficiency Similar burning efficiencies are achieved atlower intake charge temperatures.

Emissions Index HC High combustion efficiency at lower intake chargetemperatures results in lower HC emissions.

Combustion Phasing CA50 Combustion phasing approaching TDC occursat lower intake charge temperatures.

Emissions Index NO Levels of NO emissions increases as intake chargetemperature increases with an offset of 20 degrees respect to baseline data points.

Temperature offset on engine data between cases with homogeneous and unmixed EGR ~ 20 degrees Celsius.

stock profile

current profile

window shift

window shift