measurement of thermal neutron and ar at kek...

16
Measurement of thermal neutron and 41 Ar at KEK Linac KEK T. Oyama, H. Iwase , A. Toyoda, T. Sanami, and Y. Namito Radiation science center, KEK, Japan

Upload: others

Post on 12-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Measurement of thermal neutron and 41Ar at KEK Linac

    KEK

    T. Oyama, H. Iwase, A. Toyoda, T. Sanami, and Y. NamitoRadiation science center, KEK, Japan

  • 1. Purpose - Air activation by electron accelerator

    2

    - e- facilities have less air activation than hadron facilities- However modern e- accelerators will have higher power- More accurate evaluation of air activation is required

    - Experimental study on 41Ar production

    Nuclide Halflife Reaction Threshold (MeV). 12.3y

    53.3d

    20.4m

    9.96m2.04m37.2m55.5m1.82h thermal neutron

    a pair of pump and stack

    ratio of evaluated air activation productionin whole linac tunnel

  • 1.2 KEK Linac

    3

    e+ DumpingRing

    Linace-

    e-e+

    e+ productiontarget

    e-

    e-

    maximum beam powere- 10 GeV 625nA ~ 6.3kW

    on target (future x1.5)e- 3.3 GeV 800nA ~ 2.6kW

    SUPER

    KEKB

    PFAR6.5GeV

    PF2.5Ge

    V

  • 1.3 KEK-Linac positron production target

    4

    Beam e- 3.3 GeV, 100 nATarget W 1cm and other components

    (thick target)

    targetyork

    cabitye- by RF gun

    T. Kamitani (KEK)

    ~15cm

  • lystron roomklystron room

    concrete concrete

    controlled(max 20 uSv/h)controlled

    keep out

    keep out

    public(max

    0.2 uSv/h)

    KEK controlled (max 1.5 uSv/h)

    Target shield 2015 (Radsynch15)Target shield final ver. (3.3 GeV 1250nA e-)

    Distance 555cmConcrete 320cmIron 70cm

    Distance 430cmConcrete 250cmIron 59cm

    Distance 700cmConcrete 400cmIron 72cmground level

    controlledcontrolled

    KEKcontrolled

  • 2. Methods

    6

  • 2.1 Experiment-A - 40Ar gas direct irradiation

    7

    40Ar gas packages were set in tunnel at positions of X, Y, and Z

    3.3GeV e-X

    (0m)

    Target

    Y(15m)

    Z(35m)

  • 2.2 Experiment-B - Thermal neutron fluence Φ

    8

    Thermal neutron fluence Φ in tunnel was measured by the Gold foil activation with/without Cadmium cover

    JENDL-4.0JENDL-4.0

    3.3GeV e- X(0m)

    Target

    Y(15m)

    Z(35m

    )

  • 2.3 Experiment-C - Thermal neutron spatial distribution

    9

    targete-

    30m

    Thermal neutron fluence Φ in tunnel was measured by the Gold methodat different positions of upstream and downstream from the target

  • 3 Result1 - Experiments A and B

    10

    A: Ar gas(Bq/cm3/kW)

    B: Gold foil(Bq/cm3/kW)

    X(0m) 9.2±1.4 9.2±0.7

    Y(15m) 0.73±0.14 0.56±0.034

    Z(35m) 0.077±0.016 0.038±0.0015

    3.3GeV e- X(0m)

    Target

    Y(15m)

    Z(35m

    )

    kW)

  • 3.2 Result2 - Thermal neutron spatial distribution

    11

    targete-

    30m

    ±30m from target covers 99% of total

    integrationrange

    ratio to totalamount

    ±15m 91%

    ±20m 96%

    ±30m 99%

    PHITS 3D Monte Carlo simulation

    measurements

  • 40Ar (n, γ) 41Ar reaction

    12

    capture

    Neutron energy spectrum in tunnel around target

    PHITSMonte Carlosimulation

    41Ar productionsinduced below 1 eV neutron (10-6 MeV)account for 98.7% of total

  • Gold foil can be used instead of Gas?

    • Experiment-C indicates that thermal neutrons distribute in certain range of ±20m (or ±30m)

    • The discrepancy of the Experiment-A(Gas) and B (Gold foil) can negligible in case to obtain integral number of 41Ar production

    • the answer is yes

  • Thermal neutron source around KEK Linac target

    14

    thermal neutron (

  • Comparison to theoretical evaluation

    15

    (1) GDR neutron production Yn by Mao’s formula

    Yn = 8 × 10−6 E0 (Z0.5 + 0.12Z1.5 − 0.001Z2.5 )

    where Yn GDR neutron production per e-, E0 e- energy (MeV),

    and Z atomic number of thick target.

    If Z=74(W) Yn=1.0, and Z=29(Cu) Yn=0.52. => 0.76 (n/e-) in average

    (2) GDR neutron reduction R by components (shielding effect)

    It is difficult to predict by hand-calculation. For example

    set R to 1/2. => R Yn = 0.76/2 = 0.38 (n/e-)

    (3) Neutron thermalization formula by Patterson

    Φ = C R Yn / S

    where C is a constant of 1.25, and S is total area of the tunnel (cm2)

    Φ = 2.1e4 (1/cm2/nA/sec)

    => 41Ar = 4.95e-3 (Bq/cm3/nA)

    Standard method to estimate thermal neutron fluence for electron accelerator

    compared to experiment (4.42e-3) calculation agrees well (due to (2) is estimated by experience)

  • 5. Conclusion

    16

    投影片編號 11. Purpose - Air activation by electron accelerator1.2 KEK Linac1.3 KEK-Linac positron production target投影片編號 52. Methods2.1 Experiment-A - 40Ar gas direct irradiation2.2 Experiment-B - Thermal neutron fluence Φ2.3 Experiment-C - Thermal neutron spatial distribution3 Result1 - Experiments A and B3.2 Result2 - Thermal neutron spatial distribution40Ar (n, γ) 41Ar reactionGold foil can be used instead of Gas?Thermal neutron source �around KEK Linac targetComparison to theoretical evaluation5. Conclusion