measurement of the proton elastic form factor ratio at low q 2

13
Measurement of the Proton Elastic Form Factor Ratio at Low Q 2 Xiaohui Zhan (MIT) On Behalf of E08-007 Collaboration June 14th 2008 Hall A Collaboration Meeting

Upload: zagiri

Post on 11-Jan-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Measurement of the Proton Elastic Form Factor Ratio at Low Q 2. Xiaohui Zhan (MIT) On Behalf of E08-007 Collaboration June 14th 2008 Hall A Collaboration Meeting. Outline. Background Experiment Preliminary Analysis. Proton Form Factors. Electron elastic scattering from proton:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Measurement of the Proton Elastic Form Factor Ratio at

Low Q2

Xiaohui Zhan (MIT)On Behalf of E08-007 Collaboration

June 14th 2008Hall A Collaboration Meeting

Background

Experiment

Preliminary Analysis

Outline

Proton Form Factors

Electron elastic scattering from proton:

][1

1 22ME

Mott GGd

d

d

d

22 1

2( , [1 2(1 ) tan ] )

4 2eQ

M

Sachs Form Factors:

Electric: GE(Q2)

Magnetic: GM(Q2)

Q2=0

(0) 1, (0)

(0) 0, (0)

Ep Mp p

En Mn n

G G

G G

Dipole

22

22 )

71.01()(

GeV

QQGD

1M

EP G

G

Leading order pQED(single photon exchange)

Rosenbluth Separation (Unpolarized)

)()()1( 2222 QGQG

d

dEM

MottR

Method: Vary at fixed Q2, fit linearlySlope G2

E

Intercept G2M

Difficulties:Difficulties:

• not sensitive to GE at large Q2 and to GM at small Q2

• Limited by accruaby of cross section measurement at different settings.

Recoil Polarization

2tan

2

)(2

tan)1(

2tan)1(2

'

2'0

0

eee

l

t

M

E

eM

eel

eMEt

M

EE

P

P

G

G

GM

EEPl

GGPl

Direct measurement of form factor ratiosby measuring the ratio of the transferred polarization Pt and Pl .Advantages:

• only one measurement is needed for each Q2.• much better precision than a cross section measurement.

2

World Data

At high Q2, Rosenbluth and Polarization methods do NOT agree.

2γ exchange?We focus on low Q2

E08-007

• Approved by PAC33

• Part I: a high precision survay of Proton FF ratio by recoil polarization method

• Scheduled from May 15th ~ June 9th 2008

• Succesfully completed!

Experiment Setup

e’

Ee: 1.192GeV Polarization: ~ 80%

LHRS

BigBite

VDC + FPPS1 + S2Pion rejector 1Pion rejector 2

Pp : 0.5 ~ 0.9 GeV/c

E’e: ~ 1 GeV

e’Scintillator: 13Preshower: 27x2Shower: 27x7LH2 target (6cm, 15cm)

BigBite

• Used for electron tagging (coincidence trigger).• Turned on preshower and shower every time we changed kinematics.• Selected shower blocks were on for production to reduce background

Focal Plane Polarimeter)sincos(),(),(),( fpp

yfppx

diff PPfff

Preliminary Analysis

Q2[GeV2] 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.70

( .)[%]R stat 0.95 0.70 0.55 0.70 0.46 0.52 0.53 0.44

E08-007 statistical error and world data & fits

• Statistical error can be smaller after adding the weight of different analyzing power for different

• Systematic analysis : 3 different delta settings for every Kine. Different spin precession method: COSY, Pentchev, Dipole

• Background substraction: Aluminum end-cap accidental

scatter

Impact

• Many competing effective field theories:

VMD, Lattice, RCQM, Di-Quark, CBM/LFCBM, pQCD … • Combine ratio and cross section data (Mainz).

• Proton charge density

• Zemach radius/hyperfine splitting

• Improved isovector/isoscalar form factors

• Possible impacts on other experiments: DVCS, HAPPEX & G0, …

Thank you!